UVZ presented an engineering machine based on T-90A

At the Army-2017 International Military Technical Forum held near Moscow, the model of the promising universal armored engineering vehicle (UBIM), created on the basis of tank T-90A, reports bmpd with reference to military expert Alexei Khlopotov.


UVZ presented an engineering machine based on T-90A
Model of a developed universal armored engineering vehicle (UBIM, "Object 153") based on the T-90A tank.

The machine is created by order of the Engineering Forces "Ural Design Bureau of Transport Engineering" (UKBTM, is part of JSC "NPK" Uralvagonzavod ") in the framework of the ROC" Robot-3 ".

“The name“ Robot-3 ”is the same as the work of Omsk KBTM on the development of the“ Engineering road vehicle ”based on T-80U. Actually, this is the same work. Only in this case, the machine is created on the platform of the T-90A tank, ”the expert writes.



According to the information, "Robot-3" is intended to "prepare the paths of movement and maneuver of troops, including in areas subjected to nuclear strikes. "

The car is planned to be used in divisional and army units. The work equipment is “a universal bulldozer, a telescopic boom with a manipulator and an excavator bucket, a hydraulic hammer, a traction winch, and trawling equipment,” the material says.

Photos used:
Vitaly Kuzmin, gurkhan.blogspot.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. vkl.47 4 September 2017 12: 02 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    That on armature is now on t-90. Your wonderful deeds, Lord ...
    1. cariperpaint 4 September 2017 12: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      it makes no sense to arm it now. in 20 years is possible.
      1. Voyager 4 September 2017 12: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        it makes sense to do it on the armature, so that soon the components become cheaper
        1. cariperpaint 4 September 2017 12: 37 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          the saturation of this platform of troops is not a matter of months, or even years, but decades. in order for something to become cheaper, complete unification is needed. Of course it needs to be developed but with a distant future.
          1. Shurik70 4 September 2017 13: 24 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Foreigners will see this, and they will say that these Russians even have an excavator with a bulldozer, and they do so that they can be attacked ...
            soldier
            1. Ivanych 16 May 2020 13: 26 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              That's for sure. They are.
    2. Mik13 4 September 2017 12: 52 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: vkl.47
      That on armature is now on t-90. Your wonderful deeds, Lord ...

      From the point of view of unification, it is highly desirable to have auxiliary equipment on the same base as the rest of the connection technique.
      That is, if we have a tank division on the T-72, then engineering equipment should be on the T-72. Accordingly, if in the T-90 division, then it is optimal to have the equipment on the same base.

      There will be divisions on the T-14 - there will be engineering equipment on this platform.
    3. svp67 4 September 2017 15: 17 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: vkl.47
      That on armature is now on t-90. Your wonderful deeds, Lord ...

      Yes NORMALLY everything. And what do you order NOW to offer for export? After the success of the T-90 in Syria, then that.
  2. Aaron Zawi 4 September 2017 12: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It looks very decent.
  3. Vadmir 4 September 2017 12: 15 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    How much you can spend resources time and money on the development of technology yesterday, if the course is taken to Armata. then you need to throw all your strength into fine-tuning of Almaty and make engineering machines already on the chassis of Almaty.
    And for the conversion of old T-90 tanks, they are not suitable for too few, unlike the T-72.
    1. cariperpaint 4 September 2017 12: 38 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      why is she yesterday?
      1. Vadmir 4 September 2017 13: 12 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Recall in which year the T-90 was created?
        1. cariperpaint 4 September 2017 13: 23 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          tree sticks. Well, as children, by golly. The new equipment in the armies of the type of Almaty is a prospect. decades will pass before they fill the army. the whole point of unification is that all the equipment is on one platform. even if they are 100 pieces per year, making the declared 2300 pieces is 23 years of production. and these are only tanks. all these years you propose not to build anything else?
    2. shellhound 4 September 2017 12: 39 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      1 machine based on Almaty or 10-15 cars based on T90 or 30-40 cars based on T72, I think you understand what is more relevant for our army now, given the current financial situation and the stage at which the armata is located. Moreover, Armata is a promising development that will be brought to its performance characteristics for more than a year.
      1. Vadmir 4 September 2017 13: 11 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        1 machine based on Almaty or 10-15 cars based on T90 or 30-40 cars based on T72

        On the basis of the T-72 I agree, but the T-90 is small, and releasing new ones is a criminal waste of resources and money.
        given the current financial situation and the stage at which the armata is
        So you don’t need to spray finances on a bunch of floodlights, but bring to mind the most advanced.
        1. cariperpaint 4 September 2017 13: 17 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          in general 90 both released and released. they just don’t buy them from us ..
  4. Igor V 4 September 2017 12: 40 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Why a bucket? For such machines, the rotor is more suitable.
    The connection of BAT and IMR, probably.
    1. shellhound 4 September 2017 12: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Three words - simpler, cheaper, more reliable than a rotor. For such machines - this is the main thing.
      1. 113262a 5 September 2017 00: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Even here, where clay and marl, rotary machines went to warehouses — one large boulder — and there is no bucket on the rotor! And even two or three! So they dig trenches with excavators and swords! They definitely lack armor!
  5. Engineer 4 September 2017 12: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But what about the super universal Armata platform? I am tormented by vague doubts: first the magniphone ... first the self-propelled guns are new, now we will KILL this ... the T-90 platform can be seen much more universal and cheaper.
  6. san4es 4 September 2017 13: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "Robot-3" is designed to "prepare the paths of movement and maneuver of troops, incl. in areas affected by nuclear strikes. "

    ... "Robot" - in the sense of a no-crew on the remote control?
  7. Bronevick 4 September 2017 13: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Artmatka expensive, even better so.
  8. Altona 4 September 2017 16: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    People, now I’ll come home from work, I will post a photo of the car based on the tank. Tell me what it is. On our highway passed, I took a picture on a smartphone. It looks like a pavement something.
    1. Altona 4 September 2017 17: 57 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1


      Who can tell what kind of technique this is? Photographed near the house.
      1. Michael_59 4 September 2017 21: 15 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Perhaps the new product of Motovilikhinsky Plants JSC went to the testing ground.
      2. Igor V 4 September 2017 21: 48 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Maybe it's something like TMM? Dimensions and powerful hydraulic cylinders are suitable. Sand coloring suggests that wheeled vehicles may not be able to cope there, and the plant where TMM-3M was made has long been gone. And they did it on the basis of KrAZ -260, which we also no longer have.
  9. Altona 4 September 2017 22: 43 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Michael_59
    Perhaps the new product of Motovilikhinsky Plants JSC went to the testing ground.

    --------------------------------------
    Well, geographically, this is moving towards Ulyanovsk, the Cheboksary-Ulyanovsk highway. In general, where is Perm and where is Cheboksary, what is called. Naturally, the cargo is oversized (hello reproaching me for "wagons", I have been special vehicles for 20 years), it goes on the trawl (when I designed these too), so it all interested me. banner with the inscription "large width". There were two such gizmos, another trawl did not take a picture.
    1. Michael_59 5 September 2017 08: 41 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Motovilikha took away samples of “Products” to the training ground “3 Central Research Institute” of the RF Ministry of Defense in the Nizhny Novgorod Region. I thought maybe they.