Head of RTI: Russia should not be afraid of North Korean missiles

47
The Russian missile attack warning system provides protection against North Korean ballistic missiles, reports RIA News Statement by Sergey Boyev, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Radio Engineering and Information Systems Concern (RTI).

Head of RTI: Russia should not be afraid of North Korean missiles


We do not need to be afraid of anyone. We need to seriously work to continually improve our early warning system (missile attack warning system), including in this area,
said Boev in an interview with the newspaper "Kommersant", answering the relevant question.

He noted that today there are more and more risks from the so-called “non-systemic aerospace attack”, when new means of attack may appear.

They manifest themselves in unexpected places, from unexpected groupings. We have to work on this. And do not need to be afraid.
No one, concluded the head of the concern.

The RTI group of companies is engaged in the development of radio and space technologies, security systems, microelectronics, system integration, and defense state projects. The concern includes the 21 enterprise. Over the past 6-years, RTI has been in the top 100 of global defense enterprises according to The Defense News. This year, revenues from arms sales amounted to $ 565,9 million (86-i line in the ranking).
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    1 September 2017 16: 07
    Russia does not need to be afraid of North Korean missiles. Are we afraid? We don’t have to laugh. It strains it.
    1. +9
      1 September 2017 17: 05
      That dude (I’m drunk?) Just forgot what he was saying on behalf of Russia, and not from the USA (where he has a villa, money, children and everything else).
      1. +1
        2 September 2017 06: 33
        Of course you are afraid. Look at the forum threads devoted to the "Korean topic", the "patriots" are very worried that either the Korean missile will fly in the wrong direction and fly to Russia, or the American interceptors will fly by mistake and then only the "third world war" and nothing more yes ... And Russia joined the sanctions against the DPRK precisely for this reason, “so that there is no war”, and not because of the fear that the United States will impose sanctions against Russia over Korea as well, joining the "universal" opinion, yes-ah ....
        1. +1
          2 September 2017 08: 42
          Well ... Sometimes you have good thoughts, but now this is clearly not the case.
          1. +1
            2 September 2017 10: 12
            You did not catch the "irony" .... wink
  2. +2
    1 September 2017 16: 17
    Maybe we’ll come to an agreement with the Japanese and ourselves to shoot down DPRK missiles that fly “to” and “through” the territory of Japan. After this comrade Kim dies during the day, or even in a shorter time period. In the meantime, there is a conspiracy between the United States and the DPRK to keep the entire region in suspense. Confirmation is at least unconfirmed, however, facts about the transfer of engines: who would believe that if there was such a transfer, then it passed without the knowledge of the United States? None. Of course, all this "fuss" is directed primarily against the PRC and Russia.
    Note.: South Koreans fellows, sent Americans from nuclear weapons to hell.
    1. +2
      1 September 2017 16: 33
      Quote: 1536
      Maybe we’ll come to an agreement with the Japanese and ourselves to shoot down DPRK missiles that fly “to” and “through” the territory of Japan. After this comrade Kim dies during the day, or even in a shorter time period. In the meantime, there is a conspiracy between the United States and the DPRK to keep the entire region in suspense. Confirmation is at least unconfirmed, however, facts about the transfer of engines: who would believe that if there was such a transfer, then it passed without the knowledge of the United States? None. Of course, all this "fuss" is directed primarily against the PRC and Russia.

      I’ve talked about collusion for a long time, but it’s still not worth knocking down North Korean missiles, just as our missiles cost money. There are hundreds of praised US destroyers with ,,,, better ,,,, as they say naval air defense, so let them knock down. But they will not do this since they pursue other goals.
    2. +4
      1 September 2017 17: 26
      Quote: 1536
      Maybe we’ll come to an agreement with the Japanese and ourselves to shoot down DPRK missiles that fly “to” and “through” the territory of Japan.

      Nonsense.
      Eun is a real man who was able to replace the US puppets - Japan and the South Caucasus, on the territory of which Washington military bases are located and more than 50 thousand soldiers are ready to strike at any time in Russia.
      So the tension in relations between the DPRK and the United States does not harm us much either.
      1. +3
        2 September 2017 06: 17
        Hello Comrade Vatnik! Problems at work - I have not visited the site for a long time. But I am glad to see your as always sensible comment !!

        In fact, we all understand that the DPRK was a project of the USSR and China against the United States
        But we lost and our USSR died and the DPRK remained almost "ownerless" but of course they are near China

        The propaganda of the USA and the West made monsters out of them and completely lied - unfortunately a lot of people, both here and in Russia, succumbed to Western propaganda
    3. +2
      1 September 2017 21: 49
      In the meantime, there is a conspiracy between the United States and the DPRK to keep the whole region in suspense.
      The original thought of tension. Let’s immediately talk about the collusion of NATO and Russia. What are the little things there.
    4. +1
      2 September 2017 05: 52
      Wow! Shoot down ... It remains only to decide what and how. Or do you think this is a long-resolved problem?
  3. +10
    1 September 2017 16: 25
    Quote: 1536
    Maybe negotiate with the Japanese and we ourselves to shoot down the DPRK missiles

    Are you serious? Have you decided to sign up for amer’s henchmen?
    DPRK launches missiles, as the Americans conduct a series of exercises! They were asked to stop - they say that they are all allowed. Kim is defending himself! And you are completely overwhelmed ... You will not strain less to vote in support of the USA!
    1. 0
      1 September 2017 16: 34
      Not of course gunpowder must be kept dry - this is a common truth, but why provoke. Somehow muddy.
      Bad direction. I don't believe it.
      1. 0
        1 September 2017 16: 52
        I add a bad game SGA.
        A country where people move from rice to water, where there are no sources of extraction of the necessary components, where there is no developed metallurgy. They stole something, and this also needs to be put into shelves, and this is decades.
        And here, right on the intercontinet, they waved.
        Neither Russia nor China can allow this DPRK, something overnight.
        The question remains: Who did this? And why.
        1. +2
          1 September 2017 17: 39
          Quote: VALERIK_097
          And here, right on the intercontinet, they waved.

          Well, not right away. We walked gradually.
          Quote: VALERIK_097
          Neither Russia nor China can allow this DPRK, that at once

          Duc, already ... In the sense - allowed (if not recommended). Yes
          Quote: VALERIK_097
          The question remains: Who did this? And why.

          Who! - See above. And for what? Duc, all for the sake of life on Earth. No kidding.
          1. +1
            1 September 2017 18: 29
            I agree, for the sake of life on earth, and I go over 190 MV, almost every day, it’s left, then, manko, physical, and immediately the energy start, in October we will give. Something like that.
      2. 0
        1 September 2017 17: 31
        Quote: VALERIK_097
        but why provoke. Somehow muddy

        To know and be afraid.
        1. 0
          1 September 2017 18: 45
          polite people as much as possible ....

          And who should be afraid ..? DPRK ..? Well, everything is as we see exactly the opposite. It’s not them, it’s just they’re afraid of them ...
          1. 0
            1 September 2017 19: 02
            Quote: igorj 51
            And who should be afraid ..? DPRK ..?

            They were afraid to attack the DPRK.
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      1 September 2017 17: 55
      Rudolph, all this is a big policy, at least I can’t even get a fingernail, but my specialization is PPU, PTU orders.
      AC-34, "Consul" in virtue of the profession, also passed through me. So for show))) Handed.
      I wouldn’t drive them on orders, it would be more useless. The director is rushing around, turned on manual control, I’m cool. I switched from the main orders for scrap. You can understand him, there’s logistics around him. Yes and I’m complete .. but .My team with a narrow specialization, vteteriruyut everything. That is possible. And in the brigade in fact 17 people. at the exit.
      Colleagues from Severodvinsk, put down cognac.
      You live in the North, you don’t see the sun, but we earn more, you earn
      1. +1
        1 September 2017 18: 10
        Anyway, there is positive for today, the daughter at the university 2 pairs (first) listened, how to determine it according to my criteria, not to understand.
        Maybe he’ll become smarter than his father.))))
        Father in her years served in the PV KGB of the USSR.
        1. +7
          1 September 2017 19: 12
          Quote: VALERIK_097
          Anyway, there is positive for today ...

          Valera, of course we congratulate you ..drinks . BUT IT IS NECESSARY TO BITE EVERYTHING !!! laughing
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. +1
            2 September 2017 03: 05
            Boa constrictor and Rudolph-Thank you guys for your congratulations.
            I revered my comment above, a little ashamed (I didn’t lie, but the hodgepodge turned out, I could no longer summarize and draw conclusions).
            Recipe: 3 kg awl + 1.5 kg. lingonberries + 1,5 kg. sugar. Insist 3 months. I have no alcohol meter, but I got a tasty compote. From it it was carried away unnoticed (even for my wife))))
            But the cognac remained in the safe at work, it was no longer a safe but a mini bar. It’s somehow not customary to use it at work anymore. But after 3 months I’ll print it))) I’ll give the brigade New Year, pension)))
  5. +2
    1 September 2017 16: 27
    Well, it’s like Koreans don’t plan to mock us, they’re kind of crazy
  6. 0
    1 September 2017 16: 28
    We don’t need to be afraid of anyone. We need to seriously work to constantly improve our SPRN (Missile Attack Warning System)
    And the Cossack is mishandled.
    And this is not a quotation out of context, this is his thinking.
    1. +1
      1 September 2017 17: 34
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      We don’t need to be afraid of anyone. We need to seriously work to constantly improve our SPRN (Missile Attack Warning System)
      And the Cossack is mishandled.
      And this is not a quotation out of context, this is his thinking.

      GUILTY, overexcited. I beg your pardon.
  7. +1
    1 September 2017 16: 41
    Quote: Dashout
    Quote: 1536
    Maybe negotiate with the Japanese and we ourselves to shoot down the DPRK missiles

    Are you serious? Have you decided to sign up for amer’s henchmen?
    DPRK launches missiles, as the Americans conduct a series of exercises! They were asked to stop - they say that they are all allowed. Kim is defending himself! And you are completely overwhelmed ... You will not strain less to vote in support of the USA!

    Well, I didn’t get sick ... Kim’s behavior doesn’t look like a “defense”. Do you seriously think that someone was going to attack the DPRK? It is very similar to the howl from the Baltic states about the Belarusian-Russian exercises. On the one hand, it distracts its own people from various uncomfortable issues, and on the other hand, it is guaranteed to pursue a policy of "deterring the aggressor". Only here the situation will be more complicated, because in the PRC, too, probably the majority of the population thinks that the small, proud DPRK is opposed to US hegemony. The only question is, and what is it, in fact, opposing? Americans don’t even have to spend money on medium-range missiles in the Far East, even if even our specialists talked about the "impossibility of an unexpected North Korean strike on our territory." If this blow is impossible, then what is it to talk about? And our vote at the UN on these issues? Think before you say that someone signed up for someone’s help. I do not pretend to the truth in the last resort, but facts are a stubborn thing. Who will invest in the border areas, and we border the DPRK if these border areas can become a front tomorrow?
    1. 0
      1 September 2017 18: 40
      First of all, it is necessary to remove the “Maryat” from the Barents Sea, it will be completely calm for everyone.
    2. +4
      1 September 2017 19: 48
      to 1536
      Right now I'm watching on TV 60 minutes. The liberal side yells with one voice - DO NOT TOUCH AMERICA, DO NOT RESPOND! Such a Trojan horse in Russia. I’m reading your post, and something similar ... causes associations with Apple.
      It was necessary to admit that voting for sanctions against the DPRK in conditions of completely untied America is a shame! It was necessary to insist on the withdrawal of American troops. They don’t want to - as they want ... their business ... But they don’t get involved, on the contrary, help the DPRK (up to organizing our base there).
  8. +2
    1 September 2017 16: 52
    will be warned. So what? "a rocket flies at you, come out, greet. in white sheets."
    have something to bring down? in the Far East? strategic ballistic missile?
  9. +6
    1 September 2017 16: 58
    May not be afraid, but fear must be ... careful God saves ..
  10. 0
    1 September 2017 17: 19
    Sergey Valentinovich, it's nice to see your face. Good luck and RTI them. Mintz. Remember our work together. I often remember you and Savchenko too. I have the honor.
  11. +1
    1 September 2017 17: 20
    Quote: 1536
    Who will invest in the border areas, and we border the DPRK if these border areas can become a front tomorrow?

    China is investing. populates. already. long.
  12. +1
    1 September 2017 17: 21
    In addition to the fact that C Korea violates the norms created by the West for third world countries, who does it attack? The situation is that in one country the same West helps with the creation of nuclear weapons and is silent, and harsh statements concern only those countries that are not subject to the West.
  13. +2
    1 September 2017 17: 27
    In general, the warning system DOES NOT WARRANT that missiles will not reach Russian cities. Still, it’s not enough to detect the target, it must still be brought down. But, frankly speaking, it is not the DPRK that needs to be feared, not their missiles. And the efforts of our "partners", these may well try ....
  14. +2
    1 September 2017 18: 25
    The SPRN will detect a missile, but in that region we don’t have anti-missile interceptors --- it’s a ballistic and complex target. I don’t have an S-500 in the army or navy, I hope so far, but Primorye is not Moscow with the adjacent Central Air Defense Area.
    1. +2
      1 September 2017 19: 35
      Our MIG-31 performs the role of air defense
    2. +1
      2 September 2017 11: 37
      Well, in principle, even the S-300 can intercept ballistic missiles, but they have restrictions on height and range. The S-400 also knows how to do this, but only do we have enough air defense data in that direction?
  15. +1
    1 September 2017 19: 34
    As long as they warm up the lamps in their rockets, they will be gone.
  16. +4
    1 September 2017 19: 56
    The Russian missile attack warning system provides protection against DPRK ballistic missiles,

    Ofigel I am from such a statement. It’s clear, Friday, but readers shouldn’t be considered full fills. Since when does the warning system provide protection? Holy spirit or what?

    Quote: Bronevick
    Our MIG-31 performs the role of air defense

    And what, the MIG-31 is already capable of shooting down ballistic missiles? By ramming, or what?
    1. 0
      1 September 2017 21: 39
      "The Russian missile attack warning system provides protection against DPRK ballistic missiles." Probably forgot to add - "Top management of the country."
    2. +1
      2 September 2017 11: 42
      Yes, comrade got excited, MIG-31s ​​are not intended for intercepting ballistic targets. Still, this is a complex of air defense of the country, and not missile defense.
  17. 0
    1 September 2017 20: 55
    For if something happens, the DPRK will arrange such a fucking that it will not seem enough. Russia is not the United States, and it does not need to worry about the security of Kazakhstan.
  18. 0
    2 September 2017 00: 35
    The situation is presented: a pair of hooligans provokes a teenager to a fight, and behind this teenager, two uncle-thugs, stand wrinkling and smiling sympathetically .... For some reason, it seems that everything that can be intercepted will be intercepted (if notified during)
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. 0
    2 September 2017 13: 08
    Quote: Topotun
    Well, in principle, even the S-300 can intercept ballistic missiles, but they have restrictions on height and range. The S-400 also knows how to do this, but only do we have enough air defense data in that direction?

    Unfortunately, all these systems are capable of intercepting only tactical and operational-tactical missiles. Moreover, the interception range of the S-300PM-2 ballistic targets reaches 40 km, the height is 25. The S-400 complex has a range of 60 and a height of 30, respectively.
  21. 0
    2 September 2017 22: 42
    DPRK is an ally of China, and China is not our ally, but a fellow traveler. When our paths diverge, we will need to defend ourselves from them.