Military Review

Putin: Russia calls for the creation of a broad anti-terrorism front

35
Russia calls "not in words, but in deeds" to begin the formation of a global anti-terrorist front on a generally recognized international legal basis, leads RIA News an article by Russian President Vladimir Putin, published on the eve of the BRICS summit.



In his article, the president also noted that, thanks to the actions of the Russian Federation and other interested countries, prerequisites had recently been created for improving the situation in Syria.

The fight against terrorists in Syria, in other countries and regions should be continued. Russia calls, not in words, but in deed to proceed to the formation of a broad antiterrorist front on a generally recognized international legal basis with the UN playing a central role. And in this regard, we naturally appreciate the support and assistance of the BRICS partners,
he noted.

Putin also praised China’s work as the BRICS chairman country this year, which, he said, made it possible to make serious progress “in all key areas of partnership - political, economic, humanitarian”.

I should add that the "five" has noticeably strengthened its position in the world,
declared the president.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
35 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 1 September 2017 15: 49
    +3
    Well, if GDP said, and Soros is recognized as a terrorist in the USA, then I’m for
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 1 September 2017 15: 53
      +5
      Mattresses and others like them will definitely not respond to such an appeal. They already have the International Coalition Against ISIS. We know how they really "fight." am
      1. Pirogov
        Pirogov 1 September 2017 16: 02
        +5
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Mattresses and others like them will definitely not respond to such an appeal. They already have the International Coalition Against ISIS. We know how they really "fight."

        But I don’t understand the meaning of calling anyone for something, if the answer and the result are clear in advance, the Raven will not peck out the crow's eye.
      2. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 1 September 2017 16: 09
        +2
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Mattresses and others like them will definitely not respond to such an appeal. They already have the International Coalition Against ISIS. We know how they really "fight." am

        Outrageous! Do not trust partners!
        We can not only doubt, but also draw conclusions ... Do you think that darling Trump is not ready to give his life "for his own"? .... (he has friends)
        Fu, imagined. Yes, he promised ISIS to reset, but then he promised again, and then he was distracted, Trump House was burned. Perhaps he thought hard. (and at that time ...)
        And because of such a trifle, you are making hasty conclusions. This is outrageous, after all.
      3. Masya masya
        Masya masya 1 September 2017 16: 52
        +6
        Hi! love
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        Mattresses and others like them will definitely not respond to such an appeal.

        Pasha, they will respond, then they will respond, only their words always diverge with deeds ...
        1. cniza
          cniza 1 September 2017 17: 53
          +2
          Here, they will only interfere.
          1. Masya masya
            Masya masya 1 September 2017 17: 59
            +6
            Quote: cniza
            Here, they will only interfere.

            Do not just interfere, but insert sticks into the wheels!
            1. cniza
              cniza 1 September 2017 18: 03
              +2
              They will work on two fronts, and then, as always, they will join the winners.
        2. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 1 September 2017 20: 53
          +1
          Hi Marisha! hi love Let them not respond better: friends should be kept close, enemies should be even closer, and it is better not to have such "friends" like mattresses. And if they are there - to keep them closer than enemies. soldier
          1. Masya masya
            Masya masya 1 September 2017 21: 31
            +4
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            friends must be kept close, enemies - even closer

            lol
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 1 September 2017 21: 34
              +2
              You got me, however. Now I'm sitting and thinking: who is more dangerous? "Friends" mattresses or madam? recourse
              1. Masya masya
                Masya masya 1 September 2017 21: 39
                +4
                Quote: bouncyhunter
                who is more dangerous? "Friends" mattresses or madam

                Madame is dearer! And the states, pah ... grind and forget ... request
                1. bouncyhunter
                  bouncyhunter 1 September 2017 21: 44
                  +1
                  So it’s clear that it’s dearer. Which does not at all mean a higher level of security compared to star-striped orcs. lol
                  1. Masya masya
                    Masya masya 1 September 2017 21: 54
                    +4
                    Quote: bouncyhunter
                    Which does not at all mean a higher level of security compared to star-striped orcs.

                    Orcs are fictional creatures .... you should not take into account ... especially since these orcs, on their territory, the devil will break his leg ...
  2. 1536
    1536 1 September 2017 16: 01
    +4
    Quote: bouncyhunter
    Mattresses and others like them will definitely not respond to such an appeal. They already have the International Coalition Against ISIS. We know how they really "fight." am

    So this is the trick that many people in the World read the word “anti-retreatist” as “anti-American” [front]. It is just too early to speak about it publicly and at the highest level, although it is unlikely that anything will change in the near future, and sooner or later it will still have to be said about it.
    1. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 1 September 2017 16: 12
      +1
      Correct the error, and so (+).
      Well, pessimism "early" is not our method. Already, as you say, smart ones understand.
      1. 1536
        1536 1 September 2017 16: 13
        +1
        Late, those who need it will understand.
  3. Altona
    Altona 1 September 2017 16: 23
    +2
    Quote: bouncyhunter
    Mattresses and others like them will definitely not respond to such an appeal.

    ------------------------------
    How can you fight with those whom you yourself have fed and raised with such difficulty? ISIS is US ground forces in the BV.
    1. Kasym
      Kasym 2 September 2017 23: 45
      +1
      BV business will not end. North Africa, Southeast Asia and ... Europe. But it seems to me that the Kremlin’s appeal is directed primarily to the PRC and India. And the first priority is Afghanistan. It is this country that affects all three in terms of terror, the training of barmaleis and drugs like Fin. support. Even Beijing feels it. We, in the CSTO, Tajiks border.
      You can spit on the Yankees if Kabul gives the go-ahead. It is possible to act simultaneously, as in Syria. This is a power option. But we need to find out the issue with the Taliban. Enemies or you can agree (they will accept the Constitution or want Sharia, sometimes interpreted by them)?
      Let's see what Beijing and Delhi will answer, and are they ready for real action - after all, all the barmalei are worried ?! XUAR for Beijing, Jammu and Kashmir for Delhi; no need to write for us. hi
      In Afghanistan, the States seem to be fighting - so let's see where they have their own. Although I really do not want to go there - it may still be possible to put everyone at the same table and make peace - they themselves will deal with the newcomers.
  4. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 1 September 2017 16: 33
    +4
    It is necessary to call for an improvement in the living conditions of the population, and of everything, and not for individual representatives, and for the eradication of social inequality, because it is these factors that influence the emergence and spread of terrorism. For how many do not destroy the terrorists, while maintaining these conditions, more and more new ones will appear
    1. urapatriot
      urapatriot 1 September 2017 16: 50
      +2
      I agree! Terrorism is a social disease and cannot be cured with calibers.
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 1 September 2017 18: 01
        0
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        to improve the living conditions of the population, and of everything, and not individual representatives, and to eradicate social inequality, because it is these factors that influence the emergence and spread of terrorism.

        I almost agree, but terrorism now, is just one of the tools of big players to solve their geopolitical problems. If the interests of local bandits coincide with the wishes of power rulers from large and cultural capitals, then scatter bagels with bagels over this area --- it will not give silence and peace.
        This is one layer where terrorism shows its essence as a cruel, but effective way to influence another country without involving its own armed forces.
        But there is another layer in this “bitter onion” that is inside and which is the core of this terrible phenomenon. It lies in the very nature of a person who lives in a civilized society woven from thousands of taboos. Prohibitions and norms are necessary for people, otherwise would live like in a wild forest. This is good, but with a side effect: all unfulfilled desires (to achieve fame, honor and respect, or to challenge all conventions, for example) --- all this is hidden in the subconscious of a simple, small person --- and the preachers radical currents promise liberation from this inferiority, totally master the will of man. They and "paradise happiness" promise freedom to the neophyte and at the same time severely stigmatize the existing order.
        Therefore, everything is a little more complicated and is not limited only to material wealth. From prosperous Europe, people are sent to the bloody chaos of the Syrian (or some other war) --- and these are not only newly arrived Arabs, but also “Europeans” (in several generations, with a good education and abundance).
        And there are a few other important aspects of terrorism, but these are the root ones.
        1. Alena Frolovna
          Alena Frolovna 1 September 2017 20: 26
          +2
          Terrorism is a social disease


          And today is MEMORY Day - the tragedy of BESLAN.

          And as Yevtushenko wrote:

          There is no excuse for all of us today
          because it is possible on earth.


          Eternal memory to all those who died at the hands of terrorists, to all our soldiers who stood up for protection and at the cost of their lives saved many, including us all.
          Everlasting memory!
          1. bouncyhunter
            bouncyhunter 1 September 2017 21: 31
            +1
            Your truth, Alena! hi love During these ups and downs, they almost forgot about the tragedy of Beslan. I join your words.
  5. serriy
    serriy 1 September 2017 16: 46
    0
    Well, since America is the main sponsor of terrorism, the call is really good.
    only there is no specifics.
  6. APASUS
    APASUS 1 September 2017 17: 27
    0
    I think if Putin drags China into Syria, even under the pretext of dividing the country (I think Syria will nevertheless break up). The world map may change dramatically in the coming years, the alignment of forces will change dramatically.
  7. asushnik 78
    asushnik 78 1 September 2017 17: 28
    +1
    Russia has no allies to fight the United States!
  8. Flatter
    Flatter 1 September 2017 18: 41
    0
    Admission to bank accounts will make it possible to determine the sponsors of terrorists. That's just none of the serious investors, nor banks will agree. Banks are sponsors of terrorism.
  9. Esoteric
    Esoteric 1 September 2017 19: 01
    0
    What is the use of calling? It is necessary to create a coalition to fight and improve the interaction of troops in real combat conditions. It’s hard to carry the fighters against terrorism alone ...
  10. earloop
    earloop 1 September 2017 21: 02
    0
    "calls" not in words but in action "to begin the formation of a global anti-terrorism front on a universally recognized international legal basis" - In the current conditions, without such a global front, it is impossible to ensure the normal life of the population of a particular state. But this is not enough. It is necessary to deal with the aggressive imposition of shit democracy in other countries.
  11. Slovak
    Slovak 2 September 2017 00: 51
    0
    It’s empty. The United States will not give up. Is it in vain that they produce ISIS around the world?
  12. LeonidL
    LeonidL 2 September 2017 03: 26
    +2
    Good deal !! Well done !!!
  13. high
    high 2 September 2017 05: 09
    0
    It is necessary to define what terrorism is ....
    For example, the Arab countries, Canada, the USA, Israel .... consider Hezbollah as terrorists, and Russia does not think so ...

    Hisbollah hijacks planes, makes bombings at foreign embassies, kidnaps diplomats and kills them (Katkov - USSR). kills his Prime Minister in Lebanon Hariri, blew up an Israeli tourist bus in Bulgaria ....
    Like the terrorists ....
  14. ilimnoz
    ilimnoz 2 September 2017 06: 56
    0
    what a coalition. Well, include the West and the USA there, but the point. saying they will do one thing another hypocrisy. the unions of the past and the century before last were much fairer, so to speak. it was clear who was achieving what, who had won and who had lost. and now the loser declares himself the winner and demands grandmas for his loss.
  15. Bert
    Bert 2 September 2017 13: 42
    0
    Quote: bouncyhunter
    You got me, however. Now I'm sitting and thinking: who is more dangerous? "Friends" mattresses or madam? recourse

    Something seems like "friends." Since they are “friends” they have not yet grabbed a hand right down to the shirt.