Crimean authorities have announced the failure of the project of Kiev on television to the peninsula

33
The broadcasting of TV channels from Ukraine did not start in Crimea, the next anti-Crimean project of the Kiev authorities failed, said Deputy Prime Minister of the Crimean Government - Minister of Internal Policy, Information and Communication of the Republic Dmitry Polonsky.

We remind you that earlier Sergey Kostinsky, a member of the National Council of Ukraine on Television and Radio Broadcasting, on his Facebook page in mid-August reported that five Ukrainian TV channels began broadcasting to the Crimea from the Chongarsky tower in the Kherson region. According to him, from September 1 multiplex will start to work in standard mode with power 0,3 kW, and from November 1 - with power 1 kW, Ukrainian channels will be able to watch in Krasnoperekopsk and Dzhankoy regions.

Crimean authorities have announced the failure of the project of Kiev on television to the peninsula


There will be no difference between the test broadcasting, as they call it, and broadcasting on an ongoing basis, because neither the one nor the other has existed in the Crimea. All the projects that the Ukrainian side is preparing in relation to the Crimea or Crimeans, they are all failed initially. This failure is provided, first of all, by one - the attitude of the Crimeans themselves to the processes that occur in Ukraine
- said Polonsky.

He said that the Kiev authorities could continue to mislead the Ukrainian people, but the Crimeans do not care.

If colleagues continue to deceive their citizens in the same way, this is their problem. We are on this stories do not feel any: neither test nor constant
- the vice-premier emphasized, transfers RIA News
  • http://www.globallookpress.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    1 September 2017 15: 04
    With what fanfare they shouted at all corners that the Crimeans would run back to the Outskirts from the "slop Raska". But it turns out somehow the opposite. And the money ran out for propaganda.
    1. +6
      1 September 2017 15: 31
      Once Ukraine itself closed political blah blah shows, where one could laugh. Now nothing interesting is left at all.
    2. +6
      1 September 2017 15: 59
      In general, the endless attempts of the Kiev authorities should be treated very skeptically. Total theft under any pretext, knowing the Ukrainians ’weakness for a freebie, they are perfectly handled by the Valtsmans and the like.
      1. +3
        2 September 2017 03: 39
        Ukrainian television ??? Well and well, there are still miserable people living in the last century, the hand of zapadestnyh rogues is visible. In principle, there is the Internet, but what gives ukroSMI the name of Goebbels is so miserable that it causes either hysterical laughter or gagging.
  2. +1
    1 September 2017 15: 06
    Whole 1 kW of power? Are you seriously?
    1. +8
      1 September 2017 15: 11
      Quote: bagr69
      ...Seriously?

      Of course this is serious. 1 kW = 1000 W = 1000000 mW = 1000000000 μW.
      1. +4
        1 September 2017 15: 18
        Actually, the physical order. we know how to operate quantities (it’s not worth clevering), the question is that where are they going to broadcast at such power? On a nearby village?
        1. +8
          1 September 2017 15: 34
          I wasn’t smart, I was kidding. And now I'm smart. A kilowatt VHF transmitter with an antenna height of 12 meters provides stable communication for 100 - 120 km (depends on reception conditions). Broadcast this crap (about which the article) were going much higher. So, a radius of 300 km is quite secure.
          1. +1
            1 September 2017 15: 40
            I reason like a layman. In the main altar on the Ostankino TV tower several hundred meters high, there is a transmitter with a power of 10 kW, the signal is already weakening in Klin (80 km), and practically absent at the border of the Tver region (100 km). What to do with this?
            1. +3
              1 September 2017 15: 57
              I assume that the question here is not the transmitter power, but the condition for receiving the signal. It makes sense to use not a piece of wire with beer cans, but a directional antenna. It is advisable that she look towards Ostankino, without resting against the neighboring wall or the trees, and if she is also with an amplifier, then .....
              1. 0
                2 September 2017 00: 31
                I assume that the question here is not the transmitter power, but the condition for receiving the signal.

                You are right.
                There is an old simple formula for the line of sight (taking into account refraction) 4,15 times the sum of the roots from the heights of the front and rear antennas. (Heights in meters, range in km)
                For Ostankino, it’s about 97 km. And power - 1 kW with directional antennas with decent KND with Mars can be contacted.
              2. +5
                2 September 2017 01: 11
                Quote: colonel
                I assume that the question here is not the transmitter power, but the condition for receiving the signal. It makes sense to use not a piece of wire with beer cans, but a directional antenna. It is advisable that she look towards Ostankino, without resting against the neighboring wall or the trees, and if she is also with an amplifier, then .....


                laughing laughing laughing
              3. 0
                2 September 2017 02: 08
                So the question is big, whether they will direct, put the amplifier and generally bother ...
          2. 0
            1 September 2017 17: 25
            300 km will not provide. For the VHF range, the zone of less than Malomals confident reception of programs is 50-70 km. The transmitter power will ensure normal reproduction only at the boundaries of these designated 50-70 km. Beyond this border, taking programs is problematic because of the terrain. Something like this...
        2. 0
          1 September 2017 16: 29
          Quote: bagr69
          ... at such power, where are they going to broadcast? On a nearby village?



          ... from November 1 - with a capacity of 1 kW, Ukrainian channels will be able to watch in Krasnoperekopsky and Dzhankoy regions

          in these areas, people (about 250 thousand) themselves will be able to compare where the truth is and where the propaganda ...
          if, of course, they want to ...
    2. +1
      1 September 2017 15: 33
      A kilowatt is enough to heat the kettle. laughing Another thing is if they put a hundred diesel mobile repeaters along the border with the Crimea, then they will get 15 kilometers.
  3. 0
    1 September 2017 15: 09
    I wonder why they do not broadcast to Ukraine? After all, it is possible to set repeaters on the borders of the repeater and crush soft power.
    1. +3
      1 September 2017 15: 15
      Already build. 4Q It will hit right up to Kharkov.
    2. +3
      1 September 2017 15: 20
      Yes, they are already aware of everything, the benefit is that millions of Ukrainians are in Russia. Plus the Internet, etc.
      1. +2
        1 September 2017 17: 46
        on the Internet you can watch live broadcast of any country in the world. for example http://www.interntv.ru/index.php?name=View&id
        tv = 1510
    3. +2
      1 September 2017 16: 03
      Do we need it? Anyone who wants to look on the Internet or visit our site.
  4. 0
    1 September 2017 15: 55
    with a power of 1 kW, - actually for VHF, this is dofiga, and for UHF even more.
    But, this is only in line of sight 20km, maximum up to 90km from the tower, ideally ... not counting reflections, mountains, etc. ....
    Coverage (approximate) can be found here https://satmaster.kiev.ua/category/t2-televidenie
    -pokrytie-v-ukraine

    And broadcasting is from the satellite in open form from "Astra 4A (Sirius)" and much further than Crimea
    the list of channels and the broadcast language is here http://installsat.tv/spisok-kanalov-sputnika/sput
    nik-astra-4a /
    and the coverage map here http://installsat.tv/karta-pokrytija-sputnika/spu
    tnik-astra-4a /

    comments are said unnecessarily ...
    1. 0
      1 September 2017 16: 44
      a satellite needs a dish and a receiver ...
      1. 0
        1 September 2017 17: 04
        Today it’s a penny, a simple set of less than $ 50
        ($ 38,65. Set for self-installation on one TV for reception from 3 satellites: Hotbird (13.0 ° E), Astra 4A (4.8 ° E), Amos (4.0 ° W). 1500 channels or more without a monthly fee, and more than 80 in Russian and Ukrainian languages ​​.. of all channels) -Russian, it’s very debatable here - you can count on the fingers of one hand ...
        a decent dual-band antenna with an amplifier will cost the same money ...
        1. 0
          1 September 2017 18: 58
          Quote: Popovich
          Today it’s a penny, a simple set of less than $ 50

          not everyone can screw a plate on the balcony, and sometimes you just can’t get to the roof of a high-rise building ...
          a decent dual-band antenna with an amplifier will cost the same money ...

          I can’t understand something, why invest now in a decent dual-band antenna, if in the foreseeable future the transition to digital ...
  5. +5
    1 September 2017 16: 05
    And the money is bye ... wink
  6. +9
    1 September 2017 16: 33
    Relatives in the capital of Crimea sometimes watch Ukrainian 1 + 1 on cable, they say that the best anti-propaganda of the US-Kiev regime is not necessary. Watching the ukronostov mostly causes a sense of humor or disgust.
    1. +4
      1 September 2017 16: 47
      Quote: Elephant
      Relatives in the capital of Crimea sometimes watch Ukrainian 1 + 1 on cable, they say that the best anti-propaganda of the US-Kiev regime is not necessary. Watching the ukronostov mostly causes a sense of humor or disgust.


      sometimes it’s useful to watch and listen to “enemy stations” ... vaccination against “Ukrainian cholera”
  7. +3
    1 September 2017 17: 32
    Honestly, there are more than enough channels on the Internet. So these towers were originally like cutting money.
  8. +1
    1 September 2017 17: 43
    Yes, everything there, in the Crimea, you could watch, you can now watch.
    it’s just like some money, they drank some noise and reported, they were probably allocated to fight Russian propaganda.
    and here they’ll steal, they’ll shout here - it’s no sense from the declared actions, but they put the daw in the statements, but in their pockets there were trochies ... for those involved)) to the show.
  9. +3
    1 September 2017 18: 09
    The grandmother who climbs on the roof seems bad ... climbs on the roof, turn the analog antenna towards the Bandero mast. If only because my grandmother and grandson have long presented and set a plate with a receiver. And my grandmother put on dill broadcasting, banks with an autumn twist smile
  10. +2
    2 September 2017 03: 35
    Yes, another "zrado-peremoga", and then the money has already flowed into someone's pocket? But this is good news, the more "zrado-overwhelmed", the closer the collapse of the clown regime in Kuev.
  11. +1
    2 September 2017 20: 16
    As a resident of Crimea, I personally absolutely "give a damn about" all these attempts. I have no time to watch TV. There are problems above the roof. And who is there, what is broadcasting, is absolutely not up to it.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"