His Majesty's Dreadnought Ship and Prankers of the Year 1910

43


At that point in time (1906 year), His Majesty's Dreadnought (Fearless) Ship was a very interesting ship. It was the British battleship, the ancestor of the new subclass of battleships of the “dreadnought type”, named after him.



It became the first ship in the world to build the so-called “all-big-gun” principle (“only big guns”) - it included ten 305-mm guns and no intermediate-caliber guns.

"Dreadnought" also became the world's first battleship with a steam-turbine power plant, which provided him with a very high speed in those times in the 21 node.
Thanks to speed and ten 305-mm 45-caliber guns Mk X in the five two-gun towers had undeniable tactical advantages over the battleships of the time.

The creation of the ship "Dreadnought" is closely linked with the name of John Fisher.
His Majesty's Dreadnought Ship and Prankers of the Year 1910

Sir John Arbethnot "Jackie" Fisher, 1-th Baron Fisher of Quilverstone


Being the admiral of the Royal British Navy fleet, he had a huge impact on the tactics, strategy, development and logistics of the Royal Navy.

Born in 1841, Knight (1894), Baron (1909).

In Service (1854), Officer (1860), Rear Admiral (1890), Vice Admiral (1896), Admiral (1902) and Admiral of the Fleet of Great Britain (1905).

Took part in Crimean (1853-1856) and English-Chinese (1859-1860) Wars, Egyptian Expedition (1882)

Director of the Marine Artillery Department (1886-1891). Admiral-Superintendent of the Portsmouth Docks (1891). 3 Lord Admiralty (1892-1897). Commander-in-Chief of the North American and West Indies Station (1897 — 1899). Commander in Chief of the Mediterranean Fleet (1899 — 1902). Commander in Portsmouth (1903 − 1904). First Sea Lord from 20 October 1904 of the Year to 25 January 1910 of the Year and in 1914 — 1915.

He was a supporter of the development of submarine and aircraft-carrying warships. Thanks to him, by the summer of 1914, the British Navy was fully converted to liquid fuel. The rest of the world for a long time shoveling coal.

By order of the king Edward VII, Admiralty Council 6 December 1904 of the year established a special committee for the design of new ships. Fisher became its chairman.

The tasks of the committee included the development of tactical and technical tasks for new ships - battleships, cruisers, destroyers and submarines. Formally, the committee’s decisions were of a recommendatory nature, and the chief builder of the fleet, Philip Watts, was officially responsible for the projects. In fact, the opinion of the committee, which was formed under the direction of Fisher, was perceived by the chief builder as a guide to action.

The first meeting of the committee took place on January 3 1905. Fisher announced the decision of the Fleet Council, in which it was said that the future battleship should have 21-nodal speed and weapons from 305-mm guns. The number of main and mine caliber guns should have been as large as possible. The battleship was supposed to fit freely in the docks of the main bases of the fleet - Portsmouth, Davenport, Gibraltar and Malta.

The committee reviewed a number of projects and by January 25 made its choice. February 21 reviewed and clarified details. The construction of the Dreadnought was entrusted to the Royal Shipyard in Portsmouth. The total contract cost of building the ship left 1 672 483 pounds sterling, guns - 113 200 pounds sterling.

Officially, the Dreadnought was laid on October 2 1905. In fact, the harvesting work began in the first days of May 1905. At the time of laying a huge part of the cut sheet material was on the stocks.

Under the direct supervision of Fisher, organizational measures were taken that made it possible to achieve a very high rate of work. By the official bookmark date, 1100 people were already working on the construction site. The workers' working week lasted six days from 6 in the morning until six in the evening. A timely supply of materials was organized.

2 October 1905 of the year on the slipway, surrounded by forests and full-turning cranes, already stood the wreck of the future ship - box-shaped keel beam, parts of the outer plating, bottom and zygomatic stringers, removed floric and bracket frames to the level of the lower shelf of the armor belt - about XNUM aft, two internal transverse bulkheads were installed.


4 October 1905 year, 2 day after bookmark. Almost all the lower parts of the frames in place, partially fastened with rivets.


After the official bookmark date, the number of employees was brought to 3 thousand people.


7 October 1906 of the year, 5 days after the bookmark. All frames and beams for installing armor deck in their seats


To simplify the procurement operations at the stage of preparing working drawings, the number of standard sizes of steel profiles was significantly reduced. The number of steel sheet thicknesses was also reduced to a minimum.


36 days after bookmark. Almost all armor plates on the bevels and the horizontal part of the armor deck and most of the beams for the main deck are installed.


The measures taken turned out to be enough to set a record of the pace of construction of a large ship, not beaten to this day.

10 February 1906 of the Year The Dreadnought was launched. The ceremony was conducted by King Edward VII. And already 3 October 1906, the ship went into service. Thus, officially the period of its construction was one year and one day.

If you count from the date of laying the first sheet on the stocks, from May 1905 of the year to December 1906 of the year when the preparation of the Dreadnought for the Atlantic march was completed, you get 20 months. And if you count up to the date of commissioning as a combat unit, then all 23. But even this period is an outstanding result, given the number of fundamentally new solutions used on the ship.


HMS Dreadnought in 1906 year


The construction of the Dreadnought has become a significant event in shipbuilding. After the appearance of the Dreadnought, all the leading naval powers of the world began to build battleships, which, like him, had the main armament of one-caliber guns. By the name of their ancestor, these ships received the nominal name "Dreadnoughts."

The maritime arms race before the First World War led to the emergence of "super-dreadnoughts" with weapons from 343-mm and 381-mm guns. Against them, the Dreadnought looked less powerful, so in Jutland battle, the largest in the First World War, the progenitor of the class was in the “second line” and did not take part in the fight.

The only fighting achievement of the Dreadnought was the successful ram of a German submarine. "U-29"commanded by al-submariner Otto Weddigen, at the beginning of the war in one day, sank three British armored cruisers: Abukir, who are "Cressy"and "Hog"...

* * *


This February 1910 day turned out to be particularly cold and windy in Portsmouth. Dreadnought Commander, Captain (rank in the British fleet; in the Russian fleet it corresponds to the rank of captain of the 1 rank) Sir Herbert Richmond, read into the telegram just delivered by the police officer from the radio room. The telegram reported that the ship would soon be granted a visit by the Abyssinian royal family. The fuss that had risen on the battleship did not give way to the description: it was necessary not to lose face and carefully prepare for the arrival of such distinguished guests. It was even involved His Majesty orchestra of the Navy. In his repertoire was the anthem of Zanzibar, and the ship's captenarmus had a zanzibar flag in the storeroom. In the absence of Abyssinian satisfied with these.

Guests of honor arrived. Four bearded dark-skinned people in luxurious oriental robes and turban boarded the battleship aboard the battleship. They were accompanied by a smart interpreter and a gloomy guard.




Sir Herbert Richmond personally conducted a tour of the battleship for the royal family listening to him. The guests nodded approvingly as they talked on their Abyssinian and admired what they had seen, exclaiming at times: “Bunga! Bunga! ”...

The distinguished guests refused lunch: the translator explained that the royal family does not have lunch with strangers. When the guests of honor finally left, the commander of the Dreadnought and his assistants breathed a sigh of relief. Looks like the visit was top notch.

A few days later, a telegram arrived from London stating that the Abyssinian delegation was not a delegation at all, but a bunch of jokers ...

Yes, prankers were not born today. Nothing that they then used not the telephone, as is customary today at the pranker, but the telegraph. We will not be too penny-wise, but let us pay tribute to the British aristocrat, the poet and the great lover of practical jokes who had masterfully spent all this disgrace William Horace de Vir Cole.

One of the "Abyssinians" was a woman, the beginning writer Virginia Stephen. It will take quite a bit of time and she will become a great writer - Virginia Woolf.


Virginia Woolf writer profile - natural and in image


The Abyssinian language, spoken by the guests, was a simple mixture of Latin and abracadabra. To refuse a solemn dinner of jokers forced concern for the makeup: suddenly beards will come off!

On his return to London, the joker-aristocrat told the story of the newspaper raffle. Daily Mirror and sent there photos, after which the British Navy for many months turned into a mockery. Cole, in fact, in this saw the goal of the enterprise - to prove how easily you can, if you wish, penetrate important military installations. And that, for example, for German intelligence, it is not difficult.

The authorities tried to find an article in the law, according to which the joker and his friends could be judged, but, unfortunately, they did not formally violate the law. A visit to the Dreadnought was Cole's biggest draw. (He was followed by other sins: when he was a student Cambridge university he visited him in the form of the Sultan of Zanzibar; another time, with friends disguised as road workers, dug up Piccadilly - one of the widest and busiest streets in Westminster, the historical center of London. But on Dreadnought Cole surpassed himself.)


One of the many cartoons of the rally. The inscription above literally translates as: "Burned with milk, blow on the water." On the 1-th picture: "Fake Abyssinian delegation." On 2: "What happens the next time some real eastern prince decides to visit a British warship."


It is said that when a real emperor of Ethiopia visited Britain a couple of years later, he was denied a tour of the Dreadnought, and English children welcomed his motorcade with shouts of “Bunga! Bunga! ”...

* * *


For those interested: a bunch of photos from the time of construction of this battleship:


Very beautiful and quite detailed his 3D model:


Sources:
Wikipedia articles, Internet publishing.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    4 September 2017 05: 48
    Alexander, bravo !!! He made me laugh. good good
    ==============================================
    The construction timeline is really surprising.
    1. +1
      4 September 2017 05: 57
      On the 3D model, what are the grids on the struts on the sides? Anti-torpedo?
      Who can explain?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        4 September 2017 07: 34
        Yes. The then chip. On many large ships, holders for nets are visible.
        1. +1
          4 September 2017 07: 40
          Quote: Ken71
          Yes. Then chip

          Something is now thought about this "chip" for the infamous Arctic convoys. what
          1. +2
            4 September 2017 08: 20
            It was only set in a parking lot. So it doesn’t roll.
          2. +2
            4 September 2017 09: 21
            Something is now thought about this "chip" for the infamous Arctic convoys.

            Anti-torpedo nets significantly reduced ship speed and were usually parked.
            1. +7
              4 September 2017 11: 38
              Quote: Razvedka_Boem
              Anti-torpedo nets significantly reduced ship speed and were usually parked.

              There was another problem - with the growth of mass and speed of torpedoes, ship anti-torpedo networks became less and less effective. In addition, network cutters appeared on the torpedoes.
              The conflicting opinions of experts who have summarized the experience of the Russo-Japanese war on the appropriateness of barriers forced the MTK to consider this issue in detail. For this reason, in September 1904, a series of experiments were carried out on the battleship “The Twelve Apostles”, firing torpedoes in the sample of 1898 and 1904 in the net. The main goal was to determine the adequacy of the strength of the network panels and the length of the poles (6 m). Moreover, there were fears that torpedoes, falling into the area of ​​the lower edge of the network, pulled it to the side.
              The first two rounds of a torpedo sample of 1898 (speed 29 knots, weight 440 kg) the network (weight of the cloth 180 kg) withstood. With two torpedo shots of the 1904 specimen (speed 32 knots, weight 656 kg) it turned out that in the first case the torpedo didn’t reach the side of the 0,9 m network, and in the second case the torpedo cut off in the network with suspensions 25 pendants, reaching almost to the side.
              In the same month, the Sevastopol sighting station conducted another series of experiments, having made 47 shots. Torpedoes, which had a speed of 31 knots, but already equipped with Japanese-style scissors, easily pierced panels with a ring diameter of 6 cm. Other types of even the heaviest nets could not withstand these torpedoes.
              Protection from a double row of light nets (diameter of rings 16 cm) turned out to be more effective, but their placement on ships due to the extreme complexity of the pole system and mast was considered unacceptable. At a meeting on August 17, 1905, the MTK refused network protection. Then they decided not to put the nets on the new ships, the cruisers Ochakov and Cahul, and remove them from the battleship Glory. At the same time, a tender was announced for the design of lightweight network floating booms.
          3. +4
            4 September 2017 14: 19
            The First World War confirmed that anti-torpedo networks no longer save ships from new types of torpedo weapons. An example is the attack of the German U-21 submarine under the command of Herzing of the English battleship Triumph. On May 25, 1915, at the entrance to the Dardanelles near Gaba-Tepe, the Triemph fired on Turkish positions on the Gallipoli Peninsula. At 11 hours 23 min. The battleship was attacked by a German boat U-21 from a pistol distance of 300 meters. The Triemph stood with its anti-torpedo nets down; the destroyer was constantly circulating around him; observers sat on the rods (shots) of the nets.
            However, a torpedo equipped with a “scissors” type cutter opened the network and hit the center of the ship’s hull. As soon as the column of water from the explosion had settled, the armadillo already had a 10-degree roll. After 21 minutes, the Triamph sank aft up.

            The unexpected second advent of anti-torpedo networks occurred during World War II. Since the losses of merchant ships from the attacks of German boats were very large, the British Admiralty decided to equip some valuable merchant ships with a displacement of more than 8000 tons with anti-torpedo nets. In total, 768 ships were equipped with such protection. 21 of them were subjected to a torpedo attack, and 5 ships of the network were saved.
            Here is an example of an attack from one of them. CMS (catapult merchant ship) "Fidelity" (2500 tons, former French Le Rhin) under the command of Lieutenant Peri was included in the convoy ONS-154. Before leaving, this ship was equipped with anti-torpedo nets. On December 29, 1942, the U-225 submarine under the command of Leimkühler attacked Fidelity at 21.38, and then also U-615 Kapitsky fired a total of 5 torpedoes on the ship. But all the torpedoes fell on the net, which saved the ship. Nevertheless, the Germans managed to sink Fidelity, but only on December 30 at 16.38 U-435 Strelof hit two torpedoes into the unprotected part of the vessel.
            However, this method of protection did not receive proper distribution. The main speed of the high-speed convoy of the Second World War is 11-15 knots, slow-moving - 6-8 knots. Since at such speeds there was a danger of winding the nets onto the screws or their damage due to the pressure of the oncoming water flow, most vessels were not equipped with this protective device. Practice has shown that the best defense of a single vessel from a torpedo attack is anti-submarine zigzag and high speed.
            © Sergey Makhov
      3. +2
        4 September 2017 11: 13
        Quote: Corporal
        On the 3D model, what are the grids on the struts on the sides? Anti-torpedo?
        Who can explain?

        On the grids already explained. Somewhere I came across information that these were not just grids, but similar to the Rabitz. They were made of fairly strong wire, but because of their flexibility, it was more convenient to lift them to the surface position. For this purpose, special winches were used.
    2. +6
      4 September 2017 11: 32
      Quote: Corporal
      The construction timeline is really surprising.

      So on Fischer’s favorite toy all his strength was thrown. For the sake of the Dreadnought, the Agamemnon and Lord Nelson under construction by the EDB were literally “stripped” - the GK towers ordered for them went to the new LC.
      By the way, if not for these towers, the Dreadnought would have been commissioned somewhere in 1908.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +1
    4 September 2017 06: 47
    This vessel under the specious excuse otmazatsya from the only battle for which it was created.
    Or maybe it was his 10 * 305mm that would decide the fate of the battle of Jutland. Although, rather, rather the fate of Hohzeeflot (I hope correctly read) could be decided by signalmen. How many times did squadrons cross each other’s columns there at night?
    1. +3
      4 September 2017 07: 36
      The vessel by that time was pretty outdated. But the battle would have accepted. If there was an opportunity.
    2. +2
      4 September 2017 11: 43
      Quote: demiurg
      This vessel under the specious excuse otmazatsya from the only battle for which it was created.
      Or maybe it was his 10 * 305mm that would decide the fate of the battle of Jutland. Although, rather, rather the fate of Hohzeeflot (I hope correctly read) could be decided by signalmen. How many times did squadrons cross each other’s columns there at night?

      The book 100 Great Ships states that during the Battle of Jutland, the Dreadnought was being repaired.
      1. 0
        4 September 2017 12: 54
        Quote: A. Privalov

        The book 100 Great Ships states that during the Battle of Jutland, the Dreadnought was being repaired.


        Quote: Ken71
        The vessel by that time was pretty outdated. But the battle would have accepted. If there was an opportunity.

        So I say, otmazatsya under a plausible pretext :))
        How to drive poor Veddigen completely into the water is easy. How to meet with big uncles so immediately to repair))
  4. +3
    4 September 2017 07: 48
    Thank you, Alexander, very interesting. By the way, there is an outstanding solo performance "Dreadnought", the author and performer E. Grishkovets, if you did not watch, I advise you to watch. The play has a lot of interesting things about the Navy of Britain and Germany at the beginning of the 20 century.
    1. +1
      4 September 2017 11: 17
      Thank. I will listen to your recommendation and will definitely look.
  5. +1
    4 September 2017 08: 12
    Quote: Corporal
    Alexander, bravo !!! Made me laugh

    The Examiner is British.
    The Dreadnought is certainly an outstanding ship. As I read in the "Model Designer" for ... a year that there is an irony of fate that a ship intended for artillery combat sank a submarine with a ramming strike wink
    1. +2
      4 September 2017 10: 08
      Quote: kvs207
      As I read in Model Designer for ... a year that there is an irony of fate that a ship intended for artillery combat sank a submarine with a ramming strike

      Stepanov-Ships and battles. There I read the irony of fate. The ancestor of the class, an artillery ship sank one of the most successful submarines (which drowned the 3 cruiser in an hour), designed to hit the enemy only with large-caliber volleys - it was closest to the periscope and turned away from the system and with its whole carcass split the submarine’s fragile hull ....
      such an irony of fate ..
      But the ships, specially created for the ram, were not so successful in general ..
  6. +1
    4 September 2017 08: 35
    progenitor of a new submarine of battleships

    Rather, a new generation.
  7. +2
    4 September 2017 08: 44
    And if you count to the date of commissioning as a combat unit, then all 23. But even this deadline is an outstanding result.
    ... Apparently because of the timelines and ordered the construction of ships in Great Britain in other states ...
    1. +2
      4 September 2017 10: 09
      Quote: parusnik
      And if you count to the date of commissioning as a combat unit, then all 23. But even this deadline is an outstanding result.
      ... Apparently because of the timelines and ordered the construction of ships in Great Britain in other states ...

      the rush was due to the naval race between the WB and Germany (France and Italy)
      Germany has already worked on similar ships
      1. aiw
        +3
        4 September 2017 10: 52
        Germany didn’t work. The Britons were the first to be able to analyze the results of Tsushima, and realizing that a single GC allows an effective sighting over long ranges, creating a dreadnought. The main feature was actually a new tactics of naval battle, under which this ship was built.
        1. +6
          4 September 2017 14: 17
          Quote: aiw
          The Britons were the first to be able to analyze the results of Tsushima, and realizing that a single GC allows an effective sighting over long ranges, creating a dreadnought.

          Heh heh heh ... actually, the overseas separatists and tea lovers justified the need to switch to an all-big-gun ship even before the REV, at a conference in Newport in 1903. Two years were spent on choosing this same unified caliber, and also convincing the Design Bureau that the classic super-EBR with 4x12 "and 8x10" they offer would be inferior to a ship with a uniform main gun. Fortunately, the results of the firing of 1904 arrived, according to the results of which it was found that only 12 "BBSs can penetrate the armored belt and get to the VHF.
          At first they wanted a launcher with 10 or even 12 guns. But because of the fuss with calibers and layouts, the sailors lost time and did not have time to prepare a proposal to increase the displacement limit for Congress. As a result, it was necessary to fit the new LC into the existing 16000-ton limit. I had to cut the tower to 4 and worsen habitability and seaworthiness. The project was completed on May 26, 1905, so the future South Carolina and Michigan became the first designed LCs in the world. But the construction of the Yankees did not work out ...
      2. +2
        4 September 2017 11: 47
        I don’t talk much about anything ... About the fact that the United Kingdom, in addition to building its own fleet, carried out military orders of other states ...
        race between the WB and Germany (France and Italy)
        ... I didn’t even mean it ...
  8. +2
    4 September 2017 08: 52
    not for nothing Britain at that time was called "mistress of the seas"
  9. +10
    4 September 2017 09: 09
    one more joke of William Horatio de Vir Cole is known - the sale of theater tickets. By distributing strictly defined places to bald men, he ensured that, having scattered in accordance with the indicated places, they formed the indecent word fuck, clearly visible from the balcony to King Edward VII
  10. +4
    4 September 2017 10: 12
    On the photo of the "Abyssinian royal family"
    Cole himself served as a "translator" under the "delegation" because they were speaking in a completely incomprehensible dialect, which is an outlandish mixture of Swahili and other African languages ​​known to students. By the way, for Virginia, at first there was no role, and it was risky to dress the girl in a bearded Abyssinian. But no one else was at hand. The remaining Abyssinians were athlete Anthony Buxton, artist Duncan Grant and the son of London judge Guy Ridley.
    Cole - on the right, with a mustache.
    1. +2
      4 September 2017 11: 19
      Thank! So deep I did not climb ...
      Duncan Grant is more known to me from all the participants. He was a very decent impressionist.
      1. +2
        4 September 2017 16: 01
        Sam Cole was born into the family of a rich man, successfully spent the money and died poor in Paris (English humor did not take root in France)
        His daughter is also known.
        Those years, all whom you don’t take, all who was famous.
        As for the Dreadnought - the industrial power of the WB was at its best. Another thing to add about turbines ...
        1. 0
          4 September 2017 17: 10
          I did not hear anything about my daughter, but Cole's sister was married to Neville Chamberlain, the Prime Minister of Great Britain.
          Unfortunately, the power plants of large ships are not my part and I cannot say anything intelligible about this. The only thing I remember is that Britain used very high-quality, low-sulfur, high-calorie Cardiff coal on its ships, and it burned leaving a minimum amount of slag.
          1. 0
            6 September 2017 22: 28
            Quote: A. Privalov
            The only thing I remember

            in the pro forma bareboat charter there is an article on coal reserves on board a vessel in terms of a long-flame cardiff. Giggling over the futile attempts of newly-minted shipowners from merchants to fight against crew enrichment through alternative fuel use, I always recalled this article. "Grandfathers" have been stuffing their hands since the 19th century, recounting coal reserves, and these "owners" are trying to save money by not giving "excess" tanning salons to their ships with broken ballast systems and lost anchors. Thoughts about the sudden need for bunkering in the middle of the sea and its price do not arise.
  11. aiw
    +2
    4 September 2017 10: 56
    Thank you very much, luxurious article! good
  12. +1
    4 September 2017 12: 34
    Good article, thanks!
  13. +1
    4 September 2017 13: 54
    And before the "grandfather" you just need to take off your hat ...
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +1
    5 September 2017 09: 49
    Quote: Alexey RA
    The project was completed on May 26, 1905, so the future South Carolina and Michigan became the first designed LCs in the world. But the construction of the Yankees did not work out ...

    As it was written in the same MK for 1973, that if the Yankees were ahead of the limes, then this class of LC would be called "Michigan smile
  16. 0
    6 September 2017 20: 14
    They say that when a real Emperor of Ethiopia visited Britain a couple of years later, he was refused an excursion to the Dreadnought,


    Which surely had its political consequences ... belay
    1. 0
      6 September 2017 22: 31
      Quote: Olezhek
      Which surely had its political consequences ...

      Yeah, the Italians were poisoned by the unfortunate Ethiopia.
      1. 0
        7 September 2017 12: 57
        Well, it only happens in 25 years ... lol
        1. 0
          7 September 2017 21: 03
          Quote: A. Privalov
          Well, it only happens in 25 years ... lol

          Just grow a generation of Italians, confident in the need to die in the Ethiopian desert. So, in Khokhland, just 25 years were grown confident ...
          1. 0
            7 September 2017 21: 19
            Quote: 97110
            So on Hochland, 25 has been growing confident years for years ...

            Sorry, but I do not see any similarities.
  17. 0
    8 September 2017 22: 40
    Well, a cool article .. but the construction timeline is really impressive ... a completely new ship and new modern technology and only 1 year ... oh, apparently this is now far from such a pace! especially to our shipbuilders ...
  18. +1
    16 December 2017 10: 16
    Test to check the visibility of images:


  19. 0
    16 December 2017 10: 41
    Here is what my previous post actually looks like:

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"