Well, let him fly, piece of iron ...

77
I love a sinful thing in good weather to get out of town. Fortunately, we have this very "out of town" almost everywhere. And all sorts of natural areas there ... If you go north you will enter the taiga. To the east - in the marsh-lake region with a lot of all sorts of adventures in the style of "Paris - Dakar". To the west ... It’s generally better not to go there. Almost the same as in the east, only without the "lake" ... But in the south there is a forest-steppe. Beauty. Small pegs, it is so fragments of the taiga that they moved to the south, they are called. And the steppe, with small lakes. And the fish are there ... And places, respectively ...





Yes, and we have the weather corresponding to these very natural areas. I heard here that someone out of the Moscow authorities decided to “sue” the weather forecasters. It seems the wrong weather forecast was given. Funny people are Muscovites. We have a wrong forecast every day. So what? Judge? True, our weather forecasters are more cunning than Moscow ones. They moved from the millionth city to the next. Millionth too. And from there they predict ... They understand that here it is possible to "shlop up" in a neighborly way by ... And so, an ordinary phone call. Hello, are you all that fools? And who is this talking? I say this ...

I do not write this for advertising tourism in our region. Just to create the appropriate setting. Well, like in the movies. When something has to happen, the music is always alarming ... Artwork after all.

And so, I go, means, in a direction "approximately there" on "the trimmed road". Our roads are clearly divided into tracks. This is when there is asphalt and it is even sometimes patched with “patching”. There are paths. This is when there is some sort of asphalt, but they are repairing the road in the old way. Fall asleep in the pits all construction debris. And the cars are rolling. Not in the sense of road cars. Not. "Honda" all sorts, "Toyota". In extreme cases, the "Patriots". On the path, even the curb can be found ... in the middle of the road. There are local roads. This is when the field road is sometimes trimmed with a bulldozer. And that is inconvenient when the head of a rural settlement "hangs on its belly" in its "Niva" on a mound. Everything else is "well-built roads".

I'm driving, which means I notice right along the groundhog road. Muzzle, blurred by fat. The color is so ... sable. And most importantly, it does not sit, but lies. And looking at me. Eyes are narrow ... Well, I think, I, you insolent, now ... I'm slowing down. And he did not even budge. Like, I wanted to spit on your threats. So we sit-lie against each other. I am the crown of nature. And he - "spat here."

I had to open the door and stick my foot out of the car. "Crown" I or not "crown" ... And only here this fat "miracle" moved. It turns out that he rested near his hole. Well, "dived" there. Left me with a nose.

And I remembered ... about the recent incident with another narrow-eyed people. And narrow eyes are just a distinctive feature of a nation. Nature has done so in the course of evolution. Like the color groundhog. Working people. Interesting, right to say, people. The car that "kneads" "well-built road", they also produced. Japanese! Good car. Reliable and comfortable.

And about the incident you, dear readers, have repeatedly heard. Well, when another, also not a big-eyed people, launched a rocket through Japan into the ocean. Than the Neptune did not please Koreans, I do not know. However, their leader decided to "babahnut" the kingdom of this very Neptune rocket. Not a simple rocket, but a ballistic one!

I even remember the message that was passed news:

“North Korea, by order of Kim Jong-un, launched a ballistic missile toward Japan. According to news agencies in South Korea, Japan and the world, the North Korean missile passed over North Japan. According to military experts, it could hit any of the Japanese cities and carry nuclear warhead. "

No, in North Korea, the rocket industry, according to the American press, is about the same as our "tracts." It looks like a “road”, but only local aborigines can “ride” it. Missiles like there, only here is the "wrong system." Well, Americans say every day. Nobody even calls them rockets. I specifically watched Japanese TV channels. Good computer allows you to translate texts. Although, maybe he translated incorrectly. My knowledge of Japanese is not among my strengths ...

NHK TV channel:

"North Korea made another launch of the rocket in the direction of the Japanese region of Tohoku. Yonhap Agency referring to the statement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said:" The launch of a projectile of unknown type was made from the Sunan (Pyongyang) region in the direction of the Eastern Sea at 5: 57 in the morning local time ".

The Japanese are the only people in the world who have already experienced the horrors of the use of the atomic bomb. Like nobody on Earth, they know what it is. And I was always sure that in matters of protection against this weapons they went much further than our road builders. Well, not the tracks they have, so at least the paths ... And what happened?

Another "western duty". Fake protection from a real threat. It turned out that the woodchuck who wanted to spit on the "crown of nature" is really better protected. It is clear that if I tried to catch him, I would get acquainted with powerful enough teeth and paws. Yes, and I would not risk catching him with my bare hands. So, play and see the reaction of the animal. And the Japanese?

In their place, to be extremely honest, now we need to drive a filthy broom on our government, the prime minister, and the American defenders. Together with all the missile and air defense systems. Together with airplanes, ships ...

Why did the vaunted American and South Korean missile defense systems turn out to be nothing? Or do they have exactly the same "natural areas" as mine? Or maybe the North Korean rocket is so modern that the vaunted American missile defense systems cannot “remove” it?

Do you know how the Japanese government reacted to launching an "unknown type of projectile"? Do not believe it, but ... The authorities reported that the situation is "being analyzed by the US and South Korean authorities, and the Prime Minister of Japan Shinzo Abe reacted to it, who promised" to take everything necessary to protect the Japanese. "

And the Japanese were advised to "hide in strong houses and basements."

“After fixing the launch, local residents received an emergency warning about how to act in the event of a missile threat - they were informed that a rocket was launched in their country and they were offered to hide in“ strong houses ”and“ basements ”.

Unlike my “familiar” marmot, a real panic began in the region. Not only in Japan, but also among other "well-protected" Americans "Asian democrats" - in South Korea. As is often the case, Seoul and Washington "forgot" to warn Kim Jong-un. Joint exercises began. And rocket launch is nothing more than an answer to these teachings.

"The DPRK missile that flew over Japan’s airspace overcame 2700 km, the maximum flight height was about 550 km," said South Korean military. Yosihide Suga, the secretary general of the Japanese government, called the launch “an unprecedented and serious threat.” In addition, the administration of South Korean President Moon Zhe Ina immediately convened a meeting of the National Security Council. "

I, after meeting with the woodchuck, wondered why he did not attack me. Wild animal. Though a rodent, it usually protects its home "in an adult way". Why did he do exactly the same as the Japanese government did? Prime Minister Shinzo Abe stated:

"Japan did not attempt to bring down the North Korean ballistic missile launched on Tuesday in accordance with the law on the right to collective self-defense."

Well, everything is clear with the woodchuck. There is no danger, then there is no need to climb on the rampage. How about Japan? There is a danger, but there is no need to climb too? Then why do you need this law? And all these self-defense forces? Why do you need allies? I noticed one line in the Japanese media report:

"The North Korean rocket fell into the Pacific Ocean in 1180 kilometers east of the Japanese village of Erimo on the island of Hokkaido. Before the fall, it collapsed into three parts," said NHK television channel.

Funny Korean "welders" badly boil the rocket body. Flew to the goal and "collapsed." Well at least in three parts. Russian rockets "fall apart" into more parts before the "fall" ... Or maybe ... she "flew with friends"? "For three" in Korean? I did not find confirmation that the rocket was really "alone." As, however, and the fact that they "flew in a crowd." Just as the version sounded ...

Good to go on the field. Auto "snags" on potholes, Around autumn grasses. Horses graze. A local Amazon raced past a huge horse. The sun is frying. And on the horizon the lake gleams. The fish is waiting for the bait ... And thoughts are returning to very recent events. To Syria. More precisely, the media.

Remember, probably, how our "friends" (internal and external) reacted violently to the fact that Russian C-400 was not shot down by American missiles? How much noise was there. How much bile. But how do the same people react today. Significantly enough:

“If it was possible to otmazatsya with Tomahawks, they did not carry threats to bases in Syria,” the Russian troops watched the performance characteristics under combat conditions, the United States was a superpower, a war could begin, there was a threat (the warhead came to Japanese waters Japanese islands, and could fall on the territory), there was no superpower and the performance characteristics of the next "Mukokhvanson" are understandable, they "can fly - shoot down".

“Of course, we will have another round of fucking rhetoric - with aircraft carrier movements, B-1 and B-52 spans, shouts“ Mom swear, yes, rrrrastopchu - and I’m dad, ahi that I will burn! ”And even with articles in The Guardian Washington Telegraph - if Trump didn’t “bang”, not so much for Kim, but also for the rocket, he wouldn’t bang at the Russians if he captured the Baltic states. ”

These are the thoughts that caused my usual vacation trip in the last days of August. Fish, with the exception of a few crucians, I did not catch. Nature enjoyed to dizziness. Groundhog recorded a friend. And the roads we have not specifically repair. If you bring them into a divine form, then fools start chasing them ... Maybe in Japan, too?
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    31 August 2017 06: 44
    The groundhog is a noble beast, but he doesn’t have air defense, missile defense and SOI, so he dived into the hole at the first rattle!
    1. +19
      31 August 2017 10: 33
      Yes, such marmots are Japanese wink hoped for a striped missile defense laughing
      1. +22
        31 August 2017 12: 24
        vovanpain Today, 10: 33 ↑
        Yes, here are the Japanese wink marmots hoping for a striped missile defense
        Volodya hi love , good afternoon! And to whom and when did the Yankees help ?! Militarily, this country can be compared with either a jackal or a vulture. They always came to the battlefield to profit from carrion when the battle was already over! They can fight only with a obviously weak enemy, and if their advantage is multiple, otherwise they are not eagles, but wet hens. Now Eun wiped his nose, and they pretended that nothing terrible had happened. Well, do not expect from them, in fact, the recognition that they were liquidly managed ?!
        1. +7
          31 August 2017 12: 58
          Dianochka love hi , and the joke is that it turns out - the mattresses and their bases do not want to protect, because when it flies it is not always clear where it will sit. although somewhere you can understand Una - you want to bang, but where you don’t spit, you’ll go to Japan
          1. +15
            31 August 2017 13: 58
            Roma hi love , I strongly suspect that Eun doesn’t so much want to fumble as to show mattresses that it’s more expensive to touch him. Well, I do not believe that Eun is a suicide and intentionally does everything to strangle him with sanctions. In addition, he could send a missile much farther south, but he just needed to check the reaction to the launch, but it actually was not! The Americans mumbled something about the fact that the rocket de mole did not threaten anyone, and therefore there was no need to bring down it. In Japan, there is a quiet panic, children are hiding under the desks, Seoul in horror urgently gathers a safety council.
            I suspect that now the fifth point of Amerzos’s generals is very itchy, from the kicks received from the US Presidential Administration, because they all convinced that they would knock down any North Korean missile, and what’s the outcome ?! And at the exit, they did not even detect either the start time, or where they would fly, they didn’t identify, let alone bring down something there! I have been saying for a long time that their entire so-called missile defense system is nothing but offensive weapons for the so-called "disarming" strike against us, and possibly against China ...
            1. +1
              31 August 2017 15: 53
              and they have been under sanctions since 1949;
            2. +1
              31 August 2017 17: 39
              I will ask you this question too. On what basis were the US supposed to bring down their rocket which flew out of the atmosphere of the earth and fell in neutral waters?
              1. -1
                4 September 2017 13: 26
                Yes, at least just to save face, in confirmation of the words that they are ready to bring down any North Korean missile.
                I emphasize any.
                Well, at an altitude of 500 km, or how much it might not have been there, but could you demonstrate the operation of a missile defense at the final stage of the flight?
                And now it seems that either they did not see or simply did not manage to react. In general, you must agree that the impact on the image is significant - not to bring down one single missile, all the more so as claimed by the assembly using primitive technologies.
            3. +2
              31 August 2017 17: 45
              Well, I do not believe that Eun is a suicide and intentionally does everything to strangle him with sanctions.

              Diana .. love ..! For any sane and adequate person, this is clear as God's day ..! Only those who are deeply hooked on all this Western "democratic" propaganda can argue about Un's insanity and inadequacy ...
              I suspect that now the fifth point of Amerzos’s generals is very itchy, from the kicks received from the US Presidential Administration, because they all convinced that they would knock down any North Korean missile, and what’s the outcome ?!

              The fifth point they may itch, but they understand very well that especially now they can’t do anything with Un by military means. In fact, Eun convinced the American generals that it would be more expensive to touch him ..
        2. +2
          31 August 2017 17: 37
          And what have they done? What do you propose to bring down a rocket in space, outside the earth's atmosphere? Did this rocket threaten anyone or fly in Japanese airspace? Is not an act of aggression against a sovereign state the downing of its cosmic objects? If not then all the satellites are scrapped.
          1. -1
            4 September 2017 15: 21
            This "space object of a sovereign state" and remained in space?
            No, he perfectly "splashed" in the ocean.
            Moreover, as if nobody was going to shoot down space, it was as if they were not going to, but on the contrary, in the initial or final section of the trajectory.
            Everyone knew that this was a ballistic missile, perhaps not even a training one (who knows what Koreans have in mind?)
            It was necessary to shoot down anywhere in the way in which it was possible.
  2. +12
    31 August 2017 07: 08
    The author correctly and with good irony described the situation and the hype surrounding the launch of a rocket. In short, “A lot of noise from nothing.” Did the Americans, South Koreans and Japanese think that the DPRK would stop its launches once and for all? I think no. The fact that flying over the Japanese islands and at an altitude of 550 km while frightening the Japanese very much (from the supply of their emergency services) is not the problem of the Koreans.
    1. +7
      31 August 2017 07: 26
      Quote: rotmistr60
      so this is not a problem for Koreans.

      If not a problem, but the American "missile defense" which does not shoot down DPRK missiles?
      1. +3
        31 August 2017 07: 32
        ... while greatly frightening the Japanese (from the filing of their emergency services), so this is not a problem for Koreans

        Here about North Koreans. And on the contrary, they are glad that the vaunted missile defense did not bring down, and perhaps didn’t even react. True, the Americans later turned away, saying that they had calculated the trajectory and realized that the missile was not a threat to Japan.
        1. +7
          31 August 2017 09: 08
          Quote: rotmistr60
          True, the Americans later turned away, saying that they had calculated the trajectory and realized that the missile was not a threat to Japan.

          Amers simply have nothing to shoot down targets at such an altitude (550 km.) And they are making excuses.
          1. +1
            31 August 2017 14: 07
            And what about the airspace of Japan extends to a height of 550 km?
            1. +2
              31 August 2017 14: 55
              Quote: Ararat
              And what about the airspace of Japan extends to a height of 550 km?

              Cosmos is still free for all who reach there. It is not clear why such a boil in Japan? laughing
              1. +2
                31 August 2017 15: 48
                The result of the flight of pieces of iron did not take long: Today, Japan decided to create a full-fledged army. American concerns are counting the profits from the supply of their weapons to them.
                So who does the DPRK work for? laughing
          2. +1
            31 August 2017 19: 27
            Dear, what will you shoot down at such a height? from a slingshot? This is, for a moment, outer space.
        2. +8
          31 August 2017 09: 59
          Quote: rotmistr60
          and maybe didn’t even react. True, the Americans later otmazyvatsya, saying that they calculated the trajectory and realized that Japan’s missile does not carry a threat.

          ... and to Guam ?! ;))))))))))))))))))))))))
          It turns out that they “calculated” the trajectory AFTER the impact, when the RSD “honestly worked out” and the warhead landed / descended to the designated area (aiming point) :)))))))))))))))))))))))
          Already wrote -
          The capabilities of the current 3,14 missile defense were clearly demonstrated yesterday's launch of the Hwason-12 RSD ...
          Here, or as the VVZh says, “there was no task to intercept.” Or - "I couldn’t ..." Yankees can intercept RSD only if they “call” them and take into account the exact start location and time.
          Comments are unnecessary. And this opens up excellent opportunities for Russian and Chinese ICBMs, especially from underwater carriers, for "preventive strikes at the appointed time." EVERYTHING IS A DOT!
    2. +8
      31 August 2017 09: 55
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The fact that flying over the Japanese islands and at an altitude of 550 km while frightening the Japanese very much (from the supply of their emergency services) is not the problem of the Koreans.

      Quote: sir.jonn
      ain't a problem, but an American "missile defense" that doesn’t shoot down DPRK missiles?

      The rocket did not violate the airspace of Japan, since everything above 100 km is considered space! bully
      And it is very doubtful that the United States has such missile defense systems that could get a missile at such a height. Perhaps - at the start, on the active site, after entering the atmosphere - but not at an altitude of over 500 km ...
      And Japan and South Korea certainly do not have such missile defense systems.
      If we recall the events of more than 20 years ago, when the DPRK did not have a nuclear long loaf or medium-range missiles, it is worth noting that during the war with the DPRK, the United States believed that more than 1 million people would be victims of ordinary means alone, including US citizens - up to 100 thousand. Then, under Clinton, it was considered unacceptable damage and considered it possible to negotiate with Kim Jong Il. He refused the nuclear missile program, had to dismantle his nuclear reactor, which could produce weapons-grade plutonium, and the United States lifted all sanctions and pledged to build two nuclear reactors in exchange on which weapons-grade nuclear materials could not be produced. But the United States under Bush refused these agreements and the DPRK returned to developing a nuclear missile shield. The reason is simple - in the 90s, the DPRK was extremely tight: Russia, like the USSR before, did not provide assistance on a large scale, and the PRC also did not provide it, since Kim showed excessive independence, according to the Chinese. The result - in the DPRK was not just malnutrition, but real hunger. And the United States, making a deal with Kim, simply hoped that the main thing was to remove tensions now, but it was not necessary to fulfill the agreement - Kim, in their opinion, would still not be in power, and in 5-7 years the regime would collapse. Bush realized that the regime was not going to collapse and refused to fulfill the agreement. As a result, in addition to conventional weapons that could cause unacceptable damage to American troops in Korea and South Koreans (the capital of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Seoul is within the reach of the DPRK artillery), the DPRK acquired, even if inferior, a nuclear missile shield. And now you shouldn’t even touch the North Koreans! hi
      1. +3
        31 August 2017 13: 01
        and indeed you don’t need to touch anyone - you would live your own mind and not impose your values
  3. +3
    31 August 2017 07: 57
    Yes, not the samurai now ...
    1. -1
      31 August 2017 09: 06
      Those or not those - I want to live. Especially this.
      1. +3
        31 August 2017 10: 10
        Quote: Zibelew
        Yes, not the samurai now ...

        Quote: Banshee
        Those or not those - I want to live. Especially this.

        Do you think the DPRK REALLY threatens them? what
        With a dozen medium-range missiles, and having blown up several nuclear devices, it is hardly possible to seriously threaten Japan. From a nuclear device to a bomb - a journey in a year or two, but to a missile warhead, all the more so small - you can’t do it for ten years.
        All these screams about the DPRK's nuclear missile program are the installation of red lines that cannot be crossed. The United States marked its red lines, Kim its own. And the Kimov red lines did not coincide with the Trump ones ... But the USA is not ready to fight in response to violations of warnings. So it seems that the United States threw the Japanese and South Koreans. But this is only an impression - with a real attack, the DPRK will receive an answer. It’s just that no one is interested in this attack - neither the United States (the notorious “unacceptable damage”), nor the DPRK (Kim is not a suicide, and understands that it’s one thing to trade a threat, the other thing is a threat to implement: DPRK with the majority of the population will simply destroyed), nor, especially, Japan and South Korea. hi
        1. +2
          31 August 2017 10: 27
          But is there a real threat of an attack by the DPRK on Japan or South Korea?
          1. +3
            31 August 2017 11: 00
            It’s hard to live with a neighbor who is not in himself, walks with an ax and screams loudly that he’s chopping everyone up. The neighbor is no longer annoyed not so much by the conflict itself as by a constant nervousness: it will begin, it will not begin.
            1. +17
              31 August 2017 14: 06
              Sivasa Today, 11:00 ↑
              It’s hard to live with a neighbor who is not in himself, walks with an ax and screams loudly that he’s chopping everyone up. The neighbor is no longer annoyed not so much by the conflict itself as by a constant nervousness: it will begin, it will not begin.
              Yes?! Are you sure this is so ?! Maybe everything is exactly the opposite ?! This is Una provoking Seoul with Washington, and not he them! It’s inadequate at its borders with a nuclear club and a bunch of six hangers-on, led by Japan and South Korea. And not just walking, but threatening to get into the garden and trample the beds! What remains of Eunu ?! That's right, take a heavier club and go to disperse all this brazen shobla!
              1. 0
                31 August 2017 17: 43
                Well, as if guilt sits on the shoulders of His great-grandfather. There was nothing to climb to the south.
                1. +2
                  31 August 2017 18: 28
                  Quote: Ararat
                  There was nothing to climb on the south.

                  Well then, in the same way, you can ask about the kulphodok to the north ... The only question is, why do American ships with nuclear weapons float along the coast of the DPRK? What is this country for the Americans? attacked the USA?
                2. +1
                  31 August 2017 23: 25
                  Are you aware of the events that preceded the outbreak of the Korean War?
                3. 0
                  3 September 2017 19: 27
                  Quote: Ararat
                  Well, as if guilt sits on the shoulders of His great-grandfather. There was nothing to climb to the south.

                  Well then, according to your words, the Americans have blame above the roof: they had nothing to climb into Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Yugoslavia, Panama, etc., etc.
              2. 0
                31 August 2017 17: 44
                Are you serious? South Korea, Japan, the United States will start a conflict in which they will inevitably clash with China? Will South Korea jeopardize Seoul’s agglomeration?
              3. 0
                31 August 2017 19: 34
                By and large, that those that these amnyuki are still.
            2. +6
              31 August 2017 19: 36
              No, but the Americans don’t shout that they’re chopping it, but without noise and dust they chop everyone right and left. And the Japanese got to the fullest. So what? Isn't it hard to live with such a neighbor? He’s like a normal guy, right?
              What doesn’t agree on you, who are you there, you won’t understand by nickname, man or woman?
              In your opinion, if the Americans destroyed a dozen countries in the last ten or two years, killing several million people, they replaced the governments of a dozen countries. At present, a dozen more countries are occupying. Around the world have more than 900 military bases.
              And now they are white and fluffy. But the Koreans do not kill anyone, do not bomb, do not occupy, but very very bad guys.
              Do you have everything in Sivasa’s head after such statements?
              1. 0
                1 September 2017 13: 02
                You need to go to the hospital.
          2. +2
            31 August 2017 16: 42
            Quote: ArikKhab
            But is there a real threat of an attack by the DPRK on Japan or South Korea?

            No! Rather, it is worth worrying about such neighbors under the American security umbrella. hi
            But on the other hand, hysteria around the DPRK’s “problem” allows us to arm ourselves, maintain American military bases and constantly conduct military exercises that annoy Pyongyang.
        2. +11
          31 August 2017 14: 09
          Quote: andj61
          From a nuclear device to a bomb - a journey in a year or two, but to a missile warhead, all the more so small - you can’t do it for ten years.

          According to the most * modest * Amer’s estimates, the DPRK currently has 60 nuclear warheads. They do not hesitate to demonstrate their delivery vehicles to targets ... What else do you need?
          Quote: Sivasa
          It’s hard to live with a neighbor who is not in himself, walks with an ax and screams loudly that he’s chopping everyone up.
          I agree, this is when you yourself do not get together with heavily armed sidekicks at the neighbor’s doorstep and don’t rattle tsatskas, telling and demonstrating how you will climb into the neighbor’s house and kill everyone you meet on the way ... But joint maneuvers and the landing exercises of the USA and the ROK demonstrate exactly this ...
          So, it’s time to end dancing with the wolves and peacefully resolve the issue of unifying Korea into a single state. And preferably without the help of the "everywhere existing" Yankees.
          1. 0
            31 August 2017 16: 48
            Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
            According to the most * modest * Amer’s estimates, the DPRK currently has 60 nuclear warheads. They do not hesitate to demonstrate their delivery vehicles to targets ... What else do you need?

            For such a quantity of DPRK, even purely technically plutonium could not work out. The biggest is two dozen. In addition, they demonstrate missiles in which the warhead will be of the order of half a ton. To make a nuclear warhead of such a small weight and the United States, And the USSR took more than two decades after the first test. DPRK has immeasurably less opportunities. A bomb of several tons, most likely more than 5, is a more real thing
          2. 0
            1 September 2017 10: 45
            "Everywhere Yankee Yankees"! laughing good From the heart! And most importantly to the point!
        3. +5
          31 August 2017 14: 23
          Japan has a high population density. On 4 islands live 125 million people. Approximately as we have in the entire European part of the Russian Federation. And here the main part of the population is on 3 islands. Hokkaido is less populated. Any nuclear explosion over these islands will lead to a huge number of victims. negative
          The fact that the DPRK has no warheads is doubtful. They didn’t have medium-range missiles, but they appeared. And in 2 years there will be a full-fledged mbr. Technology is clearly being leaked to them, they have for sure warheads. In addition, infa slipped that a group of former Ukrainian engineers plowed them. It is clear that they cannot reproduce the same Voivode, since far from all of its technologies were in Ukraine. But seriously promoting the Korean nuclear program and riveting a simpler pepelats is enough. hi Yes, and China stopudovo helps his younger brother with the development.
          1. +1
            31 August 2017 17: 00
            Quote: g1v2
            The fact that the DPRK has no warheads is doubtful. They didn’t have medium-range missiles, but they appeared. And in 2 years there will be a full-fledged mbr. Technology is clearly being leaked to them, they have for sure warheads. In addition, infa slipped that a group of former Ukrainian engineers plowed them. It is clear that they cannot reproduce the same Voivode, since far from all of its technologies were in Ukraine. But seriously promoting the Korean nuclear program and riveting a simpler pepelats is enough. Yes, and China stopudovo helps his younger brother with the development.

            The Soviet Union supplied operational tactical missiles to them, and, apparently, they also shared technologies. And the DPRK actively traded these missiles - from Saudi Arabia to Iran. But the medium-range missiles currently being demonstrated are not very different in size from the old Soviet operational-tactical missiles, but they fly clearly further. Here, the DPRK has a breakthrough in engines and fuel - this is obvious. For some time now, China has not been feeding North Korea with such technologies - Kim is behaving too independently, however, like his father. Russia believes even less in technology transfer. But there could have been leaks from Ukraine. And the RD-120 engine is very suitable for the missiles shown by the Koreans. That's just a multi-ton warhead, he is unlikely to pull .. hi
            1. +2
              31 August 2017 20: 49
              China also does not mind having such a proxy to pressure opponents. Everyone loves to fight with the wrong hands. Incidentally, he could clearly merge some of the DPRK technologies.
  4. +3
    31 August 2017 08: 01
    Have you seen the height? Higher than ISS flight altitude. and over Japan and over our country and over amers thousands of different objects and military ones fly at different heights, of course, too. but they don’t particularly get knocked down but study. The problem is that this missile can at any moment be screwed into our territory, in the event of a control failure, for example, to Vladivostok, how would you react to such a present? Of course, you are a noble beast, only the roof goes with him. In the event of an attack on my territory, I would erase my opponents from the face of the earth without a twinge of conscience.
  5. +9
    31 August 2017 08: 15
    Cool article, along with Turgenev, Pushkin and Paustovsky. Truth. I thought, and decided to write about my city ... The city of us is capital. We have the same name for beer, sea and mountains. In the summer we have Egypt, in the winter of Courchevel, in the spring of London, in the fall of Peter - it remains only to equip ... But it’s better not to, otherwise everyone will come here ... And so they send different bosses ... Tatars - The Mongols took three days to plunder the city . The same ... For years ... The roads we have ... Classic ... The most classic in Russia ... Well, something I'm all about sad. Recently drove a man. In a residential area adjacent to factories. They talked. A man said the area is dirty, dark, groomed, people are thumping, gopot is full, people have low earnings, but in the center of the city there people are more cultured and behave more decent and polite ... Well, what could I say. .. He said that people from this area ... Gagarin launched into space ...
  6. BAI
    +4
    31 August 2017 09: 36
    A rocket flew over the Japanese islands, and Russian Sakhalin disappeared from the maps.
  7. +6
    31 August 2017 09: 46
    Boris55 is right: a ballistic missile can be shot down on takeoff or when lowered on a target. On the marching section you can’t get it, there’s nothing to get it. Therefore, our Iskander actively maneuvers in the initial and final part of the flight -
    there is no need to do this on the march. Therefore, the Japanese sat and did not twitch, watching the trajectory. Everything is logical.
    After such reflection, the motive for the article is not clear, although it is written beautifully. And I wanted to sit on that lake, dawn ... fellow
    1. +4
      31 August 2017 10: 53
      Well, put it was possible to put it, standard 3 from the frigates for guarding the AUG of the Yankees, which is hanging out there next to South Korea. And just at the initial stage of the break up. We didn’t want or couldn’t, that's the main intrigue. I think that they couldn’t.
      1. 0
        31 August 2017 14: 15
        To shoot down a rocket at the initial stage of a flight means to shoot it down over the territory of the DPRK. Do you think this is an act of aggression or not?
    2. +2
      31 August 2017 14: 17
      Quote: Galleon
      On the marching section you can’t get it, there’s nothing to get it.

      Soon they will get it. There is infa that the Yankees are going to deploy the space echelon of missile defense ... Then everything will start for sure. And there will be no time for laughter and hooting.
      1. +2
        31 August 2017 17: 10
        Quote: BoA KAA
        Quote: Galleon
        On the marching section you can’t get it, there’s nothing to get it.

        Soon they will get it. There is infa that the Yankees are going to deploy the space echelon of missile defense ... Then everything will start for sure. And there will be no time for laughter and hooting.

        And what does "space echelon missile defense" mean? Placing missile defense on satellites? So far, this contradicts the agreements concluded in the shaggy years. The launch of weapons into space AFTER an attack is unrealistic, which is confirmed by a bunch of studies invested in the SDI at one time - the answer is much cheaper. Raising the ceiling of anti-missile missiles to a couple of thousand kilometers - so as long as they reach, the target missile leaves it a long time ago - the anti-missile must be several times faster than the missile, and this is also doubtful: the slightest maneuver of the missile will disrupt the capture.
        Really at high altitude - at least 50-100 km in a passive section try to bring down a warhead, although this task is not trivial. It’s even more realistic to shoot down a rocket in an active area, immediately after launch. To do this, you need the launch positions of the missiles to be at least 300-400 km from the missile defense. In the case of the deployment of American missile defense in South Korea, this is quite realistic. hi
        1. +2
          31 August 2017 18: 46
          Quote: andj61
          what does the space echelon missile defense mean
          So far, only SPRN system satellites:
          The task of the satellites is the ability to effectively detect, track targets throughout the flight path, discriminate against missile defense systems, as well as their efficiency in interaction with other elements of the layered missile defense system. It is emphasized that it is no longer national, but specifically global. STSS satellites are designed to close the decision-making chain to defeat targets by all means of the layered global missile defense system.

          But when high-power lasers are created, the interception (SOI) option is also possible.
          1. 0
            1 September 2017 09: 43
            Quote: BoA KAA
            Quote: andj61
            what does the space echelon missile defense mean
            So far, only SPRN system satellites:
            The task of the satellites is the ability to effectively detect, track targets throughout the flight path, discriminate against missile defense systems, as well as their efficiency in interaction with other elements of the layered missile defense system. It is emphasized that it is no longer national, but specifically global. STSS satellites are designed to close the decision-making chain to defeat targets by all means of the layered global missile defense system.

            But when high-power lasers are created, the interception (SOI) option is also possible.

            Back in the 80s, nuclear-pumped X-ray lasers were developed as part of the SDI.
            Here the question is in application tactics. The initiating part of the laser, from where the energy comes from, is the nuclear warhead. After its initiation, the energy of a nuclear explosion feeds an X-ray laser, which destroys a rocket or warhead outside the atmosphere. That's just the placement of nuclear weapons in outer space is prohibited by current agreements - no one will like that something could instantly fall from orbit, for example, into the capital, even if as a result of a technical malfunction. And therefore, missiles with such lasers should have started AFTER the time of hour C. In real life, they simply do not have time to be placed in orbit to destroy the launched missiles. An ordinary laser in orbit simply cannot have a power source of sufficient power to destroy a warhead - here you cannot do with solar panels, batteries, capacitors and their combinations - the power is very decent. So the point here is not a laser at all, but a source of energy for it. There is, of course, the option of a nuclear reactor, but there are too many problems with both size and security - the Soviet apparatus, which fell in the late 70s in northern Canada, caused a lot of trouble at the time of the USSR. But that reactor did not have enough power to initiate a laser to destroy warheads - it must be increased by an order of magnitude. hi
  8. +1
    31 August 2017 10: 05
    here, just about 3 world did not start, but you are marmots, marmots ...
  9. 0
    31 August 2017 10: 15
    You can shoot down such a missile only at the initial stage, when it starts.
  10. +1
    31 August 2017 10: 21
    Japan made no attempt to bring down a North Korean ballistic missile launched on Tuesday in accordance with the law on the right to collective self-defense. "
    Well there is nothing to add except Comrade Eun not to joke
  11. 0
    31 August 2017 10: 24
    just the Japanese do not consider Hokkaido to be Japan proper ... So, part of the "northern territories" populated by the Ainu (local people) and shift workers ... Therefore, there weren’t any buzzes either — it’s not Honshu or Okinawa
  12. +5
    31 August 2017 10: 44
    The reliability of Amer’s air defense and missile defense raises a lot of doubts. It’s enough to recall that their latest super-duper systems, when tested, shot down a ballistic missile of the 60s from the third attempt and in greenhouse conditions. But how would you not get into a rocket? , the image of Amba. And they will drown the event in a verbal stream and then give it all away for their complete success. The whole question is what was the real task of this launch and how many of our stations watched the reaction of the NATO missile defense systems. The rocket fell apart so carefully.
    1. +3
      31 August 2017 14: 20
      Quote: shinobi
      It was painfully neat that the rocket fell apart.

      Or maybe they still observed the separation of BB simulators !?
  13. +2
    31 August 2017 10: 55
    And why is everyone worried about Japan and the combat readiness of the American missile defense?
  14. +9
    31 August 2017 12: 42
    1. About 500 km. Look at the map in the article, it differs from what was printed at the beginning. The trajectory lies to the north and it’s not about any 500 km that the section of the fall actually went over Hokkaido. Therefore, if according to the previous map, approximately 250-300 km, then this height is approximately 100-150 km
    2. About the calculated point of incidence. And they did not hear about the quasi-ballistic trajectory, but if it was a modification. A rocket would dive downhill and fall 1000 kilometers closer.
    3. About the rocket fell apart. Or maybe warheads are divided?
    4. About, but in combat conditions. And in combat, not one but dozens of missiles will fly, and what kind of them will be with horseradish ballast horseradish.

    In general, apparently about the millions of victims, if the war begins, you were right. Here, after all, only one (ONE !!!) flying rocket is enough and with the triggered nuclear warhead.
    1. +4
      31 August 2017 14: 28
      Quote: bk316
      Look at the map in the article, it differs from what was printed at the beginning. The trajectory lies to the north and we are not talking about any 500 km; actually, a section of the fall went over hokkaido.
      I looked. (By the way, take a closer look yourself!) There is no scale on the map (?), And the direction VECTOR is indicated and not the BR splash-off end point, because 2700 km lie far beyond this scheme (given to demonstrate the azimuth of launch of the BR).
      Therefore, your arguments are not accepted. The rest of the argument is normal. Put the "+".
      1. +4
        31 August 2017 18: 26
        Damn, and you definitely didn’t notice Thank you.
        That's because they write path, but you need course or to the extreme direction
        1. +2
          31 August 2017 18: 49
          Quote: bk316
          Damn, and you definitely didn’t notice, thanks.

          Forever please! drinks
  15. +5
    31 August 2017 12: 55
    We duplicate the delirium of the Western media!
    DPRK missile flying through Japanese airspace
    Airspace and airless (space) are not only different in meaning, but also in the legal field - everything above 100 km, space. Is a rocket flying over Japan at an altitude below 100 km?
    1. +3
      31 August 2017 18: 31
      in the legal field

      They gave me a note here, it turns out that there is no international law on the upper border of airspace, so everyone has their own garden ... Maybe the Yapis think that it extends to infinity ...
      1. 0
        1 September 2017 00: 08
        Only a space filled with air can be called - AIR (a mixture of gases (mainly nitrogen and oxygen - 98-99% in total, as well as argon, carbon dioxide, water, hydrogen), which forms the earth's atmosphere)!
        Oh, mother mimia, - in airless space (SPACE), there is not and cannot be, airspace. We can say that the atmosphere can also be detected at an altitude of 1000 km, except for space vehicles, not a single vehicle using the lifting force of air flies in space.
        1. 0
          1 September 2017 00: 21
          Yes, if we refer to the American X-15, which reached an altitude of 108 km, then this is not a plane, but a rocket plane!
  16. +3
    31 August 2017 14: 30
    The article did not like, very vague. It must be in the section of fiction.
  17. +3
    31 August 2017 19: 01
    Quote: Ararat
    I will ask you this question too. On what basis were the US supposed to bring down their rocket which flew out of the atmosphere of the earth and fell in neutral waters?

    Absolutely right. There is no reason because the rocket did not violate either the airspace or the territorial waters of Japan or some other country. The question is why in Japan the alarm sounded and warned people to hide? Warhead after separation did not see the radar? And the second question is why they boasted that they would intercept a rocket flying over Japan?
  18. +2
    31 August 2017 19: 06
    Quote: bk316
    in the legal field

    They gave me a note here, it turns out that there is no international law on the upper border of airspace, so everyone has their own garden ... Maybe the Yapis think that it extends to infinity ...

    Then all satellites over Japan must be shot down. They are below 400-500 km.
  19. +1
    31 August 2017 19: 16
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: bk316
    Look at the map in the article, it differs from what was printed at the beginning. The trajectory lies to the north and we are not talking about any 500 km; actually, a section of the fall went over hokkaido.
    I looked. (By the way, take a closer look yourself!) There is no scale on the map (?), And the direction VECTOR is indicated and not the BR splash-off end point, because 2700 km lie far beyond this scheme (given to demonstrate the azimuth of launch of the BR).
    Therefore, your arguments are not accepted. The rest of the argument is normal. Put the "+".

    The point of fall, if he believes the Japanese, is 1180 km from the Japanese coast. This is less than half 2700 km. All the same, the rocket was already going down over Japan. If the trajectory is quasibalistic over Japan, it has already flown much lower than 500 km. and if the radar lost warhead after separation, then they might have a bit of real fear that it would fall on Hokaido.
  20. 0
    31 August 2017 21: 03
    To the author Respect !!! ))) good Voiced what was spinning in my head! ))) hi
  21. +2
    31 August 2017 22: 46
    Quote: Sivasa
    It’s hard to live with a neighbor who is not in himself, walks with an ax and screams loudly that he’s chopping everyone up. The neighbor is no longer annoyed not so much by the conflict itself as by a constant nervousness: it will begin, it will not begin.

    Of course it’s hard, especially if you constantly spoil the neighbor’s gates and throw a Molotov cocktail through his fence in the New Year’s laughing
  22. +1
    1 September 2017 06: 24
    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    I suspect that now the fifth point of Amerzos’s generals is very itchy, from the kicks received from the US Presidential Administration, because they all convinced that they would knock down any North Korean missile, and what’s the outcome ?! And at the exit, they did not even detect either the start time, or where they would fly, they didn’t identify, let alone bring down something there!

    Suspicions must be supported by irrefutable evidence
    If you were present at the distribution of kicks to American generals, then this is proof!
    I would also like to see this action!

    Well this is a joke.
    But spotted or not, then who will tell you this?
    And Eun checks the reaction, and the Americans define the red line.
    True, the Japanese and South Koreans, in which case, will check everything on themselves.

    And whales with asterisks will draw conclusions based on the cones that their "experimental friends" will stuff.
    1. 0
      1 September 2017 11: 14
      That's it! I also think that the Americans just decided to see where the Korean missile could reach in principle! And already starting from this “shoto think”! Therefore, they did not shoot down. And to whom it will fall there if something happens ... for them the fifth case! Although thinking that "just could not" is also good! lol
    2. The comment was deleted.
  23. +1
    3 September 2017 11: 54
    Quote: rotmistr60
    The author correctly and with good irony described the situation and the hype surrounding the launch of a rocket. In short, “A lot of noise from nothing.” Did the Americans, South Koreans and Japanese think that the DPRK would stop its launches once and for all? I think no. The fact that flying over the Japanese islands and at an altitude of 550 km while frightening the Japanese very much (from the supply of their emergency services) is not the problem of the Koreans.

    Any state, after reaching a certain level of scientific and technical (educated or trained people, tools) and economic (money, raw materials) potential, can create nuclear weapons and their delivery vehicles. Only at this moment the will of the elite of the country is necessary. And one cannot restrain the natural course of development of civilization. Only if the rest of the country will periodically be bombed by "democracy" to the level of the Middle Ages. Or Germany, or, let’s say, Sweden, by the level of development, cannot create nuclear weapons? They can. Only, so far, they have not been recorded in the "Axis of Evil", they may not do this (participate with the "Big Guy" in the appointment of "bad guys").
  24. 0
    3 September 2017 19: 42
    Quote: Boris55
    The result of the flight of pieces of iron did not take long: Today, Japan decided to create a full-fledged army. American concerns are counting the profits from the supply of their weapons to them.
    So who does the DPRK work for? laughing

    Hint respected, how does the Japanese self-defense army differ from a "full-fledged army" ?! Pistols, airplanes and ships are fake? !!! Not fatal .....................

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"