On the "Army-2017" presented two versions of the mortar 2C41 "drok"

30
At the Army-2017 forum, the Main Missile-Artillery Directorate (GRAU) of the Ministry of Defense presented the 82-mm self-propelled mortar 2С41 "Drock" to the model. A slightly modified version of the self-propelled gun could also be seen on the stand of the UVZ corporation, reports Messenger of Mordovia.

On the "Army-2017" presented two versions of the mortar 2C41 "drok"


“If the UVZ model, painted in the“ branded Nizhny Tagil camouflage ”, was accompanied only by a brief designation of the type of machine, then representatives of the Main Agrarian University told in some detail about this interesting machine,” writes the author of the publication.



According to the information, OCD "Sketch" envisages the creation of samples of highly mobile artillery and mortar weapons on the automobile and two-link tracked chassis. "



It is reported that "82-mm self-propelled (portable) mortar 2C41" Drok "is intended for artillery (mortar) batteries of battalion artillery of motorized rifle, air assault and mountain battalions." With its help, targets in the area of ​​responsibility of the battalion will be amazed.

The minimum firing range is 100 m, the maximum is 6000 m, the firing rate is up to 12 rds / min, the ammunition load is 40 mines, the crew of a human 4, and the weight are 14 tons.



At the GRAU stand, the model of the machine has machine-gun armament placed on the turret, the UVZ exposition presents an option where the machine gun is mounted separately, in a special remote-controlled module.

  • http://vestnik-rm.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    28 August 2017 12: 54
    Let's hope that next year we will see “in kind”.
    High mobility and security for mortar calculation is a big plus.
    1. +2
      28 August 2017 12: 56
      In vain models put up.
      Do - show in kind. And the models are too Kiev
      sad
      1. +3
        28 August 2017 13: 10
        Dear, maybe we need to do aviation without a wooden model too? so that you don’t blow it in the pipe? and also not to throw on a sapromat 3 or more aircraft under a press? it always starts with a thumbnail and not with the finished product.
        1. +1
          28 August 2017 13: 38
          Do not confuse the model for testing, and the plastic layout on the display window.
    2. +2
      28 August 2017 13: 25
      Why don’t “chickens” on this “Typhoon” ... EC, when already in the series ???:


      1. +1
        28 August 2017 13: 32
        [b] [/ b] So everything is under the influence of the Syrian experience: there the carts rule ... And rightly so)
  2. +7
    28 August 2017 12: 55
    What can I say - a good mobile mortar!
    May God grant him to serve our Motherland!
  3. +3
    28 August 2017 12: 57
    All new crafts and variations on various topics are poured and poured. Meanwhile, they “pull the rubber” with already approved models of technology, endlessly washing out on trials and postponing the deadlines. (This is me about the Kurgan people, the Boomerangs and other Armats) Parades are looming prototypes that do not go into series and remain only on the pages of VO belay
    1. +1
      28 August 2017 13: 07
      ... of course I would like a faster "exhaust" of new products, but what we have is what we have ...
    2. +3
      28 August 2017 13: 08
      You shouldn’t be so. The fact that engineering is working should be encouraging. How old was our military-industrial complex in the pen ?!
      Quote: 3officer
      Parades of prototypes are emerging that do not go into series and remain only on the pages of VO

      In order for the new weapons to appear in the troops, it would be necessary to choose and test from what.
      1. 0
        28 August 2017 13: 14
        Yes, I'm not saying that new developments are not needed. stop It’s just reminiscent of a situation when a group of enthusiasts do not finish one thing or lose interest rush to another. At random, in a hurry, sorting through a bunch of options and expecting that some yes “shoot”
        1. +1
          28 August 2017 13: 22
          Quote: 3officer
          At random and in a hurry sorting through a bunch of options and expecting that some yes "shoot"

          Hardly "at random." I think that such developments are created for certain tasks. Recently, apparently, given the experience of Syria, there are many options for mobile firearms, which can be used both alone and in small units. Undoubtedly, such a technique would be useful in the Airborne Forces and other mobile units.
          A mortar on a protected wheelbase has many advantages. He will quietly advance to the OP, find the target, "hang" on the trajectory for 4-5 minutes, and just as quickly leave the OP, so the enemy will not really understand where these mines came from.
    3. +1
      28 August 2017 13: 55
      Calm down, not so fast ..... there is no magic wand for which time - and everything new in the troops is already ..... being delayed, which means there is a reason. Anyway, in the next 3-5 years the equipment will go to the troops, you will see, and we all will discuss and procrastinate on these issues at the VO.
  4. +5
    28 August 2017 13: 10
    as I see it, the army is increasingly relying on agne power plus mobility. a year or two ago, he himself did not underestimate the jihad mobil. after Syria, it became clear.
  5. +1
    28 August 2017 13: 17
    Doubtful design decision. Suppose the roof is strengthened, but the suspension remains standard. I doubt that she will be able to withstand the impact of the mortar for a long time. But if we do it in this way, then it would be nice to put a system of gerostabilization in 2 planes. Then you can conduct shelling on the go and more efficiently move away from counter-battery fire.
    1. +3
      28 August 2017 13: 29
      Quote: Vita VKO
      Doubtful design decision. Suppose the roof is strengthened, but the suspension remains standard. I doubt that she will be able to withstand the impact of the mortar for a long time. fire.

      This is the Kamaz base and the 82-mm mortar will survive without problems ...
      To understand the size, comparison with the "Tiger"
      1. +1
        28 August 2017 13: 32
        The dimensions are impressive considering the size of the Tiger:
        1. 0
          28 August 2017 15: 08
          Well, what you want is not a jeep but a truck
      2. 0
        28 August 2017 17: 37
        Quote: Samaritan
        This is the Kamaz base and the 82-millimeter mortar will survive without problems

        Let's say. But there is equipment in the car. Although modern radio stations, optronics and military computers are manufactured in shockproof design, it is still not recommended to "hit them with a hammer". Therefore, from the bottom of the machine it is necessary to provide a good hydraulic jack, which will extend under the mortar during firing.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +4
    28 August 2017 13: 42
    Not a heavy cart? 14 tons and 82 in armament ..
    Something thought: what if 82-ku mate? The mass will not increase much, but the effect should be. 24 mines per minute, 8-10 minutes in the air ...
    1. 0
      29 August 2017 06: 57
      So I think about 14 tons to move the mortar. By analogy, there is a mosquito fleet (RTOs). They placed containers with cruise missiles and they became a threat to the AUG. Minimum construction costs, and the effect is huge.
      In our version, the opposite is true.
  8. +3
    28 August 2017 13: 49
    Now this is a good option .. Now barmaley in the mountains can no longer hide ..
  9. +1
    28 August 2017 14: 22
    Very good for quick response and airborne groups.
    Well, in the convoy to the place will be.
  10. +1
    28 August 2017 14: 35
    A separate machine gun is very practical for this technique! Since during the execution of the task, the enemy will try in every possible way to make a “knight's move”, and here he shoots the bullet separately from the mortar.))) I am for the first option !!!
  11. +2
    28 August 2017 14: 41
    Self-propelled "Cornflower" appeared. A good topic, before Cornflowers in Zil or in the 66th put in the back - a very good composition was obtained, but here it should be great.
    1. +2
      28 August 2017 14: 59
      ... And self-propelled guns "Phlox"
    2. 0
      28 August 2017 16: 34
      The Hungarians put 2B9M (Cornflower) in series on MT-LB (Motolyga), and ours in Afghanistan - artificially.
  12. +1
    28 August 2017 15: 09
    This 82mm mortar will be and how to fire a direct-fire gun?
  13. 0
    28 August 2017 20: 19
    Extremely useful stuff! Therefore, as the main thing for mortar calculation - as soon as possible with ... go from a position until you cover it with "otvetku". So, a hybrid of an automatic 82 mm Cornflower and an armored jeep is just in time. A very effective means of fire support, which is "always at hand." Yes, and BC can carry more. It can be used in raid actions or in the classic version of "hit-back." Imagine, along the entire line of combat contact "flocks" of such machines "work". Impact - moved five to ten kilometers. Again he landed three or four mines. He left again. And so - all night. The enemy’s brains will boil! In addition, in the afternoon, a convoy of relatively small jeeps will not attract attention on public roads. They can be completely disguised as communication machines or even some. This is not a tracked "Carnation" or "Nona-S", which is uniquely identified as military equipment.
    But it’s embarrassing for the high location of the mortar itself - will the car tip over when shooting?
  14. 0
    28 August 2017 20: 35
    Quote: Zaurbek
    This 82mm mortar will be and how to fire a direct-fire gun?

    If so, the tool will be more universal.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"