Military Review
Sign In Register

The newest self-propelled gun 2С42 will replace the Air Force "Nona" and "Waxman"

24
Model of the newest self-propelled gun 2С42, created for the Airborne Forces as part of the experimental design work (R & D) “Lotus” was presented at the Army-2017 forum held in the Moscow Region, reports Messenger of Mordovia.

The newest self-propelled gun 2С42 will replace the Air Force "Nona" and "Waxman"


Specialists of the Main Missile-Artillery Directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense familiarized visitors with this development of the exhibition.

According to the report, "120-mm SAO is designed to equip artillery battalions of parachute (assault) regiments and brigades." Also, the machine will come into service artillery regiments of the amphibious divisions.

It is assumed that 2C42 "Lotos" will replace in the troops of the CAO 2C9 "Nona-S", 2C9-1 "Waxwing" and 2C9 -1М "Nona-SM".



The main characteristics of the "Lotus":

- Maximum firing range -13 km.
- The minimum firing range - 1 km.
- Aimed rate of fire - 6-8 shots / min.

Tool pointing angles:
- horizontally - 360 hail.
- vertically - from -4 to + 80 hail.

Transfer time from the traveling position and back - 30 seconds.
Mass SAO - 18 t.

Maximum speed:
- on the highway - 70 km / h.
- on the ground - 40 km / h.

Power reserve -500 km

Crew - 4 people.

Developer: TsNIITochmash.

Photos used:
http://vestnik-rm.ru
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
24 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 28 August 2017 09: 53
    +2
    T / e in the Russian Army are still considering the possibility of mass parachute landing?
    PS. So good?
    1. 210ox
      210ox 28 August 2017 10: 01
      +3
      Not in the RA .. And in the Russian Army .., PSVZH you can put it on the "Israel Defense Forces" This is a topic of respect.
      Quote: Aaron Zawi
      Does the RA still consider the possibilities of mass parachute landing?
      1. WHAT IS
        WHAT IS 28 August 2017 10: 06
        +4
        Don’t swear, Uncle ... I, too, צבא הגנה לישראל do not always capitalize ... This is not out of disrespect ... But Aron singled out .......... good
        1. 210ox
          210ox 28 August 2017 10: 12
          +2
          Alex, excuse me .. But why do you have an Orenburger (I hope you are from there .. and with a capital letter) the flag is not from here? Yes, and in principle, let's article .. A good car I hope. Octopus will be a rival ..
          Quote: WHAT IS
          Don’t swear, Uncle ... I, too, צבא הגנה לישראל do not always capitalize ... This is not out of disrespect ... But Aron singled out .......... good
          1. WHAT IS
            WHAT IS 28 August 2017 10: 19
            +3
            Dim, why didn’t you recognize Brother Kolya? laughing laughing laughing Lyokha, IPC 105 ... feel And come on you, I’m so used to talking with people ... If you can ... Sorry mua, musi-savsem pazabyl-on the banner do not pay any attention, I have a Putin hacker put a few programs ... wink
            1. 210ox
              210ox 28 August 2017 10: 47
              +1
              Good afternoon! Nikolay .. hi That's how it happens ...
              Quote: WHAT IS
              Dim, why didn’t you recognize Brother Kolya? laughing laughing laughing Lyokha, IPC 105 ... feel And come on you, I’m so used to talking with people ... If you can ... Sorry mua, musi-savsem pazabyl-on the banner do not pay any attention, I have a Putin hacker put a few programs ... wink
    2. novel66
      novel66 28 August 2017 10: 02
      +2
      what, scary ?!
    3. kapitan92
      kapitan92 28 August 2017 10: 06
      +5
      [quote = Aron Zaavi] T / e in the Russian Army are still considering the possibility of mass parachute landing?
      [quote] It is assumed that 2C42 "Lotus" will replace the troops CAO 2S9 "Nona-S", 2S9-1 "Waxwing" and 2S9 -1M "Nona-SM" [/ quote]
      What does it have to do with massive parachute landing? There is a planned rearmament art. Airborne brigades. hi
      1. AUL
        AUL 28 August 2017 10: 13
        0
        The newest self-propelled gun 2С42 will replace the Air Force "Nona" and "Waxman"
        Really so replace? So far, there is only her model at the exhibition, what will happen to her (and whether it will work at all) - it is not known whether she will like the Moscow Region - all the more, but already - will replace it! Magazines, modest would be necessary! Do not advertise laying!
      2. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 28 August 2017 14: 29
        0
        And not only! These art systems are still in the Marine Corps and in the border troops.
    4. Topotun
      Topotun 28 August 2017 10: 35
      +3
      A large country requires mobile units to provide defense for its territories. Try to quickly transfer the aircraft to 6500 km (from Moscow somewhere to the Vladivostok region) .... If you are worried about a possible mass landing on Israel, in vain. Nafik is not necessary ....
      1. Lopatov
        Lopatov 28 August 2017 11: 16
        +3
        Quote: Topotun
        If you are concerned about a possible mass landing on Israel, in vain. Nafik is not necessary ....

        And do not beg for 8)))))))
    5. owl
      owl 28 August 2017 15: 47
      0
      Quote: Aron Zaavi
      massive parachute landing

      I will not say about the mass and "landing" after all, nanotechnology laughing but I don’t understand how this tractor can replace the same “Nona”, it’s twice as heavy if you believe “Mordva”
  2. VAZ2106
    VAZ2106 28 August 2017 10: 04
    0
    similar to "vein"
    1. Lopatov
      Lopatov 28 August 2017 10: 09
      +4
      But it seems not her. With a range finder, a "bucket", in theory, there should be more
      1. Nicholas C.
        Nicholas C. 28 August 2017 10: 53
        +1
        Vienna has a six-wheeled chassis. This one has seven rinks. Like Kurganets. But Kurganets’s larger rollers.
        1. Lopatov
          Lopatov 28 August 2017 11: 13
          +2
          The base does not really matter. Opportunities are important. "Vienna" is able to work effectively with a closed OP, and as a direct fire fire support vehicle. Because it is intended for battalion artillery. Here, apparently, a self-propelled gun
          1. Nicholas C.
            Nicholas C. 28 August 2017 11: 37
            0
            Tool pointing angles:
            - vertically - from -4 to + 80 hail.

            He looked at the chassis to make sure it was not Vienna.
            And the angles of guidance like Vienna. In theory, and should be applied as Vienna.
            1. Lopatov
              Lopatov 28 August 2017 12: 13
              +1
              Quote: Nikolai S.
              And the angles of guidance like Vienna.

              The gun is the same, like ammunition. Large hover angles are more likely for 120 mm min. I don’t see much need to use expensive 122-mm shells with ready-made protrusions for rifling for mortar shooting, when there are mines
              1. Nicholas C.
                Nicholas C. 28 August 2017 12: 30
                0
                By the way, something else is curious from the picture. Hatches of three crew members not from the tower.
                Those. in the AZ tower? Then why the crew - 4 people.
                Or now the commander and gunner are sitting with the driver. Is there one loader in BO?
  3. tchoni
    tchoni 28 August 2017 11: 00
    +1
    Honestly: the logic of the designers is horrifying: since it’s self-propelled guns, we make it a tank and tank patterns ((((. Again, the tightness of the fighting compartment. It would be nice if it were compensated by any serious armor ... And so - armor made of plywood and beat in half? Meaning? I don’t see ....
    1. JD1979
      JD1979 28 August 2017 12: 53
      +1
      Ummm ... the meaning of your statement? I don’t see ... They didn’t sit inside, but we condemn. Serious armor on sau? What is this? Combined multilayer plus VDZ and KAZ? So, according to your terrifying logic, you get a tank. It seems to everyone it is known that mortars and howitzers do not work direct fire and that no one and no where doesn’t make anti-ballistic reservations. As well as not putting equipment for quick response units and landing units on heavy tank chassis. And for your ass to be whole, use a pillow.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Grach-25sm
    Grach-25sm 28 August 2017 19: 36
    0
    The fire support tool is just for the Airborne Forces, the Marine Corps, the Border Guards, as well as for light brigades. It would be interesting to see how self-propelled guns or SAO? The Lotus would interact with that pickup truck with an automated Zushka in the back. Samum, it seems? ..
    The only range is small - only 13 kilometers. Such an installation would be about twenty km reactive-reactive, with satellite guidance, and with an expanded nomenclature (cumulative, armor-piercing, concrete-fragmentation high-explosive, actively reactive long-range, shrapnel and cluster with programmable trajectory detonation, volume-detonating). That would be nice. Another question - do they want to make Lotus airborne / floating ?.
  5. Foxmara
    Foxmara 29 August 2017 10: 42
    0
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    T / e in the Russian Army are still considering the possibility of mass parachute landing?

    We don’t have hummers, there’s nothing to be afraid of) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gQaBXRalrg