The most-most: Tank T-90

18
How the T-90 was created, how it is constructed, how this combat vehicle is manufactured now and what its modernized versions are.

    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    18 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      26 August 2017 10: 32
      a good tank, long run-in and tested, the experience of the Syrian conflict showed that it holds well even hit even missiles (ATGM)
      1. +2
        26 August 2017 12: 36
        For the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, the devil knows how many years are not produced ...
        1. +1
          27 August 2017 10: 17
          DOCTOR ZLO
          For the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, the devil knows how many years are not produced ...
          Do you need him? Or maybe T14 place not to occupy. Or more and more? And in minutes defense, believe me, not stupid people work.
          1. +2
            27 August 2017 11: 11
            And how many armatures do you have in your troops? Stop talking nonsense
          2. 0
            27 August 2017 13: 08
            Quote: Observer2014
            DOCTOR ZLO
            For the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, the devil knows how many years are not produced ...
            Do you need him? Or maybe T14 place not to occupy. Or more and more? And in minutes defense, believe me, not stupid people work.

            Do not logically reason. If the T-90 CM is better than the T-72Б3, then why is the latter delivered for the RF Armed Forces, and the first for export ...
            Or did we go along the path of the British Vickers Designer, who developed individual samples of tanks for export?
            So it turns out the 2 400 T-14 in armored units and formations of the RF Armed Forces is a dream, like the T-90СМ, but the working days and reality of the RF Armed Forces upgraded to impossible T-72 ...
        2. +2
          27 August 2017 14: 05
          Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
          For the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, the devil knows how many years are not produced ...

          Kolich. T72, T80 and T90 The Russian armament surpasses 13.000.000 units, and in storage more than 8.000 units of tanks of earlier models. Even China has half as many tanks as Russia. Modernization in terms of "price / quality" is more profitable, and the production of fundamentally new T-14 IMHO needs to be deployed
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +8
                  27 August 2017 15: 53
                  Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
                  I will be happier if in the skillful hands of our tankers there will be T-90 and T-14, and not the old T-72, have you heard anything about aging metal?

                  I understand (although I do not fully share) your righteous indignation, but here it is there is absolutely no side leaning yet ...
                  1. 0
                    27 August 2017 16: 04
                    Golovan Jack I understand (although I do not fully share) Your righteous indignation

                    But what do you not share (I'm not talking about the aging of metal)?
                    1. +8
                      27 August 2017 18: 46
                      Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
                      But what do you not share (I'm not talking about the aging of metal)?

                      I’ll tell you such a fairy tale: I once served this on the T64B, which was never exported. Nowhere, even in the Warsaw Pact.
                      Think because the bad car was? Nope:
                      - laser sight range finder (1G42 called if sclerosis does not change. Fairy tale ...)
                      - ballistic computer, also a useful thing
                      - complex "Cobra" (optional, not far away. Expensive because). This is the same "missile through the barrel", yeah.
                      - and many other goodies.

                      Therefore, it was not exported, by the way.

                      About T90SM (originally an export version, by the way. They call the "local" AM). So, who said that he is so super-duper better than the very T72B3? I do not observe this from open sources ...
                      And the fact that "raising" to B3 72-ku is several times cheaper than building a new T90AM - do not even go to a fortuneteller.

                      And now, in the Moscow Region, it’s not pests or “victims of the Unified State Examination” who are sitting, as I think, but people who have information about potential military threats to the Russian Federation. And since they decided that T72B3 is enough for now - well, that’s how it should be.

                      Here are some thoughts about mnu on this topic feel
                      1. 0
                        27 August 2017 19: 09
                        Golovan Jack Think because the bad car was?

                        I don’t think, but I know. The T-64 is a revolutionary model, many revolutionary ideas were applied there, however it is a technically difficult tank to maintain and operate, which is why the APU does not spare them (and because of this, the T-64 is the only tank that was not exported and not only to countries ATS) and throws it into the heat, and drinks exclusively T-72 and diesel T-80 abroad ...
                        In essence, the T-72 is an improved version of the T-64, the Urals had to create a new tank, cheap and reliable for mobilization SA, namely the T-72 is the most common tank in the world .....
                        For the rest, I probably agree, provided that at the price-quality T-72Б3 is not inferior to T-90СМ ...
                        1. +8
                          27 August 2017 19: 41
                          Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
                          I don’t think, but I know ...

                          What you wrote further inspires thoughts about the Internet, as a source of knowledge ... I repeat: I served on this "difficult to maintain". And I had three of them: 10 years, 10 years and 8 years (the youngest). Yes, on one engine they messed up, but there the mechanic itself ... such, in short. And there weren’t any more problems with them - and they drove and shot ... you need to look after the typewriter, and everything will be tip-top.

                          Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
                          In essence, the T-72 is an improved version of the T-64

                          A very ... controversial statement. T72 - a completely different machine compared to the sixty-four.
                          I ... rode on it and shot it ... friends in Taman served them, it just so happened.

                          Voooot ....
                2. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              27 August 2017 22: 21
              Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
              And I’m not observing the production of T-14 yet .... so hang your noodles on the ears of someone else ...

              You do not throw your noodles ... Junk in your head ...
              1. 0
                28 August 2017 00: 34
                Quote: Nick
                Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
                And I’m not observing the production of T-14 yet .... so hang your noodles on the ears of someone else ...

                You do not throw your noodles ... Junk in your head ...

                Troll again, there is nothing to say about your nonsense about the supply of T-14 to line units ... only the weak, but ready to offend ...
    2. 0
      26 August 2017 21: 28
      I'm certainly a patriot and all that! But! Objectivity is necessary! What could the t90 be like? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uXhuK8nem5g
    3. 0
      26 August 2017 21: 29
      Here are some more slippers! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PguL5goHbtI
    4. 0
      26 August 2017 21: 39
      I would like more specifics with numbers and comparisons. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MeD-OoIg9R4
    5. 0
      26 August 2017 21: 50
      Abrams can spit birds too. At 12 km. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v25O67vj6KU
    6. +2
      27 August 2017 12: 31
      T-90 "Black Eagle" (Omsk KBTM) was more interesting: a seven-track chassis (like in Almaty) and much more.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"