US general announced US intention to fight in Afghanistan until victory

65
As the Associated Press news agency (AP) reported on Thursday, General John Nicholson, commander of the US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, told reporters in Kabul that the United States intends to remain in Afghanistan until the final victory.

We will not fail in Afghanistan
- he said. -
Both our national security and the national security of Afghanistan and our allies depend on it.


US general announced US intention to fight in Afghanistan until victory


According to him, the Afghan security forces, with the support of the American and NATO forces, will destroy the Islamic State and Al-Qaida militants *, reports TASS

The American general also appealed to the Taliban militants with a call to stop fighting.

Stop fighting with compatriots, fold weapon and integrate into afghan society
- urged the general

A Taliban spokesman rejected the proposal.

We will not lay down arms and the Taliban will continue to fight until the last American soldier leaves Afghanistan.
- A Taliban spokesman said in an interview with AP.

On Monday, US President Donald Trump announced a new US strategy on Afghanistan. As Fox News reported on Tuesday, the head of state decided to send 4 thousand American troops to Afghanistan in addition to the 8,4 thousand already stationed there.

Islamic State * Al-Qaida * Taliban * - Banned in Russia
  • https://twitter.com/TOLOnews
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    August 24 2017
    On Monday, US President Donald Trump announced a new US strategy on Afghanistan. As Fox News reported on Tuesday, the head of state decided to send 4 thousand American troops to Afghanistan in addition to the 8,4 thousand already stationed there.


    Every 4 years in the US, the president announces the "new US strategy for Afghanistan" ... The groundhog continues (day in cycles every four years).
    1. +28
      August 24 2017
      declared US intention * to fight in Afghanistan until victory

      ... until the complete victory of the Afghan people over the aggressor

      * USA - banned in Belarus
      1. +12
        August 24 2017
        Quote: Thrall
        * USA - banned in Belarus

        Test trolling! good
        1. +3
          August 24 2017
          It doesn’t matter what REALLY will be in Afghanistan.
          The United States may well bomb a couple of hospitals, and declare this a "final victory."
          Media is a terrible weapon.
          Quote: Kurare
          Quote: Thrall
          * USA - banned in Belarus

          Test trolling! good

          AHA good
          1. +2
            August 24 2017
            US general announced US intention to fight in Afghanistan until victory

            This is good news, comrades. This is the end of the United States, if they really intend to fight "to victory." drinks
            1. +2
              August 25 2017
              We will not fail in Afghanistan
              many thought so, but over the centuries, none of Afghanistan returned with victory
            2. +1
              August 25 2017
              Yes, history does not teach them anything.
              The impudent people have already fought the Afghans and ... where are they?
              Someone will say that the USSR fought.
              In fact, we had no goal of conquering Afghanistan or defeating someone there!
              And the mattresses, yes ... they are strong laughing
              They need to fit the drumsticks and the flag in w ..., sorry, in their mighty ass.

              Either trenches, or graves ...?!
      2. +4
        August 24 2017
        Quote: Thrall
        USA - banned in Belarus

        This one, you have to throw such jokes on Fridays. I'm already laid. Full laughter stuff and what will I tell the boss?
      3. +3
        August 24 2017
        Quote: Thrall
        ... until the complete victory of the Afghan people over the aggressor

        good
        would rather ...
        US general announced US intention to fight in Afghanistan until victory

        the question is - where was the last time the United States fought before the victory (in terms of its victory, and not the opposing regime) ?!
        1. +5
          August 24 2017
          Quote: self-propelled
          the question is - where did the USA last fight before victory

          You are abusing yankaf. Grenada, Panama, Purto Rico can finally be a quasi state
          1. +7
            August 24 2017
            Quote: Tusv
            You are abusing yankaf. Grenada, Panama, Purto Rico can finally be a quasi state

            ah, how could I forget !? it was a GREAT VICTORY! excuse me cowardly wassat
            1. +3
              August 24 2017
              Quote: self-propelled
              ah, how could I forget !? it was a GREAT VICTORY! excuse me cowardly

              I forgive you. But actually it is written through Firth am Felic victories
    2. +2
      August 24 2017
      Quote: Kurare
      Every 4 years in the US, the president announces a “new US strategy for Afghanistan” ...

      Jackals Strategy. start wars around the world and eat it! Striped people will not leave this opium-heroin bed until thousands of wooden jackets covered with a striped rag begin to flow across the ocean! The "exceptional" do not understand the other arguments! An example of Vietnam apparently forgot! And Afghanistan in obstinacy is no worse than Vietnam!
      1. +7
        August 25 2017
        And this general wants to fight before ... whose victory? ... and to whom? Does this “strategist” understand that he has climbed into a country that no one has yet defeated? negative
  2. +5
    August 24 2017
    The Taliban very much doubt it ... Shuravi too!
    USA is too presumptuous.! I think the United States will not send their own there, but vassals (drug addicts)))) .. As meat!
    1. +10
      August 24 2017
      I would show the film to the Junkers as a teaching tool before sending it to Afghanistan
      1. +18
        August 24 2017
        He forgot to add: War to the last Afghan!
        I do not like the Taliban, how terrible. But now I'm on their side ...
        1. +12
          August 24 2017
          Sasha! But, as clearly noted: Throughout history, no one has ever managed to conquer Afghanistan.
          1. +1
            August 24 2017
            American general announces US intention fight

            Uncle General, but who is fighting like that? smile
          2. +15
            August 24 2017
            Everything is simple. They respect their enemies. And for those whom they respect, they take revenge! And here lies the answer. Americans are not enemies, for the Taliban and the rest, they are unfaithful jackals! Therefore, everyone hates them, without exception ... (It was the same with us)
            Therefore, they were not defeated. Everyone fought on one side. And you need to defeat all at once !!!
            One dzhigit told me about this ...
            1. +3
              August 24 2017
              Quote: Logall
              Everything is simple. They respect their enemies. And for those whom they respect, they take revenge! And here lies the answer. Americans are not enemies, for the Taliban and the rest, they are unfaithful jackals! Therefore, everyone hates them, without exception ... (It was the same with us)
              Therefore, they were not defeated. Everyone fought on one side. And you need to defeat all at once !!!
              One dzhigit told me about this ...

              basically correct, but there are some BUT,
              1. Afghanistan will never be captured.
              2. No one can rule Afghanistan.
              3. Afghanistan will bury all aggressors.
              This was said (allegorically at the academy and this is evident from the story).
              1. +17
                August 24 2017
                No one has set such a goal. Neither capture nor control. Their territory is important only as a transit zone. And that’s it!
                Do you really think that if the USSR, or now the USA, decided to take over this land, they would not have expelled the spirits? Per month! Would bring down all !!! But, what then was the USSR, what is now the USA, trying to establish control by local forces. Because Afghanistan is hemorrhoids, which is needed only by its owners !!!
          3. 0
            August 24 2017
            10 myths about Afghanistan
            http://inosmi.ru/asia/20111003/175432032.html
            http://psicho.5bb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=441
            And more myths ..
            http://www.bogru.ru/statyi/russia/219-trinadcat-s
            kazok-dlja-proigravshej-civilizacii-demonstracija
            -liberalnyh-mifov-s-ih-posledujushhim-razoblachen
            iem.html hi
        2. +1
          August 24 2017
          Quote: Logall
          He forgot to add: War to the last Afghan!
          I do not like the Taliban, how terrible. But now I'm on their side ...

          why be on one side?
          The Americans have nothing to do there, they definitely went out.
          The Taliban are also not the Afghan people, but the barbarians of Muslim radicalism.

          Taliban propaganda incidentally at the level of
          We will not lay down arms and the Taliban will continue to fight until the last American soldier leaves Afghanistan.,
          how the Taliban correctly answered the popular claims of the USA, however
        3. +2
          August 25 2017
          Quote: Logall
          I do not like the Taliban


          This is a private matter, who knows *

          The main thing is not to touch or meddle with your charter.
      2. +1
        August 25 2017
        I would show the film to the Junkers as a teaching tool before sending it to Afghanistan

        I'm afraid that the Yankees will not help anything. Even watching this movie. Only the blood of their own soldiers can somehow sober up the mind of these brave and self-confident generals.
        1. +4
          August 25 2017
          I agree! Only the death of their own soldiers in their drum ....
    2. 0
      August 24 2017
      We will send you, you will definitely decide everything!
  3. +4
    August 24 2017
    Is the Pentagon afraid of putting the drug trade in the hands of the Islamic State * and Al Qaeda? Who would doubt that such resources would bring additional funds to the Islamists
  4. 0
    August 24 2017
    Fight the Yankees, the flag in your hands.
    1. 0
      August 24 2017
      The Yankees are afraid of the Taliban coming to power, who will throw them out and restore order in the country according to the age-old laws of the peoples of this country.
      1. +4
        August 24 2017
        Yankees fear Taliban coming to power


        Yes, not a damn thing they are not afraid. 34 million people !!!! and a bunch of American soldiers. And all they need to do is keep airfields and bases to control Iran, Pakistan, India and Russia underbelly. And they competently pit these 34 million with each other, and they do not care about their heroin, education, medicine. That we foolishly wanted to build a normal life there. And the Americans only need a lured government in Kabul - and even if they cut each other's throats. Moreover, there is always someone to pit there with whom - a bunch of people, even the language is not the same.
  5. +10
    August 24 2017
    We will not lay down arms and the Taliban will continue to fight until the last American soldier leaves Afghanistan.
    Taliban spokesman said in an interview with AP over the phone


    They are right. Nothing for the Americans to do there. With the introduction of American troops, heroin production has grown significantly.
    What humanitarian and educational programs are carried out by the UN and the American government? What has been done to combat drug trafficking. Even after the withdrawal of Russian troops, the FSKN initially delayed heroin wagons, then the bill went to hundreds of kg. And now the struggle continues with the participation of the government of Afghanistan. What is the US contribution to this?
  6. +2
    August 24 2017
    It’s good when the language is boneless and there is no brain ... You can become an American general.
  7. +5
    August 24 2017
    Pin - sys never voluntarily leave Afghanistan. Opiate trade and pressure on the entire region. India, China, Pakistan, and so on will be scammed from Afghanistan.
  8. +1
    August 24 2017
    Until the last American soldier laughing
  9. +2
    August 24 2017
    and even let me see it somewhere ...
  10. +5
    August 24 2017
    We will not fail in Afghanistan

    wassat wassat laughing For 400 years, no one could conquer and pacify Afghanistan ...
    Good luck, holy fools! wassat
  11. +2
    August 24 2017
    The British Empire also fought in Afghanistan until victory ... lol
  12. MMX
    0
    August 24 2017
    Well, actually, it’s logical. Otherwise, why then fight?
  13. +4
    August 24 2017
    Journalists have become ....... belay Before the press conference they could have arranged a test for the brave general, they would have asked some tricky questions: in what part of the world is Afghanistan ?; from which country is the general himself and show it on the globe ?; why do Afghans fight so often with Honduras? .... And, suddenly, the general is right for everything sad answer-would ask the main question, how does the general understand the victory in Afghanistan? -Afghans abandoned the US occupation ?; there are no Afghans left in Afghanistan ?; all Afghans converted to Catholicism? ....
  14. +1
    August 24 2017
    It only remains to wish the honorable general to skip as little as possible ... from the Taliban. And just in case, it would be useful to study Odessa folklore, such as: "And who was with ambition, he will be without", having embarked on the warpath in Afghanistan.
  15. +3
    August 24 2017
    US intends to remain in Afghanistan until final victory
    .
    ..... The sponsors of terrorism, they want to defeat the terrorists ... Bees against honey ...
  16. +3
    August 24 2017
    A Taliban spokesman rejected the proposal.
    We will not lay down arms and the Taliban will continue to fight until the last American soldier leaves Afghanistan.
    - A Taliban spokesman said in an interview with AP.

    Not finished correctly.
    "Until the last American soldier leaves Afghanistan in a coffin."
    That will be more true.

    Afghans are interesting people. Day farmer, and at night dushman. Or maybe vice versa.
    Americans will have to completely destroy all Afghans.
    As soon as the Afghans understand what’s what, the number of attacks on the US army will increase tenfold. I think that there will be no shortage of weapons and production of the PRC.
    And Pakistan will launch refugee camps in our young days.
    Let it slurp that we slurp.
    Only the number of boxes will be different at times.
  17. +5
    August 24 2017


    wassat good laughing laughing laughing
  18. 0
    August 24 2017
    SGA - the aggressor! Occupant! Down with the Afghan lands! You can shout;) In fact, with drugs they made a real poppy paradise there! I think the SGA will be thrown off as once the Chinese - the British. True, the Anglo-Saxons drank a lot of blood in China.
  19. +1
    August 24 2017
    Flag in hand, a drum on the neck and a train to meet!
  20. +5
    August 24 2017
    The general smokes, and not the grass at all.
    This is opium. Complete victories he dreamed of.
    He needs to be treated, although it may be too late ...
  21. +5
    August 24 2017
    Mattresses will remain in Afghanistan until the victory of the Taliban, and not over the Taliban. Rather, it will be so.
  22. +1
    August 24 2017
    They are afraid of mattresses to lose poppy plantations
  23. 0
    August 24 2017
    Normal, normal) the more blocks and pin dosov bend, killing each other - the better. I bless the "valiant" troops of both sides of the conflict for mutual annihilation.
  24. 0
    August 25 2017
    "We will not fail in Afghanistan"
    - he said.
    Does the general declare this? What do they learn at their military institutes and universities? It took the Russian Empire, the USSR, and then Russia a hundred years of continuous wars and numerous, well-trained troops, competent generals and officers to defeat the brave highlanders. Does he really think that it will be easier in Afghanistan?
  25. 0
    August 25 2017
    To summarize briefly, he said only one thing: "we have supplied, are supplying and will continue to supply gerychs on an industrial scale to Russia and Europe." In general, he did not say anything new.
  26. +2
    August 25 2017
    And deduce and enter tongue lol
    1. +3
      August 25 2017
      Quote: Magua
      And deduce and enter


      Great out laughing laughing laughing
  27. 0
    August 25 2017
    After the conquest of Central Asia by Russia, Britain proposed to make Afghanistan a buffer zone by signing the corresponding treaty. Russia agreed to this, signed the treaty and meticulously executed it, but Britain immediately violated it, unleashed several Anglo-Afghan wars and always got it ... ( TSB, Wiki- Anglo-Afghan Wars)!
  28. +2
    August 25 2017
    We will not fail in Afghanistan

    The USSR also thought so. BUT! And they fought with dignity. And they went out with dignity.

    Afghans themselves say that they say it was at least interesting to fight with us. Rather than with these.

    On the subject: US fight in Afghanistan to victory

    They won’t succeed!
  29. 0
    August 25 2017
    From Afghanistan, make a second Vietnam in response to the lethal weapon Khokhlam.
  30. 0
    August 25 2017
    They can win (and then only temporarily). Win, never.
  31. 0
    August 25 2017
    Something they were doing in Afghanistan, probably resting and growing poppy. They will fight with the Afghans, until the last poppy plantation.
    1. 0
      August 25 2017
      There probably all the military have poppy fields. President Trump alone doesn’t have it, just so he’s not mistaken, and doesn’t capture Obama and Clinton fields, otherwise they will be eternal enemies. Then they are after this food, the pilots bomb where there are still whole houses.
  32. 0
    August 25 2017
    It is even interesting, over whom, or even rather over what, were the Americans going to win? Could it be that over poppy by chance? lol
  33. 0
    August 25 2017
    He didn’t specify, before Whose victory did they start fighting there?
  34. +7
    August 25 2017
    We will not fail in Afghanistan

    Here all those who came to fight in Afghanistan said something similar. The result is the same - no one succeeded in conquering this country.
    So let the striped ones shake the air further.
    But they are not there for the sake of victory and the fight against terrorism. They rushed there for herkych. And the fight with someone there is just a cover.
  35. 0
    August 25 2017
    "The American general announced the intention of the United States to fight in Afghanistan until victory" -
    promising statement that from the lips of the Americans means "war until the destruction of the last Afghan"

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"