Military Review
Sign In Register

For the first time, the Northern PKB presented an export version of the 21810 project's medium landing ship.

13
According to the news portal FlotpromThe Northern Design Bureau for the first time presented at the Army-2017 forum an export version of the medium landing ship (KFOR) of the 21810 project.

For the first time, the Northern PKB presented an export version of the 21810 project's medium landing ship.


The project is said to have been going on for about 10 years. The absence of an order from the country's military department forced the enterprise to create an export modification.

KFOR of project 21810 is intended for landing on an unequipped shore and destruction of enemy forces before landing. The ship's displacement is about 1600 tons, length - 97 m, width - 11 m. KFOR is capable of speeds up to 16 knots, its autonomy - 30 days, cruising range - up to 2,5 thousand miles. The crew of the ship is 47 people. He is able to carry five tanks weighing up to 55 tons each, as well as up to 200 people, including tankers, and 300 tons of military cargo.

The armament is represented by the flamethrowing and incendiary shipboard A-22 “Fire” complex (110 rocket projectiles of the X-NUMX caliber 45 mm) and the unguided rocket complex weapons A-215 "Grad-M" with two launchers MS-73 (110 reactive high-explosive shells M-21OF caliber 122 mm. Installation two 30-mm automatic gun mount AK-630M or two anti-aircraft missile and gun systems "Palm" 8 MANPADS "Igla" make antiaircraft armament. A helicopter with a mass of up to 12 tons can be on board the ship.

The export version of the assault ship is supposed to be equipped with two Finnish Wartsila diesel engines with 2700 kW each.
Photos used:
http://flotprom.ru/2017/%D0%A4%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%90%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%8F258/
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
13 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. San Sanych
    San Sanych 24 August 2017 09: 11
    +3
    an attempt to revive the project 770 (Polnocny), perhaps a good idea, at the time the ships of this project were very in demand
  2. Dangerous
    Dangerous 24 August 2017 09: 44
    +5
    Reading the latest news (about 5 years ago), one gets the feeling that our design bureaus and the Ministry of Defense are behaving like some kind of design studio. Something beautiful is being designed, sketches, layouts, photoshopped photos, and in fact zero. There is no longer a sense of exclusivity of our military equipment, that ours is the coolest and better. So, mockups are stamped, in the hope that someone will like it. What are these sketches of destroyers, what is an aircraft carrier, what are endless upgrades and options for the t-90, now no one needs a ship.
  3. Rokossovsky
    Rokossovsky 24 August 2017 09: 46
    +2
    The lack of an order from the military department of the country forced the company to create an export modification

    recourse
    KFOR is capable of speeds up to 16 knots, its autonomy - 30 days, cruising range - up to 2,5 thousand miles. The crew of the ship is 47 people. It is capable of transporting five tanks weighing up to 55 tons each, as well as up to 200 people, including tankers, and 300 tons of military cargo

    Characteristics, frankly, are not impressive ...
    In comparison with the same Gren:
    The ship of the 11711 project is capable of landing on an unequipped shore up to 300 marines, 40 armored personnel carriers or 13 tanks. On the deck, "Ivan Gren" carries two Ka-29 helicopters
    Cruising range - 3 500 nautical miles at 16 nodes

    request
    I think it’s obvious why the Navy chose the project of the Nevsky Design Bureau
    1. Berkut24
      Berkut24 24 August 2017 10: 54
      +4
      I think it’s obvious why the Navy chose the project of the Nevsky Design Bureau

      And then as a temporary measure. In the Russian Defense Ministry there is no consensus on the strategy of landing operations - what they will be and in which regions. thus. MO can not yet formulate the task and give the terms of reference for development. All these projects of everything and everything are being created on the initiative by the factories themselves. You can understand them, but Min. You can’t get through this defense now. The General Staff is trying to understand the balance of power in 5-20 years, what problems will be and how they will be solved.
      I wonder how the MO got out of Syria - they just bought old dry cargo ships. Cheap and cheerful. This operation does not require landing on an unequipped shore when resisting from the shore. But what a real landing will look like and in which region is the question ...
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 24 August 2017 11: 10
      +5
      Quote: Rokossovsky

      The lack of an order from the military department of the country forced the company to create an export modification
      recourse
      KFOR is capable of speeds up to 16 knots, its autonomy - 30 days, cruising range - up to 2,5 thousand miles. The crew of the ship is 47 people. It is capable of transporting five tanks weighing up to 55 tons each, as well as up to 200 people, including tankers, and 300 tons of military cargo

      Characteristics, frankly, are not impressive ...

      1. SDK can be used on closed MTVD: Caspian Sea, Black Sea, Baltic.
      2. PDO Suppression System - Suitable. Moreover, there is a spinner - Ka-52 is possible.
      3. The air defense system - not to the Red Army ... There will not be enough MANPADS, even such as Willow. Need a complex type "Chestnut" / "Palm" or "Carapace". Although DesO is carried out while gaining dominance in the air and isolating the landing area from the enemy’s IOS, nooooo ... a lot of examples ... Especially in the age of anti-ship missiles and UAVs.
      4. Airborne landing facilities. Possible Ka-29. But it’s for tactical groups behind enemy lines - to cut the communications of the reinforcements approach, to destroy headquarters and other important objects in the depths of the enemy’s defense ...
      And the bulk is afloat !? And engineering structures, minefields? Well, they’ll sort things out, punch the aisles ... But these bottlenecks are dangerous because they are usually clogged at the most inopportune moment ... He doesn’t have ICE capable of quickly moving the landing force ashore beyond the PDO. Well, it’s not UDC, but only KFOR ... (yesterday).
      5. The speed of 16 bonds is a mockery of common sense. The Amans transatlantic convoys (speedy) run at a speed of 26-30 knots! We have mdkvp t. "Bison" - 60uz! Landing boats in the cavity - under 45-50 knots (depending on the load). And here - 16 knots. Given that DesO is planned based on the loading and transfer of detachment ships in the dark, will the KFOR go far in 6 dark hours? (Unless of course this is a polar night!).
      6. Based on the foregoing, it is time to order landing SCREENS !!!
      This will be our answer to Curzon!
      I think so.
      1. Petrol cutter
        Petrol cutter 24 August 2017 12: 24
        +1
        "6. Based on the foregoing, it is time to order landing SCREENS !!!"
        Duck here whole "holivors" were about the benefits and harms of ekranoplan for the USSR Armed Forces. The impression was that most experts were very negative about this type of technology.
  4. Ingvar0401
    Ingvar0401 24 August 2017 10: 02
    +2
    As for the characteristics, I agree completely. Well, it can go somewhere for export ....
    1. vanavatny
      vanavatny 24 August 2017 10: 10
      0
      Yeah, to understand where ... with our pace of construction and experience thereof ...
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 24 August 2017 11: 14
        +2
        Quote: vanavate
        with our construction rates and experience ...

        If there is an order, they will build it quickly: all systems have already been worked out, there are no complicated radio electronics. And we learned how to rivet corpses (without stuffing) of such sizes. KFOR is essentially armed transport. And his main weapon is a ramp!
        1. vanavatny
          vanavatny 24 August 2017 11: 18
          0
          oh, I’m an optimist myself, although believe it, it’s not easy ... what
  5. anti-submarine
    anti-submarine 24 August 2017 10: 27
    0
    If interested, there are more photos of the model ..... http: //shipmodels.pro/custom-models/warship-
    models / (not advertising)
  6. magadan72
    magadan72 24 August 2017 14: 30
    +2
    An outdated project from the past ...
  7. Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 24 August 2017 17: 45
    0
    There is more than enough BDK for the Russian Federation, and it is too early to write them off, so in about 10 years you need to start a series of KFORs, such that they go by inland waterways, and even more are less demanding to the shore than the BDK, the BDK must be abandoned in all marine fleets, and partially on the ocean