Military Review

National Interest: Russian “Calibers” pose a threat to both Europe and the USA

47
The Russian fleet can deliver rocket attacks not only for the most part of Northern and Western Europe, but also anywhere in the world, a recent test of the Caliber missile confirms this, writes The National Interest.



“The other day the Russian Ministry of Defense published a video of the successful launch of a sea-launched Caliber missile from the nuclear submarine Severodvinsk in the Barents Sea. This video confirms that Russian shock submarines can attack any target on the globe. But after the end of the Cold War, it was mainly the naval forces of Western countries that were capable of this, ”the article cites. InoTV.

Also, the Russian Navy can "deliver rocket attacks on most of Northern and Western Europe from their surface combat ships and non-nuclear submarines," the author continues.

Thus, the Northern, Baltic, Black Sea and Caspian fleets can pose a threat to vast territories in Europe and the Middle East. Perhaps (rocket) will fly to some countries of the Persian Gulf,
quotes the edition of the senior center employee James Martin Nikolay Sokov.

The author notes that the Calibres demonstrate their full potential when they are placed on nuclear submarines of the Russian Navy. “Considering the speed and ability of Russian nuclear submarines to conceal and move around the world, Moscow can use its submarines with the Caliber onboard to attack targets anywhere in the world, using conventional or “Nuclear warheads,” he fears.

All this means that the United States "no longer owns the monopoly on delivering long-range aimed missile strikes," the publication states. Moreover, the appearance of such weaponsas cruise missiles "Caliber", showed that now objects in the United States "may be under the gun of other great powers."

For Washington, this is a threat that the United States has not encountered since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991,
concludes the author of the publication.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
47 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 210ox
    210ox 22 August 2017 10: 21
    +6
    Of course this is so .. Like theirs "axes" and "tridents" to us.
    1. Angry Russian
      Angry Russian 22 August 2017 10: 22
      +5
      Their "axes" and "tridents" are more dangerous. Due to the number of missiles themselves and the number of their carriers.
      1. Zibelew
        Zibelew 22 August 2017 10: 23
        +5
        Gauges seem to want to install part of the BOD 1155. But not at all. For example, the modernization of Shaposhnikov.
        Dalzavod procurement plan for 2017 (http://zakupki.rosneft.ru/node/220427) .:
        Under the serial number "601-EP" means:
        The name of the program / project * —– PF Executive Plan;
        Procurement justification —- Letter of ONS 753-7-555 from 28.07.2015, order 06326;
        Subject of the contract —– products of UVPU 3С-14-1155;
        Information on the quantity (volume) —- 2;
        The supplier (at ZEP) —- JSC "KBSM", St. Petersburg
        Under serial number "570-EP":
        Name of the program / project * —- ГК 1518187303591040105004735 / Р / 1 / 8 / 0124 / ГК-15-ДГЗ from 01.04.2015;
        Procurement Justification —- Letter 753-7-555 from 28.09.2015;
        Subject of the contract —- Product 3Р-14Н-1155;
        Information on the quantity (volume) —- 1;
        The supplier (at ZEP) —– JSC Concern Morinsis-Agat, Moscow.
        Given the delivery of a set of 2 products 3С-24 and 3Р-60У, the ship will have both Caliber and Uranus.
        1. Angry Russian
          Angry Russian 22 August 2017 10: 25
          +3
          It’s not enough anyway. 8 boards in total 1155 against 64 Arliks ​​11 or more Ticonderoga cruisers. Plus 4 Ohio reprofiled.
          And this version of 1155 was an Agate advertisement. Do not flatter yourself. Inclined UKKS does not exist.
          1. just exp
            just exp 22 August 2017 10: 29
            +2
            so it’s not only the number of sides, but also the number of cells. on one berke there are more of them than on all 1155 combined.
            1. Angry Russian
              Angry Russian 22 August 2017 10: 35
              +2
              I didn’t even mention it. And one “Ohio” in fact carries 168 “axes”. It can be loaded completely.
              24 * 7 = 168
              168 * 4 = 672
              And these are only 4 carriers.
              1. Moore
                Moore 22 August 2017 10: 43
                +2
                Quote: Angry Russian
                I didn’t even mention it. And one “Ohio” in fact carries 168 “axes”. It can be loaded completely.
                24 * 7 = 168
                168 * 4 = 672
                .

                22 * 7 = 154
                154 * 4 = 616
                Converted from 24 x 22 mine.
                1. Angry Russian
                  Angry Russian 22 August 2017 10: 49
                  0
                  And yes, yes. Like two diving?
                  Threat.
                  The counting result is still depressing.
              2. hrych
                hrych 22 August 2017 17: 24
                +6
                Quote: Angry Russian
                Their "axes" and "tridents" are more dangerous. Due to the number of missiles themselves and the number of their carriers.

                Before you panic, you should always compare not quantity, but quality. We will have a thousand of them, but the majority will be nuclear, they will not be used in everyday life (they will drive Bedouins), and in the majority they will take up duty as strategic ones. Including RCC, where the experience of the USSR says that it is better to beat the enemy’s fleet with nuclear devices. They are non-nuclear, although initially they were created as strategic, but because of the depth of the territory of the Russian Federation, they came to the conclusion that they are not very effective, they converted everything into high-precision non-nuclear. Antei, having lost his job after the death of the USSR, namely the pursuit of the AUG in the oceans, as a killer and that now we don’t need at all, will now become a carrier of strategic and naturally nuclear Caliber. And his specialization will be - a blow to stationary targets, including enemy cities, ports, bases, etc. The enemy, unlike us, does not have the depth of the territory, the city in the coastal zone, so the scheme is just right. And Caliber strikes from Varshavyanka and RTOs - EU greetings. Shots with Submarines Caliber - hello USA. From that article is logical.
            2. NEXUS
              NEXUS 22 August 2017 14: 16
              +6
              Quote: just EXPL
              so it’s not only the number of sides, but also the number of cells. on one berke there are more of them than on all 1155 combined.

              True, but for some reason you are silent that these Berks and Tiki are very mediocre protected from the attacks of other ships ... they are imprisoned for work along the shore.
              And if you say that they are covered by the aircraft carrier’s wing, so taking into account how quickly they can lift a large number of boards into the air, it’s not a fact that the aircraft carrier will not go to feed the fish, although it’s practically difficult to do, but it’s possible .
              And for Aegis, if you say, it’s not a fact that this system is really capable of effectively intercepting our anti-ship missiles, which for the most part are super-sound at the finish.
          2. Ivan Ivanov
            Ivan Ivanov 22 August 2017 10: 30
            +10
            The main thing is that it is enough for a one-time destruction of the infrastructure of respected partners in the case "when a fight is inevitable"
            1. Roma 1977
              Roma 1977 22 August 2017 11: 13
              +3
              Exactly. Russia is not going to attack Europe and the United States. What is important is unacceptable retaliatory damage, which can be provided by much smaller forces.
              1. Zaurbek
                Zaurbek 22 August 2017 18: 13
                0
                The possibility of a non-nuclear strike (conventional) throughout Europe is important. With strategic damage.
          3. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 22 August 2017 10: 51
            0
            Quote: Angry Russian
            And this version of 1155 was an Agate advertisement. Do not flatter yourself. Inclined UKKS does not exist.

            EMNIP, at least on one project there are still inclined launchers of "Caliber". But there everything rested on the presence of existing PUs from old KR and the limited height of the hull. wink
        2. Gray brother
          Gray brother 22 August 2017 10: 33
          +1
          Quote: Zibelew
          Gauges seem to want to install part of the BOD 1155.

          I read that still want to stick the RCC there.
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 22 August 2017 10: 48
            0
            Quote: Gray Brother
            I read that still want to stick the RCC there.

            So, “Caliber” is, first of all, a universal PU: both for the “calibers” themselves and for the “Onyxes”.
          2. Angry Russian
            Angry Russian 22 August 2017 10: 51
            +1
            CBBD - 3M14
            CRP - 3M54
            UKKS uniform even for 3М55 и PLUR 91R
            1. Alexey RA
              Alexey RA 22 August 2017 17: 13
              0
              Quote: Angry Russian
              UKKS unified even for 3M55 and PLUR 91R

              Yeah ... an unprecedented thing for the Navy - one PU for several types of missiles. It wouldn’t be as before: each missile has its own type of launcher, and often more than one ... smile
      2. 210ox
        210ox 22 August 2017 10: 26
        +1
        Especially ... A counterweight is needed ..
        1. Solomon Kane
          Solomon Kane 22 August 2017 10: 37
          +5
          For Washington, this is a threat that the United States has not encountered since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991,

          I would say not a threat, but the Arctic fox (beast)!
          1. Xnumx vis
            Xnumx vis 22 August 2017 11: 39
            +1
            And it pleases ! They can get in the face in response, it is very painful and severe.
            1. Logall
              Logall 22 August 2017 12: 07
              +16
              For `` in response in the face '' ours, it seems, the `` Perimeter '' was restored. Caliber for point disarmament. For Armageddon - we always had opportunities!
              1. VadimSt
                VadimSt 22 August 2017 13: 39
                +1
                Quote: Logall
                sort of like, '' Perimeter '' restored

                Officially, the “dead hand” project, according to the classification of the West, has undergone modernization and launched in 2011, in response to the advancement of NATO!
                And the information about the tests in the 2016 year of the torpedo project "Status - 6" should not be forgotten.
      3. DV Coms
        DV Coms 22 August 2017 14: 50
        +2
        Quote: Angry Russian
        Their "axes" and "tridents" are more dangerous. Due to the number of missiles themselves and the number of their carriers.
        The amount is leveled by air defense and missile defense. The US air defense and missile defense are weaker than Russia at times.
        1. Xnumx vis
          Xnumx vis 23 August 2017 10: 07
          0
          And this again pleases us Russians!
  2. Bob 57
    Bob 57 22 August 2017 10: 29
    +3
    We need to build a us base!
    1. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov 22 August 2017 10: 38
      0
      absolutely accurate cartoons. at what point did they stop believing in them?
  3. Vadim Zhivov
    Vadim Zhivov 22 August 2017 10: 30
    +1
    Obvious things are presented as a sensation. They are pumping up as always and no longer know how to show off yet fool
    1. zivXP
      zivXP 22 August 2017 10: 44
      0
      Seeing only now
  4. seregatara1969
    seregatara1969 22 August 2017 10: 33
    +7
    who is stronger - south africa or usa? the United States is afraid of "calibers" and the South African Republic is not afraid! and many countries are not bothered by Russian missiles
  5. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 22 August 2017 10: 35
    +1
    The INF Treaty can be used for its intended purpose. Although all observe and honor him.
    1. SergeBS
      SergeBS 22 August 2017 20: 14
      0
      For some reason, for some reason, it seems to me that some US countries have long left the INF Treaty. For example, not having put into processing its excess nuclear charges under this agreement, with the "excuse": "it was not possible to build a plant." And having stockpiled YaBCh, and the Russian Federation - processed. In the constructed factories.
  6. demo
    demo 22 August 2017 10: 35
    +5
    And the National Interes edition will not be so gracious to announce the list of "other great powers."
    If possible, then without cuts.
    And then I remember one charred guy just hit his chest with his heel the other day and with foam on bluish lips proved that there was only one superpower - the USA.
    And the rest are regional.
    So. We are waiting, sir.

    And then.
    If the country "of the Western world has some kind of weapon that Russia does not have - that's good - this is the key to peace and stability (peace and stability, this weapon brought to Iraq, Libya, Yugoslavia, Syria).
    But if Russia has a similar situation, it is a mortal danger for everyone, and, oh God, for the USA.
    Logic gentlemen. Where is the logic?
    And without calibers, Russia takes out anywhere in the world.
    And even without submarines. There are VKS and Strategic Missile Forces.
    1. Xnumx vis
      Xnumx vis 22 August 2017 11: 41
      +1
      And with calibers and submarines, Russia will get more accurate and more powerful. Let them be.
  7. jovanni
    jovanni 22 August 2017 10: 36
    +1
    For Washington, this is a threat that the United States has not encountered since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991,

    Nobody is to blame you. It was not necessary to become impudent after 1991 ...
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 22 August 2017 11: 23
    +1
    Remember why the third world war did not start at the time of the “Caribbean crisis”? Kennedy asked if the military would guarantee him that not a single nuclear charge would reach US territory. They honestly replied that they did not guarantee. And the US "cut the back." Therefore, it makes no sense to measure nuclear power, who has more. “Unacceptable damage” is a sufficient threat. And "Gauges" - a significant addition to poplars, maces, and more wassat
    1. SergeBS
      SergeBS 22 August 2017 20: 10
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Kennedy asked if the military would guarantee him that not a single nuclear charge would reach US territory. They honestly replied that they did not guarantee.

      Profanation. From Cuba, "vigorous loaf" definitely got the United States. Why, in fact, the "Caribbean crisis" arose. It’s one thing to assume that because of the puddles they’ll get it. And the other thing is to know for sure: they will get it, since nearby, in Cuba, the flight time is not 22 minutes, but 2-5 minutes.
      Accordingly, the question was not about the guarantee that nuclear weapons would not fall into the US goals, but about the guarantee of winning the nuclear war (i.e., surviving). What was not.
      And then the usual trade "we will eliminate it, and you - that."
  9. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 22 August 2017 11: 28
    +8
    Well, what are the supernews in this? Yes they threaten. Moreover, “Gauges” were created for this. And it is very good that they are, and mattresses and hangers-on understand this.
  10. ver_
    ver_ 22 August 2017 12: 21
    0
    Quote: Angry Russian
    Their "axes" and "tridents" are more dangerous. Due to the number of missiles themselves and the number of their carriers.

    .. * the brains of the old man * compare with the brains of a man who * in the juice * is not necessary, as well as physical data (though Carlson did not talk about this) ..
  11. Old military officer
    Old military officer 22 August 2017 12: 34
    +1
    Here are those, fucking in tomato. What news! And the prowlers already scream that they have more. And on health. The main thing we have. And it’s better not to provoke, otherwise the maximum flight range of the Caliber is unknown even under the code name Club-K.
  12. Slovak
    Slovak 22 August 2017 12: 46
    +1
    The authors of the "study" clearly claim the Nobel Prize! Everyone thought Caliber was used, at best, to disperse the clouds.
  13. Topotun
    Topotun 22 August 2017 16: 36
    +1
    And what can get the United States only "Caliber"? In fact, enough other means.
  14. SergeBS
    SergeBS 22 August 2017 20: 27
    0
    All this means that the United States "no longer owns a monopoly on the implementation of long-range targeted missile attacks"

    And that’s all that deserves attention. The "hegemon" of world politics - the United States, suddenly found out: their "bearing democracy in the name of the holy bucks" may be the "answer" ARRIVE. But what about the "sanctity of the bucks"? They will soon refuse it, because it will not be scary: before, the United States killed those who want to go unpunished with impunity, but now they can beat the “great USA” themselves a little. With impunity, the "holy bucks" to retract and debts of the right of the "only strong" to write off - it will not work. Pichalka for the "planetary gopota". crying
  15. zulusuluz
    zulusuluz 23 August 2017 06: 42
    0
    These are the features of the use of strategic offensive arms. And what happens because the US withdraws from the ABM treaty - think. If there is anything else ...
    1. SergeBS
      SergeBS 23 August 2017 21: 15
      0
      These Yankees have long left the treaty. Already in 199X-damned. Now it suddenly turned out - there is no contract, there is no guarantee that we will only fire "in reply".
      The doctrine has changed. It used to be - “touch it - we will answer,” and now - “decide that someone wanted to touch it - IMMEDIATELY”. Preventively.
      In the "official language" it sounds like this: "if there is a real (and not ostentatious, such as a NATO battalion near the border) danger to the integrity of the Russian Federation, then this danger will be eliminated by a nuclear strike." Schaub did not climb, hoping for a "local conflict", etc.
  16. Lena Petrova
    Lena Petrova 23 August 2017 07: 31
    +4
    Quote: seregatara1969
    who is stronger - south africa or usa? the United States is afraid of "calibers" and the South African Republic is not afraid! and many countries are not bothered by Russian missiles

    Especially those where there are no state bases.
  17. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 23 August 2017 14: 29
    0
    And as you like. Ask for - calibrate.