In the troops put the first batch of MLRS "Tornado-S"

22
As the press office PJSC "Motovilikhinskie Zavody", as part of the implementation of the state defense order, shipped the first batch of vehicles from the modern complex of the Tornado-S multiple rocket launcher system to the troops.

As part of the state defense order, the company shipped the first batch of vehicles from the modern TORCADO-S complex to the troops. Unfortunately, in the framework of state secrets, we can not say about the volume of the order, its timing and amount
- noted in the press service



As the Chief of the Missile Forces and Artillery of the Armed Forces of Russia, Lieutenant-General Mikhail Matveyevsky, said earlier, before 2020, the Tornado-S MLRS will replace their predecessors, the Smerch system, as part of the planned re-equipment of the jet artillery brigades.

In the troops put the first batch of MLRS "Tornado-S"


Tornado-S is a modified version of the highly effective MLRS Smerch. The new development corresponds to the main trends of modern warfare. Automation processes implemented in the system allow you to simultaneously control the shooting of the division, as well as automatically calculate target data, direct missiles of combat vehicle guides in the horizontal and vertical planes. This will significantly increase the mobility of the complex and the effectiveness of its combat use.

PJSC "Motovilikhinskiye Zavody" is the developer and the only Russian manufacturer of combat and transport-charging machines from the composition of multiple launch rocket systems such as "Grad", "Smerch" and their modified versions "Tornado-G", "Tornado-S". In 2015, the MLRS Tornado-S passed state tests.
  • http://mz.perm.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    21 August 2017 16: 01
    This is good, but what to do with the chassis feel
    1. +1
      21 August 2017 16: 16
      Have you changed your mind about putting on a KAMAZ chassis with a reduced number of guides?
    2. +1
      21 August 2017 16: 16
      Quote: Siberia 9444
      This is good, but what to do with the chassis feel

      What’s wrong with him?
      1. +5
        21 August 2017 16: 26
        Everything is so, but it’s not ours, you need to load your Bryansk plant hi
        1. +3
          21 August 2017 17: 17
          Quote: Siberia 9444
          your Bryansk plant must be loaded

          Which actually collapsed? And only due to the fact that the enterprise was bought out by Antei, the far-reaching plans of figures from Rostec regarding its closure were not implemented ...
          The irony is that pressure was applied to the Bryansk plant, similar to the pressure on the MZKT. As competitors to the yet undeveloped "Platform" Simply, the Belarusians turned out to be more stable.
          1. +3
            21 August 2017 19: 17
            Thank you for the information, but there is no ordering no enterprise, and people are overboard. At our place, the “NOVOSIBIRSK AVIATION PLANT named after VP CHKALOV” at our country was making motor boats almost bent over in a terrible time, and now the SU34 and modernization SU24m hi
            1. +4
              21 August 2017 19: 39
              Quote: Siberia 9444
              but no ordering no enterprise

              That's just the point, there were orders. But they were given to Kamaz, sometimes even to the detriment of efficiency.
              For example, the “Shell” on the Bryansk chassis could fire cannons in motion.

              But he was put on the Kamaz chassis. And so in the movement only rocket, for the use of guns to stop and push outriggers
            2. +5
              21 August 2017 19: 44
              And also the “Shell” on the KAMAZ chassis is somewhat unstable at bends 8)))
              1. 0
                21 August 2017 19: 49
                Killer kitten, I remembered how the Pioneers fell. But those even in containers, the rockets did not suffer. And here, apparently, a big disaster happens.
                1. +2
                  21 August 2017 20: 30
                  Quote: p-k Oparyshev
                  And here, apparently, a big disaster happens.

                  "Big trouble" looks like this:

                  The main role is again KamAZ. Kazakh "Naiza" at its base.
                  After such a rollover, it is better not to use rockets — there are doubts about the integrity of the rocket engine checkers. And there is one crack, and the burn-out of the engine casing at launch, as a result, a rocket flips right after launch. Only at the factory, disassemble and check.
                  1. +1
                    22 August 2017 05: 02
                    All such "cockroaches" must be done by self-changers, like a dung beetle. It fell on its side, the jacks are rearranged, powered from the remote and the fallen one rises. This should be included in the technical characteristics.
        2. 0
          21 August 2017 20: 52
          Before loading it is necessary to have capacities. But they are not. Actually it is necessary to build a new plant.
          Quote: Siberia 9444
          Everything is so, but it’s not ours, you need to load your Bryansk plant hi
          1. The comment was deleted.
    3. +2
      21 August 2017 20: 31
      Video in the subject, there Tornado-G and Tornado-C is.
  2. 0
    21 August 2017 16: 06
    This is of course very good. But to be honest, I'm interested, our answer to the Chinese is being prepared, i.e. Are new developments underway?
  3. +2
    21 August 2017 16: 42
    Interestingly, the cost of the volley could be reduced in comparison with the "Tornado"?
  4. +1
    21 August 2017 16: 48
    The uniform arms race in the field of tactical missiles has begun:
    then Tornado, then HIMARS. How to break the chain ...
    Now, when they started to put GOS on them, they need fewer in number.
    Less ammunition required. So everyone was happy
    1. +5
      21 August 2017 17: 33
      Well Tornado-s is essentially a modernization of tornadoes. I'm interested in something else. There was talk of Tornado-u as a replacement for Hurricanes. But then they calmed down. Which, incidentally, is logical. To be honest, I don’t really understand much of the need to have Hurricane and Tornado at the same time, except for the need to put somewhere 220mm of ammunition in warehouses. But apparently there is already a bicoliber Hurricane-1m for this. PM ordinary Hurricanes become unnecessary. It is quite enough to have two calibers of the rzzo -122 and 300 mm. The need for a third - 220 mm to put it mildly, is not obvious.
      1. +2
        21 August 2017 19: 30
        The missiles of 220 mm to the hurricane in range are already rather weak, besides, they hit 60 km with the Chinese, and here only up to 35.
      2. +2
        21 August 2017 20: 16
        You are actually repeating Serdyukov’s mistake, which threw us far in the field of MLRS. So that even the Chinese have overtaken us.
        Only with him went further - one MLRS installation, multi-caliber, from 122 to 300 ..

        But then someone suddenly remembered subordination ...
        For a brigade jet division, a machine capable of firing 300 mm missiles is redundant. For a front-line reactive brigade or RGC, 120-mm missiles have insufficient range.
        Well, for the reactive units of the army submission, just the same 220 mm is the thing. And the range is sufficient, and the volley price is not prohibitive, like a 300 mm

        We would have another 107 mm (China) or 140 mm (USSR) to have a turbojet. To shoot at short ranges when the use of "Grad" even with brake rings is impractical due to the high dispersion in range. And then the “Pinocchio” / “Sunshine” missiles. Well and for the Airborne Forces, air assault and other mountain missiles, such light installations are a more appropriate solution.
        1. +1
          21 August 2017 20: 34
          Quote: Spade
          And then the Pinocchio / Sunshine missiles

          ... too expensive
        2. 0
          23 August 2017 13: 08
          War is always logistics plus economics. Everything else is secondary. The extra rzzo caliber is the need for the constant supply of a separate type of ammunition. And if you take into account the entire range of ammunition for the RSZO, then this is additional storage capacity, additional logistics, and so on. Not to mention the production of machinery itself. In my opinion, it is much more profitable for the brigade division to issue tornadoes or tornadoes. Due to more mass production, the cost of production of the North-West Federal District and the production of ammunition will be cheaper. Logistics will be simplified and supply will become more efficient. good
          Well, to be honest, I don’t really understand why 300 mm is excessive for the brigade division. request In the end, there are not so many that it was impossible to transplant them into tornadoes.
          In general, in my opinion, in such things it is worth paying attention to a likely opponent. He tries to unify equipment and weapons as much as possible, as well as reduce the cost of its production and ensure mass production. In my opinion, not the most stupid way. hi
          1. 0
            23 August 2017 17: 40
            Quote: g1v2
            The extra rzzo caliber is the need for the constant supply of a separate type of ammunition. And if you take into account the entire range of ammunition for the RSZO

            And if you consider that the cost of a full salvo of the Smerchi division is 288.7 million rubles in 2005 prices, and the price of a full salvo of the Hurricanes division is 42,2 million rubles?
    2. +2
      21 August 2017 20: 30
      Tornado-S has been ready to supply for several years now, I don’t understand what prevented this from happening before.
  5. +2
    22 August 2017 04: 28
    the main advantage of the caliber is 122mm, the ability to disguise as a regular truck and the possibility of manual loading, with a caliber of 300mm it does not

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"