60 years ago, the first successful launch of the Soviet intercontinental ballistic missile P-7 took place

24
21 August 1957, exactly 60 years ago, the world's first intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), the P-7, was successfully launched from the Baikonur space center. This Soviet missile was the first intercontinental ballistic missile that passed successful tests and delivered a warhead to an intercontinental range. The P-7, which was also called the "seven" (GRAU index - 8K71), was a two-stage ICBM with a detachable 3 ton head and a 8 range of thousands of kilometers.

Later, from 20 on January 1960 to the end of 1968, the modification of this rocket under the designation Р-7А (GRAU index - 8К74) with the range increased to 9,5 thousand kilometers was in service with the Strategic Missile Forces of the USSR. In NATO countries, this rocket became known as the SS-6 Sapwood. This Soviet rocket was not only formidable. weaponsbut also a major milestone in the domestic cosmonautics, becoming the basis for creating launch vehicles designed to bring spacecraft and spacecraft, including manned spacecraft, into space. The contribution of this rocket to space exploration is enormous: many artificial Earth satellites were launched into the launch vehicles of the P-7 family, starting with the very first, and also the first manned space flight.



History create rocket P-7

The history of the creation of the P-7 ICBM began long before its first launch took place - at the end of the 1940-s of the early 1950-s. During this period, as a result of the development of single-stage ballistic missiles P-1, P-2, P-3 and P-5, which were led by prominent Soviet designer Sergey Pavlovich Korolev, in the future, to achieve the potential enemy’s territory, a much more powerful component will be needed a multi-stage rocket, the idea of ​​which was previously voiced by the famous Russian theorist of cosmonautics Konstantin Tsiolkovsky.

60 years ago, the first successful launch of the Soviet intercontinental ballistic missile P-7 took place

Back in 1947, Mikhail Tikhonravov organized a separate group at the Research Institute of Artillery Sciences, which began to carry out systematic research on the possibility of developing composite (multi-stage) ballistic missiles. After studying the results that were obtained by this group, Korolev decided to carry out a preliminary design of a powerful multi-stage rocket. Preliminary surveys on the development of ICBMs began in 1950: 4 December 1950, the USSR Council of Ministers decreed a comprehensive search R & D on the study of the prospects for creating different types of thrusters with a range of 5-10 thousand kilometers and a mass of warhead from 1 to 10 tons . And on May 20, 1954, another government resolution was issued, which officially set the task for the OKB-1 to develop a ballistic missile that could carry a thermonuclear charge at intercontinental range.

New powerful engines for the P-7 rocket were created in parallel in the OKB-456, the work was led by Valentin Glushko. The control system for the rocket was designed by Nikolai Pilyugin and Boris Petrov, the launch complex was Vladimir Barmin. A number of other organizations were involved in the work. At the same time, the country raised the question of building a new test site designed for testing intercontinental ballistic missiles. In February, the 1955 of the year issued another decree of the Government of the USSR on the beginning of the construction of the landfill, which was given the name 5-rd Research and Test Site of the Ministry of Defense (NIIP-5). It was decided to build a landfill in the area of ​​the village of Baikonur and the Tyura-Tam (Kazakhstan) crossing, later it went down in history and is known to this day precisely as Baikonur. The spaceport was built as a highly secret object, the launch complex for the new P-7 missiles was ready in April 1957.

The design of the P-7 rocket was completed in July of the 1954 of the year, and already on 20 in November of the same year, the construction of the rocket was officially approved by the USSR Council of Ministers. By the beginning of 1957, the first Soviet intercontinental ballistic missile was ready for testing. Since the middle of May 1957, the first series of tests of the new rocket has been carried out; it has demonstrated that there are serious flaws in its design. 15 May 1957, the first launch of the P-7 ICBM was performed. According to visual observations, the rocket flight proceeded normally, but then changes in the flames of exhaust gases from the engines became noticeable in the tail section. Later, after telemetry processing, it was found that a fire had occurred in one of the side blocks. After 98 seconds of controlled flight due to the loss of thrust, this unit was separated, followed by the command to turn off the rocket engines. The cause of the accident was called the leakage of the fuel line of fuel.


The next launch, which was scheduled for 11 June 1957, did not take place due to a malfunction of the engines of the central unit. Several attempts to start the engines of the rocket did not lead to anything, after which the automation issued a command for emergency shutdown. The test leadership decided to drain the fuel and remove the P-7 MBR from the launch position. 12 July 1957, the P-7 rocket managed to take off, but at the 33 second flight the stability was lost, the rocket began to deviate from the given flight trajectory. This time, the cause of the accident was the closure of the integrating device control signal circuits on the body via the rotation and pitch channels.

Only the fourth launch of the rocket, which took place on 21 in August of 1957, was recognized as successful, the rocket was able to reach the target area for the first time. The rocket launched from Baikonur, completed the active part of the trajectory, after which the head of the rocket hit the given square of the Kamchatka Peninsula (Kura missile test site). But even in this fourth launch, not everything was smooth. The main disadvantage of the launch was the destruction of the head of the rocket in the dense layers of the atmosphere on the downward portion of its trajectory. The telemetry connection with the rocket was lost 15-20 seconds before the estimated time to reach the earth's surface. The analysis of the fallen elements of the head of the P-7 rocket made it possible to establish that the destruction began at the tip of the warhead, and at the same time clarify the ablation values ​​of its heat-shielding coating. The obtained information allowed to finalize the documentation on the head of the rocket, to clarify the strength and design calculations, layout, as well as to make a new rocket as soon as possible for the next launch. At the same time, 27 August, 1957, appeared in the Soviet press news on the successful testing in the Soviet Union of an ultra-long multistage rocket.

The positive results of the flight of the first Soviet ICBM P-7 in the active part of the trajectory made it possible to use this rocket to launch the first in the history of mankind artificial satellites 4 of October and 3 of November of the same year. Originally created as a combat missile, the P-7 possessed the necessary energy capabilities, which allowed it to launch a large mass of payload into space (into Earth orbit), which was clearly demonstrated by the launch of the first Soviet satellites.


According to the results of the X-test of the P-6 ICBM test launches, its head part was substantially refined (in fact, replaced by a new one), the head-end separation system was subjected to refinement, and slot antennas of the telemetry system were used. 7 March 29 for the first time was launched, which was successful in full (the head of the rocket reached the goal without destruction). At the same time during the 1958 and 1958 years continued flight tests of the rocket, the results of which in its design made all the new improvements. As a result, the resolution of the Council of Ministers of the USSR and the Central Committee of the CPSU No. 1959-192 of January 20 20, the P-1960 rocket was officially adopted.

The design of the rocket R-7

The intercontinental ballistic missile Р-7, created in OKB-1 under the supervision of chief designer Sergey Pavlovich Korolev (main designer Sergey Sergeevich Kryukov), was built according to the so-called “packet” scheme. The first stage of the rocket consisted of 4-x side blocks, each of which had a length of 19 meters and the largest diameter 3 meter. The side blocks were located symmetrically around the central unit (the second stage of the rocket) and connected to it by the lower and upper belts of the force connections. The design of the rocket blocks was the same. Each of them consisted of a support cone, a power ring, fuel tanks, a tail section, and a propulsion system. All the blocks were installed LRE RD-107 with a system of pumping fuel components. This engine was built in an open pattern and included 6 combustion chambers. In this case, two cameras were used as steering. The RD-107 rocket engine developed thrust near the Earth’s surface in 82 tons.

The second stage of the rocket (central unit) included the instrument compartment, the fuel and oxidizer tank, the power ring, the tail compartment, the cruise engine, and the 4 steering gear. At the second stage, the LPD-108 was placed, which by design was similar to the RD-107, but was distinguished by a large number of steering chambers. This engine developed ground thrust 75 tons. It was switched on simultaneously with the engines of the first stage (even at the time of launch) and worked accordingly longer than the first stage LRE. The launch of all the available engines of the first and second stages right at the start was carried out for the reason that at that time the rocket creators had no confidence in the possibility of reliable ignition of the second stage engines at high altitude. A similar problem then faced the American designers who worked on their Atlas ICBM.

RRE-107 engine in the Memorial Museum of Cosmonautics in Moscow

All engines of the first Soviet ICBM P-7 used a two-component fuel: fuel - kerosene T-1, oxidizer - liquid oxygen. The hot gas generated in the gas generator during the catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide was used to drive the turbopump assemblies of rocket engines, and compressed nitrogen was used to pressurize the tanks. To ensure the specified range of the missile’s flight, an automatic system for controlling engine operating modes was placed on it, as well as a synchronized tank emptying system (CSR), which made it possible to reduce the guaranteed fuel reserve. The structural layout of the P-7 rocket ensured the launch of all its engines at the time of launch with the help of special igniting devices, they were placed in each of the 32 combustion chambers. Marching LRE of this rocket for its time stood out for very high energy and mass characteristics, as well as favorably distinguished by their high degree of reliability.

The intercontinental ballistic missile control system P-7 was combined. The autonomous subsystem was responsible for providing angular stabilization and stabilization of the center of mass while the rocket was on the active part of the trajectory. And the radio-technical subsystem was responsible for correcting the lateral movement of the center of mass at the final stage of the active part of the trajectory and issuing a command to turn off the engines. The executive bodies of the missile control system were air rudders and steering cameras of steering engines.

The value of the rocket P-7 in the conquest of space

The P-7, which many people called simply “the seven,” became the progenitor of a whole family of Soviet and Russian-made launch vehicles. They were created on the basis of the ICBM P-7 in the course of a deep and multi-stage process of modernization. Starting from the 1958 year and to the present, all missiles of the P-7 family are made by TsSKB-Progress (Samara).

P-7 carrier rockets

The success and, as a consequence, the high reliability of the rocket design, together with a sufficiently large power for the ICBM, made it possible to use it as a launch vehicle. Already during the operation of the P-7 in this capacity, some shortcomings were identified, the process of its gradual modernization took place to increase the mass of the payload put into orbit, reliability, as well as expansion of the range of tasks solved by the rocket. The launch vehicles of this family truly opened up the space age to all mankind, with their help, among other things, the following were realized:

- launch of the first artificial satellite into Earth orbit;
- launch of the first satellite with a living creature on board (the astronaut Laika dog) into Earth orbit;
- launch of the first spacecraft with a man on board to the earth orbit (flight of Yuri Gagarin).

The reliability of the P-7 rocket created by Korolyov made it possible to develop on its basis a whole family of launch vehicles: Vostok, Voskhod, Molniya, Soyuz, Soyuz-2 and their various modifications. At the same time, the newest of them are actively used in our days. The P-7 family of rockets has become the most popular in the history, the number of their launches is already about 2000, they are also recognized as one of the most reliable in the world. To date, all manned launches of the Soviet Union and Russia have been carried out with the help of launch vehicles of this family. Currently, Roskosmos and the Space Forces are actively using the Soyuz-FG and Soyuz-2 missiles of this family.

Duplicate copy of the Gagarin "East-1". Exhibited on the territory of the Museum of Cosmonautics in Kaluga


Information sources:
https://ria.ru/spravka/20120821/727374310.html
http://www.soyuz.by/news/expert/34128.html
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/r-7/r-7.shtml
Open source materials
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    21 August 2017 06: 23
    Dear colleagues, tell me: no one is shocked by the fact that for 60 (!!) years nothing fundamentally new has been invented in terms of space exploration?
    What is 60 years in the era of scientific and technical progress?
    For example:
    - a path from the first underwater vehicles to the nuclear submarines;
    -from steam engines to nuclear power plants;
    -from the trench bomb to the ATGM.
    And here, as if some kind of veto was imposed ... IMHO, of course.
    1. +5
      21 August 2017 09: 23
      in the aircraft industry the same thing, Boeing 737 and 747 appeared in the 60s, and still fly, they are certainly improved, but nothing more progressive was proposed, 50 years have passed, and if you count at least 60 years from the 40s, for example in the 20s, and compare aircraft of the 20s and 60s, then the contrast will turn out not comparable
      1. +3
        21 August 2017 09: 29
        Quote: San Sanych
        Compare aircraft of the 20s and 60s,

        even compare the plywood biplanes of the early 30s and the reactive late 40s
      2. 0
        13 September 2017 09: 49
        But for example a bicycle based on muscle strength, is it possible to fundamentally improve a bicycle?
        As a bicycle, do not improve it fundamentally, both from titanium and from nano, and a motorcycle surpasses a bicycle in range and speed. It is not necessary to improve, but to switch to a new technology based on new physical principles of work.
        There is a good book on the topic - S. Lem. "sum of technology"
    2. +2
      21 August 2017 09: 27
      Quote: Moore
      No one is shocked by the fact that for 60 (!!) years nothing fundamentally new has been invented in terms of space exploration?

      at first glance, yes. But from a different angle, the space industry is solving its tasks - there is communication and navigation, intelligence works vigilantly. And the heroics of space exploration quietly went into oblivion ..
    3. +7
      21 August 2017 10: 00
      Quote: Moore
      What is xnumx years


      The State Commission for Testing the R-7 rocket and the first satellite, as well as test managers.
      Site 10 of the Turatam training ground, autumn 1957
      Sitting from left to right: G.R. Udarov, A.I. Semenov, A.G. Mrykin, M.V. Keldysh, S.P. Korolev, V.M. Ryabikov, M.I. Nedelin, G.N. Pashkov, M.S. Ryazansky, K.N. Rudnev, V.P. Glushko, V.P. Barmin, V.I. Kuznetsov;
      stand: P.E. Trubachev, G.A. Tyulin, N.N. Smirnitsky, N.A. Pilyugin, A.A. Vasiliev, V.I. Ilyushenko, A.I. Nosov, A.F. Bogomolov, K.D. Bushuev, V.I. Kurbatov, K.V. Gerchik.

      All Legends!

      But there was still a large photograph with most of the participants of the First launch of the P-7.
      I saw him in Podlipki in the engine compartment of Borzdyko Victor Georgievich.
    4. +5
      21 August 2017 10: 30
      Nothing fundamentally new has been invented, because physics does not offer anything fundamentally new, which can serve as the foundation for fundamentally new technologies.
      Incidentally, this is a fundamental question - it seems to me that modern science has rested in a kind of ceiling, and astronautics is the most obvious example of the current perception of the structure of the universe. A fundamental breakthrough is needed to move to a new level of development.
      1. +1
        21 August 2017 13: 50
        not science “rested” on the “ceiling”, but someone or “something” dictates “fashion”, or as they call it now, it’s a trend (notorious, I don’t like these new-fangled words)
      2. +3
        21 August 2017 16: 16
        "By the way, this is a fundamental question - as it seems to me, modern science has rested in a kind of ceiling" ///

        No. Science is developing at a frantic pace, incomparable with the 19th or 20th centuries.
        But she went into the micro-world: organic chemistry-electronics-biotechnology-diagnostics-pharmac
        ology-quantum physics.
        And the micro-nano-world is much more important than the huge mechanical structures. Indeed, we ourselves are composed of neuron molecules. There was a unique opportunity to change ourselves.
        1. 0
          21 August 2017 22: 46
          Yes, the pace of development is impressive. But the foundations of all these directions were laid no later than the 50s of the last century. And the rest of the situation resembles the second half of the 19th century, when they considered that everything was already open and it was not worth doing science because it was futile. The jerk occurred by and large unexpectedly. Something similar is needed now, only if the world has enough resources for a new breakthrough ...
    5. 0
      21 August 2017 11: 51
      Quote: Moore
      What is 60 years in the era of scientific and technical progress?
      For example:
      - a path from the first underwater vehicles to the nuclear submarines;
      -from steam engines to nuclear power plants;
      -from the trench bomb to the ATGM.
      And here, as if some kind of veto was imposed ... IMHO, of course.

      I am afraid that there is no progress due to the lack of challenging tasks. Alas, space is not burdened with minerals, at least such extraction of which would be economically viable. The tasks of reconnaissance, communications, weather forecasting using existing systems are being addressed. The only task facing designers now is to reduce the cost of putting goods into orbit. But here a well-developed system that does not need to be spent on R&D, which has the least technical risks, turns out to be very competitive. There are, of course, attempts to squeeze alliances. This and the now deceased, American shuttle, and Herr Ilon with his program of returning the first stage and a number of other attempts to develop the space program .... But, alas, it is either not in demand or economically unsolvable or technically difficult.
      So Soyuz-2 flies, periodically upgrading and improving, becoming cheaper and more reliable.
      P.S. Personal IMHO: at the moment there is a conversion of quantity into quality. A search is underway for a new breakthrough launch vehicle architecture. And, it seems to me that the future does not belong to reusable systems.
    6. 0
      21 August 2017 14: 29
      Designed by Werner von Braun, by the way.
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. +3
      21 August 2017 15: 05
      Quote: Moore
      Dear colleagues, tell me: nobody is shocked by the fact that for 60 (!!) years nothing fundamentally new has been invented in terms of space exploration

      And what should be new? Everything that is possible is squeezed out of engines and chemical fuel. We need new ideas, fundamentally different engines, new fuels.
      Oxidizing agent Fuel Average density
      fuel [6], g / cm³ Chamber temperature
      combustion, K Hollow specific
      impulse, s
      Oxygen Hydrogen 0,3155 3250 428
      Kerosene 1,036 3755 335
      Asymmetric dimethylhydrazine 0,9915 3670 344
      Hydrazine 1,0715 3446 346
      Ammonia 0,8393 3070 323
      Diazot tetraoxide Kerosene 1,269 3516 309
      Asymmetric dimethylhydrazine 1,185 3469 318
      Hydrazine 1,228 3287 322
      Fluoride Hydrogen 0,621 4707 449
      Hydrazine 1,314 4775 402
      Pentaborane 1,199 4807 361
      1. +1
        22 August 2017 04: 12
        Quote: Amurets

        And what should be new? Everything that is possible is squeezed out of engines and chemical fuel.

        You yourself answered your own question. There are no developments of fundamentally new engines, no, as dear tchoni
        challenging tasks.
        Mankind has gone a little into the microworld, as dear voyaka uhhow much along the way of creating talking toilets and advanced gadgets for fun.
        How can one not recall the creation of N. Nosov "Dunno on the Moon" - essentially a textbook for children on the basics of capitalism:
        “Lunar rich people are not interested in stars,” said Alpha. - The rich, like pigs, do not like to raise their heads to look up. They are only interested in money !.
        1. 0
          22 August 2017 11: 36
          "Humanity has gone a little into the microworld," ///

          1) Microcosm gives impetus to the creation of new materials.
          The metallurgy of alloys has completely exhausted itself in 1000 years.
          And new materials will allow access to space on a new "material base".

          2) And the microworld gave an incredible impetus to information technology.
          All the information of all the libraries of the world can be fit into the subject today,
          the size of a box of matches. And this is also directly related to space.
          Without reliable video communications, without the exchange of information, space exploration is useless.
          Here, the Mars rover has been creeping on Mars for 14 (!) Years and is transmitting a video image.
          The Chinese carried out a satellite quantum communication session last month.
          Much cooler!
    9. +1
      22 August 2017 15: 35
      Quote: Moore
      Dear colleagues, tell me: no one is shocked by the fact that for 60 (!!) years nothing fundamentally new has been invented in terms of space exploration?


      Well this is an idle opinion.
      For example, a talented graduate of our faculty, proposed a device that increases the efficiency of the nozzle forming unit, that is, increases the efficiency of the rocket engine.
      Built and tested prototype.
      He would have to open financing, but the funds hardly reach the generators of ideas or do not reach at all ...
    10. 0
      22 August 2017 17: 40
      Quote: Moore
      And here, as if some kind of veto was imposed ... IMHO, of course.

      why so-so breakthrough has become very expensive, and society consumption usually requires a lot and is affordable.
      Humanity is balancing between need and necessity. Now is the golden era of consumption. For consolidation and jerking, you need the tension of society ... without external enemies without competition systems, where to get a lot of money for this?
    11. 0
      13 September 2017 09: 33
      Mankind is too arrogant and overestimates its capabilities, during the development of guns, they planned to send a man to the moon with a gun, without jokes. When they set new records for the speed of steam locomotives, the audience was enthusiastic about progress and dreamed of conquering the moon on a steam locomotive.
      The entire scientific and technological revolution, in fact, developed the combustion technology, which reached its peak of development, the next technology is a thermonuclear reactor, but it is still in the experimental stage.
    12. 0
      13 September 2017 10: 21
      In fact, for now, it’s better to master space with the help of automatic devices, which, by the way, is done in the west. They, without rushing, methodically launch, from primitive to more complex, different devices. Now NASSA, while they have CryoCity traveling on Mars, is developing the following model of the rover, not counting space and ground-based telescopes, but how many active rovers are from the Russian Federation?
      1. 0
        13 September 2017 10: 24
        The Russian Federation does not have radiation resistant microelectronics for space, apparently this is the problem that comic devices cannot do. The same, the satellite "phobos-soil", immediately bumped.
  2. 0
    21 August 2017 13: 56
    Well, really, we have to consider a combat missile only from April 58. And before that, only as a satellite carrier. But the new one was Buran’s flight. One.
  3. 0
    22 August 2017 15: 27
    Another copywriting of long-published materials.
    The control system of the R-7 intercontinental ballistic missile was combined.

    Yes, it was just an ass! Radio correction of the trajectory, complex stations issuing control signals - useless accuracy.

    "... To implement the radio correction algorithms, two control points were built (main and mirror), located 276 km from the starting position and 552 km from each other (!!!) Measurement of the P-7 motion parameters and transmission of missile control commands were carried out a pulse multi-channel communication line operating in the 3-cm wavelength range with encoded signals. A special calculating and resolving device, located at the main point, made it possible to perform control over the flight range, it gave the command to turn off the engine the second steps, when reaching a given speed and coordinates ... "- Archaic correction system, complex and unreliable.
    1. 0
      13 September 2017 09: 37
      This is from the age of processors, it’s easy to speak archaic, but for that time it was modern and cool.
  4. 0
    22 August 2017 17: 41
    Korolev, Glushko and others ... geniuses of his time.