Class war armored vehicles


The armored vehicle of the American army M1126 Stryker entered service with the 12,7-mm machine gun, while the presence of a weapon module means that the shooter remains protected by armor

They say that cars, like people, gain weight with age. Definitely this applies to light armored vehicles. Last but not least, the increased firepower of the latest models of “light” combat vehicles contributes to this.

Platforms, declaratively received from the military media and manufacturers, the designation Light Armored Vehicles (LME; in Western terminology - Light Armored Vehicle) have a relatively large mass. For example, according to available data, the Boxer armored vehicle manufactured by Krauss-Mafei Wegmann and Rheinmetall weighs 36500 kg at full combat load, while the modular armored vehicle Armored Modular Vehicle (AMV) of the Finnish company Patria weighs 27 000 kg at full load. Even the previously deployed LMBs went through upgrades, as a result of which their combat mass increased. For example, the family of all-wheel drive armored vehicles LAV-III manufactured by General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS) of the Canadian Army has a combat weight of about 17000 kg. In this regard, it is worth asking the question: what are the characteristics of modern LME? A review of some current programs on “lighter” armored vehicles gives some insight into what the current state of affairs is and what we could expect in the near future. The focus of the article is also on the development of weapons systems and enhancing the fire power of "light" armored combat vehicles.

Increase firepower

For the most part, LMEs have always been associated with “light” weapons. Typical weapons were heavy machine guns, but of course there were exceptions. For example, the Spahpanzer Luchs 8x8 reconnaissance vehicle from Daimler-Benz was armed with an 20-mm automatic cannon from Rheinmetall Mk.20 Rh.202. In turn, the United States Marine Corps did not follow the trend of installing large-caliber machine guns on armored combat vehicles (BBM) and installed an All-Techsystems / Orbital ATK M-25 Bushmaster automatic cannon on their LAV-25 machines. Several more platforms followed this path, including an Iveco / Leonardo Freccia armored vehicle with an Oerlikon / Rheinmetall KBA 242-mm automatic cannon. However, the choice of the US Army in the 25 for its M2002 Stryker armored personnel carrier, the Remotely Controlled Weapons Module (DUMV) Protector from the Norwegian Kongsberg armed with the 1126-mm M12,7 Browning machine gun, showed that calibers such as 2 mm are generally considered completely suitable.

US infantry chose the M-25 Bushmaster’s automatic cannon for their LAV-242 armored vehicles, which greatly enhanced their firepower.

Sryker us army

Despite the choice of the combination “Protector-machine gun М2”, the acceleration of the American Army 2016 program to increase the firepower of the M1126 armored vehicles of the 2 reconnaissance regiment based in Germany is evidence of a trend to increase firepower, which is very difficult to achieve within the design parameters of the existing platforms. A GDLS spokesperson said the selection process was determined by the mandatory requirements of the American army. First of all, this is a larger stock of the car’s running and the eight-person maintenance of its amphibious capacity. Uninhabited tower MCT-30 Medium-Caliber Remote Weapons Station (MCRWS) from Kongsberg was chosen to replace the existing combination of combat module Protector and machine gun М2. The installation of the 30-mm automatic gun Mk.44 Bushmaster-II compared with the previous solution provides a significant increase in armor penetration, since its ammunition includes an armor-piercing feathered projectile.

However, the same great advantages may well provide the capabilities of the Mk.44 Bushmaster-II universal programmable projectile projectile. According to Orbital ATK, General Dynamics / Orbital ATK's semi-armored high-explosive incendiary projectile PGU-32U operates in three modes: Point Detonation (PD) point detonation, PD Delay and Delayed Detonation. PD mode (percussion fuse) is typical of most projectiles. PD-Delay allows the projectile to penetrate light armor, cover, or wall before undermining. An air blast occurs above or in front of the target, causing a cloud of fragmentation elements to disperse. This mode is well suited to combat manpower, serviced by calculations of weapons and targets behind shelters. The shooter selects the mode of the fuse before firing and the projectile is automatically programmed when the projectile is sent to the chamber. MCT-30 has the advantage, because the crew access to the tower is through the hatch, which allows reloading the ammunition and servicing the gun without leaving the car. According to various sources, the army plans to equip the MCN-30 turret from 61 to 81 with an MXX armored vehicle. According to open sources, the first arrivals of the upgraded platform are expected by the middle of 1126.

The Polish armored vehicle Rosomak, manufactured under license from the Finnish Patna, is equipped with a Hitfist-30P turret with an 30-mm KVA automatic cannon. The machine has been successfully operated in Afghanistan, as evidenced by many positive reviews


Relatively heavy weapons are machines from the AMV family developed by the Finnish company Patria. These machines have achieved clear success, since since their debut in the configuration of an armored personnel carrier in the Finnish army in 2003, they have been chosen by seven armies. Licensed production in Poland of BTR and BMP configurations began in 2004; in this country, the whole family received the general designation CTO Rosomak. The BMP version is equipped with the Hitfist-30Р tower from Melara / Leonardo GR, which is armed with the Mk.44 Bushmaster-II automatic cannon. At the Eurosatory 2016 exhibition in Paris, the Iveco / Leonardo consortium, which produces the Freccia armored vehicles, presented an option for the Italian army, equipped with a Hitfist-Plus turret, equipped with an KVA automatic cannon and optical-guided ground-to-surface missile launchers developed by an Israeli company Rafael Advanced Defense Systems. The Italian government ordered the Freccia armored vehicles in the 2006 year.


The Dutch army exploits the Boxer family of armored vehicles (see above). This modular concept uses a common chassis, on which, depending on the tasks facing the army, various functional modules are installed. The Dutch deployed Boxer 200 machines in various versions, the last of which entered the army in the 2015 year. The German army is also armed with these machines, but neither the Dutch nor the German Boxer are armed, except for the DUMV Protector. At Eurosatory 2014, Rheinmetall showed the Boxer version, equipped with a Lance tower armed with Bushmaster-III 35 guns. In December 2015, the Lithuanian government chose a Boxer machine, equipped with a Rafael Samson Mk.2 DUMV with an 30-mm cannon and Spike-LR missile launchers. According to open sources, in accordance with the contract worth 440,7 million dollars, the first deliveries of these machines are expected by the end of 2017, and their completion in 2019.

The Boxer 8x8 armored vehicle with the Samson Tower was chosen by Lithuania. This is the first deployment of a Boxer with a larger caliber

More is better?

Dan Lindell, lead engineer for the CV-90 tracked armored vehicle at BAE Systems, said: “The customer, the Swedish army, believes that the 40 mm caliber has advantages related to size, greater explosive power, increased range and projectile versatility, including programmable fuses ". According to the manufacturer, the Swedish CV-90 armored vehicle (local designation Strf-9040) can carry 24 40-mm projectiles in the store, 32 projectiles and 232 projectiles in the installation. With the same 30-mm gun installed, 160 ready shots and 400 shells are placed in the machine in the machine.

Indeed, 40-mm automatic cannons can in principle be suitable for other customers. The CTAS 40-mm automatic cannon is a joint venture between BAE Systems and Nexter, which in this project merged into the CTA International consortium. The CTAS 40 system uses telescopic ammunition. The projectile itself is recessed into the sleeve with the propellant, which makes it possible to obtain a shorter projectile, and this makes it possible to place more of them in the machine. Secondly, the unique design of the rotating breech is implemented in the gun, allowing it to be installed on lighter machines and smaller towers. As explained by the CTA project manager: “Everything together allows us to minimize the volume required in the tower and reduces the total mass. This makes it possible to get a more compact combat module while maintaining the power and effectiveness of an 40-mm caliber. "

As noted by the company, the tracer armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber projectile (BOPS) of the CTAS 40 cannon system can penetrate armor steel with a thickness of more than 140 mm from a distance of 1,5 km. Universal projectile with a head fuse and a tracer is designed for punching walls and light armor, which increases the supergrate impact of fragmentation. Meanwhile, the high-explosive fragmentation projectile with the GPR-AB-T tracer detonates in accordance with the selected delay time at a maximum range of 2,5 km. And finally, the anti-Aerial Airburst projectile is particularly effective against unmanned aerial vehicles, helicopters and low-speed aircraft.

In 2016, Norway began replacing its CV-90 machines with a new version of the CV-9035N - an improved model with a DUMV Protector with higher levels of protection and better situational awareness

Towards CTAS 40, towers were developed for two more cars. Nexter’s Jaguar 6x6 reconnaissance vehicle, which will replace GIAT / Nexter’s AMX-10RC reconnaissance vehicles and ERC-90 Sagaie Panhard / Nexter armored vehicles, will be installed around the CTAS 40 cannon. Deliveries of the first Jaguar machines are expected by 2020, with a total planned quantity of 248 units. Another vehicle that will be armed with a CTAS 40 gun will be the British Army's FV-510 / 511 Warrior BMP. Installation of the gun will be carried out in accordance with the modernization conducted by Lockheed Martin as part of the WCSP program (Warrior Capability Sustainment Program - extension of the capabilities of the Warrior BMP). According to the leading manufacturer BAE Systems, the goal of this program, which began in 2011, is to extend the life of the machines to 2040 of the year. In addition to installing on existing FV-510 / 511 machines, the CTAS 40 cannon is being installed on new GDELS Ajax tracked vehicles, which, according to the British Department of Defense, should start shipping in the 2017 year. In the spring of 2016, the first Ajax prototypes were presented, after which the advanced tests began. The Defense Ministry is talking about supplying up to 245 Ajax machines with the CTAS 40 weapon system.

The CTA International consortium developed the CTAS 40 gun with shorter telescopic ammunition. The gun also used a unique rotating breech, which reduces the volume required for its installation

At the other end of the world

The goal of the Australian Land-400 program, according to the local Department of Defense, is to replace the fleet of armored vehicles of the Australian army. It includes a component that will provide the army with "new melee capabilities." A year ago, the Ministry of Defense announced that it had selected two candidates who would participate in the program’s risk reduction phase; these are BAE Systems and Rheinmetall, offering their BBM AMV-35 and Boxer. The Boxer is available with a Rheinmetall Lance turret with an 30-mm automatic cannon, and BAE Systems offers a turret with an 30-mm Mk.44 Bushmaster II automatic cannon. As part of the fourth phase of the Land-400 program, new infantry fighting vehicles will be purchased to replace the tracked BTR M-113AS3 / 4 of the Australian army. The Ministry of Defense has yet to announce when the Land-400 initiative will start, the possible value of the contract and how many vehicles will be purchased. Potential candidates for this program are Puma tracked infantry fighting vehicles — the fruit of the efforts of Krauss-Mafei Wegmann and Rheinmetall — possibly also equipped with the already mentioned Lance turret, CV-9035 armored vehicle with a Mk.44 Bushmaster II gun, which can be offered ASCOD-2. either with the CTAS 40 cannon, or the Mk.44 Bushmaster-II, and finally the Lynx armored vehicle from Rheinmetall, again with the Lance turret. This whole set of platforms, which are tracked infantry fighting vehicles, suggests that the 30 mm and 35 mm calibers may become the new standard armament for the Western Army armored vehicles.

Russian projects

Russia's choice of weapons for its BBM fully reflects the choice of weapons discussed above for Western platforms. From available sources, for example, it is known that the Kurganmashzavod’s Kurganets-25 tracked armored vehicles are fitted with the crewless Boomerang-BM KBP combat unit, armed with an 30-mm automatic cannon with 500 rounds of 16 rounds. The same module is installed on one of the new BBM Boomerang family, which includes two options: the K-12,7 BTR with the 17-mm machine gun and the K-86 BMP with the Boomerang-BM module. Meanwhile, the family of Chinese tracked BBM Tours-1, which is a development of the family of Russian floating BMP-2011, was upgraded in the 25 year, within which the XNUMX-mm automatic gun was installed.

Bezekipazhny combat module Boomerang-BM developed by JSC "Design Bureau of Instrument"


As can be seen from the presented material, the differences between “light” and “heavy” BBM are leveled. Nothing illustrates this more clearly than the weapon systems with which they are equipped. Either through upgrades, or as part of new projects, larger caliber with a significantly increased long range and increased fire power are being introduced. The technological development of remotely controlled weapons systems and progress in optoelectronics allow the shooter to remain in the body of the machine, and not in the tower. Improving the combat effectiveness of ammunition, especially in the field of combat units and programming, also contributes to an increase in the damaging effects of weapons. The combination of tactical and operational needs of the military, enhancing combat capabilities, and the implementation of technologies that allow to achieve this, show us that weapons are no longer the decisive parameter in classifying combat armored vehicles.

Materials used:
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +2
      22 August 2017 08: 47
      30 mm of course we have already outdated, we need to work on a replacement, 57 mm of course is also not bad. but it’s also necessary to have 30mm satisfying modern requirements
      1. +3
        22 August 2017 14: 14
        We had a wonderful Shilka system and if I add new ammunition to it and ..... I saw all the boxr with theirs. Rheinmetal 1 or 2.
      2. 0
        23 August 2017 21: 17
        And why you need to jump from 30 immediately to 57 mm, because there is an excellent intermediate domestic caliber of 45 mm, it surpasses projectiles by power of 30 mm, it can penetrate the armor of almost all existing infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers, and at the same time it is much lighter than Baikal, which makes it perfect and for the modernization of the old BMP-1/2 and for the new Kurganets and Boomerang by simply replacing the BM Berezhok guns from 30 to 45 mm.
    2. RL
      22 August 2017 09: 51
      A little typo. In the commentary under the photo of the Polish Rosomak it says "produced under the license of the Finnish Patna". In fact, the company is called Patria
      1. +6
        22 August 2017 10: 53
        The Poles on their Wolverine will probably soon fly into space ... Than they don’t equip it, why don’t they cling to it ... In the final version with the Spike anti-tank missile system with additional armored protection of the advanced MIS, etc. the price of "Wolverine" is equal to (drum roll) the price of the Russian latest MBT "Armata". Yes, the KVA gun, like the Bushmaster 2, is good both in terms of penetration and in terms of the fact that its PSU kit includes remotely detonated ammunition, BUT the frontal armor of Rosomak itself is designed to protect against 14 mm KPVT ammunition that are in the Russian Army long and massively replaced with 30 mm guns, moreover, even the most armored version of the wheeled “Wolverine” (like the American “Stryker”) is unlikely to withstand the armor-piercing ammunition “Kerner” fired from the Russian cannon.
        Another thing is tracked vehicles such as the CV-90 with its powerful frontal armor and a beautiful 40 mm CTAS gun.
        As many experts correctly say, it is time to take a more thoughtful and practical approach to installing 57 mm guns on domestic armored vehicles, which is currently the Golden Mean. The direct shot range of 6 km, the ability to hit from the first shot in the frontal projection ALL known armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles of a potential enemy, the power of ammunition is worth it. You should start by installing such a gun on the T-15 (this has also been discussed many times) and launching it in a series. In addition, I would like to see the Kurganets with this weapon in the series (in BMP3, they were installed under the Derivation project).
        Yes, the BTR-82A / AM is a good / proven machine that 30 mm guns with excellent air-launched missiles didn’t get enough during the fighting in Afghanistan and Chechnya. But for new infantry fighting vehicles and heavy infantry fighting vehicles, a caliber of 57 mm is needed which will give domestic infantry fighting vehicles (APCs?) Significant advantages over the enemy.
        1. +5
          22 August 2017 11: 07
          Quote: Now we are free
          Yes, the BTR-82A / AM is a good / proven machine that 30 mm guns with excellent air-launched missiles didn’t get enough during the fighting in Afghanistan and Chechnya.

          Yes, he didn’t get the guns, but the armor, ease of landing and situational awareness of the landing ...
          And the rest - you can agree and Baikal is probably needed, but I'm not sure that the composition of the BMP and the demon PBS ....
          1. 0
            22 August 2017 23: 39
            They say that a 30-mm module makes the APC very expensive, so it may make sense to take an BMP right away.
        2. +2
          22 August 2017 12: 04
          who was to fight the BTR80 with the 30mm gun in Afghanistan and Chechnya? why then write nonsense ...
          1. +3
            22 August 2017 13: 02
            And with whom did BPM-2 fight in Chechnya? Che then write nonsense?
          2. +1
            27 August 2017 16: 34
            Do you think a 30 mm art machine on BMP-2, BMP-3 and BTR-82 is worth fighting for equipment? This is, first of all, a means to defeat enemy enemy’s aircraft and the ability to flash various shelters (including the walls of buildings). The fact that 30 mm can also crack armor is a nice bonus.
            1. 0
              27 August 2017 17: 06
              In my opinion and the CPT is enough ...
              1. +1
                1 September 2017 09: 23
                Not enough - if only because the KPVT has no high-explosive impact at all (hence, the projectile consumption is larger), the larger projectile size also allows for the creation of remote-detonation shells, while the western infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers generally already have a 14,5 mm side projection in the frontal projection in materials, however, it will only further increase the backlog.
    3. +2
      22 August 2017 17: 27
      Interesting article. I think that an increase in body armor, and, consequently, mass, will not lead to anything good. As an example, Israeli heavy BMPs for a very limited theater of operations. At the moment, the BMP-3 is almost perfect (despite the rather weak armor). And for wheeled BMP-BTR, an increase in mass of more than 30 tons greatly limits cross-country ability. The West relies on security to the detriment of armaments. BTR-82A is of course an old man, but he copes with his tasks and there is an opportunity to upgrade. An interesting machine would be obtained if the Baikal module was installed on the BMP-1.
      1. +2
        22 August 2017 20: 43
        The West relies on security to the detriment of armaments.

        What weapons - such and tactics. The main thing is to learn how to fight properly on your technique.
        But our concept, mobility to the detriment of security, does not work. BT tanks in the Second World War didn’t solve anything. Our mobile and floating armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles didn’t show anything special either. And now, we are all leaning toward better security.
        1. 0
          22 August 2017 22: 06
          Naturally, they didn’t decide - because there wasn’t any tactics, MTS and organization corresponding to this technique
          And the Germans had analogues - they very much decided, just a little bit was not enough
          1. +1
            22 August 2017 22: 14
            And the Germans had analogues - they very much decided, just a little bit was not enough

            A little bit is not considered wink
            But seriously, you are right about the Germans. But they did not succeed because not everything was worked out either. At some stage, our well-defended and armed, but slightly mobile tanks showed that you cannot go far on mobility alone. For example, Zinoviy Kalabanov on the KV-1 and 22 burned in one battle the fascist tanks.
      2. 0
        27 August 2017 16: 36
        Quote: IQ12NHJ21az
        BMP-3 is almost perfect (despite the rather weak armor)

        You are not quite right: the armor of the BMP-3 is just the thing (the front holds 30 mm, and the side - 12,7 mm). But this beautiful car unfortunately does not have protection against RPGs.
    4. +1
      22 August 2017 20: 37
      As the company noted, the tracer armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber projectile (BOS) of the CTAS 40 cannon system can penetrate armor steel more than 140 mm thick from a distance of 1,5 km.

      It is hard to believe that the 40 mm projectile at 1,5 km will penetrate the armor at 140 mm.
      1. Alf
        22 August 2017 22: 54
        Quote: glory1974
        As the company noted, the tracer armor-piercing feathered sub-caliber projectile (BOS) of the CTAS 40 cannon system can penetrate armor steel more than 140 mm thick from a distance of 1,5 km.

        It is hard to believe that the 40 mm projectile at 1,5 km will penetrate the armor at 140 mm.

        The 40 mm can still be believed. Most likely a typo.
      2. 0
        23 August 2017 21: 11
        Most likely this projectile with a composite - double core.
    5. 0
      23 August 2017 00: 53
      30m is still the norm for everyone !!! imported programmed shells - this is only advertising !!! - because they are expensive !!!! wink wassat
    6. 0
      24 August 2017 15: 55
      Yeah! LME weighing 36 tons ??? !!! (at the beginning of the article mentioned) The T-34 tank weighed 26 tons at the beginning ....
      1. 0
        17 September 2017 20: 22
        New times - new standards!
    7. +1
      18 September 2017 13: 16
      The term “easy” can now be omitted. In the near future it will be both with tanks - MBT, and with armored vehicles - OBM - the main armored vehicle. Weight not less than 35 tons, automatic gun - 30-50 mm, grenade launchers, ATGMs and MANPADS and the possibility of transporting troops. Nobody in the world now considers these vehicles as landing (from ships, planes and helicopters), therefore they are not worried about the mass-dimensional restrictions. The main concern of the Western armies is the safety of the landing, and so no one goes into their army, and even more so to fight.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"