Mattis promised to shoot down North Korean missiles

45
The Pentagon is ready to shoot down North Korean ballistic missiles launched towards the United States or their allies, reports RIA News Statement by US Secretary of Defense James Mattis.



In the event of a missile launch in the direction of the territory of Japan, Guam, USA, (South) Korea, we will take immediate concrete actions to bring it down,
said the head of the Pentagon at the ministerial meeting of the United States and Japan on security issues.

He also threatened the North Korean regime with "military consequences" in the event of an attack.

In cooperation with our allies, we will arrange serious military consequences if the DPRK starts hostile actions,
stated Mattis.

Recall the situation on the Korean Peninsula sharply aggravated after North Korea announced its readiness to launch ballistic missiles in the Guam area, where two US military bases are located. In response, Donald Trump promised to bring “fire and rage” onto North Korean territory and do with it what “no one has ever seen before.”

Later, Kim Jong-un said that he had decided “for a while to look at the stupid behavior of the Yankees,” and therefore, while postponing a missile attack on Guam.
  • AP / EAST NEWS
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    18 August 2017 08: 18
    Mattis promised to shoot down North Korean missiles

    1. +2
      18 August 2017 08: 24
      Sanya, hi! hi Do you think Eun will throw a tart on the mattresses: he won’t start firing rockets? wink
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +2
          18 August 2017 08: 34
          Tighten this Hollywood franchise.
          1. +3
            18 August 2017 08: 34
            ... And so they live wink
            1. +3
              18 August 2017 08: 49
              In general, "promise to knock down" and "knock down" are different concepts. Some also promised Russian satellites flying over their territory to bring down. lol
              1. +16
                18 August 2017 08: 53
                At the expense of the satellites, they came to their senses, remembered that we would do better. fellow
                1. +2
                  18 August 2017 08: 59
                  For those whom I hinted at, the problem is different: there is nothing to shoot down, and we have nothing to shoot down from them. lol
                  1. +6
                    18 August 2017 10: 18
                    Mattis promised to shoot down North Korean missiles

                    And for the "bazaar", Mr. Mettis will have to answer. And you will change, dear "friend", James, a warm chair, the Pentagon, on the stool of an air defense operator, and instead of importing plasma look, you’ll be framed round ....

                    SALUTES, SLAVES !!!! hi
                    1. +3
                      18 August 2017 10: 22
                      Hi, Kostya! hi I would not want your scenario to come true. Better to let this mad dog retire and knock on dominoes. Yes
                      1. +4
                        18 August 2017 10: 24
                        Pasha, dear, hello! Well, dude "signed up" - that means I have to answer .... laughing
                    2. +1
                      18 August 2017 10: 29
                      Quote: Solomon Kane
                      Well, dude "signed up" - that means I have to answer ...

                      Kostya, they have a different principle: "I gave the word, but I took it back." . wassat
    2. +16
      18 August 2017 08: 24
      Soon new tests of ICBMs in the DPRK will need to be spied.
      Is it not responding?
    3. +5
      18 August 2017 08: 52
      I understand with my mind what the consequences may be as a result of this conflict, but with my heart I am for Eun-karapuza!
      1. +16
        18 August 2017 08: 56
        The heart for it is everyone who is against the states. And some — who are for ...
  2. +3
    18 August 2017 08: 21
    Statement by US Secretary of Defense James Mattis.

    ... "dog of war" - he is a dog ... angry
    1. +3
      18 August 2017 08: 22
      Hello Seryoga! hi The warlike rhetoric of the United States against the DPRK continues, everything is normal, nothing new, gentlemen ...
      1. +3
        18 August 2017 08: 29
        Hello Pasha! hi promotion of "hitting" each other is in full swing, but Eun, the campaign, is not one of those who raise their hands to the top ...
        1. +2
          18 August 2017 08: 31
          That's the calculation of mattresses that Eun's nerves will not stand and he first smells.
          1. +3
            18 August 2017 08: 37
            Pasha, it seems to me that Eunu will not be allowed to “hit” on the merikatos ... but not ours and the Chinese, for one reason they launched the press about Ukrokaklovsky engines on Korean missiles for nothing .... no wonder the Darkest knows his profession and remembers "excellent" ... we again must at least fill up a couple of birds with one stone ...
            1. +2
              18 August 2017 08: 44
              We can only guess about all the intricacies in this story, Seryoga. And we only know what we consider necessary to tell us.
          2. +4
            18 August 2017 10: 08
            That's the calculation of mattresses that Eun's nerves will not stand and he first smells.

            Exactly..! You look what is happening in the States now .. Events in Charlottesville and Boston, etc. There really is a situation on the verge of a new civil war. And Trump now needs nosebleeds to somehow consolidate the whole of society in America. But how to do it..? Only through a small and victorious war. What does it have to do with a small and necessarily victorious one, and preferably without losses at all, or at least with single losses. Otherwise, collapse. Him as president and the States as a state. And he must necessarily expose himself so that he looks like a sort of “peacemaker” responding to some kind of external aggression. And that’s why he so tense the situation and provokes Eun with these statements with the promise of “fire and rage” and all sorts of consequences that “no one has seen” .. That is he needs to provoke Un to strike first. For this, I'm sure he can even intentionally substitute for example Guam. Eun, in turn, needs to maintain endurance and not succumb to all these provocations of the red cowboy. IMHO of course, but the situation looks something like this.
            1. +1
              18 August 2017 10: 12
              About the same thoughts I have. I think that Eun analysts are not in vain eating their bread and are also considering this option. And even if not, let VO be revered.
              1. +1
                18 August 2017 11: 26
                I think that Eun’s analysts are not in vain eating their bread and are also considering this option

                Moreover, this is indirectly confirmed by the fact that Eun declared that he was “ready for some time to look at the stupid behavior of the Yankees ..” What some local commentators perceived as a sign that Eun allegedly “was blown away” ...
                1. 0
                  18 August 2017 11: 27
                  In VO there are enough opponents and supporters of both Trump and Eun. Yes
    2. 0
      18 August 2017 08: 45
      Quote: aszzz888
      Statement by US Secretary of Defense James Mattis.

      ... "dog of war" - he is a dog ... angry

      Well, what was the US Defense Ministry to declare?
      1. +2
        18 August 2017 08: 47
        Aaron Zawi Well, what was the US Defense Ministry to declare?

        ... there are options, and one of them is negotiations with the northerners ... at least through intermediaries ...
        1. 0
          18 August 2017 10: 11
          . There are options, and one of them is negotiations with the northerners ... at least through intermediaries ...

          And what's the point ..? The northerners themselves had long since proposed negotiations. That's just the Americans what is called horned and do not want to go on negotiations by setting deliberately impracticable preconditions. That is the whole difficulty of the diplomatic settlement of this conflict.
      2. +1
        18 August 2017 11: 47
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Well, what was the US Defense Ministry to declare?

        And who gave the right to declare something, the US Defense Ministry?
  3. 0
    18 August 2017 08: 27
    An interesting point. It’s worth it, of course, to show your abilities to the fat-faced man, but if they “make out” ... Then there will be a new, much steeper round of the “greyhound” from the muzzle side.
    1. 0
      18 August 2017 08: 32
      Not. Then Plan B will be turned on - the DPRK treacherously launched a missile across Japan / Guam, it can no longer be tolerated - this is an attack on the United States and its allies. B1b / B2 and other Axes jambs went to the DPRK facilities.
      1. 0
        18 August 2017 08: 35
        And if Tolstomordov’s missiles fell in the exclusive economic zone of the Russian Federation?
        1. 0
          18 August 2017 09: 00
          I think that when they figure everything out and make sure that Eun guaranteed he will not be able to answer (and he really can do little against the Americans) then they will carry out a provocation in the style of “Remember Main”, “the incident in the Gulf of Tonkin” (the Uny state cannot reach the WTC towers) and a strike will be struck on North Korea.
          so the Americans have only one problem left - guarantees Japan and South Korea that they will not suffer much. In my unenlightened view, nothing else holds.
          China and Russia are not a deterrent, for they will wipe themselves out, or rather have already worn off (recently at the UN).
      2. 0
        18 August 2017 11: 30
        B1b / B2 and other Axes jambs went to the DPRK facilities.

        here, by the way, too, not everything is so rosy .. Here, just yesterday, in connection with all this mess, such an interesting publication came out:
        https://vpk.name/news/189589_voennyie_novosti_hva
        tit_li_bomb_pilotov_i_samoletov_vvs_ssha.html
        Who cares to read .. There is very interesting about the invincible US Air Force ..
  4. +1
    18 August 2017 08: 31
    And what prevented the Americans from shooting down these missiles during the tests before? Or not everything is so smooth with knocking feel
    1. 0
      18 August 2017 10: 13
      And what prevented the Americans from shooting down these missiles during the tests before? Or not everything is so smooth with knocking

      Apparently the fact that they themselves are not completely sure that they can bring down the New missiles. I remember this earlier even some Pentagon general said .. Despite all their loud and brave statements.
  5. +3
    18 August 2017 08: 33
    In collaboration with our allies ...

    Crowd on one, and one on one ... not how? recourse
    1. +1
      18 August 2017 10: 14
      Crowd on one, and one on one ... not how?

      And where did you see that the Americans would fight one-on-one with someone ..?
      1. +3
        18 August 2017 10: 26
        Quote: igorj 51
        And where did you see that the Americans would fight one-on-one with someone ..?

        So I say ... Weak!
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +1
    18 August 2017 08: 53
    we will take immediate concrete action to bring her down,

    The statement is normal in form. Who will allow others to fly into the window. Another thing is that Matis does not lose anything. If the missiles do not reach for technical reasons, you can still say that they were shot down, which means they are ready to defend the allies (Kazakhstan, Japan and further on the list).
  8. 0
    18 August 2017 09: 28
    Eun has already stated that he is ready to launch missiles without warheads towards Guam.
    This confrontation seems to be on hand for the Americans - training to repel a missile attack on the eve of the 3 world is more important than ever
  9. 0
    18 August 2017 09: 44
    No one will check whether he knocked or not knocked down so Mathis will always be able to boast that he knocked down. Unless, of course, a rocket falls on someone’s head, but even then there will be the remnants of a shot down rocket.
    Another thing is when the DPRK in response knocks a B-1 flying towards its territory.
  10. +2
    18 August 2017 10: 47
    Quote: aszzz888
    ... there are options, and one of them is negotiations with the northerners ... at least through intermediaries ...

    Actually, this is not his diocese, negotiations. He replied as MANDATORY DEFENSE MINISTER RESPONSIBLE. Our defense minister would just as well have answered that we would be shooting down missiles coming at us and at our allies. And negotiations are the business of politicians (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and others).

    Quote: Observer2014
    And what prevented the Americans from shooting down these missiles during the tests before? Or not everything is so smooth with knocking feel

    During the tests, the missiles went in a completely different direction and practically did not threaten any of the neighbors. They let them along a steep path to a relatively short range. There were a couple of cases when North Korean missiles fell in the exclusive economic zone of Japan (this is about 200 miles from the coast of Japan), but not in territorial waters. There was a case (several years ago) when the Hwasong-10 rocket, also known as the Musudan, fell 70-100 kilometers from Vladivostok. Last year (or I don’t remember that anymore), a North Korean rocket fell a few hundred kilometers from Vladivostok. The air defense was alerted, but the missile did not pose a threat, why shoot down. Therefore, the Americans did not shoot down, because their launches were not a threat. And if they are going to launch around Guam now, it is quite possible that the trajectory will pass over the territory of Japan and possibly South Korea. And this is a completely different scenario. At what height and whether will there be any missile defense systems in reach of Japan and South Korea?
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +1
    19 August 2017 10: 16
    In response, Donald Trump promised to bring down “fire and rage” on the territory of North Korea and to do with it what “no one has ever seen”.
    It is unlikely to succeed. America has already tried everything in its bloody history, the world will not succeed, and even more so Koreans, than to surprise anyone.
  13. 0
    19 August 2017 20: 43
    how will they be interesting to shoot them down? supersonic rockets
  14. 0
    19 August 2017 21: 14
    I don’t know the technical data of the DPRK missiles, and I’m not going to be a “fan” in this serious confrontation.
    it was not enough to bet whether the Americans would hit the DPRK missiles. Gentlemen, commentators need to be more serious about this,
    because the consequences of it can end sadly for the whole world.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"