Military Review

Accident of the deck fighter J-15 Navy PLA

19
According to the blog dambiev, during a training flight, a J-15 fighter piloted by the deputy commander of the 10th aviation regiment of the 4th aviation PLA Navy division senior colonel Yuan Wei, collided with a flock of birds, causing damage to the left engine. The pilot managed to land the plane. There are no casualties.


Accident of the deck fighter J-15 Navy PLA








Over the past decade, China has been developing the J-15 carrier-based fighter, which is the deck version of the Soviet Su-27. Russia has its own deck version of this aircraft, called the Su-33. At the time, the Russian Federation refused to sell the Su-33 to China when it turned out that China produces illegal copies of the Su-27 (known as J-11) and do not want to order large quantities of the Su-33, but only two aircraft for their "assessment" . Ultimately, in the 2001 year, China received the Su-33 from Ukraine, which inherited a certain number of these aircraft during the collapse of the USSR.
Photos used:
http://dambiev.livejournal.com/947211.html
19 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Same lech
    Same lech 17 August 2017 04: 31
    +5
    There are no casualties.


    crying Sorry for the birds.

    And according to the clone SU-33 VO already posted the article ...
    https://topwar.ru/21837-palubnoe-sravnenie-j-15-l
    uchshe-su-33.html
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 17 August 2017 04: 42
      +4
      The Chinese forgot how to drive sparrows. laughing
      1. Same lech
        Same lech 17 August 2017 04: 44
        +2
        The Chinese forgot how to drive sparrows.


        smile Chinese kung fu sparrows are at the level of air fighters.
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 17 August 2017 07: 57
      +4
      Well J-15 promote Dryer. In terms of functionality, it came out as the MiG-29K among the Chinese.

      Plus the article is old. At the last maneuvers - they conducted a bunch of exercises. Including take-off from anti-ship missiles - launch of anti-ship missiles on target - landing on AB. Su-33 cannot in RCC.

      And on board, the new avionics, a large and functional ILS from the 5 generation were screwed again.
  2. tlauicol
    tlauicol 17 August 2017 04: 33
    +3
    Well done Chinese
  3. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 17 August 2017 06: 00
    +5
    ... 10th Aviation Regiment of the 4th Aviation Division of the PLA Navy ...
    10-thregiment 4-oh divisions ... and this is the Navy, as well as the Air Force! You can’t forbid to live beautifully ... We have a very long border, but by troops (as it was not adequately covered during the Soviet era). This is alarming to me, even according to all sources they blow us that we are strategic partners with the Chinese, we will drive America together, our science and their industry will turn mountains. Nowhere is this partnership militarily recorded, and their main trade partner is America. Therefore, I am glad that I am with the senior colonel everything worked out well, but their army’s fighting efficiency is somehow not very good. They won’t climb through the Amur tomorrow, but even in the medium term there can be friction between our countries in Central Asia (in the former republics) or in the Asian part of Russia. The Chinese jump out of their pants to provide themselves with resources (oil, water, ores), they begin to quietly expand into Africa. We have all this, but in terms of power and potential, we have been turning into a younger partner and brother since the collapse of the USSR. No numbers will give lies.
  4. irazum
    irazum 17 August 2017 06: 32
    +7
    Well done pilot! And for the "assessment" it is time to stop selling. We know perfectly well how it all ends. When they learn to reproduce our engines normally, they will spit on all agreements and take away most of the market for themselves.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 17 August 2017 06: 36
    +3
    In such cases, it’s not a sin to applaud the pilot.
  6. igorj 51
    igorj 51 17 August 2017 06: 57
    +2
    According to dambiev's blog, during a training flight, a J-15 fighter, piloted by Deputy Colonel Yuan Wei, deputy commander of the 10th Aviation Regiment of the 4th Aviation Division of the PLA, encountered a flock of birds, which caused damage to the left engine. The pilot managed to land the plane. There are no casualties.

    Well done pilot ..! But the number of their naval aviation is really impressive .. especially against the background of the fact that in Russia, naval aviation as a branch of the Navy was eliminated even under Serdyukov.
    1. tomket
      tomket 17 August 2017 08: 37
      +1
      Quote: igorj 51
      But the number of their naval aviation is really impressive .. especially against the background of the fact that in Russia naval aviation as a branch of the Navy was

      We have ... "Ah there is no money, ah how expensive everything is around, but who will keep it all, and there will be enough 10 planes for all of Russia, all around there are only partners, Rusnano does not have enough money and you’re here with your planes, a lot of planes are not an efficient waste of money, but it’s better to put money in the American economy than to spend on hardware ”.... well and so on ..
  7. 1 Navigator
    1 Navigator 17 August 2017 07: 03
    +2
    From a joke, you pass a meaningful silence for a chervonets and a mother and a father, but we are garne spyavaya!
  8. Vikxnumx
    Vikxnumx 17 August 2017 08: 01
    +2
    Well done pilot!
    hi
  9. Alexei. AND.
    Alexei. AND. 17 August 2017 10: 17
    0
    The planes are the same, then in a battle like in the war with Georgia in Shinval, we will shoot down our own! "Friendly Fire" .... Aircraft carrier also sold to the Chinese ?! All the bastards squandered !!!
    1. Ratmir_Ryazan
      Ratmir_Ryazan 17 August 2017 10: 51
      0
      There seems to be a friend or foe system ... Now, even at Verba MANPADS, someone said that it is also present ... But of course this is bad and there will be confusion ...
    2. tomket
      tomket 17 August 2017 12: 27
      0
      Quote: Alexey. AND.
      Aircraft carrier also sold to the Chinese ?! All the bastards squandered !!!

      By the way, in “Varyag” we did not show any interest, and when “power changed”, it was too late, “Varyag” sold. Ulyanovsk, however, was initially doomed in those economic and political conditions. Despite the fact that it could have been completed by the 95 year, while maintaining supplies of allies and financing., But under Yeltsin this was not possible.
  10. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 17 August 2017 10: 49
    0
    Interestingly, Ukraine helped out a lot for the Su-33? Did it help them support their air force or production? No words, everyone squandered ...
  11. lukewarm
    lukewarm 18 August 2017 11: 05
    0
    Senior Colonel certainly well done. Smiled another:
    At one time, the Russian Federation refused to sell the Su-33 to China, when it turned out that China was making illegal copies of the Su-27 (known as the J-11) and did not want to order large quantities of the Su-33, but only two aircraft for their "assessment"

    But S-400 - please. We are not afraid of copying. Or are things so bad that money is needed at all costs?
    Here VO wrote about this deal in 2015.
    https://topwar.ru/73215-pervym-pokupatelem-zrs-s-
    400-triumf-stal-china.html
  12. masterovoy
    masterovoy 18 August 2017 11: 06
    +1
    Quote: irazum
    Well done pilot! And for the "assessment" it's time to stop selling. We know perfectly well how it all ends. When they learn to reproduce our engines normally, they will spit on all agreements and take away most of the market for themselves.

    "It’s too late to drink Borjomi when something has fallen off."
  13. Leonid Har
    Leonid Har 18 August 2017 13: 01
    0
    Su27 in person. But what about copyright and all that?