Military Review
Sign In Register

CEO: KTRV products have shown high efficiency in Syria

31
The Tactical Missile Armament Corporation (KTRV) is satisfied with how the missile and bomb weapons they are developing and producing have shown themselves in Syria when striking terrorists. Interfax-AVN the statement of the general director of the company Boris Obnosov.



I will not go into details, I will only say that we are satisfied with how our products performed in Syria,
said Obnosov to the agency.

He noted that "the Ministry of Defense regularly provides video information via the Internet and TV channels about the launching of missile and bomb attacks on the targets of the terrorist organization ISIS (IS, banned in the Russian Federation), which, as they say, does not require comment."

Real fighting is probably the criterion by which to judge the effectiveness weapons... You can say a lot about products, show them at stands with all the technical characteristics. But when there is a practical use of weapons, and we know the real result, then this is precisely the mirror in which we must look and see whether we are going in the right direction,
said the general director.

Commenting on the recently shown on TV story about the combat use of the newest Russian strategic air-launched cruise missile X-101 in Syria, he noted that this product surpasses all foreign counterparts in its characteristics.

For well-known reasons, I cannot detail the characteristics that have already been named in the media. This product is unique. In terms of such parameters as range, cost, efficiency, I think no one has yet stood near,
said Obnosov.

Most importantly, he added, "there is a good prospect in the future to significantly improve the flight performance and combat characteristics of this missile."
Photos used:
frame of the video of the Ministry of Defense of Russia
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
31 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. SRC P-15
    SRC P-15 14 August 2017 15: 14
    +9
    Well, now the west can be sent to the X-101 (time) wassat !
    1. Thrall
      Thrall 14 August 2017 15: 17
      +3
      Cheaper to troll with barrel bombs smile
      1. cniza
        cniza 14 August 2017 15: 20
        +3
        Syria will change a lot in terms of weapons and their use.
      2. Fedor WOTP
        Fedor WOTP 14 August 2017 16: 50
        +1
        Cheaper ... But the practical launches of the CD are constantly taking place according to the combat training plan ... And here it is based on real goals ...
        1. ancient
          ancient 14 August 2017 17: 37
          +3
          Quote: Fedor VOTP
          But practical launches of the CD are constantly taking place according to the combat training plan ... And here it is carried out according to real goals.


          And what is the practical difference? Launch on a pre-programmed target, in the launch according to the BP plan, you can go beyond the track directory (blow in), fail to withstand the time parameters (blow in), fail to withstand the flight mode (blow in), the missile will leave the "route" (track) (the same blow in) , and here ...... unhooked and ...... goodbye wink since .. she went .... darling! wink
    2. alcor
      alcor 14 August 2017 15: 21
      +2
      To be honest, our missile hits in Syria were not impressive. Very flat trajectory. hits and you can see how a sufficiently large explosion energy simply passes through the building and is not used for its intended purpose. And the accuracy is far from perfect, Or near, or at the edge of the building. "Tomahawks" in the Syrian airbase left a strong impression, very close to the geometric center of the shelter, vertically, the target was hit without options ... It is clear that they have dozens of times more experience in combat use, but ours should not be so proud, everything will not be worse than theirs over time, but bravura marches are premature ...
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 14 August 2017 15: 22
        +15
        Quote: alkor
        I'll be honest

        Keep observing. We will contact you shortly.
      2. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 14 August 2017 15: 24
        +6
        Quote: alkor
        "Tomahawks in the Syrian airbase left a strong impression, very close to the geometric center of the shelter, vertically, the target was hit with no options ...

        Are these the ones that did not fly? lol
        1. alcor
          alcor 14 August 2017 17: 23
          +2
          Quote: SRC P-15
          Quote: alkor
          "Tomahawks in the Syrian airbase left a strong impression, very close to the geometric center of the shelter, vertically, the target was hit with no options ...

          Are these the ones that did not fly? lol

          Did you find out about this on TV that you didn't fly?))) Do you believe it yourself? Okay, then I'll add on top. How many rockets were launched in one salvo by the amers? How much do we allow ourselves to lift in one volley? Against the background of amers, our attempts look a little funny. Don't underestimate your opponent. No need to throw your hats. It is necessary to conduct a calm analysis of both economic and technical possibilities. I see no reason to admire. Once I talked with one person, fought there for many years. I asked about the advantages and disadvantages of specific types of weapons. And he told me - I don't want to know about the shortcomings, otherwise I will stop believing in weapons. I was taken aback. I fundamentally disagree. To fight successfully, you need to know what to hope for in a particular case, and which modes and types of combat to avoid. I do not understand why this was not clear to that military man. And I don’t understand why you, dear SRTs P-15, don’t see it.
          1. DenZ
            DenZ 14 August 2017 19: 06
            0
            Quote: alkor
            And he told me - I don't want to know about the shortcomings, otherwise I will stop believing in weapons. I was taken aback. Fundamentally disagree

            Well, yes, you need to constantly be in the mood for a whiner so that everything is fine with you. Guess what is your credo?
            Quote: alkor
            Very flat trajectory. hits and you can see how a sufficiently large explosion energy simply passes through the building and is not used for its intended purpose.

            That is, you made a hole in the building, blowing up all the insides and it was not for its intended purpose? wassat
        2. ancient
          ancient 14 August 2017 17: 29
          +3
          Quote: СРЦ П-15
          Are these the ones that did not fly?


          It's like in a movie or what? ... "The elder said .... they didn't fly ... so ... they didn't." wassat
          It was you ... who were "beating" them with "concern"? wassat
      3. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 14 August 2017 16: 19
        +6
        Quote: alkor
        Tomahawks "in the Syrian airbase left a strong impression, very close to the geometric center of the shelter, vertically, the target was hit with no options ...

        While there is no object missile defense / air defense, you can roll up "hills" in front of the target.
        But for an object with a strong missile defense / air defense, every second * on a hill * will threaten to shoot down a missile defense ...
        So why be touched here? request
        1. tlauicol
          tlauicol 14 August 2017 16: 25
          +3
          and what kind of air defense / missile defense threatened our missiles?
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 14 August 2017 16: 29
            +1
            Quote: Tlauicol
            and what kind of air defense / missile defense threatened our missiles?

            So about ours you write unflattering: straight and to the edge - the corner of the goal,
            and their height apparently does not suit you ...
            That's why they fly like that ... bully
            1. tlauicol
              tlauicol 14 August 2017 16: 34
              +2
              Yes, I have not written anything yet, but the "slide" really would not hurt - dive into the basement and you're done! otherwise the one-story building with Caliber cannot be folded, and in the depths of the development it will be difficult to hit individual buildings - not all "they" are sitting in the farms
        2. ancient
          ancient 14 August 2017 17: 52
          +3
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          While there is no object missile defense / air defense, you can roll up "hills" in front of the target.


          Hello Sea Serpent fellow
          Ax's attack algorithms have several options, so he is .. "omnivorous" wink ,those. complete any assigned task to destroy a specific target ..
          and the hill at the Ax is only 200 meters in height and the pitch-up entry is 2 km before the target.
          If the air defenses were not detected in advance ... The ax will be on target, and how many of them will there be in the salvo? And in the stream? recourse
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 14 August 2017 22: 57
            +2
            Quote: ancient
            Hello Sea Serpent

            Hello, missing! fellow
            For once in a century something worthy has appeared with us.
            So on you - "well-wishers" are in a hurry to shit ...!
            It's a shame, you know !!! laughing
      4. Fedor WOTP
        Fedor WOTP 14 August 2017 16: 56
        0
        You are a deletant and do not understand well what Tomahawks are ... Tomahawks are long outdated missile launchers, which are significantly inferior to our X-55 in accuracy, range and invisibility from air defense systems ... X-55 are already being removed from service and replaced by X-101 and X-102 ... Americans are better than outdated Tomahawks, they can create nothing ...
        1. ancient
          ancient 14 August 2017 17: 53
          +3
          Quote: Fedor VOTP
          Tomahawks are long-outdated missile launchers, which are significantly inferior to our Kh-55s in accuracy, range and invulnerability from air defense systems.


          Throwing hats with "yelling" is probably not here yet? I hope so?
      5. Fedor WOTP
        Fedor WOTP 14 August 2017 17: 05
        0
        You are a complete deletant ... Tomahawks are outdated missile launchers - which are significantly inferior to our Kh-55s in range, accuracy and invulnerability from air defense systems ... Now the Kh-55 is being removed from service and replaced by the Kh-101 and Kh-102 it is very difficult to intercept American air defenses ... While Tomahawks are easily intercepted by our air defenses, and even more so by air defense aviation - MIG-31 ... In addition, massive launches guarantee a 100 percent probability of targeting - especially with a nuclear warhead ...
        1. ancient
          ancient 14 August 2017 17: 27
          +4
          Quote: Fedor VOTP
          While Tomahawks are easily intercepted by our air defense and, all the more, air defense aviation - MIG-31


          1. List of Axes "easily intercepted by our air defense" .. well, for example, during the attack of the Shayrat airbase? wink or HDE "istcho"? wassat
          2. Do you, dear MiG-31, have enough to intercept at least ... something ... an acre of previously known targets with a launch site, launch time, course and flight altitude?
          Themselves, I suppose .. "so many ..." intercepted "that ... just hats ... not enough"? wassat
        2. sivuch
          sivuch 15 August 2017 09: 34
          +3
          I don’t know who’s an amateur, but the word itself is spelled with and. And, by the way, it’s not worth going to the individual, there are other resources for this.
      6. kos2910
        kos2910 15 August 2017 05: 58
        0
        Quote: alkor
        "Tomahawks" in the Syrian airbase

        And those that didn't make it, were they also impressed? Already they do not really hide that Rubella has worked, since they carefully bypassed the scope of the S-400 and S-300
    3. Tusv
      Tusv 14 August 2017 16: 15
      +2
      Quote: SRC P-15
      Well, now the west can be sent to the X-101 (time)

      The foe should have a very vomiting reaction to such hahatushki. We were taught to fight with such hahatushki. and Patriot is a pass hi
    4. ancient
      ancient 14 August 2017 17: 33
      +2
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      Well, now the west can be sent to the X-101 (time)


      The required ATTACHMENT required to complete the assigned task includes POWER and FACILITIES soldier Well, with FORCES it is clear ... there is a little bit (for entot year already whole 60 pieces ... ordered, I hope sarcasm poyatnen)?
      But what about ... MEANS? How fast do you have READY carriers under .. "STE business"?
      So before you send ... you need to HAVE SOMETHING!
      And so far we can only .. WARNING !!!
      And these are different things, although already far from ... "concern", but much SEVERE soldier
  2. Monarchist
    Monarchist 14 August 2017 15: 35
    0
    To complete the picture, we must ask the barmaleevs: are they satisfied with the quality of missiles and bombs? It would be cool to hear their opinion
    1. ML-334
      ML-334 14 August 2017 16: 07
      +2
      When a blizzard was blowing behind the scenes, one phrase was repeated, but how many shades of voice, from fear to horror, I think that this is the assessment of our weapon.
  3. alcor
    alcor 14 August 2017 17: 24
    +1
    Quote: BoA KAA
    Quote: alkor
    Tomahawks "in the Syrian airbase left a strong impression, very close to the geometric center of the shelter, vertically, the target was hit with no options ...

    While there is no object missile defense / air defense, you can roll up "hills" in front of the target.
    But for an object with a strong missile defense / air defense, every second * on a hill * will threaten to shoot down a missile defense ...
    So why be touched here? request

    I, dear, was not touched. I assessed in terms of the effectiveness of hitting the target.
  4. ded100
    ded100 14 August 2017 21: 38
    +1
    In terms of such parameters as range, cost, efficiency, I think no one has stood by yet,

    But this is very important and very happy !!! good
  5. Santor
    Santor 14 August 2017 22: 03
    0
    Quote: alkor
    How many rockets were launched in one salvo by the amers?

    According to the data of the Greek Navy, 64 missiles were launched from both EMs ... Two immediately fell into the water because the starting engines did not work after the ejection, 4 were destroyed by the operators because they "lost their orientation", the rest spanked towards Syria .. Well, then count.
  6. Mentat
    Mentat 15 August 2017 09: 38
    0
    Quote: alkor
    No need to throw your hats. It is necessary to conduct a calm analysis of both economic and technical possibilities. I see no reason to admire.

    Is it the opposite of your hysteria?
    Where did you see "admire"? There is a quote with a simple statement: "At the moment, in terms of characteristics, this product is ahead of its counterparts."