Military Review

Operation Seryozha, or What Udaltsov accuses leaders of unsystematic opposition

39
On August 8, a man named Sergei Udaltsov was released. The same Sergei Udaltsov, who, being the leader of the so-called “Left Front”, was found guilty of organizing mass riots during the so-called “March of millions”. The same Sergey Udaltsov, who acknowledged the fact of contacts with a Georgian citizen Georgy Targamadze, is a well-known decision to sponsor non-systemic opposition in various post-Soviet republics. The same Sergey Udaltsov, who in the wake of 2011-2012 protests acted, in fact, united front with Alexei Navalny, positioning himself almost the main oppositionist and fighter against corruption in Russia.


And after the release of Udaltsov from places of deprivation of liberty, the situation on the opposition in our country, by definition, is heating up. The more interesting, especially considering one simple fact: the stagnation in the so-called "systemic" opposition has reached such forms that the reality of the political struggle turned into a farce, in which the leaders of parliamentary parties, declaratively oppositional to United Russia, unless they are passionately kissing making. For the umpteenth time we have to admit that if such a political system in the country is not modernized in a civilized way, then the country will receive another version of the late CPSU with all the consequences for the bureaucracy and disinterest of the party apparatchiks. But it is necessary to figure out whether it’s possible for Udaltsov to diversify the political palette of the Russian Federation.

So he is free. The first thing that Udaltsov did was to begin in the format of an interview to announce his “post-sub-political” position. The main change in this very position is that Udaltsov is no longer going to act as a united front with Mr. Navalny. At the same time, Udaltsov, who himself was not averse to accepting financial assistance from foreign forces (speaking about the same Targamadze), in an interview reports that “he will not follow Navalny, because forces that are hostile to Russia are behind”. At the same time, Udaltsov specifies that, firstly, on the basis of Russian legislation, they still will not be allowed to stand for election, and, secondly, even if Navalny’s registration as a candidate would take place, Udaltsov would not supported.

Sergey Udaltsov:
Bulk is not my president. (...) The only cooperation option that I can consider is cooperation on the principles of equality.


Udaltsov concretized that left views remain pretty to him, and with the liberal opposition can hardly be along the way.
There are several reasons for such a split of the once “welded opposition”. The fact is that, while continuing to come out with harsh criticism of the authorities, Udaltsov supports certain decisions of the Kremlin. In particular, Udaltsov supports the recognition of Crimea as an integral part of Russia, carried out on the basis of the Crimean referendum. And in the camp of the liberal opposition often slip phrases from the series: "Crimea must be returned to Ukraine", "It will reconcile us with the West", "Crimea costs us all too dearly", as if one of the Internet memes says, they cost us too much the liberals themselves in 90 ...

And further. Udaltsov, who was released, said that he considered the forces with which he had once tried to go shoulder to shoulder as possible provocateurs acting solely within the framework of the concept of splitting the opposition movement. Udaltsov in an interview with colleagues Anatoly Sharia says that he has no evidence, but there are suspicions.

According to the “Levofrontovtsev,” he was perplexed and continues to be perplexed about the manner in which such people acted, calling themselves oppositionists like Ilya Ponomarev and Ksenia Sobchak, the same Navalny. Udaltsov believes that they could somehow be connected with the authorities - to carry out provocations, calling on the protesters to abandon the agreed protest and move on to clashes with law enforcement officers in the territories, where the authorities did not sanction the rally. Have your eyes opened? ..

Udaltsov’s claims against his former comrades on the March of Millions look more like a grudge. Indeed, the leader of the “Left Front” and a few other people, as it turns out, “rewound” the sentence for themselves and for that guy. “Those guys” (and not only) today who is where, but only not behind bars. Ponomarev gives lectures in Lithuania, in the USA, somewhere else. Bulk with a number of conditional dates (the limit of which, apparently, is absent) travels around the resorts of the European Union. Ksenia Sobchak turned from an implacable oppositionist into an exemplary mother. Duty protests are organized with the involvement of shkolota and other “disgruntled owners of iPhones” - for the rest, peace and quiet. "Trojan horse" Udaltsov calls Sobchak and asks the question: did it not happen that the very people with whom he walked along Bolotnaya and Sakharov made the switchman out of him, considering them to be his companions?

At the same time, Udaltsov himself states that if an operation of the current authorities took place, then it worked: neither he nor the same Navalny could appear for a long time on a legitimate basis in the Russian political segment - criminal cases erased such a prospect. Sobchak, of course, will not get anywhere without criminal cases, considering at least the fact that her mother (she’s the widow of Anatoly Sobchak) is not only a member of the Federation Council, but also a fairly close “friend” of President Vladimir Putin.



That is, the leaders of the non-systemic opposition are out of the brackets of a legitimate political struggle, and the oppositional leaders of the systemic opposition are used to talking only about television screens. The operation of the ruling party, it must be stated, passed by five points, and therefore real, healthy (as far as possible) political competition is not foreseen in the near future. Thus, the party of the parliamentary majority is trying to declare that "there is no replacement, and there can not be." Like, the terms are not opposition, but criminals ... "Is there really a choice?"

There were really enough criminals. For example, Voronenkov. Oh, yes ... He was a system ...

It is clear that the same Udaltsov - material waste. Bulk is the person who switches the protest switch to cause public anger at himself when it is most beneficial.

Attempts to eliminate competition from quite healthy, patriotic and pragmatic forces (not about Navalny, Sobchak, Ponomarev and Udaltsov, of course), as already noted, may well lead to the birth of the “CPSU 2.0” when “yay! ”And“ odobryamsy ”do not allow even look around, so as not to get a knockout blow from those forces that in the legitimate vein of the political struggle are not accustomed to act.
Author:
Photos used:
YouTube / Anatoly Shary
39 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ImPerts
    ImPerts 15 August 2017 06: 17
    +4
    I watched these two parts of the interview with Udaltsov.
    He in every possible way refused to meet Targamadze.
    He actively promoted the idea of ​​struggle, but in a legitimate field, with those in power.
    And Shariy has a serious conflict with Shariy (kneading).
    He trolls him in black.
    Click here for an interview with a young follower of the Navalny sect, who don't like modern educationAs exams are getting harder and harder:
    1. 210ox
      210ox 15 August 2017 06: 24
      +5
      From chamber №6 another one was released ..
      1. maxim947
        maxim947 16 August 2017 05: 27
        +1
        Where are we going ?! If such illiterate gorlopans find supporters, and even the media help them spin ...
      2. Baloo
        Baloo 17 August 2017 21: 41
        +1
        Quote: 210ox
        From chamber №6 another one was released ..

        Bullshit of overvalued ideas, megalomania ...
        It’s easy to guess who will go after him again, the kriminalet, shkolota, fans, lumpen, “new wave” politics and other mold. He was going to be friends with whom he had already spoken out in his first interview, with the left movements of America and Europe. He’s not going to say what to live on. Someone who finances it will also be silent, but you have to pay taxes on this, Mr. * daredevils, or like you mother and father.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 15 August 2017 09: 55
      +2
      Prison is a proven school for revolutionaries of all stripes. It seems that Udaltsov was mortally offended by Navalny.
      1. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 15 August 2017 10: 40
        +3
        A ghost wanders around Russia - the ghost of the Udaltsovs laughing
        “He was born on February 16, 1977 in Moscow. Sergey’s father, Doctor of Historical Sciences, professor Stanislav Vasilyevich Tyutyukin [2]. Sergey is the grandson of Ivan Udaltsov, doctor of historical sciences, chairman of the board of the Novosti Press Agency (1970-1976) and USSR ambassador to Greece (1976-1979); nephew of the ambassador of the Russian Federation to Latvia in 1997-2001, Alexander Udaltsov; great-grandson of the rector of Moscow State University and the first director of MGIMO, member of the Bolshevik party since 1905, doctor of legal sciences Ivan Dmitrievich Udaltsov, after whom the street in Moscow was named [ 3].
        In 1998, while studying at the law faculty of the Moscow State Academy of Water Transport (MGAWT), he organized and led the movement "Vanguard of the Red Youth" (AKM), which was the youth wing of the movement "Labor Russia" by Viktor Anpilov. "
        Or you can’t forbid to live beautifully on crowd speculation!
  2. nivander
    nivander 15 August 2017 06: 39
    +2
    a spider was thrown into a jar of cockroaches
  3. populist
    populist 15 August 2017 06: 51
    +4
    For the umpteenth time, we have to admit that if such a political system in the country is not modernized in a civilized way, then in the end the country will receive another version of the late CPSU with all the consequences for the bureaucracy and for the disinterest of party apparatchiks in the real development of the country.

    "We have another" version of the late CPSU "for ten years. And the late USSR, too. hi
    1. Akuzenka
      Akuzenka 17 August 2017 12: 53
      0
      Read the topic. On a fresh track. https://nstarikov.ru/blog/83462
  4. The leader of the Redskins
    The leader of the Redskins 15 August 2017 07: 11
    +3
    This slippery type is Udaltsov, according to the information that skips in the media. For some reason, the phrase from the movie immediately comes to mind: - "And the Cossack - it’s mishandled ...."
    1. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. Kenxnumx
      Kenxnumx 15 August 2017 07: 36
      +6
      The authorities should on the basis of the fact that the creation of equal conditions for political forces is a constitutional norm. And following the constitution is a direct responsibility of the authorities.
      1. ADmA_RUS
        ADmA_RUS 15 August 2017 08: 23
        +6
        Prohibit parties? No. Filter and censor information about the same Inception? No. At any convenient case, give the maximum time to the oppositionists? No. Prohibit or limit fundraising for parties? No. Do not fundamentally hold mass events? No.
        What else does?
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 15 August 2017 08: 54
          +1
          Quote: ADmA_RUS
          What else does?

          Discard all parties. Enough to be sheep, as if choosing a shepherd.
          1. seos
            seos 15 August 2017 09: 45
            +1
            At the current level of technology, every citizen can vote for this or that law himself, without the help of "servants of the people" ... only no one will give us such an opportunity ...
            1. ADmA_RUS
              ADmA_RUS 15 August 2017 10: 32
              0
              What are your future actions? How do you plan to implement your idea?
            2. Akuzenka
              Akuzenka 17 August 2017 12: 59
              +1
              Even if they provide, then you personally are able to calculate what the adoption of this or that law can lead to? Yes, something lies on the surface, but very rarely. But basically, even a THINKING person cannot do this. It takes a lot of time to analyze ALL factors (they still need to be recognized). If you do this, then you just have to do it. Otherwise, there will be trash. Now imagine, they came to your neighbor and offered money for listening to a “consultation on the law” (do not think, not a bribe). A patch (pension, allowance) from a neighbor is miserable. Do you think he will heed the consultation?
          2. ADmA_RUS
            ADmA_RUS 15 August 2017 10: 30
            0
            Then you need to build communism. Ready?
        2. Kenxnumx
          Kenxnumx 15 August 2017 11: 12
          +1
          For example, remove the percentage for passing to the Duma. It’s somehow more adequate to distribute venues for rallies and speeches. Prevent candidates from refusing to participate in debates.
          1. ADmA_RUS
            ADmA_RUS 15 August 2017 13: 36
            0
            How do 1-3 votes affect the stats? How is the current system of allocating a venue for rallies inadequate? About the debate. Do you suggest breaking the constitution?
        3. happy
          happy 16 August 2017 01: 44
          +1
          Bulk, in fact, is a swindler. Political con man, a man who imitates politics, to beg for money.
          Moreover, Navalny perfectly stuck to the grants and receives a decent dough. Hiding behind donuts from schoolchildren lunches.
          I am sure Navalny himself does not go to TV. Who wanted, he was there. Pushed their speeches.
          But Navalny, this is not necessary.
          1. Akuzenka
            Akuzenka 17 August 2017 13: 04
            +1
            He is not a swindler! He just works off dollars. If you can say, he sells his persona. Most likely, he didn’t even realize that he could easily be in the role of Nemtsov, but he couldn’t get off. He banged (when necessary), those who pay him. And bang in any case, in case of loss they need a sacred sacrifice. And he won’t have a victory.
        4. would
          would 18 August 2017 13: 15
          0
          You clearly see poor awareness. I'll probably stand for the truth.

          Prohibit parties?


          Do you know that in order to submit party lists for participation in the elections you need to submit a certain number of signatures of citizens? Well, except for those that the electoral commission recognized as supported and they do not need any signatures. Surely you know. Nobody forbids parties, just when collecting signatures, tools are introduced that automatically reject most of the real signatures. The most favorite is the FMS base, which is known for its "incredible accuracy." There is only the last passport of the girl who is 21 years old in the database, but did she sign up for a new one? Signature is invalid. The stamp in the passport indicates the registration of d. 21, apt. 2, and in the FMS database d.21 / 2. Signature is invalid. And so on and so forth.

          Something you do not like? Well, go to court, bring people with passports there, and then the court will decide in your favor with respect to the people who came specifically. However, this will happen after the election, and even if you finally get the required number of valid signatures, the elections have taken place and no one will cancel them. Looking forward to the next!

          So in Novosibirsk got rid of Parnassus

          https://www.leonidvolkov.ru/p/33/

          So in due time in Moscow got rid of Katz.

          Regardless of my opinion on these parties and personalities, we are here analyzing the actual side of things, and not how I feel about this whole fraternity.

          Filter and censor information about the same Inception? No.


          Officially, the word Posner yes. At the debate on Rain, he directly said that Navalny is forbidden to appear on the first except in the news. "Editorial policy." Actually, you yourself can try to recall when Bulk gave an interview at the First or Russia 1 or participated in a debate there. And we have a large part of the population watching the first two buttons, and not all of these Internet. Especially those resources on which Navalny appears well, at least in a neutral light.

          At any convenient case, give the maximum time to the oppositionists? No.


          Well, depending on how. I recommend that before declaring this to read the "swamp business", as well as other similar processes. And you will find out, for example, that you can simply walk alongside the action along the way from work to home and be detained for participating in mass riots. In a business suit and white shirt. Or how things are built only on the confusing testimony of the police themselves about how and who grabbed their hand thereby causing them physical pain.

          Timing and rigidity depends on the situation. In Khabarovsk, for example, everything was extremely calm and they didn’t even really blame anyone, in Moscow you can get into a very serious binding and hear from time to time “The court has no reason not to trust a police officer”.

          Do not fundamentally hold mass events? No.


          Including. So, for example, in the refusal to coordinate the violation of the Federal Law there are no alternative options as was the procession along Tverskaya Navalny. Or how it was in Khabarovsk, after submitting the documents, the head finds out that exactly 5 minutes before your arrival the Young Guard filed the documents. And after the trial, the person from the Guard who allegedly submitted the documents cannot name the number of the cabinet to which they submitted and explain how it happened that he did not meet with the representative of Navalny’s supporter. In general, 6 sites announced and all of them were busy. Unbelievable! Well, I will not even mention the fact that the same students are threatened with expulsion.
    2. Boris55
      Boris55 15 August 2017 08: 56
      0
      Quote: ADmA_RUS
      it is necessary to get rid of the illusion that the government should do something.

      And not figs then, before becoming a power, nor what to promise, then nothing should either. The truth then will not become power. In general, it is necessary to answer for the bazaar. laughing
  6. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 15 August 2017 10: 58
    0
    Hehe hehe ... the opposition with two leaders - somewhere I already saw it. smile
    All the same, the old scenario of neutralizing the Opps, tested by time at Yabloko and SPS. Before each election, Grisha and Borey almost kissed each other, promising a single candidate who would certainly overthrow the current government ... and after a couple of weeks they began to water each other with slops and divide the electorate.
  7. Odysseus
    Odysseus 15 August 2017 12: 07
    +3
    Sergei Udaltsov, in his outlook, is a classic Social Revolutionary. Of those who are preparing a revolution, and not preparing for a revolution, he is so omnivorous in his methods and people that he is trying to use, that it is not clear whether he works for socialism, or for his popularity, or even worse he works for someone himself.
    I thought that after prison he would grow wiser, but so far there is no sign of this. Immediately upon leaving I gave a sensible press conference, and then I ran for some reason to the place of Nemtsov’s murder and to Ekho Moskvy. That he had forgotten why he it is necessary, it is difficult to understand ....
  8. Badinger
    Badinger 15 August 2017 14: 27
    +1
    there is no opposition in the country, all the FSB agents.
    there was one ... his example is another science ...
  9. Barbulator
    Barbulator 15 August 2017 15: 43
    +2
    Sergey Udaltsov:
    "Bulk is not my president."

    Seryozha, and you are not my president; like Messrs. Yavlinsky, Kasyanov, and see further on the list http://5kolonna.info/5kolonna-v-rossii-spisok/. Those. that fifth column, which, in spite of its seeming education, businesslikeness and the highest unprincipledness, has already done everything to harm Russia.
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 18 August 2017 01: 33
      +1
      Quote: Barbator
      Seryozha, and you are not my president; as well as Messrs. Yavlinsky, Kasyanov and see further on the list

      And not mine either. I will vote for a person with an economic and legal higher education who has experience in public administration, whose competence is confirmed by a dissertation on a profile topic. Gorlopanov and Krasnobaev, stupid and arrogant from the Ukrainian side, we already see on the talk shows of Russian channels. All adventurers were still lacking in power.
      1. would
        would 18 August 2017 12: 50
        0
        for a person with an economic and legal higher education, who has experience in public administration, whose competence is confirmed by a dissertation on a profile topic.


        However, there have always been plenty of such people in the government, and we do not just see the results of their activities, but feel them in our own skin. Maybe it's worth a vote once for the turner Vasya? Well, since all these economists and lawyers have been pushing the country into the abyss for many years in a row, then maybe the turner will succeed?
        1. Baloo
          Baloo 23 August 2017 19: 43
          +1
          Quote: rait
          for a person with an economic and legal higher education, who has experience in public administration, whose competence is confirmed by a dissertation on a profile topic.


          However, there have always been plenty of such people in the government, and we do not just see the results of their activities, but feel them in our own skin. Maybe it's worth a vote once for the turner Vasya? Well, since all these economists and lawyers have been pushing the country into the abyss for many years in a row, then maybe the turner will succeed?

          The less information and knowledge, IT IS EASIER ABOUT EVERYONE TO JUDGE.
  10. ism_ek
    ism_ek 15 August 2017 16: 04
    +3
    The author is lying. Udaltsov pleaded not guilty, and therefore served his full term. Unlike Navalny, Udaltsov has a program. There is one problem. No sponsors. Under socialism and the nationalization of industry, no one gives money :)
  11. parusnik
    parusnik 15 August 2017 16: 25
    +1
    The operation of the party in power, it must be noted, was five points
    ..It’s for sure ... But Udaltsov discredited himself, no, not a prison term, as N. Makhno said in his novel “Walking through the agony” -I was chained, thrown onto a cement floor, so revolutionary fighters are forged, so that got in touch with the liberals ... Why is there such a leader who is thrown right and left ... Udaltsov, the "dead leader" ... Uncle "Sue" claps his hands in joy, less than one competitor ...
  12. Analyst 1973
    Analyst 1973 15 August 2017 16: 31
    +3
    He must be treated in the fool, along with the rest ovoid! An obsession, to overthrow something and make it so that it would be as it should be! As it should be, they do not know, but certainly not like it is now. And now it’s bad, but it will be good! But if it gets worse, although there is nowhere worse, it will become clear that it has become worse and then it will be necessary to make it better! bully
    How do you like this program, can I also apply for the President? Although I have a criminal record, but these are trifles, I will make it so that it would be imperceptible! wink
  13. Analyst 1973
    Analyst 1973 15 August 2017 21: 36
    0
    Quote: Badinger
    there is no opposition in the country, all the FSB agents.
    there was one ... his example is another science ...

    What is his opposition?
  14. Analyst 1973
    Analyst 1973 15 August 2017 21: 40
    +2
    Quote: ism_ek
    The author is lying. Udaltsov pleaded not guilty, and therefore served his full term. Unlike Navalny, Udaltsov has a program. There is one problem. No sponsors. Under socialism and the nationalization of industry, no one gives money :)

    Let the banks rob for the sake of revolution, as Koba (Stalin) did, or is there a darling?
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 18 August 2017 01: 35
      +1
      Quote: analyst1973
      Let the banks rob for the sake of revolution, as Koba (Stalin) did, or is there a darling?

      Learning is never too late. Stop fooling around. A person must have a craft that will always feed him. A cormorant in the squares of Moscow is not a lot of intelligence.
  15. would
    would 18 August 2017 12: 47
    +1
    Udaltsov said that he considers the forces with which he once tried to go shoulder to shoulder as possible provocateurs acting exclusively within the framework of the concept of splitting the opposition movement.


    Just facts for reflection: Udaltsov is actually being jailed for organizing mass riots. And not only him. At the same time, Navalny who participated in the riots shoulder to shoulder with Udaltsov ... does not even pass as an accused in the same case. Did he sit in a strike shoulder to shoulder with Udaltsov? I sat. Did you organize the march of millions together with Udaltsov? Organized. But Udaltsov is being imprisoned, and there are no complaints against Navalny, they only formally searched him. And that’s all.

    And so look at all the matters regarding Navalny. Everywhere after committing for what others are actually imprisoned, Navalny gets off with a maximum condition, and sometimes the prosecutor’s office previously requiring a real conclusion now requires a suspended sentence! In the framework of Russian law enforcement practice, this is nonsense! And Aleksey at that time, as a spellbound man, comes out of all the troubles exactly so pure that he would have the image of a fighter with the regime and the opportunity to continue to carry out political activity for which his partners and associates are being imprisoned, and not himself.

    Draw conclusions hi
  16. Baloo
    Baloo 23 August 2017 19: 45
    +1
    Quote: rait
    And Aleksey at that time, as a spellbound man, comes out of all the troubles exactly so pure that he would have the image of a fighter with the regime and the opportunity to continue to carry out political activity for which his partners and associates are being imprisoned, and not himself.

    Like a partisan detachment with a traitor? very similar to bait fishing, although I'm not a fisherman.
    1. would
      would 24 August 2017 07: 13
      +1
      Type. Or it can be called a “mole” or “provocateur” that is, a person who works for power and must split all the opposition that can be split, and those that can’t be collected and given for “eating” as it was for example on Bolotnaya. The term of 3-4 years discourages many from engaging in political activities.