Leonid Ivashov: in New York very afraid of Medvedev's resignation

229
Leonid Ivashov: in New York very afraid of Medvedev's resignation


2 August, the new US law on anti-Russian sanctions was commented by Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev. According to him, he puts an end to the hope of improving relations between Moscow and Washington and indicates the beginning of a full-fledged trade war against Russia. According to him, “the hope of improving our relations with the new American administration is the end”.



“The Trump administration has shown complete impotence, in the most humiliating manner, transferring executive authority to Congress. - Russian prime minister wrote in his Facebook.

The Prime Minister is confident that relations between the Russian Federation and the United States will be extremely tense, regardless of the composition of the Congress or the president’s personality, and the sanctions regime will be maintained for decades, unless “some kind of miracle happens”.

It is a pity that Mr. Medvedev, obviously, did not read the works on the basics of geopolitics, although he was not only the prime minister, but even the president, did not listen to the opinion of geopolitical and geo-economics experts who talked about the eternal enmity on the part of the United States and the Anglo-Saxon world to Russia . This relationship is inherent in the law derived by Halford Mackinder, Alfred Mahan and others, which is based on the eternal opposition of the centers of maritime and continental civilizations. This is the law of fundamental dualism - the main law of geopolitics. The essence here lies not in the fact that some are good, the second are bad, but the fact that continental peoples live as a product of their labor, and the sea peoples, Anglo-Saxon above all, have emerged as a civilization living in a way of extraction. Her representative goes to extract first clams and fish, then islands, then colonies. And the view of the Anglo-Saxons on Russia-it is a look like the prey. Admiral Mahan’s “Continental Anaconda Strategy” formulates that whoever controls Russia controls Eurasia, who controls Eurasia, controls the fate of the whole world. That is, the center of world domination is laid precisely in Russia. Our country is interesting to opponents both as the territorial basis of the planet, and as a different meaning of life, and as an object of extraction for the Anglo-Saxon world. This is the root cause of what is happening, and not in the ideology, economic model, and so on. Such ideas were implemented by the United States and Britain history our relationship, starting in the second half of the XIX century. The Americans recognize Russia and speak on equal terms (without canceling their mean secret strategies) only when Russia is equivalent to the United States. There can be no other. When we are weak, we are the object of their prey. And the phrase by Brzezinski: “Russia is the prize for the winner in the Cold War” confirms that the United States has long viewed us as property.

Why are Americans now tightening rhetoric and sanctions? Because Russia is coming out of submission. Until the last years, we obediently submitted - in personnel matters, in the economy, and in ideology. Although there is no ideology of it, the state ideology is not stipulated or even prohibited by the Constitution, but the liberal ideology has actually been implanted, it is present everywhere, permeating all branches of government. As long as all of this meekly endured, they even slapped our presidents with encouragement. Today in the West they see that Russia, firstly, is turning towards the East, as the era of the East and the era of decay of the West are approaching. Secondly, trying to portray something independent in foreign policy. That is why today what is happening is happening.

Now Medvedev, a fan of the "reset", has received his sight and exclaimed: "The hope of improving our relations with the new American administration is the end ... Russia has been declared a full-fledged trade war ... The sanction regime is codified and will continue for decades if some miracle does not happen." But Medvedev and not only he were obliged to know all this and accordingly plan for preemptive actions of the Russian authorities. It is the fault of the rulers that, on the one hand, they seem to condemn the Americans, solve their maneuvers, but, on the other hand, follow the usual liberal course, and not the course of planning and strategic development of the country. I would like the words, these conclusions (which smart people wrote to Medvedev, or he himself came to this), followed by concrete actions, and not running with a hat in a circle behind handouts in the form of investments.

What measures does Medvedev himself talk about? Quote from Dmitry Anatolyevich: “What does this mean for us? We will calmly continue work on the development of the economy and the social sphere, will deal with import substitution, solve the most important state tasks, relying, first of all, on ourselves. We have learned to do this in recent years. ” And in the summary, the crown Medvedev's phrase in the style of “There is no money, but you hold on” still sounded: “Sanctions are meaningless. We can handle. The question arises: have we really learned to do something in recent years, or is Medvedev giving what he wants to be true and in fact we just have to learn everything he said if we want to survive?

I will refer to the speech of the Prime Minister of the Government of Russia Mikhail Fradkov from 2005. He also said about the same thing that Medvedev says today, calls for development, concludes that if we do not learn new models of the economy, do not switch to new technologies, we will pump oil and gas for foreign companies in a torn sweatshirt and we’ll leave behind forever. And now let's take a look at the December 2016 message from the president to the Federal Assembly. He says the same thing, adds only the word "digital" to "economy", again the calls "we need to move." That is, for 11 years from the moment of Fradkov’s speech and before the president’s message, practically nothing was done in the economy. Even gas processing complexes have not been built, the most powerful complexes that Iran created during the period of sanctions and now not only sells gas abroad, but sells it in the form of polymer materials. We did not learn to do this. We did not build new oil refining complexes in order not to drive crude oil abroad, but high-tech oils and other liquids. Here, if a breakthrough is indicated somewhere (as in aviation industry), then this is not a systemic breakthrough. They declared Superjet 100, collected 85% of the components and assemblies of Airbus and Boeing, we pass them off as our aircraft, we are proud to sign contracts, but the aircraft industry as a system dies. Today, almost all sectors of the economy are degrading. We do not switch to high technology.

Therefore, Mr. Medvedev should resign with repentance and leave. To give an opportunity to promote our industry on already modern models to those who are able to do it. Medvedev and his government are not capable. They have completely proved their helplessness, they are successful only in filling their own pockets and in ruining the people. To fill the budget, the government does not develop cost-effective production models, but increasingly shifts fiscal programs and any programs onto the shoulders of the common man. Take any area of ​​life support - and a communal, and water, and gas - everything becomes more expensive. This is what Medvedev learned with his government - to put pressure on the country's population, to transfer money from people's pockets to their own. Medvedev has neither a strategic program for the development of the country, nor even the technology for the development of individual industries.

It is clear that Americans are not afraid of Medvedev, Siluanov and Nabiullina - this is their employees, so to speak. Subjectively, maybe it is not so, but objectively - undoubtedly so. I do not think that they are afraid of Putin either, because all seventeen years of the presidency and premiership of Vladimir Vladimirovich as a whole also corresponded to the provisions of the Washington Consensus. But they fear the Russian spirit, where, as in an egg, the future development and grandeur of Russia is laid. Now I am in Crimea, in Partenit. This is a place with ancient legends and archaeological discoveries of the first centuries of Christianity. But in ancient times there were Tauroskifs there, beating warriors of the then West. Here they are afraid of - our ancient Christian ascetics and pre-Christian warriors. If you go up from Partenit and move a little to the west, there will be Gaspra, where Leo Tolstoy and Maxim Gorky lived. Their Russophobes are also afraid. If you move east, you will get to Koktebel, where Maximilian Voloshin lived, one of the creators of the greatest literature of the 20th century - Russian. Nearby, in the Old Crimea and in Feodosia, lived Alexander Green, dangerous for the “civilizers” by chanting dreams and a workshop making fun of the rich. In Koktebel on Mount Klementieva, the father of our cosmonautics Sergey Korolev began his great work. In Crimea, one can clearly see the greatness of the Russian genius, as it is concentrated in a small area. This is the genius and fear. And all further efforts of the same United States, as the avant-garde of the West, will be aimed at suppressing our scientific, artistic, and other genius. They are afraid of Russian cosmism, Russian aspiration, a powerful leap, which is accomplished when such an idea of ​​development is advanced, for which it is worth developing. We need to know why to live - to rebuild the world, as it was during the years of socialism, the first to reach cosmic heights. To do something that is interesting, important and useful for all mankind. Indicate even the direction of human development. This Russian dimension of ours, of course, is alarming in the West.

I remember 1999 for a year and a meeting with William Perry, who just left the post of US Secretary of Defense. I reproached him: “You are not rationalists, although they call you that. Russia today is weak. And you are driving NATO to our borders, launching a high-precision program weapons. What does this mean? After all, you understand that Russia is not a rival to you now. ” And he suddenly said the following phrase: “I don’t consider myself to be the best expert on Soviet history, I’m just doing all my scientific life, but I also have black holes in your history. I do not understand the period from 1921-th to 1941 year. Your country has made such a breakthrough, like no other people in the history of mankind ”. This is what they fear.

And, of course, today at the tactical level in the medium term, Washington and especially in New York are very afraid that Mr. Medvedev will be overthrown from his post. That Putin is also moved, and people will really come with Russian cosmism in their hearts. Therefore, I do not exclude that the article by Medvedev was written or initiated precisely from the United States, so that he would remain for a long time chairman of the government, ruin the country and serve the interests of the United States with his chums.

To sum up, in the article Medvedev has a message for internal use: “America called us an enemy, we see all this, we understand everything, we don’t close our eyes, we will act”. And for external use, the key phrase: “We will calmly continue the work on the development (read: degradation - L. I.) of the economy and social sphere”. These words betray the fear of Medvedev and his ilk before any real changes. Be gentlemen overseas, be calm. We will say harsh words, but we will act as you wish, as you please.
229 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    12 August 2017 15: 07
    It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?
    1. Alf
      +52
      12 August 2017 15: 31
      Quote: vlad007
      It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?

      And if you look, but not in your environment, but look around? The fact is that in order to seek a replacement, you need to change yourself, but neither Putin nor the government intend to do this.
      1. +3
        April 4 2018 18: 15
        ... but neither Putin nor the government intend to do this.

        They asked Putin about a reshuffle in the government, and said he would work on it. 18 years working on Russia and its people .... am In 12, Ivashev was a presidential candidate, he was brazenly pushed off the track. They knew he would win the election. I was hoping he would run at 18 .... Sorry. sad Zyuganov had to expose Ivashev, but ...
    2. +28
      12 August 2017 15: 34
      Quote: vlad007
      It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?

      After such an article, I see no other candidate besides Ivashov, I suppose a person with "Russian cosmism" by his own definition, who sees through and through and can solve all the accumulated problems in our economy.
      And his right hand is the “land sailor” Sivkov, with “his planetary thinking and strategic plans” - a ready-made Minister of Defense in the Ivashov’s government ... soldier
      They like Minin and Pozharsky will save Russia ...
      1. +3
        12 August 2017 17: 59
        Quote: ranger
        ..I don’t see any other candidate besides Ivashov, who sees through everyone and can solve all the accumulated problems in our economy.
        And his right hand is the “land sailor” Sivkov, with “his planetary thinking and strategic plans” - the ready-made Minister of Defense in the Ivashov’s government.
        They like Minin and Pozharsky will save Russia ...
        laughing Bravo! Top line of jokes for today? laughing
        fool
        I remember 1999 year and meeting with William Perry, who had just stepped down as US Secretary of Defense. I rebuked him: “You are not rationalists, although they call you that. Russia is weak today. And you are moving NATO towards our borders, launching a precision weapons program. What does this mean? After all, you understand that Russia is not your rival right now ”
        fool
      2. 0
        12 August 2017 18: 01
        Hallelujah! Yes! These are those who will not let you down!
      3. +47
        12 August 2017 23: 53
        Put your irony in the ass. I do not like when the old people from the General Staff are offended ...
        I would appoint Glazyev. I bet Ivashev would not mind ...
        1. +7
          13 August 2017 07: 15
          +500. Tongue removed.)
        2. +2
          18 August 2017 18: 37
          Glazyev from the same shobla gaydarochubaysova - nothing will change in essence, and without it anyone will put the same state-owned capitalism. Now 70% of ownership in the country belongs nominally to the state, but at the same time, social stratification is only increasing. The introduction of tight binding of the RFP of managers and workers has been slowing down for more than 10 years and will continue to slow down until the brake pads are erased ... but it will be too late - already now the people are starting to send power and in the 18th year it could very much happen surprise ...
      4. +29
        14 August 2017 13: 03
        Whatever the case, but neither Ivashev nor Sivkov hide their names! But what is behind your nickname.?
        It’s time for Medvedev to leave, and the article is correct!
        1. mvg
          +1
          14 August 2017 23: 56
          Have you read Sivkov’s articles? There, a man is not only of a near mind, he still doesn’t “dry out”, and he doesn’t have an education, otherwise he would never flaunt what he paints ... There is a clinic, in the finished version.
    3. +19
      12 August 2017 15: 39
      Quote: vlad007
      and whom to put?

      Is Russia poor in smart heads?
      1. Alf
        +30
        12 August 2017 15: 43
        Quote: Smog
        Is Russia poor in smart heads?

        Russia is rich, but the fact is that if you find such people, your own stupidity, incompetence and outright betrayal of our fellow government will be very clearly visible.
        1. +35
          12 August 2017 16: 59
          I absolutely agree with you - "Woe from Wit" !? Remember, when the St. Petersburg group gave Sobchak and his comrades in the ass to the “great democrat and liberal” and elected captain 1st rank Yakovlev as their mayor, Peter immediately blossomed. cleansed of dirt and filth and again became the Royal City of Petrov! True, the "golden plumbing" to Yakovlev this "Hercules feat" sideways came out ?! I believe that if this "maneuver" is made with DAM. then the "hero" will repeat the fate of Matrosov? True, Medvedev once declared in my native Magnitogorsk at the ER forum (I heard it with my own ears and saw it personally in my fatherland). "that we. say. we will not allow a new Russian revolution"? However, "from prison and sumy" as well as from ... the revolution in Russia, there is no need to renounce! This activity is not grateful - WAKE DAMAGED?
          1. +4
            13 August 2017 17: 25
            Come on, if you will sculpt a savior from Yakovlev. Already from what, but Peter didn’t get rid of contamination with his arrival. It’s just that crime was fought, organized, and decided that organized proteges were needed. No more.
            1. +4
              13 August 2017 17: 28
              Do you forget, My Inquisitive Friend, under whose rule Grad Petrov got the gloomy drive of Gangster Petersburg ?! Good luck and all the best!
          2. +3
            14 August 2017 19: 49
            Hello countrywoman! I am also from Magnitogorsk. You write everything right!
          3. +1
            14 November 2017 15: 43
            Yakovlev - scum. rare.
      2. +2
        16 August 2017 10: 10
        At the end, at least someone answered the question "who should I put?" Correctly! Smart head! True, another question arises: who is this?
      3. +1
        23 August 2017 21: 10
        In Russia, there are people capable of effectively developing our state. Among these, the current Minister of Defense of our Homeland S.K.Shoygu; the organizer of the anti-corruption fund A.A. Navalny; Yekaterinburg Mayor E.V. Roizman and not only them. However, the appointment of personnel to the most important posts in our country is carried out by the enemy, a vile scoundrel and a crook Putin. It was he who, fraudulently misleading the Russians with his false election promises, became in 2012 the president of our country. It was he who, for many years leading our country, dragged and holds it in accordance with one of the ultimate goals of the US DropShot plan, namely, in deep economic dependence on the outside world. The vile Putin deserves to be punished for the criminal offenses under Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Fraud" and under Article 275 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "High Treason".
        1. +10
          24 August 2017 03: 22
          You wrote the name Shoigu to disguise the other two?
    4. +3
      12 August 2017 16: 04
      Quote: vlad007
      It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?

      Well? ... Ivashova ...
    5. 0
      12 August 2017 23: 59
      Quote: vlad007
      It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?


      Surkov, as an option.
      1. 0
        17 February 2018 10: 10
        Quote: Anton Valeryevich
        Quote: vlad007
        It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?


        Surkov, as an option.

        No guys, first you need to put Kadyrov, and only then managers.
    6. +3
      13 August 2017 06: 41
      Sobyanin, Sergey Semenovich
      1. 0
        13 August 2017 17: 31
        I believe that the best Chairman of the government would be ... a woman! And her name is Tatyana Alekseevna Golikova !!!
        1. +20
          13 August 2017 17: 43
          Quote: KudrevKN
          And her name is Tatyana Alekseevna Golikova !!!

          Are you talking about Madame Arbidol? —Christenko’s wife?
          Yes, there’s nowhere to put a test on it!
          This is clowning, when the financier becomes the Minister of Health and Social Development, by the way, the monetization of the benefits is her job.
          If such cadres are offered for the post of prime minister, then the world has gone mad! fool
          1. +1
            13 August 2017 18: 18
            Not at all, my Dear Friend! The best and faithful wives are obtained from former prostitutes. and prosecutors from thieves? Like the inquisitors of repentant heretics ?! Good luck to you! By the way. Tatyana Alekseevna is not gold to put her samples on, but just a beautiful and smart woman!
            1. +12
              13 August 2017 19: 01
              quote = KudrevKN] Not at all, my Dear Friend! [/ quote]
              well said))) Mutually! drinks [quote = KudrevKN] By the way. Tatyana Alekseevna is not gold to put samples on her, but just a beautiful and smart woman! [/ Quote]
              Her beauty is a matter of taste wink but the fact that our economy is in a deep pit ... well, Duc is the merit of such “wise guys.” [quote = KudrevKN] Good luck! [/ quote]
              Thank you, good luck to all of us over the next couple of years will be very useful! hi
              1. 0
                26 November 2017 23: 10
                You have to face it. Our economy has become so, because of a blow to it. And who knows how she would have stood under another government. We can all pour slops over others ....
                1. +4
                  26 November 2017 23: 12
                  Quote: Hottabych
                  You have to face it. Our economy has become so, because of a blow to it.

                  Who hit that? Martians? Orcs? Goblins?
                  1. +9
                    26 November 2017 23: 14
                    Quote: Stroporez
                    Martians? Orcs? Goblins?

                    Scab cutters wink
                  2. 0
                    26 November 2017 23: 49
                    In the 13th year it was already clear that there would be a mess. Everything is perfectly visible. Strong strangles the weak. The goal is to change the government. By the way, the same as many clerks here. Only, do these people understand what will happen if sufferers set the same goal ?!
                  3. 0
                    April 8 2018 14: 31
                    Quote: Stroporez
                    Who hit that? Martians? Orcs? Goblins?

                    As they kicked her at heart under Yeltsin, after the Gorbachev blow, she breathes ...
            2. Alf
              +6
              13 August 2017 21: 46
              Quote: KudrevKN
              clever woman!

              That would be her mind, so peacefully, she would not have a price.
            3. +1
              6 February 2018 13: 56
              With such logic, it’s not far to Berkova ...
          2. mvg
            +8
            14 August 2017 23: 59
            I agree. Health care and social protection is a bonanza. The most corrupt topics, after oil and gas.
            1. +7
              15 August 2017 09: 14
              It seems to me that you forgot one more direction of the cut - this is the cost of culture! This is where the blue growth is financed from the budget. They are ARTISTS, and they should not be disturbed by sucking the budget ...
              1. mvg
                +4
                15 August 2017 11: 35
                Culture is less, believe me. A lot. But payments to socially unprotected sections of the population ... They do not ask, they demand. Here's the GDP promised me an apartment, a car, a payment (on TV) ... and where is MY money? And nobody wants to work.
                There are a lot of them, socially separated, all from the state want something (require) and the amounts there are astronomical, but controlled. Khe-khe (((
              2. Alf
                +9
                15 August 2017 18: 46
                Quote: Dashout
                It seems to me that you forgot one more direction of the cut - this is the cost of culture! This is where the blue growth is financed from the budget. They are ARTISTS, and they should not be disturbed by sucking the budget ...

                Exactly. Recently there was a scandal with leading theatergoers in Moscow. Its essence could be expressed as follows: the State should pay all the expenses of the theater, give out salaries (not small), leave the profit of theaters to theaters, but should not interfere in the choice of productions, and, moreover, censor.
          3. +1
            28 January 2018 14: 37
            I support, as a minister, she and her cousins ​​“privatized” a significant part of the pharmaceutical market, scandals were on the construction of medical clusters, on the procurement of imported medical equipment. And now she heads the Court of Auditors, apparently a valuable shot for the authorities. The room is quiet, everything is fine. The personnel policy is built by the authorities on the principles of personal loyalty, clanism, nepotism, and enemy demands. But what about the thesis "there are no irreplaceable."
        2. +11
          14 August 2017 16: 04
          What the hell? How does Golikova differ from Medvedev (except for sexual characteristics, of course)?
          1. 0
            12 November 2017 17: 46
            Hair color?
        3. +1
          April 4 2018 18: 35
          Golikova Tatyana Alekseevna !!!
          laughing This is the one with a private cemetery behind you !? fool
      2. 0
        14 August 2017 19: 50
        Nope, will not pull yet! He is struggling to keep his fist in Moscow .... a little experience will not hurt him!
      3. +4
        15 August 2017 00: 02
        God forbid! Sobyanin Sergei Semenovich gets up in the long-suffering Mother See horseradish knows what, and then all this window dressing is given for masterpieces. Do you want to spread all over Russia ?!
    7. +26
      13 August 2017 07: 48
      And here the question is not only: Who to put? everything is much worse .. their rule completely destroyed any motivation for those who could not leave the country and, as a result, the decomposition of society in both social and ideological composition. And further ... if you give an example of 1921 -1941 and a tighter war .. there was not only a strong manager ... there was an IDEA AND AIM, uniting people into one society which moved the economy forward at such a pace. And now this will not work: the reason is a simple too big income gap for those who work for the most part and those who rule .. Daughter Peskova tried in the Crimea at a shipyard to shake that it was prestigious to work in shipbuilding such as Youth on Steamboat. the answer from the audience clearly made the mood clear: go Girl for 15000 rubles a month work for yourself, at this prestigious job .... And what next .. drive people to camps and engineers into sharashka ?? it doesn’t work out ... people once built the economy and to whom it then went to 5-10 people of known nationality .. And then I said the same thing to young graduate engineers: the answer is simple, why do I need to be an engineer at a factory ... I'm better I’m going to play football in the third league .. there a football player receives per month as much as an engineer does not earn per year .. that’s the whole economy
      1. 0
        14 August 2017 19: 53
        Sound reasoning, chirkani in PM, we’ll cry!))
    8. +1
      14 August 2017 19: 52
      In Russia, the population of 146 ml ........ no worthy?
      1. Alf
        +9
        14 August 2017 20: 41
        Quote: jaguar
        In Russia, the population of 146 ml ........ no worthy?

        In Russia, the population lives in the Kremlin and Novorizhka, the rest are electorates.
    9. +1
      20 August 2017 07: 12
      Using this logic, do not change anything, but wait until they select a candidate overseas!
    10. 0
      20 August 2017 14: 01
      Oh, at least Shoigu, or Kiriyenko - and among the other ministers and around there are enough sensible guys.
      1. +1
        12 November 2017 17: 49
        Quote: Blondy
        and among other ministers and around sensible guys missing.

        In the sense of a cut?
    11. +2
      17 February 2018 10: 05
      Quote: vlad007
      It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?
      To remove an iPhone is part of the problem, you need to remove the entire cooperative "lake" along with the guarantor. They have worn everything enough, it’s time and honor to know.
    12. The comment was deleted.
    13. 0
      29 August 2018 07: 09
      Quote: vlad007
      It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?

      it must be a military man
  2. +8
    12 August 2017 16: 01
    In New York, they are very afraid of the resignation of Medvedev And how are we "afraid!" wassat : but I also have black holes in your story. I do not understand the period from 1921 to 1941 Read history books, no way? Or the press of those years. Therefore, I do not exclude that Medvedev’s article was written or initiated from the USA, Good statement.
    1. Alf
      +5
      12 August 2017 16: 34
      Quote: VERESK
      : but I also have black holes in your story. I don’t understand the period from 1921 to 1941. Do not read history books, or the press of those years.

      One hundred percent American reads only what he needs for his life — rates, interest, prices. Something non-American and something that cannot be earned does not interest him. They don’t know their story, why should they know the history of their enemy.
      1. +8
        12 August 2017 19: 19
        Americans, they are very different, like Russians (residents of Russia of all nationalities). From dumb as a cork, to very erudite people. It was possible to communicate with both those and others. And all these bastards, such as EBN and others, are evaluated very differently.
      2. +2
        13 August 2017 07: 58
        Yes, not only the interest rate quotes ... he does not understand what it means to work for workdays, for 150 grams of bread, etc. - the camp economy and the great enthusiasm of the people and much more that was then. The American worker during the Second World War both received a high salary and continued. Without a dollar, nothing was done there .. neither in 1921 nor in 1945 and sow the day too
    2. +7
      13 August 2017 10: 17
      VERESK "In New York, they are very afraid of Medvedev's resignation And how are we" afraid! "
      I agree with you 100%.)))
    3. +5
      14 August 2017 16: 14
      Do you really understand everything about the period from 1921 to 1941? For example, do you know the answer to the question of how the industrialization of the country was carried out, and thousands (!) Of enterprises were built? In what textbooks is this written. There is such a scientist - Katasonov V. Yu. Today, I think, is the most competent specialist in Russia in economics and finance. But he also admitted that he could not find the answer to this question.
      1. +3
        14 August 2017 16: 17
        Hefty literate.So explain. We are waiting for the article. hi
      2. 0
        29 August 2018 07: 14
        Quote: Hefty literate
        There is such a scientist - Katasonov V. Yu. Today, I think, is the most competent specialist in Russia in economics and finance. But he also admitted that he could not find the answer to this question.

        Katasonov has a book - "Stalin's Economics" read it
    4. +1
      20 March 2018 00: 13
      the resignation of the bear. yes, in the Kremlin, you’ll fool everything and any resignation of iko-gundosikov will infuriate
  3. 0
    12 August 2017 16: 37
    Now Medvedev, a lover of the "reset", has seen his sight and exclaimed: "The hope of improving our relations with the new American administration is the end ..."

    Clarify: Now the fifth column in Russia has come to an end! We must remember whose lackey Medvedev will be. The old owner has left, but the new local Clintonoids are not needed. Glory to Trump, strengthening our sovereignty!
    1. +8
      12 August 2017 18: 52
      And whose servant is Medvedev? Is not Putin?
      1. +2
        12 August 2017 19: 02
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        And whose servant is Medvedev? Is not Putin?

        He is not a serf, but representative parts of the Russian elite.
        1. +7
          13 August 2017 07: 42
          Medvkdkv representative of the bourgeoisie, oriented to the west. Putin is a representative of security forces oriented to the interests of Russia. These are nominees of different clans and representatives of one clan cannot remove a representative of another without prior approval.
          1. Alf
            0
            13 August 2017 21: 50
            Quote: Boris55
            Medvkdkv representative of the bourgeoisie, oriented to the west. Putin is a representative of security forces oriented to the interests of Russia.

            Those. these representatives were initially directed against each other.
            Quote: Boris55
            and representatives of one clan cannot remove a representative of another without prior approval.

            Do you think that one clan will yield to another? How can they agree?
            1. 0
              14 August 2017 08: 15
              Quote: Alf
              Those. these representatives were initially directed against each other.

              This is the result of compromises between different clans.
              Quote: Alf
              How can they agree?

              When some have power, while others have money, they will agree.
              1. Alf
                +2
                14 August 2017 20: 36
                Quote: Boris55
                When some have power, while others have money, they will agree.

                That the results of the compromise are not very visible. The clear advantage of the Westerners.
                1. 0
                  15 August 2017 08: 16
                  Quote: Alf
                  The clear advantage of the Westerners.

                  The will of the people, constantly in the vast majority of those who vote for the western path of development, for United Russia, is sacred to both clans.
        2. 0
          29 August 2018 07: 16
          Quote: You Vlad
          He is not a servant, but a representative of a part of the Russian elite

          It’s not always the Elite that floats above
  4. +23
    12 August 2017 16: 41
    In the current situation, the country needs a completely different level of political will and a serious strategic plan, requiring, among other things, a radical personnel restructuring of the governing structures. First of all, this applies to the entire economic bloc. It is time to end the period of Putin’s "agreement" with the "Yeltsin family." The pro-Western liberal front should be “swept out” of all structures and there is no need to talk about dictatorship, censorship, etc. .. Who has not understood yet, a war has been declared and is going on to destroy Russia and its people as a civilization. Out of us purposefully they create outcasts, actually in the world, by the hands of the relevant organizations and structures, an atmosphere of intolerance and hostility to everything Russian is created. The country needs a tough, pragmatic course with emphasis on creating the most favorable socio-economic conditions in the country. It is impossible to “spin up” the economy to the required level with our current “Boston boys” of the Yeltsin-Clinton nest. Medvedev and Co. it is time to resign.
    1. 0
      12 August 2017 16: 49
      Quote: Nonna
      Medvedev and Co. it is time to resign.

      Or maybe they thought better of it and begin to work in the country? Medvedev made it clear that it was time for them to look for a master within the country.
      1. 0
        18 August 2017 06: 37
        why look for him, he is, you need to get rid of external hosts, and first of all, from who
        made it clear that it's time
    2. +13
      12 August 2017 17: 00
      I fully support. The problem of Russia is not in the people living in Russia, but in those who rule Russia, in its ruling class. Ivan the Terrible, to break the resistance of the boyars, it took the oprichnina. Without this, there was no way to deal with the ruling elite. To break the resistance of the traitors of Russia and Russia in the 17th century, the militia of Minin and Pozharsky was needed. Without this, Russia would not have survived and would have been defeated by internal traitors and Poles. In the 20-30s of the 20th century, Stalin needed a great purge, which provided the conditions for the consolidation of the people and the state during the greatest year of World War II.
      Now the Russian Guard has been created in Russia. I would like to hope that this is a tool that will allow us to clear the government of Russia from the traitors of the liberties ... of the robbers who have been robbing and selling Russia for 25 years.

      "People-State-Fatherland" is the slogan of every Russian patriot.
      1. Alf
        +9
        12 August 2017 17: 22
        Quote: The Truth
        Now the Russian Guard has been created in Russia. I would like to hope that this is a tool that will allow us to clear the government of Russia from the traitors of the liberties ... of the robbers who have been robbing and selling Russia for 25 years.

        But the National Guard is subordinate to whom? The brightest. To the one who himself has repeatedly said that he is a liberal. He will be from people like himself to clean Russia, yeah.
      2. DPN
        +5
        12 August 2017 20: 41
        Rosguard is the protection of GDP and no more, but HE is generally far from the people.
      3. 0
        15 November 2017 12: 52
        Correction ...
        MOTHERLAND - FREEDOM - PUTIN !!!
        National Liberation Movement - The ONLY sane answer to the question of what to do now! Replace Medvedev with "Lisina" or "Kabanova" - only to please the Endos with their stupidity as the Ukrainians did !!!
      4. 0
        29 August 2018 07: 17
        Quote: The Truth
        Now the Russian Guard has been created in Russia. I would like to hope that this is a tool that will clear state governance,

        Crop planting is such a tool
    3. +8
      12 August 2017 19: 23
      Quote: Nonna
      a strategic plan, requiring, among other things, a radical personnel restructuring of governing structures.

      Stalin at one time believed that: "Cadres decide everything." Then, from the 60s, the Japanese began to be guided by this principle, and it must be done, things didn’t go wrong then.
      1. +8
        13 August 2017 07: 20
        The Japanese had a state strategy, brilliantly worked out, which allowed the country, destroyed by war and atomic strikes, to create an outstanding economy and their recovery model would be correct to use, but not with the current rulers and the cabinet - everyone needs to be changed there, it's like animals in a zoo, used to they are fed, and in a competitive environment (that is, where you need to fight for life and get food), they’ll immediately become food
        1. +2
          18 August 2017 18: 55
          Oh, don’t talk about the “Japanese miracle”, it is implicated in the protectorate of the Merikos, who in exchange for sovereignty and bases on the islands gave them a preferential treatment in their market and a bunch of production licenses, even under such conditions the Japanese plowed 20 years of bread and water, before they have "meat" has grown. So this experience is not about us.
          1. 0
            12 November 2017 17: 55
            Quote: Skif100500
            Oh, do not talk about the "Japanese miracle", it is implicated in the protectorate of the Merikos

            You’ll be careful there with the truth, otherwise there will be enough especially exalted heart attack ...
            ..... or do some think that Marshall’s plan for Asia is not acceptable?
  5. +5
    12 August 2017 17: 20
    Take, for example, Shoigu! For what it does not undertake, everything at it regularly turns out! It doesn’t bazaar like some, but it does! Yes, and Rogozin is a man of business!
    1. Alf
      +13
      12 August 2017 19: 00
      Quote: manne mann
      Yes, and Rogozin is a man of business!

      Is Rogozin a man of business ??? He had already spoken so much that it wasn’t in a fairy tale to say, not a pen to describe. Even here, in VO, he was caught many times by the hand.
    2. +20
      12 August 2017 19: 03
      Rogozin is generally a young man. Especially if you forget some facts:
      1. Where did he start his watered. career
      2. Why did he crawl out of the water when the problem of the Vostochny spaceport arose
      3. The main thing is that we need to forget that his son is so successful and talented that from the youngest 26-27 years old he has held senior positions in not-so-small arms enterprises, and today he heads the IL concern. Well, definitely without a daddy's admin. resource made it ...
      1. +1
        13 August 2017 00: 00
        But what is not at the top for everyone? Prokhorov graduated from the university and ... the director of the bank ... You can call many ... Young talents always give us the way ...
        1. +2
          13 August 2017 10: 30
          So Prokhorov, as it were, does not hide the oligarch and his pro-Western views
      2. Alf
        +6
        13 August 2017 21: 53
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        Hey, we need to forget that his son is so successful and talented that from the youngest 26-27 seven years old he has held senior positions in not-so-small arms enterprises, and today he heads the IL concern. Well, definitely without a daddy's admin. resource made it ...

        4. And ask a question: How is Rogozin’s daughter going to become the director of a nature reserve in Crimea for more than 20 years, not working for a day in the natural industry, but successfully working in the financial industry, while having 40 (!) Offenses? Despite the fact that the old director, who sat in this position for 15 years, quietly "left" without explanation?
        1. +1
          12 November 2017 17: 57
          Quote: Alf
          And ask a question: How is Rogozin’s daughter going to become the director of a nature reserve in Crimea in more than 20 le

          Loves nature very much?
  6. +4
    12 August 2017 17: 38
    Quote: vlad007
    It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?

    Putin, of course. The option is worked out. laughing
  7. +15
    12 August 2017 17: 55
    Thank you for the article. Remember how we were selected by the heads of the defense ministries in the late 70s. I was personally checked for a year. And then, under my leadership, 45 enterprises with a 250th staff of specialists provided the country with military and military transport and consumer goods. The growth rate was at least 15% per year. The premiere will undoubtedly pick up. I have the honor.
    1. Alf
      +9
      12 August 2017 19: 03
      Quote: midshipman
      The premiere will undoubtedly pick up.

      Of course, they will pick up. The same. In order not to get out of the course and walk in the wake obediently.
    2. +5
      12 August 2017 19: 27
      Quote: midshipman
      The premiere will undoubtedly pick up

      Well, a holy place is never empty. It’s just that this will be a person like Primakov or Medvedev’s reincarnation, now it’s very not clear.
    3. +1
      15 August 2017 00: 07
      Why only defense? Whatever, but there was an intelligible personnel policy, there was a personnel reserve, restrictions, requirements, etc., etc. You can remember (there is still someone)
  8. +11
    12 August 2017 18: 08
    The article is long, but you can understand it from the first lines. Medvedev is weak, and we ourselves know that. The question is different, why is this weak government still at the helm (we don’t touch the Ministry of Defense and Foreign Affairs. Thanks to them!) To be honest, their place is in sunny Magadan on apple plantations.
    1. Alf
      +12
      12 August 2017 19: 04
      Quote: vfqjh
      To be honest, their place in sunny Magadan on apple plantations.

      And where is the place of the one who formed this government and whose work is satisfied?
    2. +3
      12 August 2017 19: 30
      Quote: vfqjh
      why is this weak government still at the helm

      In fact, the role of the Central Bank in our present cramps is much more substantial than this current worthless government.
  9. +1
    12 August 2017 18: 14
    Leonid Ivashov, too, Medvedev interferes, however, as the bulk! And is it not from one center that they receive a salary? patriot, the second fighter against corruption what We now need strong power once, and he wants paralysis of power ...
    1. +12
      12 August 2017 19: 01
      What is the strong power?!? One must be a uniform blind man in order not to see that Medvedev is a complete insignificance at the helm of power. He completely does not understand why he is sitting there. Some papers are brought to him, he reads them with a smart look and gives instructions to execute. Its limit is a senior lecturer of the department somewhere in the university. Not even a boss. He does not see and does not understand the problems of the country, and they are the sea and they urgently need to be addressed. But he is a random person in power and has no idea what to do and how. Putin’s patient position is surprising, apparently playing in contrast.
      1. +1
        12 August 2017 19: 07
        Quote: VIT101
        But he is a random person in power and has no idea what to do and how.

        Is this your opinion? Or was it provided to you by the media feel
        1. +1
          13 August 2017 00: 11
          Do you get everything first hand?
      2. +3
        13 August 2017 00: 11
        I wouldn’t speak like that about the head of government ...
        Not very good man’s will, yes. But a strong-willed prime minister will be a rival to the president. Russia tear at the top may not survive ...
        Medvedev must be aimed at solving the problems of legal proceedings and this entire sphere, he will succeed ... And appoint an economist or technocrat as head of government and set him a clear task.
        1. Alf
          +4
          13 August 2017 22: 01
          Quote: MstislavHrabr
          Not very good man’s will, yes.

          There was one not very strong man in the history of Russia, how did this end for the empire in 1917?
          Quote: MstislavHrabr
          But a strong-willed prime minister will be a rival to the president. Russia tear at the top may not survive ...

          The first person should always endure near the second person who may object to him. This is the law of a successful ruler. Example-Stalin and Molotov.
          Quote: MstislavHrabr
          Medvedev must be aimed at solving the problems of legal proceedings and this entire sphere, he will succeed ..

          Do not. Everything is so corrupt and rotten there that the little bear simply breaks everything because of its stupidity.
          1. 0
            27 November 2017 00: 16
            No need to compare - the form of government under Stalin and now. At one time, we have already changed this form.
      3. +5
        13 August 2017 07: 26
        Absolutely, Medvedev does not understand at all what the modern economy is and what industries urgently need to be made competitive for a radical change in its state. Not a single branch of the country received a single new enterprise during his reign. Maybe only mining plants have built, and then this is private capital. You look at what is happening in the aircraft engine industry and other industries, or the Stone Age, or not a single domestic processing center or technology - it is completely dependent on the technologies and machines of the West and the Chinese. And in other sectors the same ..
        1. +1
          18 August 2017 19: 12
          And what about the failure of 30+ years in machine tools can be overcome in five years? -)) Nobody was itching until the cock pecked. Now, hosh is not hosh, but you have to buy from the Chinese, and use outdated machines, and buy very expensively from sworn "partners" ...
      4. Alf
        +2
        13 August 2017 21: 56
        Quote: VIT101
        Putin’s patient position is surprising, apparently playing in contrast.

        It's right. After they kicked out the iPhone, they would very soon begin to ask Shyukolov a question - why is nothing changing?
    2. +6
      12 August 2017 19: 06
      And in my opinion, just now, and paralysis of power, just some kind of stagnation. To have strong power, strong leaders are needed. Peter the Great and Stalin - these are strong leaders. The article says that even the Americans were surprised at how Stalin raised the country in 20 years. Here is an example of how to work.
      1. 0
        12 August 2017 19: 10
        Quote: Fan-Fan
        And in my opinion, just now, and paralysis of power, just some kind of stagnation.

        This is not stagnation, but a direct confrontation with the West and the ruble did not fall by itself smile And we hold on if what!
        1. Alf
          +6
          13 August 2017 22: 06
          Quote: You Vlad
          This is not stagnation, but a direct confrontation with the West and the ruble did not fall by itself

          And the ruble fell not only because of the actions of the West, but also because of the inability and frankly treacherous actions of our leadership. It is necessary to join the WTO without a competitive industry and agriculture. By the way, who signed the entry of Russia into the WTO? Is it a frantic patriot?
          1. +1
            14 August 2017 05: 58
            Quote: Alf
            It's necessary to join the WTO

            When we entered the WTO, we had already given up our market before that! But we could not sell our products to the West, the WTO gave this right.
            Quote: Alf
            And the ruble fell not only because of the actions of the West, but also because of the inability and frankly treacherous actions of our leadership.
            Well, for sure! Everything was stable, as soon as the sanctions were imposed here, we immediately dropped the ruble by not skillful actions wink
            1. Alf
              +5
              14 August 2017 20: 39
              Quote: You Vlad
              But they could not sell their products to the west, the WTO gave this right.

              What exactly gave? Even Mr. Mordashov, one of the main lobbyists of Russia's accession to the WTO, admitted that nothing has changed after the entry.
            2. +2
              15 August 2017 00: 16
              So "you don’t need to think about entim," we don’t sell to the West. That's when a country has a stable and capacious domestic market - then its economy is truly stable. To this, in my unenlightened opinion, one must actively and intelligently strive.
              1. Alf
                +4
                15 August 2017 18: 39
                Quote: odnodvorets
                That's when a country has a stable and capacious domestic market - then its economy is truly stable. To this, in my unenlightened opinion, one must actively and intelligently strive.

                For the domestic market to become capacious, it is necessary to “slightly” increase the level of income of the population. And here with this at our effective managers plugging. If you pay a lot to the worker, then yourself, your beloved, will have little left. In addition, why pay 60-70 thousand, if it is possible to create conditions under which the worker will work for 20-25 pieces.
      2. +1
        18 August 2017 19: 25
        And what happened after these "strong leaders" in the country? A strong leader is not afraid to keep such strong comrades-in-arms next to him ... That after Peter, that after Stalin - a bummer and no continuity of politics. Nikita Kukuruzny broke the whole system and the country rolled by inertia until, under Len Brovenosny, all the steam finally went off the whistle ... It's not only a person in power, but an idea that does not break away from reality. The USSR did not die in the 90s, but when the words finally parted ways, no one came up to defend the system that rotted when no one could move anything in this quagmire within its quagmire. And now the power is rushing on the same rake - they talk about the social obligations of the state, and they themselves are inflating social inequality to the extent that even in purely capitalist countries have long been gone.
    3. +3
      12 August 2017 19: 07
      I am also dissatisfied with Medvedev! Where are my honestly earned State Department dollars?
      1. +1
        12 August 2017 19: 18
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        I am also dissatisfied with Medvedev! Where are my honestly earned State Department dollars?

        You honestly have the wrong audience, so there’s nothing to pay you for! Your maximum to go to the swamp ... I don’t know how much they pay passionate request
        1. +11
          12 August 2017 21: 01
          That is, there are only two extremes for you in this matter? Or "love of Medvedev" or "marsh"?
          But what about the fact that I have a brain and I, with fierce dislike for Navalny and KO, consider Medvedev and the liberal part of the government - compradors?

          Something in the room smelled of kvas patriotism ...
          1. 0
            13 August 2017 02: 51
            Quote: Black_Jacket
            That is, there are only two extremes for you in this matter? Or "love of Medvedev" or "marsh"?

            Where did I write this? belay However, you are a dreamer! I believe that the resignation of the government at the moment will greatly weaken our position!
            Quote: Black_Jacket
            Something in the room smelled of kvas patriotism ...

            Exactly .. We will take away Medvedev and immediately life will improve fellow
            1. Alf
              0
              13 August 2017 22: 08
              Quote: You Vlad
              I believe that with the resignation of the government at the moment, weaken our position!

              And when Putin’s ministers changes like gloves, doesn’t it weaken?
          2. 0
            15 August 2017 00: 19
            Well, this is debatable, at least. As for the points of view, the extreme ones are always the most simple and understandable. The middle (read - balance) is always difficult both in terms of choice and in terms of understanding.
            1. Alf
              +1
              15 August 2017 18: 40
              Quote: odnodvorets
              Well, this is debatable, at least. As for the points of view, the extreme ones are always the most simple and understandable. The middle (read - balance) is always difficult both in terms of choice and in terms of understanding.

              Is there anything to say in the case?
  10. +6
    12 August 2017 18: 34
    In fairness, it’s worth saying that Putin also strove for good relations with the United States, and even now in Syria and on many issues, he cooperates with “partners”, it’s strange for me personally when Medvedev is scolded, and nobody sees Putin’s policy point blank. Putin, for example, was also the prime minister, and what were the changes in the economic bloc? And honestly, he has been running the country for 17 years, and if politics (foreign / domestic) would not suit him, he would have changed everything a long time ago, and as we say Medvedev = Putin, the media want to make a "scapegoat" (phraseological unit) then let it remain on their conscience.
    1. Alf
      +12
      12 August 2017 19: 06
      Quote: Aleksandr21
      And honestly, he has been running the country for 17 years, and if politics (external / internal) would not suit him, he would have changed everything a long time ago,

      1. 0
        24 August 2017 16: 43
        Do not slander the troll!
        You clearly want the Gaidarites with the Yeltsinoids to return, and that everything would be like in the 90s again: “Bush’s legs”, not paying salaries and pensions, crazy racket and other benefits from the liberal degenerates with whom they treated the dying peoples of Russia ...
  11. +1
    12 August 2017 18: 49
    In New York, they are very afraid of the resignation of Medvedev
    TYPE AT UN. Ivashov’s article for the second time. and the second time in the name something is not right))))
    1. 0
      13 August 2017 00: 14
      Ivashov looks like an agent of influence but in.
  12. +6
    12 August 2017 18: 54
    -Much regret with the replacement of Medvedev, it’s unlikely that it will work out .... -Medvedev came forever .... -Sorry .. but this is so ... -Yes .., and Ivashov also won’t be able to “replace” ... .-a person he is already quite old (73 years) and can only afford such "analytical statements" ... And therefore ... -the situation in Russia is very complicated and requires specific radical measures .., and not elementary personnel shifts. .. -In short ...- where the curve will take ...
  13. +1
    12 August 2017 19: 14
    What else can you expect from Medvedev, this “Nanai boy”? It is a pity to Russia, but hope dies last.
    1. 0
      15 August 2017 00: 34
      Good day, Mr. Yesaul! Something about Russia so sad? What is awkward in our age? And it happened worse, but Russia, glory to you, Lord, - here it is.
      1. Alf
        +2
        15 August 2017 18: 48
        Quote: odnodvorets
        And it happened worse, but Russia, glory to you, Lord, - here it is.

        There were times worse, but there were no mean times.
  14. +4
    12 August 2017 20: 07
    Medvedev is no longer a boy for other people's combinations, followed by certain "elites". Remember the film about Nedimon, immediately Usmanov and Mikhas turned up their shoulder, and the Duma did not say anything in a single line, as did the leader of United Russia, the party in power.
  15. +4
    12 August 2017 21: 37
    I have long understood that Putin is trying to maintain order between the various elites and the security forces and is making concessions to someone. Or he is afraid to start hard cleanings, how he can lead to a hard split in the elite and in the security forces, or here is something else. But the fact that Putin is doing everything to make Russia strong and independent, I have no doubt, his methods are doubtful. Well, he knows better.
    1. +2
      12 August 2017 23: 13
      Putin openly told you: "Tightening the nuts leads to the 37th year ... We will not allow this."
      What other questions may be for him?
      1. 0
        13 August 2017 00: 15
        Only additions. ... We will not allow this .... now)
        1. Alf
          0
          13 August 2017 22: 10
          Quote: Grandfather Eugene
          Only additions. ... We will not allow this .... now)

          And then too. It’s a pity for myself, my beloved, and my friends too.
  16. +3
    13 August 2017 05: 53
    Leonid Ivashov is right, "First think about the Motherland and then about yourself!" They forgot this "golden law of patriotism ... Their" patriotism "is measured by the size of millions of capital in their pockets, in offshore, like the capital-sectarians of the careerists-saboteurs of the" Sociologists, their "state. service "which opened to the attention of the FSB. Also, Nikolai Patrushev Sov. Bez.a timely emphasized the issue of solidarity among the people, counteraction to modern anti-Russian propaganda, identification of obscurantist sectarians sowing hostility of ethnic communities in the population !!!
  17. 0
    13 August 2017 07: 36
    The article is PURE liberal. The author, as usual, compares the elephant and the bridge. Iran did and we do not. In addition to the plant, we have where to invest. The article was probably written by a schoolboy and not by a professional
    1. +5
      13 August 2017 08: 12
      How is it liberal? From the point of view of the economy and the sanction pressure that Iran has faced for 15 years, they have done everything absolutely right. For your information, neither gas nor oil does not create any added value, but only high-tech deeply processed products that are polymers and high-octane gasolines, for example, and it was they who moved them to the world market. And factories, namely machine building and machine tool building, urgently need to be restored and created, plus power machine building - there is the highest added value.
  18. +4
    13 August 2017 11: 12
    It seems that the Russian government is sitting paid by amers ...... bad people, in general! And purposefully harm, harm! On the one hand, they cause dissatisfaction with the authorities, (all of a sudden we, like Ukrainians, will run into the Maidan) And on the other, they will not allow Russia to develop so that the Anglo-Saxons have no competition in the world!
  19. +3
    13 August 2017 12: 27
    from what a stink ...
    So Dmitry Anatolyevich said to pensioners: "There is no money, BUT WE WILL FIND THEM. You - hold on."
    And SAME about sanctions. I do not care for them, really. People write that in factories, the number of orders since 2014 has grown. And that European businessmen easily bypass all these sanctions.
    So Medvedev D.A. - well done. He said that Putin is not speaking out loud. He warned, so to speak, on behalf of and on behalf of
    But Ivashov - would have already gone ... to the tundra - to catch hedgehogs. Tama is his place.
    1. Alf
      +4
      13 August 2017 22: 13
      Quote: Elena Khazova
      So Dmitry Anatolyevich said to pensioners: "There is no money, BUT WE WILL FIND THEM. You - hold on."

      Well, how did you find it?
      Quote: Elena Khazova
      And SAME about sanctions. I do not care for them, really.

      Have you been looking at price tags in a store for a long time?
      Quote: Elena Khazova
      People write that in factories, the number of orders since 2014 has grown.

      Only the salary did not increase, but in real terms decreased.
      Quote: Elena Khazova
      He said that Putin is not speaking out loud.

      And there’s nothing for Putin to say to the people.
      1. 0
        12 November 2017 18: 09
        Quote: Alf
        Well, how did you find it?

        So he did not lose ...
      2. +2
        18 November 2017 11: 09
        Your questions are pointless.
        On pensions - actually found - there were appropriate decisions made - on raising pensions several months ago.
        For the rest - there is a war, and consumers remain consumers - and although all at once and do not care to the country. Price tags are regularly observed, like everyone else. Normal price tags.

        LEN
  20. +2
    13 August 2017 13: 07
    Leonid Ivashov: In New York, they are very afraid of Medvedev’s resignation "...... Yes, Mitya’s deplorable deeds, one must live in fear and reverence with liberal convictions only in the outback, and not be prime minister ... .... if everything is correct, then he must leave, until he completely collapses and subjugates America, Russia ..... after all, even the EU began to refuse raw materials, natural gas, preferring American, liquefied, and shale gas .. ...... here the collapse of the entire economy is not far off .... it's time to think about a revolution in industry, so that everything is economically rational for Russia ...... and the Liber lnost is not right, landfill still carry
    1. +3
      13 August 2017 15: 09
      "Moscow continues to increase gas sales to European countries. In the first quarter of this year, they grew by 28,6% and reached 44,406 billion cubic meters," said Gazprom head Alexei Miller. Greatest increase in Russian gas consumption was made by Great Britain. For the first two half of the month of this year, London increased its purchases by 3,2 billion cubic meters (245,9%). France (+ 66,4%), Austria (+ 60,5%), Italy ( + 37,2%) and Germany (+ 37%). Following the results of this year, Moscow plans to sell 162,6 billion cubic meters of goal to the European Union God fuels. Given that other export destinations such unique dynamics is not observed, it can be stated that the Brussels rhetoric about "reducing the gas dependence" on Russia still does not fit with reality. " So who is refusing Russian gas there? wink
      1. 0
        14 August 2017 10: 07
        Before death, do not breathe .. (C). Exactly the same as you do not stock up for the future! So Trump pressed down tightly, they can not fight off American liquefied gas.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      13 August 2017 15: 30
      And about the "collapse of the economy" - so some (let's not point fingers) squealed three years ago - "Russia will not survive under sanctions! Russia will be bent during the year !!!" THREE YEARS HAPPENED! And what? The bend of Russia is again postponed indefinitely? laughing
      1. Alf
        +3
        13 August 2017 22: 15
        Quote: Sedoi Zmei
        And about the "collapse of the economy" - so some (let's not point fingers) squealed three years ago - "Russia will not survive under sanctions! Russia will be bent during the year !!!" THREE YEARS HAPPENED! And what? The bend of Russia is again postponed indefinitely? laughing

        And you, besides Moscow, look at other cities, especially the single-industry towns and the outback.
        1. 0
          14 August 2017 00: 02
          You might think that Moscow has an economy. Trading and storage facilities. Instead of moving people from Moscow to 10 towns around the entire perimeter of the border, everything is being done so that the metropolis remains in its role.
          1. Alf
            +2
            14 August 2017 20: 34
            Quote: Karen
            You might think that Moscow has an economy.

            It is possible that there are no INDUSTRIES in Moscow. But the fact that MONEY of the whole country is spinning in Moscow, I think, is undeniable.
            1. 0
              18 August 2017 19: 50
              Well, at least look at the statistics before writing ... 30% of the manufacturing industry for ~ 100 billion. rub. Stamps are not tired to lay out? Here education, science, medicine, defense industry ... and in your head everything about the money that is "spinning" here ...
        2. +1
          14 August 2017 11: 00
          Look! So what? I myself do not live far in Moscow! And I see that earlier we had three cars on the whole street, and now in EVERY YARD two or three! Nekhilo is poorer, however! laughing
          1. +1
            14 August 2017 12: 13
            Yes, this only says one thing - the people have no money. If there was money, then instead of cars thrown on the roadway, people would spend their time traveling around the world, eating in restaurants, and not buying rotten convenience foods, going to theaters and concerts. In short, lived a full life.
            1. +2
              18 August 2017 19: 53
              -))) "Full life." While traveling? -)) Call me, pzhst people in the world who at full strength eat in restaurants and instead of working travels around the world non-stop.
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        14 August 2017 07: 55
        Everything is so, if not for one BUT! The people are twice as impoverished!
        1. +1
          18 August 2017 19: 54
          What was measured at times?
          1. +1
            21 August 2017 18: 24
            going to the store and in terms of the cost of the same products! - putinoid
  21. +3
    14 August 2017 07: 11
    The article contains interesting thoughts, but in general in the spirit of Zyuganov: "All fields are overgrown with weeds!" , " Everything is lost! " . Only now I look out the window the whole yard in cars and new ones and no one dies of hunger and sweep the streets (attention shock for some - watered!).
  22. +1
    14 August 2017 07: 54
    This is a man! And there’s practically nothing to fix it !!!
  23. 0
    14 August 2017 08: 54
    For starters, it would be .. to take care of the population (its healthy part) ... we need new "kavchagin fodders" ... hungry-cold BUT wishing to work hard for the idea .... this same progress of 1921-1941, in fact, was built on enthusiasm population ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    14 August 2017 08: 57
    Quote: Seraphimamur
    The article contains interesting thoughts, but in general in the spirit of Zyuganov: "All fields are overgrown with weeds!" , " Everything is lost! " . Only now I look out the window the whole yard in cars and new ones and no one dies of hunger and sweep the streets (attention shock for some - watered!).

    and you didn’t pay attention to WHO WATERS .... in 9 cases out of ten .. this is Asian .... we are something we don’t really strive to be these same waterers
    1. 0
      14 August 2017 10: 03
      They water in the rain - the schedule, however ...
    2. 0
      18 August 2017 19: 57
      Sorry, but why should a person with an education (engineer, doctor, skilled worker, etc.) strive to be a watering person? We do not have enough specialists for all branches of activity.
  25. +3
    14 August 2017 10: 01
    The priority tasks facing the country (according to Glazyev) are the nationalization of the Central Bank, which Putin spoke of back in 2000, as well as the removal of the “fifth column” from the management of the economy and finances, which implies a serious purge of the Government of the Russian Federation. I completely agree with that! Glazyev at the Premiere!
    1. +2
      14 August 2017 13: 49
      Quote: Andrey Andreev_2
      The priority tasks facing the country (according to Glazyev) are the nationalization of the Central Bank, which Putin spoke about back in 2000 ...

      And what has Putin done in this direction over 17 years?) Glazyev and Katasonov say that we need to change the system radically, and not figures in the form of parrots repeating liberal mantras.
      1. Alf
        +2
        14 August 2017 20: 46
        Quote: Sovetskiy
        And what has Putin done in 17 years in this direction?)

        He was disturbed all the time. First, seven-bankers, then officials, then sanctions, then America. Now we are sitting and thinking, on whom our inability to blame, the enemies ended.
        1. 0
          14 August 2017 20: 59
          Quote: Alf
          He was disturbed all the time

          But what about the concept of a “referee (looking at the camera)”? Really did not cope?
          1. Alf
            0
            14 August 2017 21: 01
            Quote: Sovetskiy
            Quote: Alf
            He was disturbed all the time

            But what about the concept of a “referee (looking at the camera)”? Really did not cope?

            Judging by what is happening, no.
        2. 0
          12 November 2017 18: 13
          Then the moth on the horizon loomed ...
  26. +1
    14 August 2017 11: 07
    I haven’t read everything yet, shaw, again? the king is good, the boyars are bad?
    1. +3
      14 August 2017 11: 56
      Lastly, this "king" at least did something FOR Russia! Before him, the kings (humpbacked and drunk) only fell apart and handed out! And who has a bad memory - let him strain and remember kilometer-long lines, empty shelves in shops, half-year salary delays, coupons for goods and much more when the former kings! And he will answer his question - now nothing has changed ??? wink
      1. Alf
        +5
        14 August 2017 20: 50
        Quote: Sedoi Zmei
        empty shelves in stores,

        But now the shelves are breaking from products. In truth, one problem was drawn, it is unlikely that at least one product will now correspond to Soviet GOST. And, if simpler, one periodic table.
        Quote: Sedoi Zmei
        delayed salaries for half a year,

        Delays in salaries began in 2015, and even now there are far from isolated cases.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  27. +3
    14 August 2017 12: 07
    Balm for the soul! Youthful enthusiasm, depth of thought, a clear perception of reality. And most importantly, in which I 100% support the author - it’s time for Medvedev and Putin to remove from power and, most likely, put on trial for the collapse (I would even say - for the destruction) of the country.
  28. +3
    14 August 2017 18: 55
    Quote: vlad007
    It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?

    What did Comrade Stalin IV say about this? - "irreplaceable people ...".
    1. Alf
      +1
      14 August 2017 20: 51
      Quote: Andryukha G
      Quote: vlad007
      It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?

      What did Comrade Stalin IV say about this? - "irreplaceable people ...".

      "there are unchangeable."
      1. +1
        28 March 2018 06: 58
        There are no irreplaceable people. They are shot first.
  29. +2
    14 August 2017 21: 56
    A wonderful article, as they say: "not in the eyebrow, but in the eye!" As long as we have a liberal (80 percent, now!) Government, a government of "effective managers and shift workers", nothing good will happen in Russia. GDP must be based primarily on the "siloviki and techies." In the meantime, there is NO a clear program for the development of the country, there is NO a nationwide, unifying ideology, there is a pro-Western government (80%!) Of DAM, which is not going to do anything innovative, their task is to fill their pockets. GDP needs to be quickly rid of the nouveau riche, it’s time to think about the future of Russia, time is running out.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      12 November 2017 18: 15
      Quote: polkovnik manuch
      Until we have a liberal

      yes thieves just .... but the hand washes a hand ...
  30. +2
    14 August 2017 23: 05
    Quote: prok
    Balm for the soul! Youthful enthusiasm, depth of thought, a clear perception of reality. And most importantly, in which I 100% support the author - it’s time for Medvedev and Putin to remove from power and, most likely, put on trial for the collapse (I would even say - for the destruction) of the country.

    Shift the sins of a tagged and impoverished drunk on the shoulders of others. Compare with 90 years, and then we all "so sincerely loved." It’s not necessary to break and steal, but the organizers of the coup 91 must be judged.
    1. +1
      15 August 2017 13: 10
      Here I am about the same! What a short memory some people have! If only someone shouting now about the "collapse and destruction of the country" remembered life in this country BEFORE Putin, with a hunchback and a drunk !!!
      1. 0
        18 August 2017 20: 06
        Only 90-year-olds can remember anything about real life in the 40s. Those who are younger can only remember which kindergarten they went to. -))
      2. 0
        12 November 2017 18: 18
        Quote: Sedoi Zmei
        Here I am about the same! What a short memory some people have! If only someone shouting now about the "collapse and destruction of the country" remembered life in this country BEFORE Putin, with a hunchback and a drunk !!!

        Well then, it was still possible to go the other way and the state reserve was not sold, and specialists in science and industry were alive ...
    2. +1
      28 March 2018 07: 08
      Andropov brought Hunchback to Moscow. Yeltsin - Humpbacked. So the question is: which of the two "did not consider the future traitor", and which is actually the traitor?
      And the population of the RSFSR also tried when Yeltsin elected the first president of the RSFSR.
  31. +3
    15 August 2017 19: 12
    It is a pity that this is just an article by a respected general. If a referendum were to be held right now with only one question: “Do you approve of the activities of the Medvedev government?” - the result would please the author of the article!
    1. +1
      28 March 2018 07: 09
      If a referendum were to be held right now with only one question: “Do you approve of the activities of the Medvedev government?” - the result would please the author of the article!


      "It doesn’t matter how they voted, but it’s important how they counted." I. Stalin.
  32. +1
    15 August 2017 23: 41
    [/ Quote] Medvedev and his government are not capable. They have fully proved their helplessness, they are successful only in stuffing their own pockets and in ruining the people. To fill the budget, the government does not develop cost-effective production models, but more and more puts fiscal and any programs on the shoulders of an ordinary person. Take any sphere of life support - and a communal apartment, and water, and gas - everything rises in price. This is what Medvedev learned with his government - to put pressure on the population of the country, transfer money from people's pockets to their own. Medvedev has neither a strategic development program for the country, nor even technology for the development of individual industries. [Quote]
    It is said to the very point, and there is nothing to add to this.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  33. 0
    16 August 2017 10: 23
    Quote: vlad007
    It’s not a problem to remove Medvedev, but whom to put?

    There are sensible governors in Russia, and among the ministers, if you look closely, you can find a "replacement". The fact is that today any will be better.
    How much, of course, will be if the GDP combines both positions.
    1. +2
      16 August 2017 11: 14
      Looking at the inaction of GDP, a joke is always recalled.
      In a solid-looking Rest House, a man always sits at the piano and is silently dreamy. Well, after a week they ask him why he does not play, if he is so in love with the instrument? The answer put everything in its place: "I hate it when they play the piano ... That's why I sit down here so that others cannot do this."
  34. +1
    16 August 2017 12: 46
    What Ivashov says:
    1. "The era of the East and the era of attenuation of the West"
    That's right, only we do not get into the promising East for some reason!
    2. "We do not switch to high technology.
    Therefore, Mr. Medvedev should resign with repentance and leave. "
    And where does Medvedev, if the president is responsible for everything for us!
    If he did not like Medvedev, he would have thrown him out at one point.

    3. "But they are afraid of the Russian spirit, where, like in an egg, the future development and greatness of Russia is laid .... This Russian scale of ours, of course, is alarming in the West."
    Phrases for comfort, compensation for insolvency. We are not rich, but ideological and moral.
  35. +7
    16 August 2017 14: 21
    I read article 16.08.
    Judging by 558 pluses, the topic interests people.
    But not one of the commentators recalled that capitalism rules the country.
    As long as the oligarchs select the cadre of government of the country, and not the people, there will be no change.
    Such an impression is created that people did not read either Lenin or Marx.
    In order to return Stalin, it is necessary to restore the socialist system, and under capitalism, Stalin is the reincarnation of the Schistlgruber partigenoss. Who came to power with the help of the same oligarchs and world financial capital.
    You, comrades, have forgotten both the diamat and scientific communism. And about Marxist-Leninist philosophy, I’m keeping silent.
  36. +2
    16 August 2017 15: 38
    Zyuganov must be made prime minister!
    1. +1
      18 August 2017 20: 09
      Now put the one who scared in the 96th? -)) And what's the point?
    2. 0
      19 August 2017 00: 49
      In this case, the Internet will be closed, as it is now. And there will be something sorted, as in China ... But we are not Chinese - I, anyway.
  37. 0
    16 August 2017 17: 38
    Always respected General Ivashov.
    Another thing is alarming - increasingly, Aifonovich began to flicker in the media.
    A sure sign of renovation.
  38. +1
    17 August 2017 13: 44
    Medvedev has nothing to do with it. Anyway, Ivashov is credited with defeat in Afghanistan. Medvedev is a political zero, and, from contact with the unit, neither himself, nor, moreover, it does not turn into a ten. But the message of Ivashov to this unit is directed. Everyone knows "as it should," while forgetting that it is useful to know "how not." So, all these troubles about the country, nothing more than the desire to slam off an extra piece of the pie, since everyone cannot get it the same way. But what is the unit? You will not envy her. She mainly has ammunition carriers, and the direction of the main strike has to be determined by herself.
  39. 0
    18 August 2017 01: 12
    Ivashov commies - the last century. He does not understand a damn thing in economics, but exposes his Soviet ambitions. Where is your USSR? Why did he bend down? And because such Ivashovs stood at the mausoleum, waved to the working people with their arms, and did not know the economy ... Time will come, descendants
    To Putin, Medvedev, Nabiulina - as a united team, they will erect monuments, but you, comrade L.V., will not know ...
    1. +1
      18 August 2017 22: 53
      Sasha, my friend! wash your mouth and sweaty hands - stand in the corner!
      1. 0
        19 August 2017 00: 35
        When you have nothing to say, it’s better to shut up - you’ll be a smart guy ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      21 August 2017 13: 22
      "Sasha", whose slave will you be (from the above)? Do you want a cookie? so open the bread slicer wider, just rinse it first, and then something smells from you as if it were a latrine.
  40. +1
    18 August 2017 11: 34
    Quote: KudrevKN
    Not at all, my Dear Friend! The best and faithful wives are obtained from former prostitutes. and prosecutors from thieves? Like the inquisitors of repentant heretics ?! Good luck to you! By the way. Tatyana Alekseevna is not gold to put her samples on, but just a beautiful and smart woman!

    ..usually beautiful and not at all stupid women prefer another profession with currency related ..., khe, while young ..
  41. 0
    18 August 2017 23: 21
    That's how the chairman of the government will leave, tweeters with facebook will close, they will select the miraculous thinker of the sofa from the Internet ... what good gentlemen will we do ??? utter darkness will descend on our heads along with the broadcasting of the first channel ... where should the peasant go ???
  42. 0
    19 August 2017 09: 36
    There is an easy way to get rid of the rubbish accumulated in one place and start a new life there. This method was used in the USSR to solve the problem of what to do with a large amount of toxic radioactive waste. This liquid waste was loaded onto airplanes and sprayed over a large area. There is a simple way to decide how to attach decently to the mass gathered in Russia, which is not able for centuries to establish its life, to spray it evenly throughout the Earth. Such a mass of tens of millions of the USSR, which it was already possible to spray very well, was built and their chronic illness passed, grief from the mind and the problem was solved with fools, and the roads became not their concern
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. 0
    20 August 2017 07: 21
    The fact that something needs to be changed in the "Danish kingdom" has been known for a long time, but it remains to be determined when this will happen. I’m afraid that Putin will leave everything as it is until 2024, but then the country will really face a problem - who should it be? I am afraid that the issue will again be resolved in the course of the undercover struggle, since there will be nobody to choose from. This is the problem of strong personalities in history, since there is no equivalent replacement for them and the country is going downhill!
  45. 0
    20 August 2017 08: 58
    A country of fools .... If in the whole country there is only one single and unique one worthy to rule this country, then this is a country of fools ... Are all the rest not worthy? Is it high prestige to live in a country of fools?
  46. +1
    20 August 2017 09: 00
    "For the Fatherland, the greatest danger is not in the external mess, but in its own idiots." ... liberals and crap.
    Generalissimo Alexander Vasilievich Suvorov.
    All the troubles of Russia from the betrayal of power.
    It is necessary to cleanse Russia from the fifth column, especially in the government.
  47. 0
    20 August 2017 10: 09
    The article is interesting, but in the spirit of the Americans, who remove state leaders to make it easier to rob nations. Our problem is not working president and prnemier. It was long formulated by our great historian Klyuchevsky: “Our state machine is adapted for defense, not for attack. It gives us as much stability as it takes mobility. When we passively fight back, we are stronger than ourselves, because our inability still joins our defensive forces to understand our powerlessness, that is, our courage is increased by the fact that, frightened, we are not going to run away soon .... We are definitely a heavily armed knight of the Middle Ages. It is not the one who correctly attacks us from the front, but who from under the horse’s belly will grab us by the leg and roll over: like a cockroach that has tipped over on our back, we, without losing the regular amount of our strength, will powerlessly move our legs looking for points of support. Strength is an act, not potency ... "
    The same thing happens constantly in our economy. I can’t tell you everything here. Take a look at twirpx.com on the book “Economic Maneuver and Management Techniques” and try to start reading from my afterword.
  48. 0
    20 August 2017 10: 45
    Starikov to the kingdom!
  49. +1
    21 August 2017 10: 14
    "because there’s no one to choose from among the people ..." Do you still think that the people are choosing ??? laughing
  50. 0
    21 August 2017 13: 16
    If anyone believes that there is no one to put instead of Medvedev, “he is deeply mistaken! A mass of literate and DEDICATED homelands who have not taken out their children (descendants!) To the ge who is fighting with sanctions ...... PU and others like her !!! Well, it’s a very “euon” activity, by 99,9 .......%, it reminds a concussion !! However, it is VERY worried about the possibility of appointing an “euon” relative to the “euon” place ... Is it doubtful ??? And who could suggest that the former head of the furniture store is able to become the Minister of Defense? A L.G. Ivashov is very grateful (thanks somehow more like than thanks ...) for the article! SMART, DARK and GRAMFUL !!!
    1. 0
      24 August 2017 16: 34
      Major, did you actually serve?

      On February 23, 1995, at the Khankala in Grozny, the chief of the General Staff of the General Staff of the Army General Kolesnikov announced that he could not recruit even one company in all the RF Armed Forces capable of participating in battles ...

      The army and navy were falling apart by lamp-bearers, who attracted personnel for work, rather than combat training.
      The military-industrial complex, breathing in the air, produced pans and shovels, and not military equipment and weapons ...

      But Serdyukov not only violated the idyll of such lamp-bearers, but also destroyed ...



      “SERDYUKOV” OPERATION IS THE BIGGEST GEOPOLITICAL SUCCESS OF RUSSIA AT THE BEGINNING OF THE XXI CENTURY

      http://www.iarex.ru/articles/51971.html
      Why is Serdyukov not sitting?
      August 29 2015
      First, a little chronology.

      1996 year. Operation Jihad was an assault on Grozny by units of Chechen fighters in the month of August, during which they took control of most of the city. Chechen detachments also attacked and captured other major cities of the republic - Argun and Gudermes. After this, the shameful Khasavyurt agreements were concluded, putting an end to the first Chechen war.

      2008 year. The five-day war, during which the Georgian-trained and well-equipped army was defeated. It should be borne in mind that the forces of the parties directly involved in this war were approximately equal in number and armament (about 18-20 thousand soldiers on each side of the sides, approximate equality in tanks and armored vehicles). In aviation, the Russian Federation had a serious superiority, but the fate of the war was decided by land waxes. A brilliant military victory without any reservations in a record short time. The Israelis, shoved off the podium with their seven-day war, smoke offendedly aside.

      2014 year. Crimea is part of Russia without a single shot.

      What has changed since the end of the last century and where did Russia get a new beautiful army from, if we take the ground forces and air defense, then the best in the world at the moment (in terms of aviation and naval power - the undoubted second in the world).
  51. +1
    21 August 2017 18: 07
    Will this idiot idiot still remain in the premiers? How long can you tolerate this economic bacchanalia? Just the fact that he stated about economic growth, in my opinion, at 1..% in a few weeks, speaks of his intelligence. This increase is even less than a statistical error. So we all live in the garbage of statistical error. For their future, these heralds of patriotism have thought through everything, pensions, benefits, and a safe haven.
  52. 0
    24 August 2017 16: 21
    General Ivashov is mistaken that the confrontation began only in the 19th century!!!
    These degenerates were also persecuted by Svetoslav, Ivan the Terrible, Alexander Nevsky, Khan Batu... and not only...!!!
    The desire of Western degenerates to conquer and destroy Rus'-Russia is already more than 2 thousand years old!!!
  53. +3
    27 August 2017 06: 23
    Quote: The Truth
    Now the Russian Guard has been created in Russia. I would like to hope that this is a tool that will allow us to clear the government of Russia from the traitors of the liberties ... of the robbers who have been robbing and selling Russia for 25 years.

    The Russian Guard was created to protect the ruling class from the people. Precisely an estate created on the basis of swindlers who appropriated for themselves all the wealth created by generations of Soviet people, who are now put on starvation rations along with their children and grandchildren. So it’s not about the individuals ruling the country, but about the system.
    1. 0
      4 December 2017 09: 53
      It's about the POLITICAL system. Those in power say “let’s not have ideology,” but in reality this ideology exists: “rakes in the dough.” No one in the world has ever acted to rake in money and distribute it. So the ideology of individual enrichment, that is, the Golden Calf, is the ideology of the modern Russian state.
  54. 0
    28 August 2017 07: 21
    ...very good and competent article. conclusion: Medvedev is a CRIMINAL.
  55. 0
    28 August 2017 15: 25
    "It is clear that the Americans are not afraid of Medvedev, Siluanov and Nabiullina - it is their employees, so to speak." I agree with Ivashev. It is not clear why Mr. Medvedev is still prime minister.
    It is clear that some time ago he was favorable for comparison with the President, weak, limited, feminine. But now all the negativity associated with the activities of Medvedev’s government has already begun to negatively affect the attitude towards the President.
    The message - “We don’t surrender our own” is inappropriate here; they should demand even more from their own, in sovereign positions. And the attitude towards your people - “they didn’t care about their opinion, the Russian Guard is behind us” - is immoral.
    In the end, Mr. Medvedev communicates with the leadership of other countries and it’s a shame for the state that he is “cast in granite.”
  56. 0
    30 August 2017 07: 34
    The feeling is as if the conclusions are far-fetched to the author’s views.
  57. 0
    4 December 2017 08: 23
    It is impossible to “promote our industry using already modern models” under the current political structure of Russia. Individual projects under the watchful eye of the president (Himself!), such as the stolen “Eastern” or “Kerch Bridge”, where many are also warming their little hands, are not a structural restructuring of the economy, this is essentially the work of “fire brigades”, and with great difficulty. All these stories that “the economy comes first” are old sour noodles for the ears of the “masses”. The economy was and is only a tool for serving the desired political (power) structure, if we are talking about a real state. For nothing other than the political structure determines the “system of distribution of material goods,” that is, the “structure of liabilities,” so to speak, and the Economy serves what or whose assets to invest in for further profit generation. In our realities, there is essentially not a single economic project (or created cluster) that is controlled by private business and brings something to the state economy. If something is going poorly, then there is state participation of at least 50%, some kind of demand with a minus of funds for feeding the bureaucratic class of all ranks and stripes - who, again, have become involved in the processes not as employees, specialists , administrators, but purely “politically” and by the law of the “modern nobility”. I am not calling for the closure of private businesses. The experience of the Soviet Union has shown that without private initiative the incentive package is insufficient. But private business must KNOW ITS PLACE. Don’t suck money from the state budget, but help fill it, since the owners of our private companies are such “talented locomotives.” In reality, it's the other way around. Therefore, private business has nothing to do in strategic sectors of the economy. Either the consumer market, or, if you please, innovation. good gentlemen. Some “enlightened people” hint that Putin is looking for “a balance between the socialist and capitalist structure,” like trying to create a symbiosis. But after the privatization of the assets of the Soviet Union, we can’t talk about symbiosis here, but rather about periodic fake signs in the form of socially oriented “initiatives”, without real significant changes. In the current capitalist system (primarily the political structure of the country), no economic breakthrough can be expected. No matter what they start, the very first dividends (if any) will flow into private bags, and most likely even easier - the turnover will be sucked out, and any project will quietly fade away.
  58. 0
    8 December 2017 01: 20
    Well done, general! I stated everything as it is about this narcissistic peacock. He didn’t know how to work in any capacity, but he was always ready to wag his tongue. And it is necessary to drive out not only him, but also his entire gang - amateurs, talkers and outright swindlers. Those who are smart enough only to rob their own people under any pretext. Look where they are driving humanitarian convoys, but it’s high time to drive them into the Russian hinterland, where old people live out their lives in inhumane conditions - miserable pensions, lack of medical care, lack of supplies, often in dilapidated houses. Worse than citizens of warring countries. And the authorities at all levels are just scratching their tongues and lining their own pockets in order to buy real estate over the hill in case they get their tail pinched and have to flee. These are the “specialists” who rule the country! What kind of success can the country expect from them?
  59. The comment was deleted.
  60. 0
    19 December 2017 21: 13
    If they take this one down, they’ll give him an even more “bitter” one. We need professional people, not children of professors and “nanotechnologists”. If you wish, you can create a professional team, it’s not that difficult - there are people, but as you understand, it’s not very convenient to work with them - they know a lot.
  61. 0
    22 December 2017 15: 33
    wonderful analysis by Ivashov!
  62. 0
    15 March 2018 23: 58
    but the general is right! Medvedev is the weak link, but!... he WILL BE PRIME MINER AGAIN... and this whole United Russia (yes! there are some worthy people there) will continue their “activities”...... in general, writing about the tadpole of the roof is simply disgusting for a long time !!!
  63. 0
    16 March 2018 14: 01
    The entire Russian supreme thieves' power needs to be changed.
  64. 0
    25 March 2018 21: 22
    Just like Putin, there is no replacement for Medvedev! Firstly, this is a tandem, and secondly, the president is happy with the government! Period! Don’t stop them from making a breakthrough and a decade of victories!!! Moreover, the prime minister knows how to use an iPhone! And this important in leading the government.
    1. 0
      28 March 2018 20: 30
      there is a replacement, there lives such a person, Mikhail Vyacheslavovich, he will tie the fuck up to everyone
  65. The comment was deleted.
  66. The comment was deleted.