Logistics support vessel "Elbrus" began to move north

20
According to the press service of the PJSC Shipbuilding Plant Severnaya Verf specifically for the Military Observation, the logistics ship Elbrus of the 23120 project departed from the Shipyard Severnaya Verf (part of USC JSC) to the northern latitudes for the final stage of testing. In preparation for the transition, the shipbuilders performed the bulk of the audit work.

During the transition, the crew and shipbuilders will check the seaworthiness of the vessel, test the Main Power Plant, multi-beam echo sounder, and cathodic protection system. Upon arrival at the destination, Elbrus will test the main ship systems and equipment for three weeks, practice interaction with aviation.

Logistics support vessel "Elbrus" began to move north


"Elbrus" - the lead logistic support vessel for the 23120 project. The construction of another ship of this project, the Vsevolod Bobrov, is continuing at the Northern shipyard.

Among the innovations foreseen by the project are a dynamic positioning system that allows to keep the vessel at a given point in all weather conditions, two electrohydraulic cranes with a load capacity of 50 tons, towing winches with a pull force of 120 and 25 tons, a cargo deck of more than 700 square. m. and others. The vessel is multifunctional: it can carry out loading, transportation and transfer of cargo; at the expense of a powerful power plant to tow ships, right up to the aircraft carrier; to participate in rescue operations and provide medical assistance to those in distress (the vessel is equipped with a pressure chamber for decompression); carry out mapping of the bottom topography and search for sunken objects. The hull of the vessel with the ice class ARC4 will allow it to walk in arctic latitudes, overcoming the thickness of the ice in 0,6 m.

During the construction of "Elbrus" was successfully carried out import substitution of equipment. For example, instead of the imported power cable, a domestic analog was used, the foreign system of finely sprayed water was replaced with the Russian one, instead of a hydro-acoustic antenna of European production, made in Russia was used.

Constructive solutions incorporated in the 23120 project allow its modernization over a wide range to meet the specific requirements of customers.

After the successful completion of the tests, the vessel will become part of the Russian Navy.

Key features of the 23120 project:
• length - 95 m;
• width - 22 m;
• draft - 9 m;
• speed - 18 nodes
• displacement - 9 500 t;
• cruising range - 5 000 nautical miles;
• autonomy - about 60 days;
• crew - 27 people.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    11 August 2017 12: 31
    Well, the “supplier” of our remote Arctic garrisons appeared in the army. Seven feet under the keel!!!!!!!!
    1. +16
      11 August 2017 12: 36
      [/ quote] Logistics support vessel "Elbrus" began moving north [quote]
      Yesterday, a comment was made to me: a military ship is a ship, and a civilian ship. It seems to be a military one, but a ship. How to understand?
      1. +1
        11 August 2017 12: 38
        Quote: Logall
        How to understand?

        And understand that this is NOT a BATTLE ship.
      2. +6
        11 August 2017 13: 08
        Do not worry. A "ship" is one who is armed; there are no weapons on the ship. The main difference is this. We at the Pacific Fleet have a ship of physical fields. Military auxiliary fleet. Flag of St. Andrew. The composition of the officers. It is painted in spherical color and has a number on board, - it seems, all the signs of a warship ... nevertheless, it is a "ship." Because there is no weapon on it, it is unarmed. In general, initially, a “ship” was a sailing ship with a characteristic type of sailing weaponry and a certain number of masts. In my youth I did practice at the frigate "Pallas", and so, we, the cadets, were told that he was also a "ship" because of the special composition of sailing weapons. Something like this...
        1. avt
          0
          11 August 2017 13: 12
          Quote: Brylevsky
          In my youth I did practice at the frigate "Pallas", and so, we, the cadets, were told that he was also a "ship" because of the special composition of the sailing weapons.

          wassat In fact, from time immemorial, Sailing ships were determined precisely by mover - sailing weapons, and also by the technical characteristics of the guns. He began to be on sailing weapons, Pallas "never battleship, but a frigate.
          1. +1
            11 August 2017 13: 20
            Yes. That’s exactly how it is ... The Pallas is a frigate. Because she has three masts, direct and slanting sails, and something else there ... forgot that. It has long been.
        2. +17
          11 August 2017 13: 45
          This I understand, the answer! Thank!
          1. +2
            11 August 2017 14: 09
            And thank you for the thanks. hi
          2. +2
            11 August 2017 19: 49
            You know, I have to apologize to you for misleading you with my inaccurate answer. The bottom line is as follows. The presence of weapons on board the ship does not make it a "ship". The fact is that in the now distant 90s I had to go to production practice at the military ship repair plant # 178. An unusual ship was being repaired there then, it was called the "SSV-80". I still do not know what this abbreviation means, but I can assume that the "communication vessel is auxiliary." I climbed the ship at work, and I remember exactly that it had anti-aircraft guns, in my opinion, the AK-630. That is, the “communication vessel” was armed, it had a fully military crew, nevertheless, the “vessel” ... It turns out that the author who spoke below is right. In the sense that the "ship" solves purely combat missions, and the "ship" solves purely auxiliary ones, even if it is armed ... Such is the rebus. Although ... if at that time in a conversation with members of his crew would call their ship "ship", I probably would have gone to the teeth laughing , "hazing" there was terry ...
      3. +1
        11 August 2017 13: 50
        Quote: Logall
        Yesterday, a comment was made to me: a military ship is a ship, and a civilian ship. It seems to be a military one, but a ship. How to understand?

        Warship and auxiliary ship.
    2. 0
      12 August 2017 08: 10
      I agree that ships of this class are very necessary for the Navy.
  2. 0
    11 August 2017 12: 32
    And when will the nuclear reactor in Pevek move? I remembered the even.
    1. +2
      11 August 2017 17: 26
      Judging by the site of Rosatom, next fall. The deadlines have been repeatedly shifted. Including due to dibiloid profane, who do not rummage anything in atomic energy. This type.
      1. +2
        12 August 2017 08: 09
        Quote: VERESK
        Judging by the site of Rosatom, next fall. The deadlines have been repeatedly shifted. Including due to dibiloid profane, who do not rummage anything in atomic energy. This type.

        Another liberalist, prevents my country from developing, including in that segment in which the empirialists are full of boobies, these liberals even dress the same and say stretching words ....
        If the same thing happened in the port of Los Angeles, he would have been silent, since only bad news from the Russian Federation warms the soul of the Russian anti-legends and liberals ...
  3. +1
    11 August 2017 12: 47
    The ship would go a couple of times to Syria and everything would be tested
    1. +1
      11 August 2017 13: 52
      Quote: APASUS
      The ship would go a couple of times to Syria and everything would be tested

      I agree. Combine business with pleasure.
    2. 0
      12 August 2017 12: 23
      Quote: APASUS
      The ship would go a couple of times to Syria and everything would be tested


      No, not all. And ice patency? It’s not just that these ships have a good ice class.

      And so, very necessary vessels with good capabilities. More of these are needed.
      1. 0
        12 August 2017 17: 21
        Quote: Every
        And ice patency? Not

        Ice patency can be worked out a bit later
  4. 0
    11 August 2017 19: 42
    Passed ship. In my provincial opinion. hi
  5. +1
    12 August 2017 08: 02
    map bottom topography and search for sunken objects

    These properties will not please comrades from NATO ...