Military Review

29 civilians became victims of airstrike of a coalition led by the United States in Syria

29
There are reports from Syria about the next “miss” of the American coalition. The planes of the coalition forces led by the United States launched a series of air strikes against the positions of the IG terrorists (* prohibited in the Russian Federation) in the province of Rakka. However, one of the blows did not come at all against terrorist positions, but at the civilian population of Raqqi.

29 civilians became victims of airstrike of a coalition led by the United States in Syria


Information Agency to Reuters reports that at least 29 civilians were killed in an air strike. The information service refers to the Syrian Center for Monitoring Human Rights. It is known that among the dead 14 children. The US military command has not yet commented on the next strike against civilians in Syria.

Against this background, new data are coming in on Syria’s and the pro-government armed forces ’breakthrough positions of the IG (*) in the area of ​​As-Sukhne. The anti-Igilov forces use artillery and armored vehicles, trying to reduce the resistance of the igilovs in this direction to zero. This is reported by the portal. AMN.

Among other weapons in the area of ​​As-Sukhne are used Tanks T-72, 130 mm M46 guns, as well as Grad rocket artillery systems. The main direction of strikes is hilly terrain, where several retreating terrorist groups have settled.
Photos used:
http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it
29 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. NEXUS
    NEXUS 9 August 2017 09: 24
    +6
    Identify people in those areas where civilians flock to bomb Verbami MANPADS ...
    1. insular
      insular 9 August 2017 09: 26
      +1
      Quote: NEXUS
      civilians

      Quote: NEXUS
      To equip

      Quote: NEXUS
      MANPADS "Verbami

      wassat wassat Here, only I see the contradictions?
      1. Vanek
        Vanek 9 August 2017 09: 28
        +5
        Quote: insular
        Here, only I see the contradictions?


        And where is the contradiction here ??? request
        1. insular
          insular 9 August 2017 09: 33
          0
          1. Peaceful and armed = antonyms.
          2. A group of civilians with weapons not controlled by the central command = illegal gang formation.
          3. An untrained civilian with serious military and technical equipment = risk for the whole circle.
          4. Civilian with access to serious military equipment, which he is not able to use = 100% withdrawal of these weapons and equipment to the shadow market with all the consequences.
          5. If after so many years of war, the peace is still peaceful, and not in the ranks of the new recruits of the army, then do they need it?

          It is strange to read this on VO ... Here it has become customary to think?
          1. Vanek
            Vanek 9 August 2017 09: 38
            +5
            Quote: insular
            100% departure of these weapons and equipment to the shadow market


            I gave you a weapon to protect yourself, but you sold it! ?? You are sick?

            This is not for you personally. This is true. In a nutshell.
            1. insular
              insular 9 August 2017 09: 46
              0
              Quote: Vanek
              I gave you a weapon to protect yourself, but you sold it! ?? You?

              If I’m a civilian, in a country where there has been a war for several years, and I’m still not drafted (or voluntarily) into the army, then the MANPADS suddenly fell down for me no more than a 100% load that we need to get rid of.
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 9 August 2017 09: 48
                +3
                Quote: insular
                If I’m a civilian, in a country where there has been a war for several years, and I’m still not drafted (or voluntarily) into the army, then the MANPADS suddenly fell down for me no more than a 100% load that we need to get rid of.

                If you sell weapons that can protect you, while leaving yourself without this protection, then you, my friend, are not healthy at all. Then you don’t need Willow, but a doctor. fool
              2. Vanek
                Vanek 9 August 2017 09: 51
                +5
                Quote: insular
                the cargo is a 100% shed to be disposed of.


                You do not want to protect yourself ???

                Yet again:

                Quote: Vanek
                This is not for you personally. This is true. In a nutshell.


                But maybe I don’t understand something either request
                1. insular
                  insular 9 August 2017 09: 56
                  +1
                  Quote: Vanek
                  You do not want to protect yourself ???

                  And why is civilian - civilian? wassat
                  He is not a home front worker. Not.
                  He does not serve in the army to protect himself and his homeland. Not.
                  He is a civilian in a ruined country, living on humanitarian aid ...
                  Him MANPADS? wassat Good luck.
                  Quote: Vanek
                  But maybe I don’t understand something either

                  yes
                  1. Vanek
                    Vanek 9 August 2017 10: 21
                    +4
                    From experience:

                    A friend drove the gun onto D.R. Comrade thrice from prison.

                    - Vanka, why do I need him? And times are not 90s. And everything has changed. What for?
                    - You, I say, - a brother (my older, cousin) lives in a private trader. Well, never mind what? What crooks will climb. Let him be better.

                    Anything is safer with him than without him.

                    Regarding MANPADS? Then yes. No question. In Novosibirsk, he is not needed. But there! In Syria. Question subject:

                    Quote: NEXUS
                    Identify people in those areas where civilians flock to bomb Verbami MANPADS ...


                    As for me, so in every yard on the "Buk" in every barn on the "Cuba".

                    Each super hornet has its own “Wasp”.
                    1. NEXUS
                      NEXUS 9 August 2017 12: 07
                      +2
                      Quote: Vanek
                      As for me, so in every yard on the "Buk" in every barn on the "Cuba".

                      Strong... laughing This is stronger than William Shakespeare ....
                      Actually, I was talking a little not about such drastic measures ... to the village in a couple of MANPADS ... I think this will be enough to discourage the mattresses and iron the civilians.
          2. NEXUS
            NEXUS 9 August 2017 09: 45
            +3
            Quote: insular
            Peaceful and armed = antonyms.

            I’m not talking about filling up civilians with weapons, dear, but I think it is advisable to provide minimal protection against such raids.
            Quote: insular
            A group of civilians with weapons not controlled by the central command = illegal gang formation.

            Seriously? There are so many weapons in Syria that your first thesis is not at the box office at all. Another issue is that any civilian has the right to protection.
            Quote: insular
            An untrained civilian with serious military and technical equipment = risk for the whole circle.

            And which one? Our bombers and fighters fly at altitudes of more than 6 km ...
            Quote: insular
            Civilian with access to serious military equipment, which he is not able to use = 100% withdrawal of these weapons and equipment to the shadow market with all the consequences.

            Something this fact did not stop the mattresses in Afghanistan when the Stingers overwhelmed the dushmans.
            Quote: insular
            It is strange to read this on VO ... Here it has become customary to think?

            Well, reading your opus, I come to the same conclusion.
            1. insular
              insular 9 August 2017 09: 50
              0
              I don’t even want to comment ...
              Quote: NEXUS
              any civilian has the right to protection.

              Someone does not let in the army? Why peaceful MANPADS? wassat
              Quote: NEXUS
              There are so many weapons in Syria now that your first thesis is not at the box office
              MANPADS? wassat
              Quote: NEXUS
              Something this fact did not stop the mattresses in Afghanistan, when the Stingers overwhelmed the dushmans.

              1. This is not a good example to shiver.
              2. And how many problems did this give rise to in the future?
              Quote: NEXUS
              Well, reading your opus, I come to the same conclusion.

              In the sense that the stupidity of your idea began to reach you? You are not hopeless ...
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 9 August 2017 10: 01
                +3
                Quote: insular
                Someone does not let in the army? Why peaceful MANPADS?

                Hmm ... I see that we are losing the patient ... If the peaceful goes to the army, how will he protect his village, dear, if he is hundreds of kilometers from him? fool
                Quote: insular
                2. And how many problems did this give rise to in the future?

                But I’m not talking about giving everyone peacefully hand over MANPADS ... I’m talking about minimal protection against such attacks.
                Quote: insular
                In the sense that the stupidity of your idea began to reach you?

                No dear, unfortunately you are hopeless. The essence of my thesis doesn’t reach you. Well, oh well.
                1. Vanek
                  Vanek 9 August 2017 10: 28
                  +4
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  If peaceful goes to the army


                  He will cease to be a civilian!

                  Quote: insular
                  with all that it implies.
            2. Vanek
              Vanek 9 August 2017 10: 25
              +4
              Quote: NEXUS
              Well, reading your opus, I come to the same conclusion.


              yes
    2. Jedi
      Jedi 9 August 2017 09: 35
      +11
      The United States continues to talk about the unprofessionalism of Russian pilots, while their own flyers constantly smear and peel at the civilian population, non-military equipment and infrastructure. So who is the layman?
      1. Vanek
        Vanek 9 August 2017 10: 32
        +3
        Quote: Jedi
        So who is the layman?


        And who showed that

        Quote: Jedi
        smear


        hi
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 9 August 2017 10: 35
          +10
          hi Well, yes, these cannibals do not care who to bomb - barmaley or civilians. It is possible that everything is systematically burned out, but they hide their true intentions behind the words about the "tragic mistake."
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 9 August 2017 09: 37
      +1
      The coalition and Mosul captured. Rather, what is left of it.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 9 August 2017 10: 23
        0
        It's been about three weeks since they captured it.
        What you show is the old city. There they fought to the end
        notorious ISIS fanatics.
        And most of the 3 millionth city is not destroyed. Losses among the civilian population were less than expected.
  2. Vanek
    Vanek 9 August 2017 09: 25
    +4
    "Miss"

    CE-LE-ON-RIGHT-LEN-BUT !!!
  3. Alex_59
    Alex_59 9 August 2017 09: 30
    +1
    F-14 in the photo is very to blame for what happened. laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. rpuropuu
    rpuropuu 9 August 2017 09: 34
    0
    From Syria, there are reports of another "miss" of the American coalition.
    - It was not a mistake, but a well-verified operation, civilians themselves are to blame for building their houses on the ISIS (c) Pentagon
  5. bald
    bald 9 August 2017 10: 01
    +1
    They give data on 14 children, and where is the data, let it be plus or minus about the losses of terrorists. Well, let there be a hundred of them (already funny). Was it worth it to bomb at all? - This question is for the UN sessions. How much should the coalition pay for the “fight” against 14 terrorists. Do UN soldiers have children or just crawl out? Well, how not to become cruel here.
  6. Topotun
    Topotun 9 August 2017 12: 00
    0
    And that the "world community" has gone hysterical - are children dying there? Fortunately, everything is as always - they call it collateral losses ... And with a shrug, they are preparing a new departure.
  7. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 9 August 2017 12: 29
    0
    After this war, it is necessary to distribute weapons and explosives to all Syrians and Iraqis who wish and send them to the FSA to take revenge.
  8. pilot306
    pilot306 9 August 2017 12: 51
    0
    Damn, the author of the article is gentle, like a muslin young lady: a comment criticizing the design of the article immediately deleted)))
    I ask again: what does the f-14 photograph have to do with this news ?! They bombed until 2006, or bombed Iran using a clean interceptor? !!! Most likely, just the readers here are considered illiterate in technical terms, which will do. I am waiting for the removal of this comment and warning or ban.
  9. Jack
    Jack 9 August 2017 19: 38
    0
    Yes, already catch the igilovets, give the Israeli MANPADS and shoot a video of him dropping an American plane shouting alla to the bar, and that's it on YouTube. Maybe they’ll become more precise laughing