29 civilians became victims of airstrike of a coalition led by the United States in Syria

29
There are reports from Syria about the next “miss” of the American coalition. The planes of the coalition forces led by the United States launched a series of air strikes against the positions of the IG terrorists (* prohibited in the Russian Federation) in the province of Rakka. However, one of the blows did not come at all against terrorist positions, but at the civilian population of Raqqi.

29 civilians became victims of airstrike of a coalition led by the United States in Syria


Information Agency Reuters reports that at least 29 civilians were killed in an air strike. The information service refers to the Syrian Center for Monitoring Human Rights. It is known that among the dead 14 children. The US military command has not yet commented on the next strike against civilians in Syria.

Against this background, new data are coming in on Syria’s and the pro-government armed forces ’breakthrough positions of the IG (*) in the area of ​​As-Sukhne. The anti-Igilov forces use artillery and armored vehicles, trying to reduce the resistance of the igilovs in this direction to zero. This is reported by the portal. AMN.

Among other weapons in the area of ​​As-Sukhne are used Tanks T-72, 130 mm M46 guns, as well as Grad rocket artillery systems. The main direction of strikes is hilly terrain, where several retreating terrorist groups have settled.
  • http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    9 August 2017 09: 24
    Identify people in those areas where civilians flock to bomb Verbami MANPADS ...
    1. +1
      9 August 2017 09: 26
      Quote: NEXUS
      civilians

      Quote: NEXUS
      To equip

      Quote: NEXUS
      MANPADS "Verbami

      wassat wassat Here, only I see the contradictions?
      1. +5
        9 August 2017 09: 28
        Quote: insular
        Here, only I see the contradictions?


        And where is the contradiction here ??? request
        1. 0
          9 August 2017 09: 33
          1. Peaceful and armed = antonyms.
          2. A group of civilians with weapons not controlled by the central command = illegal gang formation.
          3. An untrained civilian with serious military and technical equipment = risk for the whole circle.
          4. Civilian with access to serious military equipment, which he is not able to use = 100% withdrawal of these weapons and equipment to the shadow market with all the consequences.
          5. If after so many years of war, the peace is still peaceful, and not in the ranks of the new recruits of the army, then do they need it?

          It is strange to read this on VO ... Here it has become customary to think?
          1. +5
            9 August 2017 09: 38
            Quote: insular
            100% departure of these weapons and equipment to the shadow market


            I gave you a weapon to protect yourself, but you sold it! ?? You are sick?

            This is not for you personally. This is true. In a nutshell.
            1. 0
              9 August 2017 09: 46
              Quote: Vanek
              I gave you a weapon to protect yourself, but you sold it! ?? You?

              If I’m a civilian, in a country where there has been a war for several years, and I’m still not drafted (or voluntarily) into the army, then the MANPADS suddenly fell down for me no more than a 100% load that we need to get rid of.
              1. +3
                9 August 2017 09: 48
                Quote: insular
                If I’m a civilian, in a country where there has been a war for several years, and I’m still not drafted (or voluntarily) into the army, then the MANPADS suddenly fell down for me no more than a 100% load that we need to get rid of.

                If you sell weapons that can protect you, while leaving yourself without this protection, then you, my friend, are not healthy at all. Then you don’t need Willow, but a doctor. fool
              2. +5
                9 August 2017 09: 51
                Quote: insular
                the cargo is a 100% shed to be disposed of.


                You do not want to protect yourself ???

                Yet again:

                Quote: Vanek
                This is not for you personally. This is true. In a nutshell.


                But maybe I don’t understand something either request
                1. +1
                  9 August 2017 09: 56
                  Quote: Vanek
                  You do not want to protect yourself ???

                  And why is civilian - civilian? wassat
                  He is not a home front worker. Not.
                  He does not serve in the army to protect himself and his homeland. Not.
                  He is a civilian in a ruined country, living on humanitarian aid ...
                  Him MANPADS? wassat Good luck.
                  Quote: Vanek
                  But maybe I don’t understand something either

                  Yes
                  1. +4
                    9 August 2017 10: 21
                    From experience:

                    A friend drove the gun onto D.R. Comrade thrice from prison.

                    - Vanka, why do I need him? And times are not 90s. And everything has changed. What for?
                    - You, I say, - a brother (my older, cousin) lives in a private trader. Well, never mind what? What crooks will climb. Let him be better.

                    Anything is safer with him than without him.

                    Regarding MANPADS? Then yes. No question. In Novosibirsk, he is not needed. But there! In Syria. Question subject:

                    Quote: NEXUS
                    Identify people in those areas where civilians flock to bomb Verbami MANPADS ...


                    As for me, so in every yard on the "Buk" in every barn on the "Cuba".

                    Each super hornet has its own “Wasp”.
                    1. +2
                      9 August 2017 12: 07
                      Quote: Vanek
                      As for me, so in every yard on the "Buk" in every barn on the "Cuba".

                      Strong... laughing This is stronger than William Shakespeare ....
                      Actually, I was talking a little not about such drastic measures ... to the village in a couple of MANPADS ... I think this will be enough to discourage the mattresses and iron the civilians.
          2. +3
            9 August 2017 09: 45
            Quote: insular
            Peaceful and armed = antonyms.

            I’m not talking about filling up civilians with weapons, dear, but I think it is advisable to provide minimal protection against such raids.
            Quote: insular
            A group of civilians with weapons not controlled by the central command = illegal gang formation.

            Seriously? There are so many weapons in Syria that your first thesis is not at the box office at all. Another issue is that any civilian has the right to protection.
            Quote: insular
            An untrained civilian with serious military and technical equipment = risk for the whole circle.

            And which one? Our bombers and fighters fly at altitudes of more than 6 km ...
            Quote: insular
            Civilian with access to serious military equipment, which he is not able to use = 100% withdrawal of these weapons and equipment to the shadow market with all the consequences.

            Something this fact did not stop the mattresses in Afghanistan when the Stingers overwhelmed the dushmans.
            Quote: insular
            It is strange to read this on VO ... Here it has become customary to think?

            Well, reading your opus, I come to the same conclusion.
            1. 0
              9 August 2017 09: 50
              I don’t even want to comment ...
              Quote: NEXUS
              any civilian has the right to protection.

              Someone does not let in the army? Why peaceful MANPADS? wassat
              Quote: NEXUS
              There are so many weapons in Syria now that your first thesis is not at the box office
              MANPADS? wassat
              Quote: NEXUS
              Something this fact did not stop the mattresses in Afghanistan, when the Stingers overwhelmed the dushmans.

              1. This is not a good example to shiver.
              2. And how many problems did this give rise to in the future?
              Quote: NEXUS
              Well, reading your opus, I come to the same conclusion.

              In the sense that the stupidity of your idea began to reach you? You are not hopeless ...
              1. +3
                9 August 2017 10: 01
                Quote: insular
                Someone does not let in the army? Why peaceful MANPADS?

                Hmm ... I see that we are losing the patient ... If the peaceful goes to the army, how will he protect his village, dear, if he is hundreds of kilometers from him? fool
                Quote: insular
                2. And how many problems did this give rise to in the future?

                But I’m not talking about giving everyone peacefully hand over MANPADS ... I’m talking about minimal protection against such attacks.
                Quote: insular
                In the sense that the stupidity of your idea began to reach you?

                No dear, unfortunately you are hopeless. The essence of my thesis doesn’t reach you. Well, oh well.
                1. +4
                  9 August 2017 10: 28
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  If peaceful goes to the army


                  He will cease to be a civilian!

                  Quote: insular
                  with all that it implies.
            2. +4
              9 August 2017 10: 25
              Quote: NEXUS
              Well, reading your opus, I come to the same conclusion.


              Yes
    2. +11
      9 August 2017 09: 35
      The United States continues to talk about the unprofessionalism of Russian pilots, while their own flyers constantly smear and peel at the civilian population, non-military equipment and infrastructure. So who is the layman?
      1. +3
        9 August 2017 10: 32
        Quote: Jedi
        So who is the layman?


        And who showed that

        Quote: Jedi
        smear


        hi
        1. +10
          9 August 2017 10: 35
          hi Well, yes, these cannibals do not care who to bomb - barmaley or civilians. It is possible that everything is systematically burned out, but they hide their true intentions behind the words about the "tragic mistake."
    3. +1
      9 August 2017 09: 37
      The coalition and Mosul captured. Rather, what is left of it.
      1. 0
        9 August 2017 10: 23
        It's been about three weeks since they captured it.
        What you show is the old city. There they fought to the end
        notorious ISIS fanatics.
        And most of the 3 millionth city is not destroyed. Losses among the civilian population were less than expected.
  2. +4
    9 August 2017 09: 25
    "Miss"

    CE-LE-ON-RIGHT-LEN-BUT !!!
  3. +1
    9 August 2017 09: 30
    F-14 in the photo is very to blame for what happened. laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. 0
    9 August 2017 09: 34
    From Syria, there are reports of another "miss" of the American coalition.
    - It was not a mistake, but a well-verified operation, civilians themselves are to blame for building their houses on the ISIS (c) Pentagon
  5. +1
    9 August 2017 10: 01
    They give data on 14 children, and where is the data, let it be plus or minus about the losses of terrorists. Well, let there be a hundred of them (already funny). Was it worth it to bomb at all? - This question is for the UN sessions. How much should the coalition pay for the “fight” against 14 terrorists. Do UN soldiers have children or just crawl out? Well, how not to become cruel here.
  6. 0
    9 August 2017 12: 00
    And that the "world community" has gone hysterical - are children dying there? Fortunately, everything is as always - they call it collateral losses ... And with a shrug, they are preparing a new departure.
  7. 0
    9 August 2017 12: 29
    After this war, it is necessary to distribute weapons and explosives to all Syrians and Iraqis who wish and send them to the FSA to take revenge.
  8. 0
    9 August 2017 12: 51
    Damn, the author of the article is gentle, like a muslin young lady: a comment criticizing the design of the article immediately deleted)))
    I ask again: what does the f-14 photograph have to do with this news ?! They bombed until 2006, or bombed Iran using a clean interceptor? !!! Most likely, just the readers here are considered illiterate in technical terms, which will do. I am waiting for the removal of this comment and warning or ban.
  9. 0
    9 August 2017 19: 38
    Yes, already catch the igilovets, give the Israeli MANPADS and shoot a video of him dropping an American plane shouting alla to the bar, and that's it on YouTube. Maybe they’ll become more precise laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"