Modernization of the Tu-160 and Tu-95MS

67
Strategic modernization aviation is one of the most important programs in the context of the development of the armed forces. Repair and updating of existing equipment can extend the operating life, as well as improve the performance of machines and expand the range of tasks they solve. To date, Russian industry has begun implementing several large projects of this kind. Repair and modernization of strategic missile carriers Tu-160 and Tu-95MS are systematically carried out. In addition, in the foreseeable future, the troops will receive completely new bombers, built in accordance with the current plans of the military department.

The high priority of renewal of strategic aviation leads to the fact that the leadership of the Ministry of Defense regularly raises this program at meetings. The last at the moment a similar event, in which the repair of bombers was discussed, was held on August 4 with the participation of Defense Minister General of the Army Sergei Shoigu and other high-ranking military leaders. During this meeting several important statements were made. In addition, the leadership of the military department summed up the recent training events, discussed the recent naval parade and other recent events.



4 August, the Minister of Defense recalled that the strategic missile-carrying bombers Tu-95MS and Tu-160 are the most important component of Russia's nuclear potential. They participate in the strategic containment of the likely enemy, regularly carrying out flights in the waters of the Arctic Ocean, the Black Sea and over the eastern regions. In this regard, S. Shoigu called the repair and modernization of aircraft with the extension of their service life one of the priorities.


Tu-160 on upgrades. Photo UAC / Uacrussia.livejournal.com


Also, the head of the military department recalled the current work progress. The updating of the bombers is carried out by the joint efforts of several aircraft building and related enterprises, headed by the company Tupolev. Directly repairs and upgrades are carried out at the Kazan Aviation Plant named after S.P. Gorbunova, who previously built the serial equipment of renewable types. For the solution of new tasks, the production capacity of the enterprise has been significantly updated. New equipment has already been demonstrated to the leadership of the Ministry of Defense.

Currently, the aviation industry is engaged in the scheduled repair and modernization of existing equipment from the long-range aircraft fleet. At the same time, certain adjustments were made to existing plans not so long ago. So, at the end of April of this year, Deputy Defense Minister Yury Borisov, visiting the Kazan Aviation Plant, revealed the new intentions of the military department.

According to him, currently the Air Force has 16 strategic missile-borne Tu-160. All of these cars will have to undergo a deep upgrade. In fact, only the airframe will remain from the aircraft in the current configuration. All onboard equipment, up to cable runs, will be replaced. Such an update of the equipment will allow a noticeable extension of its service life.

The Deputy Minister of Defense also spoke about conducting research aimed at establishing the real potential of existing structures. In the course of such scientific work, it was determined that the Tu-160 have a high strength reserve. The stock of the resource, in turn, is almost unlimited. All these conclusions were made on the basis of theoretical study and practical research. Y. Borisov also stressed that the resource of the upgraded Tu-160 will be sufficient to continue the service until the appearance of the Tu-160М2 machines of the new construction.

As follows from the available messages and data, such an upgrade has not yet begun. However, it should start as soon as possible, and thanks to it, within a few years, long-range aviation of the VCS will have updated aircraft that have improved performance and new capabilities.

The construction of new aircraft, initially corresponding to a more advanced project Tu-160М2, has already begun. Kazan Aviation Plant managed to restore a number of key technologies required for the assembly of promising technology. In this case, the first car of the new type is planned to be built not from scratch. At the beginning of the nineties, the company had a backlog for the construction of four production Tu-160. Subsequently, two of them were used, while the subsequent fate of the other two remained uncertain to date. Not so long ago it was decided to use the assembled constructions in the construction of the newest Tu-160М2.

The existing backlog was returned to work, and a few weeks ago there were reports of real results. On July 11, an unfinished airplane glider with the 804 serial number was transferred to the final assembly workshop. In the near future, the glider will receive all the necessary components and assemblies, onboard equipment, etc. After the assembly is completed, the first Tu-160М2 will be submitted for testing. The fate of the last of the remaining reserves is not yet clear. All other new type bombers will be rebuilt.

During the recent MAKS-2017 air show, Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov announced the current schedule for the Tu-160М2 program. At the beginning of the next 2018, the first flight of the newest machine is scheduled. Subsequently, she will have to pass all the necessary tests, the results of which will be the necessary work. Serial production of new missile carriers is planned to start in 2021 year. Each year, the industry will have to transfer the aircraft on the 3-4 aircraft. In total, it is expected to buy about fifty bombers.

Modernization of the Tu-160 and Tu-95MS
Transportation of an unfinished glider Tu-160 to the assembly shop. Photos of the newspaper "Go!" / Bmpd.livejournal.com


Within the framework of the current program, the industry will have to solve several important tasks. Thus, it was already possible to resume the production of NK-32 turbojet engines. Before 2020, the Concern "Radio-electronic technologies" will have to create a new complex of on-board equipment capable of expanding the combat capabilities of the equipment. The combat potential of the Tu-160М2 is planned to increase with the help of a promising cruise missile, which is still known under the symbol X-DB. So far, only what is known weapon will differ in increased flight range and the latest on-board electronics with elements of artificial intelligence.

The modernization of the existing strategic missile carriers and the construction of new-modification machines in the distant future will significantly increase the grouping of such aircraft and increase the combat potential of long-range aircraft accordingly. Currently, the Russian VKS has only 16 Tu-160 aircraft, while the fulfillment of all plans under the Tu-160М2 project will result in about fifty new cars. Even taking into account the write-off of old equipment, which has developed its resource, all this will have only positive consequences both for long-range aviation and for all Aerospace forces in general.

The basis of Russian strategic aviation is still the missile-carrying bombers Tu-95MS. Several dozen of these aircraft serve on a number of air bases and also participate in the strategic deterrence of a potential enemy. Like the Tu-160, the existing Tu-95MS are subject to repair and modernization, with the help of which they can continue their service for a long time. The modernization program has already started, and relatively recently some of its additional goals were announced.

In April of this year, commenting on the update of strategic aviation, Y. Borisov said that the military department intends to replace the entire fleet of on-board equipment of the Tu-95MS aircraft, and thereby to maximize their service life. Such aircraft will serve for a long time; at a minimum, until the moment when the troops begin to receive the first mass-produced vehicles of the new type currently being developed under the PAK DA program. The latter are considered as the actual replacement for the existing Tu-95MS.

For repair and replacement of onboard equipment Tu-95MS bombers arrive at the Tupolev Moscow enterprise. There, dismantling of old units is carried out with the subsequent restoration of technical readiness, extension of the resource, installation of new equipment, etc. After this, the equipment is sent to the Zhukovskaya flight test and development base, where the necessary checks and tests are carried out. After testing is completed, the aircraft returns to its base.

Modernization of missile-carrying Tu-95MS started a few years ago. The first aircraft, upgraded to the state of Tu-95MSM, was introduced in the autumn of 2015. After that, several more aircraft of the same type went through the necessary procedures. The exact number of upgraded machines, however, is not yet specified. According to various estimates, about a dozen aircraft have been updated to date.

It is curious that the upgraded Tu-95MSM are not only used on duty and patrolling, but have already managed to take part in training events and real combat operations. So, since the fall of 2015, Russian long-range aviation has been regularly involved in attacking targets of terrorist organizations in Syria. According to some information, modernized TU-95MS took part in these operations.


Repaired Tu-95MS. Photo UAC / Uacrussia.livejournal.com


The ongoing modernization of the strategic missile-carriers Tu-95MS implies, first of all, an upgrade of on-board radio-electronic equipment. Receiving new instruments, the aircraft expands its capabilities and can more effectively solve new problems. In addition, aviation technology is equipped with means that allow it to carry the latest types of weapons. Upgraded bombers can carry X-101 / 102 cruise missiles.

According to various sources, the planned modernization will have to go through at least most of the troops in the Tu-95MS. Restoration and renewal will allow keeping such equipment in service for a long time, up to the appearance of promising attack aircraft PAK DA.

According to official data, the Russian Ministry of Defense plans to continue in the future to modernize the strategic missile carriers Tu-95MS in order to extend their resource. The main result of these works will be the preservation of a sufficiently large fleet of aircraft, capable of complementing the Tu-160 supersonic bombers with existing and prospective modifications. Later, Tu-95MS may give way to a newer PAK DA, which are just being developed.

Currently, the Russian Aerospace Forces have a fairly large fleet of strategic long-range bombers. There are several dozens of two types of machines capable of carrying various missile weapons, including those in nuclear design. In order to develop long-range aviation, the development of new aircraft models has already begun, and before their appearance it is planned to continue operating existing aircraft, for which it is necessary to carry out their ongoing and planned modernization. In addition, in the case of the Tu-160, we are also talking about the construction of new aircraft with updated equipment and improved capabilities.

Modernization of existing aircraft has already been launched and has managed to give the first noticeable results. The program for the resumption of the construction of supersonic rocket carriers is also progressing with some success. Thus, the Russian videoconferencing in the foreseeable future will be able to get all the required equipment that has been upgraded or originally built on a new project. Obtaining such aircraft will lead to the necessary increase in combat capability and the potential of strategic aviation.


On the materials of the sites:
http://mil.ru/
http://ria.ru/
http://rg.ru/
http://tass.ru/
https://tvzvezda.ru/
https://lenta.ru/
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
http://uacrussia.livejournal.com/
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    9 August 2017 07: 28
    Has anyone understood anything? I personally do not. There are a lot of letters and promises, but in fact, even for the modernization of existing machines, new systems and equipment come out that has not been created or adapted? It turns out that ongoing repairs are underway, and they will only be capital after 2020. Since if we are talking about a new filling that isn’t it is strange to talk about overhauls and modernization ... Restoring the production of NK 32 is also nonsense. In Soviet times, it was worse than Western models, and now even more so.
    1. +5
      9 August 2017 07: 47
      Quote: MegaMarcel
      but in fact, even for the modernization of existing machines, new systems and equipment come out that has not been created or adapted?

      Why do you think so? After all, the article clearly states, and in Syria they successfully “tested” both new missiles and new equipment.
      1. FID
        +7
        9 August 2017 12: 31
        Quote: bober1982
        Why do you think so? After all, the article clearly states, and in Syria they successfully “tested” both new missiles and new equipment.

        We ran in, as you put it, missiles, adopted into service. And the aircraft avionics is the same.
        1. +3
          9 August 2017 12: 35
          In order to “break in” new missiles, dear comrade, it is necessary to create new sighting systems, or to refine these same systems, and also it is necessary for the crews to teach how to launch these missiles.
          1. FID
            +8
            9 August 2017 12: 38
            Quote: bober1982
            In order to “break in” new missiles, dear comrade, it is necessary to create new sighting systems, or to refine these same systems, and also it is necessary for the crews to teach how to launch these missiles.

            Yes, what are you? Is it so serious? I really didn’t know ... Thank you so much for explaining it to me wretched!
            1. +3
              9 August 2017 12: 40
              Quote: SSI
              I really didn’t know ... Thank you so much

              Please.
              1. FID
                +4
                9 August 2017 13: 00
                Could you still evaluate the combat effectiveness of the Tu-160M2 and Tu-95MSM? Which one is more effective and why? I will facilitate your task: both have the same combat use radius without refueling.
                1. +3
                  9 August 2017 13: 06
                  Quote: SSI
                  Could you still evaluate the combat effectiveness of the Tu-160M2 and Tu-95MSM?

                  Is the article about this? And do I need it? He flew on the Yak-28 and Su-24, I can correctly assess the combat effectiveness. And I need it.
                  1. FID
                    +8
                    9 August 2017 13: 14
                    And I’m all conscious (more than 35 years), I am engaged in heavy machine control systems: Tu-22M2 / M3, Tu-160, Tu-95, Tu-142, Il-96-300 / 400, Tu-204/214 / SM, IL-76MD, IL-476 and light-An-148/158, Yak-130 .... I'm not writing about the Soviet Tu-154, etc. All Tu-160 (more than 30 aircraft) passed through my hands ... It's just that I don’t need about PNK, etc. etc.
                    1. +2
                      9 August 2017 13: 17
                      This inspires respect, why should we swear. With the upcoming holidays - August 12, 18 August 20, Happy Aviation Day!
                      1. FID
                        +4
                        9 August 2017 13: 22
                        And you with the same! True, I only celebrate on August 18 (although the Civil Air Fleet and the Air Force are close and close to me)!
          2. 0
            15 August 2017 19: 51
            And what kind of “aiming systems” are needed to launch lionfish?
    2. +5
      9 August 2017 07: 59
      Actually, for the new Tu-160M2, as they say at PJSC Kuznetsov (Samara) they are now producing NK-32-2 turbojet engines, they say that they are an order of magnitude better than the old NK-32, but they don’t have those \ characteristics not printed, everywhere mostly unconfirmed speculation. Yes
      1. +3
        9 August 2017 13: 30
        Quote: RusArmy235
        Actually, for the new Tu-160M2, as they say at PJSC Kuznetsov (Samara) they are now producing NK-32-2 turbojet engines, they say that they are an order of magnitude better than the old NK-32, but they don’t have those \ characteristics not printed, everywhere mostly unconfirmed speculation. Yes

        Help you to comment drinks :
    3. +5
      9 August 2017 09: 47
      we grew up and matured until the end of the 80s. THIS IS AN EXPERIENCE OF STATE CONSTRUCTION. Apparently.
      1. +3
        9 August 2017 10: 05
        yes ... it’s always harder to restore than to destroy .... and if you really started crying, do it right .. not in the late 80s and 70s .. because the plane made its first flight in 1981 ...
        1. 0
          10 August 2017 16: 03
          here is the series --- the end of the 80s, but to a brand new one?
          1. +1
            10 August 2017 16: 07
            and who and what has created a "fundamentally new" in aviation since then ???? their strategists will also be older in age ....
            1. 0
              10 August 2017 16: 17
              something to grow. Strategists are not necessary. A push for industrial production.
              a citizen simply copies, it’s good that they switched from direct imports (but the dollar exchange rate is another 35 versus 62)
              then wait for fret Y-Riki-tiki-tavi? how many years? - I wrote about the development of the country and the general growth of GDP with GDP above 1990, and not necessarily TU160
              1. +1
                11 August 2017 08: 27
                "citizen" does not copy, but creates .... because as the Americans themselves write, their "Boeing" is 60% of the Russian development !!!!
    4. +5
      9 August 2017 10: 43
      Quote: MegaMarcel
      The restoration of NK 32 production is also nonsense.

      The release was launched in the fall of 2016.
      The installation batch of five engines (upgraded) was transferred to the Customer.
      So you comrade lag behind the news feed, burrowing in his "total disappearance" ....
      PJSC "Kuznetsov" are provided with everything necessary and work like horses !!!
      1. +5
        9 August 2017 11: 55
        And so for the general development:
      2. FID
        +3
        9 August 2017 12: 27
        Quote: Samaritan
        PJSC "Kuznetsov" are provided with everything necessary and work like horses !!

        Who works???
        1. +1
          9 August 2017 13: 33
          Quote: SSI
          Quote: Samaritan
          PJSC "Kuznetsov" are provided with everything necessary and work like horses !!

          Who works???

          Sergey, as always, you won’t hear a good word ... and why don’t you like Samartsev so much ???
          1. FID
            +7
            9 August 2017 13: 46
            I am very good with Samara! He often visited KuAZ for work, but, I mean that QUALIFIED workers (locksmiths, turners, riveters .....), where can I get them ???
            1. +4
              9 August 2017 14: 36
              Quote: SSI
              where to get them ???

              You won’t believe it, but PM works somehow. All retirees were fired, my father-in-law recently, one of the last. Young people have gained a lot over the last 5-10 years. And somehow it works. I don’t know how, but it works. The problem is not with the locksmiths, but in those who sit in the Kremlin and do not want to create conditions in which it will be profitable to buy our Ily and Tushki instead of bobiks and watermelons. Type "invisible hand of the market." Where is she this hand? Protectionism flourishes everywhere, our "invisible hand ..."
              1. FID
                +2
                9 August 2017 14: 55
                Completely!!!
          2. ZVO
            +1
            9 August 2017 15: 43
            Quote: Samaritan

            Sergey, as always, you won’t hear a good word ... and why don’t you like Samartsev so much ???


            It’s not a matter of Samartsy, but that lies that goes on the News.
            I’m from Samara myself, and when I was at Kuznetsovo, I looked at the welding chambers.
            I know that the technical documentation was lost, and with urgent attempts to restore it, which began a couple of years before the publication of news about the resumption of production - the documentation for the last year was restored about 60% ... Could bring up to 80%. Everything else is irretrievably lost.
            Assembled engines - with a probability of 99% - overhaul of previously decommissioned engines using stocks of new spare parts. How completely new engines will do is obscure. Reverse reengineering only remains.
  2. +2
    9 August 2017 07: 33
    Tu-95ms was made in Samara, and not in Kazan, in the article a typo.
  3. mvg
    +6
    9 August 2017 07: 51
    Let's buy a B-52, about a dozen, and calm down on this. Everyone is happy, and the Moscow Region too ... Window dressing from violent activity. Resume production 30 years ago ... to go nuts, this is a dream.
    Then it’s on the conveyor and the VAZ-2103, I liked it, but there is no Vesta
    1. +3
      9 August 2017 08: 00
      The Americans most recently took off the B-29, which is impressive ......
      Quote: mvg
      To go nuts, this is a dream.
      Not only as the modernization went through. Joke.
    2. +6
      9 August 2017 09: 04
      how many on the west skated? what do not like? what comments?)) ...
      1. +5
        9 August 2017 12: 13
        Quote: Stabilization
        how many on the west skated? what do not like? what comments?)) ...

        “I don’t like this, Vesta,” he said proudly from the window of the tram .. laughing
      2. mvg
        +1
        9 August 2017 17: 05
        couple ok, thousand. and escho I had Mercedes, Audi, Volts, Opel, etc. .. and Koreans. little pieces 20-25. Vesta, Nissan engine, 109 horses, and interior from Almeria .. what should I like?
        1. +4
          9 August 2017 23: 09
          why do you compare Vesta with gelding? let's compare it with Kia Rio, Gilly and Solaris.
        2. 0
          16 August 2017 15: 04
          mvg
          Vesta, Nissan engine, 109 horses
          ,
          Native to Nisanov’s engine, not 109 filly, but 115
          You are our expert :)
          1. mvg
            0
            16 August 2017 15: 44
            Quote, for the "native". Give a link or bend yourself?
            // Lada Vesta engine - it is planned to offer customers a choice of 4 options, three of which are of their own design, and one is Japanese-French. Two self-developed engines are VAZ 11186 and VAZ 21127 with modified intake and exhaust, after which they changed the indices to VAZ 11189 and VAZ 21129, respectively. But the third is more interesting, because this is a new 1,8 liter, with a capacity of 122 liters. with. VAZ 21176 engine developed on the basis of the cylinder block of the VAZ 21126 engine, 1,6 liter. It was developed not so long ago and vazovtsy will offer it to the consumer for the first time.

            Foreign motor - RENO-NISSAN HR16DE-H4M having a volume of 1,6 liters and a capacity of 109 liters. with.
            //
            And please be on you.
    3. +4
      9 August 2017 10: 37
      Can you justify that the Tu-160 is out of date?
    4. +1
      9 August 2017 12: 11
      Quote: mvg
      Let's buy a B-52, about a dozen, and calm down on this. Everyone is happy, and the Moscow Region too ... Window dressing from violent activity. Resume production 30 years ago ... to go nuts, this is a dream.

      B-52 was produced in 1952-1962, they all have gliders as ancient as mammoth shit. The Ministry of Defense will be just not happy if the gliders and avionics of the Tu-95, which are newer for a couple of decades (Tu-95, which are the same age as the B-52, have long been decommissioned) are suddenly replaced by the American mammoth shit.
      1. 0
        9 August 2017 12: 25
        Your comment is enchanting, as is the comment mvg
    5. 0
      9 August 2017 20: 23
      Quote: mvg
      Resume production 30 years ago ... go nuts, this is a dream

      In fact, it is clearly stated that all equipment will be new, and only the hull will be old.
  4. 0
    9 August 2017 10: 58
    And where do they get the engines for the Tu-95MS? They are not released anymore and are not planned already. Need to translate to PS-90
    1. +2
      9 August 2017 11: 22
      Quote: Zaurbek
      And where do they get the engines for the Tu-95MS? They are not released anymore and are not planned already. Need to translate to PS-90

      Citizen, well, what are you talking about ???
      NK-12MP
      Key engine specifications
      Engine power
      - on take-off mode, kW (electric power) 11029 (15000)
      - thrust on take-off mode, kg 10221
      Specific fuel consumption
      - on take-off mode, kg / ehp / h 0,207
      - at cruising mode, kg / electric power / h 0,161
      The degree of increase in pressure at take-off mode, PC 9,7
      Assigned resource, h 5000
      Engine weight (without screws), kg 3170
      Length, mm 4837
      Diameter, mm 1620

      1. +1
        9 August 2017 11: 29
        And PS-90 A Turbofan engine
        Technical characteristics of the PS-90A engine
        Takeoff thrust: 16000 kgf
        Cruising thrust (H=11 km, M=0,8): 3500 kgf
        Oud. cons. fuel for the cruise. mode (H=11 km, M=0,8): 0,595 kg/kgf hour
        Compressor pressure ratio: 38
        Bypass ratio: 4,5
        Max. air consumption: 504 kg/s
        Max. temperature in front of the turbine: 1640 K
        Length: 4964 mm
        Fan Diameter: 1900mm
        Dry weight: 2950 kg



        FEEL THE DIFFERENCE!
        1. 0
          9 August 2017 15: 51
          So what? One is not produced, the other is released .. Thrust is higher, economical. I distinguish turbojet engine from a fuel engine ...
  5. +2
    9 August 2017 11: 15
    I thought - what does the article remind me of? I remembered the editorial from Pravda.
    "Realizing the historical decisions of the party and government ..."
    And then a spoonful of information on a bucket of water. Immortal style.
    1. +1
      9 August 2017 11: 34
      You exaggerate, for sofa onlookers there is enough information.
    2. +4
      9 August 2017 12: 00
      Quotes from great people: There is an interesting pattern on the net. The more blunt and coarser the commentary, the more microscopic the creature in life is the author. Inverse proportional relationship.
      1. +1
        9 August 2017 12: 35
        I see two options. Either I need to study the issue of publishing a collection of my comments, or you are the author of the article.
  6. +1
    9 August 2017 11: 18
    Ukrainian Air Force is also strong!
    1. +6
      9 August 2017 16: 08
      Return the cons !!!
  7. 0
    9 August 2017 11: 32
    It is clear that the program for building new bombers is for 3-4 five-year plans. Starting at age 21
  8. 0
    9 August 2017 12: 33
    Here (http://www.redstar.gr/Foto_red/Ru/Aircrafts/Tu_9
    5MSM.html)
    they write that before moms, only the Tu-95ms16 can be upgraded, of which about 57 are produced.
  9. 0
    9 August 2017 13: 39
    FID,
    I also celebrate August 18, this is the most chief aviation holiday of the year.
  10. +1
    9 August 2017 15: 26
    Quote: SSI
    Quote: Samaritan
    PJSC "Kuznetsov" are provided with everything necessary and work like horses !!

    Who works???


    That's it .... WHO? )))
    I have many friends with NGOs named after Rumyantsev, so there are some old people and young netut staff ... that's why they work in three shifts without holidays ...)))
    But Rumyantsevo even survived, but the same MIG and other aircraft plants in Moscow went under the hammer ...
    In Kazan, too, more chatter than real improvements and to the scale of the 80s as to the moon ...)))
  11. +2
    9 August 2017 15: 45
    Quote: mvg
    Resume production 30 years ago ... to go nuts, this is a dream.

    You are the dearest to speak nonsense of a cosmic scale and the saddest thing is that you are doing this categorically. It is even sadder that explaining anything to you is impossible, given your remoteness from such issues. Have you already turned 18, or is it a distant prospect?
  12. 0
    9 August 2017 15: 53
    I would make a bomber on technology IL-96, Wing / engines / cabin and equipped with modern electronics and replaced the Tupolevs ...
    1. +1
      10 August 2017 11: 30
      It also seems to me that it’s easier to remake a modern military transport
      (or even a passenger) aircraft in a bomber - a carrier of the Kyrgyz Republic,
      how to revive the military projects of the middle of the last century.
      It’s easier to attach pylons and containers to the fuselage and wings,
      (even make a bomb bay) to an airplane that has modern engines, avionics.
      Which is designed for ancient blue and whatman, and in a computer as a whole.
      1. 0
        10 August 2017 14: 24
        The idea is very sound, but container pylons will not work here - the flight range should be increased, and not reduced relative to civilian aircraft. It would be more correct to attach the fuselage with a smaller midship. We get a very cheap (relatively specialized military), very reliable and resource strategist. But not stealth. This minus may outweigh all the pros. It depends on who we plan to bomb.
        1. +1
          10 August 2017 15: 01
          “But not stealth. This minus may outweigh all the pros” ///

          I considered a cheap alternative to the dubious upgrades of the old Tu-160 and T-95 bombers. They are not stealth either.
          If Russia has money in the budget for PAK-DA, then it will probably be necessary to do it.
          1. 0
            10 August 2017 17: 13
            IL-96 serial PS-90 aircraft are pulled by 16 tons each. The range and carrying capacity are quite consistent, the engines can later be replaced with PD-16/18 ..
        2. 0
          10 August 2017 19: 38
          With the development of air defense and the presence of systems such as X-101-102 ... Do you need stealth in this class?
          1. 0
            10 August 2017 20: 44
            Not needed from the word at all. Strategists are now just a platform for launching long-range missiles.
  13. 0
    10 August 2017 12: 49
    Interestingly, how many of the 16 Tu-160s in the troops can actually carry out combat missions, and not stand, let’s say in the "iron line" or donors? units 3-4?
    1. 0
      10 August 2017 17: 13
      This is a military secret.
      1. 0
        10 August 2017 18: 12
        I mean, God forbid, that all 16 units.
        1. 0
          11 August 2017 07: 48
          2-3 on the upgrade constantly ...