North Korea considers the new sanctions of the UN Security Council a "terrorist attack" and is ready to respond to it "physically"

According to information TASSThe DPRK announced that it was ready to take "physical actions" in response to additional sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council.

Enemies should not forget that we are ready to take ruthless strategic measures, including physical actions, to fully mobilize our national power.

At the same time, the Security Council resolution adopted by 5 of August is characterized as a "terrorist act." It provides for the strengthening of the DPRK’s sanctions policy in response to the two inter-continental ballistic missile launches carried out in July: a ban on the export from that country of a number of minerals and products, in particular coal, iron, lead and seafood; a ban is imposed on the creation of new joint ventures with the DPRK and additional investments in already existing commercial organizations.

According to US estimates, with the full implementation of the new sanctions measures, the annual foreign exchange earnings of the DPRK (by 1 billion dollars), which are now approximately 3 billion, will significantly decrease.

Comments

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

And China and the Russian Federation, as always, are well served in front of the owner))

[Tamanskiy]

Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER

And China and the Russian Federation, as always, are well served in front of the owner))

And the owner, let me ask, who?

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

Who, who, the one who imposes sanctions against us ...

[cniza]

It seems that a grandiose performance is being played, however, some "actors" play their part in the present.

[Vladimir16]

In a circle chasing the "news".
In a couple of hours, this "news" will be again?

How this note differs from the one published two hours earlier

Pyongyang threatened to respond to sanctions with "physical actions"

??

[cniza]

Correctly nothing, who and why warms up this situation?

[rotmistr60]

For DIVAN SOLDIER
Something of logic in your two comments is not observed.

And China and the Russian Federation, as always, are well served in front of the owner))

and then

Who, who, the one who imposes sanctions against us ...

The most interesting thing is that you even have followers, pluses. You probably smoke there together?

[Warrior with machine gun]

the problem is that this "owner" assigned himself and you can knock out this nonsense from the "master" head only with a stick, the cattle breeders who didn’t receive properly at the end thought themselves to be the navel of the Earth and tell everyone how they should live, and the Russian leadership has a large layer of such figures, that begs one question: "gentlemen, whose good are you, and who do you work for?"

[Aleksey7777777]

And what remains of this DPRK?
Enemies should not forget that we are ready to take ruthless strategic measures, including physical actions, to fully mobilize our national power.
Defend oneself.

Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER

And China and the Russian Federation, as always, are well served in front of the owner))

[The black]

Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER

And China and the Russian Federation, as always, are well served in front of the owner))

Chef! Everything is lost! putinsl! sitszinspinsil! ... ... to all fans of the Un collection at the port of Nakhodka! The first ferry with volunteers leaves in an hour! ...

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

But he did not uphold anything, although the DPRK should be supported, and not sanctions imposed against them.

[forty-eighth]

Psychopaths are not supported, they are isolated.

[Tusv]

Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER

And China and the Russian Federation, as always, are well served in front of the owner))

What does the master have to do with it On a fig of Russia and China, the people with a nuclear baton offended by a milestone and all. It won’t reach America, and the radioactive infection is near at hand

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

Well, let the DPRK, Iran, be broken, and there you look and the line will reach us.

[igorj 51]

Well, let the DPRK, Iran, be broken, and there you look and the line will reach us.

In .. Today, “okay, let the DPRK”, tomorrow “okay, let Iran,” and the day after tomorrow it will come to you .. As Winston Churchill once said:
"... a country that seeks to avoid war by shame will end up with both shame and war .."

[Fei_Wong]

Quote: Tusv

What does the master have to do With figs of Russia and China, people with a nuclear baton offended by a milestone and all. It won’t reach America, and the radioactive infection is near at hand

And what for do we play along with the star-striped bandits who - mind you! - it’s just that they equate our country with the DPRK (the last sanctions against the Russian Federation, I recall, were part of the sanctions package, which included both Iran and the DPRK)?

[Tusv]

Quote: Fei_Wong

And what for do we play along with the star-striped bandits,

They are obligated under the nuclear program. Vaughn, everyone knows that Israel has nuclear weapons, but there is no evidence. And if they were, the bandit played along with Us. In general, you do not scream at every corner.

[igorj 51]

Under the nuclear program are required

Why on earth? And who, to whom and what is obliged ..?

[Tusv]

Quote: igorj 51

Why on earth? And who, to whom and what is obliged ..?

Treaty obligations on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. To whom? To ourselves, China, England, the USA and France plus Germany

[igorj 51]

Treaty obligations on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Then let me ask WHY neither Russia nor Kitapy impose sanctions through the same UN Security Council against India, Pakistan, and Israel, which, in the same way contrary to these same treaty obligations on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, created and have them ..?

[tamnun]

Quote: igorj 51

when let me ask WHY neither Russia nor China impose sanctions through the same UN Security Council against India, Pakistan, Israel, which in the same way contrary to these same treaty obligations on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons created them and have..?

Israel, India and Pakista did not sign the NPT.
Israel does not recognize the presence of nuclear weapons.
There’s nothing to impose sanctions on.

NPT (Non-Proliferation Treaty) is an international agreement to control the proliferation of nuclear weapons and related technologies. The contract was opened for signature in 1970. 190 states signed the NPT. Of the UN members, only Israel, India and Pakistan did not sign the treaty. Under the terms of the treaty, countries that own a nuclear weapon are considered only those countries that produced and detonated a nuclear weapon or other nuclear explosive device before January 1, 1967. Five countries satisfy this criterion — the United States, Russia, France, the United Kingdom, and China. ATall other countries, by signing the NPT, agree to never develop nuclear weapons and in return receive guaranteed supplies of peaceful nuclear technologies - this is called the “big deal”. Monitoring and enforcement of the NPT is entrusted to the IAEA.

S. Korea signed the NPT, receiving in return

receive in exchange guaranteed supplies of peaceful nuclear technologies

violated the contract by secretly developing nuclear weapons.

[igorj 51]

Israel, India and Pakista did not sign the NPT.
Israel does not recognize the presence of nuclear weapons.
There’s nothing to impose sanctions on.

So what..? India and Pakistan did not sign the NPT, but this doesn’t justify the non-proliferation regime of nuclear weapons whose apologists are Russia and China. As for Israel, it does not recognize but nevertheless has nuclear weapons. It is a fact. Thus, it violates this very regime of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. so don’t think that there’s nothing for us to impose sanctions on us. It’s just that you have a stronger roof, which covers your country in the whole of the USA. In this you are more fortunate than the DPRK. That's all.

S. Korea signed the NPT, receiving in return
receive in exchange guaranteed supplies of peaceful nuclear technologies

S.Korea withdrew from this agreement, moreover, on absolutely legal grounds. See Article 10 of the NPT:

1. Each Party to this Agreement, in the exercise of state sovereignty, has the right to withdraw from the Agreement if it decides that the exceptional circumstances associated with the contents of this Agreement endanger the highest interests of its country. He shall notify such withdrawal in three months to all Parties to the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council. Such a notice should contain a statement of exceptional circumstances, which he considers to be in jeopardy of his highest interests.

http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventi
ons / npt.shtml.
Secondly, the SCh.Korea did not receive anything other than threats against them from this agreement. From President Bush, Jr.

violated the contract by secretly developing nuclear weapons.

Just violating the non-proliferation regime your country violated by secretly developing nuclear weapons. But the DPRK didn’t hide anything in general .. After the threats of Bush Jr., they officially announced that they would develop nuclear weapons. So all these statements are nothing more than nonsense.

[tamnun]

Quote: igorj 51

So what..?

And that.
You cannot be accused of violating what you did not sign and did not commit to comply

Quote: igorj 51

India and Pakistan did not sign the NPT, but this doesn’t justify the non-proliferation regime of nuclear weapons whose apologists are Russia and China.

Do not understand ????

Quote: igorj 51

As for Israel, it does not recognize but nevertheless has nuclear weapons. It is a fact. T

Neither you nor I know the facts.
S. Korea - has, she acknowledged, Israel does not recognize the presence of nuclear weapons - the rest is guesses

Quote: igorj 51

Thus, it violates this very regime of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.

It is impossible to break what was not obliged to do

Quote: igorj 51

so don’t think that there’s nothing for us to impose sanctions on us.

not at all, it would be for nothing - imposed. By the way, and to Pakistan or India

Quote: igorj 51

In this you are more fortunate than the DPRK. That's all.

The only thing is that the DPRK signed the NPT and received all nishtyaki for it. violated and ran into sanctions.
Israel did not violate anything.

Quote: igorj 51

S.Korea withdrew from this agreement, moreover, on absolutely legal grounds.

You can exit, no one says no.
Only the sanctions she received not for the withdrawal, but for violating the NPT while she was in it

Quote: igorj 51

Secondly, the SCh.Korea did not receive anything other than threats against them from this agreement. From President Bush, Jr.

?????

Quote: igorj 51

Just violating the non-proliferation regime your country violated by secretly developing nuclear weapons

you cannot violate what you did not sign.

Quote: igorj 51

But the DPRK didn’t hide anything in general

Hid

Quote: igorj 51

So all these statements are nothing more than nonsense.

So I say - you write such nonsense.

[igorj 51]

You cannot be accused of violating what you did not sign and did not commit to comply

Well, actually this is a favorite pastime of your patron bosses of the Americans.

Neither you nor I know the facts.
S. Korea - has, she acknowledged, Israel does not recognize the presence of nuclear weapons - the rest is guesses

Well, well .. We don’t know the facts. Tell us, what tell us what is so secretive in your Zrail nuclear center in Dimon ..? Which was closed so that all sorts of IAEA experts are afraid to poke their nose there ..? This is to your statement that the DPRK allegedly hid something there.

not at all, it would be for nothing - imposed. By the way, and to Pakistan or India

Uh ... no .. Pakistan at that time had very good relations with the United States .. India, by the way, too .. In addition, both India and Pakistan needed the Americans for other purposes, which is why they did not begin to be pressured by sanctions. so it’s not so simple.

?????

Why are you so surprised that you already posed a few questions .. Or are you surprised that Bush Jr. threatened someone ..? Do you still believe that all American administrations are just doves of the world ..?

The only thing is that the DPRK signed the NPT and received all nishtyaki for it. violated and ran into sanctions.

And what kind of "nishtyaki" did North Korea get by signing the NPT ..? You can list .. Well, so as not to be considered unfounded ..?

Only the sanctions she received not for the withdrawal, but for violating the NPT while she was in it

Stop, stop..you list the violations of the United States and its allies violations of the NPT ..? which they commit without even leaving it .. And this, incidentally, is known to all. It’s just that no “world community” is making a fuss about this and doesn’t impose sanctions on these violators. I wonder why ..? Well, you could not name violations of the DPRK for the period of its stay in the NPT .. Well, what would not be unfounded ..?

Hid

Facts in the studio .. (c)

So I say - you write such nonsense.

So far, only nonsense on your part.

[Tusv]

Quote: tamnun

Israel, India and Pakista did not sign the NPT.
Israel does not recognize the presence of nuclear weapons

.
And cheat? Iran also did not sign. Got it, get it and sign the sanctions. Israel will be caught, it will also receive the first number

[tamnun]

Quote: Tusv

And cheat? Iran also did not sign

Iran signed

July 1, 1968, Iran signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which provides for the use of atomic energy only for peaceful purposes, and ratified it in 1970 [5]

Quote: Tusv

Got it, get it and sign the sanctions.

And absolutely deserved

Quote: Tusv

Israel will be caught, it will also receive the first number

For this, Israel must join the NPT.

[Tusv]

Quote: igorj 51

Then let me ask WHY neither Russia nor Kitapy impose sanctions through the same UN Security Council against India, Pakistan, and Israel, which, in the same way contrary to these same treaty obligations on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, created and have them ..?

India and Pakistan managed, before the creation of the 5 + 1 club. There is no evidence for Israel and South Africa. There will be proof, there will be public flogging. Don't worry

[tamnun]

Quote: Tusv

India and Pakistan managed before the creation of the 5 + 1 club

India and Pakistan do not sign the NPT
And their first devices exploded after the organization of the NPT

[igorj 51]

There is no evidence for Israel and South Africa. There will be proof, there will be public flogging. Don't worry

Yeah .. especially in relation to Israel .. even if there is evidence .. especially given the patronage of the world hegemon .. As they say do not tell my slippers ..

[Tusv]

Quote: igorj 51

Yeah .. especially in relation to Israel .. even if there is evidence .. especially given the patronage of the world hegemon .. As they say do not tell my slippers ..

My little piggy laughs that Israel will light its centrifuges and test its nuclear weapons on its territory. Here as in that joke:
-Wife to lose hard, almost impossible

[Wasiliy1985]

Neighing !!!
Thank you for having fun!
What is Israel, what is DPRK - like "no difference!"
What is called: "morons on a note !!"

[igorj 51]

On the fig of Russia and China, people with a nuclear club are offended by a milestone and all

And Russia and China, first of all, Russia needs people who are also with a nuclear club but much more powerful, and who are also offended by the whole world. And besides, every now and then arranges war games around the world ..?

[Warrior with machine gun]

and despite the fact that if it were not for these arrogant "democratic" earplugs, they themselves sorted out in a neighborly way. But no, these striped cockroaches need to get in, although their hole is beyond the ocean, all their crawling on the planet has one of the goals of creating foci of tension everywhere anywhere, only away from your territory (and the reasons and reasons for the emergence of these centers and the lantern, it will be necessary to come up with, for example, Iraq)

[Progressor]

I agree that our loosened. It was necessary to veto, definitely.

[siberalt]

Eun felt bad if no one was going to attack him. Well, "played around", but calm down. Thanks already for not being scared! Being constantly "good" is bad for your health.

[igorj 51]

Being constantly "good" is bad for your health

In your opinion, it is better to paint and merge everything and everything, if only the "big uncles" did not touch you ..? Hmm .. So we already went through it ..

[Anarchist]

Quote: siberalt

to be constantly "well done" is bad for your health.

but cave in for another place!
For the back ...

[Tusv]

The UN Security Council resolution could not be passed without the signature of Russia and China, so we are also enemies of Un?

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

He is a capitalist everywhere capitalist, only the USA is overseas, and ours are not far, Vladivostok is nearby.

[Tusv]

Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER

He is a capitalist everywhere capitalist, only the USA is overseas, and ours are not far, Vladivostok is nearby.

That's it. It’s more dangerous for us to turn out, and therefore they signed a resolution

[DIVAN SOLDIER]

Yes, he didn’t threaten us, but we, like the last ones, and ... you yourself are being recorded as enemies.

[tamnun]

Quote: Tusv

The UN Security Council resolution could not be passed without the signature of Russia and China, which means we are also enemies of Un

Could, members of the Soviet Security Council could abstain or simply vote in a vote.
As an example
In response to S. Korea’s aggression against South Korea, a vote was taken in the UN Security Council on sending an international UN contingent to counter the aggression of S. Korea

The UN Security Council was convened in New York on June 25, with the Korean question on its agenda. The original resolution proposed by the Americans was adopted with nine votes in the absence of "against." The representative of Yugoslavia abstained and the Soviet ambassador, Yakov Malik, boycotted the vote.

By the way, in Korea, UN troops fought against S. Korea, according to the resolution of the Soviet Union.

[Tusv]

Quote: tamnun

By the way, in Korea, UN troops fought against S. Korea, according to the resolution of the Soviet Union.

There, the fact of S. Korea’s aggression was evident. Another matter is the tacit consent of the bombing of Libya

[igorj 51]

There the fact of aggression of S. Korea was evident

Well, so in South Ossetia the very fact of "Russian aggression was also a face .. But just for that reason, all" whistleblowers "like you, and especially from the" Promised Land ", are bashfully silent about the circumstances preceding this very" aggression ".. Yes, and to whom to stutter about aggression but not to the Israelis .. Your country itself is not less aggressive, if not much more aggressive than the DPRK.

[tamnun]

Quote: igorj 51

There the fact of aggression of S. Korea was evident

Well, so in South Ossetia the very fact of "Russian aggression was also a face .. But just for that reason, all" whistleblowers "like you, and especially from the" Promised Land ", are bashfully silent about the circumstances preceding this very" aggression ".. Yes, and to whom to stutter about aggression but not to the Israelis .. Your country itself is not less aggressive, if not much more aggressive than the DPRK.

I can send you a dozen handkerchiefs.
There will be something to wipe away tears.

[igorj 51]

I can send you a dozen handkerchiefs.
There will be something to wipe away tears.

Better keep your snots. Useful. It’s you who’s pouring crocodile tears here over the “aggressiveness” of North Korea .. So you’ll be tearing these tears and wiping your snot at the same time.

[Tusv]

Quote: igorj 51

Well, so in South Ossetia the very fact of "aggression of Russia was also on the face ..

FAQ, FAQ? Wouldn’t be crazy. Georgia’s aggression recognized even by the regional committee

[igorj 51]

The UN Security Council resolution could not be passed without the signature of Russia and China, so we are also enemies of Un?

At least we ourselves are being recorded in the camp of Un’s enemies by this very vote in the UN Security Council ..

[zivXP]

- Whose shoe?
- My shoe, right now I'll knock them as taught on the UN rostrum.

[Kot3713]

North Korea all the tales tell not where they will not jerk and will not go into open military conflict. The DPRK has created an ideological sect, the local population believes in it , and the leadership of the UPRD is trying to make the whole world believe.

[Progressor]

I think that the Russian Federation should have vetoed sanctions ...
I think our Foreign Ministry has gone wrong.

[Kostadinov]

Of course, there will be physical actions - new nuclear tests at full power, launches of new mbr and new br from pl, and so on, let the Security Council fully enjoy the effect of its sanctions.
The DPRK does not frighten anyone with the “preventive war” as U.S. Presidential Advisor did. All the same, I think that the Yankee’s strong instinct for self-preservation is that they want to live and don’t intend to sacrifice themselves, and there will be peace on the Korean peninsula, peace and quiet and God's grace. And sanctions are a joke. In the previous resolution, they were forbidden to export coal, the better - they will eat more. energy for the population. Ribe was banned from exporting (and we were told that they were starving) - they would go away themselves. They refrained from exporting nuclear technology and weapons and earned much more - now it is already possible.

[40 years with varicocele]

Strong man !!! You can’t take him to Pont !!! He feels a brother’s shoulder nearby .... If suddenly the adversary wants to enslave the free Korean people, the BIG BROTHERS of the RF and PRC will stand nearby ..... There would be a signal .... I’ll go, I’ll send my sons for a good cause

[Kostadinov]

Quote: Kot3713

North Korea all the tales tell not where they will not jerk and will not go into open military conflict. The DPRK has created an ideological sect, the local population believes in it , and the leadership of the UPRD is trying to make the whole world believe.

MBR starts and nuclear tests are tales? Where did you see and read that they would start an open military conflict? Here the U.S. UTB said - preventive war (adviser to President Trump McMaster). Will the US go to an open military conflict or is it true fairy tales? The US leadership was able to intimidate Russia and the PRC, but not the DPRK - the whole world. : laughing

[Kot3713]

Do not throw fluff! Not when I did not support mattresses and did not seek out in front of them like many on this forum. But do not forget that they are the only ones who used nuclear weapons.

[Kostadinov]

Quote: Kot3713

But do not forget that they are the only ones who used nuclear weapons.

They were used because they knew for sure that the Japanese did not have nuclear weapons and there was no means of delivery to the United States Mainland either.
With the DPRK, it is now quite the opposite - nuclear weapons are not with 10-20 warheads, but with 100-200. Eto who needs to know for sure.
There are delivery vehicles: both mbr and submarines and rocket krillatiya, and this is also well known to washington. Even better, they know their so-called missile defense system and are very afraid that others may recognize it.

[nivander]

these all can, they don’t care. By the way, the DPRK is one of the few countries whose population is growing steadily

[Tolstoevsky]

Work, brothers!

[tamnun]

Quote: Tolstoevsky

Work, brothers!

how cute

[LPD17]

But I don’t understand from the word at all?
what are our claims to the DPRK ???
we were friends against some enemies!
at least they could keep silent and not support the UN Security Council rotten ...
and so ... ugly and mean
DPRK certainly has no complaints against the Russian Federation
and the Kremlin- ​​(((fufufu !!!