The trial of Ulyukaev began

103
Today (August 8) the court session in the case of the former Minister of Economic Development of Russia Alexey Ulyukayev begins. Preliminary hearings are held by the judge of the Zamoskvoretsky court Larisa Semenova. Recall that the ex-minister of the federal government is accused of committing a crime under part xNUMX, article xNUMX, of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - accepting a bribe by an official on a large scale. The maximum term for this article is 6 years imprisonment.

The investigation believes that Alexei Ulyukayev received $ 2 million for a kind of protection of the Rosneft acquisition of Bashneft. President of the Russian Federation Ulyukaev was dismissed after operatives recorded the fact of transferring bribes from Ulyukayev at the Rosneft office.

The trial of Ulyukaev began


Ulyukaev does not recognize his guilt.

It is noteworthy that the court hearings on the case of the former high-ranking Russian official will be held in private. Media representatives in the courtroom are not allowed. This fact is alarming, especially given the fact that the state declares its readiness for an open and uncompromising fight against corruption and organized crime.

Experts predict that the trial against Ulyukaev may take more than one month.
  • www.globallookpress.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    8 August 2017 10: 09
    I put it for 3 years of settlement.
    1. +19
      8 August 2017 10: 09
      Do bookmakers accept bets? laughing
      Our court is a game! And gambling. A bulk example of this, well, we remember Serdyukov. Apparently there are notes to the Criminal Code written in invisible ink (the lessons of Lenin), in which it is written that everyone is not destined to know.
      Cheerful Russian people! Judging by the court’s affairs, in our country there are drunk five-year-old boys rushing under the wheels of noble girls, disabled people re-flying special forces, noble ministers protecting people from biting billions, and helping them trackers hiding money from greedy banks. Well, pensioners who allow themselves to live after retirement. And the judges, seeing all this civil lawlessness, are walking to the song of the Basque and Arbokaity dances.
      Should we be sad! wassat
      1. +7
        8 August 2017 10: 59
        I put on a fine and conditional, and there amnesty to the day of victory
        1. 0
          8 August 2017 11: 09
          dik-nsk:
          and there is an amnesty for the day of victory

          Pro victory can be clarified? In the elections, this victory will be, or where is it predicted? For example, over corruption? wink
          1. +1
            8 August 2017 11: 12
            I answer, I answer, there’s no need to duplicate))) at the discretion of the court of course))) maybe for an election victory, or maybe by May 9))
        2. 0
          8 August 2017 11: 10
          dik-nsk:
          and there is an amnesty for the day of victory

          Pro victory can be clarified? In the elections, this victory will be, or where is it predicted? For example, over corruption? wink
        3. +3
          8 August 2017 11: 41
          Quote: dik-nsk
          I put on a fine and conditional, and there amnesty to the day of victory

          .......
          Quote: Evgenijus
          Can you clarify the victory? Will this victory be in the election, or where is it predicted?

          laughing laughing crying Buddy, Evgenijus, require a link necessarily !!!
        4. +1
          8 August 2017 13: 51
          they will understand, forgive, apologize, pay gold compensation for moral and some other kind of damage .... But a simple peasant will receive a three-ruble penny for a stolen sheep like nafig ...
          Russia ... Mlyn.
          1. 0
            8 August 2017 19: 12
            It’s not a fact that he will get a sheep. Our law enforcement officers often do not want to work on simple matters, they simply do nothing.
        5. +7
          8 August 2017 16: 57
          in a word, a circus, a cheap circus (do they really not understand that such nonsense, without concrete results (term of merit and confiscation) has long given a completely different effect.)
      2. +5
        8 August 2017 11: 39
        I bet on zero
      3. +1
        8 August 2017 17: 27
        Serdyukov is the only minister who completed the task. Let's see what he does with the helicopter.
    2. +5
      8 August 2017 10: 12
      "A thief should be in prison" ... I would, frankly speaking, propose a formula for embezzlers and bribe takers, when the time begins to start from the moment of full compensation for the damage .... Caught, closed and let him sit until he compensates + 5 years .. Replace in a month - it will sit for 5 years and 1 month, in 10 years - it will serve a tag ... will not reimburse it - let it sit for life, sew slippers.
      1. +4
        8 August 2017 10: 16
        Quote: Black
        A thief should sit in jail

        And why is Ulyukaev ONE responsible for the entire "cabal" ????
        1. +2
          8 August 2017 10: 17
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          And why is Ulyukaev ONE responsible for the entire "brawl"?

          Sorry, I'm not the head of the investigative committee, unfortunately recourse ... no question for me smile
        2. +1
          8 August 2017 16: 19
          Let them even condemn who was caught. And then the order of merit and honorary pension shines again
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +2
        8 August 2017 13: 08
        Here he is the correct train of thought, I support, officials should be punished to the maximum. hi
    3. +3
      8 August 2017 10: 12
      With the subsequent appointment to a high position, somewhere near his fellow student ...
    4. +5
      8 August 2017 10: 14
      Quote: kolkulon
      I put it for 3 years of settlement.

      Conditionally.
      1. +5
        8 August 2017 11: 11
        Quote: DMB_95
        Quote: kolkulon
        I put it for 3 years of settlement.

        Conditionally.

        It will be limited to a “handed down” house arrest as real and a divine fine.
      2. +5
        8 August 2017 12: 10
        Quote: DMB_95
        Quote: kolkulon
        I put it for 3 years of settlement.

        Conditionally.

        Yeah ...... And a fine of 2 thousand rubles, so that henceforth it would be inconsequential to scumbag. It can be said, he spat in the face of the majority of the cabinet, "asking" 2 lyama greens. Shame. There are probably less than a hundred nobody takes. It is interesting to read his description from the last place of work claimed for the court. Dmitry Alexandrych, as his direct employer, probably wrote like that: “the official, that from the treasury order, he was put in jail on slander, although he appeared to be decent, but in fact he was a cunning and thieving person; wasn’t, and therefore beat the brow and hadat, we don’t tear his downy hair from the snout and don’t cut off the hands of the lascivious, there aren’t such officials who would be able to perform the service under the sovereign’s treasury "....
        1. 0
          8 August 2017 16: 38
          It will be interesting to see the entry in the work book of Ulyukaev. as well as Vasilyeva and other Stakhanovites. Or records for smerds only
          1. +7
            8 August 2017 16: 59
            and why the hell is this book?)) hi
            1. +1
              8 August 2017 23: 20
              So read to grandchildren by the fireplace
    5. +1
      8 August 2017 10: 16
      I read and understand, but they can also let it go! laughing

      shall be punished by a fine in the amount of from three million to five million rubles, or in the amount of the convict's salary or other income for a period of three to five years, or in the amount of eighty to one hundred times the amount of a bribe with the deprivation of the right to hold certain posts or engage in certain activities for a term up to fifteen years or with imprisonment for a term of eight to fifteen years with a fine of up to seventy times the amount of a bribe or without it and with deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities for up to fifteen years or not.
    6. +3
      8 August 2017 10: 18
      I bet that he’ll pat him in the ass and let him go home, and then later he’ll be restored to work ((
      1. +3
        8 August 2017 10: 21
        and reward! laughing
      2. +3
        8 August 2017 10: 25
        Quote: Vlad7461
        I bet that he’ll pat him in the ass and let him go home, and then he’ll be restored to work

        Hey, that’s not fair ... this is my bet .... wassat
    7. +2
      8 August 2017 10: 41
      Quote: kolkulon
      I put it for 3 years of settlement.

      I put on a calm old age and he already served his term under investigation, a maximum of 3 years probation.
      Everything is argued simply, if Ulyukaev opens his mouth, then many will have to sit! This system does not fail, he is silent and gets freedom.
      1. +3
        8 August 2017 10: 50
        WE do not leave our
        1. +4
          8 August 2017 14: 49
          Quote: KUOLEMA
          WE do not leave our

          Why Rogozin dragged? Did he take bribes, or maybe he stole? You would have then hung portraits of Putin and Medvedev, they are certainly more out of place!
          1. +2
            8 August 2017 15: 32
            but doesn’t he take it? from he said so))))
    8. 0
      8 August 2017 10: 47
      I raise the rate to 4 years old, but conditionally, with a bracelet on my leg.
      1. 0
        8 August 2017 11: 06
        What to put, they will find, as always, a scapegoat, some sort of deputy deputy deputy and they will judge him. And the Ulyuk, like Serdyuk, will turn out to be “innocent sheep.”
        1. +1
          8 August 2017 14: 25
          Rafik vapsche not take out ...
      2. 0
        9 August 2017 23: 14
        Gold bracelet with Swarovski pants
    9. +1
      8 August 2017 11: 15
      kolkulon Today, 10:09
      I put on 3 years of settlement "Never, you hear, do not gamble with the state!" And even more so in our reality wink
    10. +2
      8 August 2017 11: 24
      Quote: kolkulon
      I put it for 3 years of settlement.

      I bet they will free, reward, lemons will return lol
    11. Alf
      +1
      8 August 2017 16: 03
      Quote: kolkulon
      I put it for 3 years of settlement.

      I bet that will jump off. Age, sores, old parents ...
    12. 0
      8 August 2017 17: 55
      The year of imprisonment and a fine of 2 million wooden. Will be released in the courtroom. And the sheep are safe and the wolves are full.
  2. +6
    8 August 2017 10: 10
    "It is noteworthy that the court hearings in the case of the former senior Russian official will be held behind closed doors. Media representatives are not allowed into the courtroom. This fact is alarming, especially considering the fact that the state declares its readiness for an open and uncompromising anti-corruption and organized crime. "

    Everything will be as with Vasilyeva ...
    1. +17
      8 August 2017 10: 20
      Lyosha, you are right as always! If the trial is open, then many unnecessary facts will come up.
      Conditional, maximum!
      You respect yourself. Everyone respects you! hi
      1. +4
        8 August 2017 10: 52
        Lyosha, you are right as always! If the trial is open, then many unnecessary facts will come up.


        only in fairy tales with pink unicorns does the trial of the minister take place under flashes of lenses.

        Well, there are enough storytellers who still live under parallel socialism and who have not yet capitalized in the Russian Federation and owe them free medicine

        Can still call SNS with BBS? Not? And what?

        But what are so few jokes about a court closed to journalists?
        1. +3
          8 August 2017 11: 34
          only in fairy tales with pink unicorns does the trial of the minister take place under flashes of lenses.


          They say belay in South Korea, criminal proceedings were instituted against three former presidents when they left their post and lost their immunity. There were three criminal prosecutions: these are presidents Jung Doo Hwang, Ro Dae Woo and No Moo Hyun. Jung Doo Hwang and Ro Dae Woo got real criminal sentences. It was even a question of the death penalty - there was not only corruption. Then they replaced it with a life sentence.
          Miracles and only. request The last president, Park Geun-hye, depending on the court’s decision, could face from 25 years in prison to life imprisonment and death penalty.
          Why do Koreans so dislike their presidents? what Maybe they don’t have their own Kiselev-TV?
          1. 0
            8 August 2017 11: 58
            Well, Korea, yes. there is a secret in secret. Anglo-Saxons are so interested in the trial of the President of Korea with access to the most secret information in the world

            I don’t even know who is there more, spies or photographers.

            It is not necessary to compare South Korea (the country showcase, which was allowed to be such until a certain point) with Russia.

            I don’t even know the name of the analogue of our FSB. I have not heard about South Korean swords yet

        2. +5
          8 August 2017 15: 01
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          Well, there are enough storytellers who still live under parallel socialism and who have not yet capitalized in the Russian Federation and owe them free medicine

          What are you doing! Your masters have not reported anything to anyone! The gigantic gap between the rich and the poor in Russia is the most eloquent in speaking of this! And our liberal government with Putin is quite happy with this aspect. But I think it is completely immoral when during the crisis, among the richest people in Russia, billions grow at a frantic pace. Plus 18% last year! We must not forget that all these billions are taken out of one, common pocket, called the economy.
          1. 0
            8 August 2017 15: 03
            What are you doing! Your masters have not reported anything to anyone!


            Have you already worn a wig with a red nose? Well, before you run onto the stage with this scream?

            The gigantic gap between the rich and the poor in Russia is the most eloquent in speaking of this!


            Well, go help the poor. give them part of your salary. be well done

            And our liberal government with Putin is quite happy with this aspect.


            such thought-rich characters are simple. I understand. slogan writer. don’t toss bags yes, fill up posts about unsatisfactory work of officials?

            But I think it is completely immoral when during the crisis, among the richest people in Russia, billions grow at a frantic pace.


            wake up actor. You have been living for more than 20 years under capitalism. not tired of counting other people's money? try to get your bag, buy a tool, rent it to the poor and do not ask them for money for its use

            We must not forget that all these billions are taken out of one, common pocket, called the economy.


            Yes Yes. I understood. sit down five. your stream of thoughts is just the light at the end of the tunnel. It’s a pity you have not yet become an official to improve the lives of Russians

            would have already healed like Christ’s bosom

            all on the forum you moan how many years. I would have paid the mortgage to good, but poor people.

            Instead of hitting posts here, I would look for grandmothers in the area - I would pay them a pension. I would start small.

            Or greedy?!? Or betrayed the homeland? Why did you buy a subscription to the Internet? I’d better help a pensioner! Or do you think there is no person in Russia for whom the level of your wealth is forbidden? Do you want to help him?

            Or let him help someone who is richer than you, eh?) Let the billionaires help, right?)

            1. 0
              8 August 2017 15: 14
              I like such income gap calculators) so not good. and so disgustingly watching after such bright people at the oligarchs fed

            2. +7
              8 August 2017 16: 15
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              wake up actor. You have been living for more than 20 years under capitalism. not tired of counting other people's money?

              And why did you decide that the extra income received by the oligarchs from our factories, oil, gas, gold ... strangers? Simply, if someone takes more (billionaires), then nothing else remains (people). From here we have billionaires, as in Germany, and the people live on wages worse than China, Iran, and the poor Baltic. Redistribution of the final product of labor is extremely unfair!
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              all on the forum you moan how many years. I would have paid the mortgage to good, but poor people.

              Do not judge by yourself. I express my thoughts on the forum, and not moan. The fact that I will help someone will not solve the problem of the fact that (officially!) 20 million people in Russia are below the poverty line. The direct result of the activities of our liberal government over the past 20 years.
              1. 0
                8 August 2017 16: 35
                20 million people in Russia are below the poverty line. The direct result of the activities of our liberal government over the past 20 years.


                the head would work, I would ask how many poor people there were officially before the arrival of the Medvedev government

                and you can trump your numbers between schoolchildren
                1. +2
                  8 August 2017 16: 40
                  Quote: s-t Petrov
                  the head would work

                  Does it work for you?
                  If we consider the statistics of Rosstat from the beginning of the 2000s, then the trend until 2013 is positive, because the number of poor people in the country over the years has declined:

                  in 2000 there were 42,3 million people (29%);

                  in 2006 - already 21,6 million people. (15,2%);

                  in 2010 - a total of 17,7 million people. (12,5%).

                  Since 2013, the number of poor people began to grow: from 15,5 million people in 2013 to 21,4 million, or 14,6% in 2016 - the figure accurately answers the question of how many people in Russia live below the poverty line.


                  Читать подробнее http://subsidii.net/%D0%B5%D1%89%D1%91-%D0%B2%D1%
                  8B%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8B/%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%
                  B2%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8-%D0%BE-%D1%80%D0%B0%D0
                  %B7%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BC/item/1115-%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%8
                  0%D1%82%D0%B0-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%8
                  1%D1%82%D0%B8-%D0%B2-%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%
                  B8% D0% B8.html on subsidii.net
                  A survey conducted by the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion (VTsIOM) showed that Russians consider a poor family with an income per member less than 15,5 thousand rubles. per month. According to Rosstat, about 43 million Russians have an average per capita income below 15 thousand rubles. per month. If we focus on the Russians' self-awareness, then the real poverty level in the country is approximately two times higher than the official one.

                  The Russian government underestimates the needs of the population. The VTsIOM said on Wednesday that now “Russians consider people with incomes below 15,5 thousand rubles poor. per month per family member. " Sociologists found this out during a telephone survey of 1200 citizens over 18 years of age. Incomes include not only salary, but also other income to the family budget.

                  About two years ago, in July 2015, Russians believed that poverty occurs if the income per family member is less than 11,2 thousand rubles. per month. Over the past two years, the subjective cost of living revealed in the polls has grown by almost 40%. http://www.ng.ru/economics/2017-04-12/4_6973_real
                  .html
                  1. 0
                    8 August 2017 16: 54
                    Since 2013, the number of poor people began to grow: from 15,5 million people in 2013 to 21,4 million, or 14,6% in 2016 - the figure accurately answers the question of how many people in Russia live below the poverty line.


                    Well, when it grows to the figure of 42 million as before the arrival of Putin and Medvedev - then you will tear your hair.

                    In fact, with the advent of Medvedev, the number of poor in the country decreased by tens of millions

                    According to Rosstat, about 43 million Russians have an average per capita income below 15 thousand rubles. per month. If we focus on the Russians' self-awareness, then the real poverty level in the country is approximately two times higher than the official one.


                    Yeah. here we are all lovers of paying taxes
                    1. +2
                      8 August 2017 16: 56
                      Quote: s-t Petrov
                      then you will tear your hair

                      You do not tear your hair anywhere. By closing your eyes to the existing problem.
                      Uryakvasgaz patriotism, a form of mental ill health.
                      The injustices of the existing order are already recognized by Putin, so be silent.
                      1. 0
                        8 August 2017 17: 03
                        The injustices of the existing order are already recognized by Putin, so be silent.


                        looking for justice? Well, find, tell me later where she lay

                        You do not tear your hair anywhere. By closing your eyes to the existing problem.


                        Well, do not close your eyes to tax evasion and to the gray salary for the Federal State Statistics Service. unemployed cannot find parking

                        I saw the poor in 93-98. Now they are several times smaller and this is obvious

                        And for the stas (figures) that 98 that 2017 is the same. the vacuum is to blame here or I xs what

                    2. 0
                      9 August 2017 23: 29
                      You I look great righteous capitalism. And a fan of paying taxes. Be smart in public transport then look at what's left
                      1. 0
                        9 August 2017 23: 42
                        Option train Moscow - Petushki
  3. +3
    8 August 2017 10: 16
    Recall that the ex-minister of the federal government is accused of committing a crime under Part 6 of Article 290 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - receiving a bribe by an official on a large scale. The maximum period under this article - 15 years in prison.

    In the Criminal Code under this article should be “The minimum term for this article is 15 years”, maybe then they start scratching turnips, before the babosos put them in a portfolio.
  4. +1
    8 August 2017 10: 16
    will be released after the election
    1. +2
      8 August 2017 10: 50
      and you have long been brought to justice the minister? Or is everything fine in your state?)

      You didn’t find the time when the clowns wrote that after the elections in 12, the salaries of the military will be lowered back

      they say Volodya is trying for a rating and then we will face reality. yeah.

      "experts on the couch" - a new project from VO commentators



  5. +2
    8 August 2017 10: 20
    before the law, everyone is equal, but there are more equal)))
  6. 0
    8 August 2017 10: 20
    The classic father Fedor with his "Not for profit, but only by the will of my wife who sent me!" hi
  7. +4
    8 August 2017 10: 20
    The trial will be delayed, and then they will be sentenced to a prison sentence and released - in short, sport fishing - caught, shown, released
  8. +2
    8 August 2017 10: 22
    The maximum term under this article is 15 years in prison.

    Who knows, Ulyukaev from which clan?
    1. 0
      8 August 2017 10: 54
      Who knows, Ulyukaev from which clan?


      Grey Wolves. Didn’t you read analytics and layouts?
      1. +1
        8 August 2017 11: 18
        Clan "Red Chub" is called, by the color of the haer of the clan founder.
        Members of this clan never really sat, maximum - house arrest until a court verdict.
        And then warm countries, white sand and the azure sea.
  9. +4
    8 August 2017 10: 22
    The maximum term for this article is 15 years in prison.

    15 years of house arrest ... recourse
    1. +1
      8 August 2017 10: 47
      Quote: Masya Masya
      15 years of house arrest

      In the country.. smile
      1. +3
        8 August 2017 10: 55
        Quote: Black
        In the country..

        It is also an option... good
        1. +5
          8 August 2017 11: 48
          Quote: Masya Masya
          Quote: Black
          In the country..

          It is also an option... good

          A summer house, as an option, on the Cote d'Azur. lol
      2. 0
        8 August 2017 12: 08
        Quote: Black
        In the country..

        Which one? The one in the Canaries? Or in that "hut" in the Bahamas?
  10. 0
    8 August 2017 10: 31
    Understand and forgive! wassat
  11. +1
    8 August 2017 10: 33
    Yeah, condemn, keep your pocket wider! One was already "condemned," in a 13-room apartment, she sang songs about slippers. There was information (unconfirmed) that she had not visited the threshold of the prison. It seems like another auntie a month old sat for her. Given the omnipotence of the clans, it is entirely possible.
  12. 0
    8 August 2017 10: 41
    This is negligence, not a bribe.
  13. +1
    8 August 2017 11: 04
    There will be a version of Serdyukov-2. For a thief is someone who is "carrying a bag over the fence," and if he steals cars and trains, he is a respected person. Sarcasm, of course, but why don't the owners and directors of bankrupt banks sit? Why are they not under confiscation? Why did everything calm down about the arrested governors? About the colonel and his accomplices with cubic meters of dough in the apartment? It is time to create the FSB department for the forced return of "London" and other migrant financiers.
    1. 0
      8 August 2017 11: 06
      Why did everything calm down about the arrested governors? About the colonel and his accomplices with cubic meters of dough in the apartment?


      Go to work in the Ministry of Internal Affairs or in the FSB - you will be in the know if you encounter this case in the service. From the sofa all the more details are not so juicy

      And who told you that this is generally your business? About cubic meters of dough and stuff?

      Maybe it was stolen from you by cubic meters? Or bored and want to savor the landings and executions?)

      It is time to create the FSB department for the forced return of "London" and other migrant financiers.


      I don’t even know how the office existed without your advice so capacious and smart

      verily in VO is a storehouse of folk wisdom. Any minister must first be sent to the VO in the comments before taking office. Here he will gain strength and knowledge.

      1. +1
        8 August 2017 11: 13
        I am not a supporter of Navalny - this time, I do not relish landing - these are two. But when in high-profile cases every time "a swing to a rupe, and a blow to a penny", then this is precisely the pouring of water into the mill. Either they don’t publicly advertise the detention, or bring the matter to a logical end and the whole country should know that they will not protect billions or posts from theft.
        1. 0
          8 August 2017 11: 14
          Or do not FIG widely advertise detention, or bring the matter to its logical conclusion and all


          advertise journalists. Throw bones to the crowd. Without details. And the details are already coming up on the forums.

          The case of cubic meters of money should go under the bar. As I understand it, according to the journalists

          1. +4
            8 August 2017 11: 22
            If you knew how you want to believe that everything will not collapse. Only by that I reassure myself that because of my "remoteness" I don’t know something. But life .. when "ikspert" writes that there was a lethal dose of alcohol in the blood of a child hit by a car, and the lawyer of this auto-lady begins to bleat that the child himself fell under the wheels because of this alcohol. And after that, iksperd remains iksperd, and a lawyer remains a lawyer. Yes, a lot of such a madhouse is heard, and there is no smoke without fire. So something like that. Not all, oh not all right in the "Danish" kingdom.
            1. +1
              8 August 2017 13: 25
              The "expert" who "discovered" alcohol in the boy, according to some reports, was awarded by unknown structures, and is located outside of Russia.
      2. AUL
        +3
        8 August 2017 16: 46
        And who told you that this is generally your business? About cubic meters of dough and stuff?
        And whose business is this? Turn on the thinker, finally, maybe then you will understand that the money is taken out of nowhere. According to the law of conservation of matter (maybe they heard about this?), If where something is added, then somewhere it will necessarily decrease! So in those cubic meters of dough there are also my pennies! And there is no need to yell that counting money in someone else’s pockets is unethical - dragging it from someone else’s pockets is even less ethical. So in vain you sergeant (information troops), so crucify for thieves!
        1. 0
          8 August 2017 17: 33
          And whose business is this?


          those who decided to devote their lives to service and the fight against embezzlers. and not forum fighters of professionals in all areas at once - both the investigator and the judge - here every second is so unique and comprehensive

          if where something is added, then somewhere necessarily decrease!


          Well, learn and then start planting everyone and sewing things so that it does not crumble in court

          So in those cubic meters of dough there are also my pennies!


          zakharchenko then? in bank packaging $? Well, let's get here without this noodle. leave her to the kids from the rallies

          So in vain you sergeant (information troops), so crucify for thieves!


          Yes, just the circus actors are tired. the soul requires professionals. and the Homeland gives birth only to forum fighters and investigators. And how it comes down to it ... Either a grief-post on the forum, or monstrous incompetence

          1. AUL
            0
            8 August 2017 17: 47
            Sergeant, have you ever tried to understand what the forum users say, their arguments, and object in essence? And then they met an opinion that did not coincide with the "party line", and immediately dump a bunch of crackling slogans that carry little sense and immediately blame all the grave opponent! It’s unconvincing for you somehow ... At the level of squabbles in a communal kitchen - the main thing is to scream your opponent, but the meaning is sideways!
            1. 0
              8 August 2017 18: 07
              tell in fact about your pennies from Zakharchenko in a bank package.

              a lot of pennies then?

              It’s funny for me to read your slogans. I want specifics.

              It’s unconvincing for you somehow ...


              yeah
              1. AUL
                0
                8 August 2017 18: 51
                a lot of pennies then?
                It’s funny for me to read your slogans. I want specifics.
                A lot of! And what do you think, whose pennies are these billions of bucks? But I will not give you lectures on economics - it seems that you do not understand this, and you DO NOT WANT to understand this! You have no time - you need to write something in VO.
                So - it’s free, sergeant! You can smoke and recover!
                1. 0
                  8 August 2017 19: 25
                  I understand that you are both an investigator and an economist and a prosecutor

                  in a bank package with US dollars - your cents cannot be. If they exist, then you can’t even imagine the scheme by which these pennies reached the bank packaging and the addressee in the person of the colonel. They have not been stolen from you. Colonel Zakharchenko has exactly 0,000 of yours

                  So - it’s free, sergeant! You can smoke and recover!


                  you can continue to fight corruption in the forum - apparently your ceiling

                  You have no time - you need to write something in VO.


                  read the story about the colonel and about his money before you bring nonsense about the penny stolen from you



                  1. AUL
                    0
                    8 August 2017 20: 02
                    I repeat the question again: from what means did these billions form? No need to talk about receiving schemes - this is a separate issue. Only - about the source money. Answer only this specific question, please.
                    1. 0
                      8 August 2017 21: 41
                      Bank packaging helped track the movement of funds. As it turned out, Zakharchenko himself kept the funds in cellophane briquettes, packaged in 200 thousand dollars more by banking institutions of the US Federal Reserve. There, a request was made through the Central Bank, to which a reply was received that the cash was intended for two Russian banks.
                      1. AUL
                        0
                        8 August 2017 21: 49
                        And so the money was stolen from the US Federal Reserve? Or two Russian banks? Where did they get the money?
                        You know, I'm sorry to waste time arguing with you. Not that level of discussion. Want to keep your last word? Yes, for God's sake, I give! I would be grateful if you save me from discussions with you, I am not interested.
  14. +1
    8 August 2017 11: 32
    I am also inclined to the opinion of the majority. The result will be as with Vasilyeva. Conditionally, they will take to work. I had to meet this type once. Was with Volsky A., it was necessary to solve one issue. They didn’t decide anything. Disgusting type. I have the honor
  15. 0
    8 August 2017 12: 36
    Yulia-yu, y-la-la - I’m completely innocent ... I stole a little, maybe they will be sentenced to three years, conditionally. I bet that they will not drag out the process for more than a month.
  16. 0
    8 August 2017 15: 32
    A dishonorable person cannot be a minister in the Russian Federation, because Putin himself appoints them to the post. All this is slander of the Americans and liberals with the aim of undermining the situation in the country using their agents of influence.
  17. +4
    8 August 2017 15: 43
    While there will be such:

    The Ulyukaevs will prosper ...
    And it is necessary that it be like this:
  18. +1
    8 August 2017 15: 57
    And what about this in China? And so it was back in 2015:
    "Chapter 8. Corruption and bribery
    Article 383. The following penalties are applied to persons who have committed acts falling within the definition of corruption, depending on the severity of the circumstances:
    individual corruption in the amount of more than 100 thousand yuan, is punished with imprisonment for a term of more than 10 years or an indefinite imprisonment with or without confiscation of property;
    under especially aggravating circumstances, shall be punished by the death penalty and confiscation of property;
    individual corruption in the amount of more than 50 thousand yuan, but less than 100 thousand yuan, is punished with imprisonment for a term of more than 5 years with confiscation of property or without it;
    under especially aggravating circumstances, shall be punished by indefinite deprivation of liberty and confiscation of property;
    individual corruption in the amount of more than 5 thousand yuan, but less than 50 thousand yuan, is punished with imprisonment from one year to 7 years;
    under aggravating circumstances, - shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of 7 to 10 years.
    A person who committed acts regarded as individual corruption in the amount of more than 5 thousand yuan, but less than 10 thousand yuan, in case of remorse after committing a crime and voluntarily returning the assigned, the punishment may be mitigated or this person may be released from criminal punishment; in this case, the organization or higher authorities apply administrative penalties; "(c) A special part of the CC of the PRC.

    Funny, up to 100 r (or what the yuan is now) is repented, and is free. And 000 r is generally not considered.

    In 2016 - even more interesting:
    According to the new rule, one can be sentenced to death if convicted of receiving a bribe in the amount of 3 million yuan (about $ 463 thousand). It is also noted that the death penalty will be imposed in "extremely severe cases" that had a "very negative impact." In the presence of extenuating circumstances, a death sentence may be imposed on probation.

    Hmm .. In China, Ulyukaev could also be sentenced to a “conditional” sentence - only it would have sounded like a “conditional” DEATH PENALTY. Let's see what will happen in the Russian Federation.
    1. 0
      8 August 2017 16: 02
      Quote: tanit
      Let's see what will happen in the Russian Federation.

      Nothing terrible for this poet ..
      The Minister passes under Article 290 of the Criminal Code, part six. It provides for several types of punishments.

      Firstly, it can be a fine of 3-5 million rubles, or in the amount of the convict’s income for 3-5 years, or in the 80-fold or 100-fold bribe with the deprivation of the right to hold certain posts for a period of 15 years.

      Secondly, the convict under this article faces imprisonment for 8-15 years. He may also be charged a fine (70-fold bribe size) or deprived of his right to occupy certain posts.
      1. 0
        8 August 2017 19: 48
        Quote: Pancir026
        The Minister passes under Article 290 of the Criminal Code, part six. It provides for several types of punishments.

        Yes, this is understandable, 15 years of deprivation + plus a fine - that’s the whole POSSIBLE maximum speed, I myself read the article of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and uploaded it in the posts above. hi
        I wonder how it will end. request
  19. 0
    8 August 2017 17: 05
    "as investigators recorded the transfer of bribe to Ulyukaev in the office of Rosneft
    from interested parties "////

    Only a completely crazy person will go to someone else’s office (to someone else’s territory, where
    full of cameras) to take a bribe.

    Explicit setup.
    1. 0
      8 August 2017 18: 51
      Is Case 3000 the same? laughing Or how? smile
      1. 0
        8 August 2017 23: 00
        There, in general, we are not talking about a bribe.
    2. +1
      9 August 2017 11: 30
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Only a completely crazy person will go to someone else’s office (to someone else’s territory where there are a lot of video cameras) to take a bribe.

      Nope ..... This is a belief in impunity and its invulnerability.
  20. 0
    8 August 2017 19: 38
    Again, some kind of godfather will be sad: he’ll heat up the bathhouse, cover the tables, the cancan rehearses, and Alyokha won't even drop by for an hour. This is not a lordly thing - time to wind.
  21. 0
    8 August 2017 20: 10
    Quote: GELEZNII_KAPUT
    and reward!

    Well, what without it!
    After all, in our country, as a rule, the innocent are punished and rewarded those who are not involved!
  22. Quote: dik-nsk
    I put on a fine and conditional, and there amnesty to the day of victory

    Join us!
  23. 0
    9 August 2017 12: 18
    They won’t put 100000% at maximum conditionally, and that’s a trifle. Well, of course, they don’t hold government posts for 3 times. It’s possible a fine. A muddy story, didn’t he understand that hitting Sechin could be a ride? This should be a complete fool. These are the fool ministers work in the government of the Russian Federation.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"