Military Review

US for disobedience are going to starve the DPRK

135
The media publishes information about what measures of sanctions pressure the United States is going to take against the DPRK in connection with the ongoing development of the North Korean nuclear missile program. Rattling weapons in the form of an approach to the shores of the Korean Peninsula by American aircraft carriers did not have any effect for the United States, and therefore Washington decided to switch to traditional measures of economic dirty trick.

Considering the fact that the DPRK is by no means included in the list of economically secured states of the world, Washington's decisions on new economic sanctions may well be called an attempt to genocide the republic's population.

It is known that the United States has developed and is promoting in the UN a resolution on the basis of which it is supposed to ban the export of coal, lead, fish and seafood, iron ore and some other goods from the DPRK. The resolution states that if the DPRK's foreign exchange earnings are now about $ 3 billion a year, then the sanctions measures will reduce it to about $ 1 billion. Obviously, this can lead to food problems.

US for disobedience are going to starve the DPRK


The resolution also states that the United States is going to prohibit countries from hiring labor from the DPRK. Earlier, one of the American congressmen, exaggerating this topic, said that Russia should be deprived of the right to host the 2018 FIFA World Cup, since "the labor of North Korean workers is mercilessly exploited during the construction of stadiums."

The United States states in the resolution that the DPRK should be deprived of participation in any joint projects.

The State Department has already stated that they are "confident in the support of the resolution on the part of Russia and China in the UN Security Council."

Moscow and Beijing have not yet officially commented on Washington's initiative.
Photos used:
www.kcna.kp
135 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Logall
    Logall 5 August 2017 08: 30
    +17
    US for disobedience are going to starve the DPRK

    And also put Eun on the peas! lol
    1. oldseaman1957
      oldseaman1957 5 August 2017 08: 43
      +6
      Quote: Logall
      And also put Eun on the peas!

      - Will Russia and China give peas? Or will the Americans themselves throw in a couple of bags for these purposes?
      Kindergarten police paranoia ...
    2. 34 region
      34 region 5 August 2017 09: 26
      +37
      08.30. Logall! It's time to put the United States. In our country today, only the United States imposes conditions on everyone and imposes sanctions. Why does Russia never put conditions on the United States? We consider Russia a Great Country, but the conditions are set for a Great Country. Weird. Why can't we put US conditions on the DPRK? Are we afraid of the USA or can't we physically? The United States has set up its bases in Japan and the South Caucasus, but the DPRK is to blame! The DPRK cannot develop its science and armaments, but the United States can !? The United States can poke its bases everywhere, and the DPRK cannot defend its territory! And let's put conditions on the USA too! Let the US remove its bases from Japan and the South Caucasus! Why not? Do nuclear missiles of the DPRK threaten Japan, the South Caucasus and the United States? No question! You are removing your bases, the DPRK is removing its missiles and placing nuclear missiles on Russia! How is such a move? Then Russian missiles will threaten the United States? And we will subordinate them to the command of the DPRK! Will the US be threatened again? And did the US bases in Japan and the South Caucasus threaten anyone? No? Well, Russian missiles, too, will not threaten anyone! Here, many are trying to talk about the supply of food by kind Americans to the DPRK. So Russia can also feed! And not humanitarian, but in exchange for the products of the DPRK. Why not? An interesting situation. Russia is under pressure, but it does not even kick and does not put forward any conditions! Russia immediately recognizes itself as a victim and patient and expresses deep concern! And in the face to give? Why are we afraid? Are you addicted? Losing the last piece of bread and foreign accounts? Maybe that's why we're not butting? Maybe that's why we wipe the snot and talk about our greatness? But if we are so great, why don't we set conditions? Why are they given to us? Maybe because we are trying to integrate into their world and spit on national interests? Why are we not interested in our interests? Or do we not have them? Are we going to enforce the interests of the United States or the interests of Russia? What is more important to us? Whose interests?
      1. Logall
        Logall 5 August 2017 09: 34
        +19
        Who is against? I'm not Romanov! Above was "irony". Of course you need to put amers. And in the pose "TO BEER"!
        1. Vladimir16
          Vladimir16 5 August 2017 10: 24
          +13
          Quote: Region 34
          Why does Russia never put conditions on the United States? We consider Russia a Great Country, but the conditions are set for a Great Country. Weird.

          Quote: Region 34
          And let's put conditions on the USA too! Let be...

          We should first learn to set conditions for our regional authorities. Or is everything in your 34th region excellent with the standard of living? There is no general debt of the population to the banks (all loans were returned), everyone lives in their houses, to which gas is supplied, the road. The kindergarten is nearby and the school is about to be handed over to a new one? There are beaches and water parks on the Volga. The population is employed and most of them are engaged in their own business. Is that all?
          Does the tractor plant produce equipment and supply it to many regions of the world (in the DPRK?)? Volzhskaya HPP and Lukoil pay taxes to the regional treasury. There are no cash vacuum cleaners in the form of federal and world retailers in the region, and trade belongs exclusively to the residents of the region.
          It's like that?
          It's time to take on the Americans !!!
      2. tamnun
        tamnun 5 August 2017 09: 38
        +4
        Quote: Region 34
        Why can't we put US conditions on the DPRK?

        Good morning.
        Do you think that the DPRK's policy suits Russia?
        Quote: Region 34
        Do nuclear missiles of the DPRK threaten Japan, the South Caucasus and the United States? No question! You are removing your bases, the DPRK is removing its missiles and placing nuclear missiles on Russia!

        In connection with the DPRK's nuclear missile program, the United States is setting up a missile defense program in South Korea and at other bases.
        In reply . This, of course, makes it necessary to invest additional resources in leveling the threat to both Russia and China.
        Can you blame the United States for this? DPRK deceived everyone (TC signed the NPT) created nuclear weapons.
        Now he is creating an ICBM, and in every word there is a threat to the United States, how would Russia react to such a thing?
        By the way, it puts nuclear missiles in Russia (DPRK) - what do you mean?
        Quote: Region 34
        And did the US bases in Japan and the South Caucasus threaten anyone? No?

        What does the DPRK have to do with it?
        Quote: Region 34
        And in the face to give? Why are we afraid? Are you addicted?

        No, I think there are adequate people in the Foreign Ministry and they understand that you can, of course, write out populist slogans, but Eun with nuclear weapons is a problem for everyone, including Russia.
        1. avt
          avt 5 August 2017 09: 46
          +13
          Quote: tamnun
          DPRK deceived everyone (TC signed the NPT) created nuclear weapons.

          Oh Wei! Mina is deeply purple for Eun, however
          Quote: tamnun
          Can you blame the United States for this?

          We will certainly reproach someone when you say who exactly after the signing, well, let's say - the rejection of nuclear weapons in exchange for food, banned the supply of this very food. And what is typical - not the DPRK, in view of the lack of this very food. And at the same time, and cleverly, he hacked the lobbied by Russia program of end-to-end railway communication through both Koreas with access to the BAM, for which they have already begun to specifically train personnel in Russia and began to collect technical equipment.
          Quote: tamnun
          I think there are adequate people in the Foreign Ministry and they understand

          Not only in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, but here on the website there is, and it’s even scary to say directly according to the "forbidden" Makarevich - "Do you remember how it all began?" Remember. bully
          1. tamnun
            tamnun 5 August 2017 09: 52
            0
            Quote: avt
            Oh Wei! Mina is deeply purple for Eun, however

            therefore, Russia supported all sanctions against the DPRK wink
            Quote: avt
            We will certainly reproach someone when you say who exactly after the signing, well, let's just say - the refusal of nuclear weapons in exchange for food, banned the supply of this very food

            Who? Only with facts pliz hi
            Quote: avt
            And at the same time, and cleverly, he hacked the lobbied by Russia program of end-to-end railway communication through both Koreas with access to the BAM, for which they have already begun to specifically train personnel in Russia and began to collect technical equipment.


            Quote: avt
            "Do you remember how it all began?"

            remind
            1. avt
              avt 5 August 2017 09: 57
              +8
              Quote: tamnun
              Oh Wei! Mina is deeply purple for Eun, however
              therefore, Russia supported all sanctions against the DPRK

              Azohenway! And I didn't know that I had such an influence in world politics! bully
              Quote: tamnun
              Who? Only with facts pliz

              Taki Gugel will help you. I don’t serve on Saturdays. Or like Shabbat? But then how do you tap off the comments? bully
              1. tamnun
                tamnun 5 August 2017 10: 46
                +3
                Quote: avt
                Quote: tamnun
                Somebodyonly with facts pliz

                Take Gugel to help. I don’t serve on Saturdays. Or like Shabbat
                ? But then how do you tap off the comments? bully

                I did not know that I was dealing with an Orthodox Jew. laughing
                And about - like the proof of Google itself - I had no doubts.
                People like you are always difficult with an evidence base, it is much easier to blurt out, yell Uryayay and blame everything. hi
                1. avt
                  avt 5 August 2017 14: 06
                  +6
                  Quote: tamnun
                  People like you always have a hard time with the evidence base.

                  When you sit on the bench, and Az the sinner will be the prosecutor, then you will be convinced of
                  Quote: tamnun
                  easier to blurt out
                  and evidence base.
                  When you take the trouble to restore the chronology of the process even to papelle Eun in terms of fraternization with the south, then we will talk about an adult, but for now I’ll go to the hands of Klava and go to the googel - “Learn, learn and unlearn”
            2. Captain Pushkin
              Captain Pushkin 5 August 2017 09: 58
              +5
              Quote: tamnun
              Quote: avt
              Oh Wei! Mina is deeply purple for Eun, however

              therefore, Russia supported all sanctions against the DPRK

              But only after the last antics of the United States, the lafa ended, Russia will not support new sanctions against the DPRK (well, this is if there are really adequate people in the Kremlin and the Foreign Ministry)
              1. tamnun
                tamnun 5 August 2017 10: 09
                +1
                Quote: Captain Pushkin
                But only after the last antics of the United States, the lafa ended, Russia will not support new sanctions against the DPRK (well, this is if there are really adequate people in the Kremlin and the Foreign Ministry)

                Of course, it will not support, the United States will continue to deploy missile defense systems. Russia will continue to invest money in leveling the missile defense system.
                Eun will continue to develop and improve both nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles, continuing to threaten the South Caucasus, Japan and the United States.
                Eun will then sell a pair of warheads to someone else.
                Well, all this will lead to a major war near the borders of Russia.
                Not the United States - the United States is far away, but Russia.
                Eun, of course, and perhaps even can shoot once in the direction of the United States, and may of course be successful, but he will not destroy the United States, but a burnt plateau will return from the DPRK and this whole crowd of hungry patriots will rush into neighboring states (including Russia), nuclear the war will be at the borders of Russia, not the United States --- and now a simple question? And what the hell does Russia want?
                1. Vladimir16
                  Vladimir16 5 August 2017 10: 34
                  +10
                  Russia does not need this. That is why you are not in the Kremlin but in Israel.
                  Triplets Hans, Christian and Anderson, all three to help you. laughing Read it. They are storytellers. You and the fairy tale came out crap. Apparently Hollywood is firmly in your brain. But the screenwriter is not your calling.
                2. Vasyan1971
                  Vasyan1971 5 August 2017 10: 42
                  +5
                  Quote: tamnun
                  Eun will then sell a pair of warheads to someone else.

                  Do not starve desperate guys with hunger!
                3. Nyrobsky
                  Nyrobsky 5 August 2017 10: 43
                  +11
                  Quote: tamnun
                  Well, all this will lead to a major war near the borders of Russia.
                  Not the United States - the United States is far away, but Russia.
                  Eun, of course, and perhaps even can shoot once in the direction of the United States, and may of course be successful, but he will not destroy the United States, but a burnt plateau will return from the DPRK and this whole crowd of hungry patriots will rush into neighboring states (including Russia), nuclear the war will be at the borders of Russia, not the United States --- and now a simple question? And what the hell does Russia want?

                  You somehow narrowly look at the problem, limiting it to the DPRK's neighborhood with Russia. And next to it is China. Nearby and two "allies" of the United States - South Korea and Japan. What unites them all? The fact that they all do not need a nuclear war with scorched spots and a gift, and therefore the United States will not be able to use it. And Eun has no choice but to brandish a nuclear baton. without it, North Korea will be rolled into the Stone Age. If mattresses were less involved in the affairs of other states, then there would be fewer states that aspired to acquire nuclear weapons, which is at least some kind of security guarantee. Everyone has already understood that the US guarantees are not worth the paper on which they are written. So a nuclear bomb is better in hand than American guarantees in the sky.
                4. avt
                  avt 5 August 2017 15: 55
                  +3
                  Quote: tamnun
                  Eun will then sell a pair of warheads to someone else.

                  bully Azohenway! And who participated in the creation of the atomic weapon by the Indians? Is the Kim family bully Who gave Pakistan nuclear weapons with the money of the Saudis ???
                  Quote: tamnun
                  but a scorched plateau will come from the DPRK and this whole crowd of hungry patriots will rush into neighboring states

                  Well
                  Quote: tamnun
                  and now a simple question

                  If
                  Quote: tamnun
                  a burnt plateau will come from the DPRK

                  Who is from there
                  Quote: tamnun
                  will burst into neighboring states

                  ?? Nuclear fires?
            3. sabakina
              sabakina 5 August 2017 13: 16
              +2
              Quote: tamnun

              Quote: avt
              "Do you remember how it all began?"

              remind

              Something like this...
        2. Vasyan1971
          Vasyan1971 5 August 2017 10: 38
          +4
          Quote: tamnun
          In connection with the DPRK's nuclear missile program, the United States is setting up a missile defense program in South Korea and at other bases.

          Aha! In Poland and the Baltics, for example. In reply...
          And "the DPRK has deceived everyone ..."
          "Now he is creating an ICBM and in every word there is a threat to the United States, how would Russia react to such a thing?"
          Something like how Russia reacts to Georgia, the Baltic states, Ukraine and NATO.
          1. tamnun
            tamnun 5 August 2017 10: 43
            0
            Quote: Vasyan1971
            Aha! In Poland and the Baltics, for example. In reply...

            nor mix everything in one heap.
            Who can even blame the US and South Korea and Japan for deploying missile defense in response to Eun's requests?
            Quote: Vasyan1971
            And "the DPRK has deceived everyone ..."

            Violating the NPT and falling under the sanctions supported by Russia, including
            Quote: Vasyan1971
            "Now he is creating an ICBM and in every word there is a threat to the United States, how would Russia react to such a thing?"
            Something like how Russia reacts to Georgia, the Baltic states, Ukraine and NATO.

            Great, it means that soon they will appear in North Korea - they are not there and all this will be close to the borders of Russia.
            Do you want this?
            1. Vasyan1971
              Vasyan1971 5 August 2017 14: 41
              +6
              "... don't mix everything up."
              And what is there to mix something? In the quest of the "exclusive nation" for global hegemony, all reasons (not reasons) are good. And why not stir up Eunwoo with nuclear weapons? If Yugoslavia had such a potential and the determination to use it against NATO, how would history turn?
              "Who can even blame the US and South Korea and Japan for deploying missile defense in response to Eun's requests."
              Any sane person.
            2. avt
              avt 5 August 2017 16: 00
              +6
              Quote: Vasyan1971
              Quote: tamnun
              In connection with the DPRK's nuclear missile program, the United States is setting up a missile defense program in South Korea and at other bases.
              Aha! In Poland and the Baltics, for example

              Quote: tamnun
              nor mix everything in one heap.

              bully And I-yay! A Jewish boy and such amnesia in his brain! bully Let's get the clave in hand and googel looking for HOW and from WHAT threat PUBLICLY for Russia justified the deployment of the USA missile defense position area in Europe. Buy a rooster and twist the whites for him
              Quote: tamnun
              nor mix everything in one heap.
            3. lance
              lance 6 August 2017 19: 41
              0
              tired of reading your ........ DPR did not sign anything (it did not have such opportunities) like you and the sovereignty of the country ... not your mind .......
            4. Pancir026
              Pancir026 7 August 2017 14: 59
              0
              Quote: tamnun
              Do you want this?

              Where is Israel and where is the DPRK?
              Why are you bustling where you were not invited, where your political weight and, in general, the weight of your country is ZERO, and your rituals in the form of comments generally make you laugh at the deep inadequacy of those who wrote them.
              Why are you so itchy and irritable ??
        3. APASUS
          APASUS 5 August 2017 11: 35
          +8
          Quote: tamnun
          Do you think that the DPRK's policy suits Russia?

          May I answer?
          I think the policy of C Korea does not suit Russia and China in particular, but it is not aggressive in nature as the policy of the United States, it is purely defensive.
          How many countries Korea has captured in the last 25 years and let's compare with the United States and the conclusions are not at all in favor of democracy.
          Or do you disagree?
          Quote: tamnun
          In connection with the DPRK's nuclear missile program, the United States is setting up a missile defense program in South Korea and at other bases.

          The United States uses nuclear Korea as a threat to the construction of a global missile defense system and it has nothing to do with it at all. There will be no From Korea, there will be Iran, China, Russia, everything is clearly checked. The construction of a European missile defense area has long been announced as an area to protect Europe from Iranian missiles and When the United States signed an agreement on its nuclear program, there was a proposal from Russia to close the area. In response, we received assurances that these missiles are not against you.
          Then against whom?
          Quote: tamnun
          Can you blame the United States for this? DPRK deceived everyone (TC signed the NPT) created nuclear weapons.

          I can reproach more than once!
          Just an example of Israel. The United States does not equally negatively treat the development of nuclear weapons by countries of the world, they do it selectively. For example, there are now threshold countries and there is no indignation from the United States.
          Quote: tamnun
          Now he is creating an ICBM, and in every word there is a threat to the United States, how would Russia react to such a thing?

          As I understand it, 2 -3 shock AUG S Korea approached the shores of the United States or vice versa, as they should react.
          Quote: tamnun
          no, I think there are adequate people in the Foreign Ministry and they understand, you can of course write out populist slogans, but Eun with nuclear weapons is a problem for everyone, including Russia

          I really want to hope that adequacy will prevail, especially in US foreign policy, but the problem of nuclear weapons must be resolved at the negotiating table, because the Americans were able to come to an agreement with the Russians on Cuba, and why is everything going on so one-sided
          1. tamnun
            tamnun 5 August 2017 11: 48
            0
            Quote: APASUS
            May I answer?

            hi
            Quote: APASUS
            I think the policy of Korea does not suit Russia and China in particular, but it is not aggressive in nature as the policy of the United States, it is purely defensive.

            With a purely defensive policy, there is no such rhetoric.
            There is no overmilitarization, etc., etc.
            Who is attacking or threatening to attack them?
            Quote: APASUS
            How many countries Korea has captured in the last 25 years and let's compare with the United States and the conclusions are not at all in favor of democracy.

            I don’t know what to answer you? some kind of immiscible mixture. I don’t understand at all, what does the USA have to do with it? Does the US threaten to invade the DPRK?
            Quote: APASUS
            In response, we received an assurance that these missiles are not against you.

            And what does Russia have to do with it?
            Quote: APASUS
            As I understand it, 2-3 shock AUG S Korea approached the shores of the United States or vice versa, how should they react

            And How ? somehow it seems to me that if the United States wanted to smear S. Korea, they would have done it calmly in the 90s. When there was famine, there was no nuclear weapons, the USSR collapsed, China would be silent --- but for some reason they stupidly sent the hungry DPRK a million tons of food a year.
            I am wrong ?
            Quote: APASUS
            I really want to hope that adequacy will prevail, especially in US foreign policy, but the problem of nuclear weapons must be resolved at the negotiating table

            So they decide, in the Soviet Beza - sanctions, Russia supported
            Quote: APASUS
            After all, the Americans were able to come to an agreement with the Russians about Cuba, and why then everything goes so one-sided

            We agreed to put the world on the brink of nuclear war, and only a miracle saved.
            How will you negotiate with Eun? What do you suggest?
            1. stalkerwalker
              stalkerwalker 5 August 2017 11: 50
              +5
              Quote: tamnun
              There is no overmilitarization, etc., etc.

              Is this term not applicable to Israel?
              1. tamnun
                tamnun 5 August 2017 12: 00
                +1
                Quote: stalkerwalker
                Quote: tamnun
                There is no overmilitarization, etc., etc.

                Is this term not applicable to Israel?

                Let's apply.
                Only the realities are different. Who has attacked North Korea in the last 70 years? Who is threatening her now?
                1. stalkerwalker
                  stalkerwalker 5 August 2017 12: 15
                  +6
                  Quote: tamnun
                  Let's apply.
                  Only the realities are different. Who has attacked North Korea in the last 70 years? Who is threatening her now?

                  Well .... you breathe ... laughing
                  Whose AUG are located near the DPRK? And whose leadership is provoking a conflict with the DPRK? Russia with China?
                  Remove the "irritant" in the form of the US presence in South Korea, and everyone in the Far East, without exception, will breathe a sigh of relief.
                  1. tamnun
                    tamnun 5 August 2017 12: 23
                    0
                    Quote: stalkerwalker
                    Whose AUG are located near the DPRK?

                    So what ?
                    Quote: stalkerwalker
                    And whose leadership is provoking a conflict with the DPRK?

                    North Korea, of course.
                    Who the fuck needs this Korea?
                    Quote: stalkerwalker
                    Remove the "irritant" in the form of the US presence in South Korea, and everyone in the Far East, without exception, will breathe a sigh of relief.

                    If you remove the United States from South Korea, the DPRK will attack it tomorrow.
                    As it already happened once.
                    1. stalkerwalker
                      stalkerwalker 5 August 2017 12: 25
                      +7
                      Quote: tamnun
                      If you remove the United States from South Korea, the DPRK will attack it tomorrow.

                      Would you go to the doctor, or something .... I understand that you are already hot. But even Rabinovich is adequate today ...
                      laughing
                      1. tamnun
                        tamnun 5 August 2017 12: 30
                        0
                        Quote: stalkerwalker
                        Quote: tamnun
                        If you remove the United States from South Korea, the DPRK will attack it tomorrow.

                        Would you go to the doctor, or something .... I understand that you are already hot. But even Rabinovich is adequate today ...
                        laughing

                        Refer to history
                        According to the former chief of the operational management of the General Staff of the North Korean army Yu Song Chol, preparations for the attack on South Korea began in the fall of 1948, and the final decision was made after the meeting of Kim Il Sung and Stalin in the spring of 1950 [9]. From the beginning of 1949, Kim Il Sung began to turn to the Soviet government for help in a full-scale invasion of South Korea. He emphasized that the government of Lee Seung Man was not popular, and argued that the invasion of North Korean troops would lead to a mass uprising, during which South Koreans, interacting with North Korean units, themselves would overthrow the Seoul regime.

                        In the predawn hours of June 25, North Korean troops, under cover of artillery, crossed the border with their southern neighbor. The number of the ground group, trained by Soviet military advisers, was 175 thousand people [11], it included 150 T-34 tanks, the air force had 172 combat aircraft [12]

                        Surprise for you?
                        You also tell me that the United States fought on the side of South Korea, and not the UN troops in accordance with the resolution of the Soviet Union.
                2. irazum
                  irazum 5 August 2017 12: 59
                  0
                  They themselves attacked in 1950. and were punished for it. And how many Chinese died there ... Even in China itself, there are no detailed statistics.
            2. APASUS
              APASUS 5 August 2017 12: 36
              +3
              Quote: tamnun
              Who is attacking or threatening to attack them?

              This is such Jewish humor, I just don’t understand?
              The United States may launch a preemptive strike against North Korea to prevent Pyongyang from conducting further nuclear tests. This information was disseminated by the NBC TV channel.
              Quote: tamnun
              Does the US threaten to invade the DPRK?

              Now I'm starting to doubt that you know
              A spokesman for the DPRK Foreign Ministry said that "if the United States dares to opt for military action, shouting slogans about a" preemptive strike "and" destruction of headquarters ", the DPRK is ready to respond in any form of military action desired by the United States."

              Quote: tamnun
              And what does Russia have to do with it?

              Indeed, the Americans have nothing to do with it, they just build their own global missile defense system and motivate them with the Korean threat.
              Quote: tamnun
              And How ? somehow it seems to me that if the United States wanted to smear S. Korea, they would have done it calmly in the 90s. When there was famine, there was no nuclear weapons, the USSR collapsed, China would be silent --- but for some reason they stupidly sent the hungry DPRK a million tons of food a year.
              I am wrong ?

              Very much right, but then Korea did not enter with the interests of the United States, the Americans "rested on their laurels" of the victory over the USSR
              Quote: tamnun
              So they decide, in the Soviet Beza - sanctions, Russia supported

              Where was this Owl Without when they bombed Yugoslavia, Libya, stop you
              Quote: tamnun
              How will you negotiate with Eun? What do you suggest?

              Once again, I’m talking about this situation. Korea, with all its specificity of the regime, was not going to attack anyone. Its nuclear program is a response to threats.
              I think it is quite possible to come to an agreement with Eun, he does not need anything other than peace.
              1. tamnun
                tamnun 5 August 2017 12: 50
                0
                Quote: APASUS
                This is such Jewish humor, I just don’t understand?

                No, that's a fact. Can you give at least one statement on this topic by officials? South Korea or USA?
                Quote: APASUS
                Now I'm starting to doubt that you know

                And you ? Can you cite at least one statement by the United States or South Korea about a military solution to the problem of 2 Koreas.
                There are thousands of statements by S. Korea leaders on this topic.
                Quote: APASUS
                .Just build their own global missile defense system and motivate with the Korean threat

                The Korean threat is a fact and the statements of officials. S. Korea - it is confirmed.
                Quote: APASUS
                Very much right, but then Korea did not enter with the interests of the United States, the Americans "rested on their laurels" of the victory over the USSR

                And now he suddenly enters?
                Am, a little Newbie, S. Korea has created nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles and is threatening the United States.
                She did not like that she was not included in the sphere of * interests * - she introduced her there herself.
                Quote: APASUS
                Where was this Owl Without when they bombed Yugoslavia, Libya, stop you

                Do not jump off the topic, it always happens when there is nothing to answer in essence
                Quote: APASUS
                Korea, with all its specificity of the regime, was not going to attack anyone

                She attacked and continues to threaten.
                South Korea. Japan and USA
                Quote: APASUS
                I think it is quite possible to come to an agreement with Eun, he does not need anything other than peace.

                Without the image of the enemy S. Korea cannot exist.
                1. APASUS
                  APASUS 5 August 2017 13: 21
                  +5
                  Quote: tamnun
                  No, that's a fact. Can you give at least one statement on this topic by officials? South Korea or USA?

                  How many statements do you need, will I type for you?
                  Donald Trump: “Now I find myself in a position where he (the leader of the DPRK - ed.) Has nuclear weapons. And we need to do something about it. "

                  On what basis can Trump do something with nuclear weapons from Korea, what powers has he received and where?
                  Quote: tamnun
                  And you ? Can you cite at least one statement by the United States or South Korea about a military solution to the problem of 2 Koreas.

                  As I understand it, we are not considering the issue of 2 Koreas now, it seems like the dialogue is going on around the nuclear program of Korea.
                  Quote: tamnun
                  The Korean threat is a fact and the statements of officials. S. Korea - it is confirmed.

                  Now you type the statements of officials from Korea where they show aggression towards other countries, namely aggressive plans to seize other countries, and not an attempt to respond to US aggression with nuclear weapons.
                  Quote: tamnun
                  And now he suddenly enters?
                  Am, a little Newbie, S. Korea has created nuclear weapons and delivery vehicles and is threatening the United States.
                  She did not like that she was not included in the sphere of * interests * - she introduced her there herself.

                  All those who have abandoned the creation of nuclear weapons and have agreed with the Americans are far away, remember Libya or Iraq. Unfortunately, nuclear weapons are the guarantor of non-attack.
                  Quote: tamnun
                  Do not jump off the topic, it always happens when there is nothing to answer in essence

                  I don’t jump from the topic. First, the United States openly spit on the opinion of the UN and destroy the world foundations established by the results of World War II, and then suddenly they remembered a hundred Sob Without?
                  So where was Sov Bez when Yugoslavia was bombed, who did she threaten the United States, Germany, maybe all of Europe at once?
                  Quote: tamnun
                  She attacked and continues to threaten.
                  South Korea. Japan and USA

                  Poor Americans attacked them from Korea. Well, at least the United States did not write here
                  Quote: tamnun
                  Without the image of the enemy S. Korea cannot exist.

                  In principle, the majority of countries in the world have such a policy that Koreans are the only ones?
                2. Vasyan1971
                  Vasyan1971 5 August 2017 15: 01
                  +4
                  Quote: tamnun
                  S. Korea cannot exist without the image of an enemy.

                  Gold words! Where would there be a giant US military-industrial complex without the existence of S. Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba, Vietnam, Libya, Iraq, Grenada (the SMS is not complete), well, to a bunch of us orphaned and poor.
                  After all, enemies of democracy and the existing world order are everywhere! Well, how can it be easy to exist here!
        4. Makarov
          Makarov 5 August 2017 14: 03
          +2
          Study the history of the issue, and then be smart ... especially the promises of the United States in the 90s regarding the provision of fuel to the DPRK in exchange for "something" ... well, the United States there deceived the North Koreans a little ...
      3. APASUS
        APASUS 5 August 2017 11: 18
        +4
        Quote: Region 34
        We consider Russia a Great country, but the conditions are set for a Great country. Weird. Why can't we put US conditions on the DPRK?

        Because we are 0,003 in the world economy, and the United States is 20%. They are well aware of what they can get to the teeth in the military sense and for this reason they do not bother us. But our economy is a very weak place, and they beat us there.
      4. spirit
        spirit 5 August 2017 12: 18
        0
        I would advise you to study the history of the Cold War, the relationship of the parties, areas of influence, etc. lol
      5. Makarov
        Makarov 5 August 2017 14: 01
        0
        And the words about the status of the Russian Federation as a colony "wildly" sounding 5 years ago against this background look quite logical ... and most importantly, dependence on the United States can explain everything ... here is a direct answer to all your questions ... somehow strange....
      6. eklmn
        eklmn 6 August 2017 03: 01
        +3
        The questions you asked are extremely interesting! And themselves, without Channel 1, without prompting from Putin / Rogozin / Medvedev, did they try to find an answer?
        “We consider Russia to be a Great Country, but conditions are being set for a Great Country. Weird. ”Is your question.
        And your answer is here (they themselves answered, did not even notice): “Maybe that's why we wipe the snot and talk about our greatness? But if we are so great, why don't we set conditions? "
           You consider your country to be a great one, and this is great, but it is necessary that people abroad also consider it. In the meantime, they ignore you from the West with fear - the gas can be cut off at any moment, and there is a lot of nuclear weapons. 
           See for yourself - which countries are friends with Russia? Ask yourself this question - “why are our friendly countries so problematic?
           And why can't we be friends with all the neighbors? "
            
        By the way, Russia today voted in the Security Council for the American resolution on North Korea. And China voted.
          this vote was the answer to your question:
        “Are we going to enforce the interests of the United States or the interests of Russia? What is more important to us? Whose interests? "
      7. The comment was deleted.
    3. irazum
      irazum 5 August 2017 09: 58
      +1
      It should be "p ... m" put, you can and on the peas.
      1. Logall
        Logall 5 August 2017 10: 06
        +17
        If only next to Netanyahu! I was ironic at the top. And about your soup, no!
    4. Captain Pushkin
      Captain Pushkin 5 August 2017 10: 06
      +2
      Quote: Logall
      US for disobedience are going to starve the DPRK

      And also put Eun on the peas!

      The more the US puts pressure on the DPRK, the sooner the Koreans will create a hydrogen warhead and an ICBM for it.
      1. Logall
        Logall 5 August 2017 10: 35
        +16
        You know how to read! for the third time I write: IRONIZED! EUN IS ALMOST A BROTHER TO ME! And Kim Il Sung is grandpa!
      2. irazum
        irazum 5 August 2017 20: 18
        +1
        Hands shaking with hunger?
    5. svp67
      svp67 5 August 2017 10: 15
      +7
      Quote: Logall
      And also put Eun on the peas!

      And in general, why be surprised, the usual "philanthropic" "democratic" practice ... And everywhere. Someone thinks that Ukraine itself has thought of cutting off the routes of delivery of water, food and electricity to Crimea? No, it was the curators who helped, suggested how to make yourself love.
      1. tamnun
        tamnun 5 August 2017 10: 20
        0
        Quote: svp67
        Someone thinks that Ukraine itself has thought of cutting off the routes of delivery of water, food and electricity to Crimea? No, it was the curators who helped, suggested how to make yourself love.

        Indeed, well, it’s so hard to come up with. laughing
        Well, that's straight, hard.
        1. svp67
          svp67 5 August 2017 10: 27
          +5
          Quote: tamnun
          Indeed, well, it’s so hard to come up with.

          Of course it is HARD, when you are paid for all THIS in live currency, and your "kishena" is empty. And all your actions begin to fall under the violation of INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATION, where all this is formulated as "direct genocide of the local population." Without US cover, Ukraine would not have done this.
          1. tamnun
            tamnun 5 August 2017 10: 52
            +1
            Quote: svp67
            Of course, IT'S HARD when you are paid for all THIS in live currency, and your "kishena" is empty

            nor what do they pay?
            I somehow suspect that relations between Russia and Ukraine are far from friendship and a couple of dozen lemons will definitely not play the piano. But they will force Russia to invest in lards.
            Quote: svp67
            And all your actions begin to fall under the violation of INTERNATIONAL LEGISLATION

            Which one? Ukraine does not block the natural flow of rivers. It is a canal for water supply - a water pipeline (such as a gas pipeline wink ) only water.
            I want to sell to another state, I want - no.
            Am I interpreting correctly?
            Quote: svp67
            where all this is formulated as "direct genocide of the local population"

            Give me a link, I swear by my mother - I will believe it.
            Quote: svp67
            ... Without US cover, Ukraine would not have done this.

            Yes, okay, well, just shut off such a valve on the tap.
            1. svp67
              svp67 5 August 2017 12: 08
              +3
              Quote: tamnun
              Give me a link, I swear by my mother - I will believe it.

              Genocide (from the Greek. Γένος - clan, tribe and lat. Caedo - kill) - acts committed with the intention of destroying, in whole or in part, any national, ethnic, racial, religious or other historically established cultural and ethnic group [1] as such by:
              -killing of members of this group;
              - causing serious harm to their health;
              -measures designed to prevent childbirth in such a group;
              - removal of children from the family;
              -deliberate creation of living conditions designed for the complete or partial physical destruction of this group
              Since 1948, genocide has been recognized by the UN as an international crime

              Or do you think that the restriction in water supply, refusal to supply food and electricity does not fall under this?
              These are all FORBIDDEN METHODS
              1. tamnun
                tamnun 5 August 2017 12: 19
                0
                Quote: svp67
                - deliberate creation of living conditions designed for the complete or partial physical destruction of this group

                Quote: svp67
                Or do you think that the restriction in water supply, refusal to supply food and electricity does not fall under this?

                no, excuse me.
                I'm not talking about the fact that Crimea did not receive 100% of food, water and electricity from Ukraine, Ukraine did not blockade Crimea from all sides,
                In Crimea, there is not a single person who died of thirst and hunger.
                Sorry, does not match.
                Quote: svp67
                These are all FORBIDDEN METHODS

                what kind ?
                It is a private matter for Ukraine to sell or not.
                1. sabakina
                  sabakina 5 August 2017 13: 22
                  +7
                  tamnun, I'm not a doctor, but for God's sake, tell me, what did you take today?
                2. lance
                  lance 6 August 2017 16: 41
                  0
                  after the 20th year, everything that was needed from Ukraine would become a rudement, including the cover itself, and the Crimea was and will be the Russian Federation, and it will flourish. and mark my word, the first who will climb there will be the Germans
  2. Thrall
    Thrall 5 August 2017 08: 30
    +3
    Now Koreans will have to catch Americans and make stew out of them. smile
    1. HAM
      HAM 5 August 2017 08: 35
      +3
      Koreans eat dogs, but such dogs will not become even in a hungry year ..
      1. Thrall
        Thrall 5 August 2017 08: 40
        +1
        And what can you make of dog food? smile
        1. Logall
          Logall 5 August 2017 08: 49
          +15
          belay I look here doesn’t even smell like "maniacs". "Exclusively" Gourmet Lovers of "exceptional" food from "exceptional" MEAT!
      2. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 5 August 2017 08: 46
        +6
        Dogs are eaten not only by Koreans, but also by the Chinese, and this is by no means out of hunger, as some believe. This is the norm for the country of residence. In Africa and Indochina, they eat locusts, cockroaches, etc., which seems disgusting and unacceptable to us. So what? I realized that you wanted to put the United States below the dogs - I fully support. I wrote it for those who, due to their feeble mind (and in relation to the DPRK), believe that dogs are eaten out of hunger.
        1. Thrall
          Thrall 5 August 2017 09: 05
          +2
          But what about the Bomb from the DMB? smile
        2. Vladimirets
          Vladimirets 5 August 2017 09: 18
          +2
          Quote: rotmistr60
          In Africa and Indochina, they eat locusts, cockroaches, etc., which seems disgusting and unacceptable to us.

          In Peru, they eat cats.
        3. samoletil18
          samoletil18 5 August 2017 09: 24
          +1
          The Chinese do not eat dogs. I asked the Chinese.
          1. rotmistr60
            rotmistr60 5 August 2017 09: 28
            +1
            You need not ask, but know. They even have specialized restaurants.
            1. Thrall
              Thrall 5 August 2017 09: 45
              +2
              Quote: samoletil18
              The Chinese do not eat dogs. I asked the Chinese.

              Confirm, do not eat. Asked the dogs laughing
          2. Captain Pushkin
            Captain Pushkin 5 August 2017 10: 01
            +2
            Quote: samoletil18
            The Chinese do not eat dogs. I asked the Chinese.

            There is nothing living that is not used in Chinese cuisine.
      3. siberalt
        siberalt 5 August 2017 09: 06
        +3
        Koreans can solve the problem of stray dogs in Russia.
        1. avt
          avt 5 August 2017 09: 51
          +5
          Quote: siberalt
          Koreans can solve the problem of stray dogs in Russia.

          Do not believe it! But somehow I noticed - with the opening of a network of tents in Moscow, "Ivan San" On Preobrazhenka and Cherkizovo, stray dogs disappeared ... from the word in general. wassat bully And even with the closure of Cherkizon and these tents at stops, the population did not recover bully There are ducks, but there are no dogs, even if one or two catches the eye, they do not lie and behave like front-line scouts on a mission. bullyBut in the 90s self-propelled mongrels rode the subway!
          1. stalkerwalker
            stalkerwalker 5 August 2017 09: 57
            +5
            Quote: avt
            But in the 90s self-propelled mongrels rode the subway!

            And they also learned how to cross the carriageway of the street at a pedestrian crossing!
            wassat
            1. sabakina
              sabakina 5 August 2017 13: 29
              +4
              Quote: stalkerwalker
              Quote: avt
              But in the 90s self-propelled mongrels rode the subway!

              And they also learned how to cross the carriageway of the street at a pedestrian crossing!
              wassat

              I also thought for a long time why city dogs cross the street at the transition to green? Well, the fact that there are many footprints of people is understandable, BUT why exactly on green? Since 86 I have been working as a driver, but I still do not understand ... Countrymen, yes, goofs, they even have a car, even a wagon, on the drum!
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 5 August 2017 09: 05
      +2
      Photo caption: Owner and worker. laughing
    3. lance
      lance 6 August 2017 16: 44
      +1
      no. polish eggs and send home to relatives
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 5 August 2017 08: 33
    +2
    ... ours said in advance that they would block such a decision (words of the deputy foreign minister), and China may also support us in the UN ...
    1. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 5 August 2017 10: 32
      +1
      Quote: aszzz888
      ... ours said in advance that they would block such a decision (words of the deputy foreign minister), and China may also support us in the UN ...

      Ours do not care about the DPRK, this is the patrimony of the PRC, so the PRC will not support us in the UN, and it will scratch everyone's eyes for it, we just take the initiative to take the PRC out of the blow and show ...
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 5 August 2017 12: 25
        0
        DOCTOR ZLO... Our people do not care about the DPRK, it is the patrimony of the PRC, so the PRC will not support us in the UN,

        ... well, just the same cool laughing and most importantly, everything is already known in advance ... it resembles a sofa attack with a saber on the head ... bully
        1. DOCTOR ZLO
          DOCTOR ZLO 5 August 2017 12: 43
          +1
          Quote: aszzz888
          DOCTOR ZLO... Our people do not care about the DPRK, it is the patrimony of the PRC, so the PRC will not support us in the UN,

          ... well, just the same cool laughing and most importantly, everything is already known in advance ... it resembles a sofa attack with a saber on the head ... bully

          On the matter of what they wanted to say or want to refute my comment, I am waiting attentively, but for now, in any case, I will write you to the trolls, tk. I consider all jackals who provoke me to insult my opponent and their relatives (which is a violation of the Site Rules) as provocateurs ... (because of which you can get bans) ...
          Let's not cough ...
          1. aszzz888
            aszzz888 5 August 2017 14: 28
            +2
            but for now, in any case, I will write you to the trolls, tk. all jackals, who provoke me

            ... throw off the steam, it will tear it apart ... but about the Site Rules - do not break it yourself (in bold) - this is an insult ...
            In the case of what they wanted to say
            ... and I don't want to have any business with you, it's dumb ... bully
  4. DEPARTMENT
    DEPARTMENT 5 August 2017 08: 33
    +5
    Eun is there on the site, he didn't give me anything ...? In general, the DPRK clearly sent the United States! The only country that "talks" to them as needed, without liberal tricks ..! And because they understand them hi
    1. irazum
      irazum 5 August 2017 09: 21
      +2
      This will not affect the Tolstomordov's table in any way, but ordinary Koreans, once again, will have to poke an extra hole in the belt ...
    2. Chaos
      Chaos 5 August 2017 09: 41
      +3
      But South Korea doesn’t creep out. As a result, they are taller and we drive Hyundai, we buy Samsung
      1. Maxim Sheludyakov
        Maxim Sheludyakov 5 August 2017 10: 12
        +4
        You can also send your wife to the panel - you will ride the gelding and call the iPhone
  5. Rostislav
    Rostislav 5 August 2017 08: 34
    +3
    I doubt that Russia will support such a resolution.
  6. Observer2014
    Observer2014 5 August 2017 08: 35
    +5
    Well then, declare the American sanctions against the DPRK genocide.
    1. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 5 August 2017 08: 40
      +3
      Quote: Observer2014
      Well then, declare the American sanctions against the DPRK genocide.


      To declare is not a question, who in the UN Security Council will vote for this ?! On such a resolution, the United States will veto.
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 5 August 2017 08: 40
    +1
    Hegemons, ... They are confident in the support of Russia and China! This is such a form of pressure - "we are sure that you will do the right thing ..." Well, you bring it in, you bring it in. And then we'll see how Russia and China will listen to you.
    1. lance
      lance 6 August 2017 16: 48
      0
      Well, we know how the sanctions helped us, now the entire leadership of the Russian Federation wants the same DPRK
  8. midshipman
    midshipman 5 August 2017 08: 42
    +15
    North Korea is a very interesting country. I had to go there, I had to master the production of a new MiG fighter. I was responsible for the equipment for him in the profile of my GU MRP USSR. We completed the task and, on behalf of KIM IR SENA, I was presented with an electric table lamp with a Korean ornament on a vertical stand. I take care of her. The DPRK needs help as we did in the 50s. We are not on our way with the United States, but if we, together with the PRC, do not abandon the DPRK, the world will be different, it will be friendly. I have the honor.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 5 August 2017 09: 28
    +5
    It was Stalin who made the famine, and Roosevelt, for humane purposes, suggested that the hungry go on a diet. They died from the diet (twice as many, in the USSR). ULAG were in the USSR, and in the USA - labor armies. It was in the USSR that peoples were deported, and in the USA, they were “humanely isolated in concentration camps”).
    In general, these homonitarians are green, blue, pink, with red stripes and white stars on a blue background ...
    1. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 5 August 2017 10: 45
      +1
      pafegosoff ULAG were in the USSR, and in the USA - labor armies. It was in the USSR that peoples were deported, and in the USA, they were “humanely isolated in concentration camps”).

      That is true, but the time intervals for the existence of these events were different ...
      1. Yegorchik
        Yegorchik 5 August 2017 12: 03
        0
        Quote: DOCTOR ZLO

        That is true, but the time intervals for the existence of these events were different ...

        What is this brain juice I just read?
  11. Vlad5307
    Vlad5307 5 August 2017 09: 34
    +4
    Well, they are not accustomed to starving peoples and infections - the history of the creation of the SGA is a confirmation of this. Let all who disagree with them die - this is their slogan and policy! fool
  12. Operator
    Operator 5 August 2017 10: 47
    +5
    The DPRK is potentially the richest country in the world in terms of per capita income, judging by its proven reserves of rare earth metals worth several trillion dollars.

    The North Koreans have to hold out under the sanctions for 2-3 years during the construction of the mining and processing plants, after which they will be able to buy in China and Russia, wholesale and retail, whatever their heart desires, including such trifles as food. Therefore, the United States is preemptive and is trying to escalate a military conflict on the Korean Peninsula.

    Moreover, South Korea, with mastered Western technologies, will gladly join its wealthy northern relatives, who are also members of the international nuclear missile club, and expel the so-called. UN troops (de facto US troops). After which the united Korea will demand satisfaction from Japan for the occupation of 1905-45.
    1. tamnun
      tamnun 5 August 2017 10: 59
      +1
      Quote: Operator
      The DPRK is potentially the richest country in the world in terms of per capita income, judging by its proven reserves of rare earth metals worth several trillion dollars.
      North Koreans have to hold out under the sanctions for 2-3 years during the construction of mining and processing plants, after which they will be able to buy in China and Russia wholesale and retail whatever their heart desires, including such trifles as food.

      Here's what I like about talking about socialist countries is that they are the RICHEST and you have to hold out for nothing - just a couple more years and then they will buy EVERYTHING, including FOOD laughing
      Of course . no one should have a question, but what is so bad with a zhrachka - if in order to buy IT and EVERYTHING, you have to build something again and again wait a few years laughing
      Quote: Operator
      Moreover, South Korea, with its Western technology mastered, will happily join its wealthy northern cousins.

      Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah laughing
      Forgot to write --- WITH GREAT PLEASURE
      Quote: Operator
      After which the united Korea will demand satisfaction from Japan for the occupation of 1905-45.

      1. DOCTOR ZLO
        DOCTOR ZLO 5 August 2017 11: 05
        +6
        tamnun

        Quote: Operator
        After which the united Korea will demand satisfaction from Japan for the occupation of 1905-45.

        Those. only Israeli Jews have the right to compensation for "stoves", but you are an Israeli nationalist, every nation has its own "Holocaust", and not just Jews ...

        Never trusted Israeli Jews ...
        1. tamnun
          tamnun 5 August 2017 11: 20
          +1
          Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
          Never trusted Israeli Jews ...

          I don’t know how I’ll continue to live with this? request
          1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Operator
        Operator 5 August 2017 11: 26
        +4
        tamnun

        It is not good to envy other people's wealth (natural resources, mastered technologies, nuclear missiles, friendly relations with neighboring countries) - especially Israel, which is kept by the United States and is at knives with all its neighbors.

        Judging by your comment, the Israelis have another lesson (USSR, China, Iran, North Korea) not for the future: you have a simple truth whistling between your ears, why the state needs to build up its nuclear missile potential in the first place, and secondly to solve the problem of food supply. At the same time, you do not understand how self-reliance differs from the position of a servant "what you please".

        PS The official conclusion on the reserves of rare earth metals in North Korea was made by an American exploration company hired by the government of Kim Jong-un.
        1. tamnun
          tamnun 5 August 2017 11: 38
          +1
          Quote: Operator
          It is not good to envy someone else's wealth (natural resources, mastered technologies, nuclear missiles, friendly relations with neighboring countries) - especially Israel,

          Are you talking about the DPRK?
          Are you in an alternate universe?

          Quote: Operator
          Judging by your comment, the Israelis have another lesson (USSR, China, Iran, North Korea) not for the future: why does the state need to build up its nuclear missile potential in the first place, and secondly to solve the problem of food supply?

          And what does China have to do with it?
          Quote: Operator
          At the same time, you do not understand how self-reliance differs from the position of a kept woman

          do not write nonsense.
          Quote: Operator
          PS The official conclusion on the reserves of rare earth metals in North Korea was made by an American exploration company hired by the government of Kim Jong-un.

          strange, written - British, in 2014 found and?
          Are they already building GOKs? wink
          What about the market for rare earth metals per year?
          Lanthanum, lanthanides, scandium and yttrium are rare earth metals, without which modern high-tech devices and installations, from a mobile phone to a nuclear reactor, cannot exist. It so happened that in recent years, all the rare earths necessary for the world - 125 thousand tons per year - were supplied by China.
          The annual market turnover today is estimated at 4.8 billion.

          the whole market laughing
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Operator
            Operator 5 August 2017 12: 08
            +4
            That's right - British. That is why the EU has recently at once stopped criticizing Kim Jong-un for human rights violations and did not join Trump's provocations - on the horizon looming profit from participation in the extraction and processing of North Korean natural resources, obviously.

            Today's turnover of the international market for rare earth metals is determined by the high level of prices for them, which in turn depend on small developed reserves. The demand for rare earth metals is orders of magnitude higher (power electronics, gas turbines, electric accumulators, etc.), which the DPRK can more than satisfy. Plus the cheapness of the local labor force.

            Israel contrasts sharply with the Juche ideology (self-reliance): American investments, American electronics industry, French nuclear weapons, French cruise missiles, American aircraft, German warships.
            Purely Israeli - plastic hydroponic vegetables and fruits.
    2. Normal ok
      Normal ok 5 August 2017 16: 49
      0
      Quote: Operator
      DPRK is potentially the richest country in the world

      Eun's witness, however laughing laughing laughing
      1. Operator
        Operator 5 August 2017 18: 25
        0
        Abydna, daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? laughing

        Euns come and go, our neighbor Korea remains.
  13. Egorovich
    Egorovich 5 August 2017 11: 01
    +6
    Russia will definitely block this resolution. It can be stupid that the DPRK is using coal, seafood and labor force to create missile technology. Dibilism and idiocy are uttermost.
  14. Old26
    Old26 5 August 2017 11: 52
    +5
    Quote: Region 34
    In our country today, only the United States imposes conditions on everyone and imposes sanctions. Why does Russia never put conditions on the United States?

    Do we have the ability to set conditions for the United States? Economically, how far are we behind America?

    Quote: 34 region
    We consider Russia a Great country, but the conditions are set for a Great country. Weird. Why can't we put US conditions on the DPRK?

    Russia is indeed a great country. This is evidenced by its thousand-year history. But when it comes to the economy, here, alas, we are not a Great country. And you can set (political) conditions only by backing it up with your own economy. We are unable to STATE US terms on the DPRK. We can only diplomatically achieve the acceptance or non-acceptance of certain conditions (resolutions) using our veto

    Quote: 34 region
    Are we afraid of the USA or can't we physically?

    You yourself answered your own question with the second part of the question

    Quote: 34 region
    The United States has set up its bases in Japan and the South Caucasus, but the DPRK is to blame!

    Well, this is rather a stamp for the media of guilt in the entire DPRK. Although the actions of the current leader of the DPRK indirectly confirm this. He does everything in such a way that the Americans are actually deploying new weapons systems there that are not beneficial to us.

    Quote: 34 region
    The DPRK cannot develop its science and armaments, but the United States can !? The United States can poke its bases everywhere, and the DPRK cannot defend its territory!

    Nobody is stopping the DPRK from developing its science and weapons. And to develop forces to protect their territory, which, to be honest, nafig nobody needs. For more than 60 years, no one has touched it, has not invaded. Although in the days of the 90s, if desired, this could be done elementary. Russia was weak, China had not yet risen. However, no one captured ...
    With regard to the development of science. To do this, it is enough to watch at least the parades in the DPRK with a difference of 10 years in order to understand what a leap in science and armaments the DPRK has made. The question is somewhat different. Having signed a nuclear nonproliferation treaty in due time, North Korea began its creation. And the creation of delivery vehicles. Nobody objected or "indignant" when North Korea built its missiles with a range of up to 1000-1500 km. This was quite enough to protect the interests of the DPRK from neighboring countries (Japan, South Korea). However, the DPRK did not think this was enough. We went to develop missiles with a range of 3-4 thousand kilometers and intercontinental ones. Why does the DPRK need complexes of this range? Attack America or someone else? UN sanctions followed on this topic

    All attempts to reason with the DPRK by ending its nuclear program have also been unsuccessful, either in our country or in the United States. But the proposals were the most profitable for the DPRK. We (and then the Americans) proposed to build a nuclear power plant in North Korea instead of ending our military nuclear program. As far as I remember, we were going to first install 4 VVER-440 reactors, and then we decided to supply 3, but more power - VVER-660. But we got "from the gate - a turn." The same was proposed by the Americans, proposing to build a nuclear power plant on light-water reactors. But even then nothing came of it.
    About the fact that the United States can poke its bases everywhere. Alas, this is the lot of all powerful countries. And the United States, whether we like it or not, after the collapse of the Union remained the only superpower. The USSR, when it was at its peak of power, could "set up" its bases everywhere. Therefore, we had them in Yemen, and in Mozambique, Somalia and Ethiopia, Angola, Cuba, Algeria, Vietnam. WE DIDN'T ASK FOR PERMISSION FROM ANYONE, because there were SUPERPOWER... The Americans do the same. NO ONE do not ask. you need a base - they put it. And sometimes they just buy certain governments

    Quote: 34 region
    And let's put conditions on the USA too! Let the US remove its bases from Japan and the South Caucasus!

    Let's. For this alone, Russia must become a country with the # 1 economy in the world. Then you can set the conditions

    Quote: 34 region
    Do nuclear missiles of the DPRK threaten Japan, the South Caucasus and the United States? No question! You are removing your bases, the DPRK is removing its missiles and placing nuclear missiles on Russia!

    When the DPRK has an economy such as to set conditions to which they will listen - then it is possible that there will be no bases in Japan and South Korea. Although all this is from the field of unscientific fiction. Each country, and above all the United States, decides its own interests. And it is in the interests of the United States to have its bases there. At one time, the Americans withdrew their tactical nuclear weapons from the territory of the South Caucasus. I would not be surprised that if Eun continues to "break", it will return there, since it is beneficial to the United States.

    Quote: 34 region
    And did the US bases in Japan and the South Caucasus threaten anyone? No? Well, Russian missiles, too, will not threaten anyone!

    When you ask such questions, sorry, there are doubts about your age. They look very childish. An adult will not ask a question whether or not there are military bases near the territory of the country, no matter whether Russia or the DPRK

    Quote: 34 region
    Here, many are trying to talk about the supply of food by kind Americans to the DPRK. So Russia can also feed!

    Do not try. These are realities. For the period 1995-2011 (note the last figure) the amount of food supplied under humanitarian programs to the DPRK was 12,39 million tons. South Korea is in first place with 3,3, China is in second - 3,02, and the United States is in third - 2,4 million tons. In monetary terms, the food supplied by the United States was estimated at more than $ 1 billion. Good Americans or not - judge for yourself.
    Can Russia feed? A HZ. Maybe it can, but not in such volumes as the USA, China or South Korea.

    Quote: 34 region
    And not humanitarian, but in exchange for the products of the DPRK. Why not?

    Try to announce the entire list of DPRK products that Russia can export. Minerals - yes, but not PRODUCTS.

    Quote: 34 region
    An interesting situation. Russia is under pressure, but it does not even kick and does not put forward any conditions! Russia immediately recognizes itself as a victim and patient and expresses deep concern! And in the face to give?

    No, exactly? to mean the anti-sanctions introduced by Russia are fiction. You know, as Panikovsky once said from the famous film6 "Shura, you go to Kiev and ask. No, you go to Kiev and ask."
    Only you should not go to Kiev, but to Turkey or Europe and talk to agricultural producers there. What they cost the retaliatory measures of Russia. And you propose to give in the face? Send troops somewhere in Europe? No? Bang nuclear missiles at the same Europe? Also no? So in Sanchez then your call is expressed "to hit in the face"?

    Quote: 34 region
    Why are we afraid? Are you addicted? Losing the last piece of bread and foreign accounts? Maybe that's why we're not butting?

    Yes, we are not afraid to lose a piece of bread. We have enough of it. But in a situation where, after the 90s, the country begins to slowly rise from its knees to arrange another war ("kick in the face") - this is very wise and far-sighted ...
    1. lance
      lance 6 August 2017 17: 08
      0
      old you contradict yourself: we are not a great country in economic terms, but at the same time we can destroy the United States with one salvo of our IBRs, since about the United States = 0 even today. 2-our Russian Federation is robbed by all and sundry, this is a fact, but we do not die of hunger and laugh at Gref and Kudrin. 3 according to all the parameters of sanctions, we must beg, and we choose what can be sold to China and what not. 4 the “impoverished country” has a growing gold and foreign exchange reserve and the country chooses which currency to reserve, maybe the yuan? 5 if the Russian Federation dumps all Treasury securities at a bargain price and all dollars and abandons them as currency? and realizing this will support us if they are not really ... China? but everything goes to this, well, and ...
  15. Staff
    Staff 5 August 2017 12: 15
    +1
    There, and so everyone is starving. Except for the chubby hamster.
  16. DOCTOR ZLO
    DOCTOR ZLO 5 August 2017 12: 23
    +1
    Quote: Egorchik
    Quote: DOCTOR ZLO

    That is true, but the time intervals for the existence of these events were different ...

    What is this brain juice I just read?

    Quit this business, reading is not yours ...
  17. Panzermensch
    Panzermensch 5 August 2017 12: 32
    +2
    And let them blame, no one is interested in this unfortunate state. The fat-ass Korean decided to fight the world at the expense of his own population. A worthy descendant of the communist regime. I don’t think that anyone in the world will regret it, on the contrary, the suffering of people will stop and they will go to a better world, and this is a blessing, but the southerners will have so much room to live.
    1. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 5 August 2017 13: 32
      +3
      Quote: Panzermensch
      And let them blame, no one is interested in this unfortunate state. The fat-ass Korean decided to fight the world at the expense of his own population.

      Sin is a young man to wish evil to people, you are evil by definition, repent ...
      A worthy descendant of the communist regime.

      Most of this site are descendants of the communist regime. were born in the USSR ...
      I don't think that anyone in the world will regret it, on the contrary, the suffering of people will stop and they will go to a better world, and this is good

      Go out the window, check this thesis ...
      but the southerners will have so much room to live

      G.Kh. Andersen, you are not a relative, name at least one country where there is a US WB and live there as they want (local population) ...
    2. 72jora72
      72jora72 5 August 2017 14: 07
      +1
      I don't think anyone in the world will regret it,
      Judging by your comments, you cannot think by definition, because there is nothing.
  18. stalkerwalker
    stalkerwalker 5 August 2017 12: 35
    +5
    tamnun,
    Quote: tamnun
    Surprise for you?
    You also tell me that the United States fought on the side of South Korea, and not the UN troops in accordance with the resolution of the Sov.

    Do not pretend to be the sole knowledge of History. Otherwise I will remind you of the Tonkin incident, "UN aviation in the skies of Yugoslavia", "Powell's test tube", "no-fly zone in Libya", "peaceful coalition" in the sky of Syria ...
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 5 August 2017 13: 05
      +4
      I hope our country and China will veto this "cannibalistic" resolution prepared by the United States.
      But in any case, now the people of the DPRK already have weapons that will allow them to inflict "unacceptable" damage on the invaders in the person of the United States and its satellites.
      We love the world
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. padded jacket
          padded jacket 5 August 2017 13: 27
          +3
          Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
          Israeli Jews will never have such a carefree ... life

          They (USA, Israel, etc.) build their whole life on admiration for the "Golden Calf", that is, the cretery of their personal happiness is as much as possible the presence of shekels dollars and so on, and how you got them is not important, therefore, in terms of "spirituality" they are far from the DPRK. So it was in the USSR, unfortunately, he was "killed" and many of us, having succumbed to "promises" about future material benefits, unfortunately took part in this.
          1. Normal ok
            Normal ok 5 August 2017 16: 46
            0
            Quote: quilted jacket
            They (USA, Israel, etc.) build their whole life on the worship of the "Golden Calf

            Type in Russia and North. Korea is wrong laughing
            1. padded jacket
              padded jacket 5 August 2017 16: 59
              +1
              Quote: Normal ok
              Type in Russia and North. Korea is wrong

              Well, you for the whole of Russia, then do not say, maybe if you personally, and so it does not mean that everyone else has also forgotten "about pride and freedom"
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. DOCTOR ZLO
            DOCTOR ZLO 5 August 2017 20: 25
            +1
            Quote: Headquarters
            Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
            Israeli Jews will never have such a carefree ... life, I hope ...

            He farted in the bath again. This will not harm anyone, you and your loved ones will still have to sniff lol

            If you farted, trying to prove that Israel has a carefree life for you and your loved ones, next time coordinate your comment with the editor-in-chief who pays you money for the nonsense that you write here ...
  19. 72jora72
    72jora72 5 August 2017 13: 43
    +2
    Quote: tamnun
    No, I think there are adequate people in the Foreign Ministry and they understand that you can, of course, write out populist slogans, but Eun with nuclear weapons is a problem for everyone, including Russia.

    And YOU, with your nuclear weapons, whose problem is ???
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. Normal ok
    Normal ok 5 August 2017 16: 45
    +1
    They themselves have long been "stuck"
  22. Old26
    Old26 5 August 2017 17: 07
    0
    Quote: avt
    We will certainly reproach someone when you say who exactly after the signing, well, let's just say - the refusal of nuclear weapons in exchange for food, banned the supply of this very food

    I don’t know, comrade, out of knowledge or on purpose, but you are misleading people. Probably confused with another program.
    There was such a program "Oil for food", which operated within the UN from 1995 to 2003. But in IRAQ., In order not to give Iraq the opportunity to restore the army, but nevertheless, so that people do not suffer from a shortage of food, medicine, essential goods
    In the DPRK, things were a little different. The agreement concluded between the DPRK and the United States (1994) provided in response to the elimination of the North Korean nuclear program for the construction of nuclear power plants with 2 reactors of 1000 MW each and the supply of fuel oil for thermal power plants in the DPRK. But the North Koreans quietly continued work on the military program and EMNIP in 2002, President Bush suspended the supply of heating oil to Korea. Fuel oil, not food. When and in what quantities food was supplied - in the tables below


    Quote: Vasyan1971
    Do not starve desperate guys with hunger!

    Who starves them?

    Quote: quilted jacket
    I hope our country and China will veto this "cannibalistic" resolution prepared by the United States.

    I do not hope, but almost completely, 100% sure, since our Foreign Ministry has already stated that it supported sanctions of an exclusively military nature, but not sanctions that would lead to another mass famine and economic strangulation of the DPRK. For sanctions must fall
    1. Export from the DPRK of fish and fish products
    2. Hard coal
    3. Lead
    4. Iron ore.
    5. Prohibition of hiring labor force in the DPRK
    Some congressman generally agreed that Russia should be deprived of the holding of the 2018 FIFA World Cup, because it is not excluded that the slave labor of North Korean workers is being used (used) in the construction of such facilities.
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 5 August 2017 17: 21
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      I do not hope, but almost completely, 100% sure

      Well, rightly so (we will not go into details with the DPRK), this situation just looks ridiculous, we ourselves are under US economic sanctions and at the same time helps the US to "impose" economic sanctions on other countries.
      Quote: Old26
      For sanctions must fall
      1. Export from the DPRK of fish and fish products
      2. Hard coal
      3. Lead
      4. Iron ore.
      5. Prohibition of hiring labor force in the DPRK

      Like the bans that the United States wants to impose more:
      UN Security Council to discuss sanctions against DPRK
  23. Old26
    Old26 5 August 2017 17: 42
    +1
    Quote: quilted jacket
    The kind of bans that the United States wants to impose is great

    Perhaps. This is what I read and remember. In any case, the export of foodstuffs from the UK (when they themselves live there from hand to mouth) is in no way connected with their military programs. The impossibility of working for North Korean workers in other countries, at least somehow, can be explained. Small but source of currency
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 5 August 2017 19: 57
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      In any case, the export of foodstuffs from the UK (when they themselves live there from hand to mouth) is in no way connected with their military programs. The impossibility of working for North Korean workers in other countries, at least somehow, can be explained. Small but source of currency

      The most interesting thing that the United States wants to do is a ban on joint ventures between the DPRK and other countries, and after all, the DPRK has a lot of joint companies with China, so China will also apparently be against this resolution.

      Can you tell me who Eun is talking to during the launch of Hwaseong-14? Directly they are somehow similar - equally trimmed and densely built.

  24. Music
    Music 5 August 2017 18: 27
    +1
    And it's time for us to abandon the World Cup-18 ourselves. For he binds us hand and foot!
  25. Alexander Abdrakhmanov
    Alexander Abdrakhmanov 5 August 2017 19: 47
    0
    Americans forget that genocide is also a great crime. Hungry fanaticism is even more dangerous when the people have nothing to lose, they will do anything. The United States wants to break the nuclear weapons agreement at the expense of the DPRK, and again wants to throw an arms race. They didn’t stop it, in my opinion, only excuses followed. They put this time bomb under themselves. When they start it, there is no stopping it.
  26. Old26
    Old26 5 August 2017 21: 48
    +1
    .
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Can you tell me who Eun is talking to during the launch of Hwaseong-14? Directly they are somehow similar - equally trimmed and densely built.

    The question is certainly interesting ... I only know from open sources that he was accompanied by Lee Byung Chor, Kim Rak Kyom, Kim Jong Sik, Zhang Chang Ha, Jong Il Ho, Yoo Jin and Jo Yong Won. But which of them is in the photo - alas, I don’t know.
  27. Guest171-Again
    Guest171-Again 6 August 2017 01: 39
    0
    These hegemons, damn it, well, they will raise anyone (in the sense of Der. Um. And Dem.)
  28. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 6 August 2017 06: 46
    0
    US for disobedience are going to starve the DPRK


    And the Russians that are not going to? Russia supported the UN Security Council resolution on the introduction of additional sanctions against the DPRK. Well, how does it feel to be two-faced? Have American "partners" already "patted the head"?
  29. Leonid Har
    Leonid Har 6 August 2017 07: 12
    +1
    one of the American congressmen, said that Russia should be deprived of the right to host the 2018 FIFA World Cup, since "the labor of North Korean workers is mercilessly exploited during the construction of stadiums."

    The State Department has already stated that "they are confident in the support of the resolution on the part of Russia and China in the UN Security Council"

    From what pies Russia should support the "world hegemon" pressing on Russia?
    On the contrary, countries experiencing sanctions from the United States - Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, Qatar, Cuba need to rally against the United States and call on the next potential rogue candidates for this.
  30. Love is
    Love is 6 August 2017 16: 57
    0
    Photo caption
    "Juche plays tic-tac-toe wisely"
  31. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 6 August 2017 19: 58
    0
    I will say one thing: everything is disgusting.
    Both Merikans and Koreans.
    And there is no way out.
    Hey, lovers of the USSR, lure the DPRK to Russia. And the PRC there too. Anyway, live a month in the conditions of the reign of Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev somewhere in 1966 ...
  32. MadCat
    MadCat 7 August 2017 00: 11
    +1
    Bobblehead coped without the United States, no one could have starved to death more successfully. Considering that there is no blockade by Russia and China ...
    Why the US is obliged to feed these blackmailers with weapons of mass destruction is not clear to me personally.
    1. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 7 August 2017 07: 34
      +2
      Israeli Jews also possess nuclear weapons and also do not participate in the same international conventions and also threaten and do this against their neighbors, but no one imposes sanctions on Israel, your propaganda campaign would have worked 20 years ago ... and now it’s funny to read you .. ...
      1. MadCat
        MadCat 7 August 2017 14: 33
        +1
        Israel did not threaten any nuclear weapons, did not sign the NPT and, thanks to the agreement, did not receive the technology for the production of reactors. Moreover, no one has yet provided evidence of its presence ... And enough to get off the topic.
        You still haven't answered the question, are the DPRK blocked from the border of the Russian Federation and China? Divorced fans of North Korean ghouls, from afar, of course. Who besides the authorities of the DPRK is to blame for the famine, in their own words, in a completely self-sufficient state? Why should the Americans deal with food supplies, and not the Russian Federation or China?
        1. Pancir026
          Pancir026 7 August 2017 14: 54
          0
          Quote: MadCat
          You still haven't answered the question, are the DPRK blocked from the border of the Russian Federation and China?

          Why on earth? We are like the opinion of the American, as you put it, ghouls are not a decree.
          Quote: MadCat
          Who besides the authorities of the DPRK is to blame for the famine, in their own words, in a completely self-sufficient state?

          U.S. Policy: What's Not Clear?
          and with the famine in the DPRK. dealt with. What are you all yelling about?
          Quote: MadCat
          Why should the Americans deal with food supplies, and not the Russian Federation or China?

          Get busy.
          Even if you do something useful for the world, the world sees nothing but blood, destruction and catastrophes from you.
          And lastly, the DPRK received assistance of 1.5 billion in 10 years. Israel-3 billion every year. What about a permanent drought with floods and a complete hunger?
          1. MadCat
            MadCat 7 August 2017 17: 40
            +1
            Quote: Pancir026
            U.S. Policy: What's Not Clear?
            and with the famine in the DPRK. dealt with. What are you all yelling about?

            and how should they react to the blackmail of nuclear weapons, send flowers to the doll?
            Quote: Pancir026
            and with the famine in the DPRK. dealt with. What are you all yelling about?

            the headline screams about hunger.

            Quote: Pancir026
            Even if you do something useful for the world, the world sees nothing but blood, destruction and catastrophes from you.

            you better tell an entertaining story who, after the demarcation, attacked South Korea? And why did the troops in South Korea receive the UN mandate to protect? Don't remember what is inconvenient?
        2. DOCTOR ZLO
          DOCTOR ZLO 7 August 2017 21: 42
          +1
          MadCat
          Israel did not threaten anyone with nuclear weapons

          Are you pretending to be orphans again? You threaten with conventional weapons (and use them without UN sanctions) against weaker neighbors, and if neighboring countries were militarily as strong as you, you would definitely use nuclear weapons ...
          The NPT did not sign

          They themselves admitted, as did the treaty banning chemical weapons, anti-personnel mines, transfer of dual-use technologies ...
          I did not receive reactor production technology

          Do not tell my slippers, in the hungry 48th they themselves were honored to make from cacti ...
          Moreover, no one has yet provided evidence of its presence ...

          Someone presented evidence of the presence of nuclear weapons in the DPRK, net ... Just don't (it will be said at bedtime, shake the test tubes with washing powder here) ..
          And that's enough to get off the topic.

          what topic would a young man rave about
          There is the DPRK, which lives quietly, not only without military and economic, incl. gratuitous aid, but also under US sanctions ...
          And there is Israel not a day able to live without the United States ...
          Israeli Jews think that they have caught God for ...
          You still haven't answered the question, are the DPRK blocked from the border of the Russian Federation and China?

          Not at all. From Russia in this millennium they will definitely not be blocked ... they do not bother us, good workers, hardworking and fought with us in the Second World War against common enemies ...
          Divorced fans of North Korean ghouls, from far away, of course.

          RF is closer to Israel, or you only have the Globe of Israel ..?
          Who besides the authorities of the DPRK is to blame for the famine, in their own words, in a completely self-sufficient state?

          You're right, it's not ours, it's true, you left the Union, so you roam where it is nourishing and warmer ...

          WITHOUT YOU AND YOU LIKE ...
          Why Americans should supply food

          When did your master supply more food to the DPRK than to the PRC? Overdoing it young man with your editorial assignment ...
          Let's not cough, I would tell you a couple of gentle ones about you, but the site rules prohibit insulting your opponents and their relatives ...
  33. Old26
    Old26 7 August 2017 07: 50
    0
    Quote: pafegosoff
    I will say one thing: everything is disgusting.
    Both Merikans and Koreans.
    And there is no way out.
    Hey, lovers of the USSR, lure the DPRK to Russia. And the PRC there too. Anyway, live a month in the conditions of the reign of Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev somewhere in 1966 ...

    Let's leave the PRC and the DPRK alone. What did you personally not like the reign of Leonid Ilyich in 1968? Not in the late 70s, not in the early 80s, but in 1968?