Military Review

The Russian military prevented an attack on Damascus, using the latest MANPADS

37
Russian calculations of the newest portable Verba anti-aircraft missile system destroyed the terrorist drone Hayat Tahrir ash-Sham (Dzhebhat Al-Nusra), which was used to adjust the fire of militants in Damascus, including the quarter with the Russian embassy.

37 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Wedmak
    Wedmak 3 August 2017 11: 47
    +3
    Merry music.
    1. Manul
      Manul 9 August 2017 23: 14
      0
      Quote: Wedmak
      Merry music.

      I didn’t like it. Type / o cheap series or plain-looking comedy. The film is a complete production. Unloading from an airplane, then from a truck, unpacking, demonstration .. It sucks. It became a shame for the directors and VO that they began to spread such nonsense. Where are the videos and facts of a downed drone? What does the incomprehensible video sequence have to do with it?
  2. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 3 August 2017 13: 18
    0
    Quote: Wedmak
    Merry music.

    come on!
  3. Dr. Hub
    Dr. Hub 3 August 2017 13: 22
    +4
    Maybe I don’t understand what in this life? But isn't it too expensive a treat? From guns on sparrows. Is there anything simpler for a drone?
    1. pofigist_26_eng
      pofigist_26_eng 3 August 2017 13: 51
      +13
      on the contrary, the UAV is a difficult target for air defense systems because of the small reflective surface and the ability to make fairly sophisticated techniques for avoiding fire from the ground (depending on the model). So, consider this a system check in real conditions.
    2. NickiShnapi
      NickiShnapi 4 August 2017 10: 14
      +4
      This very sparrow can bring serious problems, so everything is justified.
    3. dmitry.kashkaryow
      dmitry.kashkaryow 4 August 2017 15: 36
      +2
      You do not understand that this "sparrow" is a gunner.
    4. Dead duck
      Dead duck 4 August 2017 18: 14
      +7
      Quote: Dr. Hub
      Maybe I don’t understand what in this life? But isn't it too expensive a treat?

      War is generally an expensive pleasure, in the literal and figurative sense.
    5. would
      would 5 August 2017 13: 03
      0
      This is the whole problem of UAVs. They are relatively cheap, but it is an incredibly difficult target: small size, low reflectivity, low emissivity of anything at all, and the ability to hang at least at an altitude of 2 km. Mute the connection? A number of models are possible, but the problem is that they can continue to perform the task in automatic mode. Just shoot down, and because of the above qualities, the rocket simply has nothing to visit. And you have to beat them with the most modern anti-aircraft missiles, simply because there is really nothing more. Well, of course, you can collect a bunch of ... 57mm automatic cannons with ammunition with a programmable fuse and shoot down a bunch of bk, but the problem is that they are usually not at hand.
  4. Starik72
    Starik72 3 August 2017 14: 07
    +4
    But isn’t it easier to use electronic warfare against UAVs, since shooting with portable missiles is tantamount to firing sparrows from a cannon. Yes, and much cheaper.
    1. romanru4
      romanru4 4 August 2017 09: 24
      +12
      The actions of our military in the SAR must be perceived through the prism of a large landfill in full size.
    2. dm-itry
      dm-itry 4 August 2017 09: 33
      +3
      A new technique where to test if not in combat conditions.
    3. would
      would 5 August 2017 13: 03
      0
      Well, you apply electronic warfare, well, let's suppress the control signal. And the UAV will continue to carry out the programmed task in automatic mode. So, what is next?
    4. ded100
      ded100 7 August 2017 12: 11
      +1
      When it’s crippling, you’ll shoot from the gun by the sparrow, the main thing is that the result is shot down, it’s justified! good
    5. SergF123
      SergF123 7 August 2017 15: 18
      0
      It was possible, and it was possible to land him, having seized control, BUT - the campaign is not a "predator" and its value is extremely small, it is necessary to shoot down, well, not Su-35, to send him down from guns! Saw - destroyed! All right!
  5. 32363
    32363 3 August 2017 14: 14
    +1
    there are powerful Chinese laser pointers, the network is full of video how they are destroyed by quadrocopters, why not use something like that?
    1. dm-itry
      dm-itry 4 August 2017 09: 33
      +1
      Did you understand what you wrote? :)))
      1. Serzh
        Serzh 4 August 2017 09: 51
        0
        Well, in general, he wrote about a new development at the household level of unmanned aircraft counteraction systems)))
        By the way, there is a rational grain.
        1. NG inform
          NG inform 5 August 2017 02: 31
          0
          Laser weapons are not particularly used because of their low efficiency, first of all. Fast scattering, dependence on air conditions, the need for line of sight. A particularly high power of the laser beam ionizes the air, as a result of which the already short range decreases even more. In short, if it made sense, then the USSR was a pioneer in lasers and these weapons would have been used with us since the 70s.
    2. rasteer
      rasteer 8 August 2017 08: 01
      0
      Chinese laser pointers are really terrible weapons capable of shooting down even geostationary satellites. The only problem is that for their effective use, a carrier based on superman so or iron man laughing
  6. 3officer
    3officer 3 August 2017 15: 53
    0
    Under the tail of the "partners" this must be driven, and not on the "cats" will train.
  7. - = ANTRAX = -
    - = ANTRAX = - 4 August 2017 07: 20
    0
    How was aiming at such an unusual target?
  8. duchy
    duchy 4 August 2017 10: 18
    0
    Testing and combat testing of our equipment, so that penguins do not rock the boat, the next target will probably be a “coalition” aircraft.
  9. Music
    Music 4 August 2017 11: 06
    +1
    Have you experienced Verba? Everything is better than in battles near Mariupol. Or Kakhovka. It will be too late to study there.
    1. Walanin
      Walanin 4 August 2017 17: 05
      +2
      not tested and shot a commercial
  10. Walanin
    Walanin 4 August 2017 15: 21
    +1
    It is not visible where the drones are and it is generally not visible that anything was hit.
    1. dmitry.kashkaryow
      dmitry.kashkaryow 4 August 2017 15: 38
      0
      So it’s not shot on Mosfilm!
      1. Walanin
        Walanin 4 August 2017 16: 52
        +1
        And where? The video clearly used professional equipment, thought out lighting, stage setting and very good editing. Soldiers do not know how.
  11. Amitryakin
    Amitryakin 4 August 2017 20: 01
    0
    She flew away ...
  12. Dimid
    Dimid 4 August 2017 21: 28
    +6
    Hmmm ... Even if we assume that a certain drone was actually shot down, how did they understand that it was precisely the “terrorist drone“ Khayyat Tahrir al-Sham ”(Jebhat Al-Nusra), which was used to adjust the fire of militants in Damascus, quarter by quarter with the Russian embassy? Does Jebhat An-Nusra have any special, unique drones that you can’t confuse with anything? In general, the title of the note is too pathetic.
  13. tax payerschik
    tax payerschik 5 August 2017 04: 47
    +2
    You are like children. This is a staged video. Maybe they shot something. But, filmed for show.
  14. Pecheneg
    Pecheneg 5 August 2017 10: 22
    0
    And where is the defeat of the UAV?
  15. sesame
    sesame 6 August 2017 21: 13
    0
    Quote: Dr. Hub
    Maybe I don’t understand what in this life? But isn't it too expensive a treat? From guns on sparrows. Is there anything simpler for a drone?

    Straight tongue removed. There are no other tools to combat drones?
    1. Manul
      Manul 9 August 2017 23: 19
      0
      Quote: sezam
      Quote: Dr. Hub
      Maybe I don’t understand what in this life? But isn't it too expensive a treat? From guns on sparrows. Is there anything simpler for a drone?

      Straight tongue removed. There are no other tools to combat drones?

      Americans from Apache can shoot a mujahideen missile, and the whole world screams how cool they are. Hiroshima nuclear bomb - also no questions. Even I do not understand these cries about the high cost of "Willow." You at least tell me your graduation of drones - from what take-off mass will suit you down.
  16. radiola
    radiola 8 August 2017 18: 10
    0
    Have you bought a free pilot on Ali Express, or "gifted" who?
  17. Serzh_R
    Serzh_R 8 August 2017 20: 37
    0
    Sparrows will be larger if the operator is wetted with a rocket and the drone is planted.
  18. Mitty smu
    Mitty smu 9 August 2017 17: 11
    0
    well, where is the ending