Military Review

China: India plays with fire

37
The representative of the Ministry of Defense of China, Colonel Zhou Bo made a very tough statement addressed to India. According to the Chinese military official, if India does not want war, its soldiers must leave the Doklam Plateau, located at the junction of the borders of India, Bhutan and China. In China, they say that India does not have rights to Doklam, and at the same time refer to the contract from 1890 of the year. In that treaty, Chinese Tibet and Sikkim are now delimited, the latter of which is now part of India. By Tibet geographically and applies plateau Doklam.

In New Delhi, firstly, they did not recognize and do not recognize the contract from 1890 of the year, and, secondly, they believe that China itself violated the agreements reached earlier with neighboring Bhutan (the last of 1998) to start building military infrastructure (first all we are talking about a military road).

China: India plays with fire


The Indian military is in the area of ​​the Doklam Plateau, as the Indian authorities consider the actions of China in this territory to threaten the sovereignty of India. China, in turn, accuses India of encroaching on its own sovereignty and calls for "not playing with fire."
This is the wording used the other day by the head of the press service of the Ministry of People's Republic of China, U Qian. According to him, if the Indian army does not leave the area of ​​Doklam, then China will increase its military grouping in this sector and begin military exercises.

Recall that China and India are members of international organizations such as the SCO and BRICS.
Photos used:
Twitter
37 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. kolkulon
    kolkulon 2 August 2017 07: 43
    +6
    Both sides are well armed and are starting to slowly bullish Druk at each other.
    1. stalkerwalker
      stalkerwalker 2 August 2017 07: 51
      +24
      These contradictory approaches to assessing the situation around the Doklam plateau will be played by the “partners” of the most exclusive nation in the world. To inflate the fire and deliver a fire hose with gasoline, just in the spirit of the capitol hill owners.
      1. bouncyhunter
        bouncyhunter 2 August 2017 08: 07
        +8
        That's right. Not for nothing that mattresses so many Indians "spud" ...
        1. dik-nsk
          dik-nsk 2 August 2017 08: 59
          +3
          IMHO, graters between the Chinese and Indians are beneficial not only for mattresses, but also for us, let them be in tension away from our borders and especially the Far East .. well, but we will favorably "reconcile"))
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 2 August 2017 09: 21
            +13
            Quote: dik-nsk
            IMHO, graters between the Chinese and Indians are beneficial not only to mattresses, but also to us, let them be in tension away from our borders and especially the Far East

            You are very mistaken, we do not need this conflict at all, this conflict is entirely in the interests of the United States with the distant goal of destroying the BRICS.
            And do not moan about the Far East, there is no threat to us from the PRC, but there is from the United States and Japan.
            1. dik-nsk
              dik-nsk 2 August 2017 11: 20
              0
              and I think that it’s you who are seriously mistaken - everyone has their own opinion))) China is our partner, but I would not call him an ally (and who is our ally at all?), so that tying hands to such a giant is beneficial to all other giants, which us that mattresses, geopolitics hi
              1. badens1111
                badens1111 2 August 2017 11: 24
                +6
                Quote: dik-nsk
                so that tying hands to such a giant is beneficial to all other giants that we

                Well, it’s direct profitable, why would it? Maybe it’s profitable for the West? And the USA? More precisely.
                Quote: dik-nsk
                China is our partner, but I would not call him an ally

                That's your business.
                Quote: dik-nsk
                (and who is our ally?),

                And you ask the leaders of the 90s whom they have not betrayed and sold that there are no allies left. It’s quite a job for the US geopolitical rival, all the fuss of politicians of the 90s.
        2. pvv113
          pvv113 2 August 2017 09: 40
          +3
          I would not want these two giants to start a war.
          Hello Pasha!
    2. Pulya
      Pulya 2 August 2017 07: 52
      +1
      China calls for "not playing with fire"

      Full of “friendly” rhetoric wassat
      Not enough yet, a little war, between China and India, for complete happiness am
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 2 August 2017 08: 05
        +9
        Not enough yet, a little war, between China and India, for complete happiness

        And to the joy of the Americans, who are sleeping and see how to weaken China at least a little.
        1. jonhr
          jonhr 2 August 2017 09: 10
          0
          in my opinion about weakening China this refers to another country more
    3. garx
      garx 2 August 2017 08: 18
      +5
      It will be even more fun when the US officially supports India
    4. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 2 August 2017 17: 07
      +1
      Recall that China and India are members of international organizations such as the SCO and BRICS.

      Which hints at the real "value" of membership in these organizations, for the above parties. what
  2. Shadow shooter
    Shadow shooter 2 August 2017 07: 48
    +2
    India is already a half-breed of Americans
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 2 August 2017 09: 39
      +3
      What does it mean already? Anglo-Saxons almost never left India ...
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 2 August 2017 07: 50
    +13
    We thought what China would be "distracted" with while they were "sorting out" with Russia. And at the same time, they are laying a mine under the BRICS and the SCO ... It is not for nothing that the CIA men eat their bread. Bleed two of the largest population, and even nuclear powers, in the struggle for a piece of rock at breakneck heights - what else does the hegemon need?
    1. Pulya
      Pulya 2 August 2017 07: 58
      +5
      Bleed two of the largest population, and even nuclear powers, in the struggle for a piece of rock at breakneck heights - what else does the hegemon need?

      It’s empty to look for a black cat in a dark room, if at the same time there are no cats in this room, laughing
      As Putin is blamed for all the troubles of the West, so you are the United States in return ...
      Funny
      1. osoboye_mneniye
        osoboye_mneniye 2 August 2017 08: 47
        +3
        Quote: Pulya
        Bleed two of the largest population, and even nuclear powers, in the struggle for a piece of rock at breakneck heights - what else does the hegemon need?

        It’s empty to look for a black cat in a dark room, if at the same time there are no cats in this room, laughing
        As Putin is blamed for all the troubles of the West, so you are the United States in return ...
        Funny

        None of the parties will aggravate the conflict, unless someone is the third instigator. The third, as a rule, is one who is interested in promoting their interests in the region. When interests cannot be achieved, instability can be created, and against its background, try to get what you want.
        This is the policy of both the United States and Russia. Some methods are more elegant, while others are rougher. But the essence is one.
        Or do you want to say that Russia does not engage in foreign policy in the Middle East and does not conduct propaganda in order to bring discord among enemies? All are looking for weak points of the enemy and hit them. Do we have all of these Nagorno-Karabakh, Ossetia, Ichkeria, independent Baltic states, etc., on your own, did you think?
        1. badens1111
          badens1111 2 August 2017 09: 12
          +4
          Quote: osoboye_mneniye
          None of the parties will aggravate the conflict, unless someone is the third instigator. The third, as a rule, is one who is interested in promoting their interests in the region.

          Tell the truth, in the conflict between India and China, the United States is first and foremost interested. No one else.
          Quote: osoboye_mneniye
          Or do you want to say that Russia does not engage in foreign policy in the Middle East and does not conduct propaganda in order to bring discord among enemies?

          Do you catch the difference in the style of Russian politics and the "politics" that the West leads, led by its hegemon, the United States?
          Is it really Russia, in the BV region, who created, educated and armed ISIS, or is it the brainchild of the USA?
          Catch the difference?
          The propaganda of total violence and destruction, the massacre of Gentiles, the archaization of the region, is the fruit of US policy.
          The desire to suppress the conflict, at the same time destroying ISIS and its associated movements, in order to maintain peace and order in the region, the policy of the Russian Federation, do you understand the difference?
          Are political and economic goals pursued, of course.
          The goal of the United States is to bend the BV upward so that it would then dictate its will, from the position of the Boss of the world gas station, controlling the water routes and supplies of the UGV. This is obvious, plus the destruction of the BV states with the creation of a permanent source of tension.
          The goal of Russia is different, preserving BV as it is, possibly with a partial change in the position of the Kurds, plus stopping the US claims to dominate the region with projecting the whole world. The difference is significant ..
          Quote: osoboye_mneniye
          Do we have all of these Nagorno-Karabakh, Ossetia, Ichkeria, independent Baltic states, etc., on your own, did you think?

          They arose in 90, as a result of the activities of forces inside the country, with the help of forces outside, with the activation of all kinds of nationalisms and the stopping of the efforts of state structures to eliminate the most rabid destroyers. It’s a paradox, but the fact is that the country passed the highest echelon of power.
          1. osoboye_mneniye
            osoboye_mneniye 4 August 2017 00: 23
            0
            Everyone has one goal - to dominate for their own benefit. But the means are different. Distinguish one from the other. Undoubtedly, Russia proceeds from Slavic values. And America is from Anglo-Saxon. Our values ​​are as wild to them as theirs to us. But we then accepted their faith (capitalism), and they destroyed ours - socialism / communism .. Think about it. It's me that we are slowly surrendering our Slavic values. Reasons for joy are not enough.
            And further. The Americans proceed from the fact that everything that does not contradict the law (or is not proven to contradict) is permissible. They have no morality. Rather, there is - honor the law. The rest is superfluous. When we learn to understand the course of their thoughts and their motives, then we can beat the enemy with his weapons and defeat.
            From our 90s to this day, we can say for sure that the highest echelon of traitors did not take on its own. He was raised by the sixties in Solzhenitsen, Vysotsky (with all due respect to him, this talented man turned out to be only an instrument in the hands of enemies) against the backdrop of powerful propaganda and other subversive activities. Read the libel of the 80s periodicals. You will understand a lot.
            You simplify everything and do not see the connection with the past. And this is a direct way to repeat mistakes.
        2. Pulya
          Pulya 2 August 2017 10: 58
          0
          None of the parties will aggravate the conflict, unless someone is the third instigator

          Do you think that the United States puts pressure on China, so that he, in turn, unleashed a war with India ???
          I understand this situation in relation to the "third" countries, but with China, it’s too far-fetched. wassat
          1. osoboye_mneniye
            osoboye_mneniye 4 August 2017 00: 29
            0
            I believe that introducing discord between India and China (aggravation of the sluggish current problem) by increasing military power and the proper formation of the Government of India, this is completely beyond the power of a third party, and this is exactly what is needed to split the BRICS.
            To whom and why this may be necessary, you can guess for yourself.
  4. bald
    bald 2 August 2017 07: 52
    0
    This is not a good situation. It affects us, too, not only politically. But it would not be bad to measure them, it's worth it, think.
    1. aybolyt678
      aybolyt678 2 August 2017 08: 07
      +1
      Quote: bald
      But it would not be bad to measure them

      make peace?
  5. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 2 August 2017 08: 35
    +2
    A very good hint for fans of "friendship" with China. Which is already conducting a creeping expansion into our lands.
  6. mitrich
    mitrich 2 August 2017 08: 37
    0
    Quote: aybolyt678
    Quote: bald
    But it would not be bad to measure them

    make peace?

    No, the man wrote, measure it! So we will measure! Will roulette go? laughing
  7. KGB_TSRU
    KGB_TSRU 2 August 2017 08: 44
    0
    I am for the Indians.
    1. Grits
      Grits 2 August 2017 09: 51
      +2
      And we are neither for those, nor for others. We are for the fact that China and India do not butt, but slowly restore good neighborly relations.
  8. Topotun
    Topotun 2 August 2017 09: 19
    0
    That's just the machah between India and China was not enough .... Here the Americans will be happy ....
    1. Roma 1977
      Roma 1977 2 August 2017 12: 08
      0
      Russia - solid profit. And not only in the economy. The main thing is to remain neutral.
      1. Evgeniy667b
        Evgeniy667b 2 August 2017 13: 14
        0
        What are you saying? Russia, what a fright you win? And the Indians buried in their ambitions, it is a fact!
        1. Roma 1977
          Roma 1977 3 August 2017 10: 10
          0
          Both will need military materials of Russian origin. But at the same time it will be possible for them to touch everything that interests Russia, and to bargain as it should.
      2. Topotun
        Topotun 2 August 2017 14: 51
        0
        This is unlikely! Both India and China are our trading partners. And their war - we do not need a nafik. Yes, and given their capabilities in terms of personnel (1-2 million does not count), an incident may blaze mom do not worry.
  9. Tolstoevsky
    Tolstoevsky 2 August 2017 09: 32
    0
    touched by the attempts of our Western and Middle Eastern partners to drag India into the war with China
    1. Topotun
      Topotun 2 August 2017 15: 46
      0
      The saddest thing is that they can completely drag in.
  10. swetlana1
    swetlana1 2 August 2017 10: 56
    0
    The Americans found a good point of conflict between the two largest countries in this region
  11. tracer
    tracer 3 August 2017 23: 50
    0
    Now the Americans will get involved there for everyones escalation. This is their erotic dream with a conda pole, China will engage in a war with the Indians. It is possible with Russia (as an option). Also normal.