The media learned about the possible response of Russia to new US sanctions

101
According to the newspaper "Businessman" citing sources in the Foreign Ministry, in response to the new sanctions, Russia may expel 35 American diplomats from the country, as well as seize the real estate of the US Embassy.

According to Kommersant, Moscow's retaliatory measures will also take into account the diplomatic scandal late last year, when the US authorities expelled 35 Russian diplomats from the country and arrested two diplomatic property.

The media learned about the possible response of Russia to new US sanctions


Since the document makes it virtually impossible for Russia to return its diplomatic property in the United States, which was seized during the previous administration, the Russian authorities may seize the dacha complex of the American embassy in Serebryany Bor and their warehouses.
- stated in the material.

Also, Russia can expel 35 American diplomats. In addition, the authorities are discussing "the possibility of limiting the maximum number of employees of the American diplomatic mission in Moscow."

On the eve of the House of Representatives of the US Congress, a majority of votes approved the bill on sanctions against Russia, Iran and the DPRK. In the near future the document will be considered by the Senate, after which it will be sent to the President for signature. If finally approved, the new sanctions package could become the largest since the beginning of 2014. The restrictions are mainly related to energy.

The Kremlin said that it is "extremely negative" about the bill, which undermines Russian-American relations. The Foreign Ministry noted that Washington primarily harms America itself, negatively affecting the country's authority and credibility. The current version of the sanctions was also criticized in the EU, since the document implies restrictions against Russian energy projects in Europe.
101 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    27 July 2017 10: 10
    is this a symmetrical answer? for all the evil that our Western and Middle Eastern partners have done to us?
    1. +10
      27 July 2017 10: 13
      My opinion coincides with yours. What remains - "Poplar" poohhh ??? However, this is a rhetorical question ...
      1. 0
        27 July 2017 12: 26
        Quote: annodomene
        - "Poplar" poohhh ???

        He should go on Pennsylvania Avenue Monday!
        And then all the issues will be resolved ...
        1. +4
          27 July 2017 13: 12
          Yeah, right away and pensions will cease to be beggarly, and everyone will stop stealing, and oil will rise in price. Let's live!
    2. +9
      27 July 2017 10: 22
      somehow liquid ...
      1. +5
        27 July 2017 10: 27
        According to the Kommersant newspaper, citing sources in the Foreign Ministry, in response to new sanctions, Russia may ...
        laughing
        It can, maybe, and maybe, yes Can it? belay For us, the American banner is above our own. How is it that someone other than Stalin would dare to spit on the stars scattered on the mattress?
      2. +3
        27 July 2017 10: 32
        They know that we cannot cover up their mechanical engineering with us. Therefore, it is watery. It is not in our interests to develop the conflict.
        1. +5
          27 July 2017 10: 55
          Quote: BerBer
          They know that we cannot cover up their mechanical engineering with us.

          Foolishly everything is possible ... But why? if it's in our best interest ...
          And then, what are the businessmen who have invested in our industry to blame? They are not against mutually beneficial cooperation. This is all muddied up by the watered crowd, which has set itself the goal of * pacifying * (c) Trump. Yes
          1. +6
            27 July 2017 11: 10
            It's not about production, everything is clear here - it will hurt us more. It is necessary not only to reduce the embassy of the Merikos, but to equate it with our number there, it would look fairer. You can also cash out their bonds, or at least stop buying, etc.
            1. +1
              27 July 2017 11: 37
              Sanctions will not surprise Russia, but the EU was kicked out of the Capitol properly.
              Today, the head of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, plans to discuss US sanctions and possible retaliatory measures against them by the Europeans at a meeting with EU officials. Several options have already been proposed - from blocking the action of new US sanctions on the EU territory to introducing retaliatory measures of economic pressure on the United States - for example, to limit American companies' access to loans from European banks.
              The problem with Europe is that it is fragmented, and it is unlikely that it will be possible to work out a common position quickly. In the sanctions policy, the votes of all EU members are equal - when voting, the decisions of Germany and any Romania are equal. And if at least one EU country votes against, no decision is made. So, if during the next extension of sanctions against the Russian Federation, the same Italy or Hungary changed their traditional decision, the sanctions against Moscow would be lifted.
              In today's case, the question of the US answer may rest on the unwillingness to support the opinion of the majority of American satellites - such as Poland, Lithuania, Latvia or Estonia. The process of their "persuasion" can take a long time. But we see that Germany has already begun to put pressure on Poland and the Baltic states, it remains only to understand how effective these actions are.
      3. +6
        27 July 2017 10: 47
        For some reason, let's wag a finger too. We look (or are, ugh, ugh) absolutely toothless, and an open economic war is being waged against us, and for our own money .... is this probably a "cunning plan" in action?
      4. +7
        27 July 2017 11: 13
        Enough to be almond-shaped! Submit 100 billion US securities to the United States for payment. At once! And don't forget to get rid of the dollars. Prohibit the circulation of the dollar within Russia! And if we take into account that the state and participants have more than a trillion dollars of all dollars, then America cannot avoid a deep recession. And if the dollar falls in price, then the domino effect will play, and the whole world will begin to get rid of the falling dollar.
        1. +1
          27 July 2017 11: 36
          Children's reasoning .. They are correct in essence, but not real in life.
          1. +2
            27 July 2017 11: 57
            it was already boring to read about the possible extreme necessary measures in response, they began to panic a little
          2. +8
            27 July 2017 12: 41
            Quote: Nasr
            Children's reasoning .. They are correct in essence, but not real in life.

            It depends on who is not real. For Putin and his team, yes. And for decisive and business people, patriots of their country - very real, unambiguously possible! Russia has outgrown Putin and wants more than Putin can. Putin has already played his historical role. Crimea was his ceiling. Only other, new people can move the situation further.
            1. 0
              27 July 2017 13: 12
              Let's say - you are exactly that decisive and businesslike ...
              They presented the US for 100 billion ........ And they sent you with your presentation (do you doubt that this gopnik can do this?) .... What will you do?
              Freeze, say for the same Crimea ..... What are your actions?
              It is possible to ban the dollar in Russia, but for what are you going to buy, say, a machine in Germany? or China?
              1. +4
                27 July 2017 14: 50
                Quote: Nasr
                They presented the US for 100 billion ........ And they sent you with your presentation (do you doubt that this gopnik can do this?) .... What will you do?

                So it will be their problem! This is essentially a default. Disclaimer! Who will believe them after that? All by hook or by hook will begin to get rid of American bonds. This is the end of the dollar! Which is what we ultimately need.
                Quote: Walanin
                and where then to put this paper, the dollar will immediately collapse?

                It will collapse sooner or later. No matter how tight the rope twists, but any pyramid always has an end!
                1. 0
                  27 July 2017 15: 33
                  Quote: Stas157

                  So it will be their problem! This is essentially a default. Disclaimer! Who will believe them after that?

                  The whole world knows that the USA is a soap bubble ... but they believe. Moreover, the same USA is "pumping" the whole world with a fabulous debt ... including Russia, which has not the worst macroeconomic indicators, backed up, at the same time, by a nuclear club and not only ...
                2. +1
                  28 July 2017 12: 22
                  Quote: Stas157
                  So it will be their problem! This is essentially a default. Disclaimer!

                  The securities specialist is immediately visible. You need to present papers for payment at a certain time. As long as the Americans complied with it, they did not reach a default, therefore their securities are considered reliable. Unlike RF securities - do you know the difference in yield? Therefore, you will not be able to present anything, an attempt will only cause loud laughter from all the other specialists in the Central Bank.
        2. 0
          27 July 2017 13: 13
          Quote: Stas157
          Submit 100 billion US securities to the United States for payment. At once!

          and where then to put this paper, the dollar will immediately collapse?
      5. The comment was deleted.
      6. +3
        27 July 2017 12: 29
        Quote: maxim947
        somehow liquid ...

        That's right!
        The list should be very long
        And the nauseous McDonald's must be removed!
        1. +3
          27 July 2017 12: 36
          Quote: GRANATE-19

          And the nauseous McDonald's must be removed!

          A million people visit McDonald's every day

          Beef and pork cutlets are made on our order by the Russian company "MARR Russia". Chicken products are supplied to us by Cargill (Tula region) and Miratorg (Russia). French fries for us are made by McCain and Farm Frites. Sandwich buns for the main menu are baked by our long-time partner, the Moscow bakery East Bolt Rus. Pies and cakes for rolls are also made there for us. Cheese is supplied by the Hochland company (Russia), vegetables - by Belaya Dacha. The supplier of milk mixtures for cocktails and ice cream is the Ehrmann company. All three factories are located in Russia. Our coffee supplier is Paulig, and tea is May ... In a word, McDonald's has a lot of partners, and we thank each of them for high-quality and fresh ingredients!

          All these enterprises should be closed, hard workers to hard labor, directors should be hung for contacting agents of the "White House" and the Pentagon !!! wassat
      7. +2
        27 July 2017 15: 46
        yes, we didn't eat well ...
    3. +2
      27 July 2017 15: 45
      Do you not take into account the "concern" of the Foreign Ministry?
    4. 0
      27 July 2017 21: 19
      Quote: Tolstoevsky
      is this a symmetrical answer?

      Quote: avtar
      According to Kommersant, Moscow's retaliatory measures will also take into account the diplomatic scandal late last year, when the US authorities expelled 35 Russian diplomats from the country and arrested two diplomatic property.

      This is a fake handshake media! More precisely, the desire of their foreign owners that "there was".

      Otherwise, if we admit it for a minute, then - if 3,14 Andos suddenly do not accept new sanctions, it turns out - the Russian Federation should accept as it is "robbery in broad daylight" with diplomatic property and expulsion of diplomats. And silently forgive ...
      And in diplomacy there is a "mirroring principle": you have taken away, you have sent - it will be the same. And nothing else!

      As for the retaliatory measures against the "new sanctions" - then let's see what the reaction to "rudeness" will be (c) GDP
      Perhaps from all over the door on the jamb, when all the dishes are "smashed and halved" ...
    5. 0
      28 July 2017 11: 31
      Quote: Tolstoevsky
      is this a symmetrical answer? for all the evil that our Western and Middle Eastern partners have done to us?


      Allah will answer them symmetrically, in the next world. Surely for each partner, a separate frying pan is already warming up.
  2. +2
    27 July 2017 10: 11
    americans: what about us?
  3. +11
    27 July 2017 10: 11
    in response to new sanctions, Russia may expel 35 American diplomats from the country, as well as seize the real estate of the US embassy.

    Is this a response to new sanctions? This should be a response to their behavior in relation to our diplomatic property and ambassadors, and not to new sanctions. Otherwise, we will be trailing in the tail of their sanctions and responding to them in a "stagnant" manner ...
  4. +4
    27 July 2017 10: 13
    that for a long time they respond only with injections of information, without specific cases.
    1. +2
      27 July 2017 11: 03
      Quote: aybolyt678
      that for a long time they respond only with injections of information, without specific cases.
      They are waiting for a go-ahead from the GDP. Everyone hopes for common sense, the reaction of the EU, American business ...
      But, personally, I very much doubt that the new YUBERMENSHY have something else besides their personal benefits ...
  5. +22
    27 July 2017 10: 13
    Send, no, throw out all the diplomats nafig (another word creeps into my head)! Break the deep relationship. Bomb the opposition in Syria. Make some fun (at least ostentatiously) with China.
    In a month silk will become ...
  6. +7
    27 July 2017 10: 15
    It takes a long time to decide. We are too kind.
    1. +2
      27 July 2017 10: 19
      harness the horse ... leisurely wassat
      1. +7
        27 July 2017 10: 26
        What kind of horse is there. You can only hear this whining, we will introduce you symmetric sanctions and the like. You cannot threaten if you know that you cannot painfully answer. Otherwise, it will be omitted to the fullest. It is necessary to say a little, but to do it once, so much so that later they will talk about sanctions in a whisper in the toilet chambers.
      2. +9
        27 July 2017 10: 30
        Quote: soroKING
        harness the horse ... leisurely wassat

        Yeah ... When they harnessed it, it turned out that the horse had died ... lol laughing
    2. +2
      27 July 2017 10: 48
      .... weak ...
    3. +4
      27 July 2017 10: 56
      I completely agree. Our kindness is regarded by adversaries as weakness. hi
  7. +6
    27 July 2017 10: 26
    This is already reminiscent of the "thousand and first Chinese warning". How long can you wait? It seems to me until the fall, when Trump signs the sanctions decree.
    Hmm, but how beautifully Putin said "you must hit first" Ligovka did not teach him anything
    1. +2
      27 July 2017 10: 38
      Waiting .. because there is a undercover conversation with Europe ... Feeling how far Europe will follow the sanctions path. Europeans are not happy with US actions. The Russia + Europe union, of course, will not exist, but the European negative towards the United States (in connection with the latest actions of the United States) can be tried to be used, but for this you need to wait ...
      Russia is preparing a response, they will accept it after Trump signs the papers.

      P.S. In fact, the United States declared war on the Russian people when it finally accepts (and they will) accept the last sanctions ... War for a long time, for exhausting. Fortunately, we have everything for the development of our country
      1. +3
        27 July 2017 11: 00
        Do not flatter yourself, the main thing we have is Dimon and a team that will use not the country's potential, but Ours, in the form that we work longer, receive more taxes from Us, and it is desirable that we do not live up to retirement age hi
        1. +1
          27 July 2017 11: 04
          What do you suggest specifically? Don't pay taxes, don't work? What exactly? Go starving, live in the open? Children are barefoot?
          P.S. What is your car brand?
          1. +1
            27 July 2017 15: 09
            I suggest not to be patient, you are all looking for enemies in the west, as Mr. Kiselev rubs you, but you have to look inside)
            1. +1
              27 July 2017 15: 37
              Quote: spirit
              I suggest not to be patient, you are all looking for enemies in the west, as Mr. Kiselev rubs you, but you have to look inside)

              Demagoguery ... The mere fact that we are all blind (according to your words), and you at that time saw through - speaks for the fact that you breed demagoguery.

              By the way, what channel is Kiselev on now?
    2. +3
      27 July 2017 10: 49
      Yes, there is nothing to beat, by and large ...
      1. +2
        27 July 2017 10: 55
        There is always something to beat. At least not to chat, but to do what they always do in such cases. Expulsion of 35 diplomats, and the arrest of the property of the diplomatic mission.
        If the Kremlin expects an improvement in attitudes, they are more stupid than I even thought.
        1. +1
          27 July 2017 11: 00
          Quote: Bakht

          If the Kremlin expects an improvement in attitudes, they are more stupid than I even thought.

          There will be no improvement, even a blind person can see it ... When the Congress adopts almost unanimously (419 against 3) a document, then obviously there is no place further ... But in the Kremlin they are still blind ... in the opinion of Azerbaijan!
          1. +2
            27 July 2017 11: 49
            The country does not matter. I don’t honor mine too much either. And if we ignore the fact that I am from Azerbaijan, is something wrong?
            1. 0
              27 July 2017 12: 00
              Then "the spirit was not enough", but now it is enough ... did you bribe the "spirit"?  in the first part of their comment, they reasoned sensibly, then the logic disappeared ... 

              sorry, I am writing to the wrong comment. hi
              1. +2
                27 July 2017 12: 33
                So where did I say that "the spirit is enough"? As six months ago, it was not enough and now it is not. The answer is no .... How long will the Kremlin wait? And what exactly? Better relationships? Or that the diplomats will be returned and the diplomatic property will be unblocked?
                The logic remained as it was. The country's leadership is completely comprador. Individuals do not make the difference. Hence the lack of reaction.
                By the way, compradors run the show in Azerbaijan too.
                1. 0
                  27 July 2017 12: 47
                  Quote: Bakht
                  So where did I say that "the spirit is enough"?



                  Quote: Bakht

                  I a priori think that fools and blind people do not reach such heights. If a person has reached the heights of governing the country, then he has some baggage. And quite possibly even more than mine. In the end, none of those who write here have such a volume of information. We are not reported from the General Staff, the Ministry of Finance, or the diplomatic post.


                  Quote: Bakht
                  ..How long will the Kremlin have to wait? And what exactly? Better relationships? Or that the diplomats will be returned and the diplomatic property will be unblocked?


                  You rush about, you seem to understand that you do not have all the infa, but an ardent desire to rush to the embrasure sweeps away the logic ...
                  1. +3
                    27 July 2017 12: 58
                    So what. I wrote everything correctly. We reached the heights, they have information, but the darling is not enough. What is illogical here? And in winter it was not and in summer it is not enough.
                    We would like to answer - they answered. If they don't answer, they hope to come to an agreement.
                    1. 0
                      27 July 2017 13: 43
                      Quote: Bakht
                      We reached the heights, they have information, but the darling is not enough. ...


                      Well, yes, in 2008. darling was enough to write out Saakashvili (along with his patrons from the Pentagon), there is also the example of the Crimea and Donbass - did not bow before the "world community", and now it was not enough to expel diplomats? ...
                  2. +1
                    28 July 2017 12: 32
                    Quote: Nasr
                    but an ardent desire to rush into the embrasure sweeps away logic ...

                    but an ardent desire to throw the Russians into the embrasure sweeps away logic ...
          2. +2
            27 July 2017 11: 53
            Want to know the opinion .... from Azerbaijan?
            I a priori think that fools and blind people do not reach such heights. If a person has reached the heights of governing the country, then he has some baggage. And quite possibly even more than mine. In the end, none of those who write here have such a volume of information. We are not informed from the General Staff, from the Ministry of Finance, or from the diplomatic post. But there are general rules and laws. The expulsion of diplomats had to be answered immediately. Now, six months later, it's not even funny. This is simply called "not enough spirit".
      2. +1
        27 July 2017 10: 57
        Quote: Kent0001
        Yes, there is nothing to beat, by and large ...

        Well, the first handlers appeared ...
  8. +1
    27 July 2017 10: 27
    that they answer for a long time, And there are no concrete cases. They are probably afraid of something
  9. +2
    27 July 2017 10: 30
    I would like to know: do the children of some politicians continue to live and study in NATO countries?
  10. +2
    27 July 2017 10: 33
    Actually, this is just a long-awaited answer for Obama's December freaks. There must be something more serious.
  11. +1
    27 July 2017 10: 34
    It's time to move on to open confrontation with the Americans. They were completely blighted! They will not go to a nuclear conflict, too many assets have been accumulated by the Anglo-Saxons over many centuries to lose all this overnight. In my opinion, even in Russia, up to half of federal property belongs to them (the Anglo-Saxons).
    1. 0
      27 July 2017 10: 50
      Quote: bratchanin3
      In my opinion, even in Russia, up to half of federal property belongs to them (the Anglo-Saxons).


      Yes, all 100%, including you. wassat
    2. +1
      28 July 2017 12: 36
      Quote: bratchanin3
      up to half of federal property belongs to them (the Anglo-Saxons).

      Is the property federal or Anglo-Saxon? How do you think? Who are the papers for?
      1. 0
        29 July 2017 13: 39
        Fu you well you, what questions are not correct. Naturally, the share of the property of the one who paid the money!
        For example, Medvedev announces the privatization of the Russian merchant fleet, and the Abrahams buy 30% of the value of this fleet (in shares). The question is, whose property is this 30%? And what kind of capital is it going abroad every year in the amount of 20-30 billion American rubles?
        1. +1
          30 July 2017 14: 57
          Quote: bratchanin3
          privatization of the Russian merchant fleet

          What, what fleet ?? What are you talking about? The fleet was privatized 24 (twenty four !!) years ago! I will not say how many years the blocks of shares held out in federal ownership, but in my opinion, Russia entered the new millennium with a completely private merchant fleet, without a trace of the state in the constituent documents of shipowners. And from the Charters of the AO-owners of the fleet all sorts of articles about mobilization cases and some obligations to the flag state disappeared. All the more so as the flag is there, and the Russian one was hung on the occasion of a bareboat charter.
          1. 0
            31 July 2017 10: 00
            Well, I’m talking about the same thing! That's right, you say. And the profit earned by this fleet goes over the hill, and not to the treasury of Russia.
            1. 0
              31 July 2017 12: 58
              Quote: bratchanin3
              And the profits made by this fleet

              I'm afraid to be misunderstood, but at least since the middle of the 19th century, shipping has been unprofitable in its pure form. It can exist either with strong support from the flag state or under a flag of convenience. An attempt to distribute the "profit earned by this fleet" usually very quickly leads to the impossibility of paying for the repair of the next vessel per class. Further options are possible (I'm only talking about known cases):
              1.killing of the ship owner;
              2. Burying the captain in the grave (alive);
              3. Welding the vessel to the berth. Well, so as not to run away.
              The rest of the options are softer, but all the same, the ship owner grows sharply over himself, gets smarter, so to speak. Some even stay in business. But not all of them. And they extract the "profit earned by this fleet", saving on repairs, delaying payments to the crew and taking other economically sound measures. I heard that there are some "high-rate cargo". So I understood that these are girls (in bulk, loading in 2 layers), drugs in bags and weapons in boxes. As usual in financial affairs, the higher the profitability, the higher the risks.
              1. 0
                1 August 2017 09: 59
                Why is it not understood, everything is correctly described, this is how it looked (looks) in our "kingdom of crooked mirrors". For some reason, until 1985, the economy was balanced and fishmeal was supplied to hundreds (thousands) of fur farms throughout Siberia and the Far East. And the sea products were obtained not by single vessels (to snatch and put in a pocket), but by whole fleets, i.e. there were tactics and methods of extraction, there was repair and profit. Skillfully, it was possible to destroy a country like the USSR. We bandyuki squeezed a thriving plant of union significance from power, they could not do anything with it, cut up the latest equipment (at that time) and sold it as scrap metal.
                1. 0
                  1 August 2017 12: 06
                  Quote: bratchanin3
                  For some reason, until 1985, the economy was balanced

                  For some reason, until 1987 in a "balanced" economy, there was an expression: "The plan has been made. Now let the name of the president (usually the deputy for economics) form his economy." There is no need now to be surprised at the collapse and plundering of a balanced economy, sharpened to fulfill physical indicators in a collision with the kingdom of the golden calf. Ore KMA (Kursk Magnetic Anomaly) went to Cherepovets in direct rail-water communication through UDP (Ust-Donetsk port). Take a look at the map. The balance of the economy is obvious - everything with tons, ton-kilometers and even with tonnage flights launched within the borders of adjacent shipping companies. I have such examples ... Only since 1987 have they started counting money - where did everything go?
  12. 0
    27 July 2017 10: 46
    It is quite possible that it will be so, only there will be a lot of stench later.
  13. +1
    27 July 2017 10: 55
    How much more snot will we chew? straight masochism ...
    1. +1
      27 July 2017 11: 21
      Not masochism, but coma sutra in different poses ...
  14. +5
    27 July 2017 11: 10
    HA HA HA !!!! What else can our people do? It's a shame, like kittens with a muzzle in their ******, and they meow in response.
    1. +1
      27 July 2017 11: 15
      Quote: private person
      HA HA HA !!!! What else can our people do? It's a shame, like kittens with a muzzle in their ******, and they meow in response.

      That's right, you must immediately send Poplar and Yarsy by parcel post to the United States, so that the Pershing will fly from there, the private person will become tanned. HA HA HA !!!! laughing
      1. +1
        27 July 2017 12: 06
        Yes, no one is talking about poplars and yars, just the answer must be adequate, but in fact there is nothing to oppose.
        1. +1
          27 July 2017 12: 31
          What do you think is adequate? Only a naive person believes that there is nothing to oppose to a country like Russia ...
          1. +2
            27 July 2017 13: 16
            Can you explain what is there? Or so, another puddle ..
            1. +1
              27 July 2017 14: 21
              Quote: Walanin
              Can you explain what is there? Or so, another puddle ..


              There is a country can call you (or your children) into the army and send you to the trenches, say somewhere in the Baltic states - and there you will prove that you are ready to lay down your life and your children, but adequately respond to American sanctions. And it is not necessary to do it in a puddle ... Will this be a worthy response to the sanctions for you?
              P.S. A question the answer.
              1. +2
                27 July 2017 15: 16
                That is, the answer to US sanctions is to unleash a war with the Baltic dwarfs? Smells like a clinic.
                1. +1
                  27 July 2017 15: 43
                  Why with dwarfs, fight with the US army, it is present in the Baltic states - so show your serious anti-sanctions ...
                  And it smells like a clinic when they call to respond harshly and immediately to the sanctions that the President of the United States has not yet signed, and only from that moment do they begin to act. hi

                  1. +2
                    27 July 2017 15: 45
                    That is, you have twice confirmed that the only answer is war.
                    This means that all the real economic possibilities of the answer are missing. I understand correctly?
                    1. 0
                      27 July 2017 15: 58
                      no, not right! Those who are especially zealous are eager to make tough decisions immediately (read the comments - most of the comments are for this) - here they are, first of all, to be corrected - in the trenches! But only! If you take it literally - this is your business.
                      And I just said that there is always something to answer, including economically, but we need to weigh all the pros and cons, otherwise it will turn out like in Ukraine - what they don’t do - everything is to our own detriment! because without thinking, with hot ...
                      1. +2
                        27 July 2017 16: 15
                        So I asked, how can you answer, well, except for the whole world in dust with you?
          2. +2
            27 July 2017 15: 15
            These are the same gallant uraaa shapkozakidateli shouted in front of the 1st world order of the king to the war wassat nothing changes laughing laughing laughing
            1. +1
              27 July 2017 15: 47
              Quote: spirit
              These are the same gallant uraaa shapkozakidateli shouted in front of the 1st world order of the king to the war wassat nothing changes laughing laughing laughing


              You probably didn't read my comments - otherwise you wouldn't write nonsense - look ridiculous with this comment! wassat
  15. +2
    27 July 2017 11: 21
    I quote: "The Foreign Ministry noted that Washington hurts first of all America itself, negatively affecting the country's authority and confidence in it." An idiotic statement, America has the trust of our Foreign Ministry, but it needs a fifth leg like a dog. Another zigzag to go back with his heels, they say, we will not do anything to America in response, because America has already punished itself with a loss of trust !?
    1. 0
      27 July 2017 11: 29
      Sanctions will not surprise Russia, but the EU was kicked out of the Capitol properly.

      Today, the head of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, plans to discuss US sanctions and possible retaliatory measures against them by the Europeans at a meeting with EU officials. Several options have already been proposed - from blocking the action of new US sanctions on the EU territory to introducing retaliatory measures of economic pressure on the United States - for example, to limit American companies' access to loans from European banks.

      The problem with Europe is that it is fragmented, and it is unlikely that it will be possible to work out a common position quickly. In the sanctions policy, the votes of all EU members are equal - when voting, the decisions of Germany and any Romania are equal. And if at least one EU country votes against, no decision is made. So, if during the next extension of sanctions against the Russian Federation, the same Italy or Hungary changed their traditional decision, the sanctions against Moscow would be lifted.

      In today's case, the question of the US answer may rest on the unwillingness to support the opinion of the majority of American satellites - such as Poland, Lithuania, Latvia or Estonia. The process of their "persuasion" can take a long time. But we see that Germany has already begun to put pressure on Poland and the Baltic states, it remains only to understand how effective these actions are.
      1. +2
        27 July 2017 12: 13
        Do you yourself believe in what you wrote? As Uncle Sam says so it will be and these, as you put it, the satellites will not dare to vyaknut words. Look above, the Germans have frozen 5 projects on Nord Stream-2, what would it be? Roofing felts will still be the EU and transit through Hohland suits they steal the same Russian gas.
        1. 0
          27 July 2017 12: 25
          Believe it or not, it doesn't matter ... Today in Brussels they will discuss the sanctions response to Washington. The very fact that the EU is trying to kick it suggests that the US has gone too far in its insolence ..

          And on the freezing of 5 projects - "They should be accepted into the network development plan only when there are permits for the expansion of Nord Stream 2",
          In fact, we are talking about small changes to the German infrastructure, which will not be required now, but when Nord Stream 2 and its main branches are already built in order to activate the infrastructure.

          ... Here, rather, some kind of internal German affairs. At the political level, Germany supports the construction and implementation of Nord Stream 2, but this does not mean that it will prescribe this in all its internal guidelines. Systematic work is in progress. Although, of course, it cannot be ruled out that German officials decided to play it safe a little so as not to create additional pressure on themselves and criticism right now.
      2. +2
        27 July 2017 15: 19
        Yes? And how many times has Europe been friends with us against the United States?
        1. +1
          27 July 2017 15: 49
          Quote: spirit
          Yes? And how many times has Europe been friends with us against the United States?

          For the smartest - I will explain - Making friends and playing on contradictions are two different things! And in the polytechnic they only do what they play on contradictions

          P.S. it becomes obvious that you are not reading my comments, but trying to look smart! Best wishes! hi
  16. +3
    27 July 2017 11: 37
    Quote: maxim947
    somehow liquid ...

    I think it is worth waiting for an official statement on the response to US sanctions. After that, you can safely discuss "watery" or not.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +2
    27 July 2017 12: 39
    In general, these sanctions are very dangerous for us, many simply do not realize. There it is not only about the EU, but the EU will not oppose the US, but in all countries that start or have cooperation with gas workers, even China will break off gas relations with us, as its companies will also fall under US sanctions ... And the PRC does not need this, for them the United States is more important in the economy!
    1. +2
      27 July 2017 13: 17
      but what about Don't tell my Iskander?
  19. +2
    27 July 2017 13: 11
    What month they are already threatening to answer, everyone cannot get their courage together. It would be better to be silent than to dishonor in front of the people, the majority wants a similar answer.
    1. +2
      27 July 2017 13: 43
      Quote: sauvage
      What month they are already threatening to answer, everyone can not get together

      obviously afraid
  20. +1
    27 July 2017 14: 56
    However thin .....
  21. +1
    27 July 2017 15: 22
    expel all diplomats from the country in 24 hours, arrest all property and severely restrict the movement of embassy employees. all who do not have time to leave the country in 24 hours Arrest and try as spies.
  22. +1
    27 July 2017 15: 22
    already half a year: blah ... blah ... blah ...
    And there were no actions and no.
    Talkers are useless in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. only gobble up the budget.
  23. 0
    27 July 2017 15: 26
    Paradoxically, Russia lacks high-level managers. This is especially noticeable in the state. service. There are an abundance of managers, office plankton are heaped up, but there are no competent, initiative managers. Where a high-quality specialist is the head of a region, there is success. There is a victory.
  24. +1
    27 July 2017 15: 50
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Ministry of Exceptional Drystuns.
  25. 0
    27 July 2017 17: 00
    We were late. I wrote about this at the end of last year: you will wait, you will lose!
  26. 0
    27 July 2017 18: 14
    A good asymmetrical answer would be the deportation of 35 of our largest oligarchs with their families to the United States,
    and in addition to them liberals from the government and officials. They will not be able to take their factories and oil rigs with them, and the stolen money has already been in foreign banks for a long time.
    And we will "help" the Americans and the prospect of development will appear.
  27. +2
    28 July 2017 09: 56
    There are hundreds of opportunities to annoy the United States, but each of them will be deployed against us in the same way. Therefore, ours are waiting so as not to step on their own tail.

    In general, I am for the isolation of our country from everything .... but whether my opinion is correct, I do not know.
    It will be better for us in isolation .... we can start moving! And so we always count: "Or maybe it will give you a ride?"