Russia plans to discuss the issue of lifting sanctions on Iran

65
Russia plans to discuss the issue of lifting sanctions on IranAs reported yesterday by RIA "News"Moscow expressed its readiness to discuss the possibility of lifting unilateral sanctions against Iran - provided that the Iranian side puts the nuclear program under full IAEA control. This discussion will be held in upcoming negotiations with the six mediating countries. This was announced yesterday by Deputy Head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation S. Ryabkov.

The deputy minister reminded that in the election article “Russia and the changing world”, Vladimir Putin said that the world community could recognize Iran’s right to work on uranium enrichment - when setting up Tehran’s nuclear program under IAEA safeguards.

Ryabkov said that there is a compromise that could allow the parties to agree. However, Ryabkov noted, another component is also important: when forming this kind of agreement, the international community can cancel the sanctions, including one-sided ones.

The deputy minister noted that such an idea is “absolutely productive”. Moscow will study the approaches to this idea of ​​partners in the framework of the intermediary "six". Russia is now interested in having Iran and the countries of the six reach an agreement on the timing of negotiations as soon as possible.

The United States and other Western countries still suspect Iran of carrying out the latest nuclear weaponscovered by the program of the peaceful atom. Tehran has consistently rejected these allegations, responding to opponents that Iran’s nuclear program is aimed exclusively at peaceful purposes (electricity generation).

A number of organizations and countries regarding Iran have adopted resolutions that require ensuring full transparency of the nuclear program and evidence of its exclusively peaceful nature. In mid-February, the US expanded the list of sanctions against Iran and introduced additional measures against the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence and Security. Now 4 sanctions resolutions of the UN Security Council are acting against Iran.

On February 10, a delegation of IAEA inspectors visited the capital of Iran. The purpose of the visit was to participate in the negotiations on the nuclear program. The trip was the second expert visit to Tehran lately.

After this visit, the IAEA stated that delegates requested access to the Parchin facility, but the Iranian government did not give them permission.

According to the information of the Iranian agency “ISNA”, Ali Asghar Soltaniye, a representative of the Islamic Republic at the IAEA, said that the IAEA inspectors themselves refused to visit the Parchin complex.
65 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +28
    7 March 2012 17: 11
    It’s time for Russia to determine its opponents and partners. A policy of double standards cannot be developed. The situation in the Middle East region showed who Russia is friend and who is not. Moreover, the whole progressive world expects precisely these right steps from Russia.
    1. +2
      7 March 2012 17: 28
      Quote: ioann1
      the whole progressive world is waiting

      Please explain.
    2. +4
      7 March 2012 17: 47
      Quote: ioann1
      It’s time for Russia to determine its opponents and partners.

      A beautifully written phrase that does not oblige you to anything ... hasn’t Russia decided on it, and what do you mean by the progressive world?
      1. 0
        7 March 2012 23: 03
        Ideally, there is still no progressive world. However, Russia as a powerful state, by definition, must seek and have allies to achieve it in its understanding.
    3. mengeleff
      +19
      7 March 2012 18: 31
      Quote: ioann1
      Moreover, the whole progressive world expects precisely these right steps from Russia.

      Iran has a peaceful nuclear program, the lifting of sanctions is a normal reaction of a normal country and of an adequate World.
      Russia and all UN countries should not become hostages of the paranoid from Israel, pushing all of humanity into the madness of the third world war.
      1. -3
        7 March 2012 19: 18
        Nuclear weapons to Iran under no circumstances whatsoever. Therefore, if you support Iran, you should exercise constant, unconditional control. Which, as everyone understands, not everyone likes.
        1. Nymp
          +4
          7 March 2012 20: 19
          "The deputy minister recalled that in the election article" Russia and the Changing World "Vladimir Putin said that the world community could recognize Iran's right to carry out work on uranium enrichment - if Tehran's nuclear program is placed under IAEA guarantees." A very competent and sober view in which the conflict situation itself is resolved, but the Americans are not interested in resolving the conflict! They need a conflict to control the oil territory! And therefore no one will listen to the sound statements of Russia. Especially in this (as mengeleff correctly noted) Israel is vitally interested!
        2. +6
          7 March 2012 21: 13
          “Under no circumstances can Iran use nuclear weapons.” - why is it impossible for Iran to use nuclear weapons? I just wrote a little higher about the "PARANOIK" already possessing this nuclear weapon! It turns out that they can be Jews, but others can not ?! But after all, many already understand that all evil in this world comes precisely from this "God's chosen" nation! That's right, it's high time for Russia to decide who is a friend and who is an enemy, but what are these conditions "under the full control of the IAEA"? Let it then be controlled by the IAEA and Russia, so what? We are all "idiots" by Yusov's concepts! I think that the Putin authorities will not do anything, there will be only talks, nothing more. I would like to believe in the best, but I still cannot share the "optimistic" tone of many comments, alas ...
        3. Marat
          +2
          9 March 2012 05: 18
          Yao Iran is a myth of aggressors
          secondly, even if it would be - it's okay
          the scary thing is that aggressive unpredictable countries already have nuclear weapons - arsonists at our borders - hostile to us and attacking our neighbors and allies
      2. +2
        7 March 2012 21: 03
        they should not become hostages to paranoids from Israel, - by the way, I want to say that these paranoids have nuclear weapons and nothing, no one applies any sanctions to them! No one is sounding the alarm that this paranoid already has nuclear weapons! The question is why?
      3. +2
        7 March 2012 23: 21
        "Iran has a peaceful nuclear program" - I do not agree! She is obviously military!
        "Russia and all UN countries should not become hostages of paranoid Israelis who are pushing all of humanity into the madness of World War III." The fact that the United States is governed today from Israel is not known only to the voters of the United States - for national security purposes laughing ! In this connection, it is humanly pity for ordinary Americans, who are addicted to "their" propaganda.
        1. +1
          8 March 2012 08: 40
          GSH-18
          I completely agree with this author! The United States has long become Israel's "unsinkable" aircraft carrier, but judging by the comments, this is little known here?
          Most of them scold the United States and are silent about Israel! This is not at all funny, we laugh at the "stupidity" of the Americans, but they are trying to do the same with us now! The Soviet education system is breaking down and a "new" task is being introduced to educate idiots!
          Yes, I do not like America, I even have this verse:
          And I'll tell you just like that
          I am a friend - who is the enemy today!
          And all America's friends are
          Enemies, of course, for me!
          By the way, I invite everyone to my page .stihi.ru / avtor / alexdol, but I perfectly understand who made it like that! They were the first to conduct this EXPERIMENT! Now the turn has reached us ... It is appropriate to recall Franklin's statement (1706-1790) about the Jews:
          “Wherever it is, in a country where Jews settle, regardless of their number, they lower its morality, commercial honesty, isolate themselves and do not lend themselves to assimilation. If we, through the Constitution, do not exclude them from the United States, then in less than two hundred years they will rush in large numbers, take over, SWALLOW the country and CHANGE the form of our government. Unless you rule them out, in less than two hundred years our descendants will be working in the fields, keeping them, while they will rub their hands in their I warn you gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, YOUR children will curse you in your graves. "
          Well, what is not a prophecy! And that is exactly what happened!
      4. Marat
        +1
        9 March 2012 05: 16
        in fact, it’s already clear who is behind whom — but it’s too early for Russia to challenge Stump to the camp and Israel openly recognizing Iran and Syria as satellites
        Russia needs to finally reunite with us and Belarusians — even better with Ukraine. The revived Union will be able to openly recognize its satellite allies and resist opponents (and also begin to grow at the expense of other CIS republics)
        In addition to Iran and Syria, there is Cuba with Vietnam, Mongolia, the entire ALBA and Argentina, and others
    4. io_stalin
      +2
      7 March 2012 20: 30
      Quote: ioann1
      It’s time for Russia to determine its opponents and partners

      +2 smile
      The seat on two staggering chairs is a fascinating occupation.
      But it's time to make a choice!
      (at least in the subconscious)
      Iran is a normal country, no worse than others!
      Photos suggest:
    5. 0
      7 March 2012 22: 56
      Sorry, probably off topic, but according to horseradish statistics 80% use horseradish firefox mazil! and we don’t need to spill here a new Amerikosovsky (possibly with spy functions) superhrenochrome browser!
  2. Sarus
    +13
    7 March 2012 17: 13
    I agree..
    The more strong steps the RF takes, the more it will achieve in the future.
    1. +3
      7 March 2012 17: 49
      For Russia, strong steps are simple steps to prevent war in the region ... I don’t understand what general phrases mean about strong steps and future achievements?
      1. +2
        7 March 2012 20: 03
        domokl,
        I support, for us, the most important thing is peace in the region and near our borders. If you look a little further, it is possible to say with a high degree of probability that over the past 150 years Iran, if it was not our friend, at least was not and the enemy. We are interested in a strong, independent Iran, which is able to restrain the appetites of Islamic sattelites in the Middle East and prevent the development of the conflict in the Caucasus. And, by and large, we would not give a damn about the presence of (possible) Iran’s nuclear weapons not our international obligations.
        1. +2
          7 March 2012 22: 02
          old rocket man
          Everything seems to be correct, but is there a big question about "our international obligations"? Why were they adopted? That the Russian authorities do not understand who is behind this international community? Or maybe she considers herself a part of this m. community? Only the interests of RUSSIA should dominate, and not the interests of some "international" rabble! Under the cover of this MS, they have already successfully surrendered Iraq, Yugoslavia, Libya ... Yes, and this MS divided us as it wanted, into a bunch of "independent" states and in the future dreams of ruining RUSSIA according to the same scenario! Maybe enough to please them? I am not a supporter of Putin and not without reason! I wanted to give a link to interesting information about him, but they already managed to DELETE it! Draw your own conclusions! Hopefully the Gaddafi story will serve as a lesson for Putin
  3. TULSKIY CAMOBAP
    +7
    7 March 2012 17: 24
    It’s right and the first thing to export the S-300 which they are so lacking, otherwise we won’t be too late (
    1. signalman
      +7
      7 March 2012 17: 39
      Quote: TULSKIY CAMOBAP

      It’s right and the first thing to export the S-300 which they are so lacking, otherwise we won’t be too late (

      There will be little sense with the S - 300. Here you need all system Air defense in the complex to change, including RTV and electronic warfare, etc. Only modernization of the entire system will make it guaranteed to be stable. Moreover, the Iranians have already made some conclusions after the "Desert Storm": with the help of the Chinese, replace all control cables with fiber optic. So it will be almost impossible to open them now.
      1. +1
        7 March 2012 19: 21
        Change all the control cables with the help of the Chinese to fiber optics. So now it will be almost impossible to open them.



        They do not need to be opened, it is necessary to "turn the satellite away from Iran" and Iran will wave each other aside if they have not forgotten how
    2. +2
      7 March 2012 17: 52
      I don’t understand why we should supply something there? You forgot that we are partners, our legs are not allies ... We do not have an alliance treaty with either Syria or Iran ... We stopped the war, but did not become a regional mordial .. .
    3. wk
      +6
      7 March 2012 18: 05
      Quote: TULSKIY CAMOBAP
      It’s right and the first thing to export the S-300 which they are so lacking, otherwise we won’t be too late (

      s - 300 Russia can supply quite officially even if the sanctions are maintained .... the refusal to supply was due to Medvedev's "personal" decision, which he pushed with Libya ... I think that the GDP, having received a new mandate, will be able to start correcting the "sins" before assuming office .... and it's time for a LADY to "merge" he and in the post of Prime Minister will nonsense ... it's not for nothing that all liberal publications and politicians are so sorry about him.
      1. +3
        7 March 2012 18: 31
        Yes, DAM with Libya something went wrong. Unforgivable step. It’s not good for a chapter to do so. Type of consultants not? Something this question is incomprehensible.
        1. wk
          +3
          7 March 2012 18: 54
          Quote: Yazov
          Yes, DAM with Libya something went wrong.

          he didn’t give up, but took the side of his advisers like Dvorkovich very consciously .... we just have to find out the truth (of course, maybe not, as often happens) about the security council that made this decision, where the GDP and his team were against but there weren’t enough votes .... after that, the GDP and the Ladies entered into an almost open confrontation of statements .... ended with the famous fishing on a boat and the congress with the announcement of the GDP as a candidate, but it didn’t end at all, so according to many sources all the sugar-marsh rallies organized by separate Gazprom structures, where the DAM’s position is still strong .... the struggle continues, now Medvedev is trying to pass through the new EP faction in the State Duma in which the number of DAM supporters has increased a package of laws that can significantly destabilize both the general political and territorial national situation in Russia - elections of lips. , majoritarian districts, simplified registration of parties and presidential candidates, etc. .... So that the struggle continues
          Churchill was truly right, who said that the political struggle in Russia was like a fight of bulldogs under the carpet.
        2. 0
          7 March 2012 20: 08
          Quote: Yes, I gave something to Libya ....
          Not so simple! Most likely, Gaddafi was sacrificed: 1. Gaddafi (for all his positive qualities) was too self-confident and not a reliable ally, 2. Showed the whole world the real "face" of the West, 3. They made it clear to self-confident "kings" that flirting with the SHIT WEST does not save from Western aggression. But at the same time (at that time, the future president of Russia), the GDP spoke out quite harshly about the aggression of the West ...
        3. +2
          7 March 2012 20: 13
          Yes, DAM with Libya something went wrong.
          Not so simple! Most likely, Gaddafi was sacrificed: 1. Gaddafi (for all his positive qualities) was too self-confident and not a reliable ally, 2. Showed the whole world the real "face" of the West, 3. They made it clear to self-confident "kings" that flirting with the SHIT WEST does not save from Western aggression. But at the same time (at that time, the future president of Russia), the GDP spoke out quite harshly about the aggression of the West ...
      2. stasyan
        0
        7 March 2012 18: 54
        then better Surkov to the post of chairman
        1. wk
          +1
          7 March 2012 19: 13
          Quote: Stasyan
          then better Surkov to the post of chairman

          Well, Surkov is an ideologist, and the government must be run by an economic manager - an economist - an administrator ... but I'm not talking about that, for sure there are "gentlemen's agreements" in this undercover struggle - otherwise, a series of bloody upheavals according to African and South American scenarios. Of course, if the LADY remains on the post of the PP for all six years, he will systematically sabotage his work, because he has not ruled out his participation in the future presidential elections .... we'll wait and see!
          1. +1
            7 March 2012 21: 20
            Quote: wk
            well Surkov ideologist

            Surkov demagogue and a fool, the failure of the EP in the elections, including his merit, Putin floats out due to personal charisma and actions, and EP had to be skillfully kept afloat because it is a controversial entity. As a result, everything was left to chance, the election campaign is awkward, that’s Surkov’s case
        2. 0
          7 March 2012 20: 08
          See you soon
      3. 0
        7 March 2012 19: 27
        Medvedev is a good counterweight to Putin. That Libya was leaked, of course, is not beautiful to say the least, apparently so it was necessary. After all, he dragged on time until the bombing began, and then subscribed to the sanctions.
  4. in4ser
    -6
    7 March 2012 17: 25
    Double standards are unfortunately inevitable today, so you need to be able to competently find compromises and negotiate, to AGREE, and not to burn bridges, for example, with Georgia, Moldova - you would agree correctly, now we would have a pro-Russian president sitting there and there. would calmly reach the heights !!!
    1. +3
      7 March 2012 17: 54
      Quote: in4ser
      they would have agreed correctly, now a pro-Russian president would have been sitting there and there, and it would have been possible to calmly reach the heights !!!
      If I agree with the first part of the comment, then the second, which is very doubtful .... The decision on the president is the decision of the people ... Russia simply could help economically ...
      1. in4ser
        +2
        7 March 2012 18: 00
        this is all an illusion that is built by the hands of the elites !!!
        It is not the people who choose, but the elite! And after the people need to please in order to avoid unrest - Georgia is an example.
        Large-scale categories need to be thought.
        Medvedev, too, the people of your choice? :)
        Oh well !!!
    2. +7
      7 March 2012 18: 45
      There, there and there ....... And self-esteem? What is now to cross over in front of everyone and to believe and pray for democracy?
      In Georgia it is in Moldova! So what? Let's get up with cancer ...... Are you in4ser driving this one?
      This is like a schoolboy in the yard, no one would touch the lick. We will agree with that, with this ......
      Forgive Georgia of our dead peacekeepers, and let Moldova take the PMR! So?
      A lot of inferior. Enough !!!
      Maybe now Russia can’t fight even on an equal footing with NATO, but it’s already enough to put in the balls.
      1. in4ser
        +1
        7 March 2012 20: 12
        What fanaticism is that? Well, let's throw off the atomic Georgia :))) - revenge
        The governing power and the people should never be confused - these are two different things.
        Parties have always been able to negotiate, but our Kremlin comrades know how to do it badly (roughly).
        Why was Georgia released?
        why didn’t they finish Mishiko in 08?
        What dark forces prevented this?
        It is right to cooperate with everyone, because there is nothing to beat the show off with a bare booty.
        Someone has not yet grown up to Stalin to influence words on other powers.
        1. Nymp
          +3
          7 March 2012 20: 30
          Quote: in4ser
          The governing power and the people should never be confused - these are two different things.
          But didn’t the Georgian people choose Saakashvili by a majority vote in the last election ?! And this is after the Georgian aggression!
      2. Nymp
        +4
        7 March 2012 20: 27
        Quote: Yazov
        Maybe now Russia can’t fight even on a par with NATO,
        I think NATO buddy will be afraid of a direct conflict with Russia! But indirectly to participate, (to knock down the same Georgians or Moldavians, but throw them weapons) is their jackal business!
    3. +2
      7 March 2012 19: 39
      Imagine that it is on the head of your wife and children pouring "hail", and someone offers to "competently find compromises and negotiate" with the one who gave the order to do this. Your reaction? In Moldova, under the slogan "suitcase-station-Russia", the entire graduating class is shot (girls are raped beforehand), and this should be negotiated with them?
      1. in4ser
        0
        7 March 2012 20: 21
        Speaking of the reasons, it is not necessary to interfere with the consequences of the causes in one barrel !!!
        The reasons need to be properly resolved, and not as it is now fashionable, provoke, and then crush the aggressor. no need to take an example from USA. Russia knows how to fight better than anyone on this planet and this brand must be kept. and do not forget about diplomatic relations.
        1. Nymp
          +4
          7 March 2012 20: 52
          Quote: in4ser
          Russia knows how to fight better than anyone on this planet and this brand must be kept. and do not forget about diplomatic relations.
          That's right! I am joining! Yes
  5. +7
    7 March 2012 17: 25
    We must begin to slowly take the initiative into our own hands.
    1. 755962
      0
      7 March 2012 23: 30
      That's right, and not slowly, but "already yesterday" as they say.
  6. lars
    +3
    7 March 2012 17: 26
    Quote: ioann1
    the whole progressive world is waiting

    is this hto? request
    cool little animal this progressive world, therefore, plus the author wink
  7. +7
    7 March 2012 17: 48
    Any bad world is better than war. Any warrior knows that. War, with all its inhumanity and meaninglessness, comes when diplomats are unprofessional. As long as Russia can restrain the states through diplomatic methods, the world (including Iran) can calmly raise its children. Any wrong move will throw the planet into the crucible of the third world. May God grant our Foreign Ministry reason and skill so that the turn of the Ministry of Defense of Russia does not come to settle the situation. Iran must heed the proposals of Russia. We all (meaning the Russian Federation and Iran) will only benefit from this. The sanctions will be lifted, we will have time to arm Iran as it should, and there the conversation will go differently.
    1. +1
      7 March 2012 22: 36
      Victor. Any thin world is better than war.
      On the one hand, it seems to be true, but on the other .... Now in our former USSR what? Peace or war? Take, for example, Ukraine. There seems to be no military action, but the losses are such that during the years of the Second World War this was not! And losses in people, and losses in the industrial sphere! Most factories are worth it. No work, etc.
      For example, there is an aircraft factory in Kharkov. But he "nezalezhny" is not needed, they are slowly knocking him down, they want to grab him! Maybe such factories in Ukraine are dark darkness? Again, no! Only the Antonov Design Bureau remains in Kiev. Many factories of the defense industry have already collapsed and continue to fall under all sorts of "peaceful" talks! I’m looking at everything and thinking, well, when will people finally understand that we can’t fix anything by any "elections"! The outspoken enemies of the state and the people are now in power, but they tell me "a bad world is better"! With such a "peace" we will all be destroyed very peacefully!
      1. 0
        8 March 2012 11: 28
        alexdol Russia, this stage has almost passed. For us, the losses in industrial production over the period of the nineties exceeded the losses of the USSR in World War II by three times. But now Russia is recovering. The question is who leads the country, and for Ukraine also with whom the country goes hand in hand. As long as the authorities and people in Ukraine do not realize the unity of the three Slavic peoples and choose their path in the Great Slavic troika, there is nothing special to hope for. I can only sympathize.
        1. 0
          8 March 2012 22: 29
          Victor RU Russia this stage has almost passed
          Has it passed? You are writing about enormous losses, but we did not have any war! And the losses are as if "mom" has passed! Oh yes, we had "perestroika", it all started with it. And then it went, went ... The defense industry has been destroyed, the people are dying out, in poverty. It was disgusting to hear how when Putin visited defense factories he was "boasted" that just look, we managed to keep this and that !? What do you mean managed to save? And what about the state, it has nothing to do with it? After all, it was this power that brought it to such a state! But we saw a crowd of Jewish "oligarchs"! Now, if from the very beginning of his reign, Putin would have called all of them to ANSWER, and returned the stolen money to the treasury. And then all sorts of Abramovich, Berezovsky, etc. they build yachts like aircraft carriers and boast about it on the internet, but Russia has no money for military equipment! Science is in the pen, everything that is still being created is just according to old Soviet developments, and what next? Show new samples of technology. How many are there? Units! Putin has a good gun at his very stigma, I wrote above for a reason, about the lesson with Gaddafi for Putin. Gaddafi also did not immediately become objectionable to the West, and so with Putin! Become objectionable with him dealt with as Gaddafi. Perhaps he realized this and thought about reviving the former might of Russia? So that it’s not too late. And on the issue of Ukraine, the Kremlin's position is also not clear. They abandoned the entire Russian-speaking population to the mercy of fate, just gave up Crimea. But in Crimea, not everything is so simple. The decision to transfer it to Ukraine was made by Khrushchev, but there was no approval from the Supreme Soviet of the USSR! So you can cancel all this! And in general, it is high time to put Ukraine in its place. For the fact that she endlessly shows her ass to Russia, I would also apply sanctions to her, despite the fact that I live here myself! But none of this is, apparently the thieves understand each other. So we all need to sympathize, because we also seem to see and understand everything, but we can’t do anything.
  8. +3
    7 March 2012 18: 05
    Iran is a friendly regime for now, but only for now! When all sanctions are lifted, there will be relative calm in the region (which Israel is unlikely to put up with) no one knows how Iran will behave. .And did not have to slow it down.
    1. +4
      7 March 2012 18: 49
      serg000! I agree. Everything in life happens. Maybe then we will have to put Iran in its place. In the meantime, you need help. Politics is such a thing.
      1. Marat
        +2
        9 March 2012 05: 26
        Iran will become an enemy only if the rebuffs are able to carry out the Orange Revolution and put propi nd osovski regime

        The current Iran will always confront the Saudis and the Turks and Turks and will always try to get closer to the CST and Russia
  9. +5
    7 March 2012 18: 12
    It is possible that anti-Russian actions in Iran are not uncommon ...
    1. Nymp
      +4
      7 March 2012 20: 35
      Quote: Tersky
      anti-Russian performances in Iran are not uncommon ...
      Yes, I served on the Iran-Azerbaijan border, you are right not uncommon! But then America supplied them with weapons in the war with Iraq, which the USSR supplied with weapons. Now the situation has turned around! But we must be able to control it; the Union had this experience.
      1. neodymium
        +3
        7 March 2012 21: 07
        Hello to the border guards. Nakhchivan?
        1. Nymp
          +3
          7 March 2012 21: 50
          Quote: neodim
          Hello to the border guards. Nakhchivan?
          No brother, PRISHIB. 13 pz "Cabota" drinks
  10. +4
    7 March 2012 18: 14
    That's right ... a good present for American women and a large part of men for March 8 ....
  11. +4
    7 March 2012 18: 28
    give dildo to Hilary Clinton in the form of c-300 with the inscription * for Iran *
    1. KAV
      KAV
      +2
      7 March 2012 20: 03
      I forgot I probably should send it to McCain and McFaul laughing
  12. io_stalin
    +5
    7 March 2012 18: 37
    The deputy minister noted that such an idea is "absolutely productive."

    Bravo is a wonderful move.
    Now let them get out, the IAEA will get a permit, there will be no basis for the experiences of the USA and ISRAEL.
    We strengthen our natural ally. We remove sanctions and cooperate to the fullest.
    Iran in the EurAsEC !!!
    They are Shiites, like us, in the minority in this kingdom of lies.
  13. +9
    7 March 2012 18: 37
    Well, it's time to dictate and impose conditions favorable to us. Russia rose from its knees, be afraid of adversaries !!!!
  14. +4
    7 March 2012 19: 26
    But it is obvious to stop M daldts. Until they managed to capture the fountain completely. As an option, for 15 days, and repeat everything once in about two weeks with the options. Plus or minus a day. And then, on a new jail time. And then, at least they will do it for themselves. Throw on diapers?

    Can we handle it? - We can handle it. am

    Mlyn, our country has been buried for a millennium. Somehow it doesn’t work out. And the officers are the most stupid, the soldiers are the most rams ... The missiles are the most undemocratic But - Somehow the weapon is very sick. Paradox. However.
  15. +1
    7 March 2012 20: 14
    I understand this is a slapstick for the State Department and others like them ... by the way, here is more
    http://digitalmetro.us/2012/03/07/путин-перехватил-инициативу-госдеп-в/
    1. +1
      10 March 2012 20: 06
      Russia rose from its knees. Now shoulders straighten and krants adversaries
  16. Nymp
    +3
    7 March 2012 20: 38
    I support the position of Russia on the issue with Iran. She lights up like an X-ray: -Who wants peace in this region, and who needs control over oil!
    1. +2
      7 March 2012 21: 27
      Nymp,
      I can’t but agree with this. I support!
      It is necessary to act adequately in the current situation.
  17. +1
    7 March 2012 21: 27
    They wanted to sneeze at the IAEA, they have their own mate, Hussein began to break their rockets, don’t you remember? Still democratized
  18. FiremanRS
    +1
    7 March 2012 21: 48
    They spoke about the prohibitions on Iran to have its own nuclear weapons. I will join the question - on what basis? Why can't they do this? Why not vice versa help them with this, since they want it? And you see, it’s still not tea to make vigorous bonba ... They will confuse a thread and there will be badabum .. And they will make a toy for themselves, which is easier to control. What good if they quietly collect it in the basement? Then I think, and we won’t have any problems!
  19. 0
    7 March 2012 22: 22
    A very correct tactical move. Many "Western democratic" politicians must have found themselves in a messy situation.
  20. Oleg0705
    +1
    7 March 2012 22: 37
    Aleksandr Rar, director of the German Center for Foreign Policy said: “The West is generally wrong about Russia. They believe that Russia has no right to present its view of the New World Order, like this is a kid in the game between the US and the EU. And this approach explains the strange reaction to Putin's proposals ... Russia has not received any responses from the West to its interesting proposals, including proposals for an energy union. "
  21. suharev-52
    +2
    8 March 2012 00: 02
    We must not back down from our proposals and push them through. Politics is the art of compromise. Persia has never been a clear enemy of Russia. Therefore, it is by no means possible to hand it over.