Will the American reconnaissance airship take to the air

13
The United States Air Force, having spent 140 millions of dollars to create a spy airship for military operations in Afghanistan, abandoned Blue Devil Block2, which is one of these types of projects. It became known that the airship-spy "landed" before it took off. Can this curtailment of the project mean future problems with the development of military airship building in general?

Let's take a closer look at Blue Devil Block2 - a project that is on the verge of closing. More recently, the United States Air Force issued a statement on the termination of the program, adding that it is not planned to resume its resumption on the previous platform.

Will the American reconnaissance airship take to the air
M1400 (Blue Devil Block 2) build is almost complete. But he will not fly anywhere, which is a pity. (Here and below is the Mav6 photo.)


The manufacturer - Mav6 - the airship is named model М1400. The airship envelope volume is 37 thousand m³, the speed is up to 150 km / h, the length is 123 m, the ceiling is 6 km, the time of continuous stay in the airspace reaches 9 days. We will compare this unit with the HAV 304, created by the British Hybrid Air Vehicles. Thus, the volume of the American apparatus, the assembly of which is almost completed in Elizabeth City, which is in North Carolina, is close to the volume of HAV 304. The time of continuous flight is three times less. The fact is that the speed of the M1400 is closer to 150 km / h, and for the HAV 304 it is equal to the entire 37 km / h. Of course, for an aircraft used for reconnaissance purposes, this is a significant difference.

One of the important drawbacks of the Mav6 development is the impossibility of landing without releasing helium, due to the fact that the airship is lighter than air. He also can not sit on the water, as does the HAV 304.

However, the point is not only and not so much in the characteristics of the model. For a long time, US military programs existed on the basis of a minimum budget constraint. Funds for military projects were issued almost unlimited. Now the Americans are trying to balance the military budget. But the cost of many types of military equipment is growing. So, during the development time, the M1400 price has increased exactly four times.

Today it costs 180 millions of dollars, which is absolutely shocking to those who were going to finance the project until the bitter end. Today, Americans understand that the further the idea of ​​building a dirigible will be implemented, the more expensive it will cost the state treasury. It seems that the corruption component has also actively manifested itself here. That is why the United States decided to stop funding the program. This is also due to the fact that a similar project can be implemented by British experts at 40% cheaper. Americans learn to count money!

Mav6 tries to justify its requests by the fact that the cost of the electronic model filling is supposedly too high. The sensory system and the onboard data analysis center covers an area of ​​90 square kilometers. And this, they say in the company, is almost 3 times higher than that of the British competitors. In this case, the signals are processed fully automatically, and the sending to the ground center is carried out after a full analysis of the incoming data.

The head of Mav6 is Dave Deptula behind the dirigible dashboard. In M1400, the presence of a pilot was only provided as an option.


However, the experts of DARPA managed to catch the company in a certain amount of guile: the electronic filling of the model, which is civilian and military, is almost identical. And 100 of millions of dollars for an airborne electronics is too expensive, and making a supercomputer out of a dirigible is clearly not part of the task of the modern manual on financing US military projects.

It should be noted that carbon fiber is widely used in the M1400 design. With the design parameters, the cost of parts made of carbon fiber will have to be costly for the customer. In this case, even the option of using carbon fiber is questionable. After all, it is quite clear that the weight of the own design of such an aircraft as a dirigible for its maneuverability is not at all as important as the weight for an aircraft. The airship does not expend energy to maintain itself in the state of flight.

Of course, all these facts do not mean at all that even the very prospect of using airships for reconnaissance purposes remains vague. For example, many models drones cost more than $ 100 million, but can be in the air ten times less in time than, for example, HAV 304. Therefore, it is possible that the Americans, having revised the terms of financing the project, will nevertheless return to its implementation.

Prepared by materials Wired и Computerra – Online.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. lars
    -3
    7 March 2012 09: 43
    Airships are an interesting thing. But for military purposes, I believe their use is limited, especially today. They are very well recommended for use as a UV umbrella, but only cheap and simple. A little more complicated and more expensive - Staged jammers and false targets. But in this format, all this resembles either money laundering, or the guys competently conducted research for army money.
  2. 755962
    +1
    7 March 2012 12: 15
    A very promising development in terms of technology. The range of tasks solved with the help of such devices is huge. But as always in this world, money has outweighed the scales.
  3. +1
    7 March 2012 13: 00
    And how do you like the idea of ​​an airship carrying unmanned aerial vehicles capable of carrying both reconnaissance weapons and military ones. Such an airship flies to some sort of terrain, crashes at high altitude and drops off drone drones. Those rummaging around the neighborhood collecting Old, then the second pratiya-shock. These goals are astounding.
    1. +4
      7 March 2012 13: 52
      they can be used both for observing sea and land borders, and in air reconnaissance, and in early warning systems for objects flying at low altitudes, such as cruise missiles, and for transporting troops, and as sonar submarine detection stations, and in as escort of sea convoys.
      on airships, radar stations can be installed, which, unlike ground ones, have no dead zones. You can also place missile defense launchers on them. Tactical airships are able to provide ground operations in the air supremacy. For example, when conducting police or anti-terrorist actions. A tactical airship can be used to support communications, especially in mountainous areas; conduct reconnaissance using electron-optical equipment.
      From the point of view of resistance to anti-aircraft fire, the airship has an important advantage over the aircraft. Since lift is created by gas lighter than air, even with severe damage, the airship can remain in the air or land. In addition, the airship can stop moving, freeze, and quickly repair the most severe damages, since all types of airships provide the crew with access to the main components and devices, including inside the balloon. In spite of its huge size, the airship can also be masked . The body of the balloon and the nacelle can be made of radio-transparent materials and be practically invisible on the radar. The combination of radio transparency with jamming systems makes even a very large airship resistant to radar detection. Silver or reflective color can dramatically hinder the detection of an airship by optical means.
      an airship with a carrying capacity of 500 tons can become a multi-purpose aircraft capable of performing a wide variety of military functions: carry a wide range of weapons, radar stations, be well-armed and protected by a bomber attack aircraft and a military transport aircraft. Unlike airplanes and helicopters, an airship of the same type can be adapted to perform a variety of tasks.
      The prospects for its military use are large enough to fully justify the costs and efforts to create such an airship. He is able to dramatically strengthen any army and dramatically expand its capabilities.
      1. 755962
        0
        7 March 2012 14: 14
        Respect to Ascetic. Here you dig the info.
        1. +6
          7 March 2012 15: 34
          [quote = 755962] Respect to Ascetic. Here he dug the Old. [/ q

          It’s just that my mother-in-law lived on the airship street in the city where they were produced and tested at one time, therefore I was inspired by this topic and gave the info in general terms to have an idea. And if a concreino on a 500-tonne can accommodate a lot of things, such an airship can be a carrier, for example, of ballistic missiles launched by a mortar method from transport-launch containers (TPK). The R-36M missile, launched from the TPK, had a total mass of 211 tons and provided for the casting of 7300 kg of weight at a distance of up to 16000 km. Such ballistic missiles were used as a means of delivering nuclear charges, but they can very well be used as high-precision weapons and carry a monoblock warhead with explosives or a cluster part. Just 2TPK will carry away.
          It can carry about 150 cruise missiles weighing 1,5 tons. In other words, the airship may well be a carrier of strategic weapons, and the degree of its mobility in this quality is noticeably superior to submarines, car complexes, and even the famous Soviet "missile trains" RS-22V "Scalpel" .Modern airships reach speeds of more than 100km / h. The airship can also be part of the missile defense system, on which you can place both early warning radars and anti-missile guidance radars. In addition, airships can be carriers of various types of anti-ballistic missiles. The short-range missile, type 53T6 Amur, has a starting weight of 10 tons and operates within a radius of 80 km. On the airship can be placed 15-20 missiles.
          It is possible to place an air defense missile system on an airship, for example, a similar S-300 air defense system. Compared to ground based systems,
          the airship can carry more guided missiles and can approach the power of the anti-aircraft missile system to large military vessels equipped with S-300 Fort air defense systems.
          Finally, the airship can also be a carrier of early warning and control equipment, such as AWACS or the Soviet A-50. A rotating radar can be placed in an airship balloon made of radio-transparent materials. Due to the fact that the aircraft has a 2,5 times lower carrying capacity than our hypothetical airship, either a more powerful installation or several radars for various purposes can be mounted on the airship.
          An airship can be a good attack aircraft and carry the most diverse weapons for bombing assault strikes:
          For this role, it is necessary to ensure that the airship can reach speeds of up to 700-800 km / h, which, in general, is quite achievable for modern aircraft manufacturing. Then the airship can take up to 320 adjustable bombs (for example, KAB-1500) with a caliber of more than 1500 kg, which can even hit well-defended objects: fortifications, bridges, dams, airfields, command posts.
          The airship with a carrying capacity of 500 tons surpasses the largest planes and helicopters in its transport capabilities. For example, it can take 1160 soldiers with weapons on board. For comparison, the An-225 can take only half as much cargo.
          In general, in the era of local and mobile wars and modern precision weapons, their role will again increase. No wonder Amers invest money.
    2. 755962
      -1
      7 March 2012 14: 13
      Quote: Syrdon
      And how do you like the idea of ​​an airship carrier unmanned aerial vehicles
      Cool idea! Throw it in the MO. good
      1. 0
        8 March 2012 00: 24
        I fully support the ideas of Ascetic, I myself have been thinking about this for a long time and I do not understand the inaction of our Defense Ministry in this matter. And for peaceful purposes, their use will not be superfluous: cellular communications repeaters, cargo and passenger flows in Siberia and the Far East (with a poorly developed road network)
        1. +2
          20 May 2014 23: 18
          Quote: 320423
          And for peaceful purposes, their use will not be superfluous: ... cargo and passenger flows in Siberia and the Far East
          In this capacity, most likely, only one-time transfer of people and goods or transportation of oversized cargo will be advisable. For constant communication, their profitability is not very ... oddly enough it sounds.
  4. vylvyn
    -2
    7 March 2012 13: 41
    They turned it down because they realized that their developments were smoothly pumping to us. Chapman in America is not, but her cause lives and conquers!
  5. dred
    0
    8 March 2012 10: 33
    Good idea. Interesting why they refused.
  6. Nbus
    0
    8 March 2012 15: 53
    "Will an American reconnaissance airship take off?"
    God forbid.
  7. 0
    20 January 2015 21: 43
    It looks like the American version drank money.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"