Military Review

Commander of the IRGC: the US must liquidate its bases at a distance of 1000 km from Iran

83
The commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC is the elite component of the Iranian Armed Forces), General Mohammad Ali Jafari, speaking before the commanders of the IRGC in Mashhad, said that the United States must first eliminate its bases in the region, and then impose sanctions against Iran. He also noted Washington’s hostility towards Iran, especially to the IRGC, TASS reports, citing an agency Tasnim.

Before taking sanctions against Iran’s defense capabilities, the United States must first eliminate its bases in our region at a distance of 1000 km from Iran’s borders
- declared the general -
Iran has become a major power of regional and even global scale thanks to the spiritual power of the Islamic Republic, the combat power of the Armed Forces and the rocket missiles of the IRGC. Washington should know that it will pay dearly for any miscalculation.


Commander of the IRGC: the US must liquidate its bases at a distance of 1000 km from Iran


Jafari pointed to the "rapid growth" of the strike power of Iranian air, sea and land-based missiles and noted the importance of the country's missile potential as a deterrent force. According to him, the development of the Islamic Republic’s missile program "cannot be the subject of bargaining or bargaining."

On Tuesday, the US administration announced the blacklisting of 18 organizations and individuals supporting Iran’s ballistic missile program, Iranian military procurement and the IRGC.

Earlier on Wednesday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani stated that Iran is fulfilling its international obligations and that the announcement of new anti-Iran sanctions contradicts both the logic and the provisions of the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (SAPA, agreement on the Iranian nuclear program).
Photos used:
http://en.abna24.com/service/archive.html
83 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. DEPARTMENT
    DEPARTMENT 19 July 2017 19: 43
    +6
    A loud statement, of course, but essentially correct ... Israel and the US naturally have no reaction! But we all need such statements in the common struggle for peace in the BV!
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 19 July 2017 19: 49
      +10
      Earlier Wednesday, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said that Iran was fulfilling its international obligations and that the announcement of new anti-Iranian sanctions was contrary to both logic and provisions.

      Well, then take a steam bath laughing These lunatics are soon against themselves; sanctions will begin to be imposed. laughing Someone considers himself Napoleon, who is Sasha of Macedonia, and these bziks impose such sanctions. fellow
      1. pjastolov
        pjastolov 19 July 2017 19: 55
        +12
        Volodya, Iran, agreed on something with Russia, and now it’s just trolling the mattresses, now their move, and they will break loose hi
        1. vovanpain
          vovanpain 19 July 2017 20: 09
          +9
          Quote: pjastolov
          Volodya, Iran, agreed on something with Russia, and now it’s just trolling the mattresses, now their move, and they will break loose hi

          Well, it’s unlikely that they will break loose, it’s not in vain that the Persians fell for about 1000 km. That trolls are mattresses.
          1. pjastolov
            pjastolov 19 July 2017 20: 15
            +9
            Well, it’s unlikely that they will break loose, it’s not for nothing that 1000 km
            so the mattresses will fall off, and they will completely break, but if they get well, I won’t give out military secrets laughing
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 19 July 2017 20: 18
              +5
              The US must first liquidate its bases in our region at a distance of 1000 km from the Iranian borders, the general said

              Ha! Well, where did the Iranian general of the Americans "send" ?! laughing
              In the "erotic" yes travel, or what ?!
              1. cniza
                cniza 19 July 2017 20: 27
                +6
                It looks like the United States is offering a lot of analysis, and they will avoid it, and together with ... we will drive them into a corner.
                1. Dead duck
                  Dead duck 19 July 2017 21: 26
                  +7
                  Quote: cniza
                  and together with ... we will drive them into the corner

                  Well, Russia and especially China do not openly declare their plans.
                  It would be nice if Russia and China as well as North Korea and Iran changed their tone in dealing with mattresses. Four more interesting party would be spread laughing
            2. Dead duck
              Dead duck 19 July 2017 21: 29
              +9
              Quote: pjastolov
              I will not give out military secrets

              Duc, not only from Un, but also from Iran, there are also enough "well done fellows" ready to sacrifice themselves for the sake of the country. In which case, everywhere "pale-faced" get.
              1. pjastolov
                pjastolov 19 July 2017 21: 32
                +6
                In which case, everywhere "pale-faced" get
                are you talking about them
                Immortals - in ancient Persia, the name of the elite troops, combining the features of the guard and regular troops.
                1. Dead duck
                  Dead duck 19 July 2017 21: 36
                  +7
                  About modern ones, they are no worse ... especially if there are special charges winked
                  And those (immortals) took more on the "effect", although the elite were.
                  1. pjastolov
                    pjastolov 19 July 2017 21: 38
                    +6
                    although the elite were.
                    each time has its own elite hi
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. pjastolov
            pjastolov 19 July 2017 20: 17
            +7
            On an erotic  journey, or what ?!
            Madame - ours to you with a brush hi
    2. Evil543
      Evil543 19 July 2017 20: 16
      +5
      I agree, boldly. But .. From discharge, dreams, dreams ...
  2. Baloo
    Baloo 19 July 2017 19: 45
    +12
    Before taking sanctions against Iran’s defense capabilities, the United States must first eliminate its bases in our region at a distance of 1000 km from Iran’s borders
    - declared the general -

    Well done, our guy. Be healthy! drinks Ours would also set the same conditions, but send unnecessary “diplomats” to confirm the firmness of the supreme position angry
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 19 July 2017 20: 02
      +4
      Quote: Balu
      we must first liquidate our bases in our region at a distance of 1000 km from the Iranian borders

  3. Tolstoevsky
    Tolstoevsky 19 July 2017 19: 52
    +4
    Handsome man! I respect
  4. Aspid 57
    Aspid 57 19 July 2017 20: 01
    +7
    This guy reminds him of Saddam Hussein! But in fact, another roll of toilet paper for Americans. If they want it, they will spread it like Iraq.
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 19 July 2017 20: 21
      +9
      Quote: Aspid 57
      This guy reminds him of Saddam Hussein! But in fact, another roll of toilet paper for Americans. If they want it, they will spread it like Iraq.

      They want more than half a century request Oh and patient, oh and patient your striped friends! good laughingEven missile defense in Romania and Poland is deployed against them. laughing
      1. pjastolov
        pjastolov 19 July 2017 21: 01
        +8
        Even missile defense in Romania and Poland is deployed against them.
        but these daredevils about our teachings squeal like cut laughing
      2. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 20 July 2017 00: 01
        +5
        Quote: vovanpain
        Even missile defense in Romania and Poland is deployed against them.

        So therefore, the patient, malicious rhetoric of Iran and the DPRK is a good excuse for any missile defense, and so on. And if Iran or Kim are smeared, then how can they justify missile defense, military bases and aircraft carrier formations in the corresponding region?
        Therefore, they do not touch Iran, because in fact - it is powerless against NATO, and the oil in Iraq has not yet run out.
    2. den3080
      den3080 20 July 2017 06: 24
      0
      here I also remembered the long and unsuccessful war of two Middle Eastern "superpowers" - Iraq and Iran. Together with the quick and total defeat of the Saddam superguards by the Americans and the British (mainly)
      and the speech of the political "seer" Mr. Zhirinovsky
      1. Scratchy doll
        Scratchy doll 20 July 2017 06: 26
        0
        The rapid defeat of Iraq dragged on from 1990 to 2003.
  5. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 19 July 2017 20: 01
    +6
    Therefore, I can give the Iranians only one piece of advice - never to not believe the United States, and continue to arm yourself!
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 19 July 2017 20: 04
      +5
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      Therefore, I can give the Iranians only one piece of advice - never to not believe the United States, and continue to arm yourself!

      And be friends with Russia.
      1. DOCTOR ZLO
        DOCTOR ZLO 19 July 2017 22: 08
        +4
        Quote: Balu
        Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
        Therefore, I can give the Iranians only one piece of advice - never to not believe the United States, and continue to arm yourself!

        And be friends with Russia.

        Why is Iran to be friends with Russia, it is clear, it is not clear why Russia is to be friends with Iran ...
        1. Baloo
          Baloo 19 July 2017 22: 12
          +3
          Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
          Why is Iran to be friends with Russia, it is clear, it is not clear why Russia is to be friends with Iran ..

          This is not only hydrocarbons, it is also strategic materials and a potential partner in a strategically important region, the market for the products of our military-industrial complex.
          1. DOCTOR ZLO
            DOCTOR ZLO 20 July 2017 00: 04
            +3
            Quote: Balu
            Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
            Why is Iran to be friends with Russia, it is clear, it is not clear why Russia is to be friends with Iran ..

            This is not only hydrocarbons, it is also strategic materials and a potential partner in a strategically important region, the market for the products of our military-industrial complex.

            Then I have two questions:
            1. All of the above is available only to Iran?
            2. With what "joy" will Iran give us all this and will the price be the same?
            1. Baloo
              Baloo 20 July 2017 06: 58
              +2
              Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
              Then I have two questions:

              I do not know, this is not my profession. I suppose so. Since our potential enemies are friends with Iran, sending and financing barmales in our Caucasus, then we need to be friends with Iran.
              1. DOCTOR ZLO
                DOCTOR ZLO 20 July 2017 07: 30
                +1
                Quote: Balu
                I do not know, this is not my profession. I suppose so. Since our potential enemies are friends with Iran, sending and financing barmales in our Caucasus, then we need to be friends with Iran.

                And the fact that these "orphans" from Iran armed the Afghan opposition in Afghanistan when there was a limited contingent?
                1. Baloo
                  Baloo 20 July 2017 08: 25
                  +2
                  Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
                  And the fact that these "orphans" from Iran armed the Afghan opposition in Afghanistan when there was a limited contingent?

                  East is a delicate matter, it was a long time ago.
    2. Maki Avellevich
      Maki Avellevich 20 July 2017 06: 00
      +1
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      Therefore, I can give the Iranians only one piece of advice - never to not believe the United States, and continue to arm yourself!



      when you have to shoot shoot don't talk
  6. Aspid 57
    Aspid 57 19 July 2017 20: 08
    +7
    While Egypt was friends with the USSR, he only doused himself and lost territory. By my own dope. It was worth making friends with the United States, as they all got back.
    1. notingem
      notingem 19 July 2017 20: 55
      +1
      Iran has deposits in the West. Business and most importantly numerous relatives. The question is what is more important West or Russia. Think
  7. samarin1969
    samarin1969 19 July 2017 20: 15
    +3
    This is the position of a real statesman. Iran, unlike the "RF", is a sovereign state and can afford an independent policy.
    1. Aspid 57
      Aspid 57 19 July 2017 20: 19
      +2
      Within the framework outlined by the West. In the nuclear issue, they went to the understandable under pressure from the West and the Russian Federation. So the world is free from armed ayatollahs.
      1. Taran 75
        Taran 75 19 July 2017 20: 23
        +7
        Aspid change the flag on the profile picture am who are you we see
  8. vovanpain
    vovanpain 19 July 2017 20: 17
    +7
    Quote: pjastolov
    so the mattresses will fall off, and they will completely break, but if they get well, I won’t give out military secrets

    God forbid namesake yes , striped rags have completely beguiled the shores. hi
    1. pjastolov
      pjastolov 19 July 2017 21: 36
      +7
      striped rags have completely beguiled the shores.
      such a fate
  9. SCHMEL
    SCHMEL 19 July 2017 20: 24
    +4
    The US must liquidate its bases at a distance of 1000 km from ...
    List of countries and zeros can be added wink

  10. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 19 July 2017 20: 26
    +3
    The cheeks are inflated how many times the world has seen for 30 last. years old ? Do you have air defense, man ??? The key question. The second question is - what's out of the flying? Oh, rotten vinaigretic. Here is the answer to all the “statements”. If Russia does not intervene, the bandits from the high road will dissolve you without sentiment. The dilemma, yes, what to do? If you have brains, you will survive.
    Yes, on a barrel of gunpowder the wick burns, however.
    1. Aspid 57
      Aspid 57 19 July 2017 20: 33
      +4
      Why should Russia intervene? Russia in the BV is busy shooting potential visitors to Russia. The American Sunni-Shiite-Jewish disassembly of Russia for hell is not needed. Continuous expenses will be, but in the end it is guaranteed to remain in the cold. After Iran’s reconciliation with the West, Tehran will forget about Russia in five minutes.
  11. Old26
    Old26 19 July 2017 21: 07
    +8
    Quote: vovanpain
    Quote: pjastolov
    Volodya, Iran, agreed on something with Russia, and now it’s just trolling the mattresses, now their move, and they will break loose hi

    Well, it’s unlikely that they will break loose, it’s not in vain that the Persians fell for about 1000 km. That trolls are mattresses.

    Statements of 1000 km - this is a frank bunch in a puddle from the Iranians. The Americans settled 2,5 hundred kilometers from Iran, and if necessary, impose sanctions. Iran will not do anything other than statements. For an open war with the USA for Iran is death. So these are just words and nothing more

    Quote: iliitch
    The cheeks are inflated how many times the world has seen for 30 last. years old ? Do you have air defense, man ??? The key question. The second question is - what's out of the flying? Oh, rotten vinaigretic. Here is the answer to all the “statements”. If Russia does not intervene, the bandits from the high road will dissolve you without sentiment. The dilemma, yes, what to do? If you have brains, you will survive.
    Yes, on a barrel of gunpowder the wick burns, however.

    But what about. There is. Already 4 divisions of the S-300 and a bunch of all sorts of stuff that is unlikely to mate with each other. Of the flying - probably 10-20 pieces of old American F-14 and F-4. a couple of dozen of our quarter-century MIGs that flew after the defeat of Iraq in the 90s. There is some own last-generation super-plane based on, again, the old American F-5. In short, they will tear the Americans in the air like a tusik heating pad

    And why does Russia suddenly interfere? We do not have an agreement on friendship and mutual assistance. Syria and tensions on the border with Ukraine are missing. Also get into Persia? Than?
    1. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 19 July 2017 22: 03
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      Also get into Persia? Than?


      Well, how is it? Deep concern, what else.
      Yes, they will not be touched by Iran, and the trouble of the battle of Un also. So, only the nerves can pat. Because the FEAR returned to them. The brakes refused from them during the drunk, the degradation just exponentially rolled without a competitor, and then suddenly the surprises flew.
      Honestly, I am surprised how quickly they degraded to the level of “expert psaki”.
      Without Russian hackers, they will recover for a long time. Hackers - this is the ambush regiment of Voivode Bobrock.
      We wouldn’t inadvertently kill them, otherwise without competitors we ourselves will quickly become the same freaks.
      I - for the measure of the stupid Don Trump and his squire, the rex-dog of Shtirlitson, our guys. Clintonsha is a dumb messenger. Murka is not even drawn.
    2. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 19 July 2017 22: 17
      +2
      Old26 And why does Russia suddenly interfere? We do not have an agreement on friendship and mutual assistance.

      More reliable than these "allies of the Russian Federation", only the Ottomans ...
  12. Kerensky
    Kerensky 19 July 2017 21: 32
    +5
    Well, somewhere, our "partners" will have to "impose democracy" ... Eun cheats, the IRGC is a serious office .... The question of who can start to beat with "acceptable losses" (it is simply not considered otherwise). The whole world "loves" Americans. Here, as in a showdown in the yard, the authority of the bully will have to be maintained ..
  13. bald
    bald 19 July 2017 21: 52
    0
    Sooner or later, it will reach all of Islam that needs to be united. They, and not only the common enemy, are the states and their accomplices. And then the soft and fluffy animal of America will come.
    1. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 20 July 2017 00: 14
      +4
      Quote: bald
      Sooner or later, it will reach all of Islam that needs to be united. They, and not only the common enemy, are the states and their accomplices. And then the soft and fluffy animal of America will come.

      That's just in America, "soft and fluffy animal" does not stop. what You have a short memory. sad
    2. Arameev
      Arameev 20 July 2017 00: 57
      +5
      Quote: bald
      Sooner or later, it will reach all of Islam that needs to be united, and then the soft and fluffy animal of America will come.
      if "it comes to all of Islam that it is necessary to unite," the soft and fluffy animal will come not only to America and Co. hope to sit on the sidelines? and hello ... the scribe will not pass you by - the united Islam will take care
      1. bald
        bald 20 July 2017 06: 08
        0
        We will take care of ourselves, but here, you will definitely have to "tight". You are well aware that they will start with you. I do not gloat, it is not always possible for the East to hang noodles on the ears and twirl it as you want. They have a very good memory and, unfortunately, they do not know how to forgive.
        1. And Us Rat
          And Us Rat 20 July 2017 18: 17
          0
          Quote: bald
          You are well aware that they will start with you.

          They will start with those with whom it is easier. yes
          Quote: bald
          They have a very good memory and, unfortunately, they do not know how to forgive.

          We too. yes
  14. Old26
    Old26 19 July 2017 21: 54
    +1
    Quote: Kerensky
    The question is, who can start to beat with "acceptable losses" (in another way it is simply not considered). The whole world "loves" Americans.

    Nevertheless, they were able to gather a coalition against Iraq, which, incidentally, included Syria.
    The Americans will not fight directly with Iran, especially alone. If the conflict begins, then aviation and the fleet will be used. but not ground forces. Maybe later, at the final stage
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 19 July 2017 21: 57
      +3
      Quote: Old26
      The Americans will not fight directly with Iran, especially alone.

      Iran needs to create nuclear weapons then they will not attack it.
    2. Kerensky
      Kerensky 20 July 2017 00: 02
      +3
      These are technical points. Let it be so: they HAVE to create a coalition here (while time suffers). But they already have a coalition in the "neighboring yard" (Seoul, Tokyo), maybe a couple more problems may arise, because, as you know, - "beat and dad handy" and ....
  15. Old26
    Old26 19 July 2017 22: 11
    +5
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Iran needs to create nuclear weapons then they will not attack it.

    Iran is a threshold country. She can technically create Yao. Moreover, the most serious stage - she mastered the enrichment of up to 20%. Maybe repeat it. But even the presence of nuclear weapons will not give guarantees. She will be strangled economically. The only exit to the ocean is the Strait of Hormuz. . and the neighbors don’t have particularly warm feelings for them. And in this they will help the Americans. If Iran attacks first, it will be an aggressor, like Iraq in Kuwait. And then it comes to the coalition. And their first use of nuclear weapons - will untie the hands of everyone else
    1. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 19 July 2017 22: 48
      +1
      Old26 If Iran attacks first, it will be an aggressor, like Iraq in Kuwait. And then it comes to the coalition. And their first use of nuclear weapons - will untie the hands of everyone else

      You think politically. Of course, I don’t understand anything in rocketry, but it seems to me that any action / inaction of the Islamic Republic of Iran will untie the hands of its neighbors, so it’s better to beat in the face first, many then whimpering in horror will run away "to hurt" somewhere ...
      1. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 20 July 2017 00: 21
        +4
        Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
        You think politically.

        Is that bad? Does everyone have to be politically engaged? Without this, a person is inferior?
        Politics can blow bubbles until they turn blue, but it wins always as a result, logic, mathematics and physics.
        Politicality is a standard of sanity, in my opinion, a sign of the ability to think independently and draw your own conclusions (the ability not to be a sheep in a herd).
        1. DOCTOR ZLO
          DOCTOR ZLO 20 July 2017 00: 49
          +1
          And Us Rat Politicality is a standard of sanity, in my opinion, a sign of the ability to think independently and draw your own conclusions (the ability not to be a sheep in a herd).

          Dear (?), I think there is no difference in which flock to dwell, they made their choice in favor of the Israeli ...
          1. And Us Rat
            And Us Rat 20 July 2017 01: 13
            +2
            Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
            Dear (?), I think there is no difference in which flock to dwell, they made their choice in favor of the Israeli ...

            Living in a herd, and being part of it, are two big differences. The shepherd dog, in fact, in the herd lives most of his time, but he does not run in the footsteps of the alpha ram. He grazes it.
            1. DOCTOR ZLO
              DOCTOR ZLO 20 July 2017 01: 17
              +1
              And Us Rat Living in a herd, and being part of it, are two big differences. A shepherd dog, in fact, in the herd lives most of his time, but he does not run in the footsteps of an alpha ram.

              What is the difference, reassure yourself by exchanging the skin of a sheep for a dog ...
              1. And Us Rat
                And Us Rat 20 July 2017 02: 27
                +2
                Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
                that I traded a sheep skin for a dog ...

                Not a dog, but a shepherd. tongue
    2. padded jacket
      padded jacket 19 July 2017 23: 02
      +3
      Quote: Old26
      Iran is a threshold country.

      Iran clearly complies with the terms of the Six's treaty on Iran’s nuclear issue.
      Quote: Old26
      She will be strangled economically.

      Yeah, the sanctions against Iran have already been "strangled" since 1979 and now it has been lifted from it, and partially, but only - economic sanctions continue to apply.
      Quote: Old26
      The only exit to the ocean is the Strait of Hormuz. . and the neighbors don’t have particularly warm feelings for them

      The Persian Gulf neighbors are so “weaklings” Iran has excellent relations with Kazakhstan and is acceptable with our country and excellent with China, for example, goods turnover with China is 50-60 billion dollars and unfortunately with us 2-3 billion
      .
      Quote: Old26
      And their first use of nuclear weapons - will untie the hands of everyone else

      It does not need to be used; it is enough to possess it so that the aggressors think about the consequences of their actions.
  16. Winnie the Pooh
    Winnie the Pooh 19 July 2017 22: 32
    +5
    Iranian bases a few kilometers from Israel, and this martyr puts forward some demands ...
    1. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 19 July 2017 22: 51
      +4
      Which ones, announce the list?
      I don’t understand what Israel is afraid of? In the arsenal of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, rubbish has refused to develop nuclear weapons, but what else is needed from the "orphans"?
      1. Winnie the Pooh
        Winnie the Pooh 19 July 2017 22: 54
        +3
        Hizbala is an Iranian process near the border of Israel. He regularly makes terrorist acts against Israel.
        1. DOCTOR ZLO
          DOCTOR ZLO 19 July 2017 22: 55
          +1
          That is not WB IRI ...
      2. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 20 July 2017 00: 29
        +4
        Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
        I don’t understand what Israel is afraid of? Armed with the Armed Forces of Iran.

        And that’s why they will be aiming for civilian population and use terrorist methods (realizing that they don’t shine in open battle). This is Iranian Hezbollah invented such a thing as a suicide bomber. And Iranian advisers taught Hamas and Hezbollah to fire rockets residential quartersand in the morning, when most people sleep in their beds.
        Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
        what else do you need from the "orphans"?

        That would keep their troops in 1000 km from our borders. wink
        1. DOCTOR ZLO
          DOCTOR ZLO 20 July 2017 00: 57
          +2
          And Us Rat This is because the Iranian Hezbollah invented such a thing as a terrorist with a suicide belt.

          Not at all. In the periodicals I read that the IRI used suicide bombers in the Iran-Iraq war, regardless of the losses ..., it probably went from there ...
          Who would have thought that Beirut resort city would turn into Hell ... you had a hand in this too ...
          After the last British soldier left his former mandated territories in 1947, your mess began ...
          1. And Us Rat
            And Us Rat 20 July 2017 18: 51
            0
            Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
            Who would have thought that Beirut resort city would turn into Hell ... you had a hand in this too ...

            You started a mess. Your KGB created the PLO (even the current head of the PA, Abbas, was an agent of the KGB under the pseudonym "Krotov"). The PLO began to undermine power in Jordan (where they were sheltered). For which he was expelled to Lebanon (Black September), where he began to do the same. That is, Hell in Lebanon is the work of your brainchild.
            Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
            After the last British soldier left his former mandated territories in 1947, your mess began ...

            The mess began much earlier - the Arab-Jewish War (1920 − 1948)
            And Britain was the main instigators, pitting Arabs and Jews.
            Attention, the following information threatens to break the template:
            In 1919, Emir Faisal, leader of the Great Arab Revolt against the Turks, signed an agreement with Khaim Weizman and other Zionist leaders to recognize "racial kinship and ancient ties between the Arab and Jewish peoples." The agreement called for "... to support and stimulate large-scale immigration of Jews to Palestine, to help Jewish immigrants settle on the ground as quickly as possible, and to encourage dense settlement and intensive cultivation of the soil."
            1. padded jacket
              padded jacket 20 July 2017 18: 53
              +1
              Quote: And Us Rat
              Attention, the following information threatens to break the template:

              You invent it yourself or you have a center where they produce text for your manuals lol

              Weizmann became the most popular among the leaders of the Zionist movement and one of the recognized leaders of the Jewish people as a whole. In 1918, he led the Zionist Commission, sent by the British government to Palestine to assess the prospects for its future settlement and development. There he met with one of the leaders of the Arab nationalists, Emir Faisal, in the hope of cooperation. Faisal agreed to support the claims of the Zionists in Palestine, provided that the Arab plans for national rebirth are implemented in Syria and Iraq.
              Chaim Weizmann
              http://guide-israel.ru/people/14540-vejcman-xaim/
              1. And Us Rat
                And Us Rat 20 July 2017 21: 09
                0
                But Britain all cheated and pitted among themselves yesterday's allies. Have you discovered something new for yourself? Oh yes, I forgot, it contradicts your training manuals, in which all universal evil is from the Jews. Oops feel
                1. padded jacket
                  padded jacket 20 July 2017 21: 12
                  0
                  Quote: And Us Rat
                  But Britain all cheated and pitted among themselves yesterday's allies.

                  That is, you Jews go to Jerusalem screaming - the death of the Arabs because you were bled by Jews and Muslims of Britain?
                  Well you are a dreamer lol
                  Quote: And Us Rat
                  Oh yes, I forgot, it contradicts your training manuals, in which all universal evil is from the Jews.

                  Not at all
                  1. And Us Rat
                    And Us Rat 20 July 2017 21: 20
                    0
                    Quote: quilted jacket
                    That is, you Jews go to Jerusalem screaming - the death of the Arabs because you were bled by Jews and Muslims of Britain?

                    Is your cause-and-effect microchip overheated, or is it difficult for you to read carefully? Go to bed tomorrow at the plow.
      3. iliitchitch
        iliitchitch 20 July 2017 01: 39
        +2
        Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
        I don’t understand what Israel is afraid of? In the arsenal of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, rubbish has refused to develop nuclear weapons, but what else is needed from the "orphans"?


        Probably self-translucent. Chick - and there is no Iran. Why can’t you do the whole nation for the sake of the Jewish bros? Loving land, this Middle East. And how anxiously everyone there loves each other, damn all these relatives among themselves genetic.
    2. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 19 July 2017 23: 01
      +4
      Quote: vinipuh
      Iranian bases a few kilometers from Israel, and this martyr puts forward some demands ...


      Yes, colleague vinipuh, we have the best. We are Estonia and 2 more sprats, Poland, Ukraine, nipponiya also put forward requirements. And also the punks in the form of SGA and the European Union are also being put forward.
      And personally, I love fishing, from the mornings to the perch-pike we wave. Not far here, km 120.
      In the evening, take a look at the news, what else are they putting forward to us. How many have been ousted again. Do not get used to listening to tea and sheep.
  17. Rusj
    Rusj 19 July 2017 23: 08
    0
    Well, Iran is not a Papuans!
    1. And Us Rat
      And Us Rat 20 July 2017 01: 15
      +3
      Quote: Rusj
      Well, Iran is not a Papuans!

      Advanced Papuans? request
  18. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 20 July 2017 03: 15
    +1
    Not from Iran, but from Fashington! Then there will be a relative order in the world.
  19. HEATHER
    HEATHER 20 July 2017 03: 29
    +2
    This is so. If that. So.
  20. Old26
    Old26 20 July 2017 08: 41
    +1
    Quote: Balu
    I do not know, this is not my profession. I suppose so. Since our potential enemies are friends with Iran, sending and financing barmales in our Caucasus, then we need to be friends with Iran.

    Not always the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

    Quote: DOCTOR ZLO
    You think politically. Of course, I don’t understand anything in rocketry, but it seems to me that any action / inaction of the Islamic Republic of Iran will untie the hands of its neighbors, so it’s better to beat in the face first, many then whimpering in horror will run away "to hurt" somewhere ...

    No one talks about inaction. They can go about their business, but statements such as the fact that clean up your bases at a distance of 1000 km are pure work for your own audience. As long as they fulfill all the conditions of the agreement concluded, hardly anyone will touch them.
    As for the strike first in the neighbors .... Then it was still powerful (the EMNIP passed only after the overthrow of the Shah 5 years) for 8 years, it fought with neighboring Iraq, though it was then quite strong. All these years, the state of the Armed Forces of Iran has not improved in general. In some ways, they made a breakthrough (rocket technology, nuclear infrastructure), but basically the army was outdated (in terms of technology). And now she no longer represents such a formidable siul that she was 30-40 years ago.
    Perhaps the neighbors are “less courageous” than the Iranians, but they are quite well equipped. And modern wars (sorry, I say common truths) - this is primarily a war of cars, a war of motors, not people. And who will win such a war is still hard to say. Iran with its outdated technology of the last century or neighbors.

    Quote: quilted jacket
    Iran clearly complies with the terms of the Six's treaty on Iran’s nuclear issue.

    Yes, it is not in doubt. But the main thing is different. They ALREADY LEARNED. And what and how to do to accumulate material for nuclear weapons - they already know ...

    Quote: quilted jacket
    Yeah, the sanctions against Iran have already been "strangled" since 1979 and now it has been lifted from it, and partially, but only - economic sanctions continue to apply.

    There were no serious, really "suffocating" sanctions for Iran. There were restrictions on oil trade, and not a complete ban on it. There were no restrictions on shipping, etc. That is, the sanctions were rather restrictive in order to "slow down" a competitor / opponent, and not to choke him completely ...
    Military sanctions are a separate issue.

    Quote: quilted jacket
    The Persian Gulf neighbors are so “weaklings” Iran has excellent relations with Kazakhstan and is acceptable with our country and excellent with China, for example, goods turnover with China is 50-60 billion dollars and unfortunately with us 2-3 billion

    All is correct. And good relations with China are still the main consumer of Iranian oil. And with Kazakhstan, not bad, as with us. This is no one arguing. Neighbors, maybe "weaklings" in relation to "fighting spirit", but are equipped not better than Iraq. And the current war is still a war of motors. a war of cars, not a collision of two horse lavas ...

    Quote: quilted jacket
    It does not need to be used; it is enough to possess it so that the aggressors think about the consequences of their actions.

    To think - maybe they’ll think about it. Or maybe not. After all, you understand very well that even if Iran had its own nuclear bomb, the maximum that it could do was hit its neighbors. He cannot reach America yet. In this regard, Eun was in a better position — closer to him. Iran could only theoretically cover Europe with nuclear charges. The number of required missiles delivered to him by North Korea is extremely small. The missile defense base in Romania, in principle, will be able to intercept them. And not the fools of the Persians to strike Europe. Such a blow will unite them all.
    I don’t remember how exactly this thought sounded - when I read it, but the meaning is this. There are two countries that oppose each other. But when a real enemy appears, they unite against him. so here. Now the “opponents” of Iran are allegorical - these are fingers. not a fist. And if, in the presence of nuclear weapons in Iran, the very same US takes aggression against it, then wave Iran a nuclear club, do not wave it - nothing will change. A strike against any of the NATO countries will lead to the fact that even those who are now indifferent to it will unite against Iran. Even Estonia will send a platoon of its soldiers there laughing
    1. padded jacket
      padded jacket 20 July 2017 19: 24
      +1
      Quote: Old26
      There were no serious, really "suffocating" sanctions for Iran

      And what does "suffocating" mean?
      Quote: Old26
      There were no restrictions on shipping, etc.

      That is, sanctions that imply - to drown Iran's merchant ships? This is from the category of fairy tales.
      Quote: Old26
      Neighbors, maybe "weaklings" in relation to "fighting spirit", but are equipped not better than Iraq. And the current war is still a war of motors. a war of cars, not a collision of two horse lavas ...

      Look at Yemen where these "high-tech" warriors have been "stumbling" with their ultra-modern weapons for more than a year.
      Quote: Old26
      After all, you understand very well that even if Iran had its own nuclear bomb, the maximum that it could do was hit its neighbors.

      Why in the neighbors? In the region, in particular in Qatar and Bahrain, there are at least two large US bases with tens of thousands of its citizens.
  21. Old26
    Old26 20 July 2017 19: 56
    +1
    Quote: quilted jacket
    And what does "suffocating" mean?

    And even that means. These are approximately the sanctions that the United States is now proposing in the network against the DPRK and against which China and we are opposed. Well, for example
    1. The ban on the supply of electricity to the country
    2. Ban on the supply of hydrocarbons, such as gas
    3. Blocking foreign accounts. And not only in the USA, but also in other countries
    4. Prohibition (blocking) of shipping, air traffic.

    Like that. On the one hand, it’s not war, on the other hand, a way to destroy the state. Of course, such sanctions will not go through the UN Security Council, we and China will veto it. But they can impose such sanctions with their "bargain". They certainly will not be absolutely asphyxiating, but they can harm the country. They export oil through the strait. And if the “coalition” blocks Iranian ships, the very same Chinese will not take their own. Well, etc.

    Quote: quilted jacket
    That is, sanctions that imply - to drown Iran's merchant ships? This is from the category of fairy tales.

    Why drown. all. It is enough to block a couple of times, possibly with drowning, as shipping will be disrupted. Moreover, as I wrote above, these may not be international (UN) sanctions.

    Quote: quilted jacket
    Look at Yemen where these "high-tech" warriors have been "stumbling" with their ultra-modern weapons for more than a year.

    And they will be. I once, two years ago, talked with a friend who had risen to one big star. We talked about this situation. He had an interesting thought. Against partisan units, any technological army will stall. How the Germans skidded against our partisans, how sometimes we skidded in Afghanistan. But Iran - its army - is not partisan formations

    Quote: quilted jacket
    Why in the neighbors? In the region, in particular in Qatar and Bahrain, there are at least two large US bases with tens of thousands of its citizens.

    In neighbors - I meant within the reach of their funds
    1. DOCTOR ZLO
      DOCTOR ZLO 20 July 2017 21: 05
      +1
      Old26 4. Prohibition (blocking) of shipping, air traffic.
      Like that. On the one hand, it’s not war, on the other hand, a way to destroy the state.

      This is just a war. According to American terminology, sanctions and blockades, as well as a demonstration of the Armed Forces and the willingness to launch a strike and a demonstration of this, are low-intensity military operations.