A batch of UAZ-3163 Pickup delivered to the BBO

37
According to the news agency “Interfax-AVN", The press service of the Eastern Military District reports on the transfer to the disposal of its special purpose formations stationed in the Khabarovsk Territory, the party of new army off-road vehicles based on the UAZ-3163" Pickup ".

A batch of UAZ-3163 Pickup delivered to the BBO


As stated, off-road vehicles are equipped for the installation of weapons and means of protection from fragments, an awning with a removable cape in the upper part. Large-caliber machine guns Kord and 30-mm grenade launcher ATS-17 can simultaneously be on their arms.


Early version of UAZ-3163 Armenian Armed Forces


The servicemen will soon start developing new equipment, which will increase the mobility of special-purpose units and the effectiveness of the tasks to be performed.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    17 July 2017 08: 17
    The tread needs to be larger, the SUV is all the same. And indeed the wheels are thicker.
    1. +7
      17 July 2017 08: 26
      In order to carry commanders from home to the unit, and vice versa, you do not need Uber patency, and no one needs more from him)
    2. +4
      17 July 2017 08: 28
      Quote: vinipuh
      The tread needs to be larger, the SUV is all the same. And indeed the wheels are thicker.

      Everything should be in moderation. UAZ is good in that it can be drowned in that place of the swamp where no other car can reach ...
      1. +3
        17 July 2017 08: 43
        this one will not reach ...
        1. +9
          17 July 2017 08: 46
          Right This is not that UAZ ...
      2. 0
        17 July 2017 12: 16
        as Lopatov wrote, this phrase is not about a patriot ...
    3. +5
      17 July 2017 08: 33
      Normal military cars for ranks no lower than major. Everything will be what women bring to the market. laughing
      1. +5
        17 July 2017 08: 48
        Quote: siberalt
        Normal military cars for ranks no lower than major

        On the other hand, it is much cheaper than to carry the authorities on the "Tigers" 8)))
        1. +1
          17 July 2017 09: 02
          I was once taken in a UAZ in a cage from behind.
        2. +1
          17 July 2017 09: 05
          Quote: Spade
          it is much cheaper than to carry the authorities on the "Tigers" 8)))

          Not much.
          1. +1
            17 July 2017 09: 15
            Judging by the purchases of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, one “Tiger” of the third class of defense is one and a half “Patriot” of the fifth class.
            1. +1
              17 July 2017 09: 30
              Quote: Spade
              one “Tiger” of the third class of defense is a half of the “Patriot” of the fifth class.

              I meant operating costs.
      2. +1
        17 July 2017 10: 22
        stupid sense to write ... it's better to just be silent sometimes
  2. +2
    17 July 2017 08: 27
    In our army there has long been a "famine" for a similar class of machine. But they are very necessary and the struggle in Syria clearly proved their necessity.
    It would only be interesting to look at them in order to understand what went into the troops.
    1. +5
      17 July 2017 08: 43
      Quote: svp67
      In our army there has long been a "famine" on a similar class of machine

      Yes, but judging by the news, they are trying to push them where they are not needed at all.
      The "niche" for the "Patriots" is the transportation of chiefs and logistics support units. That is, the daily activities of the troops. These are not fighting vehicles.

      Ours, apparently, decided to "sovereignly" jump on the rake, following the Americans a long and bloody journey from unarmored HMMWV to Oshkosh L-ATV

      1. +3
        17 July 2017 08: 52
        Quote: Spade
        Ours, apparently, decided to "sovereignly" jump on the rake, following the Americans a long and bloody journey from unarmored HMMWV to Oshkosh L-ATV

        Or maybe this is the Russian version of the "jihad mobile"?
        1. +6
          17 July 2017 08: 58
          Quote: svp67
          Or maybe this is the Russian version of the "jihad mobile"?

          Rather, the so-called support of the national producer, to the detriment of what is really needed. For example,
          http://fb.ru/article/232271/avtomobil-volk-bronea
          vtomobil-dlya-rossiyskoy-armii-grajdanskaya-versi
          ya
          1. +5
            17 July 2017 09: 13
            You "Wolf" do not even remember. The money for its development has long been successfully mastered, and the project is closed. Why is it needed if the MoD already buys the Tigers for some reason?
            Now the developers of “Wolf” are sawing the money of the Moscow Region for the development of an analogue created by the “Defense” for their money and already tested by the military “Scorpion-LSHA-2B”. Five years later they’ll get tired of paying, and the new project will also be closed, like “Tiger-6A”
            1. +3
              17 July 2017 09: 20
              Quote: Spade
              The money for its development has long been successfully mastered, and the project is closed.

              That’s why we have UAZ. And it’s not clear why the state pays pennies. And in the end we get zilch. Maybe in the Consulate GABT, is it time to change Sasha Zolotoy Korytse?
              1. +2
                17 July 2017 09: 51
                Quote: Pancir026
                Maybe it’s time to change the Sasha Golden Trough at the State Academic Bolshoi Conservatory?

                I don’t think that this is his level ... An underhanded struggle on the topic of “who will“ master ”the state defense order and what we will put in the army” is being waged in higher offices.

                GABATU can be blamed for the lack of a clear understanding of what the army needs. Due to the collapse of military science, which began under Gorbachev and was successfully brought to its logical conclusion by Serdyukov.
                It was not necessary to run with "scientific companies", as with a written shell, but to restore a research institute.
                I’ll show you an example close to me, artillery.
                UAV. They drag anything, but not what the gunners really need. And why? Because the 37th research institute, which was specifically engaged in the aviation component of artillery reconnaissance, was closed. And later, the same fate befell the SIC RViA, where some of the experts on this topic moved.
                1. +4
                  17 July 2017 10: 06
                  Quote: Spade
                  GABATU can be blamed for the lack of a clear understanding of what the army needs.

                  So if at the head sits the one who, besides the “donations” and poses of which you please no longer care about anything, surrounded himself with slabs, is it worth to be expected
                  Quote: Spade
                  restore research institutes.

                  Hardly .. in order to restore what you have written about-
                  Quote: Spade
                  37th Research Institute
                  Quote: Spade
                  SIC RViA

                  one must have both a will and a certain courage, which is not even mentioned.
          2. 0
            17 July 2017 11: 09
            Quote: Pancir026
            Rather, the so-called support of the national producer, to the detriment of what is really needed.

            Excuse me, dear Pancir026, you are talking nonsense. Updating the fleet of light vehicles is a very good and right thing and that’s why, first of all, the troops still use the UAZ of old modifications (that is, no air conditioning, no decent conditions), and do you think that the military are not people? Let them go for junk ?! Secondly, not in all cases of special operations, it is necessary to shine armored vehicles (it is automatically target No. 1 always), especially since all armored vehicles weigh clearly more than an UAZ. This is not a big deal.
            1. +3
              17 July 2017 11: 13
              Quote: AndreyS
              are you talking nonsense

              Nonsense to scratch. Your business. At the expense of your Conder in the UAZ .. then there’s also a bath with a masseuse. In general it will be fine.
              Quote: AndreyS
              Rather, the so-called support of the national producer

              What is not clear to you here?
              A crude car in the sun is NOT NEEDED.
              1. +2
                17 July 2017 18: 00
                Quote: Pancir026
                A crude car in the sun is NOT NEEDED.

                Well, buy a NOT RAW car and give it to any military unit (on board you can write - “from ..... military unit .......”. And I’ve been driving and breaking these cars for years now. not more often than foreign cars, although they are clearly inferior in comfort. And, unlike you, dear Pancir026, there is nothing to compare with, before the arrival of an UAZ patriot, we went to old UAZs and it is better to be a patriot (raw) than ancient UAZs.
                And all the military are well aware of what the native Russian auto industry is, only there is nothing better than anyone putting it into service. And conversations, talking, we are all experts and smart people. Only here foreign cars cost a little "a little", and even at this forum people will chant "scumbags for pensioners there is nothing" in the case when they write that some foreign cars were bought for the troops. So decide for yourself, and what equipment you need to supply the military !!!!!
                Yes, and about masseuses with bathtubs, I suggest that you turn off the kandyuk in your foreign car, close the windows and ride for half a day in the heat, having experienced firsthand all the hardships and deprivations that you dear suggest you to experience with the military, and then get out of the car and make a march at least that way for five kilometers with a backpack of 30-50 kg. And after that, write about masseuses and bathrooms.
                What you dear is unclear ?! What does the support of a domestic manufacturer have to do with it ?! So with nonsense I was right. Alas, money for the army and other law enforcement agencies is allocated zilch, so you have to be content with what is and even if there is the possibility of supplying at least some kind of human equipment, then this is happiness for people exploiting it. (By the way, I can add that, compared to the old UAZ, patriots do not save gasoline, state money, by the way).
                So I think NOT YOU DEAR TO DECIDE WHICH CAR NEEDS ALL OF RUSSIA!
                1. +3
                  18 July 2017 15: 01
                  Quote: AndreyS
                  than to compare, before the arrival of the UAZ patriot, we went to the old UAZ and it’s better to be a patriot (raw) than the ancient UAZ.

                  If you think that I do not know what UAZ is and I don’t know what it is like in the fields, you are very mistaken.
                  Quote: AndreyS
                  So decide for yourself, and what equipment you need to supply the military !!!!!

                  Yes, it’s the same UAZ, but not with the private owner in particular, because the price is similar to Land Rover A. Quality is like that of the ancient Ha369.
                  Quote: AndreyS
                  Yes, and about masseuses with bathtubs, I suggest that you turn off the kandyuk in your foreign car, close the windows and ride for half a day in the heat, having experienced firsthand all the hardships and deprivations that you dear suggest you to experience with the military, and then get out of the car and make a march at least that way for five kilometers with a backpack of 30-50 kg. And after that, write about masseuses and bathrooms.

                  Blah blah blah — to address this to me, you need to know who I am, and since you don’t know this, leave your fortune-telling on coffee grounds for attendants at the entrance.
                  Quote: AndreyS
                  What does the support of a domestic manufacturer have to do with it ?!

                  Are you completely inadequate? Despite the fact that the BIG order from MO is the support of its manufacturer, but the purchase of any turbidity like Lynx in Italy.
                  Quote: AndreyS
                  Alas, money for the army and other law enforcement agencies is allocated zilch, so you have to be content with what is and even if there is the possibility of supplying at least some kind of human equipment, then this is happiness for people exploiting it. (By the way, I can add that, compared to the old UAZ, patriots do not save gasoline, state money, by the way).

                  Khekhe, well ... well, you don’t have to tell here, at the expense of saving money on UAZ, I’m not asking about spare parts for it ...
                  Quote: AndreyS
                  So I think NOT YOU DEAR TO DECIDE WHICH CAR NEEDS ALL OF RUSSIA!

                  Well .. think not your horse, however, twist the steering wheel to the glory of the Automotive Industry.
                  1. 0
                    19 July 2017 08: 10
                    Quote: Pancir026
                    Well .. think not your horse, however, twist the steering wheel to the glory of the Automotive Industry.

                    My friend and you HAM! Sorry for the directness.
                    Quote: Pancir026
                    Blah blah blah — to address this to me, you need to know who I am, and since you don’t know this, leave your fortune-telling on coffee grounds for attendants at the entrance.

                    That is, you unfortunately have no normal argument. Only a link to "and you do not know who I am." Well, you respected do not know who I am, and therefore to your above post, about thinking, etc. can be attributed with great success to you and only the last words can be changed to ... to the glory of the foreign automobile industry. I wish you success in your military work for the glory of the Fatherland!
        2. +2
          17 July 2017 09: 01
          Quote: svp67
          Or maybe this is the Russian version of the "jihad mobile"?

          A jihad mobile kit includes a one-time crew. I don’t think we can afford it ...
          1. +1
            17 July 2017 10: 25
            yes with a fig? look at the view from Syria on what are the most common mopers moving? wonder but not on the Tigers.
            1. 0
              17 July 2017 12: 45
              Quote: cariperpaint
              look at the view from Syria on what are the most common mopers moving? wonder but not on the Tigers.

              On an armored personnel carrier?
              You, apparently, pay attention to the American ... Well, they buy them right on the spot, and after use they drop it.
              They themselves are armed with a normal technique, specially designed for their needs. Either in the armored version, or in the air transport (standard standard at this time is transportation in the cargo compartment of the Osprey), the Patriot cannot be attributed to either the first or the second
  3. 0
    17 July 2017 08: 42
    casting generals show off?
  4. 0
    17 July 2017 12: 16
    Quote: Spade
    Right This is not that UAZ ...


    The old UAZ in stock also does not shine with patency. For him to start dragging, it is necessary to put "military bridges", more evil tires, etc., in short, even put the cost of one UAZ on top at least :)
    1. 0
      17 July 2017 12: 24
      Departed on three "runoff old UAZ" with minimal alterations, nonsense about poor traffic it is not necessary to write ...
      and since when did military bridges and evil tires begin to cost like stock UAZ? bridges of titanium chtol?
    2. 0
      17 July 2017 12: 46
      Quote: Bad
      The old UAZ in stock also does not shine with patency.

      Looking with what to compare ... in comparison with MT-LB- it is really not very, and in comparison with "SUVs" it is even nothing.
  5. 0
    17 July 2017 12: 38
    as already wrote in a previous article about a patriot - a car trash ...
  6. 0
    17 July 2017 14: 14
    Jihad mobile, however.
  7. 0
    17 July 2017 19: 00
    And in particular, it is necessary to correctly cut off Western brands of cars, by and large, our plants are not loaded, there is no work, and we feed the enemies by buying them outside the road and so on.
  8. 0
    17 July 2017 19: 52
    Shit is a car ...
  9. +7
    17 July 2017 20: 35
    In glorious times, they had a GAZ-69 mouth for deep reconnaissance, which could be thrown where needed by helicopter, so that the group could quickly rush away from there and bury itlaughing Well, or to move around on them while conducting reconnaissance, but they were almost the size of LuAZ later — it easily disguises itself, hides behind any hillock. And what are these monsters for? AGS and 12,7 machine guns in SPN not seen. And they are not needed there, because Special operations force is, first of all, reconnaissance, which, by definition, does not participate in combined combat. Although, maybe, the Ministry of Emergencies has its own traditions laughing