TVK-2DTS full-composite aircraft took off

91
On Monday, at the Yeltsovka aerodrome in Novosibirsk, the first flight of the all-composite TVS-2DTS aircraft designed and built by the Siberian Research Institute took place aviation them. Chaplygina (SibNIA), reports bmpd.

All-composite aircraft TVS-2DTS developed by FSUE "Siberian Scientific-Research Institute of Aviation. S.A. Chaplygin "in the first flight. Eltsovka (Novosibirsk), 10.07.2017. The fuselage is not painted.

According to the information of the company, “jogging and flying were carried out, and then - a twenty-minute flight that passed successfully.”

According to the resource, “the TVS-2DTS aircraft is equipped with the American Honeywell TPE331-12UAN turboprop engine, the 1100 hp takeoff power. and has an all-composite structure with specially designed wing and carbon fiber fuselage ".



The machine is created under the program of a promising light multipurpose aircraft (LMS) with a capacity of 9 passengers as part of the State program for the development of small aircraft of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia.

  • S.Ivantsov / Alexander Kozlov / russianplanes.net, Comet / aviaforum.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

91 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    13 July 2017 12: 37
    They try to remake the An-2, God forbid, so that something happens. (The best is not always the enemy of the good).
    1. +11
      13 July 2017 12: 53
      Quote: Kamchatka
      They try to remake the An-2, God forbid, so that something happens. (The best is not always the enemy of the good).

      Why doesn’t work? An-2 is also their work laughing , And this aircraft is essentially new, there is nothing from the An-2, only external similarities, and people are all similar in appearance, but no, everything is different inside wink
      1. +7
        13 July 2017 13: 05
        It is high time. The question of such a plane overripe. Unfortunately, in Russia there is no planned economy capable of solving problematic points of transport, and indeed, everything related to the country's vital functions. The liberal ideology continues to reign: "the market will destroy everything", "the private owner is more effective than the state." It does not resolve.
        Maybe now, something will work out. Although considering that the American engine is being put on the plane, the doubts are very big that this plane will go into series.
        1. +1
          13 July 2017 13: 16
          But I’m wondering how such an airplane is visible on radar?
          It is easier to cover a motor with absorbing radio waves than an entire airplane. And everything else is transparent.
          So it turns out that the airplane is civilian, and the technology is being developed by the military.
          good
          1. 0
            14 July 2017 11: 58
            well, it’s not seamless, metal frame, wing mechanization, servomotors, thrusts, cables ... all of this together will give a very good EPR.
        2. 0
          13 July 2017 17: 49
          This aircraft was developed by state order, not everything is voiced in the media, but work is ongoing, money is being allocated. And the control over the allocated money is close.
        3. +1
          13 July 2017 18: 23
          Quote: vladimirZ
          Unfortunately, in Russia there is no planned economy.

          A planned economy is not a panacea, suffers from a lack of flexibility, sins with overspending and monopolism (in the bad sense of the word).
          The public procurement system available to private contractors will do an excellent job if provided transparency competitions, competent state control, and strict anti-corruption supervision of controllers.
          In many countries, this works great (under the 3 conditions that I cited above).
          Py.Sy. Communism is possible when self-reproducing robots will provide all the natural human needs. Until then - any form of socialism will eventually lead to the "dashing 90", this is a socio-economic axiom.
          1. +6
            13 July 2017 19: 40
            A planned economy is not a panacea, suffers from a lack of flexibility, sins with overspending and monopolism (in the bad sense of the word). - And Us Rat

            You reason from a position small in the country, with a mild, warm climate. Russia is a vast country over the territory, which is not found in the world, with a harsh, not always favorable climate, with a short summer, with great labor costs to ensure basic living on it.
            Therefore, no market mechanisms, "equal competitive conditions", it is impossible to ensure a normal human life in it for the whole people.
            Historically, we have only such a system, when the state plays a leading role in all spheres of life, only by the community, the collective can survive and build, including in the economy in our conditions.
            The oblivion of these principles of economic existence has led Russia to constant, ever-increasing economic crises, curtailing economic activity, turning it into a raw materials appendage of more developed countries, to mass unemployment and poverty, and ultimately to complete defeat as a sovereign state.
            Perhaps this is for you, the West, and you need - the everlasting dream of "rolling out" Russia and turning it into a dozen colonial states. We do not. We need an economically strong industrialized state in which all the necessary spheres of life with various forms of ownership will be systematically developed, but with leading state property that is planned to develop.
            And the "market", the private sector, as we already had in the era of the Stalinist economy, will be left with a secondary role where the state economy is not so effective: the service sector, the production of some consumer goods, farming and other trifles. Something like the Chinese economy.
            As the historical experience of the development of such an economy (the USSR, now China) shows, it ensures the highest rates of development, since such an economy is not subject to constant crises, which are inherent in the spontaneous "market".
            So, abandon your "socio-economic axioms" for your own use, we have our own development path.
            1. +3
              13 July 2017 23: 16
              Logically and competently expressed. And the fact that their "army", we do not care))
              1. 0
                14 July 2017 16: 17
                Quote: shvn
                Logically and competently expressed. And the fact that their "army", we do not care))

                The crowd does not sleep laughing Assisting is fate. Yes
            2. 0
              14 July 2017 16: 15
              Quote: vladimirZ
              Russia is a vast country over the territory, which is not found in the world, with a harsh and not always favorable climate, with a short summer, with great labor costs to ensure basic living on it.
              Therefore, no market mechanisms, "equal competitive conditions", it is impossible to ensure a normal human life in it for the whole people.

              Well, Canada does it somehow. request
              Quote: vladimirZ
              Historically, we have only such a system, when the state plays a leading role in all spheres of life, only by the community, the collective can survive and build, including in the economy in our conditions.

              I think that the lack of successful alternative experience does not mean that an alternative is not possible in principle. The road will be overpowered by a walker.
              Quote: vladimirZ
              The oblivion of these principles of economic existence has led Russia to constant, ever-increasing economic crises, curtailing economic activity, turning it into a raw materials appendage of more developed countries, to mass unemployment and poverty, and ultimately to complete defeat as a sovereign state.

              Nevertheless, I am inclined to believe that oblivion of these principles is a consequence, not a root cause. The real reasons are much broader and deeper, and affect not only the economy. The slab that the Gorbachevites used to break up the USSR was nevertheless created precisely by a systemic crisis.
              Quote: vladimirZ
              Perhaps this is for you, the West, and you need - the eternal dream of "rolling out" Russia and turning it into a dozen colonial states.

              I will not go into geopolitics, I will express my personal opinion: The superpowers are evil, everyone else suffers for their interests. If you break up - then all, and the United States, and China and India ... and so on. Whatever countries in the world are larger than Italy or Thailand, because the weak have fewer geopolitical temptations.
              Quote: vladimirZ
              As the historical experience of the development of such an economy (the USSR, now China) shows, it ensures the highest rates of development, since such an economy is not subject to constant crises, which are inherent in the spontaneous "market".

              But it is finite, the USSR collapsed, the PRC was rebuilt on a capitalist track, the DPRK is rotting alive ... And in fact, no one has shown the opposite. request
              Quote: vladimirZ
              So, abandon your "socio-economic axioms" for your own use, we have our own development path.

              Then why is it not visible? And where are the results? Why are there no followers? request
              1. +2
                14 July 2017 16: 50
                I will not go into geopolitics, I will express my personal opinion: The superpowers are evil, everyone else suffers for their interests. If you break up - then all - And Us Rat

                Well, here it is your essence: to destroy everyone, and the Jews will rule the world. It will not be your way. The time will come. Russia will throw off both liberal capitalism and your Jews from power.
                1. 0
                  15 July 2017 02: 38
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  and the Jews will rule the world

                  I didn’t say this, you yourself decided so. Continue to fight with windmills and further, this is a personal matter between you and the cockroaches in your head, I'm not an assistant here. wink
                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  The time will come Russia will throw off and liberal capitalism ...


                  Quote: vladimirZ
                  ... and your Jews from power.

                  This will never happen, because dropping some "Jews", you immediately appoint those those who will replace them. Because hunting is not a witch of fruits does not bear in principle, and the need to seek the extreme in infantile people is indestructible. request
                  But of course, finding the guilty is easier than doing something productive. Breaking does not build. fellow
                  1. +1
                    15 July 2017 06: 22
                    This will never happen, since dropping some “Jews” alone, you will immediately appoint those who will replace them. - And Us Rat

                    They have too much opinion about their own people, and therefore they will expel you everywhere and they will expel you because you “pull the blanket” only at yourself, ignoring the interests of the majority of the people, including the Jewish people. This is not a "witch hunt", it is a struggle for justice for all, not just for the "chosen ones".
                    And no pictures that oahie our desire for common social justice will not help you. The future lies with socialism and planned development, there will simply be no other, even after the destruction of the USSR.
                    1. 0
                      15 July 2017 13: 33
                      You live in a terrible world, condolences. Fortunately for others, it exists only in your head. Yes
                      The main thing is that they would not go into a violent phase.
                      1. 0
                        15 July 2017 14: 43
                        The main thing is that people like you do not interfere in our lives, and Russia doesn’t even experience it, and we will survive like you, no matter what rubbish you impose on us.
                        For sim, I stop talking to you, I'm tired.
                      2. 0
                        15 July 2017 14: 55
                        Quote: vladimirZ
                        The main thing is that people like you do not interfere in our lives

                        Yes yes, we sleep and see, Elusive Joe. laughing
          2. 0
            13 July 2017 21: 08
            The claims described relate to execution, and not to its essence.
            Or that all of the above is not possible for a market economy? for God's sake.
            Not to mention that it is a planned economy that really drives the world - for self-debugging of the economy is fantasy.
            1. 0
              14 July 2017 16: 19
              Quote: Evgeny Strygin
              The claims described relate to execution, and not to its essence.

              And what a solution, live people do, but people are not perfect. The more controversial the system is to human nature, the more the human factor harms it. request
          3. 0
            14 July 2017 11: 13
            Quote: And Us Rat
            Until then - any form of socialism will ultimately lead to the "dashing 90s", this is a socio-economic axiom.

            The trouble is that all these socialisms that were and are essentially a new socio-economic formation around and old inside. It is not possible for society to quickly rebuild. Inertia of consciousness. And with such an imbalance, the system is doomed. She will seek to harmonize form and content. And unfortunately this happened in the case of the USSR. But the process of development of society is ongoing. Sooner or later, a critical mass of people will accumulate which will make it possible for mankind to step into the future.
            1. 0
              14 July 2017 16: 21
              Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
              Sooner or later, a critical mass of people will accumulate which will make it possible for mankind to step into the future.

              I am for it with both hands, but I’m afraid we won’t live, it’s already our grandchildren’s task. what
          4. 0
            14 July 2017 12: 03
            Self-replicating robots do not need communism. Like people as a burden.
            I would think 100 times before creating them.
            1. 0
              14 July 2017 16: 29
              Quote: Vlad.by
              I would think 100 times before creating them.

              And I thought 100 times, all the horror stories about AI go from extrapolating a person’s own qualities to a machine. Man is driven by desires, the root of desires is hormonal processes. Even the most spiritually lofty aspiration is fundamentally instinctive.
              The machine does not have a hormonal system, and therefore there is no incentive to action, there are no instincts, feelings, motivation. Full AI inert, even self-preservation will be alien to him (despite the logical understanding), and he will respond exclusively (rather than initiate), even in the realm elementary thought process. AI will not ask questions (as a person), he will not have a reason for this. Roughly speaking: if you don’t ask, it won’t dance.
              You can create an AI "monster" only by rewriting it in the car human essence / consciousness, with the experience of human being and human imperfections.
      2. +1
        13 July 2017 13: 37
        Quote: Locksmith
        everything is different inside

        Not that word:
    2. +2
      13 July 2017 13: 38
      And where is the video of the flight "Annushki":
    3. 0
      13 July 2017 18: 14
      Quote: Kamchatka
      Redo try An-2

      Well, it’s time to already change the “maize” to something newer.
      Quote: Kamchatka
      God forbid that something happened

      To do this, the aircraft must be cheap and unpretentious like the An-2.
      Py.Sy. - The engine should be developed for him.
    4. 0
      14 July 2017 10: 53
      Omsk under Polezhaev also launched and concluded contracts with northerners about 10 years ago.
  2. +5
    13 July 2017 12: 37
    The only pity is that the engine and screw are American.
    That is, in fact, we only have an airplane body.
    1. +1
      13 July 2017 12: 39
      TVS-2DTS is equipped with the Honeywell TPE331-12UAN American turboprop engine
    2. +3
      13 July 2017 12: 55
      Quote: Zomanus
      That is, in fact, we only have an airplane body.

      In general, this is called a glider, and they had an engine of our own production — a screw, too, all the more so Honeywell is ready to produce an engine in our territory, under license.
    3. +3
      13 July 2017 13: 36
      The engine is on the way
      1. 0
        13 July 2017 16: 00
        Quote: dima9990
        The engine is on the way

        What if not a secret ...
        1. +1
          13 July 2017 17: 52
          Most interesting! So far in open sources only such infa. Do not trust, I see no reason)
        2. +3
          13 July 2017 21: 27
          DP-10. A reliable thing. sad
      2. 0
        13 July 2017 17: 12
        approach to wait a long time? these aircraft were needed ten years ago ...
        1. 0
          14 July 2017 09: 42
          Who cares? the American engine we will collect
    4. 0
      14 July 2017 09: 41
      Who cares? we will collect the engine
      1. 0
        26 July 2017 18: 42
        But what difference does not Siemens seem like and you can not fly to Crimea. As the stupid man said, "DEBILS B. POISON"!
  3. 0
    13 July 2017 12: 47
    Single engine for nine passengers? Has the trend changed?
    1. +6
      13 July 2017 13: 03
      Quote: Vladimir Postnikov
      Has the trend changed?

      This is the base, then the alteration will be stamped.
      A trifle is always in demand, especially for local communications and agriculture.
      1. 0
        13 July 2017 13: 11
        For agriculture, one pilot is required. For patrol aircraft - pilot and operator. All these guys can be equipped with parachutes.
        But passenger planes are a little different.
        1. +6
          13 July 2017 16: 02
          read carefully: "then rework stamped."
          1. +1
            13 July 2017 17: 35
            Quote: Deadush
            read carefully: "then rework stamped."

            If someone does not understand the problem, then no reading will help. Single-engine to twin-engine do not alter.
            1. +5
              13 July 2017 18: 40
              Quote: Vladimir Postnikov
              If someone does not understand the problem, then no reading will help. Single-engine to twin-engine do not alter.

              Are you addressing yourself?
              AN-2, of course, we had only a passenger, judging by your logic.
              And where (in what place) did I write about the 2 engine and from which should there be two?
              1. 0
                13 July 2017 19: 02
                Quote: Deadush
                Are you addressing yourself?

                Of course to myself. Not to you.
  4. +5
    13 July 2017 12: 52
    If the Americans are not stupid, then they will wait until the contracts are signed and then sanctionly ban the supply of these engines, and ours will create something similar for another 5 years
    1. +1
      13 July 2017 13: 27
      Quote: Dangerous
      and our then another 5 years will create something similar

      Created for a long time.
      https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A2%D0%92%D0%94-
      20
      1. 0
        13 July 2017 14: 26
        Quote: Locksmith
        Created for a long time

        At the specified link:
        There is no Wikipedia article with the same title.

        You can:

        find references to this name;
        Find pages that link to this title
        Find matching log entries.
        It seems that there is no such engine.
        1. 0
          14 July 2017 07: 39
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/ТВД-20
    2. +4
      13 July 2017 14: 54
      but why create “something similar” if we already have a turboshaft TV3-117 (Mi-8, Mi-17, Mi-24, Ka-27, etc.) with a power of 1250 electric motors. Design a new gearbox instead of BP-8 (scale it down, taking the gearbox from AI-24 as a basis) and you can immediately install it, you can grind a separate turboprop version, simpler, without a free turbine, and instead of a Hamiltonian propeller, select the appropriate dimensioned screw from NPO Aerosil. It may be necessary to slightly change the design-layout scheme of the airframe due to the fact that our engine is somewhat heavier and larger. But still, there are no problems with remotorization on the domestic product, nor are there any grounds for future sanctions from mattresses.
      1. 0
        7 August 2017 22: 38
        Yes, you do not need to create anything. With the current domestic policy of the state, the country absolutely does not need either a small short-haul aviation or a developed road network.
  5. +3
    13 July 2017 13: 01
    and why the heck is it needed with an American engine? the service will cost a pretty penny ...
  6. +3
    13 July 2017 13: 05
    I think there will be 12-13 passengers. The carrying capacity of this gudgeon is 4000 kg! Cruising 350 km / h, maximum - 450! Range up to 1500 km (this does not mean that you have to fly so much without landing, but this means that all day you can wander from the district center to the regional center and back, without refueling)! From AN-2 he only had a concept.
    And the fact that the engine is Amer’s, so the plane is still of limited production. They will decide on a large series - and the engine will be "tightened." With our open spaces, small aircraft must be revived. Moreover, the minimum speed of this miracle is 40 km / h! That is, with an average wind like a helicopter can land. And in the calm of him 200x200 field - an airfield!
    1. +2
      13 July 2017 13: 27
      Mountain Shooter ...... Cruising 350 km / h, maximum - 450!


      This speed is not available to a biplane. Yes
      .... Moreover, the minimum speed of this miracle is 40 km / h! That is, with an average wind like a helicopter .....
      Where did you get such fantastic data? At a speed of 40 km / h, only crows fly. stop





      .
      1. 0
        13 July 2017 14: 04
        And this plane))), Man, this is true. This is the uniqueness of this aircraft.
      2. +3
        13 July 2017 14: 49
        40 km per hour is real, on tests and demonstration flights on the prototype of this fuel assembly was shown. We fly on the prototype (TVS-2Am), the car is very successful !!
        1. 0
          13 July 2017 20: 10
          At such a landing speed, any pilot will land, maybe not a pilot.
      3. 0
        7 August 2017 22: 40
        Well, the old An-2 has a stall speed of only 60km / h. Landing - 100-110km / h.
  7. +3
    13 July 2017 13: 06
    Unique “Annushka”, for dozens of years modern mount aircraft designers have been trying to upgrade you, but in the end, it all comes down to the extraction of “green cabbage”. They want to make of "Corncob" - "cabbage". angry
    1. +3
      13 July 2017 14: 01
      Quote: askort154
      Unique "Annushka"
      So, they were not going to refuse AN-2, there were many orders for the modernization of the existing fleet, both domestic and foreign customers. Initially, a two-pronged solution to the issue was launched, the modernization of the An-2 and the creation of a new aircraft (topics TVS-2MS and TVS 2TD). Regarding modernization.
      The abbreviation TVS-2MS stands for "turboprop aircraft - 2 crew member modernization of SibNIA." The name of the car had to abandon the abbreviation "An", since it is registered at the Ukrainian state enterprise "Antonov".
      Due to the lack of a modern economical and lightweight engine in Russia, SibNIA decided to install a Honeywell TRE-2-62 turboprop engine with 331 horsepower instead of the AS-12IR piston. The engine can run on various fuels, including aviation kerosene and gasoline.
      One of the priorities of the remotorization of the machine was the maximum preservation of the original design of the An-2, so only its nose was changed. The installation of a new engine with a lower mass led to a change in the alignment of the aircraft, in connection with which a new engine mount was developed and the engine compartment was redesigned to install additional equipment. The new elongated hood is made of modern composite materials.
      The seemingly completely archaic linen cladding of the An-2 wing gives him a huge advantage in practice. It can be easily removed and an audit of the entire power set, which is impossible to do on any modern aircraft of this class. In addition, today, percale is replaced with a synthetic fabric, which already has completely different service lives. Aircraft with such skin have been in operation for over 12 years. In addition, the fabric casing allows the An-2 to have excellent weight returns that no other aircraft can compare with.
      The new car is a separate topic, and about it in this article on VO. As for TVS-2TD, here is his photo.
  8. +1
    13 July 2017 13: 06
    carbon fiber wing and fuselage

    Is carbon fiber in its pure form, not reinforced with duralumin, not fragile?
    I would beware of such a fly. what
    1. +4
      13 July 2017 13: 14
      Quote: Corporal
      Is carbon fiber in its pure form, not reinforced with duralumin, not fragile?

      They are stronger than steel, if used in the form of a composite, the blades of combat helicopters are made of this, they can withstand more than one hit of a 30 mm projectile, duralumin with a honeycomb filler, those that were earlier, tear off. laughing
    2. +1
      7 August 2017 22: 41
      Wake up. Modern passenger aircraft are made with partial use of carbon fiber in a glider.
  9. 0
    13 July 2017 13: 13
    It’s a pity not only that he has an Amersky engine, but also that there wasn’t enough paint on him to paint with the engine!
    1. +1
      13 July 2017 13: 29
      Quote: Berg Berg
      but the fact that he didn’t have enough paint to paint with the engine!

      Composite luggage can also be painted in the matrix, it’s just that it’s not customary to paint near the bottom before the first flight, see the tests, almost all fly unpainted for the first time!
  10. 0
    13 July 2017 13: 31
    In fact, exactly the same participated at the hydro-air show in Gelendzhik in 2016. Or is this the second instance? Then already serial? As for the engines. Unfortunately, we do not have low power turboprop engines. And in the near future is not expected. (words of specialists from the same exhibition.) The same trouble is with middle and heavy class drones. And so the aircraft is beautiful and has characteristics .... The equipment is modern in the cockpit.
    And here is another option.

    And in the cockpit, only a bit dark.
    1. +2
      13 July 2017 13: 51
      Photo 2 is the first stage of modernization of the An-2 - TVS-2MS. Replaced the engine (by the way, several An-2s underwent such modernization and are now in operation)
      Photo 1 is the final modernization of the An-2 - TVS-2DT, although it is more precisely a demonstration aircraft. The second stage is the replacement of horizontal and vertical plumage. The fuselage is unchanged. The third stage is the replacement of the cab.
      In the photo in the article TVS-2DTS - this is not an-2 modernization, this is a new plane!
  11. 0
    13 July 2017 13: 38
    The plot on this occasion and an interview with the director of SibNIA http://www.nsktv.ru/news/technology/v_novosibirsk
    e_gotovyat_k_vystavke_novyy_samolyet_130720170920
    /
  12. 0
    13 July 2017 13: 40
    ..... similar to Antoshka .... flew ... more than once ..... (by passenger) .... impressions of the sea .... +
    ... it’s good that they are dealing with this issue .....
  13. The comment was deleted.
    1. +7
      13 July 2017 16: 49
      Honeywell engine, state propeller, GARMIN navigation equipment, black wing and cockpit. I also get the impression that they are very smart here and instead of an UAZ they make a Range Rover. Of course, improving passenger comfort is very important and necessary, but is it worth the candle? I just would like to see somewhere the numbers of how much such a plane will cost in comparison with the An-2

      I have great doubts that regional airlines will be able to buy such a HighTec. Tickets for flights with a new aircraft will simply be unbearable, which means that planes are unprofitable.
    2. 0
      13 July 2017 20: 16
      I represent carbon fiber on epoxy, I don’t think. It’s very expensive. We have epoxies like dirt, all missiles, containers, boats, and that they just don’t make it. And it’s durable.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. 0
          7 August 2017 22: 44
          What you look for a car is a single, piece of manual production, in which a minimum of automation is involved. Progress does not stand still. On the example of the production of bicycles - carbon frames already quite affordable for themselves are produced massively by industrial methods.
    3. +2
      20 July 2017 18: 39
      My addition:

      An-2 costs about $ 750 thousand, and the new TVS-2DTS will cost, according to the creators, somewhere around 2,5-3 million $. That's all arithmetic ...
  14. 0
    13 July 2017 13: 59
    Quote: Kamchatka
    Redo try An-2

    -----------------------
    The same thought, the corn brothers.
  15. +1
    13 July 2017 14: 17
    A beautiful airplane, nothing to say! And here it is
    "equipped with a Honeywell TPE331-12UAN American turboprop engine with a take-off power of 1100 hp."
    embarrassing. Sanctions do not teach anything!
  16. BVS
    0
    13 July 2017 14: 49
    Quote: uskrabut
    A beautiful airplane, nothing to say! And here it is
    "equipped with a Honeywell TPE331-12UAN American turboprop engine with a take-off power of 1100 hp."
    embarrassing. Sanctions do not teach anything!

    But what if sanctions are taught, will the corresponding engine appear? Unfortunately no.
  17. +1
    13 July 2017 14: 55
    The engine will be ours or licensed, but the carbon fiber glider is cool, well done Siberians.
  18. 0
    13 July 2017 15: 28
    We have been waiting for a long time! Move on, it’s a pity that the American engine can easily shut off oxygen ...
  19. 0
    13 July 2017 16: 52
    Ay Molotsa !!!
    Beautiful and, most importantly, VERY needed car !!!
    God give her 100 years to fly!
    A worthy replacement for Annushka, well done!
    Now, if only effective managers didn’t kill her
  20. +2
    13 July 2017 20: 17
    And they forgot to make their own engine for the plane, very nice. The Americans will close this project whenever they want.
    1. +1
      7 August 2017 22: 49
      What's the problem? Enter the Moscow Aviation Institute or the Moscow State Technical University for the engine faculty. Unlearn 5 years. Then in graduate school for 3 years. Next, you will find a fascinating job for some son of Rogozin (an economist who was put in charge of an aviation design bureau or factory) in low engineer positions due to lack of experience and most likely talent. As a result of many years of fruitful work and study, you will finally be able to design and launch a new ICE for the new An-2. Go ahead.
      1. 0
        7 August 2017 23: 02
        Dreamers. There is a sufficient condition and there is a necessary one. So the question is whether it is enough to be a classmate of Rogozin’s son but not to complete the MAI.
  21. +3
    13 July 2017 21: 19
    Why complicate the design of a biplane glider? The upper wing also has wingtips at an angle. Although it doesn’t affect flow at a speed, it doesn’t affect the bend of the lower wing. This is understandable. The braces are not in fashion. What is easier to come up with? So they will get to the copy of the Death Star. The beak has been increased. The visibility from the cockpit has been reduced. At least down and back. Or is everything in fashion design? And not in the path of aerodynamics and in the future, perhaps, the operation of this pepelats is not from concrete, but from a grassy or gravel airfield, which can only be reached visually. A strange synopsis. Someone is uninteresting to me. I don’t hear anything. About the engine, coating wings, take-off run, fuel consumption, load capacity, capacity. Strange car. This is my opinion. Just for me, An-2, the best hard worker. hiBy the way, it somehow reminds An-3.Nose part.
  22. 0
    14 July 2017 06: 34
    If it’s light, it’s probably eating a little, but the shopper also winds it in the wind.
  23. 0
    14 July 2017 11: 37
    But the cockpit is stupid. I understand that the designers wanted to improve aerodynamics, but there was simply no visibility from the cockpit when landing somewhere in the taiga or on a narrow strip in the foothills. The Aquarium, with a downward view of the AN-2, was not the proto.
    1. 0
      19 July 2017 06: 15
      The aquarium has not gone anywhere. The blister, as well as on the AN-2, extends beyond the fuselage, so you can still look back by sticking the head out of the hull. Here are those videos on YouTube:
      https://youtu.be/ygL86fXfEYA
      It’s just that on this plane the blister is round, and not made up of flat glasses, so it seems that it is flush with the fuselage, but it’s not.
  24. 0
    14 July 2017 11: 48
    But the pilot gets into it - no doors or hatches are visible in the photo. Is it through the lantern of the cabin?
    1. 0
      19 July 2017 06: 17
      Through the cabin as on the AN-2. Emergency hatch in the roof of the cab.
  25. 0
    4 October 2017 16: 28
    Interestingly, at present, the problems of the worst injectivity of the theater and their operation in conditions of increased dustiness have been solved?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"