Military Review

NATO: Alliance's efforts to maintain dialogue with Russia does not bring results

45
NATO’s policy toward Russia in supporting dialogue does not produce the desired result, reports Interfax Statement by the Chairman of the NATO Military Committee, General Peter Pavel.



NATO’s military policy towards Russia is based on two pillars. The first is defense and deterrence. The second is efforts to support dialogue. If in the first sphere we achieve success, then in the second our efforts do not bring the desired result,
Pavel said during a meeting with the head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Viktor Muzhenko.

According to him, the alliance's policy in the military sphere is actively changing.

We do not rely on the number of troops, but on their multinationality, determination and ability, if necessary, to quickly build up a military presence,
explained the general.

The practical embodiment of such a policy is the deployment of advanced multinational battalions in the Baltic countries and in Poland.

Pavel praised the reforms in the Ukrainian army.

Deserves special respect for the way that the APU has overcome in the past three years. The transformation you are undergoing is impressive, despite the fact that the reforms are proceeding in parallel with the conduct of constant hostilities,
he said.

In response, Muzhenko said:

We highly appreciate the support and solidarity that we feel in these difficult times from NATO and all 29 countries. The fact that a representative delegation of the NATO North Atlantic Council is visiting our state on the occasion of the 20 anniversary of the signing of the Charter on a special partnership shows that we are mutually interested in continuing the movement to meet each other.
Photos used:
mil.gov.ua
45 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. KRIK33
    KRIK33 11 July 2017 09: 37
    +8
    “The path that APU has traveled in the past three years deserves special respect. The transformation you are on is impressive, despite the fact that the reforms go hand in hand with constant hostilities ..." The cuckoo praises the rooster for praising the cuckoo ... smile
    1. The black
      The black 11 July 2017 09: 41
      +13
      Quote: KRIK33
      "Deserves special respect the path that the APU have overcome in the past three years

      Yes, few have succeeded in turning the army in such a short time into a bunch of alcoholics, looters and rapists ...
    2. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 11 July 2017 09: 46
      +11
      We sincerely wish) to follow the same respected path to all other armies of NATO countries.
      1. SRC P-15
        SRC P-15 11 July 2017 09: 51
        +2
        Quote: Geisenberg
        Statement by the Chairman of the NATO Military Committee, General Peter Pavel.

        There is a saying: July 12, Peter Pavel - added one in the morning!
        And here: Peter Pavel - added “respect” to the APU! yes
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 11 July 2017 09: 51
      +3
      What could be the dialogue with NATO after? belay Can Russia play the button accordion for them to have more fun military expansion around our borders? am
    4. Vend
      Vend 11 July 2017 10: 10
      0
      So NATO can’t talk. Learn and everyone will understand you.
      1. Baloo
        Baloo 11 July 2017 11: 57
        +2
        So NATO can not talk

        The false hypocritical policy of NATO, the desire to bend the Russian Federation is part of the deliberate elimination of the Russian Federation as a sovereign state, the transformation of the European and our territory as a springboard for a future war with China.
        When the geyropa too late realizes that she herself has become one big target, no one will change anything.
        The transformation of sovereign Ukraine into the territory controlled by Western financial structures and NATO under the external control of a geyropa did not teach anything.
    5. Slovak
      Slovak 11 July 2017 12: 38
      +1
      Do not touch the cuckoo! A rooster praises a rooster!
  2. Tolstoevsky
    Tolstoevsky 11 July 2017 09: 37
    +6
    Something went wrong with the Satanists. Sadness ...
  3. vch
    vch 11 July 2017 09: 38
    +4
    Blah blah blah. And what kind of dialogue between NATO and Russia can be discussed at all? What is the transformation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, of which they are defected in whole units?
  4. Cutter
    Cutter 11 July 2017 09: 39
    +13
    Yes, the APU’s path for the last 3 years deserves “special” respect ... The path of collapse, theft and desertion, not to mention the killings of civilians!
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 11 July 2017 09: 46
      +5
      Hi Sanya! hi The rhetoric of NATO and Matrasia can be safely called the "negative of the photograph" for a long time: everything in them is black - it is white and vice versa. Change the sign in the words of this general to the opposite - you get the real state of things. yes
      1. Cutter
        Cutter 11 July 2017 10: 00
        +8
        Greetings, Pasha! hi hi hi I also like that NATO crawled to the borders of Russia along the entire perimeter, and ... well, they don’t get a “dialogue”! Naive or pretend to be!
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 11 July 2017 10: 01
          +5
          Quote: Cutter
          Naive or pretend

          Neither one nor the other - spoiled !!! am
          1. cniza
            cniza 11 July 2017 10: 09
            +3
            I read the article and thought in what world they live, but not even, I can’t understand what they want.
            1. Cutter
              Cutter 11 July 2017 10: 19
              +6
              Vitya, in the world of happy illusions !!! Visa-free, tomorrow to NATO, then CAVIAR SPOONS IN MAYBAH IN MIAMI !!! WAKE-JACKS WASHED IN EUROPE !!!
              1. cniza
                cniza 11 July 2017 10: 27
                +1
                Okay, the horses, and the NATO generals, why are they blowing water? There is enough money, there are enough posts, they are afraid of fighting and cannot, why are they bullying?
                1. Cutter
                  Cutter 11 July 2017 10: 39
                  +10
                  And it’s expensive, so that there is constant tension near the borders of Russia (and ours!) They are cowards, remember the Crimea, everyone yelled, nobody moved, the Amer destroyer jerked, and he, after being spotted by the "Bastion," went to write the pretzel to the Bosphorus!
                  1. cniza
                    cniza 11 July 2017 10: 43
                    +2
                    So I say - they are afraid and cannot fight, why are they climbing? where is the logic ? or hope in a crowd, so let history be taught.
        2. vovanpain
          vovanpain 11 July 2017 10: 31
          +7
          Quote: Cutter
          I also like that NATO crawled to the borders of Russia along the entire perimeter, and ... well, they don’t get a “dialogue”! Naive or pretend to be!

          What you what you belay This aggressive Russia has moved closer to the borders of the peace block of NATO. yes That's all their logic is Alexander. drinks hi
          1. cniza
            cniza 11 July 2017 10: 40
            +2
            With gray hair to drive such a fool, I am silent, that shoulder straps.
          2. Cutter
            Cutter 11 July 2017 11: 01
            +7
            Ahh, okay, Vladimir! hi Ek you (Russia) was overblown! wink You are angry and aggressive, and we are together ... laughing Bad guys !!!
    2. Lukich
      Lukich 11 July 2017 10: 07
      +6
      Quote: Cutter
      Yes, the APU’s path over the past 3 years deserves “special” respect ...

      yes, a difficult battle path
      1. Ursus
        Ursus 11 July 2017 10: 27
        +2
        2 Lukich, regarding the screen. Banter or this fool really, does this? It's just that I can’t check with a foot in the social network.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Lukich
          Lukich 11 July 2017 10: 38
          +7
          Quote: Ursus
          Banter or this fool really, does this?

          Banter 100%. there are many of them. For example
  5. olhon
    olhon 11 July 2017 09: 43
    +6


    It's better not to say ... laughing
    1. Tolstoevsky
      Tolstoevsky 11 July 2017 09: 52
      +1
      it’s possible [media = https: //coub.com/view/v050]
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 11 July 2017 09: 43
    +3
    Met, exchanged compliments: “Oh, what you have become“ mighty ”, in response:“ yes, what would we do without you? ”The result? Yes, not any other than verbal diarrhea and mention of Russia.
  7. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 11 July 2017 09: 49
    +2
    "but their multinationality"

    "There were cries in nine European languages: the Illyrian natives, tribal to us according to Slavism, the children of Naples and the Germans fought with Russia near Moscow, with the natives of Siberia, with the tribesmen of Cheremis, Mordovians, Zavolzhsky miracle, Kalmyks and Tatars!"
    Memoirs of F.N. Glinka about the Battle of Borodino.
  8. osoboye_mneniye
    osoboye_mneniye 11 July 2017 09: 53
    +1
    "The first is defense and deterrence. The second is efforts to maintain dialogue. If we succeed in the first sphere, then in the second our efforts do not bring the desired result,"

    Everything seems to be clear. The better they hold back, the worse the dialogue. And then they complain, you know ..)
  9. Evil 55
    Evil 55 11 July 2017 09: 53
    +1
    It looks like a conversation between two "doves" from Lyashko ..
  10. aszzz888
    aszzz888 11 July 2017 09: 55
    +2
    We do not rely on the number of troops, but on their multinationality, determination and ability, if necessary, to quickly build up a military presence,

    ... noticeably, especially with Hungarians, tribales, etc. laughing
  11. pvv113
    pvv113 11 July 2017 09: 56
    +4
    NATO: Alliance's efforts to maintain dialogue with Russia does not bring results

    As far as I remember, dialogue is a conversation of at least two parties. In this case, when one side twists the same hackneyed record with an anti-Russian theme, absolutely not wanting to listen to the second side, the dialogue does not work. Naturally, there will be no results.
  12. Sergey956
    Sergey956 11 July 2017 09: 58
    +1
    But I was stupid I could not understand why NATO is gathering troops near the borders of Russia? But it turns out to conduct dialogue with the Russian Federation. It remains to wish the NATO generals only an army of the Ukrainian type and more problems with migrants who will plague LGBT supporters in Europe serving in NATO.
  13. Skay
    Skay 11 July 2017 10: 03
    +2
    Dr. in words: we are crap on your doorstep - talk to us.
  14. prior
    prior 11 July 2017 10: 05
    +2
    In order for the alliance’s efforts to maintain dialogue with the Russian Federation to bring results,
    The State Duma should adopt a decree that the country from whose territory the threat of an attack on the Russian Federation will proceed, in case of aggression, will be subjected to a nuclear strike.
    And then let Poland, Romania, the Tribaltics and other NATO multinational battalions think - to conduct exercises, dig bomb shelters, dig graves .... or maintain a dialogue and negotiate.
  15. Skay
    Skay 11 July 2017 10: 12
    +1
    They will
    Quote: prior
    conduct exercises, dig bomb shelters, dig graves

    So the Master commanded.
  16. Elephant
    Elephant 11 July 2017 10: 24
    0
    NATO is purposefully and actively moving towards the borders of Russia. What can you talk about with NATO?
  17. rpuropuu
    rpuropuu 11 July 2017 10: 25
    +1
    It is useless to “maintain a dialogue” with bandits and psychopaths while they feed on Russophobia; it’s stupid to agree on something with them recourse
  18. nesvobodnye
    nesvobodnye 11 July 2017 14: 24
    0
    I have only 1 question - Peter Pavel - an idiot?
    1. Tolstoevsky
      Tolstoevsky 11 July 2017 14: 39
      +2
      he’s just a general
    2. Roma 1977
      Roma 1977 11 July 2017 21: 02
      0
      He is a military man. Says what prompts him duty. State debt, more precisely.
  19. 1536
    1536 11 July 2017 17: 01
    0
    No, after all, when generals begin to play politics, it is always a big parachute and small wings. This one is also a Czech by nationality. The whites here have already arranged a mutiny in the 1918 year, now they have an heir. How do they all look alike to each other?
  20. 1536
    1536 11 July 2017 20: 17
    0
    Quote: rpuropuu
    It is useless to “maintain a dialogue” with bandits and psychopaths while they feed on Russophobia; it’s stupid to agree on something with them recourse

    Indeed, declare NATO a terrorist, gangster organization, with all the ensuing consequences for it and its members. Terrorists from NATO (banned in Russia) allowed metastases in most post-Soviet countries space - such should be the headlines of newspapers. It is strictly necessary to act with them, and not in the same way as with Hitler on the eve of World War II. Otherwise, everything may happen again.
  21. faterdom
    faterdom 11 July 2017 23: 58
    0
    Are we all interested in boilers? But does the dear Don know that 300000 soldiers, officers and generals surrendered from Paulus, a very gigantic and powerful army with allied Italians and Romanians? And from them then, much later 5000 could return home? And not because they were destroyed in gas chambers and crematoria, but because they had to eat and be treated the same as it was for our people, and it was more than logical and fair to disassemble the rubble of Stalingrad and restore it by prisoners.