Beijing nullified military contacts with Pyongyang

51
The People’s Liberation Army of China (PLA) currently does not maintain any contact with the North Korean military, reports RIA News Statement by Zhou Bo, Director of the Center for International Security Cooperation of the Ministry of Defense of the PRC.

Beijing nullified military contacts with Pyongyang


No, we currently have zero contact with the North Korean military. In the past, we had many contacts and exchanges,
Bo said in an interview with Channel News Asia.

I think this is a reflection of the changes in our relationship for reasons well known to all. China is now in solidarity with the international community in respecting the resolutions of the UN Security Council,
added center director.

He also noted that Pyongyang is seeking direct negotiations with Washington, and China is helping the DPRK authorities in this matter.

Recall, despite tough sanctions from the UN Security Council, North Korea continues to implement its nuclear and missile program. Pyongyang claims that the main goal of nuclear weapons and carrier rockets - to counter the American military threat.
  • RIA Novosti / Ilya Pitalev
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    9 July 2017 08: 33
    From the behavior of Un, the Chinese have a lot of hemorrhoids, like the Russian Federation. It seems that there is a collusion between the DPRK and the United States. Thanks to the North Korean leadership, the Americans are deploying their weapons in the Republic of Korea.
    1. +3
      9 July 2017 08: 50
      Eun may stop nuclear testing, but on the terms of US disarmament. And what will the Americans answer? belay
      1. +4
        9 July 2017 09: 34
        The title of the article is largely an answer to the state of affairs in the world.

        In Washington, ordered- China took a visor. China is not a fighter against the United States and world imperialism.

        Only the strange - two-headed liberal-socialist Russia opposes the imposition of a global world order under the hegemony of the United States.
    2. +3
      9 July 2017 08: 53
      Quote: oleg-gr
      It seems that there is a collusion between the DPRK and the United States. Thanks to the North Korean leadership, the Americans are deploying their weapons in the Republic of Korea.

      I have long written about the same. Knowing Trump's unpredictability, his behind-the-scenes arrangement with Eun is quite possible. In this case, North Korea will receive humanitarian and financial assistance, and the United States will deploy (have already deployed) its "missile defense" in South Korea. Time will tell: if, nevertheless, open negotiations begin between the USA and the DPRK, then we were right.
      1. +4
        9 July 2017 09: 38
        Vsezh is probably being used blindly, given his personality traits and the mentality of society. Those. provoking him to demonstrative tests, based on them further inflating the situation and quietly driving Ohio to Beijing. Of course, the Chinese understand everything and lose face with their cowardice, trying to feed their ally in order to extend their life. In principle, the Han people did this all the time, so their statehood was always doubtful, then the Jurchen, then the Genghisides, then the masjurs ... there will always be a new owner. You can understand China, a directed Sichuan earthquake destroyed the Chinese Los Alamos with a nuclear arsenal, as a result of the collapse of the slopes of the mountains, huge sections of destroyed concrete structures opened their eyes. The rearmament of the army (rather the fleet) he did not finish; there are problems in aviation and rocket science. Apparently the United States decided not to wait for the Chinese to complete everything, and the GDP helped Mr. Xi ... hung the order.
    3. +5
      9 July 2017 08: 54
      Believe the Chinese, do not respect yourself ...! You can’t overthrow the United States .. North Korea is chiri in one place in the United States and you need to sprinkle it with salt constantly .. So that the US does not seem to have sugar!

      Ropes are enough for everyone ... laughing
    4. +6
      9 July 2017 09: 00
      . Pyongyang says the primary goal of developing nuclear weapons and launch vehicles is to counter the US military threat.

      If you want to live, be able to defend yourself, Gaddafi and Hussein did not have such arguments and where they are. And China is just playing its game.
      1. +2
        9 July 2017 09: 10
        Yes, Vladimir. Gaddafi seduced himself about refusing to develop nuclear weapons and got ... In our gaddy world, the West cannot be trusted.
        Quote: vovanpain
        . Pyongyang says the primary goal of developing nuclear weapons and launch vehicles is to counter the US military threat.

        If you want to live, be able to defend yourself, Gaddafi and Hussein did not have such arguments and where they are. And China is just playing its game.
        1. +5
          9 July 2017 09: 30
          Gaddafi himself is the smith of his own happiness. Sanctions were lifted from him at about the same time that Algeria began active arms purchases. What was Gaddafi doing at that time? He dispersed his army. He traded with everyone worse than Indians for every dollar. He repaired his ancient trash for those who are a couple of dollars cheaper + a hauler on an extra bucks.

          The result for the 2011 year:
          Algeria did not have huge stocks of dough - but it had a powerful army with S-300PMU, 636 boats, Su-30MKA and other T-90, beeches, shells.

          Libya had huge reserves of dough but did not have an army (which Gaddafi himself destroyed in favor of certain units of loyal people), nor modern technology (dozens of MRAPs and several thousand FN-2000 rifles for the son’s full-service brigade), nor even modernized equipment especially air defense / air force.

          As a result, Bouteflika took all the zealous oppositionists to the desert for an excursion; they are still walking there since 2011. The West expressed concern about the tough crackdown on rallies and that’s it. For Algeria needs a huge outfit of forces and prepare for the loss of public opinion.

          But Libya was bombed. For there is nothing to defend against the coalition. Losses, if any, are random.
        2. +4
          9 July 2017 09: 30
          Quote: 210ox
          Gaddafi was seduced by the refusal to develop nuclear weapons and received ...

          This is for sure Dmitry hi Gaddafi also had the imprudence to lend to Sarkozy’s election campaign, and he didn’t want to repay his debts, and even introduce a gold dinar. He didn’t like the striped one, although before that they almost kissed his gums.
          Quote: 210ox
          . In our gaddy world, the West cannot be trusted.

          Absolutely right. drinks hi
          1. 0
            9 July 2017 09: 59
            Quote: vovanpain
            It’s for sure that Dmitry Gaddafi also had the imprudence to lend to Sarkozy’s election campaign, and he didn’t want to repay his debts, and even introduce a gold dinar. He didn’t really like the striped one, although before that they almost kissed his gums.

            Vova, in the previous article, you accused me of flooding, I read your comments and I wonder if you yourself sin this?
      2. 0
        9 July 2017 12: 43
        Quote: vovanpain
        If you want to live, be able to defend yourself, Gaddafi and Hussein did not have such arguments and where they are. And China is just playing its game.

        It's like that. After the recent tension between S. Korea and the United States, looking at how the United States trampled in the dressing room of Japan and South Korea could not persuade Eun to surrender and abandon the tests, probably many countries have now thought about how to acquire a nuclear club. The United States itself provokes the world by the fact that only having gained a nuclear argument, any country can more or less conduct its policy without fear of an "invasion of democracy."
    5. +2
      9 July 2017 09: 03
      I don’t know what about the conspiracy, but the fact that the DPRK’s actions are beneficial for the USA is a fact .... an excellent excuse to justify its presence in this region.
      1. 0
        9 July 2017 12: 03
        09.03. The black! In Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, there was never a nuclear weapon. But the Americans are there. In Europe, the 45th also did not have nuclear weapons. But the Americans have been present there since those years.
    6. +1
      9 July 2017 09: 57
      Quote: oleg-gr
      From the behavior of Un, the Chinese have a lot of hemorrhoids, like the Russian Federation. It seems that there is a collusion between the DPRK and the United States. Thanks to the North Korean leadership, the Americans are deploying their weapons in the Republic of Korea.

      It seems to me that for the United States, the DPRK is just an excuse. Even if there were no DPRK, they would still have deployed their missile defense, under the pretext of protecting dolphins from aliens. But for China, the DPRK is a way to deter ...
    7. 0
      9 July 2017 20: 16
      Quote: oleg-gr
      It seems that there is a collusion between the DPRK and the United States.

      "Nonsense" then it should be considered that Iran is also in collusion with the United States, because under the pretext it was his "not born" nuclear weapons that a missile defense system was deployed in Europe, while the missile defense system in Alaska was deployed against penguin atomic weapons that came close to creating lol
      So Pyongyang's nuclear weapons are just an excuse and the US missile defense would appear in Asia under a different “sauce” but it would still appear.
  2. +4
    9 July 2017 08: 35
    Testing nuclear weapons is certainly bad, but North Koreans also need to have a trump card up their sleeve from assaults on their country.
    1. +5
      9 July 2017 08: 46
      As soon as Eun is given slack and abandoned his nuclear and missile programs - the mattresses gobble up the DPRK and do not choke.
      1. +2
        9 July 2017 08: 55
        The People’s Liberation Amia of China (PLA) currently does not maintain any contacts with the North Korean military department, RIA Novosti reports a statement by the director of the center for international cooperation on security issues of the Ministry of Defense of China Zhou Bo.

        Believe written Yes (Director of the Center for International Cooperation on Security Issues of the Ministry of Defense of China Zhou Bo)
        1. +1
          9 July 2017 08: 56
          How do you say: believe so believe ... wink
        2. +2
          9 July 2017 09: 53
          With the highest degree of probability, the way it is. They did not contact Iran directly in the military sphere because of sanctions. But at the same time, most of Iran’s new weapons were created either by local specialists trained in China, or directly by Chinese private firmochki.
          For China, direct contacts in the military are generally quite rare ...
      2. 0
        9 July 2017 11: 52
        Quote: bouncyhunter
        As soon as Eun is given slack and abandoned his nuclear and missile programs - the mattresses gobble up the DPRK and do not choke.

        why do they need it?
        1. +1
          9 July 2017 11: 53
          Ask your question to mattresses.
          1. 0
            9 July 2017 13: 32
            Quote: bouncyhunter
            Ask your question to mattresses.

            asked - they say - do not
  3. +4
    9 July 2017 08: 36
    All that Pyongyang needs from Beijing can fit on a 64 gig flash drive.
    1. +2
      9 July 2017 09: 39
      Coal, ore, high-tech products and components (from which they then collect the wunderwaffles). This will not fit on a flash drive.

      Permanent contacts of leading Chinese research institutes with North Korean will not fit on a flash drive. And without this, Koreans will fill up their bumps, which means their programs will go even slower, and there will be more fireworks for launching rockets, for example.
      1. +1
        9 July 2017 10: 12
        I’ll look like you aren’t aware of the fact that Korea has made a breakthrough in rocket science lately. I also don’t know about economic reforms. I doubt that Koreans buy technological equipment in China, they are not Iran, so that they will not encounter the Chinese counterpart Stuxnet
        Essentially, Korea needs information and technologies that fit perfectly into flash memory.
  4. +2
    9 July 2017 08: 37
    You can’t allow the loss of UN. because a good example - HAVE A BOMB - and everyone reckons with you. It’s interesting to watch them
    1. 0
      9 July 2017 08: 54
      Quote: aybolyt678
      You can’t let Eun lose

      Sorry, I didn’t quite understand who are you suggesting not to lose?
      1. +1
        9 July 2017 11: 00
        Quote: vomag
        I do not quite understand who you are offering

        Kim Jong-un, the village.
    2. 0
      9 July 2017 13: 34
      Quote: aybolyt678
      You can’t allow the loss of UN. because a good example - HAVE A BOMB - and everyone reckons with you. It’s interesting to watch them

      tomorrow Georgia and Ukraine will want a bomb - 'and everyone will reckon with them --- Do you want to say that?
  5. 0
    9 July 2017 08: 48
    Even if it were not for these overseas people, the DPRK would still continue its program on nuclear weapons and launch vehicles. Actually, this is their right, another thing with reason. But once upon a time we were like that. And the Chinese are just muddied, muddied.
  6. +2
    9 July 2017 09: 09
    Weak, food for the strong.
  7. +4
    9 July 2017 09: 56
    Do not contasism, do not contagion, no, no, no, no, did not say the Chinese politely smiling and nodding, zero, full))). Vsera isa daaaa and today no, no, no -A tomorrow? asked the Americans!
    - Tomorrow wake up tomorrow, a new day, a new day. The Chinese answered.

    Well done Comrade X. good
  8. 0
    9 July 2017 10: 29
    Here you have China laid down in the United States; otherwise, these steps of the Chinese cannot be called otherwise.
    1. +3
      9 July 2017 10: 50
      I doubt very much that China has "laid down under the United States." It is one thing to declare the cessation of military contacts referring to various resolutions, and another is the real state of affairs. And contacts and help as they were and remained. Perhaps a little changed the format.
  9. +2
    9 July 2017 11: 44
    Where is Romanov ..? Or DPRK whiskey poisoned .... wink
  10. 0
    9 July 2017 11: 58
    This shows the degree of reliability of such "allies" as China. And if war begins on the Korean peninsula tomorrow, will the Chinese defend the DPRK?
    1. 0
      9 July 2017 12: 34
      Well, once it was already defended without hesitation, and the forces were not the same as now. So do not hesitate, harness it, it is in their immediate interests.
      1. 0
        9 July 2017 13: 54
        then there was the Soviet Union behind China and then there was a confrontation between the two systems, the USSR would not allow the capture of North Korea. Now the situation is completely different.
        1. 0
          9 July 2017 19: 09
          That's right, but in my opinion now that’s why it has become even more critical for China, if they are ready to clash with Spartley, then the DPRK is definitely not fighting, they probably won’t go out in the open, but I think that it’s a million volunteers and resources that will do it. And Russia, too, will not stay on the sidelines, I think that’s why the Americans are so hitherto jumping around with a tambourine, they could have already wailed.
  11. +1
    9 July 2017 16: 29
    China has spun thousands of years of all kinds of Western and Middle Eastern partners along with their treaties and persuasions. Today, military cooperation has been curtailed; tomorrow, deployed. Moreover, the Chinese took and gave the DPRK to the Americans, which in fact is a Chinese province
  12. +1
    9 July 2017 17: 12
    Quote: sauvage
    then there was the Soviet Union behind China and then there was a confrontation between the two systems, the USSR would not allow the capture of North Korea. Now the situation is completely different.

    The Union has not existed for a quarter of a century, and in the 90s, China has not yet gained strength. And North Korea did not yet have nuclear weapons. So why didn’t DPRK capture her then? Maybe because nobody needs it. Do you seriously think that the United States is stopping a dozen charges? After all, strikes will not be in the States, and even then in a single amount
    1. 0
      9 July 2017 19: 13
      No one knows for sure how many there are and what other carriers there are. And it is precisely this that stops the United States, because losses may not be acceptable so much that Vietnam seems like a fairy tale.
      1. 0
        9 July 2017 20: 24
        Quote article: Beijing nullified military contacts with Pyongyang

        Yeah, it’s brought to “zero” that most of the military innovations of the DPRK are very similar to the Chinese models.
  13. 0
    9 July 2017 21: 16
    Quote: oleg-gr
    From the behavior of Un, the Chinese have a lot of hemorrhoids, like the Russian Federation. It seems that there is a collusion between the DPRK and the United States. Thanks to the North Korean leadership, the Americans are deploying their weapons in the Republic of Korea.

    What kind of behavior? DPRK that missiles can no longer be tested? Can Russia be? Yes? Let Russia and China disarm too
  14. 0
    9 July 2017 21: 17
    Quote: Tolstoevsky
    China has spun thousands of years of all kinds of Western and Middle Eastern partners along with their treaties and persuasions. Today, military cooperation has been curtailed; tomorrow, deployed. Moreover, the Chinese took and gave the DPRK to the Americans, which in fact is a Chinese province

    Is everything okay to write with your head? If China does not decide who it will be friends with and against whom it will turn and twist it
  15. 0
    9 July 2017 21: 24
    What did the Chinese want? Everyone tried to dodge the conflict. They built of themselves. No dear have to fight Here is your PLA ("funny regiments") in action and see
  16. 0
    9 July 2017 21: 28
    But Russia needs help from the DPRK. Why not give the DPRK a couple of the latest submarines?
  17. 0
    9 July 2017 21: 29
    Quote: sauvage
    then there was the Soviet Union behind China and then there was a confrontation between the two systems, the USSR would not allow the capture of North Korea. Now the situation is completely different.

    And now they should not allow capture. The border is near.
  18. +2
    9 July 2017 21: 31
    Quote: DEPARTMENT
    Where is Romanov ..? Or DPRK whiskey poisoned .... wink

    He must have been sent to re-education in North Korea laughing laughing They were waiting for him there laughing laughing

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"