Military Review

How to beat X-101: drone filmed strikes of Russian missiles

40
Russia once again used one of the most secret missiles in its arsenal. Bombers Tu-95I attacked terrorists with the help of X-101 long-range cruise missiles.


40 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 6 July 2017 06: 08
    +3
    beautiful ... sorry after the dust settled, not shown.
    1. venik
      venik 6 July 2017 08: 37
      +4
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      beautiful ... sorry after the dust settled, not shown.

      ========
      Why watch there ???? Nothing you have ever seen "holes in the ground"? And there’s nothing else left !!!
      1. The comment was deleted.
  2. NEXUS
    NEXUS 6 July 2017 06: 14
    +2
    After this, there is little left at all ... there was a house, and now a hole. I’m thinking, what will be the missile, which is being developed on the basis of the X-101, if this missile is so accurate, long-range and of such power?
    1. Same lech
      Same lech 6 July 2017 06: 19
      0
      The blast wave is very powerful ... the destruction is strong even if the ammunition explodes a little to the side ... there is no chance for a person to survive.
      1. Gogia
        Gogia 12 July 2017 13: 18
        0
        Recently, the network had shots of caliber entering the building of the ISIS weapons workshop. There it was clear that after falling into a large building, half of it was destroyed, and from the second barmalei they flee. So not all convection ammunition can be solved, unfortunately. Maybe it would be worth putting thermobaric heads ???
    2. tlauicol
      tlauicol 6 July 2017 06: 39
      0
      One-story house number 2 is not even destroyed. 6 on 12m. How many such missiles do the Pentagon need? Thousands and a half. On Shairat, hundreds and a half, if the bands do not bomb
      The accuracy is not bad, but the power is nothing special without YaBCh
      1. NEXUS
        NEXUS 6 July 2017 06: 42
        +6
        Quote: Tlauicol
        How many such missiles do the Pentagon need?

        One missile is enough, X-102.
        1. tlauicol
          tlauicol 6 July 2017 07: 22
          0
          I just didn’t understand what kind of power you are talking about - they didn’t tear down the pyramids, but buildings the size of a garage
          1. dm-itry
            dm-itry 7 July 2017 08: 19
            +1
            Do not tell people what a garage, look at the scale, these are huge hangars. On the Pentagon, of course, one is not enough, but about five with a margin is definitely enough.
            1. tlauicol
              tlauicol 7 July 2017 13: 32
              0
              Huge hangars? 7,5 m rocket larger than the width of two of the three affected buildings one floor high
              1. Gogia
                Gogia 12 July 2017 13: 19
                0
                The frames show stretched images of a rocket in flight. It’s important to shoot at a very high frame rate to see the size of a flying rocket.
      2. bald
        bald 6 July 2017 06: 57
        +1
        There are many on the Pentagon and one (250 kilotons). And here, they combine the "pleasant" with the useful - a test of a new development with a "case". And the amount of charge (not nuclear) at the moment is minimal, there are other buildings nearby.
      3. Khabib Saadulaev
        Khabib Saadulaev 6 July 2017 16: 25
        +4
        These missiles are for precision strikes, and not for mass destruction! There are other missiles for the Pentagon
      4. NOVERU
        NOVERU 6 July 2017 18: 19
        +1
        in the Pentagon in general, as in all of America, the troops of their house relaxed. They don’t wear protective vests.
        and to capture 1 missile base of labor will not amount to 1 group of specialists what our submarines say they hijacked 1 time and did they speak German, so the Germans had to get lule from America for this and now you can scare, you can start fighting on an outlying section of the city to rob a bank a friend (to distract attention), the cops will dissolve here and storm the penta with a pair of urine units of all cavo nada and about ABM 1 deversant will be enough in every home country just by the clock and broads there is no missile defense and you need all the planes and missiles with handles
        1. maylik
          maylik 6 July 2017 22: 31
          0
          What is shkolota doing here, who is not even able to learn a letter at school?
          1. NOVERU
            NOVERU 8 July 2017 16: 34
            0
            sorry, dear, I don’t remember how and where to put periods and commas, forgive me for such minor mistakes, and everything seems to be described correctly, but I’m not 33
        2. Gogia
          Gogia 12 July 2017 13: 20
          0
          What a naive young man you are ....
    3. venik
      venik 6 July 2017 08: 38
      +1
      Quote: NEXUS
      After this, there is little left at all ... there was a house, and now a hole. I’m thinking, what will be the missile, which is being developed on the basis of the X-101, if this missile is so accurate, long-range and of such power?

      =======
      Well, it means a new one - will be MORE long-range, more accurate and more powerful !!!!
  3. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 6 July 2017 07: 31
    +5
    Quote: bald
    There are many on the Pentagon and one (250 kilotons). And here, they combine the "pleasant" with the useful - a test of a new development with a "case". And the amount of charge (not nuclear) at the moment is minimal, there are other buildings nearby.

    Judging by the power of the explosion, I would not say that the minimum is 400 kg, and the error of 5-6 meters does not play a role here anyway. Moreover, in some videos, we see getting directly into the window, as Shoigu would say. This is most likely a greeting G-20 leaders, and negotiators in Astana.
  4. Torkvat torkvat
    Torkvat torkvat 6 July 2017 08: 32
    0
    Better carpet bombing)))
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 6 July 2017 10: 28
      +2
      Quote: Torkvat Torkvat
      Better Carpet Bombing

      Carpets?
      1. Dead duck
        Dead duck 6 July 2017 12: 07
        +8
        no, carpets have little accuracy ... and it blows with the wind.
        better hats, more precisely and more convenient. yes
        1. Khabib Saadulaev
          Khabib Saadulaev 6 July 2017 16: 26
          0
          With ear flaps soldier to shower
      2. NOVERU
        NOVERU 8 July 2017 16: 37
        0
        better cows raid
  5. jovanni
    jovanni 6 July 2017 14: 30
    0
    Sha-a-rrrrah !!! And general as unprecedentedly. The beauty. Sorry a little expensive ...
    1. Vadim Kurbatov
      Vadim Kurbatov 6 July 2017 16: 49
      +1
      Normas if they hit important objects
    2. Snow Shura
      Snow Shura 6 July 2017 17: 16
      +1
      One woman who killed two birds with one stone. And training, and barmaley crumbled. Well, performance characteristics will improve. So it’s more expensive to just hammer at the training ground
  6. zlideny
    zlideny 6 July 2017 16: 16
    +1
    Well done keep it up. The main training ground is to test while where it is means and the movement will only forward.
  7. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 6 July 2017 17: 51
    0
    Everything that was there burned down. And those who were not far from this hell are unlikely to remain with the yokes. And we saw the strength of our weapons, and also acquainted Amers and NATu with Stoltenberg.
  8. Dima Ivanov
    Dima Ivanov 6 July 2017 19: 29
    0
    Nifiga se oil painting "the log flew in"))))
    1. NOVERU
      NOVERU 8 July 2017 16: 39
      0
      the roof of the house flew away
  9. nesvobodnye
    nesvobodnye 6 July 2017 21: 03
    0
    What a drone well done! To everyone who needs it, he clearly showed everything: they say * do not hide your money in banks and corners *, we’ll get everything early even in the toilet)
  10. turishev
    turishev 6 July 2017 21: 27
    0
    Three sheds - cruise missiles - why?
    1. Bars23
      Bars23 7 July 2017 02: 15
      0
      when there came an important bump why not
      1. tlauicol
        tlauicol 7 July 2017 13: 38
        0
        Important Lump does not sit for several hours, or even a day, waiting for the take-off of the Carcasses, refueling in the air, and then the flight of the rockets. Such attacks must be carried out by airborne aircraft or UAVs on duty within minutes.
  11. Bars23
    Bars23 7 July 2017 02: 13
    0
    and someone crawled for a couple of days tracking an object with field commanders, and then he precisely aimed at the target
  12. HEATHER
    HEATHER 7 July 2017 11: 05
    +4
    Nishtyak! The sheds are banging with an expensive rocket. Politics, you understand! Ordinary bombs could handle this, although the tests were carried out on a big one! We must continue. good
  13. Alexey Schetinin
    Alexey Schetinin 7 July 2017 20: 45
    0
    We would have such weapons in the Donbass, otherwise the dill artillerymen would kill the children. The murderers of children and women should be rewarded according to their deserts, first on earth, and only then in heaven.
    1. NOVERU
      NOVERU 8 July 2017 16: 41
      0
      on Donbas for a long time all the trunks have been beaten and specials there
  14. Puper driver
    Puper driver 10 July 2017 00: 10
    0
    Americans have been so thrashing since the 80s. The question is, 1) how much we lagged behind (did not lag behind) from them, 2) how much can we produce, say in a month? After all, there are enough goals. More like another window dress.