Sudan vs South Sudan

13
Sudan vs South SudanSudanese troops supported aviation, invaded South Sudan and advanced through the neighboring territory for seventeen kilometers. The AFP news agency was informed by the Minister of Information of South Sudan, B. M. Benjamin.

As the minister reported, Sudan combat aircraft bombed oil fields and wells to extract water seventy-four kilometers from the border. Sudanese troops occupied Unity province, the heart of South Sudan’s oil production. The fact is that Khartoum does not recognize the sovereignty of its neighbors in this region and makes claims to Juba.

Sudanese authorities have previously accused South Sudan of supporting insurgents operating in several provinces north of the border. However, Juba categorically denied the charges.

The invasion is not the “first swallow” of a regional conflict. A few days ago, Sudanese rebels seized an army base near the South Sudanese border. And Khartoum, for the umpteenth time, accused its neighbors of supporting the operation.

The state of South Sudan gained independence as a result of a referendum (2011). But the division of the country by official borders did not give the parties to the world: Juba and Khartoum can not solve the border disputes and in turn blame each other for supporting the separatists conducting operations in the two countries. In addition, non-friendly neighbors are quarreling for economic reasons: for example, because of prices for transporting South Sudanese oil through Sudan.

As a result, incidents with the use of weapons. Civilians are often the victims of conflicts.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Artur09-75
    +4
    2 March 2012 13: 53
    And the "shitcrats" look at their bickering and rub their dirty paws contentedly.
    1. +6
      2 March 2012 14: 27
      The fact is that this was the task .. And it was done ... Divide and conquer ... Everything is normal ... Negros are beating each other, and Europeans and Americans pump oil for a penny or for an old army
    2. sornetium
      0
      3 March 2012 00: 47
      what prevents your non-"crap" people from doing good in the region? maybe the fact that you, in fact, do not care deeply about the problems of blacks and you do not make bad money selling weapons?
  2. Mr. Truth
    +4
    2 March 2012 13: 58
    Here it is a policy of double standards.
    In the African continent is going ANNOUNCED war against the Christian population. As we can see, the "World Gendarme" sees crimes only when they intersect with his interests.
    1. +2
      2 March 2012 16: 38
      Quote: Mr. Truth
      As we can see, the "World Gendarme" sees crimes only when they intersect with his interests.

      Well., Here's how to look.
      America initiated an arms embargo on the Sudan at the UN back in 2004.
      However, Russia continued to sell through Kenya, as a result, our planes are bombed "peaceful south sudan"
      As a reference ..
      Sudan received 36 Mi-24 attack helicopters between 2007 and 2009, and since 2004, Russia has delivered 33 Su-25 military aircraft to Sudan; Russian instructors participate in training pilots of the country's air forces.
      1. Mr. Truth
        0
        2 March 2012 23: 58
        I do not deny this, but sectarian conflicts in Africa are burning as before.
        1. gor
          gor
          +1
          3 March 2012 10: 15
          I’m wondering who is more double in this case? Or is the proverb on the thief more applicable and the hat is on
  3. 0
    2 March 2012 14: 00
    Showdown in the African style. The government of Sudan itself approved the referendum - in fact, tore the country. Now, apparently, corrects his mistake.
    I wonder how the United States will react, they will also proclaim Sudan an outcast and intervene.
  4. CEO
    CEO
    +1
    2 March 2012 14: 02
    The PC in the photo turned out well)))))
    1. Desert Fox
      +2
      2 March 2012 14: 15
      it turned out well, it would only be cleaned and lubricated, otherwise it would have been akin to the color of the fan and the rubber on a joint part. laughing

  5. sergskak
    0
    2 March 2012 14: 16
    Quote: papss
    I wonder how the United States will react, they will also proclaim Sudan an outcast and intervene.

    They will choose who is more suitable for them for "democracy" and will deliver "humanitarian aid". smile
  6. 0
    2 March 2012 14: 16
    And were there like our peacekeepers? Were you planning to fly away?
  7. sergskak
    0
    2 March 2012 14: 23
    Quote: Alexej
    And were there like our peacekeepers? Were you planning to fly away?

    I would really like to know this. Write who is in the know.
    1. +1
      2 March 2012 14: 29
      In South Sudan there were indeed our peacekeepers, or rather a helicopter group that was engaged in the delivery of humanitarian supplies ... In February, a decision was made to withdraw the groups to Russia due to the abduction of helicopter pilots and helicopter shelling ...
  8. 0
    2 March 2012 14: 50
    Well, most likely here NATO will not stand aside when "someone" divides "American oil"
  9. Vashestambid
    0
    2 March 2012 17: 24
    It’s not those who 6 months ago supposedly peacefully podilil country, it was a holiday everyone was happy, housewarming, and now ...

    Attention! You do not have permission to view hidden text.
  10. Railways
    0
    2 March 2012 18: 08
    The Americans apparently want to make the film "The Fall of the Black Hawk-2". Then let them advance and bring in troops.