The missile potential of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Part 1)

48


In the comments to the recent series of articles devoted to the Iranian air defense system, the readers of the Military Survey expressed the wish that a similar review be published on Iranian missiles designed to destroy ground and sea targets. Today, those who are interested in this topic will have the opportunity to get acquainted with history the creation of Iranian ballistic missiles.



The first operational-tactical missiles appeared in Iran in the second half of the 80-s, these were North Korean copies of the Soviet 9K72 Elbrus complex with the P-17 rocket (GRAU index - 8K14). Contrary to widespread misconception, this type of OTRK was never delivered to the DPRK from the USSR. Apparently, the Soviet leadership, given the close North Korean-Chinese ties, feared that Soviet missiles could get into the PRC. However, in 1979, North Korea was able to circumvent this ban by purchasing three P-17E missiles in Egypt. Also, Egyptian experts helped prepare the calculations and handed over a set of technical documentation.

On the basis of the missile complexes received from Egypt in the DPRK, they proceeded to the forced creation of their own OTRK. This was facilitated by a simple and understandable for the North Koreans rocket design, created by the technologies of the mid 50-s. All necessary to play the rocket P-17 base in the DPRK was available. Since the middle of 50, thousands of Koreans have been trained and trained in the USSR, and with the help of the Soviet Union, metallurgical, chemical and instrument-making enterprises were built. In addition, in North Korea, Soviet-made air defense missile systems and anti-ship missiles with liquid-propellant engines, which used the same components of fuel and oxidizer as in the P-17 rocket, were already in service. We must pay tribute to the North Korean scientists and designers, they knowingly ate their own bread and the tests of the first rockets at the Musudanni range began in 1985, only 6 years after they became acquainted with the export version of the Soviet OTRK. Certain difficulties have arisen with the control system, the unreliable operation of the magnetic semiconductor counter-decisive device of the automatic stabilization machine did not allow for achieving stable firing accuracy. But in the end, the DPRK managed to create its own analogue of the automation system, although less reliable and accurate than Soviet equipment. Already in 1987, in the Pyongyang factory number 125, it was possible to bring the rate of release of the missiles, which received the designation “Hwaseong-5”, to 8-10 units per month. According to expert estimates, about 700 missiles were built in the DPRK. Iran was the first foreign buyer of North Korean complexes.

According to its characteristics, the North Korean counterpart was very close to the famous Scud-B. According to the reference data, “Hwason-5” with a launch weight of 5860 kg could have thrown a warhead weighing about 1 tons to a distance of up to 320 km. In this case, observers noted that the reliability and accuracy of the destruction of missiles made in the DPRK, was worse than the Soviet prototype. However, it is quite combat-ready weapon against areal targets such as airfields, large military bases or cities. What was not so, has long been confirmed by Hussites, who launched rocket attacks on Saudi objects. The greatest threat can be posed by missiles equipped with "special" or chemical warheads.

North Korea, where the independent production of OTRK was established, became the main supplier of missiles for Iran. But the first Soviet-made P-17E missiles came to Iran, most likely from Syria and Libya. Together with missiles, Iran imported 9P117 launchers on the four-wheel wheeled chassis of the MAZ-543А. Having received several hundred OTRKs, the Iranian calculations used “Hwason-5” at the final stage of the Iran-Iraq war during the “war of cities”. When the warring parties, exhausted during the fighting, struck at major cities. He couldn’t have any impact on the situation on the front, exchanging missile strikes, and led only to civilian casualties.

The missile potential of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Part 1)


At the end of the 80-x missiles P-17 and the copies created on their base were already outdated, refueling with toxic fuel and a caustic oxidizer, requiring the use of special protective equipment, caused a lot of trouble. The handling of these components has always been associated with a high risk. After the oxidizer had been drained, a washing and neutralization of nitric acid residues in the tank and pipelines was required to conserve the life of the rocket. But, despite the difficulties of operation, the relative simplicity of the design and low cost of manufacture, with acceptable characteristics of range and accuracy, this primitive by modern standards rocket is in service in a number of countries so far.

After the end of the Iran-Iraq war, cooperation between Iran and the DPRK in the development of rocket technologies continued. With the help of the North Koreans in the Islamic Republic, they created their own version of the Soviet P-17. The rocket, known as Shahab-1, had the same characteristics as the prototype. According to American data, the production of ballistic missiles in Iran began even before the end of the war with Iraq. Following the first option, in the middle of the 90, the Shahab-2 model followed.


Shahab-2


According to its scheme, the rocket did not differ from Shahab-1, but thanks to the increased fuel and oxidizer reserves by 200 kg and the forced engine, the launch range reached 700 km. However, a number of experts suggest that such a range can be achieved with a lightened warhead. With a standard warhead, the range will be no more than 500 km. According to some reports, the Shahab-2 is nothing but the North Korean "Hwason-6". Currently, Iran has several dozen mobile launchers and up to 250 Shekhab-1 / 2 missiles.

25 September 1998 of the year during the military parade was shown Shahab-3, largely repeating the North Korean No-Dong. According to the high-ranking Iranian military, this rocket with a liquid-propellant engine is capable of delivering a 900 kg warhead to the 1000 km range. Following the Shahab-3, modifications of the Shahab-21С and Shahab-3D were adopted already in the 3 century. Although during the tests that began in the 2003 year, the rockets often exploded in the air, by the 2006 year, according to Iranian data, the launch range was able to reach the 1900 km. In this case, the missiles can be equipped with a cluster warhead containing several hundred fragmentation and cumulative submunitions. Shahab-3 are classified as medium-range ballistic missiles, and can attack targets in Israel and the Middle East.


Shahab-3


If for the “Shehab-1” and “Shehab-2” units, a chassis based on the MAZ-543А was used, then “Shehab-3” missiles are moved in a closed trailer. On the one hand, this facilitates masking, but on the other hand, the permeability of the towed conveyor is not very large. In 2011, there was confirmed information that OTR "Shehab-3" with an increased launch range is placed not only on mobile transporters, but also in disguised fortified mine launchers.


Rockets of the “Shehab-3” family with different head shapes


According to information published in the Iranian media, in the “Shehab-3” missiles built after 2006, thanks to the use of the new control system, the QUO 50-100 meters were achieved. It is not known whether this is true, but most Western experts agree that the actual deviation from the aiming point may be 10-20 times as much as stated. On the Shahab-3D modification, an engine with an adjustable thrust and deflecting nozzle is used. This allows you to change the trajectory of the rocket and makes it difficult to intercept. Late modifications "Shehab-3" to increase the range of start-up have the shape of the head, which resembles a baby bottle or felt-tip pen.



2 November 2006 of the year in Iran began large-scale military exercises, which lasted 10 days, during which dozens of missiles were launched, including Shehab-2 and Shehab-3. It is believed that the Iranian industry is able to produce 3-4 missiles "Shahab-3" per month and in the armed forces of the Islamic Republic can be 40-50 transporters and up to one hundred and fifty missiles of this family. A further option for the development of liquid missiles of the Shahab-3 family was a medium-range ballistic missile Ghadr.

In the photos taken during the military parade in Tehran, it is clear that the new MRBD is longer than the Shehab-3, and may have a launch range longer than 2000 km. But the main difference from the early models was the abbreviated pre-launch preparation. If an 3-2 hour is required for the transfer of Shehab-3 from a marching to a combat position and preparation for launch, then Gadr can start within 30-40 minutes after receiving an order. It is possible that in the rocket of this modification it was possible to proceed to the "ampu lating" of the components of the fuel and oxidizer.


MRBG Ghadr during the parade in Tehran


Although “Gadr”, like “Shehab”, is largely based on North Korean rocket technologies, Iranian specialists from ShIGH (Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group) managed to significantly improve the basic design. The trials of the MRHP Ghadr began in the 2004 year. In 2007, an improved version of Ghadr-1 appeared, which, apparently, was put into service.

August 20, 2010 Iranian news Irna reported successful tests of the “new generation rocket” Qiam-1. This ballistic missile is more compact than the Shahab-3, and, apparently, is intended to replace the OTP Shahab-1 and Shahab-2. It is noteworthy that with dimensions similar to the early Iranian OTP, the Qiam-1 does not have external aerodynamic surfaces. This suggests that the control and stabilization of the rocket occurs with the help of a deflectable nozzle and gas rudders.


Qiam-1


Range characteristics and weight of the Qiam-1 warhead are not disclosed. According to expert estimates, the launch range of this missile does not exceed 750 km with the weight of the 500-700 warhead kg.

Since mobile launchers for OTR and BRSD are highly vulnerable, many rocket bases with capital shelters have been built in the Islamic Republic. Part of the Iranians use the North Korean and Chinese experience, having built several long tunnels. The rockets in these tunnels are inaccessible for destruction using air attack weapons. Each tunnel has several real and false exits, and it is extremely difficult to fill each one of them, as well as to destroy all concrete bunkers with one blow. The most large-scale complex with capital shelters was built in the province of Qom, 150 km south of Tehran. Here in the mountainous area on the site 6х4 km, more than 300 bunkers, dozens of tunnel entrances and dumped launch pads were built. According to Iranian representatives, such missile bases, although smaller, are scattered throughout the country, there are only 14 underground missile systems in Iran.



This was first officially confirmed by 14 on October 2015 of the year, when a video was published in which Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizade, commander of the aerospace forces of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, visited the underground missile system.



Some underground structures, where ballistic missiles are stored and maintained, are of such size that launch is possible through specially punched holes in the arches, which are usually covered with armor covers and camouflaged. In the 2016 year, after aggravation of relations with Saudi Arabia, it was stated that the storages of rockets were overcrowded, thus the authorities of the Islamic Republic hinted that they could get rid of the surplus by launching rockets in Riyadh.


Google Earth Satellite Snapshot: Capital Shelters in Qom Province


In addition, the Iranians are constantly playing "cat and mouse" by moving disguised trailers with medium-range missiles around the country at night. To say for sure, this is a false goal or real, it is impossible. To launch ballistic missiles in Iran prepared a lot of capital positions. Often, converted sites for the deployment of obsolete Chinese air defense systems HQ-2 (Chinese version С-75) or concreted sites near the rocket garrisons are used for this. When starting from a previously prepared position, the pre-launch preparation time is reduced, and there is no need to make a topographical reference to the terrain.


Google Earth Satellite Image: Shahab-3 Rocket Base in East Azerbaijan


A typical example of such an approach is the rocket garrison near the town of Sardraud in Eastern Azerbaijan. Here, before 2003, a part of the air defense was stationed, where the HQ-2 complexes were in service.


Google Earth Satellite Snapshot: Shahab-3 BRSD on the former position of the HQ-2 SAM System


In 2011, the military base that was used to store obsolete weapons and ammunition was reconstructed, new large-sized hangars and recessed reinforced concrete shelters were built here. The dilapidated position of the HQ-2 ADMS was also put in order. The satellite images show that, starting from the 2014 year, the 2-3 BRSD combat position is constantly in position.

On the basis of the Shahab-3 ballistic missile, the Iranian Safir launch vehicle was created. The first successful launch of the Iranian satellite took place on 2 on February 2009 of the year, when the carrier rocket Safir launched the Omid satellite into orbit at an altitude of 245 km. 15 June 2011, the upgraded Safir-1В rocket delivered the Rasad spacecraft. 3 February 2012 of the year to the near-earth orbit with the same carrier was delivered to the satellite "Navid". Then luck turned away from the Iranian rocket engineers, the next two Safir-1В, according to satellite imagery, exploded on the launch pad or fell immediately after takeoff. A successful launch took place on February 2 2015, when the Fajr satellite was delivered to orbit. According to Iranian data, this device is capable of maneuvering in space, for which gas generators are used.

Although the Iranians are very proud of their achievements, these starts have no practical significance and are still experimental. A two-stage carrier rocket "Safir-1В" with a launch mass of about 26 000 kg can launch a satellite weighing about 50 kg into orbit. It is clear that such a small-sized apparatus cannot work for a long time and is unsuitable for reconnaissance or retransmission of a radio signal.

High hopes in Iran are connected with the new carrier Simorgh (Safir-2). The rocket with a length of 27 meters has a starting mass of 87 tons. According to the design data, Simurg should put into orbit 500 km in height a load of 350 kg. The first flight tests of the carrier took place on 19 on April 2016 of the year, but their results were not published. The United States expresses great concern about the creation of missiles with such characteristics in Iran, since in addition to launching satellites into orbit, carriers of this class may well be used to deliver warheads overseas. However, when using Simurg as an ICBM, it has a significant drawback - a long preparation time for the launch, which makes it extremely unlikely to be used as a means of retaliation.

All launch vehicle launches and most of the test launches of the Shehab and Gadr MRSD were carried out from the launch sites of the testing ground in the Semnan province.


Google Earth Satellite Image: Launch Site of the Safir Launch Vehicle


A few kilometers to the northeast of the launch site of the Safir LV, two large launch sites were built for heavier missiles. Apparently, one of them, where there are tanks for storing liquid fuel and an oxidizer, is intended for the Simurg launch vehicle, and the other for testing solid-propellant ballistic missiles.


Google Earth Satellite Image: Simurg Launch Launch Site


Speaking about the development of Iranian missiles, one cannot fail to mention such a person as Major General Hassan Terani Moghaddam. As a student, Moghaddam took an active part in the 1979 Islamic Revolution of the year. After the start of the Iran-Iraq war, he joined the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Moghaddam, unlike many religious fanatics, being an educated person, did a great deal to strengthen the Iranian artillery and rocket forces. Under his leadership, the first combat use of Iranian ballistic missiles took place in 1985, after which he was appointed commander of the missile units. On the initiative of Moghaddam, the development of the first Iranian Naze'at solid-fuel tactical missile and the reproduction of North Korean liquid missiles began. In the 90-ies, Moghaddam focused on the creation of missiles capable of reaching the territory of Israel and the US military bases in the Middle East region. At the same time, he sincerely believed that only the presence of long-range ballistic missiles equipped with non-conventional warheads in the future will ensure the sovereignty and security of the country. In addition to liquid-propellant rockets, more simple and cheap tactical solid-fuel Zelzal rockets were developed, designed to hit targets in the enemy’s operational rear. The experience gained in the creation of solid-fuel missiles with a range of 80-150 km, allowed in the future to proceed to the design of Sejil MRSD. Simultaneously with the creation of missiles designed for its own armed forces, Moghaddam had a hand in that the missiles that were at the disposal of the militants of the Shiite Hezbollah movement became much more perfect. Terani Moghaddam died in the very dawn of 12 forces on November 2011 of the year. While visiting a group of Iranian high-ranking military rocket arsenal of Modares, in the vicinity of Tehran, a powerful explosion occurred there. Seventeen people died together with Moghaddam.



The main enterprises of the Iranian rocket production company SNIG, where rockets are being assembled, are located in the suburbs of Tehran. At the beginning of 2015, a report was shown on Iranian television from the ceremony of handing over the Ghadr-1 and Qiam-1 missiles to the armed forces. As stated by the Iranian Defense Minister, Brigadier General Hossein Dehgan, the Iranian industry is able to fully meet all the needs of the army, and in the event of an attack on the country, the aggressors will receive a crushing response.



However, the further potential for improving liquid rockets based on the Soviet P-17 design has been almost exhausted. In modern conditions, the use of liquid tactical and medium-range ballistic missiles looks like a real anachronism. Refueling with poisonous fuels and caustic inflammable combustible oxidants not only increases the preparation time for launch, but also makes the missiles themselves dangerous for calculations. Therefore, from the middle of 90-x in the IRI, work was carried out on the creation of solid-fuel missiles. In 2007, there was information that a new two-stage solid-fuel medium-range missile was developed in Iran. A year later, it was announced the successful trials of the Sejil BRSD with a launch range of 2000 km. Finishing tests lasted until the year 2011, when it was announced that the upgraded version of the Sejil-2 was adopted.


Running Sejil-2


At the start of the 2011 of the year, in an inspection test, two Sejil-2 missiles delivered inert warheads to a remote region of the Indian Ocean, confirming the declared characteristics. A rocket weighing 23620 kg and a length of 17,6 meter was first shown at the 22 September 2011 military parade of the year. Just like the Shahab-3 MRSD, new missiles with solid-fuel engines are placed on a towed launcher. An important advantage of Segil is the shortening of prelaunch preparation several times as compared with the Shehab missiles, and solid propellant rockets are much simpler and cheaper to maintain. There is no reliable information on the scale and pace of deployment of the Segil MRSD. In Iranian television reports, a maximum of 4 launchers were simultaneously shown, but how many rockets the Iranian military actually has is unknown.

Many foreign observers believe that the Iranian leadership, devoting significant resources to the creation of combat missiles, is ahead of the curve. The Islamic Republic has already developed its own missile school, and in the future we can expect the appearance of ballistic missiles with intercontinental range. Simultaneously with the accelerated development of rocket technologies in Iran, until recently, the nuclear program was actively developing. Iran’s desire to possess nuclear weapons almost led to armed confrontation with the United States and Israel. Thanks to the efforts of international diplomacy, the Iranian "nuclear problem", at least, was formally able to translate into a peaceful plane. But, anyway, there is no doubt that the work on this topic in the Islamic Republic of Iran continues, albeit not as intensively as in the recent past. Already, Iran has reserves of highly enriched uranium, which creates prerequisites for the creation of nuclear explosive devices in the foreseeable future.

The Iranian top military-political and spiritual leadership in the past has repeatedly stated the need for the physical destruction of the state of Israel. Naturally, with this in mind, the Israelis are very keenly responding to attempts to create nuclear weapons and the improvement of Iranian missiles. In addition, Iran actively opposes itself to the Middle Eastern oil monarchies, which are entirely dependent on the United States. However, the United States and its allies refrain from attacking Iran, as a quick and bloodless victory over the armed forces of the Islamic Republic is impossible. Having no chances to win, Iran is quite capable of inflicting unacceptable losses on its opponents. And the available missile arsenals should play their part in this. Iranian ayatollahs, driven into a corner, may well give the order to strike with missiles, the warheads of which will be equipped with chemical warfare agents. According to the information published on the official website of the Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation, industrial production of blister and neuroparalytic poisons has been launched in Iran. In the case of the use of rockets by poisonous substances in American bases and large Middle Eastern cities, the consequences will be catastrophic. With high probability we can assume that Israel, subjected to chemical attack, will respond with a nuclear strike. It is clear that no one is interested in such a development of the situation, and the parties, despite the contradictions and outright hatred, are forced to refrain from rash steps.

In addition to operational-tactical and medium-range missiles, Iran has a significant number of tactical and anti-ship missiles. But this will be discussed in the next part of the review.

Based on:
http://svr.gov.ru/material/2-13-9.htm
http://www.nti.org/learn/facilities/285/
https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/shahab-2/
http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/iran-confirms-secret-nuclear-quds-site/
http://www.uskowioniran.com/2014/03/irgc-asf-takes-mass-delivery-of-latest.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/10229480/Iran-launch-site-likely-for-testin
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    4 July 2017 16: 38
    Thank you, Sergey! drinks
    As always, excellent material, unique photos and our own analysis (which is generally rare wink )
    regarding this:
    unreliable operation of the magnetic semiconductor counting and solving device of the stabilization machine
    I will venture to suggest that this is about memory modules on ferrite rings bully the ambush was still that
    I congratulate connoisseurs on the start of a new cycle good
    1. +6
      5 July 2017 05: 31
      Quote: A1845
      Thank you, Sergey!
      As always, excellent material, unique photos and our own analysis (which is generally rare)

      Thank you Michael! Something a long time ago did not intersect. drinks
      Quote: A1845
      I will venture to suggest that this is about memory modules on ferrite rings

      In the past, it was possible to operate communication equipment where such modules were used, there were no special problems with them. Although of course the dimensions of the equipment ... belay
      1. +3
        5 July 2017 10: 38
        Quote: Bongo
        there were no special problems with them
        if you don’t touch them! but if you’re trying to fix the program’s work by changing them, it’s a song and a dance with a tambourine ..
        1. +5
          5 July 2017 13: 08
          Quote: A1845
          if you don’t touch them! but if you’re trying to fix the program’s work by changing them, it’s a song and a dance with a tambourine ..

          On our equipment there was no possibility of flashing, the module stupidly wrote "0" or "1". There were other bunters, with a set of slats in cassettes. wink
    2. 0
      26 February 2018 18: 16
      Without a nuclear warhead it's rubbish
  2. +7
    4 July 2017 17: 02
    Thank! Very interesting! I happened to be in Iran a couple of times and cross the pass on the way from Tehran to Noushehr, and I myself saw what was only accumulated in the mountains ....
  3. +5
    4 July 2017 17: 06
    Glory to the government of Iran leading a righteous struggle for its independence! The article is wonderful, thanks to the author.
  4. +7
    4 July 2017 17: 20
    Thank you for the article. I deeply respect Iran. It would be interesting to visit there, especially in the museum of the revolution and the holy war.
    1. +11
      4 July 2017 17: 53
      In Iran, there are many interesting places, however, many "pagan" antiquities were destroyed by religious Muslims or torn apart by brick in their buildings (because it’s not a sin). The people themselves are very beautiful — women have snow-white skin and delicate regular features — the ancient breed is felt — simply beautiful, men are also beautiful — practically European in appearance, only hairy too and have nothing to do with the ub ... that is shown in the form of King Xerxes , in the famous Hollywood libel "300 Spartans" (in the latter, and not in the ones where Richard Egan, Ralph Richardson, etc. were shot). What struck me then was that in many villages there were still working ancient metal smelting furnaces, near which one could observe all the stages of medieval metal processing, and this was done not for tourists, who practically do not exist in Iran. Unfortunately, at the time, it was inconvenient for me to be required to escort from the Guard Corps .. But it was a long time ago, back in the 90s, maybe a lot has already changed ...
  5. +6
    4 July 2017 19: 35
    An excellent continuation, after articles about Iran’s air defense good
  6. +9
    4 July 2017 19: 53
    Thanks for the nice review.
    Persians are a very intelligent people. With brains.
    As they say, their energy would be, but for peaceful purposes ...
    But I am sure that when the current misunderstanding with the Ayatollah state ends, Iran will become a developed and rich country. fellow
    1. +8
      4 July 2017 20: 31
      You know, here I absolutely agree with you. I then communicated decently with ordinary people and with some "bosses" of the lower echelon, and strangely enough, they are less Muslim than many I have observed and are observing in other countries — they were already weighed down by all these ayatollahs and more drawn to Zoroastrianism , some even secretly followed some pagan traditions, but in general, Iranians like "Europeanism", especially women. But here they have strong guards and secret intelligence services .... although, even then, one of the "IRGC" secretly delivered moonshine to me .... wink
    2. +6
      5 July 2017 04: 24
      Quote: voyaka uh
      But I am sure that when the current misunderstanding with the Ayatollah state ends, Iran will become a developed and rich country.

      The process that goes. The current leadership of Iran, despite the bellicose rhetoric is no longer as fanatical as 30 years ago. But once between Iran and Israel were partnerships. Confrontation is not good for anyone, maybe when a new generation of politicians comes, relations between your countries will normalize.
  7. +6
    4 July 2017 20: 18
    I wonder why such a small country like Iran would simultaneously produce two similar missile systems (Sejil-2 and Shahab-3) at once?
    Why is there so much strength and perseverance in developing ballistic missiles if they do not have nuclear weapons? KVO several hundred meters without special warheads, this is for chickens to laugh.
    And of course, the author, as always, is at his best, “you won’t drink skill” lol
    1. +7
      5 July 2017 05: 41
      Quote: Großer Feldherr
      I wonder why such a small country like Iran would simultaneously produce two similar missile systems (Sejil-2 and Shahab-3) at once?

      With similar range characteristics, these are very different complexes. Missiles created on the basis of the Soviet P-17 - this is yesterday. They are very complex and dangerous to operate and preparation for start-up takes a lot of time. The future lies with solid-propellant military missiles, and the IRI understands this well.
      Quote: Großer Feldherr
      Why is there so much strength and perseverance in developing ballistic missiles if they do not have nuclear weapons? KVO several hundred meters without special warheads, this is for chickens to laugh.

      Do not tell. No. Can you imagine how many troubles a warhead weighing 1000 kg equipped with Zoman or VX undermined over a megalopolis can do? The number of civilian casualties will be in the thousands. And if there are several such missiles ... sad
      Quote: Großer Feldherr
      And of course, the author, as always, is at his best, “you won’t drink skill”

      Thank you, but I'm not addicted to alcohol, although I can support a good company. drinks
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      8 July 2017 18: 44
      specially for the dvoeshnik ... Iran and the Globe. And not a miserable map of Google (Merker) distorting the territory
    4. The comment was deleted.
  8. +2
    4 July 2017 21: 03
    "The Iranian top military-political and spiritual leadership in the past has repeatedly stated the need for the physical destruction of the state of Israel"
    Yes? This is when it declared? And who? What nonsense
    1. +10
      4 July 2017 21: 39
      “The Zionist regime is an old wound on the body of the Muslim world, this wound must be removed,” Rouhani said.
      “If the supreme leader gives an order, then, given the level of our training and equipment, we will destroy the Zionist regime in less than eight minutes,” said Ahmad Karimpur, an elite military subdivision. Al Quds.
      The last hour will not come until the Muslims fight against the Jews and kill all the Jews ... ”
      This Hadit is pronounced in all mosques of the world every Friday.
      “We will definitely eliminate Israel,” the commander in chief of the Iranian army, Major General Ataollah Salehi, promised to destroy Israel in the foreseeable future.
      And does Russia assume this regime as its ally?
      1. 0
        7 July 2017 15: 41
        Quote: Shahno
        Does Russia assume its regime as its ally?


        I am 100% sure that Iran will not do anything without a team from Russia or from China

        In fact, the Iran satellite and vassal of both Russia and China is in their camp against the United States and the West
        1. +4
          7 July 2017 15: 44
          But of course, we all need to be sympathetic to the position of Israeli citizens. if for all of us Iran is a friend and almost an ally - then of course for the USA of Europe, the Saudis and Israel, he is a frank enemy

          if I lived in Israel and was a Jew, I would definitely write all the same
        2. +2
          7 July 2017 15: 50
          Quote: Talgat
          I am 100% sure that Iran will not do anything without a team from Russia or from China

          And how can Russia influence the Islamic Republic? Remember how the Iranian leadership refused to return spent nuclear fuel for reprocessing or a lawsuit against the Russian Federation after the introduction of an arms embargo.
          Quote: Talgat

          0
          Talgat Today, 15: 41 ↑
          Quote: Shahno
          Does Russia assume its regime as its ally?


          I am 100% sure that Iran will not do anything without a team from Russia or from China

          In fact, the Iran satellite and vassal of both Russia and China is in their camp against the United States and the West

          Iran, like China, has no allies, but only temporary travel companions. Although the influence of China is much greater than Russia.
        3. The comment was deleted.
    2. +4
      4 July 2017 22: 37
      Quote: Ilja2016
      Yes? This is when it declared? And who? What nonsense

    3. +4
      5 July 2017 04: 28
      Quote: Ilja2016
      Yes? This is when it declared? And who? What nonsense

      Choose the expression sir and engage in self-education! fool Unlike Damantsova, Seryozha does not engage in fantasies and always checks the sources of information. Are there many authors who confirm that written by satellite images?
    4. +7
      5 July 2017 05: 44
      Quote: Ilja2016
      Yes? This is when it declared? And who? What nonsense

      In order not to write such comments, increase your educational level and horizons! hi
  9. +5
    4 July 2017 21: 05
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Thanks for the nice review.
    Persians are a very intelligent people. With brains.
    As they say, their energy would be, but for peaceful purposes ...
    But I am sure that when the current misunderstanding with the Ayatollah state ends, Iran will become a developed and rich country. fellow

    Here it is necessary to say something disgusting. So rushing hatred of Iran. Watch out for the language. Totally insolent. No conscience?
    1. +6
      5 July 2017 04: 30
      Quote: Ilja2016
      Here it is necessary to say something disgusting. So rushing hatred of Iran. Watch out for the language. Totally insolent. No conscience?

      Religious obscurantism has not yet made any country rich and comfortable for its citizens. Or do you disagree with that?
      1. +5
        5 July 2017 05: 20
        Iran is a very developed and comfortable country, especially for its citizens. There is no obscurantism there, in broad daylight gay parades also do not suit. Yes
        1. +8
          5 July 2017 05: 50
          Quote: wazza
          Iran is a very developed and comfortable country, especially for its citizens. There is no obscurantism there, in broad daylight gay parades also do not suit.

          Besides the gay parades, there are no other arguments? A state whose leaders are calling for the physical destruction of another people and where the clergy determines politics is unlikely to have a chance of stable development. I have equal respect for both the Israelis and the Persians, and I really do not want that between these peoples things come to war. Strange as it may seem, the military are often more pacifists than politicians and couch fighters.
          1. +5
            5 July 2017 06: 13
            What other people? In Iran, the genocide of Armenians and Kurds in neighboring secular Turkey? Or do they treat the Jewish community and the local shrines of Judaism badly?
            What is wrong with the clergy determining politics? Which gopnik from the dressing room is not held in high esteem? Have you encountered this phenomenon yourself? In Israel, rabanut is involved. About how ceremonially gays and others chop heads, come see in neighboring Saudi Arabia, where the official religion is Wahhabism (banned in Russia) and by the way slavery is officially allowed. Or in what neighboring "obscurantist" emirate, for which there is no word at all from their industry, medicine, science like Iranian. Only sand, visiting migrant workers from Bangladesh, camels, skyscrapers, beaches and oil under them.
            The Islamic revolution in Iran was just that they threw the corrupt American Shah out of the country and divided his wealth and the wealth of his associates. In Israel, some also did not like it, there are many rich. Iran is a stably developing country. This also does not like many. She was called Islamic only because she was led by the clergy. Sergius of Radonezh who blessed with Peresvet and Oslyaby were extremists? Well, from some point of view - maybe ... laughing
            1. +4
              5 July 2017 06: 23
              Quote: wazza
              What other people?

              Will you deny that the Iranian leadership has called for the physical destruction of Israel in the recent past? This, in my opinion, greatly spoils the international image of Iran and, by and large, largely justifies anti-Iranian western hysteria. You can respect the Iranian achievements, but you also should not idealize this country. In Soviet times, the USSR in Iran was called "junior satan", while the United States was "big satan".
              1. +2
                5 July 2017 06: 33
                This is a state. For his destruction from the Arab countries who just did not call. And even in the attempts of this half participated. laughing
                As for the USSR, they may have made a mistake ... Yes
                but, with its anti-religious propaganda, did it not only slightly harm the cause of Soviet-Iranian friendship?
                The United States is not a Christian, and not even a secular, Masonic country, most Muslims have an attitude towards them.
                idealizing this country now is difficult.
                1. +3
                  5 July 2017 06: 46
                  Quote: wazza
                  This is a state. For his destruction from the Arab countries who just did not call. And even in the attempts of this half participated.

                  And these attempts have benefited? No. Thin peace, in any case, better than a good litter, and especially war. It is not very prudent to call for the destruction of a country that is actually a regional nuclear superpower.
                  Quote: wazza
                  As for the USSR, they may have made a mistake ...

                  Well, yes, regarding Israel they were not mistaken, but they were mistaken about the USSR. Double standards, is not it?
                  Quote: wazza
                  but, with its anti-religious propaganda, did it not only slightly harm the cause of Soviet-Iranian friendship?

                  There was never a special friendship, there was cooperation, which was reduced to a minimum after the overthrow of the Shah. The USSR during the Iran-Iraq war as the United States actively supported Saddam Hussein.
                  1. +1
                    5 July 2017 07: 13
                    Iranian attempts did not seem to be? Iran also prudently wants to become one. Like Pakistan, Taiwan, India, North Korea and others.
                    No, I don’t find it. Have the right to their standards.
                    Well, there was no cessation of this atheistic propaganda. After the overthrow of the Iranians by the Iranian United States, the Iranian Shah in the USSR breathed a sigh of relief. Most Americans by the way believe that the USSR participated in this, almost like a year before in Afghanistan.
              2. +1
                5 July 2017 06: 46
                In the case of the United States, any Muslim is required to look at the dollar, not on TV, in order to not take it.
                In the case of Israel, they offend Muslims and constantly threaten to demolish Al-Aqsa, this is not the case with the Iranians because they don’t have their main shrine, which the Palestinians have nearby, with their selected lands and houses.
          2. +3
            5 July 2017 09: 59
            Quote: Bongo
            Strangely the military is often larger than pacifists than politicians and couch fighters.

            here I completely agree with you, looking at our famous Israeli military people become unrecognizable citizens, for example, both Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak and Natanyahu are not the same hawk, the Soviet Union was more pragmatic in terms of transmission of missile technology and North Korea and Iran, as always friends of the Arabs.
            1. +5
              5 July 2017 10: 06
              Quote: igor67
              here I completely agree with you, looking at our famous Israeli military people become unrecognizable citizens, for example, both Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak and Natanyahu are not the same hawk

              Fighting on a sofa over a computer keyboard is much easier than kneading dirt in a field, smelling a burnt of artillery shots and the exhaust of military vehicles. In addition, the military really represent the destructive power of modern weapons.
              Quote: igor67
              The Soviet Union was more pragmatic in terms of missile technology transfer to North Korea and Iran, as are Arabs' friends as always.

              The USSR never really delivered modern weapons to Iran, and the “friendship” with the Arabs was dictated by the ideological confrontation with the United States. Although with such "allies as Arabs, there are more smut.
              1. +2
                5 July 2017 11: 21
                Quote: Bongo
                Fighting on a sofa over a computer keyboard is much easier than kneading dirt in a field, smelling a burnt of artillery shots and the exhaust of military vehicles. In addition, the military really represent the destructive power of modern weapons.

                all my (combat) experience this month under the bombardment of Grad rockets in 2006, then there was no LCD, the first days are very scary, especially the first day this fear shrinks the throat of tears, and only hissing above your head and an explosion. rushing Fast with the wounded, then of course they took it well on their chests and eventually get used to it, the hardest thing was to break the habit after the armistice, you look at the sky, but nothing flies,
  10. +2
    4 July 2017 23: 01
    Quote: Ilja2016
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Thanks for the nice review.
    Persians are a very intelligent people. With brains.
    As they say, their energy would be, but for peaceful purposes ...
    But I am sure that when the current misunderstanding with the Ayatollah state ends, Iran will become a developed and rich country. fellow

    Here it is necessary to say something disgusting. So rushing hatred of Iran. Watch out for the language. Totally insolent. No conscience?

    If you do not own the information, then do not insult someone .....
    By the way, today on July 4, the Court in Canada upheld the decision to recover from the Iranian government $ 1,7 billion in favor of American citizens whose loved ones died in the attacks carried out by Iran and their satellite terrorists Hisbollah and Hamaom.
    Terrorist attacks were carried out in Lebanon, Argentina, Saudi Arabia and Israel .....
    Directly in Argentina, in the bombing of a building in Buenos Aires in 1994. where 85 people died ... 300 were injured, the prosecutor's office of Argentina accused the former Iranian President Ali Rafsajani, Defense Minister Ahmad Wahidi and the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps Mohsen Rezai .....
    As part of the investigation, Interpol issued 5 arrest warrants; all five wanted criminals are Iranians.
    1. +4
      5 July 2017 05: 34
      Oh you, they also tried to hang on them 9/11. And for the Iran Air 655 brought down in revenge for the shame with the embassy and the nationalization of Iranian oil production, this Kadnad court did not take anything like that?
  11. +3
    5 July 2017 06: 46
    Sergei! Thank. Very interesting stuff. I learned a lot of new things.
    1. +3
      5 July 2017 06: 51
      Quote: Amurets
      Sergei! Thank. Very interesting stuff. I learned a lot of new things.

      Nikolai, good afternoon!
      Seryozha on duty. If he answers, only from the phone. It is a pity, of course, that many have an ideology ahead of common sense. Seryozha tried so hard to avoid "sracha" and selected very streamlined formulations. But apparently it did not help ... request
      1. +3
        5 July 2017 07: 05
        Quote: zyablik.olga
        It is a pity, of course, that for many, ideology is ahead of common sense. Seryozha already tried to avoid “srach” and selected very streamlined formulations. But apparently it didn’t help ...

        Good afternoon, Olya. I can see it already in the comments. But in general, I was struck by the fact that both Koreans and Iranians, not having the exact equipment, were successful in creating (copying) our missiles. It is exact that nobody supplied them with precision machines and accessories for the production of guidance systems. A purely technical, very interesting article.
        1. +3
          7 July 2017 15: 04
          Olga, Sergey, welcome hi Thanks to everyone, great article, interesting comments.
          Nicholas hi
          1. +3
            7 July 2017 15: 53
            Quote: EvgNik
            Olya, Sergey, I welcome hi Thank you all, great article, interesting comments.

            Eugene, thanks for the kind words! Hi from you, too!
            1. +1
              8 July 2017 05: 24
              Sergey, I go in, read, only comments are extremely rare now.
  12. +1
    5 July 2017 10: 14
    Despite the written posts about his mullocracy, Iran has a very developed medicine. Former Soviet cadres of Armenia, Az-na and Georgia cannot be compared. Even I would say their medicine is more developed than in Turkey.
    Despite the presence in Baku of Soviet cadres of Turkish eminent cadres, many go to Iran.
    For example, in our yard there was a girl who fell from a swing and broke her pelvis in many places very badly.
    Here in Baku, a careless attitude complicated the situation. They brought to Turkey and answered anyway, the girl will be limp, nothing can be done too late.
    As the last option they decided to take to Iran on the advice of another neighbor. All in the courtyard the girl’s fate was not indifferent. They were very sorry for everyone, they took her there, the Iranian doctors put her on her feet, she’s not getting lame now. She’ll get married soon. And there are a lot of such stories when Europe could not help turned to Iran.
    In Az, they are not worried that citizens go there for treatment so often. And yes, this factor also decides a reasonable price. In Az, some resources write custom articles against Iranian medicine.
    The problem of Iran is its excessive mullocracy, many Iranians go on vacation to Baku to relax, so to speak, from any bans.
  13. +3
    5 July 2017 10: 16
    Thanks for the article, I was very interested in Iran’s missile potential.
  14. +4
    6 July 2017 13: 55
    Quote: Amurets
    Quote: zyablik.olga
    It is a pity, of course, that for many, ideology is ahead of common sense. Seryozha already tried to avoid “srach” and selected very streamlined formulations. But apparently it didn’t help ...

    Good afternoon, Olya. I can see it already in the comments. But in general, I was struck by the fact that both Koreans and Iranians, not having the exact equipment, were successful in creating (copying) our missiles. It is exact that nobody supplied them with precision machines and accessories for the production of guidance systems. A purely technical, very interesting article.

    There is such a term - reengineering. This is when the product is taken, disassembled to a screw and copied 100%. As for the achievements - they are indisputable. Moreover, under UN sanctions, it was forbidden to supply systems that had an EMNIP accuracy of 0,1% of the range. Nevertheless, improved the performance of the CVO