Military Review

Migration policy will destroy the European Union

35
22-23 June in Brussels, the next EU summit. Representatives of European countries discussed the most important issues for them. On the agenda, of course, were present and Brexit, and the extension of sanctions against the Russian Federation, and the migration situation in Europe. The problems of migration in the European Union over the past few years have not been resolved. Moreover, European states are not even able to work out a general policy on migration. Brussels puts pressure on the countries of Eastern Europe, demanding from them the placement of an increasing number of migrants, the Eastern European states are stubbornly resisting this.


Migration policy will destroy the European Union


The very idea of ​​accommodating countless migrants arriving in Europe from Asian and African countries belonged to the leadership of the European Union, which has long adhered to complete indifference towards the needs and aspirations of citizens of European countries. It is known that most migrants tend to Germany or the Scandinavian countries. But the authorities of the rich Western European countries require that the “junior partners” - the countries of Eastern Europe - also place the migrants. The most “tasty” from this point of view object is a large Poland. Brussels leaves no hope for the Czech Republic and Hungary as the most prosperous, along with Poland, Eastern European states. Why Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary? Yes, because Romania, Macedonia or, for example, Latvia themselves do not represent any interest for migrants, it is almost impossible to make migrants stay in these poor states.

In turn, Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary take a sharply negative attitude towards the accommodation of migrants. All these countries still remain national states and retain this concept. In the accommodation of migrants, they see not only numerous social and economic problems, but also a threat to national identity. Therefore, Warsaw, Prague and Budapest are trying in every way to evade the instructions of the European Union to accommodate migrants. In the end, Brussels was even forced to threaten Eastern European countries with sanctions if they did not begin to “comply with the standard” on the accommodation of migrants.

The main burden of receiving refugees arriving from Turkey and from the coast of North Africa, while falls on Italy and Greece. These countries are forced to "process" multimillion-dollar flows of migrants. Africans and Asians are kept in special camps, “fished” by coast guard boats from wrecked ships and small boats. But migration flows do not stop. The words of the Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi that Europe is waiting for a real invasion from Africa can already be considered a fulfilled prophecy. But both Italy and Greece cannot endlessly “keep the front lines” by accommodating illegal migrants. The Italian authorities have long been trying to revise the famous Dublin Agreement, according to which the first EU country to which the migrant arrived, should assume the main responsibilities for its reception and accommodation. Most of the migrants get to Europe through Italy and Greece. Already, Italy literally groans from migrants, and migration flows do not stop.

For example, on the night of 26 June 2017, an impressive group of 400 people - people from South Sudan - tried to break through from Italy across the border into neighboring France. The French authorities were forced to send a gendarme division with a helicopter to the border. Together with the Italian Carabinieri, the French gendarmes managed to disperse the South Sudanese migrants with tear gas. This is quite a common occurrence for the Italian-French border. In Liguria, not far from the famous Cote d'Azur, the favorite vacation spot of the rich from all over the world, several large tent camps of migrants from African countries are concentrated - South Sudan, Eritrea, Somalia, Libya. Periodically, migrants make attempts to break through to France, some still manage to do this.



By the way, there are more and more migrants arriving in Italy. A comparison of similar figures for 2016 and 2017 of the year shows that in 2017, more immigrants from African countries arrived in the Apennines at 20% than in the first half of 2016. And if in the 2016 year they talked about the “peak of migration” and record figures compared to 2015, then now it’s time to talk about “super pick-up” and super-records. Unhappy Italy has not yet seen such an influx of migrants. Migrants themselves in Italy are not in a hurry to stay, and rush on - to France and Germany. They have heard about generous social benefits and permissiveness. It seems that migration to Europe is becoming the most common life strategy for young and not very Africans, and to a lesser extent for residents of the Near and Middle East.

Rome and Athens are trying to appeal to Brussels, and the leadership of the European Union - to the first persons of Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and other Eastern European states. Eastern Europe is accused of lack of European solidarity and inattention to the problems of Western Europe, which takes the brunt of migration flows. The European Commission has even launched a corresponding investigation in relation to Eastern European states that refuse to accommodate migrants. It turned out that over the past two years, which have become the most strained for the influx of migrants, Poland and Hungary have not placed a single migrant on their territory. The Czech Republic has placed only twelve people, and Slovakia - sixteen people. Of course, these are very small numbers compared to the norms that the European Union tried to impose on the Eastern European states. In Brussels, they expected that Poland would receive at least seven thousand migrants, and the Czech Republic and Hungary - for 1,6 and 1,3 - for a thousand migrants, respectively. Quotas for accommodation of migrants were set even for the poor by the European standards of the Baltic countries, however, they are in no hurry to follow the Brussels instructions.

French President Emmanuel Macron, on the eve of the forum, said that the problem of migration is common to Europe. But in Eastern Europe they do not think so. Poland or the Czech Republic did not colonize African territories, did not wage wars of conquest in the Middle East or North Africa, did not trade in black slaves, and did not pump natural resources from Africa and Asia. Therefore, they, of course, do not understand why the migration problem of France or Italy is suddenly their own problem. Moreover, the economic situation of the countries of Eastern Europe is much worse than their western neighbors. However, the leadership of the European Union does not take all these arguments into account. Before the summit, Brussels turned to frank blackmail, promising sanctions and impressive fines for Eastern European countries refusing to accommodate migrants. Also, the European Union threatens to deprive Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary of the right to vote at meetings of the Council of the European Union.

However, there is another aspect - the migrants themselves do not want to settle in Poland or the Czech Republic, in Hungary or, especially, in the Baltic countries. Even if Eastern European states give the go-ahead to accommodate migrants in their territories and try to comply with all EU regulations, the migrants themselves will look for any opportunity to move from Poland to Scandinavia or from Hungary to Germany. This can be explained - social support in the countries of Eastern Europe is much less developed than in Western Europe. As for jobs (although most African-Asian migrants are not eager to work), in Eastern Europe there is unemployment even for its citizens. Polish, Romanian, Latvian and Lithuanian citizens have long been “driving around” in Western Europe in search of work, they themselves are migrant workers. In the Baltic countries, it is impossible to find work for African-Asian migrants at all, but there are no means to pay them social benefits along the lines of Western European countries.



The leaders of the countries of Eastern Europe, in turn, are convinced that even penalties from the European Union are better than accommodating many thousands of Afro-Asian migrants in the territory of their states. Some Eastern European politicians even call for secession from the European Union. For example, former Czech President Vaclav Klaus called the exit from the European Union in this situation the only way to save the Czech national state. It has long been known for its resolute attitude towards the migration policy of the European Union and Miloš Zeman - the current head of the Czech state, who has repeatedly spoken out against the "open door policy" for African-Asian migrants.

The Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who demands German Chancellor Angela Merkel not to interfere with Hungary in the election campaign in Germany and does not try to solve intra-German problems at the expense of the Hungarian state, is very harshly criticizing the policy of the European Union. It is noteworthy that from many Germans the policy of Orban meets with approval and respect - the Hungarian Prime Minister gained fame for himself as defender of the genuine national interests of the Hungarian people, unlike the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who had long become one of the most ardent lobbyists of African-Asian migration not only in Germany, but throughout the European Union.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade of Hungary, Peter Siyarto, emphasizes that the very idea of ​​accommodating migrants in European countries is very risky. After all, no one knows what kind of people come to Europe, what can we expect from them. In the context of the growing number of terrorist attacks in European countries, such inattention to migrants from Asia and Africa becomes simply dangerous.
The Polish leadership is convinced that not allowing migrants into the country is the best prevention of terrorism and extremism. Representatives of Warsaw even declare that they are learning from the mistakes of other European countries, obviously meaning France, Germany, Great Britain, Belgium, where in the last two years a large number of terrorist acts have occurred with numerous human victims. The spokesman for the Polish government, Rafal Bochenek, even said that every decision on the placement of migrants in European countries stimulated thousands of other migrants to arrive in Europe.

Poland’s position on migration flows is very categorical. In Warsaw, they believe that not only Poland but also the entire European Union should be protected from migrants. To do this, it is necessary to review all the fundamentals of the migration policy of a united Europe and to attend to the issues of protection against illegal migration. Polish Interior Minister Mariusz Blaszczak believes that the multiculturalist policies professed by the European Union are bringing “bad results.”

Another justification for its position on migrants from the Warsaw side is that Poland has received a large number of migrants from neighboring Ukraine over the past three years, from 2014 to 2017. According to official data, there are about XNUMX million Ukrainian citizens in Poland. That is, Poland is also involved in solving the migration problem of the European Union, only being its "shield" not from the south - from African migrants, but from the east - from migrants from Ukraine. But the leadership of the European Union does not care about this circumstance. Most likely, the reason is the greater "convenience" of Ukrainian migrants compared to immigrants from states like Eritrea, South Sudan, Somalia, Libya, Afghanistan or Syria. However, not all political and public figures are satisfied with Ukrainian migrants in Poland, especially considering the specifics historical relations between Poles and Ukrainian nationalists, including during the Second World War.

Until recently, the countries of Eastern Europe in the European Union are trying to remain the last bastions of European values ​​- Christian civilization, reasonable conservatism, preservation of national identity. It seems that if Europe is ever waiting for a new wave of spiritual and ideological revival, it may come from Eastern European states. Despite their economic dependence on Western Europe, to the last they are trying to resist the imposition of those values, which for some reason nowadays have been called “European” (although they are actually the values ​​of cosmopolitan liberal and left-liberal circles that are not related to genuine European culture) . However, given the serious economic gulf between the West and the East of Europe, forecasts can be very unfavorable for Eastern European countries. If in France and Germany, the main “heavyweights” of European politics, in the foreseeable future, nationally oriented forces will not win, then Eastern Europe will also have hard times.

The last EU summit only confirmed the most important trend of recent years - the deepening of internal contradictions in this supranational organization and the further development of the confrontation between Western Europe and Eastern Europe on the migration issue. In the very near future, Eastern European leaders will have to decide what is more important for them and their states - their own development, the preservation of national and cultural identity, or the fulfillment of “common European obligations”, which are in fact blackmailing Brussels and the “heavyweights” of European politics.
Author:
Photos used:
http://surfingbird.ru
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Teberii
    Teberii 29 June 2017 05: 53
    +2
    Unification only under the idea of ​​"one Europe, one economy." It led to the creation of an incomprehensible organization in Brussels, which, as it seems, lives on its own. Naturally, many countries share their sovereignty, to the detriment of national priorities. In this case, the EU will face a long and painful death, which could lead to a "civil war" when the imperial countries of Germany and France do not want to just let go of their feeders.
    1. 210ox
      210ox 29 June 2017 06: 06
      +1
      Yes, okay. He will die so die! He will bury someone .. crying
      1. xetai9977
        xetai9977 29 June 2017 07: 39
        +2
        I do not understand and will never understand why the Europeans took to the maintenance of lazy and arrogant blacks and various trash ?! All right, if they accept refugees from those countries where there are wars. But in this case, let women and children be accepted, and men returned back. There is nothing to feed the deserters!
        1. 34 region
          34 region 29 June 2017 08: 00
          +2
          07.39. Ksetai! Why content? The initial soap was probably to take low-paid workers. This is the principle of capitalism, optimize salary costs and increase howl profit. Such a desire to warm yourself in the cold after pissing yourself. It was warm at first. And what are the grievances now? We also have capitalism and there are similar desires. Echelons to Moscow go regularly. And how do we differ from the EU? The Union developed the periphery. Today the center is being developed. The problem is pre-programmed. What prevents the EU from developing refugee and migrant countries? Develop those countries, you see, and there will be fewer migrants in the EU. And when migrant countries were bombed, what did you think? They kill each other in a burnt house ?! And the migrants turned out to be more cunning and came to the arsonists. Do not want to work, but want to receive benefits? And they want it right. Did they want you to bomb them? And now what to moan and consider yourself a victim? hi
          1. 210ox
            210ox 29 June 2017 08: 46
            0
            By the way. And how many of these "refugees" work? They are all sitting on benefits!
            Quote: 34 region
            07.39. Ksetai! Why content? The initial soap was probably to take low-paid workers. This is the principle of capitalism, optimize salary costs and increase howl profit. Such a desire to warm yourself in the cold after pissing yourself. It was warm at first. And what are the grievances now? We also have capitalism and there are similar desires. Echelons to Moscow go regularly. And how do we differ from the EU? The Union developed the periphery. Today the center is being developed. The problem is pre-programmed. What prevents the EU from developing refugee and migrant countries? Develop those countries, you see, and there will be fewer migrants in the EU. And when migrant countries were bombed, what did you think? They kill each other in a burnt house ?! And the migrants turned out to be more cunning and came to the arsonists. Do not want to work, but want to receive benefits? And they want it right. Did they want you to bomb them? And now what to moan and consider yourself a victim? hi
            1. Bumble
              Bumble 29 June 2017 22: 41
              0
              A very small percentage of migrants work. In UK employment centers, for example, there are a lot of vacancies for low-skilled workers, but you have to work there !!! At the very beginning of the whole mess, I read about such a case: the BMW company recruited about 50 migrant workers to its factories, to the most simple operations on a conveyor, to where no qualifications are needed at all, only physical labor and a minimum of brains. On the second day, none of the migrants came to work. Conception? Merkel will pay the allowance and so, and if not enough then you can steal ...
          2. art030765
            art030765 29 June 2017 13: 02
            0
            a reasonable thought in your reasoning is to develop countries from which there is a flow of migrants - this will be the main task of the eu in the 21st century and they will start it. with regard to the problem of migrants, this problem is overblown in Russia in heaven; in fact, this problem is being solved, and quite successfully in some EU countries there is a catastrophic shortage of workers. moreover, beggars in the EU cannot get a lot of money to transport. and last, when we talk about the current problems of the West, we forget that there politicians come to power in conditions of fierce competition. competition always pushes the best to the top and these people find competent solutions. they cannot run processes in Russia there, they need results, for this reason there is strong demand from politicians.
            1. Serhiodjan
              Serhiodjan 29 June 2017 23: 30
              0
              Ahhh, this is nonsense especially about politicians pleased !!! Politicians in Paris deliberately populate areas with migrant students to vote for sociolists! An effective solution, don’t you find it?))) Immediately noticeable people who have not been to Europe and their wise judgments seem just nonsense of a 15-year-old
        2. 32363
          32363 29 June 2017 18: 33
          +1
          Quote: xetai9977
          I do not understand and will never understand why the Europeans took to the maintenance of lazy and arrogant blacks and various trash ?!

          google "Kalergi Plan" get answers (if interested).
          and also this activist can be studied.


          Everything goes according to Kalergi's plan.

          merkelin even awarded the kalergi medal


      2. vlad_vlad
        vlad_vlad 29 June 2017 17: 42
        0
        210Stock Today, 06: 06 ↑
        Oh well. Dies so dies!


        how many people here sincerely worry about us!

        I want to reassure everyone - we have everything the way. and who is not with us (like the British, Poles, Czechs, etc.) - so no problem !! then piss off!
        but the trouble is - then the money from the European fund will not come to raise the economy ... and there is no access to the market ...
        but eta garbage. but pride - full pants.

        there the Greeks 2 years ago were showing off so much that the temperature rose on the TV. and now?
        1. 32363
          32363 29 June 2017 18: 24
          +1
          Quote: vlad_vlad

          I want to reassure everyone - we have everything the way. and who is not with us

          where the way you live behind the fence chtoli?
          they turned the country into a garbage dump, they collected and feed them from all the asses of the earth
    2. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 29 June 2017 06: 18
      +2
      Europe is destroying itself. Too many other southern nations, they are more aggressive, more active than the indigenous people! They do not want to comply with European laws, to work, serving the whites !!!!! I do not think that the countries of Eastern Europe will be able to resist for a long time.
    3. Kenxnumx
      Kenxnumx 29 June 2017 07: 31
      +3
      Predicting the death of the EU in second place after the same forecasts for Ukraine. Wildly sorry, but were you there you yourself saw this?
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 29 June 2017 11: 32
      +1
      Well, there will be a Negro Union, and what difference does it make for Europe if they are called Euro-Africans? laughing
  2. Olgovich
    Olgovich 29 June 2017 06: 01
    +1
    In 30-40 years, non-French, non-Germans, non-English in the respective countries will become more than half the population. This is the end of Europe.
    Of course, she herself is to blame, but this joy doesn’t cause .......
    If only the Angles and the French managed to eliminate nuclear weapons ....
    1. venaya
      venaya 29 June 2017 07: 14
      +1
      Quote: Olgovich
      In 30-40 years, non-French, non-Germans, non-English in the respective countries will become more than half of the population. This is the end of Europe

      Well, why is the end? If some part of the ancient continent of Asia (now it is called the stupid mixed term Eurasia) was called "Europe", a word from Aramaic languages, then in this case representatives of the peoples who actually use these very languages ​​of the Aramaic language group will live there. Here everything turns out strictly according to popular wisdom: "As you call a ship (part of the continent), so it will sail." So I think that actually there is nothing to be surprised at, everything is quite logical and logical.
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid 29 June 2017 07: 40
        +1
        I have the gloating about the secondary position of the countries of eastern Europe and the Baltic states because of Russophobia, screams of Soviet occupation, the destruction of monuments and everything else.
  3. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 29 June 2017 06: 27
    +2
    Migrants ... Oh, this notorious tolerance, which does not allow us to directly name parasites and loafers who rushed to Europe for free social benefits. This crowd is not going to assimilate and work, respect the laws of their host country. They establish their laws, the main of which is, give me, you owe us. And the more such "migrants" Europe shelter, the sooner it will cease to exist. But what it will turn into and what we will have to deal with later is a big question.
  4. Kenxnumx
    Kenxnumx 29 June 2017 07: 27
    +8
    In St. Petersburg, 200 thousand are only Uzbeks. There are more than 10 million migrants in Russia. Do we regret Europe.
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 29 June 2017 07: 45
      +1
      Visitors work for us. And they do not receive any migrant benefits, the state does not provide any housing, (unlike Europe), they themselves or employers. SO these are two big differences. !!!!!
      1. Kenxnumx
        Kenxnumx 29 June 2017 11: 50
        0
        And you probably think that they all have benefits in Europe and do not work. If they said so at RenTV, then this is not necessarily true. Registered lucky people who are at risk of deportation do not work unless they prove that something threatened them at home
        The rest receive crumbs from volunteers of organizations or work for pennies without registration.
        1. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid 29 June 2017 13: 06
          0
          About the fact that they work for a penny ----- I do not know. I know about canteens, about housing from the city. Whatever it is ----- warm and the roof over your head is free. We have a fee for housing, not a small one. for them. This is 100%.
          True, when I used to watch NTV a year ago, what crowds they go, sweeping everything on the way — you can only compare with locusts.
    2. Black5Raven
      Black5Raven 29 June 2017 15: 31
      +1
      And Russia does not have measures to counteract illegal immigrants, but the Second keeps it! place after the USA in illegal immigrants. And apparently not planned.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 29 June 2017 07: 47
    +2
    While the EU is engaged in internal disassembly to whom and how many refugees to accept, the split is growing. For some reason, Europe is not at all sorry. European politicians have long had to say "thank you very much" to Merkel, who opened the European gates. But tolerance, fictional multiculture prevailed over the snickering politicians of old Europe, who for the sake of mythical “values” are Gogt's sacrifices to their people. "To each according to his deeds."
    1. Goodmen
      Goodmen 29 June 2017 15: 47
      0
      Quote: rotmistr60
      But tolerance, fictional multiculture prevailed over the snickering politicians of old Europe, who for the sake of mythical “values” are Gogt's sacrifices to their people. "To each according to his deeds."


      We have the same thing going on. We change in your quote "old Europe" to "RF" and boldly apply to our country ....
      But I do not want, because of the “affairs” of agents of influence in our power and near-power structures, “to be paid” to the entire population of the country!
  6. Altona
    Altona 29 June 2017 11: 25
    +2
    Quote: Region 34
    We also have capitalism and there are similar desires. Echelons to Moscow go regularly. And how do we differ from the EU? The Union developed the periphery. Today the center is being developed. The problem is pre-programmed.

    -----------------------------------
    What is hindering the restoration of cooperative chains for cotton with Uzbeks and for food with Tajiks now? Only the ostentatious great-power "patriotism" of the "elite" (top echelon managers), when they poke national money and then take it to London, and pour it into our ears about the "greatness of Russia."
  7. Altona
    Altona 29 June 2017 11: 27
    +5
    Quote: Reptiloid
    Visitors work for us. And do not receive any migrant benefits, the state does not provide any housing

    --------------------------
    How to say? The women are going to give birth to them, they themselves receive Russian passports at the "consulates" and they have everything, not a migrant, but a Great Russian citizen. And not all visitors work, some trains in St. Petersburg are blown up.
  8. Altona
    Altona 29 June 2017 11: 28
    +4
    Quote: Reptiloid
    I have the gloating about the secondary position of the countries of eastern Europe and the Baltic states because of Russophobia, screams of Soviet occupation, the destruction of monuments and everything else.

    -----------------------
    I always said: "If you felt bad with the Russians, then it will be just fine with the Negroes and Arabs!"
    1. Kenxnumx
      Kenxnumx 29 June 2017 13: 37
      +2
      By the way, yes. In the same Austria, the Slavs are under much greater pressure than any Turks and Arabs. Despite the fact that the Slavs fully work and Blacks do not really like this thing.
  9. Brushing
    Brushing 29 June 2017 12: 50
    +3
    Quote: Ken71
    In St. Petersburg, 200 thousand are only Uzbeks. There are more than 10 million migrants in Russia. Do we regret Europe.


    Gyyyyyyyy .... laughing

    And in Moscow, this is probably even more, and throughout Russia, where you can’t spit it — migrants are like dirt .... in places the Russian face is not visible .... hi
  10. alatanas
    alatanas 29 June 2017 13: 34
    0
    Romania, Macedonia or, for example, Latvia themselves are of no interest to migrants

    FYR Macedonia is not a member of the EU.
  11. Goodmen
    Goodmen 29 June 2017 14: 52
    0
    It seems that in the West the fashion for everything is foreign. To fanaticism is simple !!! Starting from values ​​that are foreign to 99, (9)% of people (that is, in combination with a worldview as conceived by the Creator), continuing to large-scale population of their lands with completely alien, foreign bodies, and ending with foreign objects that local "elites" stuff in the ass.

    Interestingly, is such progressive heterophilia treated? It seems to me that only lead ...
  12. fsps
    fsps 29 June 2017 18: 17
    0
    There is another point that is not written about:
    http://seva-riga.livejournal.com/861779.html
    Europe is the cancer, islam is the answer
    and a new drang nah ost. Then Bander opened a niche in the labor market: by mercenaries to shoot migrants in Europe, if unarmed, of course. They are familiar.
  13. 32363
    32363 29 June 2017 23: 35
    +1
    that’s the whole point from 6.50 min ...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuYtgbWJoAw
  14. mac789
    mac789 30 June 2017 14: 18
    0
    On the one hand, Poland is a clear under-state. Those. the territory is formally considered a state, but almost constantly controlled from the outside. The Germans rule them, then the French, then Russians, then Americans.
    On the other hand, this under-state has serious military capabilities. There are more than a thousand tanks, and these are not fat-bellied Abrams (who can only be entrusted with the role of submarines in Mazovian bolts), but Soviet models specially created for military operations in Eastern Europe. And the pscheks regularly upgrade them.
    Plus some sort of aviation (modern Syrian). Plus there is no fleet, but there is one. Maybe they don’t know how to fight, but you won’t be denied a certain dashingness (what was the name of the Polish commander whom Suvorov chasing after him sent a personal, expensive snuffbox as a sign of respect). Plus tactical nuclear weapons, the Americans will throw them. Just as they threw him to the Germans. Plus, their mobilization potential is more than a million people.
    So you can’t underestimate them, and the reaction to any sharp movements should be extremely harsh.