Russian Foreign Ministry: Moscow has developed a roadmap for Pyongyang

28
Moscow has developed a roadmap to solve the problem of the Korean Peninsula and is ready to discuss it with partners, said RIA News Deputy Foreign Minister Igor Morgulov.

We have developed and are ready to discuss with partners a set of practical measures, a kind of road map, the ultimate goal of which is to create a lasting peace mechanism in Northeast Asia while simultaneously solving the problems of the peninsula, including its denuclearization
- declared Morgulov. According to him, Moscow, promoting such an initiative, acts in coordination with Chinese partners concerned about what is happening in the region.



Russian Foreign Ministry: Moscow has developed a "road map" for Pyongyang


The document includes a phased scheme of moving the parties towards a dialogue without preliminary conditions, said the deputy foreign minister. It is proposed to begin with "manifestation of mutual restraint, non-provocation of each other, negotiations on common principles of mutual relations, such as non-aggression, refusal to use and the threat of force." At the same time, Pyongyang should be provided with security guarantees, which will enable it to further abandon the nuclear missile program, Morgulov stressed.

The diplomat drew attention to the fact that the problems of the peninsula should be resolved peacefully, primarily through the dialogue of the main antagonists - the United States and the DPRK. These countries are formally in a state of war, since after the 1950-1953 conflict, only an armistice agreement was signed between them. All subsequent attempts by Pyongyang to conclude a treaty of peace in the United States were rejected. Recently, military tensions between countries have further aggravated against the background of nuclear and missile tests of the DPRK. Washington recently sent the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Carl Vinson to the Sea of ​​Japan to intimidate Pyongyang, and then the repair of another aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan was completed in the Japanese port of Yokosuka. Russia is convinced that military provocations and saber-rattling weapons only aggravate the situation on the Korean Peninsula.

The deputy head of the Russian Foreign Ministry noted that Moscow opposes a broad interpretation of the regime and the "introduction by certain states of unilateral restrictions aimed, in essence, at the economic" strangulation of the "DPRK".
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    27 June 2017 11: 57
    At the same time, Pyongyang must be provided with security guarantees, which will allow him to abandon the nuclear missile program in the future
    Yes, one has already refused, and where is he now? request
    1. +21
      27 June 2017 12: 07
      Quote: pjastolov
      At the same time, Pyongyang must be provided with security guarantees, which will allow him to abandon the nuclear missile program in the future
      Yes, one has already refused, and where is he now? request

      Are you talking about Sadam?
      Do not care for Americans. When it is beneficial for them — they conclude, then go out, unilaterally. They have only one guarantee: the inevitability of a retaliatory strike!
      1. +1
        27 June 2017 12: 25
        "roadmap" ... coined the terms, a lot of people are busy developing, get paid, everyone is happy, but what's the point? when were our plans mattresses and their pocket un accepted?
        1. +3
          27 June 2017 12: 38
          Moscow has developed a roadmap for Pyongyang

          Useless.
          Peace can only be achieved where BOTH parties strive for peace. And here NONE of the parties seeks peace.
          They pressed on the northerners for too long. They don’t trust the Americans for nothing. And rightly so, they will deceive right away when they can. The northerners know that they will kill them as soon as they can
          Southerners are a puppet of Americans, Americans need a zone of tension.
    2. +5
      27 June 2017 12: 07
      Quote: pjastolov
      Yes, one has already refused, and where is he now?

      Striped ones do not attack those who have nuclear weapons. The whole world knows this. You need to be an idiot to give up nuclear weapons. As soon as they refuse they will immediately be swept off the face of the earth ..
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +7
        27 June 2017 12: 23
        and ours, or do you need to unfreeze your personal savings?
    3. +1
      27 June 2017 12: 08
      For Pyongyang, such a roadmap is equivalent to sending Un along a well-known walking route. laughing Another thing is if he asks about it.
      1. +2
        27 June 2017 12: 48
        This Eun is the only Great Leader on our planet born over the past 65 years ... At the moment, there is no leader on earth equal to him.
        His dad was a symbol, a sort of English queen without power, others ruled for him ...
        Kim Jong-un completely took power into his own hands and began economic reforms, moreover, in a situation of absolute blockade and long-term sanctions. Any country in such a situation would cease to exist in 5 years, and under these conditions, it will also boost the economy and production. Naturally, all the neighboring countries hate him, as they hated Peter the Great, Stalin, Putin ...
        Why can’t Putin be called a great leader? Yes, he brought the country out of a complete asshole, saved from a split, but for 20 years he still has not been able to take power into his own hands ... he is always looking for compromise solutions, where he needs to show strength and firmness he goes aside ...
        When our country came under sanctions, he, as a leader vested with the full confidence of the people, had to hold a referendum and take power into his own hands, change the current colonial constitution to an independent one, abolish the corrupt council and take complete control of the Central Bank. This would make it possible to invest money not in NATO’s military budget, but in rebuilding its economy, in building factories, etc.
        Now, according to our constitution, investing in the Russian economy, Russia has no right ...
    4. +1
      27 June 2017 12: 31
      Quote: pjastolov
      Yes, one has already refused, and where is he now?

      Give each country a nuclear weapon. We will live in a fun world
      1. +7
        27 June 2017 12: 34
        We will live in a fun world
        maybe these funkies still calm down then?
        1. +1
          27 June 2017 12: 35
          Quote: pjastolov
          maybe these funkies still calm down then?

          Listen, I won’t even comment on it. Kindergarten
          1. +7
            27 June 2017 12: 37
            don’t comment request
      2. +2
        27 June 2017 12: 39
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Quote: pjastolov
        Yes, one has already refused, and where is he now?

        Give each country a nuclear weapon. We will live in a fun world

        Better selectively Sash! Countries whose nations are proud and not corrupt like North Koreans for example! They themselves created it and have the right to it .. Nobody will touch them anymore and the Romanovs will not starve! (Himself to them in the morning on a boat gum. You will be transporting help ..)))) laughing
    5. 0
      28 June 2017 12: 17
      Here and China, they touch it for eggs)) wang))) - the Americans will rush to the Russian voice acting of the Chinese conditions and ... agree)) Trump got tired of stupidly driving there, the Winsons here)))) ... he is fucked at home, and with Kim complete w ..pa))
  2. 0
    27 June 2017 11: 58
    There is a great word "plan." Well, what are the roadmaps?
  3. +3
    27 June 2017 12: 02
    I believe that the United States in general should not be involved in this process, because the principles of dialogue and mutual respect for the parties are unknown to them. IMHO, China and Russia are able to independently solve the North Korean problem.
    1. +2
      27 June 2017 12: 32
      Everyone understands this, including the United States. But when were they interested in someone's opinion about their actions? They do not need peace anywhere except their own kingdom.
  4. +1
    27 June 2017 12: 05
    They have no roads there laughing (joke)
  5. +2
    27 June 2017 12: 23
    Attempts to drive into the stall of democracy the great UN are doomed to failure ...
    in KREMLIN it would be necessary to look at things more realistically ... to play along with US policy is a manifestation of disrespect for comrade EUN.
    Now he has secretly entered the nuclear club of our planet and it’s risky for his own health to speak with him from the position of a yard punks led by the USA.
    smile Hold on to the great UN ... JUCHE ideas gained material strength in the form of nuclear weapons ... a convincing argument for any aggressor.
    1. +1
      27 June 2017 12: 31
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      in KREMLIN it would be necessary to look at things more realistically ... to play along with US policy is a manifestation of disrespect for comrade EUN.

      Do we have to lick Kim's ass?
      1. +2
        27 June 2017 12: 50
        Do we have to lick Kim's ass?

        belay Alexander what a perversion ... wassat
        KIM has his own girlfriend ...

        I think YONA is a completely independent politician and you need to be able to talk to him without hurting his personality ... of course, many are annoyed by his manner of banging a sneaker on the table ... but take US politicians with his mania of exclusivity ... YN is a playful boy compared to them.
    2. 0
      27 June 2017 12: 36
      Quite right, before you push Eun into a roadmap that goes against the interests of his country, you need to understand what Eun wants and without negotiations it is very difficult to do.
  6. 0
    27 June 2017 12: 43
    It is proposed to start with "manifestations of mutual restraint, non-provocation of each other, negotiations on general principles of relations, such as non-aggression, refusal to use and threats of force"
    In Syria and in Donbas, this is what happens and everything is led by the United States. It’s stupid to negotiate with the USA, they’re the empire, they don’t owe anything to anyone, and they don’t have to keep their word, it’s their tradition that’s nothing personal, and whoever doesn’t understand it is the one who ...
  7. +2
    27 June 2017 12: 47
    Half of the countries participating in this conflict are guilty of economic sanctions against the Russian Federation, why the hell do we again need the laurels of peacekeepers?
    We would conduct joint exercises with the KPA for several weeks, partially get out of sanctions against the DPRK, and then quietly say through Echo-Moscow that we are preparing a “road map” according to the Harvat option (without specifying at the expense of the South Caucasus or the DPRK) , after that, every 5 minutes in Sheremetyevo the planes of the heads of the USA, Japan, South Caucasus and the EU would land, and the leaders of the above states with bulging eyes would wait for an audience with the Russian tsar to find out because of whom it is crowded on Earth ..... .

    Any peace-loving proposals should always be helped by a steel fist in like gloves ....., and in the database again they will laugh at us with a terrible laugh ....
  8. 0
    27 June 2017 14: 27
    For starters, it would not be bad for Russia to develop a "map for the restoration of all that was destroyed" than to tackle other countries. To do this, you need the most necessary, to restore the priority of the worker, and only then "service staff". It’s a pity that everything is on the back!fool
  9. 0
    27 June 2017 14: 37
    If the goal of the negotiations will disarm Pyongyang and its renunciation of nuclear missile weapons, then they may not be launched. Only nuclear missile weapons can beat and there is a guarantee of security against US aggression. The very proposal to the DPRK on the rejection of nuclear missile weapons should be considered as an unfriendly act of arsonists of the war.
    Talks can only be a bit about limiting, within the framework of reasonable sufficiency, the nuclear missile deterrence potential of the DPRK and the non-proliferation of Pyongyang's nuclear weapons to third countries.
  10. +1
    27 June 2017 15: 59
    including him denuclearization

    What a vile, vile, and ugly word!
    The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs should study less in the West and learn its own Russian more without introducing such wild English-language vulgarisms and / or literal tracing-paper from English into official statements.
  11. 0
    27 June 2017 16: 31
    Does Pyongyang know about this map?