Military Review

NATO is comprehensively fighting rearmament of the Russian Federation

32
According to information RIA News, head of the NATO military committee, General Peter Pavel, said the publication Politicalthat the alliance is counteracting an increase in Russia's military potential “at almost every level,” but he is not sure that the Russian Federation has “aggressive intentions” in relation to the military bloc.

We define a threat based on two main components — opportunity and intent. As for opportunities, there is no doubt that Russia is developing its capabilities both in the traditional and in the nuclear component. As for the exercises, the Russian Federation has the ability to deploy troops over long distances and to use effectively away from their own territory. Her growing military prowess is indisputable. As for intentions, they are not clear, because we cannot say for sure that Russia has aggressive intentions regarding NATO.


NATO is comprehensively fighting rearmament of the Russian Federation


He reported on the growth of Russia's military presence. In particular, he unprovenly noted “the deployment of ballistic intercontinental missiles capable of carrying nuclear weapon, in Kaliningrad and Crimea ".

We see a large-scale modernization of the entire Russian army.

- Paul summarized.

32 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Teberii
    Teberii 27 June 2017 05: 24
    +2
    Before answering, you need to decide on this, apparently a problem.
    1. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 27 June 2017 05: 26
      +10
      head of the NATO military committee general Peter Pavel
      "two saints" in one bottle damn ...
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 27 June 2017 05: 30
        +1
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        "two saints" in one bottle damn ...

        there is only one saint in our bottle smile
      2. ImPerts
        ImPerts 27 June 2017 06: 01
        +2
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        "two saints" in one bottle damn ...

        He could be an admiral general. It would be even more fun)))
        1. sgapich
          sgapich 27 June 2017 07: 20
          0
          Quote: ImPerts
          He could be an admiral general. It would be even more fun)))


          This is now he is a four-star general (army general), the previous rank was lieutenant general))
        2. GRF
          GRF 27 June 2017 10: 03
          0
          Binary addition good to good gives poor. This is probably why they say they are not looking for good from good)
      3. 210ox
        210ox 27 June 2017 06: 07
        +1
        Yes, and it would not hurt to shave .. And then it really grows up like Musafail .. As for counteracting rearmament ... Well, in the article it is not entirely clear how ... The murders of our scientists, or terrorist attacks at work? Only unless shock work economic block of government?
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        head of the NATO military committee general Peter Pavel
        "two saints" in one bottle damn ...
      4. Geisenberg
        Geisenberg 27 June 2017 11: 36
        0
        Quote: Andrew Y.
        head of the NATO military committee general Peter Pavel
        "two saints" in one bottle damn ...


        The apostles are kind of like))) Both were hanged according to the unofficial version) ... Karma of a dude is so unenviable))
    2. Geisenberg
      Geisenberg 27 June 2017 11: 34
      0
      Quote: Teberii
      Before answering, you need to decide on this, apparently a problem.


      Not his topic. He just needs to talk, anyway. Even outright nonsense and speculation fit.
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 27 June 2017 05: 27
    +11
    We see a large-scale modernization of the entire Russian army.
    All over the world, armies are modernizing what is extraordinary!
    PS I still don’t understand how to call him - Peter or Paul?
    PSS Just not Petropavlovsk! stop
    1. Cutter
      Cutter 27 June 2017 05: 53
      +8
      They are very worried about it ... No wonder they feel a "bump" at the anus ...
  3. Niccola Mack
    Niccola Mack 27 June 2017 05: 28
    +3
    We define a threat based on two main components - opportunity and intent.

    It is interesting, and what may be the intentions of the state, which has been overlaid with bases on all sides and is actively running with clubs under the windows with the cries of "Russians coming"?
    noted "the deployment of intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear weapons in Kaliningrad and the Crimea."

    And then Ostap suffered fool !!!
    The general is progressing "Svidomo" - you see already picked up somewhere in communication with representatives of the "independent" !!!
    1. RusKosTen
      RusKosTen 27 June 2017 05: 43
      +1
      Quote: Nikkola Mac
      And then Ostap suffered !!!

      Apparently the NATO general meant the Iskanders, who in theory are capable of carrying nuclear warheads
      1. Niccola Mack
        Niccola Mack 27 June 2017 06: 00
        +3
        NATO general meant "Iskander"

        Which side of the Iskanders is “intercontinental”?
        1. RusKosTen
          RusKosTen 27 June 2017 06: 02
          +1
          Maybe for the general the word "intercontinental" turned out to be synonymous with "ballistic" fellow
          1. sabakina
            sabakina 27 June 2017 06: 28
            +6
            In order to place ICBMs inside the enemy’s ring, one must be complete. This general is definitely not bridal?
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 27 June 2017 07: 42
              +1
              Hello, Glory! hi
              We see a large-scale modernization of the entire Russian army.

              And from this they have a constant "bench press". wassat
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 27 June 2017 05: 54
    +1
    And then he received his sight! And how are they "comprehensively fighting the rearmament of the Russian Federation"? Are saboteurs sent to factories? laughing
  5. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 27 June 2017 06: 08
    +3
    The degeneral has an internal struggle - Peter is fighting Paul with him, hence the nonsense that he carries. fool
  6. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 27 June 2017 06: 23
    +3
    Her growing military prowess is undeniable.

    Of course, it’s indisputable, at least in some ways.
    the alliance is opposing the increase in Russia's military potential "at almost every level",

    As I understand it, the levels are development, production and putting into service. It is interesting and how do they react? They steal designers, carry out sabotage at defense industry enterprises, and prohibit putting them into service? The general broke out.
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 27 June 2017 07: 44
      +2
      Gennady, hello! hi
      Quote: rotmistr60
      The general broke out.

      So after all tryndet for the newspaper for the purpose of calming "partners and allies" on the block it is not to carry bags of cement.
      1. rotmistr60
        rotmistr60 27 June 2017 07: 51
        +3
        Pasha, hello! hi To freedom with a clear conscience?
        in order to reassure "partners and allies" in the block

        They so encouraged them (partners) that they now even see the “Russian threat” even in the toilet. Psychotherapists from them are useless, but the provocateurs are good.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 27 June 2017 07: 56
          +2
          Yeah, in a week baths you can not only clear your conscience. wink
          Quote: rotmistr60
          Psychotherapists from them are useless, but the provocateurs are good.

          So you’re used to it, that everyone should take their word for it. So they do not bother either with arguments or with evidence. They said “it is necessary” - the partners trumped and ran to fulfill, jumping on the go from the pants with zeal.
          1. rotmistr60
            rotmistr60 27 June 2017 08: 00
            +2
            They will not gear in front of the United States, there will be no support. All NATO small fry believes that it is protected, but in fact in complete bondage. Yes, and shish with them.
            1. bouncyhunter
              bouncyhunter 27 June 2017 08: 07
              +3
              When these mongrel sing the praises of the United States and NATO, I find it ridiculous: a slave praises his chains and the slave owner.
  7. farik68
    farik68 27 June 2017 06: 32
    +2
    Do you want peace, prepare for war .....
  8. Tolstoevsky
    Tolstoevsky 27 June 2017 06: 58
    +2
    unfinished NATO reptile still spoil our blood
  9. DEPARTMENT
    DEPARTMENT 27 June 2017 07: 17
    +1
    We see a large-scale modernization of the entire Russian army.

    I do not like it when the enemy begins to praise ... So, the adversaries are planning something!
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. askme
    askme 27 June 2017 08: 18
    +1
    What the combat psychologists, psychological war experts wrote to him, he broadcasts. Demonstrates a dominant position in this case (a sign that NATO is losing a psychological war now). Everything else is propaganda ...
  12. afrikanez
    afrikanez 27 June 2017 09: 23
    0
    As for the intentions, they are not clear, because we cannot say for sure that Russia has aggressive intentions regarding NATO.
    For this, we are well aware of the intentions of NATO, the most aggressive on the planet.
  13. Abel
    Abel 28 June 2017 00: 20
    0
    In short: SOS! Russia is modernizing the army and, “give me a diaper,” Russia may be attacking NATO. The logic is iron, in the spirit of NATO. Russia is modernizing the army. But did he want us to stay with the three-rulers and the E-28, T-26, BT-7 tanks? You might think that NATO does not modernize its weapons and does not conduct exercises. As for ballistic missiles is not discussed. How schizophrenic delirium cannot be discussed. On a fig, it is asked, to place BALLISTIC missiles in Kaliningrad and the Crimea? To shoot closer? Nonsense!
    And as for the desire ,,, so Russia is constantly bringing its borders closer to NATO. And we have a historical memory, we remember 1941 and friendly democratic Germany.
  14. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 28 June 2017 10: 36
    0
    You scoundrel, however, but also a Slav, although there are even worse in their actions from the Slavs - Psheks