Military Review

The second launch of the American anti-missile SM-3 Block IIA failed

37
In the United States, tests of the SM-3 Block IIA interceptor missile model failed, the newspaper writes. Defense News. Test run was carried out near the Hawaiian Islands. The destroyer "John Paul Jones", equipped with combat information and control system "Aegis", was able to detect the training target, take on the escort and fire. However, the missile did not hit the target. A medium-range ballistic missile was launched from a US missile range on the island of Kauai, Hawaii.

The second launch of the American anti-missile SM-3 Block IIA failed


These are just the second tests of the new version of SM-3. The first were held in February and ended with a successful interception. According to the creators, the company Raytheon, armed with Block IIA are going to put in 2018 year. It can equip both the ship and the ground launcher. SM-3 will have to destroy ballistic missiles with a range from 3 to 5 thousands of kilometers.

Read more about the SM-3 antimissiles can be found in material "Military Review"
Photos used:
http://news.datanews.ru/
37 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dead duck
    Dead duck 22 June 2017 17: 20
    +11
    Coincidence? .... I do not think so.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 22 June 2017 17: 36
      +2
      I wonder, and if the contract forbids creating rockets and even an engine for medium and short-range missiles, how did they make the target?
      1. GELEZNII_KAPUT
        GELEZNII_KAPUT 22 June 2017 17: 41
        0
        Quote: Muvka
        I wonder, and if the contract forbids creating rockets and even an engine for medium and short-range missiles, how did they make the target?

        Sea based possible.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 22 June 2017 17: 47
          +2
          And what is the name of an American sea-based medium-range ballistic missile?
      2. Dead duck
        Dead duck 22 June 2017 19: 51
        +5
        In targets in a different way, usually special missiles are made and they differ significantly from military ones.
    2. Maz
      Maz 22 June 2017 19: 40
      +1
      I know what to do, one word Israel will save America.
  2. shans2
    shans2 22 June 2017 17: 21
    +9
    The main thing is to quickly escape from the shores of the DPRK from Juche
    1. jonhr
      jonhr 22 June 2017 18: 44
      +1
      do you want such a radiant president? laughing
  3. bk316
    bk316 22 June 2017 17: 24
    +7
    Well, at least it took off ..... It was necessary to put a beacon on the target.
  4. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 22 June 2017 17: 25
    +3
    Kindergarten. Yes, to bring this rocket will require not one or two, several dozen launches. How else?
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 22 June 2017 17: 28
      0
      So these are tests, not development.
      1. CentDo
        CentDo 23 June 2017 15: 21
        +1
        Remember the Mace. What is the ratio of successful and unsuccessful starts?
    2. Kent0001
      Kent0001 22 June 2017 17: 28
      +1
      So yes, they want the current in the 18 year to put it into service.
      1. Aaron Zawi
        Aaron Zawi 22 June 2017 17: 30
        0
        Quote: Kent0001
        So yes, they want the current in the 18 year to put it into service.

        So put in 19. Not a tragedy.
        1. Pirogov
          Pirogov 22 June 2017 17: 34
          +9
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          So put in 19. Not a tragedy.

          How is this not a tragedy? And if Iran attacks you and America and everything is gone ???))))
          1. Orionvit
            Orionvit 22 June 2017 20: 19
            +3
            This is fake men. I saw in the movie that the destroyer "John Paul Jones", the aliens were cut to pieces, exactly near the Hawaiian Islands. laughing Hollywood will not lie. lol
        2. Vasyan1971
          Vasyan1971 22 June 2017 20: 06
          0
          Quote: Aaron Zawi
          Quote: Kent0001
          So yes, they want the current in the 18 year to put it into service.

          So put in 19. Not a tragedy.

          Exactly. If we have a deadline in Armata, PAK FA or some other kind of sword-treasure, then - "everything is gone!", "When you finish it - it will become obsolete!" And here - "Not a tragedy!"
  5. Alexander War
    Alexander War 22 June 2017 17: 33
    +6
    laughingThe launch of an unmatched SM-3 Block IIA missile in the world ended in failure.
  6. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 22 June 2017 17: 34
    +5
    This is just the second test of the new version of SM-3
    Mdya-mdya. As I understand you. Well, another 500 - .... Lyamov "and it will go, and everyone will pick up, and everyone will buy!"
  7. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 22 June 2017 17: 37
    +3
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    Kindergarten.

    Where? Express yourself more specifically, you are our true-loving one, and some here think that the site participants from the promised land are the ultimate truth, do not disappoint them!
  8. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 22 June 2017 17: 40
    +3
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    So put in 19. Not a tragedy

    Yes, no, of course, and 20 is okay and 21 is not critical, it’s only if we have problems that are terrible, darkness and quiet horror, but for the elect it’s normal, right? or how ?
  9. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 22 June 2017 17: 45
    +9
    Yes, you certainly need to throw money in order to fly normally!
    1. corporal
      corporal 22 June 2017 22: 30
      +1
      good I'm taking it to the memoris!
      1. LÄRZ
        LÄRZ 22 June 2017 22: 32
        +3
        Quote: Corporal
        good I'm taking it to the memoris!

        I give it! laughing drinks
  10. Alexander War
    Alexander War 22 June 2017 17: 51
    +3
    Moreover, the developers promised that almost all components of the SM-3 IIA will be original products that are different from other modifications of the SM-3 family. Meanwhile, according to the official schedule of the ABM Agency, this missile should be deployed as part of the Aegis Ashore complex in Poland as early as 2018. Let’s see. This is the emblem of the second SM-3 Block IIA missile test, called the "Star Kirin" 32 mil greens in the toilet
  11. Altona
    Altona 22 June 2017 18: 14
    +1
    It's nice when something falls or explodes overseas. But it’s a trifle. bully
  12. Altona
    Altona 22 June 2017 18: 16
    +1
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    So put in 19. Not a tragedy.

    -----------------------
    Dopilyat, Aron, I'm sure. They will finish off with a sledgehammer, the authorities will be insulted for the hackish leadership, while the Washington regional committee does not sleep. bully
  13. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 22 June 2017 20: 09
    0
    SM-3

    The rocket forms similar to the one from the Buk air defense system.
  14. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 22 June 2017 21: 28
    +2
    The main thing is that the reports are honest. Success - write "success." Miss - write "miss."
    Do not fake the test, the key to success.
  15. Old26
    Old26 23 June 2017 00: 27
    0
    Quote: Muvka
    I wonder, and if the contract forbids creating rockets and even an engine for medium and short-range missiles, how did they make the target?

    Say thanks to Mikhail Sergeyevich and his negotiators, in particular Shevarnadze. It was thanks to them that Article VII arose in the contract.

    These are just the second tests of the new version of SM-3.

    And the men do not even know ...
  16. 72jora72
    72jora72 23 June 2017 02: 54
    0
    Quote: jonhr
    do you want such a radiant president? laughing

    You look at your .....
  17. NUR
    NUR 23 June 2017 05: 18
    0
    50 to 50. This is not gut.
  18. Old26
    Old26 23 June 2017 08: 10
    +1
    Quote: NUR
    50 to 50. This is not gut.

    In fact, the number of trials was 3. Of these, 2 were successful. That is 33 to 66. Of course this is not buzzing.
    You can laugh at the enemy when you have everything on the ointment and there is a system comparable or superior to those that the adversary has. And when we have only plans, and they already have iron - then there is no laughing matter ...
    1. g1washntwn
      g1washntwn 23 June 2017 10: 31
      0
      Americans do not have failures, they are successful and partially successful :)
  19. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 23 June 2017 13: 35
    0
    So it is necessary. There must be a bit of "failure" so that more money is taken and confirms that there is also "good luck". When we have "failures" we are openly reporting about it and when we say that we have time, we can believe.
    The whole eta missile defense is a complete success as a business and profit and bluff like an missile defense.
  20. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 23 June 2017 13: 39
    0
    Quote: shans2
    The main thing is to quickly escape from the shores of the DPRK from Juche

    He does not believe in our missile defense system and is blaming himself on our "successes" and "failures."
  21. Old26
    Old26 23 June 2017 17: 22
    0
    Quote: Kostadinov
    So it is necessary. There must be a bit of "failure" so that more money is taken and confirms that there is also "good luck". When we have "failures" we are openly reporting about it and when we say that we have time, we can believe.

    Yes? Well, comment, for example, a problem with 40H6, which can beat anyone and everyone for 600 km? What is heard about her? But nothing. Periodically, uncles with large shoulder straps say that we have it and that's it. Have you heard many statements (of ours) about failures?
    For example, how many failed launches of Zircon? Only not from the data network, but official
    Or how many successful and unsuccessful launches of the Rubezh missile were. And in general, what is it? "Frontier", "Vanguard" or "Yars-M"
    Failures hide everything. And we, and the Americans and everyone else who develops and tests rockets. That's how, for example, in recent years, Eun had unsuccessful launches?
    Therefore, you should not think that we are all honest, we are talking about every failed launch and everything else