Dzhabarov: Syria may respond to the attacks of the US coalition

45
If the US attacks on the Syrian armed forces continue, the Syrian air defense, including C-300, will retaliate against American aircraft in Syria, said Vladimir Dzhabarov, first deputy chairman of the committee of the Federation Council for International Affairs.

Earlier, the headquarters of the US-led international coalition confirmed that a US military aircraft shot down a Syrian Su-22 south of the city of Tabka.

Dzhabarov: Syria may respond to the attacks of the US coalition


Sooner or later, the Syrian air defense will retaliate, they have C-300 at their disposal
- said Dzhabarov RIA News.

He recalled that the incident was not the first in recent days, previously there were already raids and shelling by the US armed forces of the Syrian army. According to Dzhabarov, the current mechanism of interaction between the Syrian armed forces, the Russian VKS and the coalition forces in Syria is "absolutely unexplored."

It is necessary as soon as possible to the military to gather at the negotiating table and develop a new, effective mechanism to prevent such incidents.
- concluded the senator.

The coalition headquarters previously said that immediately after the attack of the Syrian forces, the coalition representatives contacted Russian partners by telephone through a channel to reduce the level of conflicts to de-escalate the situation.
  • http://www.council.gov.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +25
    19 June 2017 12: 39
    I don’t know about Syria, and Russia will brutally respond to this US aggression by cutting defense spending and buying another package of US bonds. So win.
    1. +5
      19 June 2017 12: 42
      Do you need to smear the snot? Syria did not invite US aviation. So bring down violators of the airspace of a sovereign state, like the Vietnamese at one time.
      1. +1
        19 June 2017 12: 45
        It can not, unfortunately. Could - answered.
        1. +5
          19 June 2017 12: 50
          Quote: Black
          It can not, unfortunately. Could - answered.

          All this is dangerous of course, but you can catch it ...!
          1. +4
            19 June 2017 12: 53
            Quote: DEPARTMENT
            All this is dangerous of course, but you can catch it ...!

            That's just the point that it is impossible. The maximum is to hit the American proxy.
            Now it’s more important to grab pieces of your own territory. Of the latest CAA achievements, Resaf was taken with the most important road junction in southern Raqqa. This is a tangible and rather painful answer for the plane for the Americans.
        2. +1
          19 June 2017 14: 07
          It can not, unfortunately. Could - answered.


          The Arabs what to take from them, howl anyhow, here the Vietnamese had the courage to answer and put in place the American flyers with the help of the S-75, although they were ironed more cleanly than Syria.
      2. +4
        19 June 2017 12: 59
        and how long will Syrian air defense survive after shelling American planes? Yes, after that their hands will be untied! They raskherachat everything and everyone! Not even Lavrov’s “concern” lol
        1. +1
          19 June 2017 13: 08
          Moscow region says that everything is in openwork
        2. +1
          19 June 2017 13: 49
          Quote: xetai9977
          Yes, after that their hands will be untied! They raskherachat everything and everyone

          Here is a concrete example of weakness. It is on such as xetai9977 that this mattress "blow" is designed.
          For seven years the war has been going on. For five years, mattresses have made sole decisions on Syria. And they couldn’t "heal". And now having shot down the plane suddenly changed? Bullshit.
          Previously, mattresses destroyed the Syrian army’s aircraft by the hands of terrorists, now they have fallen to the level of terrorists and destroyed the government’s aircraft by themselves.

          It is important to continue to strangle terrorists in Syria, despite the requests of mattresses.
      3. +2
        19 June 2017 13: 18
        Should we shoot down? And if the Syrians get knocked down? What do you think they will get in return? portion of tomahawk pills ???! The Americans will smash the Syrian Army and what should we do? Join the war with them ??? Explain!
        1. +3
          19 June 2017 13: 56
          You continue to sit on the couch. In Syria, our military are at war with terrorists. Let's not bother them. We will help if necessary. hi
          Democracy in the army, GLORY TO GOD !!! not. They decide without a popular referendum what and how.
        2. +4
          19 June 2017 14: 05
          Quote: Platov
          Should we shoot down? And if the Syrians get knocked down? What do you think they will get in return? portion of tomahawk pills ???! The Americans will smash the Syrian Army and what should we do? Join the war with them ??? Explain!

          And that point has played? Once climbed into Syria, then we must win. And if stripes are afraid, then you have to sit at home and wait for the tomahawks to fly into us. A powerful nuclear power, Russia should not be afraid of anything, if during the Second World War they were afraid, then neither the USSR nor Russia would exist. And the stripes understand only power, even the DPRK got scared.
          1. 0
            19 June 2017 14: 21
            Quote: Lavrenty Pavlovich
            Quote: Platov
            Should we shoot down? And if the Syrians get knocked down? What do you think they will get in return? portion of tomahawk pills ???! The Americans will smash the Syrian Army and what should we do? Join the war with them ??? Explain!

            And that point has played? Once climbed into Syria, then we must win. And if stripes are afraid, then you have to sit at home and wait for the tomahawks to fly into us. A powerful nuclear power, Russia should not be afraid of anything, if during the Second World War they were afraid, then neither the USSR nor Russia would exist. And the stripes understand only power, even the DPRK got scared.

            It's one thing to fight for your house! Other for others !!!
            1. +2
              19 June 2017 15: 46
              Quote: Platov
              Quote: Lavrenty Pavlovich
              Quote: Platov
              Should we shoot down? And if the Syrians get knocked down? What do you think they will get in return? portion of tomahawk pills ???! The Americans will smash the Syrian Army and what should we do? Join the war with them ??? Explain!

              And that point has played? Once climbed into Syria, then we must win. And if stripes are afraid, then you have to sit at home and wait for the tomahawks to fly into us. A powerful nuclear power, Russia should not be afraid of anything, if during the Second World War they were afraid, then neither the USSR nor Russia would exist. And the stripes understand only power, even the DPRK got scared.

              It's one thing to fight for your house! Other for others !!!

              The aggressor must be destroyed away from their lands and not wait when he comes.
      4. +3
        19 June 2017 13: 22
        personally my opinion ... you can not agree of course, but without the introduction of a full-fledged contingent of our troops on earth, the war cannot be stopped! They won’t beat our troops, and when ours on the earth restore order and destroy all the women and nourished the United States, then there will be peace. But alas, this will not happen, since we do not need it! in the sense of sending our soldiers to fight ...
        1. +1
          19 June 2017 13: 59
          and for the sake of what our soldiers perish for them? Assad is not a saint, the majority of the people do not like him for business, if most Syrians do not want to die for him, then why send ours? Moreover, Syria alone will not be any.
        2. +1
          19 June 2017 14: 39
          I have long suggested such an option in my comments. True, everyone here spat on me - they say that you want the coffins to fly home? But there is no other way to win.
      5. +1
        19 June 2017 15: 28
        Quote: siberalt
        Do you need to smear the snot? Syria did not invite US aviation. So bring down violators of the airspace of a sovereign state, like the Vietnamese at one time.


        Vietnam clearly fought with the Americans and the collaborators. In Vietnam, there was not 70% of the country's territory occupied by terrorists and separatists. The nation was one and stood on one front. In Syria now everything is mochilo against all. At the same time, the Americans do not fight, but complicate the life of the government forces. The very first American plane shot down by the Syrians will lead to a massive strike by cruise missiles on the infrastructure of the country, which is already barely holding on. Then from the territory of Jordan all evil spirits will be trampled. And complete outrage will begin using heavy weapons. Everything will end with what the Americans want - the state will be fragmented, the legitimate authority destroyed. Another “Somali” will appear on the map, chaos will last several decades.
    2. GRF
      0
      19 June 2017 12: 44
      We will win the main thing, it’s not important.
      So chew popcorn ...
      1. +2
        19 June 2017 13: 06
        Syrian Permanent Representative to the UN Bashar Jafari said that the airstrike "became a manifestation of US aggression against Syria."

        This blatant attack by the so-called international coalition demonstrates the deceitfulness of their anti-terrorism statements
        1. +1
          19 June 2017 15: 28
          Quote: Rich
          Syrian Permanent Representative to the UN Bashar Jafari said that the airstrike "became a manifestation of US aggression against Syria."

          This blatant attack by the so-called international coalition demonstrates the deceitfulness of their anti-terrorism statements


          Like it's a secret ...
          1. +2
            19 June 2017 15: 48
            Geisenberg, this is VO - here they comment on the topics of the posted articles, and not lay out the secrets. You need to look for secrets elsewhere
            1. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      19 June 2017 20: 58
      Something has come up a lot for you to speculate about bonds. Synchronously straight
  2. +6
    19 June 2017 12: 45
    there is no clear ideology of the struggle in Syria, and the ideology of the trading oligarchs will lead to the sale of both the interests of the allies and in the end their own, the Americans will sell it if they do not get an answer
    1. +2
      19 June 2017 12: 53
      But these guys have an ideology. Successful pursuit of the persistent shahid mobile for the armored car of the Iraqi army. The convoy immediately ran away at the sight of a threat.
      1. +2
        19 June 2017 13: 07
        Both the driver of the shahidmobile and the Iraqi column acted stupidly.
        And here the igiloids didn’t get lucky at all:
        Unsuccessful Attack of IS Terrorists on the position of the Militia Hashid Shaabi Iraqi-Syrian border
      2. +1
        19 June 2017 14: 10
        that's how these clowns are at war - they abandoned their fate, only one armored car opened fire, and yet also under the cover of turntables ..., a kindergarten and not an army ...
      3. 0
        19 June 2017 15: 29
        Quote: Zibelew
        But these guys have an ideology. Successful pursuit of the persistent shahid mobile for the armored car of the Iraqi army. The convoy immediately ran away at the sight of a threat.


        Why don’t you join shahids? You will have a clear ideology and the gurus, if you are lucky of course))
    2. +4
      19 June 2017 13: 02
      If you don’t know, then we don’t have any ideology at all, because it’s not necessary by the constitution. We would have to restore sovereignty, and there you look and the constitution would be changed, and the Central Bank would be made state.
      1. +1
        19 June 2017 13: 18
        Sovereignty is today an independent economic economy and an independent economic policy. Judging by the reaction of our media about new sanctions, our sovereignty is limping on both legs.
  3. 0
    19 June 2017 12: 47
    Well, it means the United States will roll out Syrian air defense, Israel think this will help.
  4. +1
    19 June 2017 12: 54
    Yes, yes, it will follow. Maybe after fights it’s enough to wave your fists? —Everything from these epithets from reindeers to camels and dogs is neighing.
  5. 0
    19 June 2017 12: 59
    Is this personal opinion of the first deputy chairman of the Federation Council committee on international affairs, Vladimir Dzhabarov, interesting or is this information for thought to "partners"? It’s high time to give back, just don’t pull the consequences ...
    1. +5
      19 June 2017 13: 21
      what consequences ...??? there the Iranians are well done, the Yankees troll everyone and were taken prisoner, and not what the Americans did to them, sanctions? they have long been below them, and now Russia, who needs this rotten west and America, the people? Yes, they didn’t rest against us, and the mess is because the whole elite and the president are praying to the West, all their money is there and unfortunately there is no alternative
      1. 0
        22 June 2017 16: 03
        Remind whom they shot down or sunk? We are economically, until we drag out the confrontation with the West, therefore there are problems with the sovereignty, and therefore we invest money in the American economy, because we lost in the Cold War (or, more precisely, surrendered us all)
  6. +2
    19 June 2017 13: 00
    or maybe not, or maybe yes, maybe it's all the words ......... piss into the glass - and that's all.
    What to do, war. For the young, blood and death, but for the old only talk .......

    In fact, too early. To act like that in Korea, you need to get rid of the terrorists ...... but then, parhaty urks will answer for everything !!!
  7. +7
    19 June 2017 13: 03
    In my opinion, this seemingly operational tactics of the USA and Israel - regular “minor” attacks against the SA, in fact, are strategic in nature for the situation in the BV. They show that here we are "owners", because, the Russians do not dare to answer us.
    1. 0
      19 June 2017 13: 21
      In Vietnam, the Vetkong did not win a single battle, but won the war with the United States. Who was the master of the Vietnam War?
  8. 0
    19 June 2017 13: 57
    one of the rare moments when I am glad that ours are limited only - blah blah blah ... For I want to live in a nuclear-free world.
  9. +1
    19 June 2017 14: 07
    Quote: Farid05
    most people do not love him

    Did the people personally report this to you ??
  10. 0
    19 June 2017 14: 12
    Dzhabarov: Syria may respond to the attacks of the US coalition

    Syria can only crow with Jabarov’s mouth, while the Kremlin shows deep concern.
  11. +1
    19 June 2017 14: 24
    Syria can answer. Another "Chinese" warning. No more. Syria is looking at Russia, and Russia is only showing concern. Even after May 18, the Iranian defense minister warned the United States that if again .... THEN .. Well, this time happened. So what? Well, they will probably warn you again.
  12. +3
    19 June 2017 16: 47
    The coalition headquarters previously said that immediately after the attack of the Syrian forces, the coalition representatives contacted Russian partners by telephone through a channel to reduce the level of conflicts to de-escalate the situation.

    Like, the sword doesn’t cut the guilty head? I can’t even find the words for them ....
  13. +1
    19 June 2017 16: 50
    As usual, silently wash ourselves and that's it
  14. 0
    20 June 2017 21: 57
    We can’t oppose anything in Syria to the arrogance of Americans. A downed American plane will be followed by a massive attack on Damascus and the destruction of legitimate authority in Syria. This is what the American provocateurs seek.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"