War of attrition. Part of 1. Nasser starts, but does not win

62
As is known, Six Day War 10 ended on June 1967 of the year with the complete rout of the armies of a number of Arab countries and serious territorial additions for Israel. However, the first new clashes occurred in a month. Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser could not resign himself to defeat and undertook a series of military actions against Israel known to the general public, later named War of attrition.

War of attrition. Part of 1. Nasser starts, but does not win

Gamal Abdel Nasser




Goal - return Sinai Peninsula. It lasted for about three years and ended with the signing of an agreement on a ceasefire in August 1970, without territorial changes from the parties to the conflict. It suffered losses not only from Egypt and Israel, but also from the USSR, which delivered to the banks of the Nile along with weapons their soldiers and officers. (Egypt didn’t learn the lesson from everything that happened and began to prepare for a new war with Israel. It didn’t take long to wait. But this is a completely different one story...)

If about the Arab-Israeli wars - Six day, Doomsday War and a number of others have written many sufficiently detailed and completely objective military-historical works available and known to the general reader, then about the period preceding wars, about the reasons for which they caused, as the experience of many years of network communication shows, much less is known. The information available in the network is mostly fragmented, often contradictory, and sometimes it is completely erroneous. Similarly, readers are not familiar with this long, but little noticeable against the background of world events, the "sluggishly ongoing" war.

I wanted to talk about those days in a bit more detail, mark the main events with milestones, give the names of at least some of the participants in the events and show at least a little of their role in the events of almost half a century ago. They (participants in the events) were not known to everyone then, today are forgotten, but by young people and not heard at all.

I offer to the lovers of military history a certain essay based on materials from a number of quite authoritative and trustworthy sources (the list is placed at the end of the text), provided with photographs that I selected, hyperlinks to encyclopedic articles, etc. Some of the above materials are in the public domain, and some are their property authors and placed here only for personal acquaintance of readers.

As the legendary warlord and strategist Sun Tzu (6th – 5th centuries BC) used to say in his treatise “The Art of War”: “The causes of future wars are always embedded in the results of previous wars” and was right.

On the day of the declaration of independence - May 15, 1948, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Transjordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Yemen declared war and attacked the newly created Israel with the aim of destroying the newborn Jewish state. Started war of independence of Israel. At the first stage of the invasion, the Israelis fought hard defensive battles. Since July, the Israel Defense Forces launched a counter-offensive and rejected the Arab armies. In the fall of 1949, the moment came when the Israelis could completely destroy the encircled Egyptian army, but the intervention of the British forced Israel to cancel the prepared operation. America also did not support the Israelis. Negotiations conducted at the initiative of the United Nations and the United States did not allow the matter to be completed. Israel’s victory led only to a temporary truce with the Arab countries that participated in the 1949 war. During Suez Crisis (1956) US President Dwight Eisenhower condemned the actions of his NATO allies, calling them “erroneous” and spoke on November 6 demanding the cessation of hostilities, thereby supporting the USSR’s ultimatum to Israel to cease hostilities immediately.


Dwight David Eisenhower


In the hard message of the Chairman of the USSR Council of Ministers Bulganin, the question of the very existence of this state was raised altogether.


Nikolay Aleksandrovich Bulganin


In short, the next ten years in the region were not calm ... Similarly, after the Six Day War, peace treaties were not concluded. The parties were satisfied with the cease-fire agreements. Well, and losers always think about revenge ...

Of all the Arab leaders, Ahmad Abdel Nasser was the only one for whom defeat in the war meant not only deep humiliation, but also a direct threat to personal prestige. True, the loss of Sinai, despite all its oil resources, was not such a heavy economic blow. However, forced closure Suez Canal it was much more painful. In a fit of reckless anger, the Egyptians sank all the ships in the canal waters and banned 14 ships from various countries from it, stuck in the Great Bitter Lake, located on the Suez Canal. This “blockade” lasted 8 years and cost Egypt Egypt 30 million dollars monthly, which was a significant part of the national income.

Militarily, Egypt could count on generous compensation. Moscow, firmly intending to revive its influence in the Middle East, buried on the fronts of the Six Day War, established an air bridge to Egypt and Syria. A few days after the end of the war, massive transfers of weapons, equipment and instructors to Egypt and Syria began from the USSR. Emergency economic assistance was allocated. 14 June 1967, a squadron of bombers arrived in Egypt Tu-16. Following it, Soviet military equipment and weapons began to be transferred over the air bridge to the UAR. In October, the 1967 of the year was delivered to Egypt: 110 fighters MiG-2180 - MiG-19The 40 Fighter-Bombers Su-7The xnumx bombers IL-28 and 10 - Tu-16. In 1968, the MiG-21 fighters continued to flow into service with the Egyptian and Syrian air forces, and the air defense forces launched anti-aircraft missile systems. C-75 и C-125. By the end of 1968, the Egyptian Air Force not only regained its pre-war potential, but also increased quantitatively, while at the same time modernizing itself qualitatively.

Western experts believed that all of Egypt received 400 new aircraft. Several new airfields were created at once, on which, remembering the crushing experience of the previous war, they constructed reinforced concrete caponier hangars that withstood a direct hit of a high-explosive bomb.

The Syrian air force, too, was significantly strengthened. Hundreds of Soviet military advisers, intelligence officers and military translators arrived in the country. By the end of 1968, the Syrian Arab Republic was armed with 60 fighters MiG-21, 20 fighter-bomber SU-7, there lived out their age 70 MiG-15 и MiG-17.

At the same time improved tank delivery. If before the USSR sold to Egypt and Syria for the most part its obsolete T-34 since the Second World War (new models Syria and Egypt have been buying), now they have sailed to Africa T-54, T-55 and later - T-62. Western experts believed that Egypt’s weapons had accumulated up to 470 tanks. The tank, however, was an offensive weapon, and on the counterattack, Nasser still had no strength ...

23 July 1967 Year Anniversary Colonel RevolutionsNasser proclaimed that he was preparing his army to resume the struggle against Israel. “We will never capitulate and will not agree to peace, which means surrender! "- he said.

29 August leaders of thirteen Arab countries gathered for a three-day meeting in Khartoum, where they vowed to continue the fight against Zionism. Under pressure from Nasser, they formulated their notorious triple no to Israel:
No to the world with Israel!
No - recognition of Israel!
No to negotiations with Israel!

It would seem that the victory in the Six-Day War should have led to the fact that the humiliated and defeated Arabs, realizing the futility of their efforts to destroy Israel, matured to the idea of ​​reconciling with it, but the logic of the Arab inhabitants turned out to be diametrically opposite. If before the 1967 war, for the majority of ordinary citizens of Arab countries, Israel was an unpleasant, but not dangerous thorn, now that its borders have moved apart from the mountain Hermon in the north, before the Suez Canal in the south, Israel became a very tangible threat. Residents of Cairo and Damascus, capital cities, witnessed Israeli Israeli aircraft in the sky above their heads and shouted that they had to do something about it.

The result of this Arab irreconcilability and threats was the tightening of Israeli public opinion. More and more Israelis have come to the conclusion that the only means of ensuring security is to keep the territories conquered at the time of the cease-fire in June 1967.

Meanwhile, from the end of 1967, the group of Soviet advisers who were in Egypt and before the Six Day War began to be replaced in Egypt by whole military units of the Soviet Army. So in March 1968 between OAR, as Egypt continued to call itself, and the USSR signed an agreement about temporary the deployment on its territory of an air group of six Tu-16R bombers (a Long-range reconnaissance aircraft. It was distinguished by 7 cameras, an active jamming station, and electronic surveillance equipment SRS-3 in hanging containers under the wing.) aviation for aerial reconnaissance over The Mediterranean Sea in the interest of both countries. The size of the group was determined in 130 people, but later it began to grow.

Gradually, the Soviet military presence in Egypt became so significant that many Arab leaders scolded Nasser for turning his country into a “Soviet colony”. All this had its own explanation of the Egyptian and Israeli parts were separated by the Suez Canal, and offensive operations, it seemed, could not be carried out on this front. Feeling so confident, Nasser decided to use the Soviet weapons flowing to him to continue military operations. Strictly speaking, a complete cease-fire on the channel was not achieved. Skirmishes broke out from time to time. Now, by the middle of the 1968 of the year, Nasser put the fighting on a regular basis. There are guns, shells are, let them shoot, anyway, the Israelis will not float through the channel.

Artillery duels claimed the lives of both sides. Thousands of civilians left Egyptian canal towns such as Ismailia, Port Said and Suez. In 1948, in Egypt, 15 million people lived, but now there were already 30 million inhabitants, and Nasser believed that winning the “war of attrition” with 2,5 million Israel is just a matter of time.

On the Israeli side, the soldiers began to dig in. Since special trenches in the sand cannot be broken, they began to build concrete bunkers, from which they observed the other side. Then the bunkers began to connect to the system, and so it appeared "Bar-Lev Line"named after General Haim Bar-Lev, who served as the IDF General Staff Chief from 1968 to 1972 for a year and was engaged in front-line troops.


Haim Bar-Lev


In total, the Bar-Lev line consisted of 30 advanced bunkers at the canal and 11 rear fortifications, located 8-12 km deep into the peninsula, where Egyptian artillery shells did not reach and where tank parks were provided.


One of the Israeli fortifications on the Bar Lev Line


Each of the advanced bunkers controlled about one kilometer of the front, and patrols moved between the bunkers and temporary observation posts were located. Construction of fortifications cost Israel a lot of money. (As the events of the war of the Doomsday Day showed, this money was thrown to the wind).


The Egyptians gathered artillery barrels near the canal up to 1000, which in March and April thundered 1969 without stopping. Satisfied, Nasser announced that the 60% fortifications of the Bar-Lev line had been destroyed. In fact, the fortifications survived the shelling and at that time paid off. It became clear that artillery could do little damage to a well-entrenched enemy, so gradually other armies — the navy, paratroopers, and especially aircraft — began to be drawn into this “war of attrition”.

The parties exchanged blows. On the sea off the coast of Sinai October 21 1967, the Egyptian rocket boat sank Israeli destroyer "Eilat".



Killed 47 sailors, 97 was injured.
Three days later, Israeli artillery practically leveled the oil installations in the city of Suez. After that, almost 11 months remained relatively calm on the line of confrontation.

In September, 1968, Egypt subjected the Israeli coast of the canal to massive artillery fire, during which 10 died and Israeli soldiers were injured and 18. The next shelling occurred on October 26. This time, the 13 Israelis died, the 34 were injured.
The Israeli army responded by firing on the cities of Suez and Ismailia and again struck the remnants of the oil refinery.

On the night of October 31 on November 1, a small detachment of Israeli paratroopers landed from helicopters in the depths of Egyptian territory, hundreds of kilometers from the Suez Canal. They blew up two important bridges across the Nile and a large, shortly before the Soviet-built transformer substation in Nag Hammadi. These actions by Israel proved to be very effective, as silence reigned at the front, which lasted until March 1969. At this time, the sides were strenuously building fortifications.

9 March 1969, the head of the Egyptian General Staff, General Abdul Riad and several officers who accompanied him, who came to the front line to get acquainted with the situation on the spot, were killed as a result of an Israeli projectile hit the dugout in the Ismailia region.


Abdul Munim Riad


After this, artillery duels became regular. Israeli aviation attacked Egypt’s artillery and rocket air defense batteries. But Israel suffered regular losses, which were constantly increasing. In May, June and July, according to some sources, 47 Israeli soldiers died, and 157 was injured, according to other sources of losses in May - 51, June - 89 and July - 112.

21 May 1969, the Egyptian aviation launched several raids on Israeli positions, but the Israelis were ready for this. The 3 MiG-21 were shot down in air duels, and one MiG was the victim LAW "Hawk".

Since 20 July 1969, the Israeli Air Force launched regular raids on the African coast of the canal. Although the USSR delivered enough planes to Egypt to restore the country's air force, the Egyptian pilots were still weak and virtually every air battle ended in downed MiGs.

10 September 1969, the Israelis raided Egyptian positions along the Suez Canal using Soviet-made captured armored vehicles. During the operation, 150 was killed by Egyptian soldiers, including one general. On the Israeli side, one soldier was slightly wounded.
Then the Egyptians decided to launch a large-scale campaign from the air, using all their available aviation. September 11 Egyptian aviation dealt a massive blow to the Israeli positions in Sinai, from the 70 participating 11 aircraft was lost. In these battles, from May to November 1969, the Egyptian Air Force lost a combat aircraft to the 51. Of these, 34 was shot down in air battles, 9 - anti-aircraft guns and 8 - SAM "Hawk".

On the night of 15 on 16 on November 1969, Egyptian fighting swimmers blew up an Israeli transport ship 3 in the port of Eilat. Two ships received heavy damage, and one - sank.

In December, Israeli special forces successfully conducted 1969 53 Rooster Operation - delivery to Israel of the Soviet radar installation P-12. This early warning radar was able to detect aircraft at low altitudes, its characteristics were not known to Israel, and therefore there was no means of electronic warfare against it. The paratroopers landed in 6 km from the radar station, took the Egyptians by surprise, dismantled both parts of the radar station: a hardware and antenna mast device, and carried two heavy helicopters to Sinai on the external sling. Together with the station, her calculation was captured and abducted. After this operation, Nasser dismissed the commander of the military district.


Radar P-12 at the Israel Air Force Museum


Here is what he writes in the pages of the magazine "Aerospace Defense" (the press organ of the Independent Expert Council on the problems of aerospace defense)
in the article “Fights on the Suez Canal” Colonel, Senior Lecturer of the Air Force Department of the Military Academy of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces Viktor Tkachev:
“In 1969, in the Suez Canal, two anti-aircraft missile brigades of the CA-75M (7 divisions) were deployed to cover ground forces and military facilities in the areas of Port Said, Ismailia and Suez.
The desire to cover a large number of objects with limited forces and means of ZRV led to their spraying and did not allow to organize anywhere reliable defense. The anti-aircraft missile divisions in the center of the zonal grouping were located at intervals of 25-30 km, and the flank divisions - at distances 65-75km.
With such a construction, mutual cover at low altitudes was not provided, and the flank divisions did not have any fire interaction with the central group. In addition, at four southern rivers located in mountainous terrain, fire capabilities were sharply limited at low altitudes due to large closing angles.
Engineering equipment positions did not provide protection for military equipment and personnel. Anti-aircraft missile battalions occupied a joint venture of field type with the embankment of cabs and PU. Position masking was absent.
Direct protection was carried out by platoons of anti-aircraft machine guns and only in two divisions did this task be carried out by anti-aircraft artillery batteries armed with 57-mm guns. The warning and target designation for the airborne warning system was carried out according to the scheme TsKP-KP of the division KP zrbr-KP zrdn The latter did not, as a rule, have direct connections with neighboring radar companies. In the divisions of their SRTS were absent. As a result, the flow of information about the air situation was late. Degree of combat readiness did not correspond to the flying time of targets at low altitudes.
Thus, the grouping of Egyptian anti-aircraft missiles on the Suez Canal in 1969 was not ready to repel massive Israeli air strikes, as it did not take into account the possibility of approaching enemy aircraft at low altitudes from different directions and high density of raids. The formations of the Egyptian anti-aircraft missile forces not only could not solve the task of covering the objects, but were even incapable of self-defense. The grouping itself demanded cover and, above all, from attacks from low altitudes. Due to the lack of proper concealment and a long stay of the divisions at the same positions, the Israeli Air Force command was able to reveal the Egyptian anti-aircraft missile defenses, determine its weak points, and then crush the launch positions of the air defense forces.
For five days (from 20 to 24 in July 1969), the enemy struck the SP of six anti-aircraft missile divisions. After that, the grouping of Egypt's ZRV in the canal zone was in fact destroyed ...
In total, from July 1969 of the Israel Air Force 1970 th to March 18 anti-aircraft missile divisions were out of order. ”


In this situation, the President of the ARE, Gamal Abdel Nasser, secretly visited the Soviet Union and persuaded the Soviet leadership to cover the ARE objects with Soviet forces. Despite the fact that these actions could significantly exacerbate Soviet-American relations, the Soviet government decided to implement direct military assistance - the operation received the code name "Caucasus".

To be continued

Author: Alexander Privalov

Sources:
Wikipedia articles
Project Articles Cyclists
Victor Tkachev. Fighting on the Suez Canal. http://www.vko.ru/voyny-i-konflikty/boi-na-sueckom-kanale
Alexander Okorokov. Secret wars of the Soviet Union. https://www.e-reading.club/book.php?book=95319
N. Salmin. Internationalism in Action: Local Wars and Armed Conflicts with the Participation of the Soviet Component: Military, Military-Technical, Economic (1950-1989). - Ekaterinburg: University of Humanities Publishing House, 2001
M. Shterenshis. Israel. The history of the state. 3-e edition, supplemented and revised. - Herzliya: ISRADON, 2009
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    20 June 2017 06: 07
    How much money the USSR threw out to support untalented and ungrateful allies around the world !!! It was these expenses, coupled with the Afghan adventure, that led to the collapse of the USSR.
    1. +16
      20 June 2017 11: 19
      And how much more effort has been spent on creating other mediocre ones. For example, Israel.

      Everyone had their solemn and disastrous moments in Italy. Russians, for example, constantly distribute their last shirts to everyone, cleanse the land of shit, and then live in it ourselves. This happens. But not boring!
      1. +6
        20 June 2017 14: 38
        Quote: Maskom
        It was these spending, coupled with the Afghan adventure, that led to the collapse of the USSR

        USSR collapsed su..a Gorbachev. No external factor could ruin the USSR, only the betrayal of senior management.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +3
            23 June 2017 12: 43
            Quote: Lou = Jou
            in particular, the Jewish minority, specifically Soviet Jews and destroyed the USSR.

            And the Russians (as always) stood quietly on the sidelines.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +13
        20 June 2017 15: 13
        "to support mediocre allies"
        and this continues, Assad of them.
        1. +2
          20 June 2017 19: 17
          you are all mediocre brothers Slavs and Moldavians in the first place! Syria, unlike you, has been fighting for 6 years!
          1. +3
            20 June 2017 21: 40
            But the Kazakhs are ahead of the rest! Oh, I feel, we’ll have to put things in order there after some time ...
        2. +1
          20 June 2017 19: 46
          Quote: xetai9977
          Assad of them

          And why is it so hated by our partners?
    2. 0
      22 June 2017 01: 26
      Quote: Maskom
      How much money the USSR threw out to support untalented and ungrateful allies

      Russia - the USSR was not engaged in supporting the allies, but in developing the Soviet project. What this process consisted of, we still do not know for sure, because the history of the country is unpredictable. Ultimately, under Gorbi, the USSR - Russia turned out to be the most vile ally.
  2. +20
    20 June 2017 06: 24
    I don’t understand why the USSR, and then Russia, have to climb up with the Arabs every time they announce plans for building socialism along the Soviet lines (well, or strengthen friendship and alliance with Russia by getting all kinds of goodies from the budget of the Russian Federation). Well, neither the USSR nor Russia had any benefit from this except harm. How many times did Arabs cover Russian weapons with shame instead of glory, and not count. Come on, it’s just a shame, otherwise they threw serviceable samples of secret equipment, which they then dismantled on the cog in Israel and America and figured out how she tweeted, and most importantly how it was more convenient for her to turn her neck in combat conditions. The same Gamal Abdel-on-all-Nasser was given the latest S-125 complexes at that time, which even the Vietnamese regretted, although in Vietnam they would have brought much more benefit and certainly would not have fallen into the hands of the Jews (which ended in one beautiful Israel and far from a wonderful moment for the USSR). It would have been better if instead they had handed him the second star of the Hero of the Soviet Union instead - it would have been cheaper. And how many debts were written off to all Libya, Syria, and other Yemen - you can’t count it right away, but it’s for sure dozens of lard greens, or even hundreds. And this is not counting the disinterested fraternal assistance to the comrades in the anti-imperialist and anti-Zionist struggle. And worst of all, Soviet troops died in Egypt (well, the truth is that in the USSR, in the name of the struggle against imperialism, they have never stood at a price). Ghibli also died in Syria, however, the military of the Russian Federation continues to die there, and now they don’t keep it secret, but on the contrary they are posthumously awarded with pomp. And you would ask the relatives of the victims - is Assad well-being worth the lives of their loved ones? I assure you, for many, the answers will be completely different from what was expected "in the light of the latest decisions of the party and government."
    1. +7
      20 June 2017 08: 23
      Sits in Cairo, stroking the belly
      Semi-fascist half-wiser
      The hero of the USSR
      Gamal Abdel at all Nasser

      (V. Vysotsky)
      1. +11
        20 June 2017 10: 22
        This rhyme is folk, authorship has not been established ...
        And Vladimir Semyonovich owns the words
        "Take the order from Nasser

        Vladimir Vysotsky




        Losing true faith
        It hurts me for our USSR!
        Take the order from Nasser -
        Not suitable for the Nasser Order!

        You can even cover the floor with a mat,
        Give gifts at random
        Calling Nasser our brother
        But give the Hero - stop it!

        Why is there no gold in the country?
        They gave away, bastards, gave away.
        Better to be given in the war
        And Nasser after forgive us! "

        1964
    2. +4
      20 June 2017 16: 24
      Quote: Nagan
      And you would ask the relatives of the victims - is Assad well-being worth the lives of their loved ones?

      You ask this question to the relatives of the US troops who died in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.
      Was it worth it to protect the interests of the US moneybags at the cost of their own and others' lives.
      1. +4
        20 June 2017 19: 20
        I don’t know about relatives, but my personal opinion is not worth it. To bomb them until they crawl on the belly to surrender - it's me with both hands, and to send my own under the bullets for the sake of building shit democracy to all Arabs, Afghans, and other Papuans - are categorically against it. Yes, and they do not need democracy. If in Muslim countries to organize truly free shitty democratic elections, they will certainly choose a thread of ISIS, Hamas, or Al-Qaeda. And who-thread, besides the Islamists themselves, is it necessary?
        But they did not ask me, and only taxes tear on all these adventures, since they are an expensive pleasure.
        1. +1
          21 June 2017 19: 26
          Quote: Nagan
          I don’t know about relatives, but my personal opinion is not worth it.

          That is, you seriously do not understand why the soldiers of your country die so far from their homeland?
      2. 0
        20 June 2017 19: 25
        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
        Quote: Nagan
        And you would ask the relatives of the victims - is Assad well-being worth the lives of their loved ones?

        You ask this question to the relatives of the US troops who died in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.
        Was it worth it to protect the interests of the US moneybags at the cost of their own and others' lives.

        Russia sends conscripts to Syria?
    3. +2
      20 June 2017 19: 20
      who are you anyway !? Emigrant in moderation or sympathizing with them!? I hung out the Amerzov flag so better sit and keep quiet. You are better than the Amerzov’s soldiers feel sorry for those who died in wars across the planet with Amerzami and those unleashed.!
      1. +8
        20 June 2017 19: 29
        Hamite, boy! Yes, and I'll ask you not to poke. With people like you, I never drank, and I'm not going to.
    4. +1
      21 June 2017 19: 25
      Quote: Nagan
      And you would ask the relatives of the victims - is Assad well-being worth the lives of their loved ones?

      Your soldiers are dying in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, this does not bother you, but you are very worried about the Russians.
      Is this not easy?
  3. +4
    20 June 2017 07: 04
    Once again, it does not bother to repeat:
    "To fight not by number, but by reduction"
    (Alexander Vasilievich Suvorov)
  4. +10
    20 June 2017 10: 56
    As a direct participant in those events (I had a chance to serve in the Suez Canal at that time in my youth) I would like to note the balanced nature of the article, unlike many publications on this subject, replete with factual errors and sometimes elementary ignorance of history and the substitution of facts with fantasy in style Fomenko ...
    Since the Egyptian air defense was practically suppressed during the "war of attrition", Israeli planes with virtually impunity bomb attacks in the depths of Egypt, operating at low and extremely low altitudes .. TTX. The Egyptian S-75 air defense systems did not allow them to operate at such altitudes and provide cover for troops and infrastructure, this led to serious losses, including among our military advisers ...
    Artillery dueling and BShU occurred almost daily - and were quite intense, it’s not easy to forget this ....
    All this, coupled with a number of other factors, led to the operation "Caucasus", which radically changed the course of events - but I will not anticipate the continuation of the article ...
    1. +4
      20 June 2017 11: 32
      Ranger, what was your position in Operation Caucasus?
  5. +3
    20 June 2017 12: 24
    And if the Union should allocate a small fraction of that money / resources / equipment allocated not to Arabs, but to Israel, then who knows how everything would have changed. Peace in the Middle East, a reliable ally in the region, and much more.
    But no, the leaders had "their" strange outlook on things.
    1. +5
      20 June 2017 13: 21
      Allocated. At the time of the formation of Israel, our people helped him a lot with specialists and weapons. But at that time, the Union had little money. As a result, the Jews crawled under the wing of the richer Americans. After which it was too late to change something.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +7
          20 June 2017 14: 39
          So you all write that the USSR was filling up, filling up with money gratuitous Arabs and Africans and at the same time ALL ASK ... AL! So write a review article on the FORMATION OF INDUSTRY IN THE STATE OF ISRAEL! And with the help of which "MANNES OF HEAVENLY" You have factories and other factories! Not on the porch, you gathered up the little things! Announce the WHOLE list of SPONSORS of GI since 1948.
          1. +8
            20 June 2017 18: 49
            Quote: hohol95
            So you all write that the USSR was filling up, filling up with money gratuitous Arabs and Africans and at the same time ALL ASK ... AL! So write a review article on the FORMATION OF INDUSTRY IN THE STATE OF ISRAEL! And with the help of which "MANNES OF HEAVENLY" You have factories and other factories! Not on the porch, you gathered up the little things! Announce the WHOLE list of SPONSORS of GI since 1948.

            General sponsors are repatriates from all over the world, their knowledge, hard work, dedication and sincere love for this land.
            1. +3
              20 June 2017 19: 22
              You flatter yourself very much!
            2. 0
              22 June 2017 12: 44
              Quote: Sasha Krymsky
              General sponsors are repatriates from all over the world, their knowledge, hard work, dedication and sincere love for this land

              Leave this tale for internal use. But in fact, everything was correctly indicated to you- hohol95 June 20, 2017 14:39 ↑ New to whom you owe.
          2. +1
            20 June 2017 19: 29
            Quote: hohol95
            Announce the entire list of GI SPONSORS starting from 1948 year.

            Easily. fellow
            Economic difficulties during the War of Independence and rapid population growth have demanded restrictions on domestic consumption and financial assistance from abroad. This assistance was provided in the form of loans from American banks, donations from the Jewish diaspora, and also came in the form of post-war West German reparations. After the 50 year (when the world realized that Israel was not going anywhere) they began investments into the Israeli economy. For example:
            Hadera Paper Group - is a leader in the paper and paper products market in Israel. The company was created in 1951 by a group of American investors. Today, the company and its subsidiaries employ about 2 thousand employees and the gross turnover is 2 billion dollars per year.
            1. a
              +1
              21 June 2017 09: 47
              ... West German reparations ...

              How many Soviet Jews were killed by the Nazis during the Second World War?
              Now the question is - why does Germany pay reparations to Israel?
              1. +3
                21 June 2017 11: 14
                Quote: un-e
                ... West German reparations ...

                How many Soviet Jews were killed by the Nazis during the Second World War?
                Now the question is - why does Germany pay reparations to Israel?

                On the first pig - half, one and a half million.
                To the second question - because all those directly and indirectly affected by the genocide of Jews moved to Israel. And reparations finance the defense of their descendants, so that they would not suffer a similar fate.
      2. +5
        20 June 2017 19: 20
        Quote: Molot1979
        Allocated. At the time of the formation of Israel, our people helped him a lot with specialists and weapons.

        Do not repeat the rumors.
        Assistance with weapons - Stalin allowed Czechoslovakia to sell to Israel junk and leftovers from the Second World War ... for TRIPLE price
        Specialists - this is generally from the realm of science fiction, spies and agitators - yes they have sent, but it does not attract "expert help".
        The Creation of the State of Israel - Political process that started with the advent of the movement of political Zionism in 1897 year and ended after the proclamation of 14 on May 1948 of the Declaration of Independence.

        The first Israeli power station - Introduced in the 1938 year, The power plant is named after the British politician Rufus Isaacs (1860 — 1935), whose official title was Marquis Reading. He showed great interest in investing in former Jewish Palestine, and in 1926 he became chairman of the Palestinian Electric Corporation (the forerunner of the Israeli Electric Company).
        First Israeli Kibbutz - The first collective settlement, the Quzca Dgania, was created in 1909 year (Russia is still the king of the rules!).
        First Israeli University - Hebrew University of Jerusalem, founded in 1918 year, Among the founders of the university were the largest European scholars who had Jewish roots - such as Albert Einstein, Sigmund Freud, Martin Buber.
        The first Israeli airport - Ben Gurion Airport, the airport was designed, planned and built by the authorities of the British Mandate in the 1930's.
        The first Israeli port - Haifa port - construction started at 1922 by the British.
        This list can be continued for a long time - assistance to Israel from the USSR is a little more than N I C E G O! request
        1. +1
          20 June 2017 21: 24
          So Soviet tankers-repatriates you do not think for specialists?
          But they might not have been let out of the USSR.
          From the Soviet Union from May 15, 1948 to 1951, 8163 immigrants came to Israel!
          And from the USA and Canada at the same time 1947! Apparently the Soviet and other Jews worked and fought for the Promised Land, and the North American only fell off financially! But to know MOSHNA they had TIGHT BELLED!

          In the ranks of the "Russian" company of the 82nd tank battalion of the IDF. 1948 year. The car with the number "612" has a French commander’s turret. Noteworthy are Soviet-style tank helmets. Such helmets of Czechoslovak production were used at the IDF until the end of the 1950s.
          1. +6
            20 June 2017 22: 50
            As far as I know, the repatriation to Israel from the USSR of the 1948-1951 years did not take place THANKS, but AGAINST. Most of them made their way by hook or by crook through third countries. Basically, these were Jews who came to the USSR from Poland. Those ended up there after the accession of a number of lands in Western Ukraine and simply fled from Poland from the Nazi persecution. Such people were allowed into the USSR for some time after the start of the Second World War in 1939. There were a clear minority of “Russian” Jews (married or married). "Own" the same Jews in the USSR in these years spread rot already in full growth. I hope you heard about the murder of Mikhoels and the reprisals against Jewish writers and public figures - members of the Anti-Fascist Committee.
            By the way, this is a famous photograph, the only one who for some reason calls the people depicted there "Russian" is Mikhail Baryatinsky in his book "Israeli tanks in battle."
            1. 0
              20 June 2017 22: 52
              And you, how they are called? If they are NOT RUSSIAN!
          2. +3
            21 June 2017 00: 53
            Quote: hohol95
            So Soviet tankers-repatriates you do not think for specialists?

            Not Soviet, but Jewish repatriated tankers.
            Quote: hohol95
            But they might not have been let out of the USSR.

            And they tried not to let them out - Privalov described everything exactly.
        2. The comment was deleted.
          1. +4
            23 June 2017 12: 42
            Quote: Lou = Jou
            Now, please tell me, if Jews are so advanced, smart and good, then why they are not loved anywhere

            Envy. request
  6. +10
    20 June 2017 12: 46
    A very objective and informative publication relating exclusively to the factual side of the issue. The commentary reads: why did the Union itself so support the opponents of Israel. I will express my point of view. At that time, the USSR led an active geopolitical game around the world. And BV was the forefront of this game. Oil is the blood of the economy, and in the Arab countries it is enough. Naturally, the USSR tried to keep abreast. From there, there is such keen support for Egypt, as opposed to the Saudi Arabia-paraphy of the USA. But over time, the pragmatism of the participation of the USSR in the Middle East mess, began to be replaced by outright hatred of Israel and state anti-Semitism in the USSR. Israel began to be seen as almost the main enemy. Emotions prevailed. There was a response from Israel, including the initiation of a movement for the departure of Jews to Israel, the Jackson-Vanik amendment, and the intensification of contradictions between the countries of the socialist camp. I will not say of course that the Union collapsed because of this, but I do not exclude it as one of the factors.
    Fortunately, now, between the countries, a different, fairly balanced policy is being pursued. The author does not touch on these points, which makes the publication even more substantive. The references include the work of M. Šterenshis. I recommend. It is written sensibly, a little ironically, very thoroughly and readily.
    1. +1
      20 June 2017 19: 41
      Quote: Rogue1812
      and state anti-Semitism in the USSR

      Keep up the good work and soon Hitler will become the savior of the Jews from the Russian threat.
  7. +4
    20 June 2017 15: 37
    Egypt subjected the Israeli coast of the canal to massive shelling, during which 10 Israeli soldiers died and 18 were injured.

    The Israeli army in response fired on the cities of Suez and Ismailia

    They fired on the Israeli coast alone, and in response to them two cities ... think for yourself, decide for yourself ...
    1. +7
      20 June 2017 18: 48
      Quote: Fitter65
      They fired on the Israeli coast alone, and in response to them two cities ... think for yourself, decide for yourself ...

      Do not misinterpret the text! Not "fired at the shore", but killed xnumx people and wounded 34! Maybe it was necessary to "show concern"?am
      As a child, my grandfather taught me that if one of the punks in the yard hit me - hit him in response, until you leave a living place - he will no longer climb.
      FOR NEFIG! am
      1. +2
        21 June 2017 00: 46
        And I don’t misinterpret, unlike you. I quoted from an article indicating Israeli losses. Moreover, the article clearly states that Egypt shot at Israeli troops, it seems that the war is still going on, and Israel shot back in retaliation for cities. and that’s all. And there, in response, not in response, but they shot purposefully at the cities.
        1. +6
          21 June 2017 01: 27
          Quote: Fitter65
          And there, in response, not in response, but they shot purposefully at the cities.

          Not "by city", but by infrastructure dual purpose (bridges, fuel-producing capacities, etc.). This is a huge difference. If they shot "at the cities" - they would shoot with napalm, and would there be thousands of civilians killed, but it was not. stop
          Are you not a journalist by chance? Rhetorical tricks are painfully familiar. No.

          On September 1968, Egypt subjected the Israeli coast of the canal to massive shelling, during which 10 Israeli soldiers and 18 injured. Next shelling occurred 26 October. This time 13 Israelis dead, 34 injured.
          The Israeli army in response fired on the cities of Suez and Ismailia and again inflicted impact on the remains of the refinery.
          1. 0
            21 June 2017 11: 40
            Quote: And Us Rat
            Not "by city", but by dual-purpose infrastructure (bridges, fuel-producing capacities, etc.). This is a huge difference. If they shot "at cities" - they would shoot with napalm, and if there would have been thousands of civilians killed, but this was not.

            Quote: And Us Rat
            The Israeli army responded by firing on the cities of Suez and Ismailia and again struck the remnants of the oil refinery.

            It’s handy by napalm, but still there wasn’t any shells, or maybe it was public opinion. But all the same, they fired at the cities first, well, in addition to the remnants of the oil refinery. By the way, the article doesn’t say anywhere about the dual-use infrastructure Although the city is a dual-use infrastructure. There are maternity hospitals, future soldiers are born there, they grow up in kindergartens, they study at schools. so on ...
            1. 0
              21 June 2017 17: 43
              Quote: Fitter65
              Although the city is a dual-purpose infrastructure, maternity hospitals are located there, future soldiers are born there, they grow up in kindergartens, they study at schools there. so on ...

              Your interesting logic ... what Now it’s clear why Aleppo is in ruins. recourse
              1. +1
                22 June 2017 01: 20
                Quote: And Us Rat
                Now it’s clear why Aleppo is in ruins.

                And also Dresden, Leipzig ... Destroyed under the democratic bombardment of Belgrade and Baghdad. Mosul is also being democratized. But Aleppo is Yaroslavna’s direct cry. If you and your friends would not have climbed into Syria and there would have been no Aeppo. But considering your concepts nor is there anything surprising in this.
                1. +2
                  22 June 2017 15: 08
                  Quote: Fitter65
                  also Dresden, Leipzig ... It collapsed under the democratic bombardment of Belgrade and Baghdad. Mosul is also democratizing. But Aleppo is Yaroslavna’s direct cry. Would you and your friends climb into Syria and there wouldn’t be Aeppo. But considering your ideas, which is not surprising in this.

                  You, dear, draw wrong historical parallels. Malicious trolling under the guise of pacifist care for the innocent civilian population of the neighboring cities of Egypt fifty years ago, or the usual ignorance of history?
                  I don’t communicate with trolls, but if I’m interested in history, I’ll inform you that according to the results of the Six Day War - the loss of the Sinai Peninsula, 11 500 wounded, 20 000 wounded, 5500 prisoners, remained without aircraft, tanks, etc., Nasser resigned. So, do not believe me, the people took to the streets and demanded his return! No matter what!
                  Do you know what percentage of support the President had at that moment?
                  You will not believe. Too familiar figure turned out.
                  The country is in ruins, there is nothing to eat, but Nasser knows what he’s doing - he knows well what he’s going to and begins this new war.
                  And shelling of cities?
                  The war by this time has been going on for almost two years! The people of the President love, the people believe in the President and he will endure everything.
                  600 000 people fled from the canal cities. But not from bombing, but from fear of them. Israeli planes simulated raids every night, flying on a shaver above houses, setting off at a peak, switching to afterburner, etc. It was also psychological pressure.

                  Now, about ruined cities, friends and concepts.
                  You should know that in the Israeli army, the principle of the obligatory response has operated and is still in effect. Simply put, any artillery attack, any sabotage, any shelling should be punished. And as fast as possible. Moreover, the answer must be sharp, strong and, as they like to say now, “disproportionate”. This is due to the mentality (read, concepts) of the local opponents of Israel. The slightest indecision or gentleness is instantly perceived by them as weakness and leads to the futile hopes of the enemies to win, from here to the escalation of the conflict and its delay in time.

                  With a similar mentality, Soviet soldiers encountered in Afghanistan, and after years in Chechnya. How and for what was bombed and fired by artillery there, everyone knows and remembers?

                  It’s not for me to teach country leaders how to deal with their own citizens. Remember what Grozny was turned into? This is not NATO, but your friend who acted according to his own ideas and believed at that moment that it was right. Aleppo was not bombed by the Israelis, but the ruler there, your current friend, who acted according to the same textbook. The rebels and other Bandyukovsky sheluponi, as you know, had no aircraft and no.
                  Something like that.
                  1. 0
                    8 May 2018 07: 53
                    A. Privalov (Alexander Privalov)
                    Remember what Grozny was turned into?

                    A lover to remember about Grozny should poke his face without hesitation ... sorry, face, in Fallujah.
  8. +1
    20 June 2017 15: 42
    Hmm, where could you think about your population?
  9. +7
    20 June 2017 17: 46
    Thank! Alexander Privalov. Pretty deep analysis.
    I learned some moments for the first time, the rest is locally arranged on the shelves.
    I look forward to continuing!
    Try to leaf through Leonid Mlechin, on this issue, his articles add color.
    Thank you.
    1. +5
      20 June 2017 18: 35
      I agree with you, Sasha, that the sensible publication was obtained by Alexander Privalov. I also look forward to continuing. It’s probably not worth it to leaf through L. Mlechin - he is lightweight, he gives the material chaotically, it happens that he uses questionable versions. However, this is only my purely subjective impression. One provocatively catchy title of his book and the film “Why Stalin created Israel” already characterizes Mlechin as a person who is not very smart.
      1. +3
        20 June 2017 18: 43
        Quote: Bindyuzhnik
        One provocatively catchy title of his book and the film “Why Stalin created Israel” already characterizes Mlechin as a person who is not very smart.

        Why do you think so? smile
        1. +2
          20 June 2017 18: 54
          Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
          Why do you think so?

          Because this statement does not correspond to historical truth, and L. Mlechin, as a person engaged in history, cannot but know this. Moreover, in the preface to the book, he writes that all the experts to whom he gave the book for review before publication, unanimously advised to change the name. He did not change
          1. +2
            20 June 2017 19: 12
            Quote: Bindyuzhnik
            Because this statement does not correspond to historical truth

            So what? What do you think when he wrote this book, he tried his best to comply with historical truth? laughing
            Quote: Bindyuzhnik
            L. Mlechin, as a person engaged in history

            Already funny.
            Quote: Bindyuzhnik
            Moreover, in the preface to the book, he writes that all the experts to whom he gave the book for review before publication, unanimously advised to change the name. He did not change

            Did you buy this book? If so, I feel sorry for you. You could spend the money more profitably than throwing it in waste paper. smile
            1. +3
              20 June 2017 19: 44
              Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
              Did you buy this book? If so, I feel sorry for you. You could spend the money more profitably than throwing it in waste paper. smile

              Of course not . Yes, I don’t have time to read paper books either. I download the audio version and listen while doing other things at the same time or while driving.
      2. +2
        20 June 2017 19: 12
        Miron! I understand you and share your opinion, but he has collected a lot of information, without conditionally the part is fake, and a knowledgeable author will definitely filter the husk.
        And bribe rare photos and video materials that can also be used for clarity.
        1. +3
          20 June 2017 19: 49
          Yes, I do not deny - you can find grains of interesting information from Mlechin. By the way, who is this author - Alexander Privalov? I liked the publication, did you have to read his other essays?
          1. +2
            20 June 2017 20: 46
            Quote: Bindyuzhnik
            Yes, I do not deny - you can find grains of interesting information from Mlechin. By the way, who is this author - Alexander Privalov? I liked the publication, did you have to read his other essays?

            No, I didn’t have to, I’m a new person on the forum, but in the search on the site I also found his article, at my leisure I read it.
          2. +2
            21 June 2017 00: 58
            Quote: Bindyuzhnik
            ... and who is this author - Alexander Privalov ...

            So you can ask him personally. wink
            https://topwar.ru/user/А.+Привалов/
    2. a
      0
      21 June 2017 09: 50
      Mlechina read? It seems to write well, only after reading the darling the bad remains ... well, it’s like from the former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia, now living in the USA.
  10. +3
    20 June 2017 19: 00
    The destroyer Eilat was sunk by missiles from the 183 project (Komar), and the illustration for the text for some reason shows the project 206 ("Wasp") missile.
    1. +5
      20 June 2017 19: 44
      You are absolutely right! I repent, sprinkle ashes on my head! feel

      Here is the "Komar" from the 183P series


      And here is the “Eilat”, back in its time, the ship of His Majesty “Zilous” (“Zealous”)
      1. The comment was deleted.
  11. +1
    28 June 2017 10: 47
    Those who liked the first part.
    It turned out pondering: War of attrition. Part of 2. "Caucasus" in Sinai
    https://topwar.ru/118850-voyna-na-istoschenie-cha
    st-2-kavkaz-na-sinae.html