Analysts predict a great future for the SCO

40
Recently, a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) was held in Astana. Experts considered it "historical". And there are reasons for this: the organization has accepted new members. Both states included in the SCO are nuclear powers: India and Pakistan. From now on, the SCO unites almost half of the world's population.

Analysts predict a great future for the SCO




Recall the expansion of the SCO was commented by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who represented Russia at the summit. He believes that the organization will become even more influential, and not only on the scale of Eurasia. There is evidence of the growth of the authority of the SCO - the UN Secretary General for the first time participated in the summit.

“The expansion of the SCO will undoubtedly contribute to the fact that it will become more powerful and influential in the political, economic and humanitarian spheres,” President Putin is quoted as saying. "Vesti".

The Shanghai Cooperation Organization has expanded geographically and strengthened its international reputation. After the Astana summit, the SCO entered a new stage of development. Secretary of the organization R. Alimov congratulated the representatives of India and Pakistan, who became full members of the structure, reports 24.kz. He also stressed the timeliness of the antiterrorist statement of the heads of the SCO member states, given the geopolitical situation in the countries adjacent to the organization’s borders.

Of course, the new members of the “Shanghai family” are interested primarily in trade and economic cooperation. In addition, the SCO members intend to strengthen cultural and humanitarian ties.

“Just think,” writes in your blog analyst M. Averyanov - if in 2015, it was believed that half of the population of our Earth lives in the SCO countries, then with the added billion and a half billion the organization became the union of the greater part of humanity! This colossus, which possesses practically unlimited military and political opportunities in the future, is the largest market on the planet and controls most of the natural resources, including minerals and fresh water. ”

Averyanov also notes that, on the whole, the SCO is not an anti-terrorist coalition, but the declared goal of combating terrorism clearly becomes a priority: it is no coincidence that V. V. Putin devoted his speech primarily to the anti-terrorism topic. In addition, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the summit’s guest UN Secretary-General António Guterres spoke of the need to unite efforts in the fight against terrorism. Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani also spoke on this topic.

Thus, given the fact that countering terrorism implies close military cooperation and cooperation in the economic sphere, we can predict a tendency to strengthen ties between the SCO states.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    40 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      16 June 2017 08: 06
      Of course, a large one-third of the world's GDP and half of humanity. Only one thing confuses, each country has its own plans for the SCO and its own interests, so far it does not smell of solidarity. If only some aliens drew themselves or some kind of Hitler that would get together wassat .
      1. +3
        16 June 2017 08: 24
        Quote: RASKAT
        If only some aliens drew themselves or some kind of Hitler that would get together wassat .


        Do you have few barmales? No need to click on more troubles.
        1. +6
          16 June 2017 09: 05
          Hi Victor! hi
          Quote: cniza
          No need to click on more troubles.

          Do not touch famously while it is quiet.
          1. +3
            16 June 2017 09: 08
            Welcome hi
            Pasha, it seems to me that someone is bored of living and there are not enough problems.
            1. +4
              16 June 2017 09: 39
              According to the principle: we are not afraid of difficulties, we overcome them.
              1. +3
                16 June 2017 09: 42
                I will not insult them, but adventures on the fifth point will find them themselves.
                1. +4
                  16 June 2017 09: 47
                  Quote: cniza
                  adventures on the fifth point they themselves will find.

                  Demand creates supply. wink
                  1. +3
                    16 June 2017 09: 49
                    Yeah, no one canceled the "snout" laws.
      2. +2
        16 June 2017 08: 37
        If the SCO is the second WTO, then what is its advantage in world politics? There is no Charter, but there is a certain Charter subject to registration at the UN. Thus, the UN, which is run by the United States in fact, should control the SCO. Therefore, the SCO, at the moment, is a rather amorphous and poorly structured organization. Prior to India's membership, China was the undisputed leader. Now his leadership has fallen, but Pakistan has come in opposition to India. It seems that this was a condition from China for admission to the SCO of India. On the other hand, India and China are economically closely tied to the United States, unlike Russia. And what, they intend to break these ties?
        1. +4
          16 June 2017 08: 56
          Quote: siberalt
          On the other hand, India and China are economically closely tied to the United States, unlike Russia. And what, they intend to break these ties?

          Why tear it up? Through them, foreign economic bonds will be carried out. They, after all, are not under sanctions. smile
          1. +2
            16 June 2017 09: 04
            And what, the SCO was organized due to sanctions against Russia? Taki, they are in the hands of the same China and India. From Russia, resources can be drawn easier and cheaper. Now they have learned to count all the money and no one will give a cent. In addition to reducing the economic pressure of the Americans in the long run, so far nothing is visible. Here, our interests partly converge.
            1. +4
              16 June 2017 09: 10
              Quote: siberalt
              And what, the SCO was organized due to sanctions against Russia?

              Not. But India and Pakistan have just entered. In some ways you are right, but the word “pull” ... Natural resources are one of our main assets and it would be foolish not to use it. We will not use, others use. Another thing is how to use ...
      3. +5
        16 June 2017 10: 07
        Quote: RASKAT
        Only one thing confuses, each country has its own plans for the SCO and its own interests

        Yes, we’ll agree, the main thing has begun to unite .. It’s not for nothing that the United States is furious and spread rot in Russia!
        We have Russians such a property of character, to unite peoples and adversaries of different stripes to punish! soldier
    2. +1
      16 June 2017 08: 06
      If the participants have enough wisdom ... and the courses and guidelines of the incoming countries (as well as governments) will be stable regarding this issue ... then the prospects are obvious ...
      Opponents will undermine unity ... beat on economically weak links ... no need to relax ...
    3. 0
      16 June 2017 08: 07
      That's when the SCO will become a military bloc, like NATO, then everyone will be fine)) Especially us)
      1. 0
        16 June 2017 08: 41
        SCO will never become a military bloc, calm down. The SCO Charter states that this is neither its goals nor objectives. And it is directly indicated that the SCO does not have an anti-American focus.
    4. +2
      16 June 2017 08: 10
      controls most of the natural resources, including minerals and fresh water. ”

      Is this about Russia? wink Obviously not about Pakistan and India, the Indus and Ganges were littered, the Moscow river is resting.
      1. +2
        16 June 2017 09: 01
        Quote: Barracuda
        controls most of the natural resources, including minerals and fresh water. ”

        Is this about Russia? wink Obviously not about Pakistan and India, Indus and Ganges were ruined, Moscow river is resting.

        Black storks returned to Moscow suburbs, whom they never wanted to see there ...
    5. +23
      16 June 2017 08: 14
      Quote: RASKAT
      Of course, a large one-third of the world's GDP and half of humanity. Only one thing confuses, each country has its own plans for the SCO and its own interests, so far it does not smell of solidarity. If only some aliens drew themselves or some kind of Hitler that would get together wassat .

      Always any country in the world in any union seeks their interest. Otherwise there would be no such alliances. And everyone has one goal: to confront the economically and flightingly imperialist west ...
    6. +4
      16 June 2017 08: 25
      Ha Ha Ha !!! India and Pakistan are always at odds with their territorial claims to each other, respectively, and in economic terms there is also a war ... China and India have territorial graters too .... I wonder how they will agree then? SCO is like one famous Krylov fable !!! Swan, Cancer and Pike !!! Although there is no Swan Cancer and Pike !!! Quartet !!! Four nuclear powers each with their own interests !!! This is fun! The outcome of the entire SCO can only be expressed as follows:
      And you, friends, no matter how you sit down,
      Everything is not good for musicians (s)
      1. +2
        16 June 2017 08: 39
        what are they then, enmity in one organization? maybe there are still problems that are more significant than small-town interests?
        1. +2
          16 June 2017 08: 42
          Do you recall the block of Warsaw Pact countries or the current NATO and the European Union? A lot of their consent was and is? What is NATO and the European Union? Look at our CSTO !!! Who is in the woods, who is by firewood and in the SCO powers with their geopolitical interests, there is generally peace, chewing gum friendship only in words
          1. +2
            16 June 2017 08: 44
            I repeat, not about consent, but about common problems. this often reduces those who have previously been on the counter.
            1. 0
              16 June 2017 08: 49
              And strangely enough they don’t have common problems !!! Well, at least kill, I can’t recall any common problems
              1. 0
                16 June 2017 09: 25
                Quote: Nehist
                And strangely enough they don’t have common problems !!! Well, at least kill, I can’t recall any common problems

                There are common problems, even as they are - these are the consequences of the colonial and semi-colonial past, economic backwardness and dependence on the West, the development of their countries under the pressure of the West, which is total in all respects, requires, if not unification of efforts, then at least a common platform with clear and uniform rules . By the way, territorial issues are the only hard-to-solve issues between them, which also for the most part are a consequence of the colonial dependence of these countries.
                1. 0
                  16 June 2017 09: 33
                  And how do you introduce these uniform rules? China is completely self-sufficient and follows the path of progress by leaps and bounds, in contrast to our Russia, where the period of stagnation has dragged on and there is no way out. India is also a completely independent country and can build what Russia currently cannot afford. Oh yeah, you forgot different religions, not just different ones, but from the word at all !!! I won’t remind you of the ministry. As for Pakistan, it’s an eternal adversary that the USSR that the Russian Federation in that region
                  1. 0
                    16 June 2017 09: 52
                    Quote: Nehist
                    And how do you introduce these uniform rules?

                    I can imagine. It’s like it’s here on the site, everyone has a place, but the rules are the same, that is, if you want to be heard and understood, sign the agreement and everything is left, step right - execution.
                    Quote: Nehist
                    China is completely self-sufficient
                    India is also a completely independent country
                    Why do you think so? These are bare words from the word at all. The mentality has nothing to do with the word at all. Well, as for Pakistan - for 200 years the territory has been under shaving, now under the USA, if the SCO gives one of the opportunities not to be under anyone, what do you think Pakistan will be with and the entry of this country into the organization is talking about?
      2. +2
        16 June 2017 09: 00
        Quote: Nehist
        India and Pakistan are always at odds with them territorial claims to each other, respectively, and in economic terms, also a war ... China and India have territorial graters too .... I wonder how they will agree then?

        It is for this that the SCO was created so that they can at least somehow agree. Or is it better to quarrel through a wall all the time?
        The UN has long become obsolete, mainly because of the United States, which has crushed everything in this organization. Although almost all the performances of the political theater take place outside the United States. Therefore, an alternative organization (without the US) has a place to be and will be useful for member countries.
        1. 0
          16 June 2017 09: 03
          How is it useful? Especially Russia? Pakistan so this is generally the patrimony of the United States
      3. 0
        16 June 2017 14: 44
        It seems like an argument and a logical one. UN, where is it at all? 4 frenzy against 3. Well, and the difference in quantity. It is clear that the trio sang for a long time, the quartet has not yet been sung, however, there is already an option to move from the quartet to the orchestra, and the trio has the option of becoming a solo. So-and-so already solo with the dancers.
    7. +1
      16 June 2017 08: 34
      Quote: Vladimir 38
      That's when the SCO will become a military bloc, like NATO, then everyone will be fine)) Especially us)

      And she will never become one. How do you imagine a military bloc in which there are two enemies that are already unimaginable for more than half a century - India and Pakistan? After all, there are still dialogue partners and observer states that can enter the SCO in the future, states that have applied for participation in the SCO as observers All of them in the future (far or near) can join the SCO.
      And how do you see this military bloc which will include the countries: India-Pakistan, Turkey, Iran, Syria, Egypt, Israel ??? Pretty will be a military alliance
      1. 0
        16 June 2017 08: 44
        Quote: Old26
        Quote: Vladimir 38
        That's when the SCO will become a military bloc, like NATO, then everyone will be fine)) Especially us)
        And she will never become one.

        I agree - never. The goals are not in the political sphere, but in the economic sphere.
        Quote: Old26
        How do you imagine a military bloc in which there are two enemies that are already unimaginable for more than half a century - India and Pakistan?

        I perfectly imagine! fellow This is a NATO bloc, in which two irreconcilable enemies, Greece and Turkey, are in about the same period. bully
        With all the rest - I completely agree. hi
      2. +1
        16 June 2017 08: 46
        if there is a common enemy then this is not possible)
    8. +1
      16 June 2017 08: 43
      In the SCO, Russia and China rule the ball. Dohrena what agreements are. The only country to which there are no claims from China is Russia. A joint missile defense exercise? guess who. Calls and chips are specific. It’s not just that we are selling the Su-35 and S-400 type.
      And all other countries envy us. And "Katyusha" is an eternal hit in China, like Pavel Korchagin with "Dawn Quiet".
      1. +1
        16 June 2017 08: 59
        You are mistaken !!! China still has claims to Russia, just in the light of the recent demarcations of the border, they are not voicing them now. But over time, voiced again. Suppose that China’s claim for a 55km border section in the Altai mountains has not yet been resolved
        1. 0
          16 June 2017 09: 16
          You can also invoice China for the release of the Japanese invaders in the Second World War, the transfer of such divisions, nuclear technology and much more. It all depends on our politicians. Under Stalin, they had no complaints about the USSR.
          1. +1
            16 June 2017 09: 18
            That's when we have a population in the Far East will not be 7 million but at least 27 then you can put any claim !!! Although the most absurd in the form of your great wall, the sun blocks us
    9. 0
      16 June 2017 08: 57
      And the analysts do a good job. Analyze - predict - to an ATM. Well, half the Planet would have no future. I also wanted to analyze something like that. wassat .
    10. 0
      16 June 2017 09: 11
      Quote: cariperpaint
      if there is a common enemy then this is not possible)

      And if not? We, too, can be in the same military bloc with the United States, provided ... well, for example, an attack by alien invaders on Earth. And if there is no attack, there will be no military alliance with the United States. So here, with the SCO. If there is no common enemy, on the basis of what it will be possible to have a military organization, which will include Arabs, Persians, Jews?
      1. 0
        16 June 2017 09: 16
        Especially if you remember that the Persians initially considered the whole Arab world a sphere of their interests !!!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"