Is the modern "restless economy of the elder Semibaba" on the way?

18
Probably, in some ways great commanders are similar to players. Especially in those games where you need to bluff. How many times, reading descriptions of battles and simply battles of past wars, I was amazed at the brilliant foresight of commanders, the ability to deceive the enemy, to create the necessary supply of forces, while completely convincing the enemy of the opposite. How many times the enemy hit the wrong positions. How many units and formations held where a company or battalion stood against him ...

Many people remember the old Soviet film "Restless Farming". The first directorial work of the great Michael Zharov. Merry lyrical comedy about the life of a false airfield during the Great Patriotic. The object, the main task of which is to divert the enemy's aircraft from the present airfield. If we consider the movie from the point of view of the military, then we get a great educational film for the same units. Shown almost everything. From the methods of organizing a false object to fight the enemy's scouts.



And with what humor is told about the Red Army soldier Ogurtsov! The stupid soldier who invented a system of mobile aircraft. And it was this system that allowed the chief of the facility, the foreman Semibab, not to risk the fighters to attract the attention of the enemy aviation. When the aircraft began to "take off", there was no need to create an imitation of panic. His fighters sat in the trenches and controlled mock-ups.

Modern warfare, not the past, but the one that is possible, will also abound in such episodes. No one is surprised at inflatable rocket launchers. No one is surprised by the inflatable tanks and other armored vehicles. False objects today are a necessary reality of war. An increase in the power of weapons, accuracy in delivering strikes, the presence of special shells, bombs, and missiles leaves little chance of survival. Alas, there is no such armor that modern specialized ammunition could not penetrate.

The most powerful and dangerous weapons today are missiles. Rockets of any type. It is a missile strike that is most effective in terms of the destruction of manpower and enemy targets. This is due to the high accuracy of the rocket weapons and a huge striking force. But besides this, rocket weapons make it possible to solve assigned tasks without direct contact with the enemy. What, you see, is really important today. The value of each fighter has increased many times due to the need for quite a long preparation. Modern weapons require a trained soldier.

For quite a long time we considered rockets as a very expensive weapon. At the same time, they somehow completely forgotten that modern air defense and missile defense systems are not cheap either. Some of these systems are quite comparable in cost with attack systems. Today, anyone, even a person far from missile weapons, will tell about the false warheads with which attacking missiles are equipped.

This is quite an effective system. But ... Like any system, it has its drawbacks. And the main drawback is the need for a real launch of rockets. And not one or two, but a series. The capabilities of modern missile defense are quite large. This means that these false objects are very far from the "object" of foreman Semibaba. By the way, this also applies to the use of aviation.

Engineers and designers from the Radio Electronic Technologies concern understood this perfectly. Let me remind you that the concern created in 2009 has already "presented" us the "Lever-AV" complex, the Khibiny family of electronic warfare systems (for SU aircraft), the Krasukha and Moscow land complexes, the multifunctional complexes Mercury-BM " And so on. Yes, and avionics of most of the leading aircraft models (PAK FA, Su-35С, Yak-130, MiG-29К / cube, Il-476, Tu-204СМ) and helicopters (Ka-52 "Alligator", Mi-171А2) was created in the same place .

And they did not just understand, but began to solve the problem in a completely different way. Why do you need to launch expensive and difficult to produce ballistic missiles? Why do we need to make air strikes by divisions and armies? There must be another way ...



And to the honor of the concern's employees, this path was found. If the most complex systems control a weapon, then ... it is necessary to deceive these systems. But this is exactly what the EW complexes are doing! Here is what Vladimir Mikheev, Advisor to the First Deputy General Director of KRET, said to 10 in June:

"There are so-called false aerodynamic targets. They have a special EW system installed. It can depict a group of planes or cruise missiles in flight and simulate a false strike. Such works are at the final stage."

Moreover, according to Mikheev, several types of missiles, including cruise, of various bases can be used for this. Even air-to-air class ...

So, on the approach the new "restless households of foreman Semibaba". Imagine a "phase shift" in the enemy's warning systems when they see hundreds of flying missiles and airplanes? And they will not only see, but will give a command to destroy ... And they will give such a command. Massive raid ...

We often say that we have some kind of top-secret weapon. What just do not write in various media about this. And politicians, like the famous leader of one of the political parties, "throw logs on the fire." Convince readers in the presence of these weapons, I will not. Maybe eat, maybe not. But the fact that the new is a well-forgotten old, based on modern technology, is a fact. So it is worth reconsidering the Soviet war films. How many more restless farms are there ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    15 June 2017 07: 51
    MALD, ADM-141 ITALD, ADM-160 ... that’s ours "woke up" and voiced.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      15 June 2017 08: 37
      Quote: enzO
      among those who have enough brains to protest.

      You didn’t miss a particle. "Not enough brains" must be written ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +4
    15 June 2017 09: 13
    Somehow it’s not very good ...
    Electronic systems of misleading the enemy - at REBovtsev
    Layouts and other things for sappers
    Smoke - at RKhBZ.
    And the infantry, which generally does not seem to be involved, is not at all involved in business. Not aware of the possibilities of means to deceive the enemy, nor the dangers that arise as a result.

    Apparently, some "intersectoral groups" are needed. By deception and disguise., And not only. For example, similarly, it is necessary to combine airborne reconnaissance and aviation for complex destruction of the enemy and the unification of forces and means of reconnaissance and determination of the coordinates of targets.
    1. +2
      15 June 2017 21: 31
      Well, let's say we made the next "intersectoral group", then what? after N-years there appears a “shitty_A” about which this “intersectoral group” of nichrome does not know, and what's the use of this group? no, she learns about shitty_A, when the enemy is already realizing it and then our brave group will run "catch up and overtake." How will this “intersectoral group” learn about innovations and promising directions? she has no contacts, and if so, they are known only to a few people. And then there’s “fucking_B” which is very useful and that Private_X came up with, but he’ll sit on the pope for sure and will not tell anyone about it (especially the same “intersectoral group”), because he won’t get money from it, but he’ll get hemorrhoids for sure, well, why the hell is he so happy?
  5. +3
    15 June 2017 10: 25
    I frankly did not understand, and NEWS is what ??? Such information has recently been already published on VO !!! Link: https://topwar.ru/117762-kret-zavershaet-rabotu-p
    o-sozdaniyu-sistemy-reb-imitiruyuschey-massirovan
    nyy-rocketnyy-strike.html
    Alexander! Read VO carefully before publishing such "news" (tautalogy is obtained !!!)
    1. +1
      15 June 2017 10: 43
      Recently, this author personally disappointed me. Strong populism and the desire to lay out an article for the sake of quantity, as I understand it, suffered. They have been talking about powerful electronic warfare systems for a long time. I want to know what with the entry into service? Why in Syria because of MANPADS terrorists, we lost so many helicopters with our military professionals?
      1. 0
        15 June 2017 11: 48
        There were not only MANPADS
      2. 0
        16 June 2017 16: 12
        Quote: Svoy_tovarish
        Why in Syria because of MANPADS terrorists, we lost so many helicopters with our military professionals?

        There may be two reasons for this:
        - either all these helicopter KOEPs of the "President" type do not work (and they definitely work, I know that),
        - either on the affected helicopters these complexes were not corny.
        That is the whole reason.
      3. +1
        16 June 2017 22: 16
        Quote: Svoy_tovarish
        It suffered a strong populism ...

        What side is populism here? request
        Populism (from lat. Populus - people) - a political position or style of rhetoric, appealing to the needs of the masses as opposed to the needs of the elites.
    2. 0
      15 June 2017 10: 47
      I will not dissuade readers about the presence of this weapon. Maybe, maybe not
      ---- for sure everything is there. and only fools will use it. who will not be able to "chat" at the negotiation table of the "partner
    3. +1
      15 June 2017 21: 44
      Quote: venik
      I frankly did not understand, and NEWS is what ???

      and I.
      Add: an article about what?
      Quote: venik
      Alexander! Read carefully

      it seems to me that the Author: Alexander Staver is topwar (owner, co-principal or beneficiary), ...
      however you can clarify
      Quote: Black Colonel
      There were not only MANPADS
      fool

      Yes? and what else? Chur Turks do not take
      I have not heard that the bearded have aviation and air defense systems in service
  6. 0
    15 June 2017 11: 32
    Yes, when launching one ICBM, the same false warheads fly, what is the article about? that turned on the electronic warfare, and in return a bunch of missiles will fly back
  7. +2
    15 June 2017 13: 19
    "Imagine a" phase shift "in enemy alert systems when they see hundreds
    flying rockets and planes? And not only will they see, but they will give a command to destroy ...
    And they will give such a command "///

    They won’t give. There are no d_urak. Signals from radars, optical devices are processed by software
    before appearing on the display. And they will appear with the marks "false target like fighter"
    "," Su-35 "aircraft," Caliber cruise missile, "" false target like KR ".
    False goals are a worthwhile thing. But to make them qualitatively in order to “buy” the enemy
    expensive and complicated. There are no easy solutions in this area.
    1. +1
      15 June 2017 13: 56
      It’s difficult in life. For some authors of VO there is nothing complicated. Even write an article about nothing.
      1. 0
        15 June 2017 14: 30
        Well, I don’t know how long it comes to some, but earlier, in order to sink one Ticonderoga, it was necessary to launch at least 4 KP in it, so that at least one got. And better - at least 8 ... And now - ONE is enough !!!!!!!!! It will create a cloud of false targets around itself, on which all missiles will be spent, approximately similar to the false warheads of ICBMs, with the same analogy that all false targets are virtual. Ammunition Buyan-M of 8 anti-ship missiles is able to erase an AUG order ...........
        1. +5
          15 June 2017 17: 09
          "with the share of analogy that all false goals are virtual.
          Ammunition Buyan-M of 8 anti-ship missiles is able to erase the order AUG "///

          AND! Are virtual. So they would immediately say fellow . I quite believe that virtual
          Buyan-M ammunition from 8 anti-ship missiles is able to erase a virtual AUG order.
  8. 0
    15 June 2017 17: 41
    the main thing is that Kees-Kees does not jam ...
  9. +1
    20 June 2017 22: 35
    What is good about the Internet is that you can write anything you want, you can refute it with a bunch of arguments, they can also be safely banded down simply by the laws of physics (not quite correctly interpreting them), etc. etc.
    It is worth adding seriousness to the articles, otherwise it turns out something similar to Dave Majumdar, which is not good.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"