Military Review

Black top, white bottom. How the American censorship arranged circumcision interview with the president of Russia

54
Attention! Attention! Watch everyone! A full hour on NBCNews! Interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin! Only in prime time! Megin Kelly - black top, white bottom - and the "dictator" Putin in the telyashchike!


Black top, white bottom. How the American censorship arranged circumcision interview with the president of Russia


For almost a day, this kind of advertising was on the American channel, the ratings of which were beaten by the time of the broadcast of the interview with Vladimir Putin historical records. This suggests that among American viewers, interest is huge both directly in the personality of the Russian president (both with a minus sign and a plus sign), and in what way Putin is going to answer American questions-claims regarding the administration of domestic and foreign policy.

Attention is also drawn to the fact that the level of popularity of political shows or interviews with politicians among American viewers is much lower than entertainment programs. But the interview with Putin, presented as “hot”, led to the fact that on that day this program turned out to be the most rated, and so rated, that it is unlikely that in the near future the record for the number of viewers watching NBCNews broadcasts would be surpassed. True, they expected more. But in the end it turned out like in that joke: he will eat something, but who can give it to him. So the American audience was not allowed ...

Here is the Russian version of the interview ("Russia 24"):


The most interesting thing is that Magin Kelly actually interviewed the Russian president, that the recording of the conversation was really conducted by NBC operators, only the audience of the western TV channel saw and heard almost two times less than what they should have seen and heard about Vladimir Putin and Vladimir Putin’s mouth .

The fact is that Magin Kelly and the team of the channel she represented acted as "ritual trimmers." And instead of the full version of the conversation with Vladimir Putin in the country with the freedom of speech protected as the pupil of the eye, a cut-off copy of the interview was aired. And cut off so that the American schemers during the process managed to cut out from the recording of an interview with Putin everything that somehow exposed the negative in the United States itself, and that could somehow tell the viewer in the United States that Putin is not only the president, but also an ordinary person. It was not in the "American version" that the US intelligence services actually eliminated the social movement "Occupy Wall Street", nor the statements of the President of the Russian Federation about his brother buried at the Piskaryovsky cemetery in Leningrad. And there were 11 minutes of ether, in which the words of Ms. Kelly were almost more than the words of Vladimir Putin ...

Apparently, the American journalist seriously scared Vladimir Putin’s statement that if Flynn was forced to resign from the councilors just because he sat at the RT anniversary party for several minutes sitting at the same table with Russian President Vladimir Putin, then in the US a journalist who worked with Putin for two days, "they can put them in jail at all." In the end, it came out from American journalists as in the worst media variations of the USSR, when "Comrade Brezhnev finished second, and the American president was the last one." As they say, they did not seem to have lied, but presented, as is often the case in today's Western realities, everything is as beneficial for those giving money to the same NBC channel.

Here is a comment from Vladimir Solovyov on Radio Vesti FM about what turned into an interview with the President of Russia on NBC:


By the way, in one of News As far as Kelly’s conversation with Putin was concerned, the question was already raised during the economic forum about how many international forums could be recalled in Washington, New York, Brussels or London, where the Russian journalist would be invited as a main moderator of the forum, offhand, Margarita Simonyan? .. Something is not recalled ... And Russian journalists are not invited to such events for the simple reason that the present West, as noted above, in terms of “freedom of speech” decided to catch up and overtake the USSR into the most “censored ny years. That is, all the worst that at one time in the Soviet Union was, the modern West decided to take as a guide to action. He fences off, fences off, fences off and against this background he tries to calm himself down with phrases in the style: “Russia is isolated”. Gentlemen, partners, well, stop hanging noodles on your own ears and on the ears of your fellow citizens - the American audience did not eat too much burgers and drank cola to protect themselves from the opportunity to get acquainted with the full version of the same interview with Magin Kelly and Vladimir Putin. The same RT will convey not only to the Americans, but also to hundreds of millions of citizens of different countries of the world that they asked the President of Russia, and that the President of Russia answered this - he will bring it without “circumcisions”, off-screen texts and other disturbances beneficial to the interviewer.

And it seems that a harshly censored interview with Putin in the West has the opposite effect. Adequately-minded citizens are aware that the interview could not last the entire 10-11 minutes, and therefore various Internet sites in the same States have already published the full text of the conversation of the American blonde Kelly with the Russian president, and read the interview. And the same NBC and other fake-news with the stubbornness of a ram continue to beat their horns on the wall, on which they see their own shadow, but they draw pictures of what is “aggressive Russia” in front of them, ready to interfere in the elections, hackers to hack, and compromising on trump collect. Stop, paranoia! Or is it not treated? ..
Author:
Photos used:
NBCNews
54 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 7 June 2017 06: 50
    +15
    Black top, white bottom. How the American censorship arranged circumcision interview with the president of Russia
    yesterday snot smeared at Solovyov, about this ... indignation ...! one would like to ask: dear comrades, what were you waiting for? propaganda, it is propaganda. everyone’s ears ... pouring, and to us and to them, to each his own. arranged offenses ... kindergarten.
    1. Viktor Terkin
      Viktor Terkin 7 June 2017 08: 28
      +9
      Andrei Yuryevich, but you really don’t understand why it is necessary, as you put it, to pour snot? If not, then sorry.
      1. Viktor Terkin
        Viktor Terkin 7 June 2017 08: 35
        +16
        If you keep silent about this, then a simple Western columnist will have no chance at all to understand how much the image of our president and Russia as a whole is perverted to him.
        1. andj61
          andj61 7 June 2017 09: 11
          +8
          Quote: ViktorTerkin
          If you keep silent about this, then a simple Western columnist will have no chance at all to understand how much the image of our president and Russia as a whole is perverted to him.

          1. What do the words "simple western browser" mean? Maybe still a "viewer"? wink
          2. From the fact that they paid attention to this on Solovyov’s program, nothing will change for a simple Western TV viewer (as well as the observer) - they do not watch this program!
          But Internet resources are visited, the most advanced and RT can watch. There it is necessary to shift the center of gravity of the work on political education of the western man in the street. It is enough for us to report this as a fait accompli - and enough. There are other relevant topics for discussion. hi
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 7 June 2017 09: 13
      +16
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      pour, and to us and to them, to each his own. arranged offenses ... kindergarten.

      Namesake, you're wrong. It’s one thing to edit the interview, let’s say supplementing it with comments after, it’s another thing to edit the words of the president of the country and cut out the key pieces of his statements. And here I agree with Solovyov - they keep the mattress of the layman for cattle. Not a single professional journalist will do what this chicken has done.
      We also have propaganda, but our journalists who interviewed US presidents did not cut it (interviews), and did not turn it upside down, so that the layman somehow understood something wrong.
      1. ALLxANDr
        ALLxANDr 9 June 2017 13: 26
        0
        Well, as if I agree with you, but also with Andrei Yuryevich too - he is right in his own way! After all, the same Solovyov says the following: the Americans, not only do they provide their translator, but also agree on what to show and after. We do not do all this and leave everything to the conscience of a Western journalist. I draw attention to CONSCIENCE OF THE WESTERN JOURNALIST!

        And after that we’re offended ... because in the soul everyone knew that there would be something like that! In recent decades, it has always been like that, not really this time something had to change? !! I am not at all surprised. It was expected!
    3. DF70
      DF70 7 June 2017 09: 58
      +12
      Quote: Andrew Y.
      Black top, white bottom. How the American censorship arranged circumcision interview with the president of Russia
      yesterday snot smeared at Solovyov, about this ... indignation ...! one would like to ask: dear comrades, what were you waiting for? propaganda, it is propaganda. everyone’s ears ... pouring, and to us and to them, to each his own. arranged offenses ... kindergarten.

      censorship is censorship in africa.
      as is propaganda.
      Is it not so in Russia? on zomboyaschik only three topics:
      1. A conspiracy against Russia, there are only enemies around.
      2. How bad in Ukraine.
      3. Syria.
      And not a word about the huge problems in the economy, science, education in Russia.
      1. Disorder
        Disorder 7 June 2017 10: 59
        +7
        Everyone sees in the box only what he wants to see.
        1. Großer feldherr
          Großer feldherr 7 June 2017 11: 13
          +9
          Everyone sees in the box only what is shown to him, but only what is needed / can be shown there (the question is only to whom).
          1. Disorder
            Disorder 7 June 2017 13: 05
            +2
            laughing Well, it’s obvious that what they don’t show is impossible to see.
        2. bakhshiyan rachik
          bakhshiyan rachik 8 June 2017 08: 55
          0
          yes you shto what a shit. everything is democratic
      2. St Petrov
        St Petrov 7 June 2017 14: 12
        +6
        And not a word about the huge problems in the economy, science, education in Russia.


        Yes? yes, to you one devil everything will be small) few snot, little tin, little all lost

        insatiable characters. let snot go on the air every day - and you will say a little

        I have little news about the opening of factories and more. and nothing - I live. Although it would be possible to spend days spinning about new plants. Good built them.

        turn on the rain or rbk - enjoy. if you like the topic. there is no censorship in our state and this is a fact.

        each viewer will like. and this is also an obvious fact.

        1. DF70
          DF70 7 June 2017 16: 34
          +1
          Quote: c-Petrov
          And not a word about the huge problems in the economy, science, education in Russia.

          Yes? yes, to you one devil everything will be small) few snot, little tin, little all lost
          insatiable characters. let snot go on the air every day - and you will say a little
          I have little news about the opening of factories and more. and nothing - I live. Although it would be possible to spend days spinning about new plants. Good built them.
          turn on the rain or rbk - enjoy. if you like the topic. there is no censorship in our state and this is a fact.
          each viewer will like. and this is also an obvious fact.

          DO NOT distort. I mean news programs.
      3. Amurets
        Amurets 7 June 2017 15: 36
        0
        Quote: DF70
        And not a word about the huge problems in the economy, science, education in Russia.

        Another problem to solve, change the anthem, then everything will go as it should.
        The bill on the new anthem of Russia was submitted to the State Duma by deputies of the LDPR faction led by Mikhail Degtyarev
        , a REGNUM correspondent reports on June 7. The draft federal constitutional law proposes to approve the new State Anthem of the Russian Federation "God Save the Tsar!"
        REGNUM
        18:56
        Event Details
        1. staviator
          staviator 9 June 2017 10: 59
          +1
          - "Another problem to solve, change the anthem ...
          And the police back to the police wassat
      4. Parsec
        Parsec 7 June 2017 18: 55
        +1
        Quote: DF70
        And not a word about the huge problems in the economy, science, education in Russia.

        The rhetoric of Ukrainians has been unchanged since 1991.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Grigory_78
          Grigory_78 8 June 2017 09: 55
          0
          What does the Ukrainians have to do with it, if a person watches only news and talk shows ... It's like searching for oysters with wine sauce and a glass of Beaujolais to bypass the McDonald's. Maybe wiser someday.
      5. Grigory_78
        Grigory_78 8 June 2017 09: 50
        +2
        Quote: DF70
        And not a word about the huge problems in the economy, science, education in Russia.

        Of course, not as much as we would like, but they are discussing it. And you can find it if you wish. That's just the level it turns out such that the average person in five minutes of discussion will feel the desire to switch anywhere - at least to House-2, or even turn off the TV.
        It is easiest to find a Vesti FM - Khazin, Glazyev, Mikheev a competent economist invited to the "Iron Logic". It seems that they are trying to explain economic issues in a simple language, but all the same, brains are boiling.
        And the expert best expressed himself at the “Evening with Solovyov” - that they tried to imagine in our Senate that tomorrow they would find part of the gold reserves of the Russian Empire (in fact, a huge influx of money will happen) - will the current governance structure and economy allow us to direct the country's development so that as a result, this money was not stolen, but became new schools, factories, railways, modern roads. And they came to the conclusion that - no, nothing. Replenish the Reserve Fund - an easy, well-established mechanism. But to send and receive a powerful impetus to development in one's own economy is not.
        In addition, Khazin raised the question that without a change in domestic economic policy there will be further impoverishment of the population, and its change will be needed like air, but it will cause powerful opposition from the majority of the elite, which suits the current state of the economy, just give Crimea so that the sanctions are lifted - and in general, everything is fine, you can steal and sell the state further.
      6. Rey_ka
        Rey_ka 9 June 2017 14: 32
        0
        Start about the problems!
      7. rvRomanoff
        rvRomanoff 11 June 2017 14: 45
        0
        Judging by your comment, there really are problems in education. As for the article, the United States does not try to take the worst from the USSR, they only get rid of the democracy that is unnecessary after the assassination of the USSR.
  2. Alex66
    Alex66 7 June 2017 07: 27
    +3
    And what did Putin expect to play fair? Does he believe in principles of democracy? We must already enter into contracts with enormous penalties for such circumcisions. But we believe they are civilized.
    1. andrew42
      andrew42 7 June 2017 13: 21
      +1
      About contracts and rewards for circumcision is a good idea. And on a prepayment for a deposit! On deposit! Let the degenerates pay! With a black sheep even a shred of wool!
  3. 501Legion
    501Legion 7 June 2017 07: 30
    +3
    and they also say something about RT)
  4. ImPerts
    ImPerts 7 June 2017 07: 38
    +4
    By the way, about propaganda, the USSR and the rest.
    Excerpt from an article in LJ.
    It even became interesting (but I did not live at that time). This relates to the attitude of the CCP to the 20 congress of the CPSU:
    "... In the history of the Open Letters of the 1963 year, it is also curious that when the Chinese tried to distribute these texts in the USSR, by diplomatic mail and the Beijing-Moscow train, then all trains on the border in Zabaykalsk were thoroughly searched for the presence of texts, and they were seized. In the Soviet press, these answers were not published, unlike previous practice... ".
    http://periskop.livejournal.com/1070883.html
    An interesting article about China.
    1. tasha
      tasha 7 June 2017 09: 31
      0
      An interesting article about China.

      Very interesting. Thanks for the source.
  5. CYBERNINJA
    CYBERNINJA 7 June 2017 07: 55
    +8
    The American viewer is not so dumb as to believe their media. The Americans, especially with Russian roots, looked at the full version on the Internet ... But we don’t know their reaction to this fact ...
    1. g1washntwn
      g1washntwn 7 June 2017 08: 59
      +8
      Almost all mainstream fake news channels have news commenting disabled, the maximum is that you can repost to tweet and comment on your own pag, because it exposes these fake news very much and spoils the reputation of the channels very much.
      And your tweet with exposure will be read by three people (and those are FBI, NSA and CIA employees) and a cat, somewhere accidentally lying on the keyboard.
      Freedom of speech? Nooooo not seen.
    2. NEXUS
      NEXUS 7 June 2017 14: 27
      +4
      Quote: CYBERNINDJA
      But their reaction to this fact is not known to us ...

      1. CYBERNINJA
        CYBERNINJA 7 June 2017 15: 24
        0
        He turned to Putin, because of resentment on the channel and on this Kelly Maggie ... They say very strongly that he was angry. Film critics are nervous people, especially if they are from the states.
      2. ALLxANDr
        ALLxANDr 9 June 2017 14: 07
        +1
        I watched the video - thanks! This has somewhat changed the opinion of Americans in me. At least I respected this blogger, and not because he spoke pleasant words about Russia - the person just reasoned reasonably, trying to figure it out, looking for sources and finding them. That's why I shake his hand, because I myself am so.
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 9 June 2017 14: 30
          +1
          Quote: ALLxANDr
          I watched the video - thanks! This has somewhat changed the opinion of Americans in me. At least I respected this blogger, and not because he spoke pleasant words about Russia - the person just reasoned reasonably, trying to figure it out, looking for sources and finding them. That's why I shake his hand, because I myself am so.

          This man was in the Bush administration when he was. And he firmly believed that Russia is evil, and Russians are barbarians. There are many of his videos in YouTube ... called a memory pill. He watches our films, studies history, even Soviet cartoons enjoy watching ... and it is very interesting to watch how a person's opinion and outlook on many things change. Here is one of the videos ...
          1. ALLxANDr
            ALLxANDr 9 June 2017 16: 15
            +1
            Thank you) It is really interesting to observe how it was before, and how it became AFTER! hi
  6. Masya masya
    Masya masya 7 June 2017 07: 58
    +7
    Magin Kelly and the collective of the TV channel she represents acted as “ritual cutters”

    it would be naive to even expect the opposite ...
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 7 June 2017 08: 18
    +10
    It is clear that we simply had to “edit” and the GDP was ready for this. Remember the case of the German edition, when the same thing happened. True, then the GDP expressed its attitude to this, and this journalist is no longer a foot in the government offices. Probably for “Magin Kelly - black top, white bottom” it was the first and last meeting. And our media was even very worth indignant at the “freedom of speech” in the United States. After all, this is also an element of the information war.
  8. Viktor Terkin
    Viktor Terkin 7 June 2017 08: 39
    +5
    In my opinion, the author forgot to indicate the most important thing. The American journalist did not just cut the interview, she edited Putin’s answers. WITH
  9. Klim podkova
    Klim podkova 7 June 2017 08: 43
    +7
    Magin Kelly as a journalist committed suicide. There is no longer such a world "media star".
    1. cost
      cost 7 June 2017 12: 49
      +2
      Yes, complete. In Russia, it may be that she will become a “handed journalist,” but Russia is not the whole world. No work left
      I’m interested in something else. Did Trump look at the full, uncroped text of this interview?
  10. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 7 June 2017 09: 19
    +5
    It is necessary to work, and not give the interview left and right, then there will be nothing to cut off! - then Figaro, then Stone, now this woman is still ... I have nothing more to say on the topic
    1. Boris55
      Boris55 7 June 2017 12: 42
      +4
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      It’s necessary to work, not to give an interview

      This is precisely his job - to explain his policy to everyone. In the age of the Internet, 10imn is enough. in the media, so that an interested person would find it and look at it completely, but whoever cares, he won’t understand anything in an hour.
      Any word is management. A word spoken in the media controls millions. To ignore such opportunities is unforgivable stupidity. The opinion of millions of Americans will change, and US policy will change.
      1. DF70
        DF70 7 June 2017 16: 42
        0
        Quote: Boris55
        This is precisely his job - to explain his policy to everyone.

        Is that why they choose the president of the country?
        maybe he can start to fulfill his campaign promises, which is 17 !!!!! years old.


        Besides the army and partly foreign policy, what has been accomplished?
        1. Boris55
          Boris55 7 June 2017 18: 59
          0
          Quote: DF70
          maybe he can start to fulfill his campaign promises, which 17 !!!!! years.

          What is your grade in arithmetic? laughing
          Quote: DF70
          Besides the army and partly foreign policy, what has been accomplished?

          All.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. ALLxANDr
              ALLxANDr 9 June 2017 13: 39
              0
              Tell me, where and in which country did we overcome poverty, got rid of corruption? There are many countries in which retirees are not paid at all to hard workers!

              Here's an example:
              Pension in China is paid only to government officials, managers and people involved in industrial production. Residents of rural areas and peasants do not receive a pension at all.
              The average pension in China is 618 yuan (about $ 75) per month.
              There are no benefits for retirees in China.

              You raise eternal questions that will not be resolved even after 200 years! Or do you know how to resolve this issue?
  11. kunstkammer
    kunstkammer 7 June 2017 13: 06
    +2
    all the worst that at one time in the Soviet Union was, the modern West decided to take as a guide to action

    it means that what was supposedly the “worst” in the Soviet Union is actually very necessary and effective. Until now, no matter how hard modern "effective managers" of all stripes try, they cannot come up with the best. One of two things: either fall into paranoia or use the Soviet experience.
    "Long live created by the will of the peoples
    One, mighty Soviet Union! "
  12. igorserg
    igorserg 7 June 2017 13: 43
    0
    put on YouTube in the full version :)
  13. iouris
    iouris 7 June 2017 14: 05
    0
    The question is: why was it necessary to give an interview, was the goal achieved or not?
    1. Chernobrov's eyebrows
      Chernobrov's eyebrows 7 June 2017 15: 44
      +2
      What do you mean why? You do not need evidence that the US has problems with democracy?
      1. iouris
        iouris 7 June 2017 22: 57
        0
        Quote: Chernobrov's eyebrows
        You do not need evidence that the US has problems with democracy?

        I do not need. I suspect that you think democracy is the power of the people. Is it nothing that the term "democracy" originated in a slave society?
  14. tun5t
    tun5t 7 June 2017 14: 57
    +1
    The cause of the USSR is alive in the mass consciousness of Western nipples !! laughing
    1. iouris
      iouris 7 June 2017 23: 06
      +3
      Do not remember the USSR in vain. Soviet society is a product of development in the direction of the West (specifically the USA, remember: “We caught America by milk yield ...”?) And Western scientific thought. Please note that in the European Parliament a very strong, if not system-forming, function is performed by politicians from the former commonwealth of socialist states, in particular: Merkel, Tusk. They then well understand the importance of ideological struggle.
      In vain do you jerk, the USSR-it was a powerful project.
  15. Stinger
    Stinger 7 June 2017 15: 17
    +5
    The main thing is true. True in the West is done like this. The Pope arrives in Paris. The first free and independent correspondent runs to him at the plane’s ramp and asks: “How do you feel about brothels in Paris?” Dumbfounded, the Pope says: "But are there brothels in Paris?" In the evening, a newspaper comes out with a headline in arshin letters: "The first thing the Pope asked when he left the plane, was there any brothels in Paris!"
  16. Niccola Mack
    Niccola Mack 8 June 2017 09: 42
    +2
    Maybe it’s enough for our scam to play - how they put us on the media!
    Zakharova, however, indicated a wonderful method in her conversation how to stop this.
    It just puts its own camera and it shoots the entire interview.
    If you didn’t show part of the frames in an “exclusive” interview, everything is laid out on the Web. Only zhurnalyugi begin to grumble about "exclusivity" - instantly I get an answer - either this way or nothing.
    We agree to an interview with your competitors !!!
  17. nickname7
    nickname7 9 June 2017 11: 31
    +1
    Although they circumcised but showed something, it’s already progress, otherwise Zakharova said that Lavrov, like at the press conference, was crucified for 2 hours before Western journalists, and the BBC, when showing on TV, turned off the sound of Lavrov and the voiceover, said the opposite, said Lavrov.
    They are a sharpie and play with marked cards.
  18. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 9 June 2017 12: 41
    0
    Stop, paranoia! Or is it not being treated? ..

    why so? treated, though amputation.
  19. shura7782
    shura7782 9 June 2017 22: 45
    0
    I think that the GDP is not well prepared for the conversation. Moreover, I knew what questions they would ask. As a result, it turned out that he was sitting and making excuses. Also, he gave occasion to the leading to say about this. I did not like.