Western media deliberately distort the real situation in Syria

118
Alexei Pushkov, who heads the State Duma’s international affairs committee, believes that there are no grounds for the early resignation of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

During a press conference held on February 24 this year in Moscow, the deputy said that Assad’s possible departure was an artificially contrived situation. After talking with him, which lasted three hours, Pushkov did not get the feeling that Assad was ready to leave, since there is absolutely no reason for that.

Speaking about his impressions of a trip to Syria, Pushkov noted that the Western media created a one-sided picture that emphasizes the tragic, negative sides. In this regard, there is a feeling that the political regime of President Assad is under siege, and the majority of Syrians opposes his rule.

According to the head of the Duma committee, in fact the situation looks different. He acknowledged the existence in Syria of a serious internal confrontation between confessional and ethnic groups. At the same time, according to the deputy, the regime of B. Assad is supported by large sections of the population.
Pushkov said that when visiting Damascus there is tension, but it does not feel that “the city is on the verge of civil war or it is constantly shaken by some internal conflicts.” A.Pushkov added that the daily life of the city “looks normal and is not broken.

Speaking about the situation that has developed within the opposition movement in Syria, he noted that it is on the verge of a split. Most of the discrepancies, according to Pushkov, arise on the issue of a referendum on the adoption of a new Syrian constitution, which will be held 26 February this year. He stressed that now in Syria there is no cohesive center of the opposition, speaking on behalf of the protest-adjusted groups of the population.

A.Pushkov added that the State Duma will continue to study the real situation in Syria and will continue to work on a peaceful settlement in this country.
118 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Igor
    +3
    24 February 2012 19: 25
    Western media deliberately distort the real situation in Syria

    What insidious are these Western media !!!
    1. Aleksey67
      +20
      24 February 2012 19: 41
      Unfortunately, due to the fact that the world media is controlled by a certain number of people of "famous" nationality (did you violate anything? belay ) Russia is doomed to lose information wars. A modern "vegetable" is predisposed to "absorb" everything with 100% certainty that this is true, if it was said on the radio, shown on TV, printed in newspapers. Information from the Internet is not perceived as "straightforward"
      1. Igor
        +11
        24 February 2012 19: 55
        Quote: Aleksey67
        controlled by a certain number of people of "known" nationality


        This is not a nationality, this is a state of mind.

        Quote: Aleksey67
        Russia is doomed to lose the information war.


        Set aside defeatist moods.

        Quote: Aleksey67
        Information from the Internet is not perceived as "straightforward"


        After 10 years, the Internet will tear mankind from television, radio and newspapers.
        1. Aleksey67
          +3
          24 February 2012 20: 01
          Quote: Igorek
          Set aside defeatist moods.

          From the resources of Russia, only "Russia Today", which is not really allowed anywhere, so there are simply no information resources, and "who owns information, owns the world" is an unshakable axiom wink

          Quote: Igorek
          After 10 years, the Internet will tear mankind from television, radio and newspapers.


          Reminds "Moscow does not believe in tears", remember: "soon there will be no theaters or cinema, everything will be replaced by television" smile
          TV becomes 3D and + Internet connection with TV
          1. Igor
            +4
            24 February 2012 20: 16
            Quote: Aleksey67
            From the resources of Russia only "Russia Today", which is not really allowed anywhere


            You always need to start somewhere.

            Quote: Aleksey67
            "soon there will be no theaters or cinema, everything will be replaced by television"


            By and large, the way it is, low-income people almost never go to theaters, I myself was only in the theater once and when I served in the army they drove us there)))
            In general, I judge by my parents, when I came to visit them, I discovered that they had bought a second computer (laptop) and Wi-Fi Internet and were sitting there together.
          2. 0
            27 February 2012 19: 00
            Already revolution through the Internet are being made. The Internet, of course, can be detrimental to free states, and very strong. Recent events speak of this.
        2. +6
          24 February 2012 22: 18
          50-70 years ago it was also said that TV and cinema would kill the theater ........ killed? Internet for information, -the theater, radio and television newspapers -for the soul ..... :) wink
          1. +2
            25 February 2012 06: 50
            FREGATENKAPITAN, That's right ... Nobody will kill anything .. Everything will exist .... Russia does not lose the information war, Russia is simply outside the information space of the West ... People get only the information that plays into the hands of their own government .. .We laugh at the homeland of elephants, it seems like stupidity, but in the absence of other information already got a generation that is sure of the correctness of this story ... We need to infiltrate the information space with all the means that are available at the moment ... Not only technically, but and with the help, for example, of the ensemble im.Alexandrova or rock groups .. Any way ...
        3. +7
          24 February 2012 23: 44
          Quote: Igorek
          Set aside defeatist moods.
          - To be honest, then I have very few, albeit effective, but rare partisan attacks by Leontyev, Kurginyan, Shevchenko and others like them. These partisans have already proved their military talents, they need to be provided with an army for everyone. In terms of the media empire, precisely with the aim of waging hostilities on a systematic and powerful basis, broadcasting not only to Russia, but to the whole world. It is clear that this is a very expensive business, but the game is worth the candle. But such partisanism will not have much effect, even if the Leontievs, Kurginyans and Shevchenko will have at least seven spans on their foreheads. We need strong state support.
          We set aside defeatist moods, but we set this task for the future - we must
      2. stasyan
        -11
        24 February 2012 21: 35
        Putin tried to control the media, failed
        1. -2
          24 February 2012 22: 00
          As it happened, some talking heads on a box singing a great and powerful leader.
          1. +10
            24 February 2012 22: 05
            Quote: professor
            As it happened, some talking heads on a box singing a great and powerful leader.

            But today I just saw a talking head on the box that accused Putin of destroying (complete!) Freedom of speech! The head belonged to Ryzhkov, and this is far from Putin's adorer!
            1. -9
              24 February 2012 22: 20
              Have you started looking at the box for a long time? Before the elections, they suddenly began to show "opposition", a year ago, none of this happened.
              A typical news scenario on central television. The President met, visited, chided ... 30% of airtime; The prime minister met, visited, chided ... 30% of airtime; News but about what (in the village such and such a barn was built ...) 20%; and finally bad news from America / West / ... 20%.

              The only thing I don’t understand, why they didn’t close the Echo of Moscow, does not fit into the mainstream.
              1. +9
                24 February 2012 22: 40
                Professor,
                And why, in fact, the central television should show the opposition, which is barely enough to fill the air of "Echo of Moscow", I also don’t give money to my neighbor - everything is only to my wife, and what is not closed just confirms that we have freedom of speech exists, I would personally reduce it and many will agree with me
                1. -6
                  24 February 2012 22: 46
                  Just don’t laugh. Because media of a type independent of power and type of power can theoretically change every election. And because in the West the media broadcast the opposition and criticize the government. A fresh example is the German president who, due to criticism of the media, was dismissed.
                  1. +5
                    24 February 2012 23: 10
                    It is difficult to call Echo of Moscow independent - you have to manage to criticize the government while being supported by a government agency such as Gazprom.
                  2. +4
                    24 February 2012 23: 17
                    Professor,
                    Well, in my opinion Germany is a parliamentary republic and the president there is a purely representative figure, and then, for the sake of objectivity, you could remember what you criticized him for - the reason, to be honest, is ridiculous, so for a tick, like, these are how we are principled. very diverse, mainly CDU / CSU with SOCIAL DEMOCRATS and instead of our Zhirinovsky they (sorry, you) have greens (with the same result) and you "love" the Turks, but Russia is so simply "adored"
                    1. -1
                      24 February 2012 23: 36
                      They (the media) also "run into" the chancellor not childishly. I do not idealize the Western media, I know them from the inside, so to speak, but to paraphrase Churchl I will say: "The Western model of the media is bad, but no better one has yet been invented."

                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9M7egqcX90I
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHHrTp96yog&feature=related

                      here they are free media
                      Information program "Time" from 02.11.1977
                      1. +6
                        25 February 2012 04: 05
                        And here is other information. And which of them is right?
                        This is a debate about nothing. And after 08.08.08. Western media have discredited themselves, so I personally don’t believe them anymore and it’s unlikely that they will ever be rehabilitated.
                        http://mixednews.ru/archives/12491
                        http://mixednews.ru/archives/10767
                      2. +3
                        25 February 2012 07: 07
                        Quote: professor
                        They (the media) also "run into" the chancellor not childishly. I do not idealize the Western media, I know them from the inside, so to speak, but to paraphrase Churchl I will say: “The Western model of the media is bad, but I haven’t come up with a better one yet.
                        Buy more than half of the newspapers at the Russian kiosk and read which Putin, Medvedev are bad .. and why ... Not to mention the local administration, all the newspapers are here ... Do you think the categories of years on 10-15 are lagging behind the realities ... You do you think those who go to rallies in support of Putin are the trolls? Or people who succumb to the media, no .. For the most part, these are just the most thinking people .. who just see the result, which they did not dare to hope for ...
                  3. +1
                    25 February 2012 06: 47
                    You know, could not resist and laughed! laughing I look through the European news release and see how controlled the objectivity of the independent opinion of free Western media is! Well, according to a private example about the President of Germany, the old rocketer answered you exhaustively. In general, the trap of the press, controlled by 100%, by a Western political pack, reminds me more and more of a cunning dirty trickster, who, depending on the situation, is ready to talk about the same event in a diametrically opposite tone. But easier - prostitutes ...
                    1. +2
                      25 February 2012 07: 11
                      Quote: esaul
                      You know, could not resist and laughed!
                      Ay yay yay .. an adult uncle, but laughs on such a serious matter .. It’s just that the professor lives at the end of the 20, or, at best, at the very beginning of the 21 century .. So you are talking about different countries .. Although nothing is said about the Western media not changed ...
                  4. +2
                    25 February 2012 07: 02
                    Quote: professor
                    because media of a type independent of power and type of power can theoretically change every election. And because in the West the media broadcast the opposition and criticize the government. A fresh example is the German president who, due to criticism of the media, was dismissed.

                    Well, I laugh .. Do you really think that a fairy tale about independent media will work? What kind of independence can there be for a person who SELLS his opinion? This is the independence of a prostitute, well, they fuck me up, but I don’t like ... I just lease a body ... laughing The journalist, alas, is just a feather that a rich Pinocchio bought to break off the horns of his competitor with the help of cattle ... And he will serve the one who pays the most
                2. +2
                  25 February 2012 06: 39
                  Quote: Old Rocketman
                  And why, in fact, the central television should show the opposition, which is barely enough to fill the air of "Echo of Moscow", I also don’t give money to my neighbor - everything is only to my wife, and what is not closed just confirms that we have freedom of speech exists, I would personally reduce it and many will agree with me

                  Igor, I greet you, my friend! This is the only correct and, I believe, an exhaustive answer to such questions! Regarding all kinds of freedoms, it is time for the West to learn from Russia, given the results of the dispersal of Wall Street stormtroopers versus the Bolotnaya rallies.
              2. +2
                25 February 2012 06: 33
                Quote: professor
                You began to watch a box long ago?

                You know, I never stopped looking at the box, and I try not to focus only on the so-called. pro-government - thank God, the plate allows. Your link to a semblance of statistics. it is pure chatter or a burning desire to cast a shadow over the fence. To me it very vividly reminds me of exclamations like "fucking all the polymers" uttered without any particular concern to support these exclamations with specificity. Now I will sit down and keep track of the TV time allotted to pro-government and anti-government programs. I have nothing to do but engage in refutation of an openly provocative stuffing. Well, returning to 20% of the time for the negative in the West - if only 20 minutes were allotted, but, say, 40 minutes, then the screeching about the lack of objectivity in the Russian media would have been many times greater! And, of course - protection of freedom of speech. as well as sexual minorities - the sacred cow of Western propaganda!
              3. +3
                25 February 2012 06: 57
                Quote: professor
                Before the elections, they suddenly began to show "opposition", a year ago, none of this happened.
                Do not talk nonsense ... They always showed all this opposition .. The people laughed and then discussed all these marches of dissenting, not loving, not drinking and other .. And more than that, they didn’t really do anything in the country ... They just buzzed in Moscow and, sometimes, in St. Petersburg..Stacks of silly boys from the nearest vocational schools ....
            2. +6
              24 February 2012 23: 03
              Quote: esaul
              The head belonged to Ryzhkov, and this is far from Putin's adorer

              Hi Valera, I heard too, he also called him an earthworm drinks
              1. 0
                25 February 2012 06: 50
                Quote: Old Rocketman
                Hi Valera, I heard too, he also called him an earthworm

                Fireworks again, Igor! "So he called him an earthworm! ..." am drinks
              2. +1
                25 February 2012 07: 14
                Quote: Old Rocketman
                , I also heard, he also called him an earthworm

                Quote: Old Rocketman
                , I also heard, he also called him an earthworm
                Eh ... you didn’t fully watch the transmission of such a cool guy ... And also a green frog drinks good
        2. +1
          25 February 2012 06: 53
          Quote: Stasyan
          Putin tried to control the media, failed

          Is it such a conclusion on which such a conclusion is made? Putin makes excellent use of administrative resources ... Yes, and you just don’t need control over all the media ... You need to correctly respond to real attacks and distinguish serious opponents from trolls ...
      3. +1
        25 February 2012 06: 24
        Alexei, what about us? How are you? And a lot of people in other countries who write balanced articles and correctly assess the situation? Not everything is so gloomy .... Syria and IRan are holding on because there are not only vegetables, but and fruits ... lol
    2. +7
      24 February 2012 21: 24
      They control the media and education! And they must be driven from there by a filthy broom !!! You need to start from our country and continue in the CIS and beyond, to bribe, plant, etc ... (I'm not an extremist and not an Anglo-Saxon hater) !!! But you need to know one thing - the killer is the one who kills the body, but three times the killer is the one who kills the soul !!!! The financial elite of the Anglo-Saxons and Jews will kill the whole world.
      1. +3
        24 February 2012 21: 31
        We haven’t heard anything new for ourselves ... Just one more opinion, one more thinking person, for whom the fate of a friendly country is not indifferent.
      2. -1
        25 February 2012 04: 04
        A.A. Schicklgruberu: "... every German has his own," good ", Jew ...".
        Yes.
        The difference is Ukrainian - 1111; Jew -11; - understand?
        What kind of people are we, are all deceiving us?
        1. +1
          25 February 2012 07: 01
          This is what emerges from today's palette of news releases - in relation to the formation of Western public opinion, there are tendencies to soften the militant rhetoric towards Syria and Iran! Let's go to the "bazaar" about the possibilities of solving existing problems by peaceful means, with the involvement of all interested parties! Despite the relentless pressure, a "sooma" is being prepared for bedding in case the West has to plop on its ass if the Middle East ventures fail. Moreover, calls of this kind are heard with enviable regularity and increasing, in contrast to previous calls to resolve all issues, exclusively, by force. So, even on Iran - the Yusovskaya intelligence service admitted that the Iranian nuclear program has a purely peaceful character! Funny! ... laughingUS Confirms Peaceful Iranian Nuclear Program

          The latest report on the Iranian nuclear program, prepared jointly by 16 US intelligence services, postulates that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons, writes The Los Angeles Times. According to the publication, scouts came to the conclusion that such studies were discontinued back in 2003.

          At the same time, the document says that Tehran intends to achieve a level of knowledge that will allow it to create a bomb if necessary. The drafters of the report also note that Israel fully agrees with its main provisions and conclusions.

          Earlier, Iranian officials and religious leaders have repeatedly said that their country's nuclear program is exclusively peaceful. The last such statement was made by the supreme leader - Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. According to him, not even using, but simply possessing nuclear weapons is "a huge sin." At the same time, however, he noted that Iran will continue scientific research in this area "despite the sanctions, threats and pressure."

          Despite all this, Israel’s official position is that Iran’s nuclear research should be stopped at all costs. Jewish leaders say that if sanctions and diplomatic pressure do not stop Tehran, the only way out is to strike at nuclear facilities.

          American officials generally share Israel's concerns, but stress that the war against Iran could drag on and lead to unpredictable consequences. Israel believes that this position "serves Iranian interests."

          According to US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, the Israelis can independently strike Iran’s nuclear facilities in late spring or early summer this year.
  2. moldavan
    +13
    24 February 2012 19: 26
    A very intelligent man, I always look at PS, in politics he will be a big judge, REAL STATE
    1. Nymp
      +5
      24 February 2012 19: 40
      Quote: moldavan
      A very intelligent man, I always look at PS, in politics he will be a big judge, REAL STATE

      I agree! "Postscript" on the TVC channel is one of my favorite programs I recommend!
  3. Sarus
    +10
    24 February 2012 19: 31
    Remember 2008 ...
    The insidious and cruel Russia attacked a friendly and free Georgia ..
  4. +5
    24 February 2012 19: 35
    He stressed that now in Syria there is no cohesive center of the opposition, speaking on behalf of protest-minded groups of the population.

    however, there are Western intelligence agencies that would catch Bashar’s dozens and present to the world with shame as active destabilizers of the situation
    1. +1
      24 February 2012 23: 53
      For this, Fradkov was declared there - the local special services are weak for serious counteraction to MI-6, MOSSAD, the CIA and others. Therefore, it doesn’t work to catch much. This must be done by a very serious counterintelligence and counter-diversion special operation. Here the heirs of the famous SMERSH would cope, I'm not talking about the Syrian secret services
  5. +7
    24 February 2012 19: 40
    And where is she boasted western freedom of speech? Western media are controlled by anti-people, in fact, pseudo-democratic regimes.
    1. +9
      24 February 2012 19: 50
      Nick About the one vaunted free word. This is the same as good night babies. So that people think that they can say everything. And in fact. Try to say something against the parrhats. A recent example, German President Wulf caught hold of media outlets controlled by Moses descendants and devoured him for three months.
      1. +12
        24 February 2012 20: 07
        We are in the Baltic states, in my case in Estonia we do this, watch Russian news, then Russian oriented to the Baltic states (the first Baltic channel) after the local ones (Estonian) and finally Euronews ... the truth is born in the dispute!
        1. +4
          24 February 2012 23: 13
          I agree. For objectivity, you need to look at all the sources. And bring out the facts. Comparing the facts (for example, that there are no palm trees in Moscow, but they are in Greece), you can understand who is lying in the next story ...
      2. +4
        24 February 2012 21: 23
        All in. am Sergeant Ray Bradley wants to execute for freedom of speech. Here it is crap in action.
        1. +3
          24 February 2012 21: 27
          Quote: Sandov
          Ray Bradley wants for freedom of speech executes

          Yes, I just watched the story in the news ....... it looks like a nerd laughing BUT! .. movements made like a man! good .. It’s a pity I don’t completely know the whole background. feel
      3. +2
        25 February 2012 04: 14
        Heinrich!

        And Dominic Strauss-Kahn, in general: an African-European pimp.
      4. +2
        25 February 2012 11: 49
        The media simply shape public opinion among people who do not want to think. In the case of Woolf, I will never believe that a journalist suddenly took and remembered a private loan. Just someone wanted to take his place and, owning a certain info, merged it in time. The process has begun. And for the media, the main thing is RATING. Then to worry about the fate of the person who came under the distribution, it is not in their rules.
        1. 0
          25 February 2012 22: 58
          Quote: sedoj
          Then to worry about the fate of the person who came under the distribution, it is not in their rules.

          Of course, dear Yuri, this can adversely affect their digestion and sleep.
      5. 0
        25 February 2012 22: 54
        Quote: Heinrich Ruppert
        The latest example, the German President Wulf caught on to the media controlled by the Moses descendants and devoured him for three months.

        I understand your indignation, dear Henry, the world financial elite is trying to manipulate the whole World.
  6. +7
    24 February 2012 19: 43
    Western media bully Here, all the points have been set for a long time. They completely opened themselves with a screech in South Ossetia. And wondering, it makes no sense to freak out ... We all know where the wind is blowing and who in real life drives the media. do something like that.
  7. Owl
    +4
    24 February 2012 19: 44
    Ideological preparation for the introduction of troops (LAS, NATO or some kind of "sovereign" countries) into Syria, with the aim of overthrowing Assad, depriving Iran of an ally, preparing for active actions against Iran.
  8. Nymp
    +5
    24 February 2012 19: 45
    Very sensibly and briefly said the main thing! After such a talented political scientist as Pushkov, there is nothing to add! I would like to emphasize that one-sided coverage of the political picture in the Western media is already a strong tradition!
    1. +4
      24 February 2012 21: 27
      According to the head of the Duma committee, in fact the situation looks different. He acknowledged the existence in Syria of a serious internal confrontation between confessional and ethnic groups. At the same time, according to the deputy, the regime of B. Assad is supported by large sections of the population.
      Pushkov will not let me lie, I respect him as a person and a journalist.
  9. +4
    24 February 2012 19: 59
    It's not about the one-sidedness of coverage, gentlemen, we understand perfectly well that there is an information war, which, unfortunately, we are losing. The average person will think like a zombie tells him only because there are few other sources of information. If you turn off everything except the first channel on TV, and on it to drive that with RPG 7 you can easily bring down F-22 I'm sure at 100 percent that every second figure who pulls the brace will appear smile War, although it is informational, is war, God forbid our specialists master this profile
    1. Nymp
      +4
      24 February 2012 20: 04
      Quote: older
      War, although it is informational, is war, God forbid our specialists master this profile

      Actually, my opinion is parallel, and the first bastion in the information war should be the Internet space, for each of their desu five adequate inf.
  10. +7
    24 February 2012 20: 00
    There is nothing surprising in the line of Western media, moreover, their clone-offs are enough in the "independent press" of our countries! Even today, I see a picture - on some channels, the opposition has the status of "opposition, anti-government forces", on others "heroes of the rebels." So it was during the active events in the Caucasus, and in August 2008, there were two positions in Ukraine, and two delegations - one (from the "orange") to the battle formations of the Georgian army, the other (from the "blue") to South Ossetia!
    What are the political views, sources of funding, such is the execution of the order.
  11. sahha
    +4
    24 February 2012 20: 06
    It has long been known about these Western media that something does not suit the West here is the same stream of misinformation or its one-sided vision. And the Russian media have a minimum of information, even when it concerns Russia itself.
    So it’s interesting for me: when will the information war be evaluated as a powerful tool in upholding any interests of the Country?
  12. +12
    24 February 2012 20: 13
    Anegdot about information.
    Two Jews are scolding in the market
    First Moishe you are a fool.
    Second Izzy you.
    First moishe dick
    Second izya you poz
    Then Moishe climbs a barrel and screams at the whole market
    Izi has a daughter of a curvy ..... People stopped at the bazaar.
    Second time. Izi has a daughter of Kurva ... people were silent around.
    The third time. Izi has daughters of kurva and gets off the barrel
    Moisha stands and says the most respectable, I have no daughters.
    Izya in reply ...... and now try to prove it to people ...
    1. +5
      24 February 2012 22: 20
      Heinrich ruppert,
      This is an illustration of the first, attacking, postulate of any information war, but not everyone understands that to protect an audience from false successful propaganda is rather possible not by increasing reciprocal, but by increasing the ability to critically perceive it. That is, to increase the level of education and at the same time provide access to the truthful (necessary ) information, there is a need for strict state control over the upbringing and education of the younger generation, at the age of 20 a person is ideologically formed and remodeling it is extremely difficult. Counter-propaganda is needed, but immunity to a hostile one is more important
      1. 0
        25 February 2012 04: 24
        old rocketman,.
        ... and an increase in the ability to critically perceive it ..

        Danger to those holding power.
      2. +1
        25 February 2012 07: 16
        Quote: Old Rocketman
        Counter-propaganda is needed, but hostile immunity is more important

        Igor, wonderful said! good The most amazing thing is how, even here on the forum, the guys rush to discuss and condemn the provocative stuffing! how many opinions, mutual insults ...! Guys! Do not forget that there is a full-blown INFORMATION WAR! And any exclamation of yours (made even out of good intentions!), Is added on by the fifth column, automatically, to the asset of their propaganda efforts! fool
        1. +2
          25 February 2012 10: 41
          Therefore, guys, we ourselves must begin with our children. Engaged in them to blow them all the information that we know. Feel free to give examples from our lives where we made mistakes. This is the best example for children. And it works beautifully. In disputes with others crush incontrovertible evidence. To do this, they themselves must help each other prompt, correct. And do not score immediately. As regretted, sdes sometimes happens. And you need more humor. A good Indus has more effect than hitting.
          1. +2
            25 February 2012 11: 33
            Heinrich, you shouldn't think so that - they are stupidly slaughtered. And minus signs are not because of stupid and unjustified anger, but because of differences of opinion. So, accordingly, who is gaining an excessive number of negative reviews. can. need to look at your beliefs differently? Nui about "Start with yourself" - for me it's like brushing your teeth in the morning. Best regards, Esaul. drinks
  13. sahha
    +4
    24 February 2012 20: 21
    Izya in response ...... and now try to prove to people ...- absolutely true.
  14. Scholarships
    +2
    24 February 2012 20: 27
    also a war. let informational.

    Nimp, you can invent a lot of things. but the truth is she is always alone;)
    1. Aleksey67
      +7
      24 February 2012 20: 33
      Quote: Becas
      also a war. let informational.


      In the 90s, we succumbed to the "drunkenness of democracy" and asked ... whether a generation. Remember these "horrible revelations" of Stalinism and the crimes of "communism" and denigration of the Army, Navy, imperialism, genocide of other peoples, etc. and so on, and all this was written in Russian newspapers by Russian journalists. Moreover, in parallel, articles were written about the beauty of democracy, the care of capital governments for their citizens.
      Thanks to that "bacchanalia" a generation has grown that calls Russia "this country", without serving a single day they are sure that "terrible grandfathers will immediately beat off their kidneys", and drunken officers will reket and drive "to build general's dachas."
      This is an occasion to understand the importance of information wars. According to information in the Western media, simple hard workers from abroad make up their minds about Russia and the Russians.
    2. +3
      24 February 2012 23: 40
      Scholarships,
      Quote: Becas
      though she is always alone;)

      Nope, everyone has their own truth, the truth is one, but to get to it, sometimes, is simply impossible
      1. +2
        25 February 2012 07: 22
        Aleksey67,
        old rocketman,
        This morning, thanks to you guys, I got a positive charge! Thank you, guys! drinks
  15. Coba
    +6
    24 February 2012 20: 38
    Europe sang "God bless Putin ..." what
    1. +4
      24 February 2012 20: 48
      laughing let them rehearse. laughing
  16. +5
    24 February 2012 20: 44
    Alexey 67- Absolutely true according to the information that the media give. And when you start talking normally with them and tell how it really is.
    and after a while you talk again, then a completely different conversation. Something for something against. But before you is another person. After that, he himself begins to search for information and verify it. Something like something no. PS: So that I liked everything, it wasn’t possible yet, but 60-70% positive result
  17. -6
    24 February 2012 20: 56
    Pushkov said that when visiting Damascus there is tension, but it does not feel that “the city is on the verge of civil war or it is constantly shaken by some internal conflicts.” A.Pushkov added that the daily life of the city “looks normal and is not broken.


    Bravo!!! He would have gone to Holmes, and then said "everything is calm in Baghdad."
    1. Aleksey67
      +8
      24 February 2012 21: 24
      Quote: professor
      Bravo!!! He would have gone to Holmes, and then said "everything is calm in Baghdad."


      Professor, you were above this, why distort the facts? wink Pushkov speaks about Damascus, where he was and spoke about his impressions.
      Then we still need to figure out who is "muddying the waters", well, beat me, but I don't believe that "peaceful demonstrators" can overwhelm so many professionals. Even deserters, they do not desert with zinc 30-60 cartridges, and shooting in long bursts, cartridges obviously do not save.
      1. -6
        24 February 2012 22: 10
        Pushkov speaks about Damascus, where he was and spoke about his impressions

        If he declared objectivity for the sake of that everything is calm in Damascus, and he does not know about other places, then I would have no complaints against him. And so from his words it turns out that the Western media are lying about the massacre in Syria.

        Then you have to figure out who is "muddying the water"

        The Saudis muddy the water there, not the West.
        1. +4
          24 February 2012 23: 28
          But what about the Qatari and British special forces? Isn't Britain the West?
          1. -5
            24 February 2012 23: 40
            Where are the British prisoners? The rebels of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards from Iran captured ...
            1. +3
              25 February 2012 04: 07
              Yesterday they showed honest western journalists, they write boiling water with fear.
        2. +2
          25 February 2012 07: 29
          Quote: professor
          The Saudis muddy the water there, not the West.

          By the way, in today's news release of "Euronews" there was information that the Saudis refused to participate in the further meeting of the so-called. "Friends of Syria" because of the futility of this event ... An interesting twist. What is hidden behind such a quirk and how this news is presented ... I do not ask - I am thinking ... recourse
    2. +2
      24 February 2012 23: 29
      He spoke of Damascus; he did not speak of Homs. Where is the contradiction in his words?
  18. Letekha
    +6
    24 February 2012 21: 07
    Unfortunately, even the Ukrainian media are not just democratic, but real corrupt ones, a copy of all sorts of CNN, plus their ridiculous praises of Yanukovych!
  19. Born in USSR
    +11
    24 February 2012 21: 16
    We need to take control of our own media and the Internet, deal with grant-aid programs and various sucking public organizations, organize our service of ideological and counter-ideological struggle, in general, it’s time to work out an ideology around which a large part of society could rally, and spread it at least to the territory of the CIS, to get the oligarchs to buy foreign media (since they already buy sports clubs) and through them draw their own line, convey the truth to the Zapadensky stupefied inhabitants, and attack, and not defend, beat them with their own weapons ...
    1. +4
      24 February 2012 22: 26
      Born in USSR,
      Super. Correctly determined the direction of the struggle. feel
  20. Coba
    +5
    24 February 2012 21: 20
    Late! The media, as well as the power grasping the dollar with your teeth, cannot be pulled by your legs, unless your head comes off.
    1. +4
      25 February 2012 07: 38
      You know, Ivan, - Khodorkovsky, Berezovsky, Gusinsky, Smolensky, Luzhkov and so on. there was a crap. absolutely convinced of its omnipotence and jurisdiction ... Already for the fact that GDP freed the country from THESE leeches, he already needs to say thanks for that. good
  21. +7
    24 February 2012 21: 20
    It would be surprising if the Western media served interests different from those of the world financial and media "elite", however, to the Russian media.This applies no less, but to the issue of the "Internet" ... The names are Gates, Zuckerberg, etc. etc. talk about anything. Well, the goyim also need to quietly bleed off steam, so that they would not be drawn to the pogroms.
  22. 755962
    +4
    24 February 2012 21: 38
    B. Assad's regime is supported by large segments of the population.
    People want peace! And the West longs for blood .. THE TRUTH! Only truth will save the people of Syria. Open your eyes to the masses. Mute the pro-Western media.
  23. +3
    24 February 2012 21: 45
    The main thing is that we do not hawala what the Western media is preparing. The poison is rare. For stupid Americans just right.
    1. Aleksey67
      +8
      24 February 2012 21: 52
      Quote: SF93
      For stupid Americans just right.


      I quote again the words of old man Bzdezhinsky

      I am very worried about the problem of education in our country. Yes, we are a democracy trying to survive in a complex world by pursuing a sound foreign policy. But this is possible provided that the people living in our country are also intelligent and sane. Otherwise, we will not be able to carry out the tasks before us.

      Forced to admit the American people are extremely ignorant. He has absolutely no idea about the outside world. There is no such subject in our public schools: world history. We teach children a very patriotic American history. But in fact, it is an embellished "Christmas" story, far from the complex and contradictory realities of the past. Take, for example, the relationship with the indigenous people of America - the Indians. It is a shame, but we must admit that the first ethnic cleansing "in the name of the Law" took place on American soil! Thousands of Indians were expelled from their lands under President Jackson ... And take geography. We do not teach it! Approximately 52% of current college students cannot show where New York is on the map. 70% of those entering higher education institutions in the 2003-2010s could not find Iraq - the country with which we fought! Somehow, future students were asked to identify a certain large territory, painted on the map in blue. So, 30% of them could not determine that it was the Pacific Ocean...
      1. +4
        24 February 2012 23: 18
        Wow, did the old fart betray this - for admitting this, this enemy is worthy of respect.
    2. +2
      24 February 2012 23: 37
      Quote: SF93
      For stupid Americans just right.

      Fortunately for us, not everyone there is there, there are sound heads who do not want to be sixes. Recently I saw a photo of George W. Bush with 2 soldiers - veterans of the Iraqi or Afghan companies. The thought arose - it’s easy for Bush to chat about democracy - it’s not to fight for democracy. I am glad that not everyone is ready to die there for loud slogans.
      PS These veterans in the picture have one prosthesis instead of both legs, the other instead of one ...
  24. Coba
    +7
    24 February 2012 21: 48
    I'm afraid the truth has appeared on the leg of the Dagestan boy, written by the suras from the Koran: - "If you saw what I see, tears would flow from your eyes in an endless stream." God is outside of time, He sees the past and the future equally.
  25. +5
    24 February 2012 22: 00
    Yesterday, our pro-Banderite Channel 5 reported that American and French journalists were killed in the bombing of Homs by the government army. The Khvrantsuzy called it a murder, Cameron made an accusatory speech, by the way, against the background, according to Haig shaking his head, in general one confirmation of the "crimes of Assad's bloody regime" disappeared. And how the earth holds such "non-people". Horror! smile
    1. +7
      24 February 2012 22: 48
      VikVik741,
      Well, yes, today the homeless got drunk on brakes and died, and tomorrow all the media shout that the Automotive Industry is poisoning civilians
    2. +7
      24 February 2012 22: 56
      "... brutally shot down our planes that peacefully bombed their cities ..."
  26. TULSKIY CAMOBAP
    0
    24 February 2012 22: 02
    The article is not about anything, everyone knew it very well, if anyone didn’t know then they knew.
  27. +2
    24 February 2012 22: 10
    Quote: VikVik741
    Yesterday, our pro-pro-Bandera "Channel 5" reported

    This channel belongs to Poroshenko, only yesterday proposed by Yanukovych, to the government of Azarov! I don’t understand anything, in the principles and direction of this team!
    1. +4
      24 February 2012 22: 35
      But what is incomprehensible, they are enemies in public, and behind the screens they kiss the gums. Loot is in some banks.
  28. Coba
    +6
    24 February 2012 22: 15
    Yes varaquinews, according to their Euronews showed a French journalist
    embracing a company of armed "mujahideen", this was the last
    filming before the bomb covered the "civilian population".
    1. +5
      25 February 2012 00: 09
      Quote: Coba
      Yes Vraquinews, in their language Euronews showed a French journalist hugging a company of armed "mujahideen", this was the last shooting before the bomb covered the "civilian population".
      - I remember that in the second Chechen large gang group, marching from the Pankisi Gorge, came under heavy fire from Russian helicopters. This large group was ground in a few minutes (well, there are helicopters, there are serious things), and there was one bearded man with a red beard among the corpses. It turned out that the English special correspondent. Aeglichans were also indignant for a long time, until the Foreign Ministry explained to them that penetration into the territory of Russia without the appropriate permits and visas of competent Russian authorities is a crime, and therefore it’s to blame.
      Here is a completely similar story. How did they get there? Why did the Syrian authorities not know anything about these journalists? Why is there no entry visa? Why were you in the company of terrorists and bandits? There are many questions, no answers ...
  29. +4
    24 February 2012 22: 20
    One channel weighs approximately like one ICBM of the RF Armed Forces ......................................... .... wink
    1. +2
      24 February 2012 22: 51
      FREGATENKAPITAN,
      I understand correctly, not in kilograms? drinks
  30. +2
    24 February 2012 22: 34
    It’s time to get used to it ...
    Western media have long been under the control of the United States and its hangers-on ...
    It is necessary to look between frames and lines ... smile
  31. Nechai
    +5
    24 February 2012 22: 48
    Quote: Tatanka Yotanka
    Syria does not now have a cohesive center of the opposition, speaking on behalf of protest-minded groups.

    And there is! Already in Tunisia. And the progressive world community, permission to say, ALREADY recognized the SNA as the only legitimate authority in Syria ...
    Quote: Reks
    . It is a pity I do not completely know the whole background.

    Yes, it sucks for the amers with the observance of the secrecy regime, so the sergeant poured information into WikiLeaks about the valiant Yankees in Afghanistan and Iraq. He was muttered for 2 years, up to and including procedural methods "Who do you work for? Speak!" And he told them the middle fingers on both hands, in response. The trial began. Or life-long, or VMN.
    Quote: Nymp
    for each their disu five adequate inf.

    And it’s not just misinformation, but turning to inappropriate values. Just not Posner $ K. these mediocrities are all about again ... In general, they will eat denyuzhki, senseless.
  32. Drugar
    0
    24 February 2012 22: 51
    An ambiguous feeling leaves the article ....
    [quote] After talking with him (Assad), which lasted three hours, Pushkov did not have the feeling that Assad was ready to leave ... [/ quote]

    The fact that Assad was "not ready to leave" was understandable.


    [/ quote] He (Pushkov) recognized the existence in Syria of a serious internal confrontation between religious and ethnic groups. [/ quote]
    Note that he acknowledged the existence of a serious confrontation in the country, although he noted [quote] ... that the Western media create a one-sided picture that emphasizes the tragic, negative sides. [/ Quote] Emphasizing the negative is certainly bad, but what positive can be found in the civil war?
    [quote] A. Pushkov added that the daily life of the city (Damascus) "looks normal and is not disturbed." [/ quote]
    Damascus is the capital all the same, if order is not established there, the Syrian army is worthless.
    In general, the article does not inspire the feeling that everything is in order in Syria. The situation, apparently, is really serious, so much that even A Pushkov could not embellish. [Quote] [/ quote] [quote] [/ quote]
  33. Drugar
    -1
    24 February 2012 23: 01
    An ambiguous feeling leaves the article ....
    After talking with him (Assad), which lasted three hours, Pushkov did not have the feeling that Assad was ready to leave ...


    The fact that Assad was "not ready to leave" was understandable.

    He (Pushkov) recognized the existence of a serious internal confrontation between religious and ethnic groups in Syria

    Note that he recognized the existence of a serious confrontation in the country, although he noted
    ... that the Western media are creating a one-sided picture that emphasizes the tragic, negative aspects.


    Emphasizing negativity is certainly bad, but what positive can be found in a civil war?

    A. Pushkov added that the daily life of the city (Damascus) "looks normal and is not disturbed"



    Damascus is the capital all the same, if order is not established there, the Syrian army is worthless.
    In general, the article does not inspire the feeling that everything is in order in Syria. The situation, apparently, really serious, so much that even A Pushkov could not embellish.
  34. +6
    24 February 2012 23: 17
    You guys "scold euronews". So in the west this is the "most truthful channel". Compared to the rest of the "fighters for democracy and freedom." It is not possible to watch other channels without a tab at all
    1. +5
      24 February 2012 23: 58
      Constantly watching ...
      It is truthful as a Discovery channel and simply keeps silent a lot about what the West does not like ...

      ZY
      It’s especially cool to look at Discovery as the Allies fought in Europe, but the USSR generally sideways, think about some tank fuss near Prokhorovka, the battle for a bridge or dam is cooler ...
      1. +4
        25 February 2012 01: 08
        mr.Man You and I both laugh at them as they distort history.
        1. +1
          25 February 2012 07: 46
          Heinrich ruppert,
          mr.Man,
          You are mistaken, others! Judging by the comments on this thread, your humor is understood and shared by almost everyone! drinks
  35. hramckov2012
    0
    25 February 2012 00: 37
    and our media are doing what. and in general, isn't the media created to be the heralds of power. so it is naive to expect something objective from them. we know "who is dancing the girl"
  36. OlegPatriot
    +2
    25 February 2012 01: 06
    There is an opinion that the media are not truly free and it does not matter which country they work in, however, many journalists in the West very often reveal the truth themselves, it is not in the interests of their own or another state .. as a result, they are in disgrace. And this only says that free media do not exist, there are only a few precedents in favor of freedom of speech ...
  37. andrejsavas
    +7
    25 February 2012 02: 00
    Good afternoon, good people. I live in Europe and follow all the events in Syria, watch N-24, Euronews and Russia 24 every day. Every day in the Western media they write what a bad government is in Syria, but I remember one day in German news where from the same source there were two news about Syria. The first is that the Syrian opposition consists of al-Qaeda fighters and the second news is that the Syrian authorities must necessarily transfer the power to the opposition. Western people have become so dark that even al-Qaeda is supported in order to only achieve their goals or they are not at all developed and do not understand what they are writing or saying. That's terrible ! Sorry for the Siriisk people and not the wine people.
    1. +1
      25 February 2012 07: 54
      Andrey, I welcome you. In my opinion, the information coming from these guys. how are you. very necessary and important here - on the forum. Thanks. And don't forget "come in". It is very interesting to know the perception of the concoction by the Western media by its main consumer. Good luck to you! drinks
  38. +2
    25 February 2012 02: 49
    Everything new is well forgotten old.
    And now we look at the history (Wikipedia) (Munich agreement):
    “The rejection of the Sudetenland was only the beginning of the process of the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia.
    Poland took part in the partition of Czechoslovakia: on September 21, 1938, in the midst of the Sudeten crisis, Polish leaders presented the Czechs with an ultimatum to "return" to them the Cieszyn region, where 80 thousand Poles and 120 thousand Czechs lived. On September 27, a repeated demand was voiced. Anti-Bohemian hysteria was whipped up in the country. On behalf of the so-called "Union of Silesian Insurgents" in Warsaw, recruitment to the Cieszyn Volunteer Corps was quite open. Detachments of "volunteers" were then sent to the Czechoslovak border, where they staged armed provocations and sabotage, and attacked weapons depots. Polish planes violated the Czechoslovak border every day. Polish diplomats in London and Paris advocated an equal approach to solving the Sudeten and Cieszyn problems, while the Polish and German military, meanwhile, were already agreeing on a line of demarcation of troops in the event of an invasion of Czechoslovakia. Day after day with the conclusion of the Munich agreement, September 30, Poland sent another ultimatum to Prague and, simultaneously with German troops, introduced its army into the Cieszyn region, the subject of territorial disputes between it and Czechoslovakia in 1918-1920. Left in international isolation, the Czechoslovak government was forced to accept the terms of the ultimatum "
    A prosperous country was hunted down by the media and ultimatums.
    "Left in international isolation, the Czechoslovak government was forced to accept the terms of the ultimatum."
    The methods are sometimes very old and proven.
    The goals are slightly different, but the impression is that we are returning to the times of politics before the Second World War.
    The USSR at that time was considered a strong but not the strongest power - as now Russia and some countries interfered with some plans of the world behind the scenes (like Czechoslovakia) and were simply morally destroyed.
    Again some "friends of Czechoslovakia" gathered and made sinister plans against this country.
  39. +3
    25 February 2012 03: 17
    Well, the "Russians" (I do not mean the nation, but self-determination ..., Tatar-Chukchi or some other Mordvin, for the West he is still Russian, and if someone in Russia thinks otherwise, then you better reconsider your nationalism: we are all Russians, do not "pour water on the mill" for the sake of the West splitting the country, they still dream that the Russians only stay in Muscovy ...) the media has always been weak for external information, and after perestroika and that is to say, subsequent democracy: pleasebut, and "West" was taboo, well, and still follow the same line by inertia, especially the yellow press and other pink ...
    From Russia, the first and second TV channel goes down and with its own amendments for the broadcast countries (via satellite, the same information for Germany and Estonia was presented differently ... / watched, but did not fix /)
    The Latvian (Latvian) media believes that in Russia, in general, everything is seam and soon it will end, and the states are the savior of everything and everything ...
    And here is Syria ...
    Where is it on the globe of America?
    1. +2
      25 February 2012 04: 36
      mr.ManAnd then Syria ...
      Where is it on the globe of America?

      Near Georgia))
    2. +3
      25 February 2012 06: 36
      Quote: mr.Man
      The Latvian (Latvian) media believes that in Russia, in general, all the seams and soon it will end,


      Latvia's foreign debt in 2011 was already 45% of GDP, Russia has 3%, I think the comments are unnecessary
  40. +1
    25 February 2012 10: 13
    Let's see how they turn on their "rattles" and "horror stories" following Putin's yesterday's meeting with experts on national security and the development of the military-industrial complex.
  41. 0
    25 February 2012 11: 10
    Just watched N 24 German news. The sunburned monkey of America speaks openly. "My message to President Assad is time to change the regime so that the bloodshed ends." Only did not say who sheds blood. About Nislov's armed gangs. Some people are shedding blood.