Mexican expedition of Cortez. The Siege and Fall of Tenochtitlan

45
Mexican expedition of Cortez. The Siege and Fall of Tenochtitlan

The capture of Tenochtitlan. Spanish image XVII.


Exhausted by the 93 day siege, the city was finally subdued. No more fierce cries of "Santiago!" Nor the hoarse war cries of Indian soldiers could be heard on its streets. By evening, the merciless massacre subsided - the winners themselves were exhausted by stubborn battles and fed up with blood today. Hernan Cortez, commander of the Spanish expeditionary detachment and military leader of numerous Indian allies, allowed the remnants of the population to leave Tenochtitlan, devastated by siege, famine and epidemics. About 30, thousands of residents - all that remained of the once densely populated city, exhausted and exhausted, wandered along the dams of Lake Texcoco. The ruins, smoking and generously littered with the dead, summed up not only the 22 started on May 1521 from the siege of the “capital of savages”, compared with which many cities of Spain looked like big villages, but also completed a series of military expeditions against the Aztec country. Expeditions, which were supposed to bring the two most necessary things in the local, already begun to become colonial, lands - gold and glory. In gaining fame, the Spaniards did not doubt. Their exploits in the jungles and swamps of the West Indies were to overshadow even the merits of the conquerors of Moorish Granada. It was assumed that the gold to Eran Cortes will be told by none other than the Aztec ruler of the Kuahtemoc, captured. But the will of the last leader of the Aztecs turned out to be stronger than the walls of Tenochtitlan. The winners did not yet know this, hoping to take rich booty.



Following Columbus

The discovery in 1492 of new lands overseas created the prospect for Spain to transform from a regional kingdom into world leaders. The centuries-long process of reconquista was completed by the fall of the last Moorish stronghold, the Granada Caliphate. Numerous proud and as poor as the bellicose Spanish nobility reluctantly sheathed the sword. On the Iberian Peninsula, there are no more places where one could snoop glory and get gold - all that remained was to look for faraway and rumored fabulously rich countries located far in the East. It was possible, of course, to go in for the Berber pirates of the North African coast, but the trophies mined in such raids were no match for the stories of the Indians, where the gold was almost underfoot.

The energy of the military aristocracy and the rest of the military people, who had become accustomed to military affairs for some time, had already begun to look for a way out, converting into an increase in internal tension. And here, very opportunely, the country was swept by the news of the eccentric, but very energetic Genoese, who obtained from the royal couple Ferdinand and Isabella the financing of a risky expedition, and about its successful completion. Of course, the possible riot of the bored hidalgos encouraged the monarchs to give good to the navigator - the state treasury was as far from full as the legendary Katay or India from Madrid. Columbus and his companions told about the numerous and fabulously rich tropical islands and the peace-loving savages who inhabited them. A start was made, and more and more new expeditions stretched across the ocean.

Following Columbus, new personalities headed for themselves, in whose eyes and hearts no fire of knowledge of the world was burning, but a pragmatic fire of profit. They were led by a thirst for gold. Numerous islands were really beautiful, nature amazed with pomp and riot of colors. However, this magnificence could not be turned into voiced doubloes. The savages had little of the precious yellow metal, and it did not increase even when they began to be exterminated and enslaved with an ever-increasing scale. Very soon, the Spaniards received information about the vast continent that was further to the west, where, according to unclear and contradictory rumors, there were large cities crowded with such a coveted yellow metal. During their third voyage to New World, the ships of Columbus finally reached the shores of present-day Panama and Costa Rica, where locals told arrivals about lands rich in gold, which were located much further south. Obviously, it was then that the Spaniards first learned about Peru.

For a long time, the Spanish expansion in the New World was limited to the Caribbean - it was necessary to create a base for further advance to the west. The start of gold mining on Espanyol spurred the Spaniards to more intensive colonization. At the beginning of 1517, the expedition of Francisco de Cordoba on three ships ended up in a storm off the coast of the Yucatan Peninsula. It was possible to find out that these lands are inhabited not by primitive from the point of view of Europeans by savages of the Caribbean, but by much more developed Maya people. Aboriginal people wore gold jewelry in abundance, but the aliens were met with hostility - the Spaniards, battered in armed clashes, where de Cordoba himself was badly wounded, were forced to return to Cuba. So it became known that there are still unexplored and, most importantly, rich territories near the newly established colonies.

The information received by the people of de Cordoba greatly disturbed the local settlers and aroused the keen interest of Cuba's governor Diego Velazquez de Cuellar. In 1518, the expedition of Juan de Grilhava was equipped for a more detailed study of open lands. De Grilhava reached the coast of Yucatan and moved along it to the west, soon reaching Mexico, which he called New Spain. Then the expedition came into contact with representatives of the ruler of the Aztec state, who already knew about the appearance of the newcomers. De Grilhava conducted friendly negotiations with the Indians benevolently and skillfully, assuring them of the most peaceful intentions, and, moreover, carried out a number of lucrative trade deals, bartering quite a lot of gold and precious stones. Warmly saying goodbye to the host, the Spaniards returned to Cuba after the 6 month-long march.

The guesses of Diego Velázquez were confirmed: in the west there were indeed lands rich in gold and other jewels. And these lands did not yet belong to the Spanish crown. Such a glaring omission was necessary to correct. And then the enterprising governor began to prepare a new expedition, and she was no longer research.

“He had little money, but a lot of debt”


Fernando Cortes de Monroy and Pizarro Altamirano. So the conquistador was represented by an unknown artist of the 18th century.


Castilian passions with a Caribbean tinge began to rage almost immediately around the future expedition. The estimated size of the wealth of an uncharted country in the enterprising heads of the colonists was conveniently transformed into a decent sum. Enjoying great prestige among his soldiers and sailors, de Grilhava was pushed aside by the governor from participating in the new project. Velazquez feared that all the gold and other pleasant factors accompanying it, like the location of the royal court and honors, would pass by him. For this purpose, the governor decided to appoint another person, unaware that there would be much more trouble with him.

Hernan Cortes, who was destined to expand the possession of the Spanish crown and unusually enrich the royal treasury, came from a poor, albeit a very noble noble family. He was born in 1485 year - by the time the majority of the young men of the Mauritanian states in Spain no longer exists. Therefore, the young Cortes went to study at the University of Salamanca, where he studied for two years. However, the study bored the young hidalgo, all the more everyone around was talking about new lands open across the ocean, where you can not only make a career, but also get rich quick. In 1504, Cortes throws a university and travels across the ocean to Espanyol. Later, in 1510 – 1514. he took part in the complete conquest of Cuba by the Spaniards under the command of Diego Velázquez.

At the time of the expedition outfit to Mexico, Cortez held the position of alcalde in the newly founded city of Santiago. Contemporaries noted his lively, dynamic mind and education - the failed graduate of Salamanca knew Latin well and in his letters did not once quote ancient authors. At the end of October, 1518 of Velasquez signed a contract and instructions for Cortes, according to which the governor of Cuba equipped three ships, and Cortes himself and the treasurer of the colony Amador de Lares provided funds for the remaining ten. Thus, Velazquez oversaw the expedition, but invested much less money there than its other organizers. In order to raise the necessary funds, Cortes had to pledge all his property and thoroughly get into debt. The recruitment of participants was going on suspiciously quickly - each of Cortes promised a share in the spoils and a vast estate with slaves.

A squad of fortune seekers numbering more than 500 people were recruited without much difficulty, however, such activity somewhat puzzled Senor Velasquez. In the colonial administration, where one of the most effective means of reaching the upper steps of the career ladder was the banal pacing and regular informing, Cortes had enough enemies and rivals. They even whispered in the corners that the proud hidalgo wanted to conquer Mexico for himself and become its ruler. Naturally, such rumors disturbed Señor Velasquez, and he issued an order to dismiss Cortés from the post of the expedition leader, but in response received only an ironic letter asking not to take the saboteurs seriously. The enraged governor ordered to arrest the insolent squadron and detain the squadron that was ready to sail, however 10 February 1519, 11 expedition ships left Cuba and headed for the west.

Aliens and owners

The enterprise of Cortes was in its essence not a full-fledged invasion, but was rather similar to the usual robber raid organized by a large and well-armed gang. At the disposal of the adventurer was a little more than 550 people (including 32 crossbowman and 13 arquebusiers), who had 14 tools and 16 horses. About a hundred sailors from the ship’s crews and about two hundred Indian porters should be added to them. On the side of the Spaniards was not only a solid combat experience of European and colonial wars, but also a significant technological advantage. In addition to firearms weapons and crossbows, they had steel weapons and armor. Horses completely unfamiliar to the Indians, for a long time they were perceived as a kind of "miracle weapon" of white aliens.



Rounding the Yucatan Peninsula, Cortes made a stop at Campeche Bay. The local population did not feel a touch of hospitality to the Spaniards and therefore rushed into battle. Cleverly using artillery and horsemen against the Indians, Cortes managed to disperse the numerous enemy. The local leaders, who made the necessary conclusions, sent gifts to the menacing newcomers, including 20 young women. One of them, after baptism, who received the sonorous name of Donna Marina, led the expedition leader closer to her, and she played an important role in the conquest against the Aztecs. Moving further west along the coast, on April 21, the Spaniards landed on the coast and founded the fortified settlement of Veracruz. It has become the main stronghold and transit point of the upcoming campaign.

Cortes and his companions in general already imagined the situation in the local regions. In most parts of Mexico, from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico, there is a vast Aztec state, which is in fact the union of three cities: Texcoco, Tlakopana and Tenochtitlana. Real power was concentrated in Tenochtitlan and was in the hands of the supreme ruler, or emperor, as the Spaniards called him. The Aztec imposed a large number of different cities with an annual tribute - they did not interfere in internal affairs, demanding from the local authorities only timely payments and provision of military contingents in the event of hostilities. The existing order of things was an impressive opposition in the face of the large and powerful city of Tlaxcala, whose population reached almost 300 thousand people. The rulers of Tlaxcala were the old enemies of Tenochtitlan and waged an ongoing war with him. The emperor of the Aztecs at the time of the appearance of Cortes was Montezuma II, the ninth ruler. He was known as an experienced and skilled warrior and talented administrator.

Soon after the Spaniards fortified themselves in Veracruz, a delegation led by the local Aztec governor arrived. He was received favorably by arranging a whole performance, which, in combination, was a demonstration of military power. The people of Cortez showed riders to the shocked Aboriginal people, and they set up their artillery fireworks as a final chord. The head of the conquistadors was amiable and gave gifts to Montezuma through the governor. The gilded Spanish helmet was especially notable among them.

Meanwhile, a detachment of Cortes began to make his way deep into the continent. The companions of this campaign were the heat, mosquitoes and the famine that began soon - the provisions brought from Cuba fell into disrepair. A week after the visit of the governor from the Aztecs, a new delegation arrived with great gifts, including gold and expensive jewelry. Montezuma, through his envoys, thanked Cortes, but categorically refused to conduct any negotiations with the aliens and persistently asked them to turn back. A large part of the Spanish detachment supported this idea, considering the obtained loot to be sufficient, and the hardships experienced in the march - too heavy. However, Cortez, who put everything at stake in this enterprise, resolutely insisted on continuing the campaign. In the end, the argument that there was still a lot of booty ahead played a role, and the march continued. Gradually, Cortez and his companions realized that they were to deal not with the wildish tribes of Cuba and Hispaniola, but with a numerous enemy, well-armed by Native American standards. The most sensible in this situation was to take advantage of the discord among the Indians and the fact that part of the population expressed dissatisfaction with the Aztecs, and get allies among the locals.

As they moved deeper into Mexico, the Spaniards clashed with the warriors of the city of Tlaxcala, Tenochtitlan’s strongest and most persistent rival. Initially, the Tlaxcalteks mistakenly took whites for the Aztec allies and attacked them. This attack was repulsed, but the Spaniards praised the fighting qualities of the warriors of this tribe. Finding out the situation, the leaders of Tlaxcala offered Cortes their assistance, providing porters and warriors for his detachment. Subsequently, the Spaniards were held by other tribes. None of these native princes, obviously, did not even suspect that after the destruction of the Aztecs, their turn would come, and the seemingly friendly whites would not even leave the memory of their Indian allies.

The behavior of Montezuma caused embarrassment to his entourage - the further Cortez’s squad advanced, the more the Aztec ruler lost his presence of mind and his inherent will. Maybe the legend of the god Quetzalcoatl played a role here, who once had to return, and which Cortez allegedly used for his own purposes. Or maybe, Montezuma was influenced by greatly exaggerated stories about the weapons of white aliens and their horses. Time after time, the Aztec ruler sent his envoys with rich gifts to the conquistadors, insistently demanding that they turn back and not go to Tenochtitlan. However, such events had the opposite effect. White's appetites only grew, as did their desire to continue the path.

Montezuma continued to surprise his subjects with indecision. On the one hand, it was not without his knowledge that an ambush was organized in the city of Cholula on the Spaniards, only at the last moment revealed by Cortes' companion to the bottom Marina. On the other hand, the Aztec ruler easily repudiated the rulers of Cholula, executed by aliens, explaining what happened with a slight misunderstanding. Having large military forces, many times superior to the detachment of the Spaniards and their allies, Montezuma nevertheless did not budge, but continued to send gifts, each time more and more luxurious than the previous ones, and asked the aliens to turn back. Cortez was relentless, and in early November 1519 his detachment saw the Aztec capital Tenochtitlan before him.

Cortes in Tenochtitlan, or Night of Sorrow

A detachment of Europeans and their allies freely entered the city, located on an island in the middle of Lake Texcoco, through one of the dams connecting Tenochtitlan with the shore. At the entrance they were met by Montezuma himself and his nearest dignitaries in expensive and elegant clothes. Observant soldiers, to their delight, noticed a large amount of gold jewelry on the “savages”. The city struck the Europeans with its size and livability. It had wide streets and vast squares - the Aztec capital contrasted brightly with many European cities. The area around Tenochtitlana was densely populated, other no less magnificent and large cities were located nearby. And in the midst of all these man-made riches was Cortes with several hundred warriors, exhausted by the road through the jungle.


Spanish image of Tenochtitlana XVII.


There could be no question of conquering this huge and rich country by such meager forces, and the leader of the conquistadors behaved intelligently, prudently and sophisticatedly. He began to "process" Montezuma, gradually subordinating the will of the Aztec ruler. The detachment was located in a vast building, almost in the center of Tenochtitlan, and Cortes managed to persuade Montezuma to go there to live as a sign of his location for the newcomers. Using the excitement of the Indians and their attack on the garrison of Veracruz, Cortes achieved the extradition of the guilty leaders and burning them at the stake. For greater interest, the most of Montezuma was shackled.

An enterprising hidalgo began to rule the country on his behalf and first of all demanded tribute from the rulers of Tenochtitlan under the authority of gold. The volume of prey taken was simply colossal. For ease of transportation, the Spaniards poured most of the jewelry and jewelry into gold bars. Illiterate soldiers from Castile and Andalusia did not know such figures to calculate the monetary equivalent of the captured treasures. However, they still had to be taken out of the city, the hospitality of which caused more and more concerns.

Meanwhile, disturbing came from the coast. news. The governor of Cuba, Senor Velasquez, continued to worry about the fate of the escaped Cortes and his people, so he sent in the footsteps of his fugitive, Panfilo de Narvaez, on 18 ships accompanied by a detachment of 1500 soldiers with an order to deliver Cortes "dead or alive". Leaving a small garrison in Tenochtitlan to protect Montezuma, as well as the sick and wounded, Cortes rushed to Veracruz, having about 260 Spaniards and 200 Indian soldiers armed with spikes. He was going to solve the problem with the newcomers with cunning and power. For a start, several officers were sent to Narvaez, on which they prudently hung a lot of gold jewelry. Narvaez was a good servant and rejected all attempts to reach an agreement, but his subordinates, seeing the tremendous possibilities and prospects in the outfit of parliamentarians, made the proper conclusions. Under cover of night, the people of Cortez attacked the detachment of Narvaez. They managed to quietly remove the sentries and capture the guns. Their opponents fought reluctantly and without due enthusiasm, willingly moving to the side of Cortes. Narvaez himself lost an eye in battle and was captured. His army actually replenished the ranks of the conquistadors - Cortes ordered to return them weapons and personal belongings, arranging them with gifts.

During fights between the Spaniards, a messenger arrived from Tenochtitlan with frightening news that an uprising had begun in the Aztec capital. Soon the whole country rose against the aliens. Cortez was ready for such a development. Now his army consisted of 1300 soldiers, 100 riders, 150 arquebusiers. The Tlaxcalteks, who remained his reliable allies, added to this number more than 2 thousands of selected warriors. Rapidly advancing, the allies of 24 June 1520 approached Tenochtitlan. And then the reasons for the uprising became known: during the traditional celebration for the Indians in honor of the god of war, the Witzlipochtli Spaniards, led by the garrison commander Pedro de Alvarado, wanted to appropriate the rich gold jewelry worn on the priests. As a result of the quarrel, many locals and priests were killed and robbed. This overwhelmed the Aztec patience, and they took up arms.

It is wrong to represent the Aztec state education as a paradise of the New World, and its population is the gullible and good-natured inhabitants of a fairy-tale country. The power of the Aztecs was cruel and merciless, their religious cult included regular and numerous human sacrifices. However, the white aliens, mistaken for the messengers of the gods at first, turned out to be no less cruel than the Aztecs, and their greed and thirst for gold knew no limits. In addition, they brought with them a hitherto unknown disease, which began to devastate the country. As it turned out, one of the black slaves from the ships of Narvaez was sick with smallpox, about which the Indians had no idea.

Having more forces than at the beginning of the march, Cortes easily entered Tenochtitlan and unblocked the Alvarado garrison. However, soon the Indians blocked the invaders in the buildings occupied by them, blocking the supply of food. The attacks continued almost daily, and the Spaniards began to bear significant losses, to which famine was added. While under siege, Cortes again decided to resort to the help of his noble captive: he convinced Montezuma to speak to his subjects and convince them to stop fighting. The Aztec ruler came out in full dress on the roof of the building and began to admonish residents and soldiers to stop the assault and allow the newcomers to leave the city. His speech was met with a shower of stones and arrows. Having been mortally wounded, Montezuma died after some time. Together with him ended attempts to negotiate with the Indians peacefully.

The forces of the besiegers increased, the position of the besieged in the imperial palace deteriorated. It ended not only food, but also stocks of gunpowder. In early July, Cortez makes the difficult decision to go for a breakthrough from the city. Of all the stolen treasures, he singled out the royal share, which was obligatory for transportation, and allowed the rest to take as much gold as they could. Experienced warriors grabbed precious stones, while recruits, former soldiers of Narvaez, burdened themselves with a large amount of yellow metal. Subsequently, it played a deadly joke with them.

In the dead of midnight, loading the load on the Indians and a few horses, the detachment of Cortes went on a breakthrough. However, the noise of the marching column was heard by the sentries, and soon it was attacked by numerous forces. The portable bridge, assembled for ease of forcing the canals, overturned, and many of the retreating were in the water. The weight of the newly acquired riches dragged down their newly-made masters down, and many simply drowned. In the confusion, the Aztecs managed to take some prisoners. With great difficulty, the Spaniards and their allies reached the shores of Lake Texcoco. On this night, which later received the poetic name “Night of Sorrow”, they suffered heavy losses.

In the following days, the conquistadors underwent new attacks and eventually retreated to the allied Tlaxcala. On the night of sorrow and in the following days, Cortes lost almost 900 Spaniards and about 1,5 thousands of Allied Indians. Captured in captivity were sacrificed, as were several horses. The allies Cortes managed to put in order his battered army and begin to implement revenge.

The siege and death of Tenochtitlan

The leader of the conquistadors, despite the difficult situation and loss, with all the energy began to prepare the seizure of the Aztec capital. By persuasion, promises, gifts, he was able to win over a number of Indian tribes to his side. His comrades-in-arms were able to intercept several ships with reinforcements and supplies sent by the governor of Cuba to the aid of the Narvaez detachment, whose fate he had no idea about. Realizing that it would be expensive and unproductive to attack Tenochtitlan only from land, Cortes ordered the shipmaster Martin Lopez in his army to build 13 small collapsible brigantines for action on Lake Texcoco.

Preparing for the battle and the Aztecs. After the death of Montezuma, the supreme power passed to his brother, Kuitlauaca, but he soon died of smallpox, and his nephew, a talented and courageous commander Kuautemok, took command. He made great efforts to strengthen the city and increase the fighting efficiency of the still numerous Aztec troops.

28 December 1521. Cortes troops marched on Tenochtitlan. He had about 600 Spaniards (of which 40 riders and about 80 arquebusiers and crossbowmen) and more than 15 thousands of soldiers of the allied Indian tribes. Reaching loyal to the Aztec city of Texcoco near the lake of the same name, Cortes decided to equip his headquarters here. Here it was planned to carry out the assembly of riverboats built by the Spaniards, for which it was necessary to dig a canal into Lake Texcoco. This labor-intensive operation took only a few months - the Spaniards had plenty of labor. Cortez sent a message to Quautemoku, offering him peace and power over his state in exchange for an oath to the Spanish king. Knowing what an overly trusting uncle had finished, the young ruler solemnly swore that any Spaniard who was captured would be sacrificed without fail. It was not possible to agree, and soon the fighting resumed.

28 April 1521. The Spaniards brought their first three vessels into the lake, each with a cannon. 22 May Spanish and Indian troops blocked all three dams connecting Tenochtitlan with the coast. Thus began the three-month siege of the city. Great assistance to the allies was provided by prudently built brigantines, regularly shelling the positions of the Aztecs. The launched assault attacks, in spite of the initial success achieved, did not lead to the desired results - attempts to gain a foothold in urban areas failed repeatedly. Kauutemoku managed to strengthen its capital well.

Yet the strategic position of the Aztec deteriorated. Seeing their unenviable state, the former allies began to go over to the side of the enemy. Tenochtitlan was completely blocked, and the supply of food stopped. To top it off, on the orders of Cortes, the aqueduct was destroyed, supplying the island with drinking water, which the besieged had to extract from wells. One of the attacks of the Spaniards ended with the encirclement and the defeat of the assault column - 60 prisoners were solemnly sacrificed at the top of the Great Temple, towering in the city center. This tactical defeat of the enemy encouraged defenders and raised doubts among the conquistadors' allies.

Then Cortez decided to change tactics - instead of head-on attacks and attempts to break into the center of the city, he began to systematically gnaw through the defense. Captured buildings were destroyed, and city canals were filled up. Thus, it turned out more free space, convenient for the actions of artillery and cavalry. Another attempt to negotiate was scornfully rejected by the Quauhtemoc, and on August 13 the Allies launched a general assault. By this time, the forces of the defenders had been undermined by hunger and progressive diseases, and yet they put up serious resistance.

On the last hours of Tenochtitlan there are conflicting information. Thus, according to one of the legends, the last center of resistance was at the top of the Great Temple, where, after a merciless fight, the Spaniards managed to hoist the royal banner. Four big pies were seen from one of the brigantines trying to cross the lake - the ship chased them and captured them. On one of the pie was Quauhtemoc, who offered himself hostage in exchange for the integrity of his loved ones and satellites. He was sent to Cortes, who met the captive ruler with emphasized politeness. In the city itself continued the massacre, which began to subside only in the evening. Then the winners "graciously" allowed the surviving inhabitants to leave their city, turned into ruins. The Quauhtemok was subsequently interrogated and tortured in the hope of obtaining information about gold - the Spaniards took much more modest loot than they had expected. Without saying anything, the last ruler of the Aztecs was executed, along with him the secret of the gold hidden by his order died. This did not save the Aztecs from colonization. As, however, Indian gold subsequently not only did not save the Spanish colonial empire from collapse, but also became one of the reasons for the decline of Spain.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    31 May 2017 07: 14
    And yet a few words in defense of the Spaniards.
    1. As for smallpox, this was historically inevitable. Since America was discovered, European microbes would still have got there anyway. But no one knew yet that diseases were caused by bacteria and viruses in the 16th century. So smallpox is an all-unintentional thing. In response, the Indians awarded the conquerors syphilis, so one-by-one.
    2. The conquest was cruel. But were the wars of that time generally less cruel? This war is no different from the thousands of others that rattled from Tenochtitlan to Beijing.
    3. The Aztecs themselves were those still innocent lambs. The author said this, but somehow crumpled, tongue twister. Meanwhile, any Chikatilo would envy the sophistication of the local priests. Cutting out the heart is the easiest and quickest way to kill victims. There were much longer rituals. The tributaries had nothing to love the Aztecs. These Indians had an interesting custom. There were many, many victims. As a rule, they were mined by raids on neighbors. But if suddenly the raid ended in failure, then tributaries were forced to declare war on the Aztecs. But instead of military weapons, their soldiers had to go into battle with bouquets of flowers. "Flower Wars" - that's what it was called. Naturally, armies with bouquets almost in full force were captured and sent to sacrificial altars. So it is not surprising that the state of these maniacs was swept away as soon as the Spaniards appeared, who were able to unite all Aztec enemies under one banner.
    4. The military business of the Mexican Indians was very peculiar. In war, as in war - sometimes enemies were killed. But the main measure of martial art and valor was not the number of those killed, but the number of captured adversaries. So the Spaniards had little chance to die in battle. Perhaps the only case of mass death of whites is the Night of Sorrow. With complete superiority in tactics and very serious - in arms, the Spaniards could just slaughter the Indians like pigs, while they with their bare hands tried to pull the enemies out of order to capture them. Although if the tactics of the Indians were aimed at the extermination of enemies, the case for Cortes could turn out very badly. After all, the level of equipment of the conquistadors was ridiculously low by European standards, they were few dressed in Milanese armor to the very ears, most of them were protected only with chain mail or quilted jackets. For comparison: when the Spaniards encountered the Araucans, who, without bothering, simply killed the enemies, they were not helped by either a gun, nor cavalry, or arquebuses. Although the Araucans fought with weapons of the Stone Age, the Spaniards could not conquer these tribes in 150 years of war.
    5. After the conquest, however, the Spaniards acted with the locals quite humanly. In case of baptism, they were given full rights, local privileges remained for the local nobility, only the titles changed. For a short period of time, the Spaniards tried to convert the local Indians into slavery, but quickly abandoned it. And some time later, the Indians received the rights of subjects from the Spanish crown, and as such began to be protected by the royal authority from oppression (for taxpayers, besides Christians). Most of the modern population of South and Central America are direct descendants of Native American Indigenous peoples. In general, the rule of the Spaniards was much milder and much less bloody than the actions of the Anglo-Saxons in North America, where they staged a form of genocide.
    1. +4
      31 May 2017 08: 12
      Quote: Molot1979
      In general, the rule of the Spaniards was much milder and much less bloody than the actions of the Anglo-Saxons in North America, where they staged a form of genocide.

      Yes, softer: Mexico’s population has declined “only” 25 times(from 25 million to 1 million people). The rest of Latin America was no better. Such are the "humanists."

      By the way, the 500th anniversary of the discovery of America in South America was celebrated only in Argentina: in other countries there were protests, dousing of monuments with Columbus paint and demands for the recognition of this day as mourning.
      Quote: Molot1979
      And yet a few words in defense of the Spaniards.
      .

      I did not see anything justifying them: the Spanish barbarians destroyed two civilizations, which in many respects were higher than their head.
      1. +9
        31 May 2017 08: 56
        Is the Aztecs higher? Which wheels did not know)) But on the other hand, any sadistic maniac was given a head start. And yes! They were Satanists. People were sacrificed by hundreds and very often. Cannibalism was widespread and was considered normal.
        1. +5
          31 May 2017 09: 49
          What to speak with him. The Soviet textbook, which fell on his head, knocked out the last vestiges of common sense from it. Exceeded by head. Yeah, knowing from metals only gold, silver and copper. Oh, so surpassed, oh, how surpassed. And the Spaniards destroyed them out of envy. There is nothing to surpass us by a head.
          1. +6
            31 May 2017 17: 37
            Quote: Molot1979
            What to speak with him. Soviet textbook fell on his head, knocked out of her the last vestiges of common sense.

            Very convincing argument! We are good-natured, intelligent, polite people, saturated with respect and reverence for everything and everything ..... in the spirit of romance and noble exploits outlined in the article. Don Quixote Lamanites laughing
          2. 0
            1 June 2017 11: 13
            Quote: Molot1979
            What to speak with him. The Soviet textbook, which fell on his head, knocked out the last vestiges of common sense from it.


            For you, a brick is safe: there is nothing to knock Yes
            1. 0
              4 March 2018 16: 19
              You, comrade, have not given a single REASONABLE argument for the Aztecs. Except one thing - the Spaniards attacked them, and not vice versa. But for the 16th century, this logic does not work. Who is stronger is right. And the Aztecs themselves for centuries lived by this rule. Until the Spaniards came and broke the cannibals in the first and tenth. Who gurgled about the reduction of the population by 25 times? Head thinking is not, not our method? Even the Germans, recognized docks for genocides, with all their technology, could not exterminate a comparable amount of the lavender. Well, it's impossible technically. And in the 16th century, no gas chambers, no machine guns .... The vast majority of Indians died from epidemics, which were the historically absolutely inevitable result of transatlantic travels. Even if Don Fennando had made every possible effort to save the Indians, nothing would have come of it. Antibiotics have not yet been invented. The only way to save Aboriginal people would be to sit at home. But this is unrealistic.
              So, Olgovich, deal with your head no matter what it falls on, and don’t rubbish about superiority on your head.
        2. 0
          31 May 2017 19: 34
          Quote: Velizariy
          Cannibalism was widespread and was considered normal.

          Well, the custom of eating the body of God or part of it (well, or part of the declared sacred) in every religion. Ours is no exception.
          They had more animal ...
          But by the way, we are all descendants of cannibals and corpse eaters ... otherwise we would not have survived.
          1. +1
            1 June 2017 08: 28
            You are definitely a descendant of a corpse-eater ... With such thinking
            1. 0
              1 June 2017 19: 23
              Quote: Velizariy
              You are definitely a descendant of a corpse-eater ... With such thinking

              if my ancestor survived, then it is possible. Mankind has had to go through a lot-cannibalism, eating rotten (echoes of love for such cheeses, meat from the northern peoples, etc.)
              It’s not even a matter of the fact that the ancestors got down from the trees or got into the savannah. Well, we do not possess the abilities of predators-natural machines. But it was necessary to survive, but there was not enough vegetable food. All the more so in the north. And ice ages are not a joke.
              It is possible that you too.
              1. +1
                2 June 2017 08: 21
                Quote: Catherine II
                It is possible that you too.

                Ruled out. I sympathize with you.
          2. 0
            4 March 2018 16: 25
            However, Christians still did not eat people who had been slaughtered before on the altar. Unlike. And anyway, why are we all the time about the Spaniards? There were a handful of them. And 2000 will not be typed. But the Tlaskalans gave Cortess about 150 thousand fighters. Almost a hundred times more. It was they, and not a miserable handful of whites, who conquered Mexico. Yes, then the Spaniards drank a lot of blood. But they still only had to do it, and the Aztecs had been eating away the local liver for 300 years. Naturally, the Spaniards are a lot of volunteers.
      2. +5
        31 May 2017 09: 46
        If the respected person read the text more carefully, he would have noticed that the words "smallpox" were spoken there. It was she, and not the blades of the Spaniards, that so thinned the Indian peoples. But, apparently, out of indignation you either closed your eyes in the right place, or the logic said dosvidos.

        And yet, what is only in Argentina? You are an ignoramus, my dear, therefore, you simply do not know that for many centuries the American colonies fought with the mother country until, finally, Comrade S. Bolivar finally freed them. Therefore, naturally, the attitude towards Madrid there for a long time was equal to the attitude of Riga to Moscow.

        What exactly were they raised to the head? In the extermination of their own kind? Indeed, the Spaniards thought of just burning alive. While the slave-owning Indians of the early Bronze Age level that surpassed them by head thought of throwing people into the fire, then immediately pulling them back with hooks, throwing them over their shoulders, dancing a ritual dance, and then burning it. Romans such as Haggard and Soviet textbooks created a halo of poor innocent victims for these fanatics, in which any fighters against feudalism were clearly “good”. By the way, there was one more sulfur, where the Aztecs surpassed the Spaniards not even by their heads, but by the whole Eiffel Tower. Maybe you didn’t know, but the “blaarod savages” not only sacrificed people, but then also ate them. That is, they were banal cannibals. What they themselves wrote in their codes without any hesitation. He ate a little man including Kuautemok, the organizer of the defense of Tenochtitlan. And not from hunger, but because he, as the ruler, was supposed to participate in this religious act. By the way, Cortes did not hang him at all for treasures, but on suspicion of a conspiracy. Which changes the matter somewhat.
        1. +4
          31 May 2017 13: 39
          According to your logic, if a person is less educated and cultured, then he can be easily beaten in the face? If the Indians were, in your opinion, barbarians, then they should be civilized without asking? Protecting the Spaniards, you at least answer the question, why did they even climbed there? For the sake of good and bright? And in my opinion, for the sake of robbery. and capture colonies. In addition, you say that you didn’t exterminate the Indians, so why kill a cow that gives milk? So the Indians were used in mines, where noble Spaniards did not go. And the Indians died there, like flies. Moreover, when did the pope acknowledge that the Indians are also people and they have a soul?
          1. +4
            31 May 2017 14: 48
            And why did the peoples fight each other, your moralizing is ridiculous. Name the humane people of the 16th century
          2. 0
            4 March 2018 16: 27
            This, my friend, is not my logic, but the logic of history. He who is more cultured has better weapons, which means that he bends all around. And so it was everywhere and always. Protesting against this is no more productive than swearing in the snow in winter.
        2. +4
          31 May 2017 17: 32
          About cannibalism, reasoning and evaluation, a little mischievously comes out.
          The view from our side and from the position of our maral, that is, in our opinion it is immoral, however, from the point of view of the Aztecs, this is correct and correct from the point of view of their maral.
          That was right in their value system! Yes, by the way, can they recall the aspirationally civilized Japanese of their samurai traditions (what about eating enemies)?
          Actually poison gas and throw nuclear bombs into adversaries civilized inventions.
          Well, how is the comparison of cannibals and mass murderers on the issue of morality?
          The pride of their superiority in the destruction of their own kind is not bursting?
          Maybe we should be ashamed of civilization for our achievements!
          Although we know how to make excuses better than savages
        3. +2
          1 June 2017 11: 42
          Quote: Molot1979
          If the respected person read the text more carefully, he would have noticed that the words "smallpox" were spoken there. It was she, and not the blades of the Spaniards, that so thinned the Indian peoples. . But, apparently, out of indignation you either closed your eyes in the right place, or the logic said dosvidos.

          I have not a word about blades. But, apparently, the eyes froze from indignation. Infection with smallpox (and not only it) was not only involuntary, but also intentional: for example, blankets infected with smallpox, etc. .
          Quote: Molot1979
          And yet, what is only in Argentina? You are an ignoramus, my dear, therefore, you simply do not know that for many centuries the American colonies fought with the mother country until, finally, Comrade S. Bolivar finally freed them. Therefore, naturally, the attitude towards Madrid there for a long time was equal to the attitude of Riga to Moscow.


          You are illiterate just surprisingly: read themselves : AS the 500th anniversary of the discovery of America in South America was "celebrated," there is no educational program and no school for the poor.
          Quote: Molot1979
          What exactly were they raised to the head?


          I wrote, in many ways. For example, they did NOT destroy several civilizations in the Old World and did not destroy tens of millions of people there in one way or another.
          Quote: Molot1979
          Indeed, the Spaniards thought of just burning alive

          fool Such delirium I have not heard for a long time: read about the methods of the Holy Inquisition, you will be pleasantly surprised.
          Quote: Molot1979
          while the slave-owning Indians of the early Bronze Age level that surpassed them by head thought of throwing people into the fire, then immediately pulling them back with hooks, throwing them over their shoulders, dancing a ritual dance, and then burning it.


          At that stage of the early development of civilization, for them it was NORMAL: these were traditions and beliefs, they had no other examples. Children, in a word. To evaluate them from today's positions of humanism -the top of idiocy ..
          fool
          But medieval Europeans became outright ignorant unwashed beast after millennia of the development of civilization, with antiquity, etc. And here they can be judged and called in their own words.

          Do I clearly state or repeat? Yes
      3. +1
        31 May 2017 11: 01
        Most of the South and Central American Indians died of disease, look, and better read Shotguns, germs and steel: the history of human communities (English Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies) - American scientist Jared Diamond,
        The development of animal husbandry has led to another important effect: the transmission of pathogens from livestock to humans. So, for example, people got smallpox, measles and flu from animals. Over time, through a series of regular epidemics using mechanisms of natural selection, the surviving Eurasians have developed significant resistance to the causative agents of these diseases. Residents of other parts of the world did not have such resistance, and they were dying en masse from diseases introduced by Eurasians.
        The Spaniards did not consciously bring the disease to the New World, but the Anglo-Saxons poisoned the natives quite consciously. In Tasmania, they generally declared the locals non-people and stupidly ate.
        1. 0
          1 June 2017 11: 53
          Quote: sterx20072
          most of the South and Central American Indians died of disease,


          What are you ?! belay Can not be! Did someone say something else?
          Quote: sterx20072
          The Spaniards didn’t knowingly bring the disease to the New World,

          Yes, yes, but if they had been aware, they certainly would not have come, yes. lol fool
      4. +2
        31 May 2017 16: 59
        Where does 25 million come from? Where in Europe then there were such numbers?
        And so the Mexicans are the descendants of the Aztecs, Spaniards and their mixing.
        1. +2
          31 May 2017 22: 13
          Where from the ceiling, of course, how could it be considered there.
          1. 0
            1 June 2017 12: 04
            Quote: Cartalon
            Where from the ceiling, of course, how could it be considered there.


            Can you refute, except TPG "from the ceiling"?
        2. 0
          1 June 2017 12: 09
          Quote: EvilLion
          Where does 25 million come from?

          In Central Mexico, by 1519 there were approximately 25 млн. man, and by the end of the 60s of the XVI century. almost 10 times less - 2,6 млн
          http://uchebniki-besplatno.com/stran-evropyi-isto
          riya / naselenie-43411.html
      5. +3
        31 May 2017 22: 52
        Quote: Olgovich
        Mexico's population declined “only” 25 times (

        mainly as a result of epidemics - against measles Indians did not have immunity
        Quote: Olgovich
        Spanish barbarians destroyed two civilizations, which were in many ways taller than they were.

        Yeah, the achievements of the Aztec civilization, as the “flower war" are especially impressive - 25 thousand people annually sacrificed to Tescatlipoca and Witsilipochtli!
        1. 0
          1 June 2017 12: 12
          Quote: Weyland
          mainly as a result of epidemics - against measles Indians did not have immunity

          And?
          Quote: Weyland
          Yeah, the achievements of the Aztec civilization are especially impressive as the “flower war" - 25 thousand people a year sacrificed to Tescatlipoca and Huitzilopochtli!

          So what? This was an early stage in the development of their civilization.
          And the Spaniards were beasts after millennia civilizations.
          Did you catch the difference?
          1. +1
            2 June 2017 22: 51
            Quote: Olgovich
            This was an early stage in the development of their civilization.

            In terms of development (as in antiquity, even if we consider the Spaniards from the Roman era. And the Aztecs from the Olmecs) the difference is not so great. Horse, iron, firearm - these are the main advantages of the Spaniards.
            1. 0
              3 June 2017 13: 57
              Quote: Weyland
              as in antiquity, even if we consider the Spaniards from the Roman era. and the Aztecs - from the Olmecs

              With what fright the Spaniards count from the "Roman era" ?! Europe is not isolated, like South America, the continent.
          2. +3
            10 January 2018 04: 52
            Quote: Olgovich
            So what? This was an early stage in the development of their civilization.

            and where in Europe were such "early stages"?
            Quote: Olgovich
            And the Spaniards were animals after millennia of civilization.

            Normal Spaniards were, therefore, Most of the current Mexicans are descendants of the aborigines. Compare with the Anglo-Saxon colonies.
  2. +2
    31 May 2017 07: 41
    in Tenochtitlan and was in the hands of the supreme ruler, or emperor, as the Spaniards called him
    ..Of course, the ruler of the three cities was captured in the report, somehow the glory was not the same, but if it was to report that they captured the emperor of the native empire .. Here and other glories and honors .. Thank you, Denis for a detailed and interesting story ..
    1. +2
      31 May 2017 09: 55
      Well, in general, the title of platooni is correct all the same as an imperial translation. The emperor of the Holy Roman Empire was also a so-so emperor, but he was. The kagans of nomadic empires were also not absolute monarchs, but the kagan is precisely the emperor, because he is above all other tribal khans.
  3. +3
    31 May 2017 13: 09
    the Aztecs compared with the Spaniards were monsters in general .. and it was not for nothing that the mass of neighboring tribes joined the Spaniards, even taking into account the local mentality of what types of sacrifices it brought that something was. By the way, the Spaniards, unlike the Anglo-Saxons, practically did not directly exterminate the indigenous ones .. , expressing loyalty to the administration almost made the kingdoms of Spain almost rightful, but the work and tribute that they paid in the metropolis weren’t better for the common people .. here as for the priesthood and aristocracy of local t yes many were executed .. well, and the Angles generally plagued everyone under the root.
    1. +4
      31 May 2017 22: 55
      Quote: tiaman.76
      .to adopt Catholicism, to show loyalty to the administration almost made the kingdom of Spain almost full,

      Without any “almost”: the leader who adopted Christianity automatically received noble dignity (and the great leader also the title), and the noble Spanish don did not hesitate to give his daughter away for such an Indian don! Compare with arrogance. As a result, in most LA countries, the majority of the population is either Indians or, mestizo
      1. 0
        1 June 2017 00: 11
        I agree..
  4. +6
    31 May 2017 15: 59
    I thought and still think Cortes is a wonderful person of his time. Although his goals were far from altruism, but I consider the destruction of the Aztec civilization as an extremely positive event.
    1. +3
      31 May 2017 22: 57
      Quote: Humpty
      I thought and still think Cortes is a wonderful man of his time.


      ChSH, among his other merits: he got from the king that Mexico was introduced feudal law (both in Spain) - not slavery!
  5. +2
    31 May 2017 19: 53
    I read it with pleasure.
    I agree with many about who such Aztecs are and why they were not loved.
    A nation of priests and cruelty, even by historical measures (America lagged behind Europe and Asia by approximately 500-1000 and more years due to the length of human colonization)
    It is not surprising that it was easy to win over all subordinate peoples to its side.
    The Spaniards are still the standard of cruelty.
    So the European standard of cruelty colonized the American standard of cruelty. In the matter of progress at the cost of millions of victims (not only by hand, but also by disease).
    Although the 3 empires of the Americans rested on cruelty and sacrifice, they were able to leave a lot of unique.
    You can add a description of the last assault
    The last line of defense at the Great Temple, 1521 year
    During the protracted assault on Tenochtitlan in the summer of 1521, the Spaniards once managed to break into the city center, but only so that at night the Indians could drive them out of there. Street fights are always bloody. A city for strangers is a maze. As a result, attempts to conduct an offensive for the Spaniards often ended up in the fact that they were surrounded, and the Indians attacked them from all sides and even from above. The Great Temple was about 30 meters high and was a step pyramid. It shows how the Spanish artillery crew fires on the Aztec squad.
    The gun is served by sailors, they are commanded by a horse officer. Many skulls of people sacrificed to the gods by the Aztecs rolled out of the damaged tsompantli - the vault of heads. Massacre was everywhere. Hundreds of men, women, children were killed, and corpses were thrown into canals. There was a rumor among the soldiers that children and women were hiding gold in their clothes, so the treatment of the helpless was especially cruel. By the end of the day, about ten 40.000 corpses lay on the streets of Tenochtitlan. The massacre ended only on 13 on August 1521, when the captain of one of the brigantines, Garcia Ologin, captured Kuautemok, who was trying to cross the lake by canoe. The captured Aztec emperor was brought to Cortes. “I fulfilled my duty, protecting the city to the last. Now I am your captive. I ask you about one thing: kill me. Thus, everything will be done away with, and with the great Mexican kingdom, too, ”said the emperor, and Marina and Aguilar translated his speech.
    Marina became an allied recruiter. This is a huge role in the victory of the Spaniards.
    Results of the expedition financially
    The main goal of the Cortes expedition was gold, but a lot of wealth could not be found. In the canoe of Cuautemoca there was a small part of the imperial treasury, but these were crumbs in comparison with the fact that the Spaniards had to throw in the “Night of Sorrow”. The emperor and other noble Aztecs underwent constant interrogations, but they could not achieve anything specific from them. Finally, Cortes burst with patience, and he ordered the execution of Quautemock. More gold was obtained from the allies. The total income of the expedition did not exceed 200.000 pesos. The crown received 37000, Cortes went to the pocket of Cortes 29600. Bills were paid, and I had to spend money on bribing officials. Francisco de Montejo received 6000 pesos, although his participation in the expedition was minimal. Payments to lawyers, secretaries and other associates ranged from 2000 to 3000 pesos. Unit commanders like Alvarado, Sandoval and Olida received only 400 pesos, although they all managed to hide some trophies. Ordinary soldiers received only 60 pesos - the cost of a new sword.
    Cortes' tactics combined will and ruthlessness. Pedro de Alvarado, who killed the Aztec nobility during the festival in Tokskatle, became particularly ruthless. In 1522, Alvarado arrived on the Pacific coast of Oaxaca at the head of a detachment of 240 people. He conquered the capital of the mixteks Tututepek. Then he headed south to Teguantepec, where he captured a large amount of gold from the local ruler of the sweatshops. Two years later, Alvarado defeated the Maya Quiche Indians in Guatemala, and captured the local leader Tecuma and burned him alive.

    In 1526, another officer of Cortez, Francisco de Montejo, received permission to make an expedition to the Yucatán Peninsula. The Spaniards acted with such cruelty that the embittered Indians for 20 years continued to wage war with the Spaniards here. Later, de Montejo managed to blame some of his problems on Gonzalo Guerrero, who survived the shipwreck and lived for many years in captivity at the Maya.

    In 1529, Nuno de Guzmán, a supporter of Velazquez and an enemy of Cortes, found himself in a dangerous situation. He decided to achieve the mercy of the king by subjugating the west of Mexico to the crown. He gathered an army of several thousand Spaniards and Allied Indians and walked with fire and sword from Michoacan to Sonora. Leader Purepecha was first tied to a horse and dragged along the ground to a half-dead state, and then burned alive. The Spaniards burned many Indian settlements, thousands of Indians were enslaved.
    1. 0
      31 May 2017 23: 27
      Quote: Catherine II
      By the end of the day, about 40.000 corpses lay on the streets of Tenochtitlan.

      Now the understanding of supporters and fans of Cortez has become more. laughing

      Urgently need to put a monument to Chikatilo lol The crisis is just beginning and bloody descriptions invigorate, where is midnight with zombies? smile
      1. +1
        1 June 2017 19: 53
        Quote: Novel 11
        Now the understanding of supporters and fans of Cortez has become more.

        there are fewer fans
        we are all the same representatives of Europe (albeit also cruel and genocidal)
        The Aztecs believed that human sacrifices were necessary for the sun to continue to move through the sky. This means that thousands of people were sacrificed annually. The Aztecs had huge pyramidal structures, with steps leading to the top, on which there was a sacrificial table. There, people were killed, and their hearts were pulled out of their chest, and raised to the Sun. The bodies of people were then thrown down the stairs, to an enthusiastic crowd. Many bodies were fed to animals, others were hung on trees, cases of cannibalism were also known. In addition to sacrifices on the pyramids, the Aztecs also burned people, shot them with bows, or forced them to kill each other, as the gladiators did.
        The Toshkatl holiday (from the word toxcahuia - drought) in honor of the god Teskatlipoki was held in the fifth month of the Aztec calendar in honor of the harvest and was intended to provide a good harvest in the future. A year before the holiday, a young handsome young man was chosen, usually from among captured warriors, who was to be worshiped almost like God all the next year. The chosen one lived in the palace, studied singing, playing the flute, and oratory. And on the day of the holiday, at the top of the pyramid, a ritual ceremony was performed - on a long sacrificial stone, the priests opened the unfortunate chest, pulled out a beating heart, and drove the body down to the crowd, where it was beheaded. And the celebration began, accompanied by eating the meat of the victim and dancing. The sacrifice was laid on a stone, the priest opened his chest and pulled out a beating heart from it. Then the heart was torn to pieces and laid on the altar, later the priests ate it. The body itself was thrown down from the pyramid, there it was beheaded, dismembered, and meat was prepared for the upcoming feast. The meat of the victims was used to prepare various dishes for priests and nobles. Most often cooked meat baked with corn. The bones went to make tools, weapons, household items. The recipe for one of these dishes - collier soup, which was prepared for the emperor from the victim's thigh - has survived to this day, only now they use pork for its preparation. Christians forced the replacement of human meat with Aztec pork.
        During the rule of the Aztecs in Mexico, about 250 thousand people were sacrificed every year. But the most massive of the known sacrifices was performed at the celebration of the completion of the Great Pyramid in Tenochtitlan. For many years this sacred temple was built, and in 1487 year it was erected. An incredibly large number of people were killed during the 4 day of the celebration - 84 thousands. Tlakashipeualiztli is one of the most terrible Aztec festivities held in honor of the god Shipe-Totek, “Mr. without skin.” For 40 days before the start of the holiday, several captured soldiers and slaves were selected, dressed in expensive clothes, and after that they lived in luxury, but only 40 days. And on the first day of the holiday, lasting 20 days, there was a mass sacrifice during which they skinned alive. The first day was completely busy removing the skin, and the second - the dismemberment of the bodies. The bodies were subsequently eaten, and the priests wore the skin for 20 days, after which they deposited it with them, and the priests used it during their ritual dances. During the Feast of Feeling, some victims were given a chance to escape. To do this, they needed to defeat the famous Aztec warriors, armed to the teeth, with only a wooden sword in their hands, which, of course, did not give them the slightest chance of victory. The fighting took place on a round sacrificial stone Temalakatl. But according to legend, one of the captives nevertheless succeeded, having killed 8 soldiers, to win this battle. The Aztecs were so impressed by the outcome that the winner was offered command of the army as a reward. But he did not accept their offer, considering it offensive to himself, and preferred to die with dignity, being sacrificed to the gods.
        The Aztecs, for the sake of their religion, did not spare even children. In one of the temples in honor of the god Tlaloku, who controls the forces of rain, thunder and lightning, during the drought the most terrible ritual was performed. In order to pray for rain from God, children were brought to the temple as victims and killed there. Many of the children did not want to go and cried loudly, climbing the stairs to the top of the temple. Those who did not cry themselves were forced to do this, since their crying was a necessary part of the ritual. At the top of the pyramid, the children were cut off their heads, and their bodies were taken out of town and stored in a special pit in the open. This was done so that fertile rain could also spill on them.
        In general, they loved the krovushka and the sight ...
        1. +1
          2 June 2017 18: 32
          Quote: Catherine II
          In general, they loved the krovushka and the sight.

          That is, if they savages could they be exterminated to zero? The Spaniards, too, are not holy sanctuaries of education, they had the Inquisition ..... but to eradicate because savages? Then what are they better?
    2. +3
      10 January 2018 04: 57
      Quote: Catherine II
      The Spaniards are still the standard of cruelty.

      Why do you think so? Because this is Anglo-Saxon propaganda? So we Russians are still savages for Europeans and also thanks to this propaganda.
      The standard of cruelty is the Anglo-Saxons without question. Just compare how many descendants of Aboriginal people in Mexico and how many in the USA.
  6. +3
    31 May 2017 22: 50
    Yeah ... noble peace-loving Aztecs - and bloodthirsty Spaniards, how familiar everything is!
    Google the “flower war”: the Aztecs constantly attacked their neighbors solely for the purpose of capturing prisoners and sacrificing them (just for 25 thousands frags per year) - that's why all the neighbors (except for the otomi, who were connected with the Aztecs by dynastic marriages) when Cortez appeared together rushed under his "roof" - reasonably believing that although the Spaniards are "not very fluffy" (although, of course, and white lol ) - but better is the “right team” of Cortez than the Montezuma rioters!
  7. +1
    5 June 2017 20: 53
    Great article, Denis! good But still, I’ll point out one of your omissions, a very important moment in Cortes’s campaign, namely, “The Miracle of Otumba” on July 7, 1520. After the “Nights of Sorrow” (La Noche Triste), the exhausted detachment of the Spaniards (about 450 people), striving for the Allied Tlaskale was met by the Aztec army of 20 thousand people (30 thousand in some sources) on the Otumba plain. The Spaniards could only win or die. And they won. Bernal Diaz, a participant in the Cortes expedition, author of the chronicle "The True History of the Conquest of New Spain" ( 1557-1575) indicates that St. James himself led the Spaniards along, because th victory they felt a real chudom.V general, the Spanish conquistadors won the most brilliant victory. She had huge political consequences. After it, they again began to see in the conquistadors the force that would crush the Aztec empire. Native American allies returned to Cortes and joined new ones. Without the “Miracle at Otumba” there would have been no fall of Tenochtitlan! hi
  8. ert
    0
    9 October 2017 07: 38
    Quote: Molot1979
    4. The military business of the Mexican Indians was very peculiar. In war, as in war - sometimes enemies were killed. But the main measure of martial art and valor was not the number of those killed, but the number of captured adversaries. So the Spaniards had little chance to die in battle. Perhaps the only case of mass death of whites is the Night of Sorrow. With complete superiority in tactics and very serious - in arms, the Spaniards could just slaughter the Indians like pigs, while they with their bare hands tried to pull the enemies out of order to capture them.
    I suppose that the Aztecs attacked the Spaniards with their bare hands when their weapons fell into disrepair. The assumption that it broke as a result of contact with Spanish armor looks quite justified. It is quite difficult to inflict mortal wounds with such weapons as the Atzecs, most likely the opponents were injured and lost their combat effectiveness, but they were not killed directly on the battlefield. Capturing a prisoner really was an honor.
  9. ert
    0
    9 October 2017 08: 00
    Quote: Weyland
    Google the “flower wars”: the Aztecs constantly attacked their neighbors solely for the purpose of capturing prisoners and sacrificing them (only 25 thousand frags a year)
    It is necessary to be careful about specific figures in the sources. Especially in military history. The enemy’s losses were often greatly exaggerated, while their losses were greatly minimized. This is true for both ancient Romans and modern Americans. In the case of the Aztecs, an enlightened Spaniard was beneficial to expose them as such bloodthirsty savages, and it is not difficult to draw a scribble on paper ... In general, the author of the article correctly pointed out that the Aztecs practiced mass sacrifices. Everything, to establish a specific scale is not possible. The Aztecs raided savage tribes with the aim of capturing prisoners, but how is this essentially different from the raids of European merchants for black goods? Maybe someone will say that the raids of these merchants were not senseless cruelty, that is, it is impossible to approve from the point of view of modern morality, but it’s completely understood, but the Aztecs’ raids had a rational link. Intimidation of the conquered population, strengthening of their power.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"